![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 |
The OP found a solution to his problem
|
---|
With regard to your response to my comments on the Welsh Not talk page - this was my very first venture into Wikipedia. I take your point about Wikipedia not being a place for discussions or personal chit-chat. I was not in fact simply enjoying a leisurely trip down memory lane, I was trying to use what had happened to me during my schooldays to illustrate a contrast between my experiences and those of other people mentioned on the talk page and as such, it was relevant to the subject. I found your opening remarks patronising and rude, in short, uncivil. Take another look at those initial few lines and consider whether that is a helpful or appropriate way to address a fellow Wikipedia user, even more so when it a person's first-ever post. I cannot comment on your remarks about the so-called 'English Not' as I have no knowledge of it and I note that you do not include any references with regard to the information you give. Further, since you included your comments on the Talk page for the 'Welsh Not' and not the 'English Not', I consider them to be irrelevant, inappropriate and ill-considered. There is also something of an anti-Welsh sentiment about your remarks, which, as I am sure you did not intend this, you should guard against. Don't worry, I will not let your incivility put me off posting on Wikipedia in the future.( Honeybunch44 ( talk) 18:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC))
Have you missed the point again? If you read my above comments again (which you probably will not as you apparently already know everything) you will see that I acknowledge that Wikipedia is not the place for "editor's own personal recollections" and I am not disputing this. What I wished to address was a)your ignorant and aggressive response to my original post and b) your inclusion of some irrelevant, unreferenced and uncomfortably prejudiced remarks about an issue which had no place on that page. You have signally failed to either acknowledge or address these points, choosing to simply repeat yourself, with added rudeness, regarding something I had already acknowledged. May I politely ask you, once again, to address the issues I have raised in a civil manner. ( Honeybunch44 ( talk) 09:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC))
Ha ha, another smart and witty response from Demiurge! But you're not smart and witty are you, you're just a bully; I see from your user page that, on numerous occasions, you have been warned by other Wikipedia editors about your behaviour. You appear to be an intelligent man and knowledgeable within your fields of interest, but it's about time you learned some emotional maturity and stopped being aggressive towards anyone who holds differing views or opinions from yourself. You can respond to my comments or not, as you wish, it makes no difference to me because I shall not be reading any more of your posts. I, unlike you, get no pleasure from confrontation and unpleasantness. Happy bullying, my friend, may it bring you everything you so richly deserve. ( Honeybunch44 ( talk) 08:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)) |
Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello ! Since You made a comment about me at his talk page, I bid You welcome to read my full reply and appology. Boeing720 ( talk) 05:30, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
-- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 20:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello there User:Demiurge1000! I just wanted to let you know that I have undone your recent revert over at Bob Crow. Now, I don't want to edit war about this (because what's the point in fighting; we're both busy in real life) but I should make it clear that I am more than happy to discuss the situation over at the talk page in a pleasant, civilised manner :). Kind regards, Midnightblueowl ( talk) 14:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear reviewer,
Thank you for reviewing my article titled "diaosi". I really appreciate your efficiency and adaptability. But I am afraid you have not given me the reasons why my article is refused to be published. You said that I can study your rejection as an audience study.It make some sense. But the situation is that the assignment requests me to study the audiences who will read or comment my article published on wiki. Maybe my non-standard English has generated some misunderstandings between us. If the article is rejected because of violating copyrights or some other reasons, could you please elaborate on it to me? I will try my best to edit it until it conforms to the standard of publication. I really appreciate your kindly help and wish you all the best! Yours, Xiuyue (For your convenience, here is the link of my article: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/diaosi )
Mindhunter333 ( talk) 02:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear Demiurge1000, I am writing to tell you that my article has been published, so you need not bother to answer my previous questions. Though you have rejected my article, I really appreciate your devotion to this volunteer job. I know my article is far from perfect, so your precious suggestions of my article will be whole-heartedly listen to. Thank you again for your time and patience! Wish you all the best, Yours, Xiuyue Mindhunter333 ( talk) 20:35, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
FYI I looked at your CSD request on the image and pulled the source from flickr. It's credited to a NASA employee which makes it public domain. I've retagged it correctly with the PD-NASA template. -- Tawker ( talk) 17:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
I've just started a new section at ANI here, after the latest personal attacks and threats from this user. Voceditenore ( talk) 12:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
This Barnstar is awarded to Demiurge1000 for copy edits totalling over 12,000 words during the GOCE March 2014 copy edit drive. Your efforts are appreciated! Diannaa ( talk) 19:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for your help regarding protocols for images and copyrights.
Left Coast Arts ( talk) 17:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Dear User:Demiurge1000, thanks for the message! I do apologize for the mistake. I was using Lupin's Vandal Tool and from a quick glance, it appeared the IP was deleting referenced content. That's why I performed the revert. That being said, I did leave a message on the user's talk page stating "If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page". Rather than doing this however, the IP took the situation to AN/I. I hope this clears things up. With regards, Anupam Talk 18:35, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Demiurge1000. I thought it more appropriate to ask you this question here rather than on the talk page of Joachim Peiper since it's a question more in response to how you see things (though I probably could've posted it there, but I'm already here, so will see it through). Anyway, you said (excerpted):
"If the article were up for a featured article nomination I (and probably others) would point out that...If someone wanted to take the time to improve this from C to B or GA-class, sorting out the lead would be one thing they'd need to do."
Is this to say that the main criteria on which the article would fail classification review is its lack of a "sorted out" lead, or is the current state of the lead just one of many things that need improving? And who would review the article for that class upgrade in the first place, and how do you go about getting their attention/interest? Can any editor/user suggest/nominate an article to be reviewed, or do you have to rally interest from editors who've already been working on the article? Thanks for your time. Cheers. JDanek007 Talk 05:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
I figured I'd mention this here and if you wanted to continue the discussion that would be OK with me, but don't feel an obligation.
Policy and guidelines are not a description only. It's direction. If you feel that ignoring all the rules is a basic part of Wikipedia maybe you didn't realize the emphasis of IAR is ONLY when a policy or guideline stands in the way of improving Wikipedia. Altering someone else's posts is actually a pretty bad violation of a behavioral guideline. While it isn't a bright line rule, it isn't a suggestion, a recommendation or a description....it is how we are expected to behave and are literally given the guidance through our policies and guidelines. In this specific guideline we are actually directed to never strike out another's comments. I'm not an administrator and I do see that many of them are actually unaware of this particular guideline but it is there and it is a rather important part of collaboration. Remember, this isn't really your page (nor is my own talk page actually mine) these pages belong to the community. The community has set the standards and, sure...this one may be so low key to many that it slips by them but...it is something to think about.-- Mark Miller ( talk) 10:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, If you're interested I'm attempting to get Greed promoted to FA again.-- Deoliveirafan ( talk) 02:22, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olchfa School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Jones ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion. Point well taken and changes made. 71.139.142.249 ( talk) 21:41, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Sip 'n Dip Lounge is at GAN. I need wikicup points before the end of the current round or I'm SOL. Just saying.... ;-) Montanabw (talk) 00:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
I have been looking through certain histories of articles that have been revised. But what I have noticed is that there are previous revisions that have got past experiences which may cause an individual to go irate. My question is, is there any chance to delete an article and restart it by giving it a new fresh start in history revision? Because I want to know if this can prevent an individual's reputation being damaged. ( Okolanda ( talk) 20:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC))
I was thinking about de-emphasizing the Billy Bob Thornton interview much more than it is now. I noticed that you'd just been adjusting it, and I don't want you to think I was working against your contribution. From a little more research it looks like it was written from a POV similar to Jian Ghomeshi's PR team and given the amount of weight they would give it. It's an interesting dueweight problem, but I still think it's weird to blow it up more than any other bio data about him, positive or negative, including his Academy Award win etc. You can let me know if you're happy with it as it stands, but otherwise I'm going to try to make it more proportionate to the career and coverage (For comparison, I took a look at Tom Cruise's more-defining and noted media meltdown on Oprah's couch, and it rated a sentence.) __ E L A Q U E A T E 21:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I appreciate your edits to this article. I just wanted to state that I was also editing it, but lost my edits due to an edit conflict appearing while you were also editing it. Now, I've lost all my additions. I'll come back later. Thanks, Daniellagreen ( talk) 18:28, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your recent advice about creating new articles for parks, I did the amnesia test on both parks and I got different results for the two. With Crowcroft, I managed to only find one source from Manchester City Council ( here) but nothing too much about it's history or present events. I'm assuming it wouldn't be a good idea to start an article for it as the test showed up as the park being quite unpopular. Results with Birchfields however came out quite good with a Manchester City Council information page, this link with it's history from 1900 and how it was shaped to become the park it is now and a few news reports where a death occured, all from the first page of search. I'm assuming this would pass the test but because this is my first time creating an article, I just need some reassurance. Thanks. CorrectiveMeasures ( talk) 21:57, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 25 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Landing at Anzac Cove, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the 1915 landing at Anzac Cove on Turkey's Gallipoli peninsula is marked on 25 April each year by a dawn service at the cove (pictured), attended by 50,000 people in 2013? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Landing at Anzac Cove. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 06:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Another account from Special:Contributions/Higo1 did the same pattern of dance-pop. 183.171.177.156 ( talk) 00:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Following your edits to King John's Hunting Lodge, Axbridge I have asked a question at Wikipedia:Good article help#Review - not sure if process has been followed. about the process and would appreciate your input.— Rod talk 17:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
This discussion relates to an edit you made. [2] Niteshift36 ( talk) 00:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello Demiurge1000,
Thanks for the explanation. Whilst I understand the point that I am "affiliated," surely promoting my book for interested readers to seek out is not a biased action.
Shameless marketing, yes, but "conflict of interest" ?
Christopherwils ( talk) 15:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, friend. I noticed you twice removed the text regarding the documentary's reviews and regards because you claim it's POV pushing and unsourced. The latter is true, but the first is not. I don't know if you are an historian or have watched a great deal of documentaries regarding World War II, but please believe me when I say it's very common knowledge among series historians and experts. Of course this claim must be cited, but I have yet to find the prober source. It would be like deleting a sentence that said: "Adolf Hitler was a bad man" because it didn't, at the currently time, have a reliable source. You should not have deleted the sentence. Jonas Vinther ( talk) 14:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Demiurge1000, Our BSA Council is in possession of Mounted Troop 2's flag, an unpublished account by CAPT O'Connell of his time in the mounted troop, and his obituary. Perhaps I erred in haste when changing "oldest" and "only" in the original article, but those are absolutes that may not end up being true. If you leave my note alone, which highlights that there may be another earlier mounted troop in BSA history, I will agree that the original text in the article should stand - for now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASBoyes ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Demiurge1000: Thank you for the cookies, and I have a lot of learning to do. ( Well Appointed ( talk) 03:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC))
| Hi Demiurge1000, on 3 May 2014 at 21:28, (UTC) you accepted a request made at the GOCE Requests page to copy-edit the article Bonnie Tyler. You have not yet begun editing the article. Please tell us whether you intend to copy-edit the article so the request can be left alone or returned to the list for someone else to work on. If no update is received and you make no edits to the article in seven days, a GOCE coordinator will strike your acceptance and return the request to the list. Thank you. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 00:02, 10 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thanks you for your help!!!
PercyJackson.12 ( talk) 15:46, 11 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks for your help!!! PercyJackson.12 ( talk) 15:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PercyJackson.12 ( talk) 15:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
Thanks for all the help!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PercyJackson.12 ( talk) 15:50, 11 May 2014 (UTC) |
You accepted this AFC submission. Another editor found copyright issues with it. You may want to see the discussions at User talk:Joe Decker#Jarekus Singleton update? and Talk:Jarekus Singleton. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 21:29, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
I apologise for any inconvenience I may have caused in the process of alleged vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.100.5.210 ( talk) 04:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 |
The OP found a solution to his problem
|
---|
With regard to your response to my comments on the Welsh Not talk page - this was my very first venture into Wikipedia. I take your point about Wikipedia not being a place for discussions or personal chit-chat. I was not in fact simply enjoying a leisurely trip down memory lane, I was trying to use what had happened to me during my schooldays to illustrate a contrast between my experiences and those of other people mentioned on the talk page and as such, it was relevant to the subject. I found your opening remarks patronising and rude, in short, uncivil. Take another look at those initial few lines and consider whether that is a helpful or appropriate way to address a fellow Wikipedia user, even more so when it a person's first-ever post. I cannot comment on your remarks about the so-called 'English Not' as I have no knowledge of it and I note that you do not include any references with regard to the information you give. Further, since you included your comments on the Talk page for the 'Welsh Not' and not the 'English Not', I consider them to be irrelevant, inappropriate and ill-considered. There is also something of an anti-Welsh sentiment about your remarks, which, as I am sure you did not intend this, you should guard against. Don't worry, I will not let your incivility put me off posting on Wikipedia in the future.( Honeybunch44 ( talk) 18:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC))
Have you missed the point again? If you read my above comments again (which you probably will not as you apparently already know everything) you will see that I acknowledge that Wikipedia is not the place for "editor's own personal recollections" and I am not disputing this. What I wished to address was a)your ignorant and aggressive response to my original post and b) your inclusion of some irrelevant, unreferenced and uncomfortably prejudiced remarks about an issue which had no place on that page. You have signally failed to either acknowledge or address these points, choosing to simply repeat yourself, with added rudeness, regarding something I had already acknowledged. May I politely ask you, once again, to address the issues I have raised in a civil manner. ( Honeybunch44 ( talk) 09:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC))
Ha ha, another smart and witty response from Demiurge! But you're not smart and witty are you, you're just a bully; I see from your user page that, on numerous occasions, you have been warned by other Wikipedia editors about your behaviour. You appear to be an intelligent man and knowledgeable within your fields of interest, but it's about time you learned some emotional maturity and stopped being aggressive towards anyone who holds differing views or opinions from yourself. You can respond to my comments or not, as you wish, it makes no difference to me because I shall not be reading any more of your posts. I, unlike you, get no pleasure from confrontation and unpleasantness. Happy bullying, my friend, may it bring you everything you so richly deserve. ( Honeybunch44 ( talk) 08:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)) |
Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello ! Since You made a comment about me at his talk page, I bid You welcome to read my full reply and appology. Boeing720 ( talk) 05:30, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
-- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 20:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello there User:Demiurge1000! I just wanted to let you know that I have undone your recent revert over at Bob Crow. Now, I don't want to edit war about this (because what's the point in fighting; we're both busy in real life) but I should make it clear that I am more than happy to discuss the situation over at the talk page in a pleasant, civilised manner :). Kind regards, Midnightblueowl ( talk) 14:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear reviewer,
Thank you for reviewing my article titled "diaosi". I really appreciate your efficiency and adaptability. But I am afraid you have not given me the reasons why my article is refused to be published. You said that I can study your rejection as an audience study.It make some sense. But the situation is that the assignment requests me to study the audiences who will read or comment my article published on wiki. Maybe my non-standard English has generated some misunderstandings between us. If the article is rejected because of violating copyrights or some other reasons, could you please elaborate on it to me? I will try my best to edit it until it conforms to the standard of publication. I really appreciate your kindly help and wish you all the best! Yours, Xiuyue (For your convenience, here is the link of my article: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/diaosi )
Mindhunter333 ( talk) 02:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear Demiurge1000, I am writing to tell you that my article has been published, so you need not bother to answer my previous questions. Though you have rejected my article, I really appreciate your devotion to this volunteer job. I know my article is far from perfect, so your precious suggestions of my article will be whole-heartedly listen to. Thank you again for your time and patience! Wish you all the best, Yours, Xiuyue Mindhunter333 ( talk) 20:35, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
FYI I looked at your CSD request on the image and pulled the source from flickr. It's credited to a NASA employee which makes it public domain. I've retagged it correctly with the PD-NASA template. -- Tawker ( talk) 17:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
I've just started a new section at ANI here, after the latest personal attacks and threats from this user. Voceditenore ( talk) 12:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
This Barnstar is awarded to Demiurge1000 for copy edits totalling over 12,000 words during the GOCE March 2014 copy edit drive. Your efforts are appreciated! Diannaa ( talk) 19:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for your help regarding protocols for images and copyrights.
Left Coast Arts ( talk) 17:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Dear User:Demiurge1000, thanks for the message! I do apologize for the mistake. I was using Lupin's Vandal Tool and from a quick glance, it appeared the IP was deleting referenced content. That's why I performed the revert. That being said, I did leave a message on the user's talk page stating "If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page". Rather than doing this however, the IP took the situation to AN/I. I hope this clears things up. With regards, Anupam Talk 18:35, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Demiurge1000. I thought it more appropriate to ask you this question here rather than on the talk page of Joachim Peiper since it's a question more in response to how you see things (though I probably could've posted it there, but I'm already here, so will see it through). Anyway, you said (excerpted):
"If the article were up for a featured article nomination I (and probably others) would point out that...If someone wanted to take the time to improve this from C to B or GA-class, sorting out the lead would be one thing they'd need to do."
Is this to say that the main criteria on which the article would fail classification review is its lack of a "sorted out" lead, or is the current state of the lead just one of many things that need improving? And who would review the article for that class upgrade in the first place, and how do you go about getting their attention/interest? Can any editor/user suggest/nominate an article to be reviewed, or do you have to rally interest from editors who've already been working on the article? Thanks for your time. Cheers. JDanek007 Talk 05:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
I figured I'd mention this here and if you wanted to continue the discussion that would be OK with me, but don't feel an obligation.
Policy and guidelines are not a description only. It's direction. If you feel that ignoring all the rules is a basic part of Wikipedia maybe you didn't realize the emphasis of IAR is ONLY when a policy or guideline stands in the way of improving Wikipedia. Altering someone else's posts is actually a pretty bad violation of a behavioral guideline. While it isn't a bright line rule, it isn't a suggestion, a recommendation or a description....it is how we are expected to behave and are literally given the guidance through our policies and guidelines. In this specific guideline we are actually directed to never strike out another's comments. I'm not an administrator and I do see that many of them are actually unaware of this particular guideline but it is there and it is a rather important part of collaboration. Remember, this isn't really your page (nor is my own talk page actually mine) these pages belong to the community. The community has set the standards and, sure...this one may be so low key to many that it slips by them but...it is something to think about.-- Mark Miller ( talk) 10:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, If you're interested I'm attempting to get Greed promoted to FA again.-- Deoliveirafan ( talk) 02:22, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olchfa School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Jones ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion. Point well taken and changes made. 71.139.142.249 ( talk) 21:41, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Sip 'n Dip Lounge is at GAN. I need wikicup points before the end of the current round or I'm SOL. Just saying.... ;-) Montanabw (talk) 00:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
I have been looking through certain histories of articles that have been revised. But what I have noticed is that there are previous revisions that have got past experiences which may cause an individual to go irate. My question is, is there any chance to delete an article and restart it by giving it a new fresh start in history revision? Because I want to know if this can prevent an individual's reputation being damaged. ( Okolanda ( talk) 20:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC))
I was thinking about de-emphasizing the Billy Bob Thornton interview much more than it is now. I noticed that you'd just been adjusting it, and I don't want you to think I was working against your contribution. From a little more research it looks like it was written from a POV similar to Jian Ghomeshi's PR team and given the amount of weight they would give it. It's an interesting dueweight problem, but I still think it's weird to blow it up more than any other bio data about him, positive or negative, including his Academy Award win etc. You can let me know if you're happy with it as it stands, but otherwise I'm going to try to make it more proportionate to the career and coverage (For comparison, I took a look at Tom Cruise's more-defining and noted media meltdown on Oprah's couch, and it rated a sentence.) __ E L A Q U E A T E 21:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I appreciate your edits to this article. I just wanted to state that I was also editing it, but lost my edits due to an edit conflict appearing while you were also editing it. Now, I've lost all my additions. I'll come back later. Thanks, Daniellagreen ( talk) 18:28, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your recent advice about creating new articles for parks, I did the amnesia test on both parks and I got different results for the two. With Crowcroft, I managed to only find one source from Manchester City Council ( here) but nothing too much about it's history or present events. I'm assuming it wouldn't be a good idea to start an article for it as the test showed up as the park being quite unpopular. Results with Birchfields however came out quite good with a Manchester City Council information page, this link with it's history from 1900 and how it was shaped to become the park it is now and a few news reports where a death occured, all from the first page of search. I'm assuming this would pass the test but because this is my first time creating an article, I just need some reassurance. Thanks. CorrectiveMeasures ( talk) 21:57, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 25 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Landing at Anzac Cove, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the 1915 landing at Anzac Cove on Turkey's Gallipoli peninsula is marked on 25 April each year by a dawn service at the cove (pictured), attended by 50,000 people in 2013? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Landing at Anzac Cove. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 06:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Another account from Special:Contributions/Higo1 did the same pattern of dance-pop. 183.171.177.156 ( talk) 00:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Following your edits to King John's Hunting Lodge, Axbridge I have asked a question at Wikipedia:Good article help#Review - not sure if process has been followed. about the process and would appreciate your input.— Rod talk 17:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
This discussion relates to an edit you made. [2] Niteshift36 ( talk) 00:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello Demiurge1000,
Thanks for the explanation. Whilst I understand the point that I am "affiliated," surely promoting my book for interested readers to seek out is not a biased action.
Shameless marketing, yes, but "conflict of interest" ?
Christopherwils ( talk) 15:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, friend. I noticed you twice removed the text regarding the documentary's reviews and regards because you claim it's POV pushing and unsourced. The latter is true, but the first is not. I don't know if you are an historian or have watched a great deal of documentaries regarding World War II, but please believe me when I say it's very common knowledge among series historians and experts. Of course this claim must be cited, but I have yet to find the prober source. It would be like deleting a sentence that said: "Adolf Hitler was a bad man" because it didn't, at the currently time, have a reliable source. You should not have deleted the sentence. Jonas Vinther ( talk) 14:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Demiurge1000, Our BSA Council is in possession of Mounted Troop 2's flag, an unpublished account by CAPT O'Connell of his time in the mounted troop, and his obituary. Perhaps I erred in haste when changing "oldest" and "only" in the original article, but those are absolutes that may not end up being true. If you leave my note alone, which highlights that there may be another earlier mounted troop in BSA history, I will agree that the original text in the article should stand - for now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASBoyes ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Demiurge1000: Thank you for the cookies, and I have a lot of learning to do. ( Well Appointed ( talk) 03:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC))
| Hi Demiurge1000, on 3 May 2014 at 21:28, (UTC) you accepted a request made at the GOCE Requests page to copy-edit the article Bonnie Tyler. You have not yet begun editing the article. Please tell us whether you intend to copy-edit the article so the request can be left alone or returned to the list for someone else to work on. If no update is received and you make no edits to the article in seven days, a GOCE coordinator will strike your acceptance and return the request to the list. Thank you. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 00:02, 10 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thanks you for your help!!!
PercyJackson.12 ( talk) 15:46, 11 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks for your help!!! PercyJackson.12 ( talk) 15:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PercyJackson.12 ( talk) 15:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
Thanks for all the help!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PercyJackson.12 ( talk) 15:50, 11 May 2014 (UTC) |
You accepted this AFC submission. Another editor found copyright issues with it. You may want to see the discussions at User talk:Joe Decker#Jarekus Singleton update? and Talk:Jarekus Singleton. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 21:29, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
I apologise for any inconvenience I may have caused in the process of alleged vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.100.5.210 ( talk) 04:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)