We go by polices, not "logic" or "facts" or "arguments" (see WP:NOTDUMB), we go by wp:rs and wp:or, as well as wp:undue and wp:npov. What we are not is a wp:soapbox or wp:forum for what users think or feel. Slatersteven ( talk) 09:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to COVID-19, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Bon courage ( talk) 18:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
— Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 01:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
— Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 01:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Positive feedback, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Runaway. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
Talk:Antifeminism. Thank you. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
07:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a soapbox, chat forum, or platform to right great wrongs. If you have identified a problem with the way articles are written, then you can try to change the relevant policies at the village pump. However, simply accusing others of "bias" is likely to lead to your account being blocked indefinitely as evidence of your not being here to build an encyclopedia as well as a prohibited personal attack. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 22:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Talk:Graham Hancock. Violation of the blocking policy. "
I've been given the boot from Wikipedia before, for being experienced as attacking another user... in my view they essentially proved me right by banning me".
Binksternet (
talk)
03:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Doug Weller
talk
11:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)We go by polices, not "logic" or "facts" or "arguments" (see WP:NOTDUMB), we go by wp:rs and wp:or, as well as wp:undue and wp:npov. What we are not is a wp:soapbox or wp:forum for what users think or feel. Slatersteven ( talk) 09:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to COVID-19, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Bon courage ( talk) 18:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
— Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 01:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
— Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 01:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Positive feedback, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Runaway. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
Talk:Antifeminism. Thank you. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
07:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a soapbox, chat forum, or platform to right great wrongs. If you have identified a problem with the way articles are written, then you can try to change the relevant policies at the village pump. However, simply accusing others of "bias" is likely to lead to your account being blocked indefinitely as evidence of your not being here to build an encyclopedia as well as a prohibited personal attack. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 22:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Talk:Graham Hancock. Violation of the blocking policy. "
I've been given the boot from Wikipedia before, for being experienced as attacking another user... in my view they essentially proved me right by banning me".
Binksternet (
talk)
03:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Doug Weller
talk
11:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)