This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
I noticed you corrected my link at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. That's fine. However, this[ rule] does not allow it. I don not mind myself, but other users may get angry. So be careful! 68.100.116.118 ( talk) 02:03, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 22:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mysticism. Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I suggest that you read Wikipedia:No personal attacks#Avoiding personal attacks, wherein it's noted that arguments "should be directed at content and actions" (emphasis added). Kevin and I described Joe's actions, which are fundamental to the dispute. We've been nothing but patient with him (continually attempting to explain Wikipedia's consensus-based editing), and now we've been asked to participate in a dispute resolution process. So we've taken the time to provide honest accounts of the situation (containing no ad hominems, epithets, name-calling, etc.), only to have them deemed "personal attacks" and hidden from view.
I don't know what was expected of us. If we addressed the wrong aspects of the dispute or committed some other procedural error, it's reasonable to bring this to our attention. Instead, you've accused us of violating one of Wikipedia's core policies by engaging in personal attacks (an accusation of misconduct far more serious than anything that Kevin and I attributed to Joe). If this is how users responding to requests in good faith are treated, I'm not inclined to do so in the future. — David Levy 04:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Enough! I have never accused either of you of actually breaking any part of the NPA policy, I merely used it to show my reasoning for commenting on content, NOT THE CONTRIBUTOR. If you have any further questions regarding the DR/N as a whole, or of my conduct as a DR/N volunteer, then take it to the DR/N talk page. I will regard any further attempts to discuss such things on my talkpage as attempting to harass me. Go resolve your dispute and may we never have to cross paths again if this is how you treat those that disagree with you. I am removing the cot-cob templates that I placed and placing a note that I will not be participating in any way for the discussion. Farewell, adiou, don't hound me, Drcrazy102 ( talk) 23:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
I noticed you corrected my link at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. That's fine. However, this[ rule] does not allow it. I don not mind myself, but other users may get angry. So be careful! 68.100.116.118 ( talk) 02:03, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 22:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mysticism. Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I suggest that you read Wikipedia:No personal attacks#Avoiding personal attacks, wherein it's noted that arguments "should be directed at content and actions" (emphasis added). Kevin and I described Joe's actions, which are fundamental to the dispute. We've been nothing but patient with him (continually attempting to explain Wikipedia's consensus-based editing), and now we've been asked to participate in a dispute resolution process. So we've taken the time to provide honest accounts of the situation (containing no ad hominems, epithets, name-calling, etc.), only to have them deemed "personal attacks" and hidden from view.
I don't know what was expected of us. If we addressed the wrong aspects of the dispute or committed some other procedural error, it's reasonable to bring this to our attention. Instead, you've accused us of violating one of Wikipedia's core policies by engaging in personal attacks (an accusation of misconduct far more serious than anything that Kevin and I attributed to Joe). If this is how users responding to requests in good faith are treated, I'm not inclined to do so in the future. — David Levy 04:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Enough! I have never accused either of you of actually breaking any part of the NPA policy, I merely used it to show my reasoning for commenting on content, NOT THE CONTRIBUTOR. If you have any further questions regarding the DR/N as a whole, or of my conduct as a DR/N volunteer, then take it to the DR/N talk page. I will regard any further attempts to discuss such things on my talkpage as attempting to harass me. Go resolve your dispute and may we never have to cross paths again if this is how you treat those that disagree with you. I am removing the cot-cob templates that I placed and placing a note that I will not be participating in any way for the discussion. Farewell, adiou, don't hound me, Drcrazy102 ( talk) 23:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)