This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
You suggested that I mention when I set up for my own review so I have done so now, also I have a few people who I am waiting on replies from using the template that I mentioned on the WP:ER page. Even after I have got my review I will still be happy to help other Editors out (especially if I can get better at it) because I have enjoyed the 3 I have done so far. %% -SYKKO-%% ( talk to me) 04:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey there! Subarachnoid hemorrhage is on the edge of FA status, and I was wondering if you could provide a source (sources?) for Image:SAH incidence graph.svg (both inline and in the image description page, please :) Thanks, and looking forward to your next GA/FA, Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 19:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
-- Mifter ( talk) 03:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
I've done a bit more. I'm afraid real-life is interfering with my WP time and I'm also trying to respond to a GA review of ketogenic diet. So, I'm going to be real slow. I see you've got another review and there are plenty other folk if you need feedback quickly. If you have concerns about your sources being up to FA level, try User:Eubulides. Cheers, Colin° Talk 13:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, delldot, I haven't found time to continue reviewing it. I won't have time in the next couple of days and then I'm on holiday for a week. Have you tried printing the article, and reading it out loud? You could ask User:GrahamColm for an opinion. Good luck! Colin° Talk 14:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
At Magnetic resonance neurography? I was cleaning up the references and it turns out that clearly the contributor ( Afiller ( talk · contribs)) is one of the inventor of the technology. While I don't think there is much COI going on, I figure it'd be best if someone with a more medical background had a look. Circeus ( talk) 17:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
SAH is FA. I'd stuff your userpage with barnstars, but I think even that would be an inadequate sign of appreciation. Keep up the brilliant work. JFW | T@lk 19:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
-- Bedford Pray 09:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
I award you this barnstar for helping me to learn the process of reviewing other editors, and for giving me great advice on my Editor Review I have learned alot from you through both processes and just wanted you to know that I appreciate it%% -SYKKO-%% ( talk to me) 15:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC) |
I am just waiting on trying to get a map but have the content just about right. A quick look-over to alert me to any grammar or flow glitches would be much appreciated... :) Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 22:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
pick 1 from the following: 1/you have been exceedingly busy, mostly with subarachnoid haemorrhage. 2/ you have just been letting me figure out for myself that the idea i proposed 10 days ago was too clever by half (with clever, in this case, not being a +). 3/ i have somehow given offence. that said, i have an odd situation here. i have a reference with an only copyright date of 1928. (don't worry, it's not on medicine.)i know for sure that my copy dates much later than that. on the copyright page it has the usual 'all rights reserved, no reproduction ,blah, blah, blah. my understanding of copyright law is that the copyright on this should have expired in 1998. i would like to be able to make pretty much free use of this in an article, including some pix.it's one of the major references in its field. any thoughts? advice? pax vobiscum. Toyokuni3 ( talk) 14:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
So I spent some time playing around with the image map extension. I have already put it to use. with the help of Wikipe-tan and the Trifecta I have created a great little adaptation to the image on the WP:TRI page.
Thanks again for all your help! %% -SYKKO-%% ( talk to me) 21:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, the article has been reposted and is virtually identical to the original one that was deleted. I've nominated it for speedy deletion. If it gets re-created a third time I would suggest blocking it from recreation. Zazaban ( talk) 20:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
She's now trying to argue that the deletion of the Anarchist International article is an act of vandalism and I am being called a vandal. Also, she's claiming that the anon who blanked my userpage and tried to sabotage the vote is not a vandal. Zazaban ( talk) 20:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
The pulmonary contusion stuff from Grainger and Allison is from Ch 20... I don't know how to indicate this with the template. I use an online edition so I have no page numbers. Antelan 02:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
"sometimes I eat peanut butter and jelly with no bread"
Yeah! I saw that! :O
— CycloneNimrod Talk? 16:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Good luck! Although I'm not sure who your "chest trauma experts" are. I'm a pulmonologist, not a trauma surgeon. ;-) Axl ( talk) 18:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
At my "user talk" I have quoted several newspaper-articles (~from paper editions, etc) and a book as independent sources to the Anarchist International page. Take a look at it and see if it is enough independent sources to put up the Anarchist International page again. In case you have other comments I would be glad to hear it. I can of course change the content a bit if you mean it is still not compatible with the Wikipedia standard, just give me a hint.( Anna Quist ( talk) 21:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC))
I have recreated the Anarchist International Wikipedia page in a Anna Quist sandbox page for discussion and perhaps changes, to reach a consensus, for later to publish it (based on general consent). Feel free to make comments. The sooner we can reach consensus and publishing, the better. ( Anna Quist ( talk) 22:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC))
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International
( Anna Quist ( talk) 22:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)).
Hi,
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.
Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader,
geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at
geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!
The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.
Thank You, BCeagle0312 ( talk) 03:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
What a pleasure it was to see your image added to traumatic diaphragmatic hernia, only moments after I created the article. Keep up the good work. -- Arcadian ( talk) 19:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
To delldot. You wrote:"If you want, I can mark the sentences in your sandbox that I think need citations." I think this is a good idea. Hope you have time soon to do it, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International for placing comments. I have also updated relevant information on my talk page( Anna Quist ( talk) 13:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC))
Hi again Dell, I hope you are well. I know images aren't your area but I thought I would ask anyways. :) On the article Quackwatch there is the logo there for the official website. How would I go about finding out if it should be in the article and not copyright protected? I would appreciate your help if you know. If you do not know, not a problem either. I am just curious how to do this for use overall in Wikipedia. Thanks and no rush, I won't be online here for much longer. -- CrohnieGal Talk 16:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
{{logo fur | Article = | Use = <!--Choose: Infobox / Org / Brand / Product --> | Used for = | Owner = | Website = | History = | Commentary = | Description = | Source = | Portion = | Low_resolution = | Purpose = <!--Must be specified if Use is not Infobox / Org / Brand / Product--> | Replaceability = | other_information = }}
Thanks, I appreciate the help again. I was going to delete it but I think fixing it to comply is even better.
How would I check if pictures in articles are Fair use and not Copyright protection though? Is there a system to check this or would I have to go to the download site and then see where it came from and go there to see if it is protected? It's too early for me to do this now, need a couple cups of coffee at least, but I will try what you told me and get back to you so you can check what I did to make sure I did it correctly. Thanks my friend, I always appreciate your help, -- CrohnieGal Talk 10:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the comments Delldot. I will change my proposal to a new Anarchist International Wikipedia page according to your advice. I will also work with the anarchist historian H. Fagerhus and the International Institute for Organization Research to get sources to the relevant documents regarding the decisions of IFA-IAF-AI congresses and other meetings and from the International Anarchist Tribunal. We also have the e-mail source where the southern IFA-federation's secretary states the AI is lunatic. That speaks for itself. When I have made a new proposal I hope you have time to take a look at it, i.e. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International , again, for new comments. ( Anna Quist ( talk) 18:06, 20 July 2008 (UTC)).
OK - we will drop the quote from the e-mail stating the AI is lunatic. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Anna Quist (
talk •
contribs)
18:21, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi there,
When I read your discussion, I can understand the problem. Now I am editing this topic (INTI College Sabah - Programmes) all over again. Also now I am trying editing to explain what this courses are all about by using my own words and not from the advertisement and brochures. So please check and see whether my work is alright or not so that I will be on a right track.
Also, there is one question I would like to ask, is it ok to plot down the list of subjects for each course (except English Improvement Programme) so that the people who surf the Wikipedia website will know what this courses are all about?
Many Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pisceslalena ( talk • contribs) 05:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on bringing it to FA. [And thanks for the barnstar. Much appreciated.] Axl ( talk) 06:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Delldot, I think my last response to your GA review comments on Mental status examination might have been ungracious. Your comments and advice have in fact been very helpful and I think the article is vastly better as a consequence. I have also learnt a lot from the process. I was just getting a bit tired of the whole thing, and had other stuff to do, but I have since gone back and done a bit more (including adding some cool images) ... and I've had another look at WP:GACR and I do think it is good enough for GA ... would you mind having another look? Anonymaus ( talk) 11:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Not much up with me at all, my friend. On-wiki, I've been spending most of my time trying to diversify my skills. Off-wiki, my life kind of revolves around my upcoming wedding in a couple of months. So I guess things are peachy.
So, 'sup wit u? I see you're still kicking butt left and right on this delldot-pedia. Hope everything A-OK off-wiki.
Thanks for hitting me up the way you did. I think it's sweet that you remembered.
Peace! SWik78 ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello Delldot! Together with H. Fagerhus, the well known Norwegian anarchist historian, I have made a new proposal to the The Anarchist International Wikipedia page, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International
I hope this is according to the guidelines of Wikipedia, and that it should be published. However if you have any new proposals for improvement, it is very welcome. All things can be imropeved.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 14:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC))
Hello Delldot. I will add a chapter about Further readings with weight on third party sources. I am a bit confused about how I shall do it. Can you give me some advice and perhaps give a link with an example on how this is done? ( Anna Quist ( talk) 17:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)).
Thank you for the advice about creating a chapter on Further readings. However I would like to see a good Wikipedia page that has such a section, so I can make a similar chapter. Can you provide me with a couple of relevant links to Wikipedia articles?
Material about Anarchist International (IFA -IAF- AI) organizations and their resolutions, are published in several articles of the CRIFA bulletin in English, French and Spanish, in the French (FAF) anarchist paper Le Monde Libertaire, and in The Italian anarchist paper Humanita Nova. How shall I quote these? They are not available online, it is paper editions. Shall I translate to English, or is it ok to quote the article names in French, Spanish and Italian? ( Anna Quist ( talk) 18:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC))
I have looked at the two pages you mentioned, and will create a Further readings section.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 21:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)).
Hello Delldeot
The section with Further readings is finnished. What is your opinion? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International ( Anna Quist ( talk) 23:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)).
Hello Delldot. As mentioned I have made a Further readings section with reliable third party sources and also added several external links, mostly with independent third party sources, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International. I think the page is ready for publication. I would like to hear your opinion.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 08:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)).
Hello Delldot. Speedy deletion oh The Anarchist International Wikipedia page?
I posted the new The Anarchist International Wikipedia page, but it was tagged with speedy deletion. I protested the deletion at the talkpage. What do you mean I shall do now? I need help or else it will probably be deleted( Anna Quist ( talk) 12:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)).
Hello Delldot. The new AI page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anarchist_International is deleted. I have however asked adminstrator Alex.muller to send me a copy of it. Perhaps I can publish it on another site. Is there any possiblity to recover it on the Wikipedia? Please give me some advice. I and Fagerhus have put some effort in making a good page, so we are a bit disappointed. We are also interested to know who, and on what ground, the deleting is done.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 13:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC))
Hello Delldot. The new AI page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anarchist_International is deleted. I have however asked adminstrator Alex.muller to send me a copy of it. Perhaps I can publish it on another site. Is there any possiblity to recover it on the Wikipedia? Please give me some advice. I and Fagerhus have put some effort in making a good page, so we are a bit disappointed. We are also interested to know who, and on what ground, the deleting is done.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 13:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC))
My ears are burning. Hi both of you, if I may jump in. My view is that any recreation of the article is almost doomed. As a non-admin I could not see the previous version to compare, I have to leave that to the reviewing admin. The fact that the original article page is salted shows that you are up againts a lot of -ve opinion. To get any chance of acceptance I think you would have to get all these people involved again and show that you are making a proper effort to keep within the guidelines, but how to do that ? Deletion review ? arbitration, request for comment, Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron ? I am almost tempted to say create the article and AfD it immediatly to get a discussion going before CsD - but that may not stop a speedy del any how. -- triwbe ( talk) 16:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi dell. Any chance of a bit of peer reviewing on this one? Casliber made a start but has become a bit overwhelmed by other things I think. Fainites barley 15:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I think the ce by Awadewit is pretty well done now, barring any last minute queries, so if you wish to have another look, that would be good. jimfbleak ( talk) 17:59, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
To Delldot et.al. The www.anarchy.no is the most scientific and reliable anarchist website on Internet. Thus when you say "Again, I don't consider anarchy.no to be a reliable source" I cannot agree with you. You have to explain why you distrust www.anarchy.no. What facts do you have that prove this point of view? The so called "anorg-warning" made by the marxists Jamal Hannah and Peter Bach? This is almost entirely false. We have rejected and turned this down about 100% at http://www.anarchy.no/anorgwarning.html . Try to be more matter of fact. Now please explain to me why you distrust www.anarchy.no. with sound, scientific, matter of fact arguments.
I don't know what the AfD is, but the AI-page is finished from Fagerhus and me, and we are interested in going all the way on Wikipedia, before we try to post it on another site. So try to undelete it and we will see what happens. Ask the relevant persons to undelete it.
What is the GFDL? As far as I know Fagerhus and I have the copyright to the page, we made it. Thanks for all the help, that will be credited, but we are the authors. The helpers on Wikipedia have also contributed with a small bit of input to new updates of the www.anarchy.no. That is fine. Our AI-Wikiedia page is the truth about the AI. If Wikipedia is not interested in the truth, we certainly will find others that are. By the way, consensus means a page should be deleted only if all agree. If a few can decide deletion, it is minority dictatorship. ( Anna Quist ( talk) 18:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC))
I have read WP:RS. It states a.o.t.:" 1. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are highly valued and usually the most reliable sources in areas where they are available, such as history, medicine and science, although some material may be outdated by more recent research, or controversial in the sense that there are alternative theories. 2. Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used in these areas, particularly if they are respected mainstream publications."
Ad 1. International Journal of Anarchism is the only scientific, academic and peer-reviewed anarchist journal in the world. Thus stuff from the IJA is meeting this criterion and standard fully. The IJA-stuff is not questioned by any other reliable academic journal, it is not controversial and not outdated. In fact several academic/university websites link up IJA, together with all the other main academic/scientific economic journals. Thus the criterion for independent third party sources is fulfilled. The following universities/academic pages list IJA:
US Oswego State University of New York's List of Economic Journals on the Web
International Journal of Anarchism ...
http://www.oswego.edu/~economic/journals.htm
CPA DIRECTORY INDEX LawResearch ... International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of the Economics of Business · International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems ...
http://www.lawresearchservices.com/firms/admin/cpa-econ-journals.htm
Resources and Links International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research · International Journal of Applied Econometrics and ...
http://www.crsp.com/resources/links.html
Benno Torgler - Researcher in Economics, Tax Compliance and Tax Morale International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Economics · International Journal of Business and Economics ...
http://www.torgler.com/benno/linksjournals.htm
Interneteki Ekonomi Dergileri ... International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Business and Economics · International Journal of the Economics of Business ...
http://www.seyfettinartan.gen.tr/journal.htm
Economic journals on the web ... International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies · International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Economics ...
http://cba.unomaha.edu/faculty/cdecker/WEB/Economic%20journals%20on%20the%20web.htm
ad 2. "Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used in these areas, particularly if they are respected mainstream publications." We have listed/quoted several newspaper/journal articles, a.o.t from Norway's largest newspaper and the two largest economic newspapers. Thus, this criterion is aslo fulfilled. We have also quoted articles in the most reliable and largest anarchist journals outside IJA, the French Le Monde Libertaire, and the multilingiual CRIFA bulletin. Also they are relevant non-academic sources.
Thus, both 1. and 2. are fulfilled: I cannot see why the AI-Wikipedia page should not pass the WP:RS test.
Just undelete the AI-Wikipedia and let it go through the WP:RS test: I am sure it will pass. I will of course also come up with more material and answer to questions if somebody have questions. We have more material/articles, than mentioned on the AI-Wikipedia page.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 17:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC))
It is all articles with resolutions from AI-organizations, thus they cover AI and its main policy. Could you please discuss this and put forward may case about undelete before the deleter, i.e. put in a good word for me? The deleter said there was not much change from the old page, but that is not true. I put up all the relevant sources, that was lacking in the first page. The oldest that was deleted, from 14. juli 2008 22:43, is thus quite differenr from the current version. You are the one of the admins that now this case best, and you know the routines here well....
( Anna Quist ( talk) 21:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC))
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 23:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I have made som major changes to the AI-Wikipedia page, and I am sure it will meet the WP:RS standards this time. The new material is:
"The International Journal of Anarchism (IJA), [17]the organ of AI and International Institute for Organization Research [18], the independent research institute of AI, is a Refereed scientific journal, and the only Refereed anarchist scientific journal in world, quoting from IJA's official website:
Articles to IJA may be written in any language, and should be provided with an English summary. If the article is written in English, the summary can be omitted.
International Journal of Anarchism is a Refereed scientific journal. Refereed materials are publications reviewed by "expert readers" or referees prior to the publication of the material. After reading and evaluating the material, the referee informs the publisher/editor if the document should be published or if any changes should be made prior to publication. Refereed materials are also referred to as Peer Reviewed. Refereed materials are significant to the research and the literature of library and information science because they assure readers that the information conveyed is reliable and timely. With some exceptions a refereed article is one that is blind reviewed and has two external reviewers. The blind review requirement and the use of external reviewers are consistent with the research criteria of objectivity and of knowledge. The referees can a.o.t. help you polish the content of your article by improving the grammar, punctuation, and consistency, and by making content suggestions. The referees of the IJA are independent Norwegian senior researchers loosely associated to the AI-secretariate. Their first language is Norwegian, but they are rather clever in English and other languages.
The electronic issues of the International Journal of Anarchism are updated every time there are significant more informations about the different events and cases. But unless special cases, they are not redistributed by e-mail when they are updated. Also the IAT and other pages at www.anarchy.no are updated almost every day. Thus, to be updated on the news and comments about anarchy, anarchist(s) and anarchism in different connections, it is necessary to visit the AIIS-web sites every day.
The IJA is listed among the other main scientific journals in the world by several universities and other academic sources, i.e. the US Oswego State University of New York's List of Economic Journals on the Web, see [19], by Cpa Directory Index - Law Research, see [20], Resources and Links at http://www.crsp.com, see [21], by Benno Torgler - Researcher in Economics, Tax Compliance and Tax Morale, see [22], Economic journals on the web of http://cba.unomaha.edu/, [23], and Interneteki Ekonomi Dergileri, see [24]. The IJA is thus seen as the most reliable anarchist journal in the world. Other important, but non-academic anarchist journals, that have published AI-IFA-IAF material is Le Monde Libertaire (French) and the multilingual CRIFA bulletin, see Further readings below.
Other important non-academic journals that have published AI-IFA-IAF resolutions are the largest newspapers in Norway, Verdens Gang, see [25], and the two main economic journals in Norway, see [26], and Further readings."
I have also added another article to the Further readings list and added one new source at the External section. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Anna Quist (
talk •
contribs)
09:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
The new AI Wikipedia page is the following: <removed by delldot talk>
I have made som major changes to the AI-Wikipedia page, and I am sure it will meet the WP:RS standards this time. Thus I hope you will not delete it if I publish the new website on Wikipedia. What is your opinion? Please give a quick reply. The new material is:
"The International Journal of Anarchism (IJA), [17]the organ of AI and International Institute for Organization Research [18], the independent research institute of AI, is a Refereed scientific journal, and the only Refereed anarchist scientific journal in world, quoting from IJA's official website:
Articles to IJA may be written in any language, and should be provided with an English summary. If the article is written in English, the summary can be omitted.
International Journal of Anarchism is a Refereed scientific journal. Refereed materials are publications reviewed by "expert readers" or referees prior to the publication of the material. After reading and evaluating the material, the referee informs the publisher/editor if the document should be published or if any changes should be made prior to publication. Refereed materials are also referred to as Peer Reviewed. Refereed materials are significant to the research and the literature of library and information science because they assure readers that the information conveyed is reliable and timely. With some exceptions a refereed article is one that is blind reviewed and has two external reviewers. The blind review requirement and the use of external reviewers are consistent with the research criteria of objectivity and of knowledge. The referees can a.o.t. help you polish the content of your article by improving the grammar, punctuation, and consistency, and by making content suggestions. The referees of the IJA are independent Norwegian senior researchers loosely associated to the AI-secretariate. Their first language is Norwegian, but they are rather clever in English and other languages.
The electronic issues of the International Journal of Anarchism are updated every time there are significant more informations about the different events and cases. But unless special cases, they are not redistributed by e-mail when they are updated. Also the IAT and other pages at www.anarchy.no are updated almost every day. Thus, to be updated on the news and comments about anarchy, anarchist(s) and anarchism in different connections, it is necessary to visit the AIIS-web sites every day.
The IJA is listed among the other main scientific journals in the world by several universities and other academic sources, i.e. the US Oswego State University of New York's List of Economic Journals on the Web, see [19], by Cpa Directory Index - Law Research, see [20], Resources and Links at http://www.crsp.com, see [21], by Benno Torgler - Researcher in Economics, Tax Compliance and Tax Morale, see [22], Economic journals on the web of http://cba.unomaha.edu/, [23], and Interneteki Ekonomi Dergileri, see [24]. The IJA is thus seen as the most reliable anarchist journal in the world. Other important, but non-academic anarchist journals, that have published AI-IFA-IAF material is Le Monde Libertaire (French) and the multilingual CRIFA bulletin, see Further readings below.
Other important non-academic journals that have published AI-IFA-IAF resolutions are the largest newspapers in Norway, Verdens Gang, see [25], and the two main economic journals in Norway, see [26], and Further readings."
I have also added another article to the Further readings list and added one new source at the External section.
I hope Wiki-consensus about publishing of the page can be reached before I publish it. What is your opinion? Is the page good enough for publishing?
The proposal to the new AI- Wikipedia page is in my sandbox, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Quist ( talk • contribs) 14:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I will not publish a new proposal to the AI-Wikipedia page until Wiki-consensus is reached.
As far as I can understand the articles in Verdens Gang, Dagens Næringsliv og Finansavisen, plus Le Monde Libertaire and CRIFA-Bulletin have inline citations of the type you mention. They agree with AI because no opposition is following these articles. And there is no opposition to the IJA-stuff in the other scientific journal either.
You wrote "The journals you list look like good sources. Do any of them have articles that cover AI? If you can provide inline citations for facts in the article with these sources, that would be very solid." These articles cover AI.You also wrote "Much improved Anna, I see the inline citations and that you've taken care of some of my concerns about the NPOV." The IJA-stuff is not questioned by any other reliable academic journal, it is not controversial and not outdated.
I have read WP:RS. It states a.o.t.:" 1. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are highly valued and usually the most reliable sources in areas where they are available, such as history, medicine and science, although some material may be outdated by more recent research, or controversial in the sense that there are alternative theories. 2. Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used in these areas, particularly if they are respected mainstream publications."
Ad 1. International Journal of Anarchism is the only scientific, academic and peer-reviewed anarchist journal in the world. Thus stuff from the IJA is meeting this criterion and standard fully. The IJA-stuff is not questioned by any other reliable academic journal, it is not controversial and not outdated. In fact several academic/university websites link up IJA, together with all the other main academic/scientific economic journals. Thus the criterion for independent third party sources is fulfilled. The following universities/academic pages list IJA:
US Oswego State University of New York's List of Economic Journals on the Web
International Journal of Anarchism ...
http://www.oswego.edu/~economic/journals.htm
CPA DIRECTORY INDEX LawResearch ... International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of the Economics of Business · International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems ...
http://www.lawresearchservices.com/firms/admin/cpa-econ-journals.htm
Resources and Links International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research · International Journal of Applied Econometrics and ...
http://www.crsp.com/resources/links.html
Benno Torgler - Researcher in Economics, Tax Compliance and Tax Morale International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Economics · International Journal of Business and Economics ...
http://www.torgler.com/benno/linksjournals.htm
Interneteki Ekonomi Dergileri ... International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Business and Economics · International Journal of the Economics of Business ...
http://www.seyfettinartan.gen.tr/journal.htm
Economic journals on the web ... International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies · International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Economics ...
http://cba.unomaha.edu/faculty/cdecker/WEB/Economic%20journals%20on%20the%20web.htm
ad 2. "Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used in these areas, particularly if they are respected mainstream publications." We have listed/quoted several newspaper/journal articles, a.o.t from Norway's largest newspaper and the two largest economic newspapers. Thus, this criterion is aslo fulfilled. We have also quoted articles in the most reliable and largest anarchist journals outside IJA, the French Le Monde Libertaire, and the multilingiual CRIFA bulletin. Also they are relevant non-academic sources.
Thus, both 1. and 2. are fulfilled: I cannot see why the AI-Wikipedia page should not pass the WP:RS test.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 16:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC))
<removed Maxim's talk page>
I guess Dagens Næringsliv, Finansavisen, Verdens Gang and Le Monde Libertaire and the CRIFA-Bulletin must be considered as independent third party sources.
Many thanks for all the help you have given Delldot.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 21:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC))
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
You suggested that I mention when I set up for my own review so I have done so now, also I have a few people who I am waiting on replies from using the template that I mentioned on the WP:ER page. Even after I have got my review I will still be happy to help other Editors out (especially if I can get better at it) because I have enjoyed the 3 I have done so far. %% -SYKKO-%% ( talk to me) 04:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey there! Subarachnoid hemorrhage is on the edge of FA status, and I was wondering if you could provide a source (sources?) for Image:SAH incidence graph.svg (both inline and in the image description page, please :) Thanks, and looking forward to your next GA/FA, Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 19:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
-- Mifter ( talk) 03:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
I've done a bit more. I'm afraid real-life is interfering with my WP time and I'm also trying to respond to a GA review of ketogenic diet. So, I'm going to be real slow. I see you've got another review and there are plenty other folk if you need feedback quickly. If you have concerns about your sources being up to FA level, try User:Eubulides. Cheers, Colin° Talk 13:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, delldot, I haven't found time to continue reviewing it. I won't have time in the next couple of days and then I'm on holiday for a week. Have you tried printing the article, and reading it out loud? You could ask User:GrahamColm for an opinion. Good luck! Colin° Talk 14:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
At Magnetic resonance neurography? I was cleaning up the references and it turns out that clearly the contributor ( Afiller ( talk · contribs)) is one of the inventor of the technology. While I don't think there is much COI going on, I figure it'd be best if someone with a more medical background had a look. Circeus ( talk) 17:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
SAH is FA. I'd stuff your userpage with barnstars, but I think even that would be an inadequate sign of appreciation. Keep up the brilliant work. JFW | T@lk 19:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
-- Bedford Pray 09:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
I award you this barnstar for helping me to learn the process of reviewing other editors, and for giving me great advice on my Editor Review I have learned alot from you through both processes and just wanted you to know that I appreciate it%% -SYKKO-%% ( talk to me) 15:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC) |
I am just waiting on trying to get a map but have the content just about right. A quick look-over to alert me to any grammar or flow glitches would be much appreciated... :) Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 22:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
pick 1 from the following: 1/you have been exceedingly busy, mostly with subarachnoid haemorrhage. 2/ you have just been letting me figure out for myself that the idea i proposed 10 days ago was too clever by half (with clever, in this case, not being a +). 3/ i have somehow given offence. that said, i have an odd situation here. i have a reference with an only copyright date of 1928. (don't worry, it's not on medicine.)i know for sure that my copy dates much later than that. on the copyright page it has the usual 'all rights reserved, no reproduction ,blah, blah, blah. my understanding of copyright law is that the copyright on this should have expired in 1998. i would like to be able to make pretty much free use of this in an article, including some pix.it's one of the major references in its field. any thoughts? advice? pax vobiscum. Toyokuni3 ( talk) 14:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
So I spent some time playing around with the image map extension. I have already put it to use. with the help of Wikipe-tan and the Trifecta I have created a great little adaptation to the image on the WP:TRI page.
Thanks again for all your help! %% -SYKKO-%% ( talk to me) 21:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, the article has been reposted and is virtually identical to the original one that was deleted. I've nominated it for speedy deletion. If it gets re-created a third time I would suggest blocking it from recreation. Zazaban ( talk) 20:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
She's now trying to argue that the deletion of the Anarchist International article is an act of vandalism and I am being called a vandal. Also, she's claiming that the anon who blanked my userpage and tried to sabotage the vote is not a vandal. Zazaban ( talk) 20:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
The pulmonary contusion stuff from Grainger and Allison is from Ch 20... I don't know how to indicate this with the template. I use an online edition so I have no page numbers. Antelan 02:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
"sometimes I eat peanut butter and jelly with no bread"
Yeah! I saw that! :O
— CycloneNimrod Talk? 16:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Good luck! Although I'm not sure who your "chest trauma experts" are. I'm a pulmonologist, not a trauma surgeon. ;-) Axl ( talk) 18:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
At my "user talk" I have quoted several newspaper-articles (~from paper editions, etc) and a book as independent sources to the Anarchist International page. Take a look at it and see if it is enough independent sources to put up the Anarchist International page again. In case you have other comments I would be glad to hear it. I can of course change the content a bit if you mean it is still not compatible with the Wikipedia standard, just give me a hint.( Anna Quist ( talk) 21:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC))
I have recreated the Anarchist International Wikipedia page in a Anna Quist sandbox page for discussion and perhaps changes, to reach a consensus, for later to publish it (based on general consent). Feel free to make comments. The sooner we can reach consensus and publishing, the better. ( Anna Quist ( talk) 22:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC))
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International
( Anna Quist ( talk) 22:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)).
Hi,
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.
Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader,
geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at
geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!
The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.
Thank You, BCeagle0312 ( talk) 03:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
What a pleasure it was to see your image added to traumatic diaphragmatic hernia, only moments after I created the article. Keep up the good work. -- Arcadian ( talk) 19:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
To delldot. You wrote:"If you want, I can mark the sentences in your sandbox that I think need citations." I think this is a good idea. Hope you have time soon to do it, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International for placing comments. I have also updated relevant information on my talk page( Anna Quist ( talk) 13:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC))
Hi again Dell, I hope you are well. I know images aren't your area but I thought I would ask anyways. :) On the article Quackwatch there is the logo there for the official website. How would I go about finding out if it should be in the article and not copyright protected? I would appreciate your help if you know. If you do not know, not a problem either. I am just curious how to do this for use overall in Wikipedia. Thanks and no rush, I won't be online here for much longer. -- CrohnieGal Talk 16:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
{{logo fur | Article = | Use = <!--Choose: Infobox / Org / Brand / Product --> | Used for = | Owner = | Website = | History = | Commentary = | Description = | Source = | Portion = | Low_resolution = | Purpose = <!--Must be specified if Use is not Infobox / Org / Brand / Product--> | Replaceability = | other_information = }}
Thanks, I appreciate the help again. I was going to delete it but I think fixing it to comply is even better.
How would I check if pictures in articles are Fair use and not Copyright protection though? Is there a system to check this or would I have to go to the download site and then see where it came from and go there to see if it is protected? It's too early for me to do this now, need a couple cups of coffee at least, but I will try what you told me and get back to you so you can check what I did to make sure I did it correctly. Thanks my friend, I always appreciate your help, -- CrohnieGal Talk 10:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the comments Delldot. I will change my proposal to a new Anarchist International Wikipedia page according to your advice. I will also work with the anarchist historian H. Fagerhus and the International Institute for Organization Research to get sources to the relevant documents regarding the decisions of IFA-IAF-AI congresses and other meetings and from the International Anarchist Tribunal. We also have the e-mail source where the southern IFA-federation's secretary states the AI is lunatic. That speaks for itself. When I have made a new proposal I hope you have time to take a look at it, i.e. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International , again, for new comments. ( Anna Quist ( talk) 18:06, 20 July 2008 (UTC)).
OK - we will drop the quote from the e-mail stating the AI is lunatic. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Anna Quist (
talk •
contribs)
18:21, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi there,
When I read your discussion, I can understand the problem. Now I am editing this topic (INTI College Sabah - Programmes) all over again. Also now I am trying editing to explain what this courses are all about by using my own words and not from the advertisement and brochures. So please check and see whether my work is alright or not so that I will be on a right track.
Also, there is one question I would like to ask, is it ok to plot down the list of subjects for each course (except English Improvement Programme) so that the people who surf the Wikipedia website will know what this courses are all about?
Many Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pisceslalena ( talk • contribs) 05:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on bringing it to FA. [And thanks for the barnstar. Much appreciated.] Axl ( talk) 06:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Delldot, I think my last response to your GA review comments on Mental status examination might have been ungracious. Your comments and advice have in fact been very helpful and I think the article is vastly better as a consequence. I have also learnt a lot from the process. I was just getting a bit tired of the whole thing, and had other stuff to do, but I have since gone back and done a bit more (including adding some cool images) ... and I've had another look at WP:GACR and I do think it is good enough for GA ... would you mind having another look? Anonymaus ( talk) 11:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Not much up with me at all, my friend. On-wiki, I've been spending most of my time trying to diversify my skills. Off-wiki, my life kind of revolves around my upcoming wedding in a couple of months. So I guess things are peachy.
So, 'sup wit u? I see you're still kicking butt left and right on this delldot-pedia. Hope everything A-OK off-wiki.
Thanks for hitting me up the way you did. I think it's sweet that you remembered.
Peace! SWik78 ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello Delldot! Together with H. Fagerhus, the well known Norwegian anarchist historian, I have made a new proposal to the The Anarchist International Wikipedia page, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International
I hope this is according to the guidelines of Wikipedia, and that it should be published. However if you have any new proposals for improvement, it is very welcome. All things can be imropeved.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 14:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC))
Hello Delldot. I will add a chapter about Further readings with weight on third party sources. I am a bit confused about how I shall do it. Can you give me some advice and perhaps give a link with an example on how this is done? ( Anna Quist ( talk) 17:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)).
Thank you for the advice about creating a chapter on Further readings. However I would like to see a good Wikipedia page that has such a section, so I can make a similar chapter. Can you provide me with a couple of relevant links to Wikipedia articles?
Material about Anarchist International (IFA -IAF- AI) organizations and their resolutions, are published in several articles of the CRIFA bulletin in English, French and Spanish, in the French (FAF) anarchist paper Le Monde Libertaire, and in The Italian anarchist paper Humanita Nova. How shall I quote these? They are not available online, it is paper editions. Shall I translate to English, or is it ok to quote the article names in French, Spanish and Italian? ( Anna Quist ( talk) 18:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC))
I have looked at the two pages you mentioned, and will create a Further readings section.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 21:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)).
Hello Delldeot
The section with Further readings is finnished. What is your opinion? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International ( Anna Quist ( talk) 23:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)).
Hello Delldot. As mentioned I have made a Further readings section with reliable third party sources and also added several external links, mostly with independent third party sources, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International. I think the page is ready for publication. I would like to hear your opinion.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 08:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)).
Hello Delldot. Speedy deletion oh The Anarchist International Wikipedia page?
I posted the new The Anarchist International Wikipedia page, but it was tagged with speedy deletion. I protested the deletion at the talkpage. What do you mean I shall do now? I need help or else it will probably be deleted( Anna Quist ( talk) 12:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)).
Hello Delldot. The new AI page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anarchist_International is deleted. I have however asked adminstrator Alex.muller to send me a copy of it. Perhaps I can publish it on another site. Is there any possiblity to recover it on the Wikipedia? Please give me some advice. I and Fagerhus have put some effort in making a good page, so we are a bit disappointed. We are also interested to know who, and on what ground, the deleting is done.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 13:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC))
Hello Delldot. The new AI page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anarchist_International is deleted. I have however asked adminstrator Alex.muller to send me a copy of it. Perhaps I can publish it on another site. Is there any possiblity to recover it on the Wikipedia? Please give me some advice. I and Fagerhus have put some effort in making a good page, so we are a bit disappointed. We are also interested to know who, and on what ground, the deleting is done.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 13:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC))
My ears are burning. Hi both of you, if I may jump in. My view is that any recreation of the article is almost doomed. As a non-admin I could not see the previous version to compare, I have to leave that to the reviewing admin. The fact that the original article page is salted shows that you are up againts a lot of -ve opinion. To get any chance of acceptance I think you would have to get all these people involved again and show that you are making a proper effort to keep within the guidelines, but how to do that ? Deletion review ? arbitration, request for comment, Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron ? I am almost tempted to say create the article and AfD it immediatly to get a discussion going before CsD - but that may not stop a speedy del any how. -- triwbe ( talk) 16:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi dell. Any chance of a bit of peer reviewing on this one? Casliber made a start but has become a bit overwhelmed by other things I think. Fainites barley 15:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I think the ce by Awadewit is pretty well done now, barring any last minute queries, so if you wish to have another look, that would be good. jimfbleak ( talk) 17:59, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
To Delldot et.al. The www.anarchy.no is the most scientific and reliable anarchist website on Internet. Thus when you say "Again, I don't consider anarchy.no to be a reliable source" I cannot agree with you. You have to explain why you distrust www.anarchy.no. What facts do you have that prove this point of view? The so called "anorg-warning" made by the marxists Jamal Hannah and Peter Bach? This is almost entirely false. We have rejected and turned this down about 100% at http://www.anarchy.no/anorgwarning.html . Try to be more matter of fact. Now please explain to me why you distrust www.anarchy.no. with sound, scientific, matter of fact arguments.
I don't know what the AfD is, but the AI-page is finished from Fagerhus and me, and we are interested in going all the way on Wikipedia, before we try to post it on another site. So try to undelete it and we will see what happens. Ask the relevant persons to undelete it.
What is the GFDL? As far as I know Fagerhus and I have the copyright to the page, we made it. Thanks for all the help, that will be credited, but we are the authors. The helpers on Wikipedia have also contributed with a small bit of input to new updates of the www.anarchy.no. That is fine. Our AI-Wikiedia page is the truth about the AI. If Wikipedia is not interested in the truth, we certainly will find others that are. By the way, consensus means a page should be deleted only if all agree. If a few can decide deletion, it is minority dictatorship. ( Anna Quist ( talk) 18:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC))
I have read WP:RS. It states a.o.t.:" 1. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are highly valued and usually the most reliable sources in areas where they are available, such as history, medicine and science, although some material may be outdated by more recent research, or controversial in the sense that there are alternative theories. 2. Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used in these areas, particularly if they are respected mainstream publications."
Ad 1. International Journal of Anarchism is the only scientific, academic and peer-reviewed anarchist journal in the world. Thus stuff from the IJA is meeting this criterion and standard fully. The IJA-stuff is not questioned by any other reliable academic journal, it is not controversial and not outdated. In fact several academic/university websites link up IJA, together with all the other main academic/scientific economic journals. Thus the criterion for independent third party sources is fulfilled. The following universities/academic pages list IJA:
US Oswego State University of New York's List of Economic Journals on the Web
International Journal of Anarchism ...
http://www.oswego.edu/~economic/journals.htm
CPA DIRECTORY INDEX LawResearch ... International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of the Economics of Business · International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems ...
http://www.lawresearchservices.com/firms/admin/cpa-econ-journals.htm
Resources and Links International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research · International Journal of Applied Econometrics and ...
http://www.crsp.com/resources/links.html
Benno Torgler - Researcher in Economics, Tax Compliance and Tax Morale International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Economics · International Journal of Business and Economics ...
http://www.torgler.com/benno/linksjournals.htm
Interneteki Ekonomi Dergileri ... International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Business and Economics · International Journal of the Economics of Business ...
http://www.seyfettinartan.gen.tr/journal.htm
Economic journals on the web ... International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies · International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Economics ...
http://cba.unomaha.edu/faculty/cdecker/WEB/Economic%20journals%20on%20the%20web.htm
ad 2. "Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used in these areas, particularly if they are respected mainstream publications." We have listed/quoted several newspaper/journal articles, a.o.t from Norway's largest newspaper and the two largest economic newspapers. Thus, this criterion is aslo fulfilled. We have also quoted articles in the most reliable and largest anarchist journals outside IJA, the French Le Monde Libertaire, and the multilingiual CRIFA bulletin. Also they are relevant non-academic sources.
Thus, both 1. and 2. are fulfilled: I cannot see why the AI-Wikipedia page should not pass the WP:RS test.
Just undelete the AI-Wikipedia and let it go through the WP:RS test: I am sure it will pass. I will of course also come up with more material and answer to questions if somebody have questions. We have more material/articles, than mentioned on the AI-Wikipedia page.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 17:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC))
It is all articles with resolutions from AI-organizations, thus they cover AI and its main policy. Could you please discuss this and put forward may case about undelete before the deleter, i.e. put in a good word for me? The deleter said there was not much change from the old page, but that is not true. I put up all the relevant sources, that was lacking in the first page. The oldest that was deleted, from 14. juli 2008 22:43, is thus quite differenr from the current version. You are the one of the admins that now this case best, and you know the routines here well....
( Anna Quist ( talk) 21:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC))
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 23:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I have made som major changes to the AI-Wikipedia page, and I am sure it will meet the WP:RS standards this time. The new material is:
"The International Journal of Anarchism (IJA), [17]the organ of AI and International Institute for Organization Research [18], the independent research institute of AI, is a Refereed scientific journal, and the only Refereed anarchist scientific journal in world, quoting from IJA's official website:
Articles to IJA may be written in any language, and should be provided with an English summary. If the article is written in English, the summary can be omitted.
International Journal of Anarchism is a Refereed scientific journal. Refereed materials are publications reviewed by "expert readers" or referees prior to the publication of the material. After reading and evaluating the material, the referee informs the publisher/editor if the document should be published or if any changes should be made prior to publication. Refereed materials are also referred to as Peer Reviewed. Refereed materials are significant to the research and the literature of library and information science because they assure readers that the information conveyed is reliable and timely. With some exceptions a refereed article is one that is blind reviewed and has two external reviewers. The blind review requirement and the use of external reviewers are consistent with the research criteria of objectivity and of knowledge. The referees can a.o.t. help you polish the content of your article by improving the grammar, punctuation, and consistency, and by making content suggestions. The referees of the IJA are independent Norwegian senior researchers loosely associated to the AI-secretariate. Their first language is Norwegian, but they are rather clever in English and other languages.
The electronic issues of the International Journal of Anarchism are updated every time there are significant more informations about the different events and cases. But unless special cases, they are not redistributed by e-mail when they are updated. Also the IAT and other pages at www.anarchy.no are updated almost every day. Thus, to be updated on the news and comments about anarchy, anarchist(s) and anarchism in different connections, it is necessary to visit the AIIS-web sites every day.
The IJA is listed among the other main scientific journals in the world by several universities and other academic sources, i.e. the US Oswego State University of New York's List of Economic Journals on the Web, see [19], by Cpa Directory Index - Law Research, see [20], Resources and Links at http://www.crsp.com, see [21], by Benno Torgler - Researcher in Economics, Tax Compliance and Tax Morale, see [22], Economic journals on the web of http://cba.unomaha.edu/, [23], and Interneteki Ekonomi Dergileri, see [24]. The IJA is thus seen as the most reliable anarchist journal in the world. Other important, but non-academic anarchist journals, that have published AI-IFA-IAF material is Le Monde Libertaire (French) and the multilingual CRIFA bulletin, see Further readings below.
Other important non-academic journals that have published AI-IFA-IAF resolutions are the largest newspapers in Norway, Verdens Gang, see [25], and the two main economic journals in Norway, see [26], and Further readings."
I have also added another article to the Further readings list and added one new source at the External section. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Anna Quist (
talk •
contribs)
09:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
The new AI Wikipedia page is the following: <removed by delldot talk>
I have made som major changes to the AI-Wikipedia page, and I am sure it will meet the WP:RS standards this time. Thus I hope you will not delete it if I publish the new website on Wikipedia. What is your opinion? Please give a quick reply. The new material is:
"The International Journal of Anarchism (IJA), [17]the organ of AI and International Institute for Organization Research [18], the independent research institute of AI, is a Refereed scientific journal, and the only Refereed anarchist scientific journal in world, quoting from IJA's official website:
Articles to IJA may be written in any language, and should be provided with an English summary. If the article is written in English, the summary can be omitted.
International Journal of Anarchism is a Refereed scientific journal. Refereed materials are publications reviewed by "expert readers" or referees prior to the publication of the material. After reading and evaluating the material, the referee informs the publisher/editor if the document should be published or if any changes should be made prior to publication. Refereed materials are also referred to as Peer Reviewed. Refereed materials are significant to the research and the literature of library and information science because they assure readers that the information conveyed is reliable and timely. With some exceptions a refereed article is one that is blind reviewed and has two external reviewers. The blind review requirement and the use of external reviewers are consistent with the research criteria of objectivity and of knowledge. The referees can a.o.t. help you polish the content of your article by improving the grammar, punctuation, and consistency, and by making content suggestions. The referees of the IJA are independent Norwegian senior researchers loosely associated to the AI-secretariate. Their first language is Norwegian, but they are rather clever in English and other languages.
The electronic issues of the International Journal of Anarchism are updated every time there are significant more informations about the different events and cases. But unless special cases, they are not redistributed by e-mail when they are updated. Also the IAT and other pages at www.anarchy.no are updated almost every day. Thus, to be updated on the news and comments about anarchy, anarchist(s) and anarchism in different connections, it is necessary to visit the AIIS-web sites every day.
The IJA is listed among the other main scientific journals in the world by several universities and other academic sources, i.e. the US Oswego State University of New York's List of Economic Journals on the Web, see [19], by Cpa Directory Index - Law Research, see [20], Resources and Links at http://www.crsp.com, see [21], by Benno Torgler - Researcher in Economics, Tax Compliance and Tax Morale, see [22], Economic journals on the web of http://cba.unomaha.edu/, [23], and Interneteki Ekonomi Dergileri, see [24]. The IJA is thus seen as the most reliable anarchist journal in the world. Other important, but non-academic anarchist journals, that have published AI-IFA-IAF material is Le Monde Libertaire (French) and the multilingual CRIFA bulletin, see Further readings below.
Other important non-academic journals that have published AI-IFA-IAF resolutions are the largest newspapers in Norway, Verdens Gang, see [25], and the two main economic journals in Norway, see [26], and Further readings."
I have also added another article to the Further readings list and added one new source at the External section.
I hope Wiki-consensus about publishing of the page can be reached before I publish it. What is your opinion? Is the page good enough for publishing?
The proposal to the new AI- Wikipedia page is in my sandbox, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Quist ( talk • contribs) 14:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I will not publish a new proposal to the AI-Wikipedia page until Wiki-consensus is reached.
As far as I can understand the articles in Verdens Gang, Dagens Næringsliv og Finansavisen, plus Le Monde Libertaire and CRIFA-Bulletin have inline citations of the type you mention. They agree with AI because no opposition is following these articles. And there is no opposition to the IJA-stuff in the other scientific journal either.
You wrote "The journals you list look like good sources. Do any of them have articles that cover AI? If you can provide inline citations for facts in the article with these sources, that would be very solid." These articles cover AI.You also wrote "Much improved Anna, I see the inline citations and that you've taken care of some of my concerns about the NPOV." The IJA-stuff is not questioned by any other reliable academic journal, it is not controversial and not outdated.
I have read WP:RS. It states a.o.t.:" 1. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are highly valued and usually the most reliable sources in areas where they are available, such as history, medicine and science, although some material may be outdated by more recent research, or controversial in the sense that there are alternative theories. 2. Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used in these areas, particularly if they are respected mainstream publications."
Ad 1. International Journal of Anarchism is the only scientific, academic and peer-reviewed anarchist journal in the world. Thus stuff from the IJA is meeting this criterion and standard fully. The IJA-stuff is not questioned by any other reliable academic journal, it is not controversial and not outdated. In fact several academic/university websites link up IJA, together with all the other main academic/scientific economic journals. Thus the criterion for independent third party sources is fulfilled. The following universities/academic pages list IJA:
US Oswego State University of New York's List of Economic Journals on the Web
International Journal of Anarchism ...
http://www.oswego.edu/~economic/journals.htm
CPA DIRECTORY INDEX LawResearch ... International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of the Economics of Business · International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems ...
http://www.lawresearchservices.com/firms/admin/cpa-econ-journals.htm
Resources and Links International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research · International Journal of Applied Econometrics and ...
http://www.crsp.com/resources/links.html
Benno Torgler - Researcher in Economics, Tax Compliance and Tax Morale International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Economics · International Journal of Business and Economics ...
http://www.torgler.com/benno/linksjournals.htm
Interneteki Ekonomi Dergileri ... International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Business and Economics · International Journal of the Economics of Business ...
http://www.seyfettinartan.gen.tr/journal.htm
Economic journals on the web ... International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies · International Journal of Anarchism · International Journal of Applied Economics ...
http://cba.unomaha.edu/faculty/cdecker/WEB/Economic%20journals%20on%20the%20web.htm
ad 2. "Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used in these areas, particularly if they are respected mainstream publications." We have listed/quoted several newspaper/journal articles, a.o.t from Norway's largest newspaper and the two largest economic newspapers. Thus, this criterion is aslo fulfilled. We have also quoted articles in the most reliable and largest anarchist journals outside IJA, the French Le Monde Libertaire, and the multilingiual CRIFA bulletin. Also they are relevant non-academic sources.
Thus, both 1. and 2. are fulfilled: I cannot see why the AI-Wikipedia page should not pass the WP:RS test.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 16:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC))
<removed Maxim's talk page>
I guess Dagens Næringsliv, Finansavisen, Verdens Gang and Le Monde Libertaire and the CRIFA-Bulletin must be considered as independent third party sources.
Many thanks for all the help you have given Delldot.
( Anna Quist ( talk) 21:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC))
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |