Thank you for remvoving it, I was about to tell you it was not the right venue to fight that fight. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
We're very sorry for editing those abilities like that. We thought we put in the right powers this time, but it turns out that we were really wrong. Please forgive us and we'll never ever do it again in the future. 2600:1700:B030:EC0:49A3:C7B8:C051:B884 ( talk) 23:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Interesting. Might be worth mentioning in the article. Reminds me of a similar criticism of Legend of Galactic Heroes (although I diagree with that). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Speaking as someone who almost exclusively edits political and civics-related articles, I know how tough it can be to separate your own personal beliefs from the topics you're editing. As seen on the campaign talk page, it looks like you might be struggling with that delicate balance as well. When I run into these situations myself, I find it helpful to:
Anyway, just thought I'd offer a few tips that you might find helpful.
All the best! Woko Sapien ( talk) 21:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Using comic books to overrule secondary sources. Thank you. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 22:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the ArabâIsraeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the ArabâIsraeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. â Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. â Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States support for Israel in the IsraelâHamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ ⢠Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Please see this diff. Seems like stalking by the same editor to remove this image. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 21:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
It's worthy of investigation, but I'm not sure there is enough evidence to justify a checkuser and I'm unconvinced they are the same person. It may be tag teaming and it seems not much can be done about that. Sean.hoyland ( talk) 09:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the ArabâIsraeli conflict. This is a is a designated contentious topic.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
*
Protests of 1968 was otherwise removed by @
Kire1975
[5] on May 19.
Personally I think MOS:NOTSEEAGAIN is a valid reason, as both the links you are restoring are featured in the overview section. Either way, please take it to the talk page before restoring such information, as you are restoring links that three other users have removed. CommunityNotesContributor ( talk) 12:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for remvoving it, I was about to tell you it was not the right venue to fight that fight. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
We're very sorry for editing those abilities like that. We thought we put in the right powers this time, but it turns out that we were really wrong. Please forgive us and we'll never ever do it again in the future. 2600:1700:B030:EC0:49A3:C7B8:C051:B884 ( talk) 23:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Interesting. Might be worth mentioning in the article. Reminds me of a similar criticism of Legend of Galactic Heroes (although I diagree with that). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Speaking as someone who almost exclusively edits political and civics-related articles, I know how tough it can be to separate your own personal beliefs from the topics you're editing. As seen on the campaign talk page, it looks like you might be struggling with that delicate balance as well. When I run into these situations myself, I find it helpful to:
Anyway, just thought I'd offer a few tips that you might find helpful.
All the best! Woko Sapien ( talk) 21:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Using comic books to overrule secondary sources. Thank you. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 22:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the ArabâIsraeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the ArabâIsraeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. â Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. â Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States support for Israel in the IsraelâHamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ ⢠Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Please see this diff. Seems like stalking by the same editor to remove this image. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 21:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
It's worthy of investigation, but I'm not sure there is enough evidence to justify a checkuser and I'm unconvinced they are the same person. It may be tag teaming and it seems not much can be done about that. Sean.hoyland ( talk) 09:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the ArabâIsraeli conflict. This is a is a designated contentious topic.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
*
Protests of 1968 was otherwise removed by @
Kire1975
[5] on May 19.
Personally I think MOS:NOTSEEAGAIN is a valid reason, as both the links you are restoring are featured in the overview section. Either way, please take it to the talk page before restoring such information, as you are restoring links that three other users have removed. CommunityNotesContributor ( talk) 12:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)