![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi there,
I've reviewed your nomination, and have a question. Could you please respond at Template:Did you know nominations/Reginald Uren? ColonialGrid ( talk) 17:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 9 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reginald Uren, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that to further his career, New Zealand architect Reginald Uren worked his passage to England as a greaser on a steamer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reginald Uren. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
The article
Morden tube station you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Morden tube station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ritchie333 --
Ritchie333 (
talk) 18:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
The article
Morden tube station you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Morden tube station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont) 10:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Good to see another tube station reach GA status. I seem to recall discussing some of the Zone 1 London tube articles could do with work, so if you've got any good sources to help improve this, I'd be happy to help out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 28 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Morden tube station, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Morden station is at one end of a 27.8-kilometre (17.3 mi) long tunnel, the longest on the London Underground? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Morden tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Thanks from the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 00:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The article
Down Street tube station you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Down Street tube station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ritchie333 --
Ritchie333 (
talk) 19:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
I will revive it in the new year, that I promise. Simply south .... .. sitting on fans for just 8 years 01:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 27 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Down Street tube station, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that early in World War II, Winston Churchill took refuge in the Barn? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Down Street tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 00:03, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | |
Thanks for all your DYK contributions from Richard Garth to Down Street tube station. Freikorp ( talk) 12:18, 31 January 2015 (UTC) |
Template:Citation London Underground performance exits 2003 to 2011 has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Ricky81682 (
talk) 10:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Young (longevity claims researcher) (2nd nomination) EEng ( talk) 01:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Young (longevity claims researcher) (2nd nomination) EEng ( talk) 01:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
David, I cannot thank you too much for the changes you have made to the lists of listed buildings using AWB. I am not particularly good with technology and have never tried to "learn" AWB; I thought that I was going to have to change all the EH references to HE manually! Thanks for saving me many hours of boredom. Best wishes, -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 08:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
{{sfnp|English Heritage|...}}
. There were some other links to English Heritage using {{sfn|English Heritage|...}}
which I haven't changed yet, but they are links to things other than the National Heritage List for England, so they were not broken by the template change (e.g. the first reference in
Listed buildings in Saint Anne's on the Sea). I will change ones that that to the format of the first reference of
Listed buildings in Great Harwood.--
DavidCane (
talk) 09:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC).
A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. Was there anything I left out of the summary that you'd like to see put back in? I'd appreciate it if you could you check the article one more time before its day on the Main Page. - Dank ( push to talk) 21:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Good to see it, precious again, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
David, I've reverted a couple of changes you've recently made with AWB, as it changes the citation style in the article. When an article is using the cite web template with mode=cs2, the change you're making alters the appearance of the resulting citation, and, if the article is already consistently formatted, it also makes the citation different in style from all the others in the article. The whole "mode" thing is relatively new, as far as I can tell, as the old parameter model was a bit different (NB: I'm no wikignome though!) so you might not have come across it before. Cheers! Hchc2009 ( talk) 07:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't know whether you received the ping, but I'm letting you know that User:Vincent60030 asked for your assistance at Talk:Acton Town tube station/GA1, regarding article and citation improvement. Regards, Rcsprinter123 (converse) @ 19:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
We are preparing to take a closer look at Featured articles promoted in 2004–2010 that may need a review. We started with a script-compiled list of older FAs that have not had a recent formal review. The next step is to prune the list by removing articles that are still actively maintained, up-to-date, and believed to meet current standards. We know that many of you personally maintain articles that you nominated, so we'd appreciate your help in winnowing the list where appropriate.
Please take a look at the sandbox list, check over the FAs listed by your name, and indicate on the sandbox talk page your assessment of their current status. Likewise, if you have taken on the maintenance of any listed FAs that were originally nominated by a departed editor, please indicate their status. BLPs should be given especially careful consideration.
Thanks for your help! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Please respond at Wikipedia talk:Unreviewed featured articles/sandbox#Pinging next round; thanks! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. The TFA page currently contains the article lead, but that's about 520 characters too long for TFA; could you edit out the parts you can do without? - Dank ( push to talk) 02:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, David. I'm just posting to let you know that List of works by Charles Holden – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 22. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 22:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
David,
Sorry to be a pain, but you couldn't double-check the edits you're making with the use of AWB on Historic England before saving, could you? There've been several recent edits that have changed the citation style accidentally, and another in which you've auto-changed the owner from English Heritage to Historic England...! :) Hchc2009 ( talk) 13:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi David,
I just wonder if you can help me find the reference for the recent content addition by some other user for the station building part since I am not able to find any reliable source. Thanks! Hope to get Oxford Circus to get good article status! Vincent60030 ( talk) 15:41, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
-- DavidCane ( talk) 18:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Greetings!
I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Hampshire! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 2,690 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in Hampshire.
Hope to see you join! Harej ( talk) 20:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Euston tube station you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ritchie333 --
Ritchie333 (
talk) 12:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
The article
Euston tube station you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Euston tube station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ritchie333 --
Ritchie333 (
talk) 16:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
The article
Euston tube station you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Euston tube station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ritchie333 --
Ritchie333 (
talk) 10:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
I am not sure how you think this edit fixed anything. If it did not, how many other edits that you made at that time may have broken links? -- PBS ( talk) 16:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
You left a comment on Automation of the London Underground saying that the article felt too much like an opinion piece - what in particular made you think this/do you have any suggestions for improvement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Absolutelypuremilk ( talk • contribs) 13:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
If you wish to make use of/develop London Wiki [2] feel free (original research welcome). Jackiespeel ( talk) 09:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I'm pleased to tell you that I've begun reviewing the article
Highgate tube station you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk) 11:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The article
Highgate tube station you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Highgate tube station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk) 23:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
I just wanted to let you know that I have nominated Highgate for DYK! :) Also, can you please reply my earlier message about Oxford Circus tube station? Thanks. Best regards, Vincent60030 ( talk) 06:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Highbury tube station layout.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:46, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Highgate tube station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Highgate tube station had platforms built to accommodate nine-car trains on the Northern line that never used them? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Highgate tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 13:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi there,
I've reviewed your nomination, and have a question. Could you please respond at Template:Did you know nominations/Reginald Uren? ColonialGrid ( talk) 17:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 9 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reginald Uren, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that to further his career, New Zealand architect Reginald Uren worked his passage to England as a greaser on a steamer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reginald Uren. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
The article
Morden tube station you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Morden tube station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ritchie333 --
Ritchie333 (
talk) 18:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
The article
Morden tube station you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Morden tube station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont) 10:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Good to see another tube station reach GA status. I seem to recall discussing some of the Zone 1 London tube articles could do with work, so if you've got any good sources to help improve this, I'd be happy to help out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 28 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Morden tube station, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Morden station is at one end of a 27.8-kilometre (17.3 mi) long tunnel, the longest on the London Underground? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Morden tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Thanks from the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 00:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The article
Down Street tube station you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Down Street tube station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ritchie333 --
Ritchie333 (
talk) 19:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
I will revive it in the new year, that I promise. Simply south .... .. sitting on fans for just 8 years 01:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 27 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Down Street tube station, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that early in World War II, Winston Churchill took refuge in the Barn? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Down Street tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 00:03, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | |
Thanks for all your DYK contributions from Richard Garth to Down Street tube station. Freikorp ( talk) 12:18, 31 January 2015 (UTC) |
Template:Citation London Underground performance exits 2003 to 2011 has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Ricky81682 (
talk) 10:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Young (longevity claims researcher) (2nd nomination) EEng ( talk) 01:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Young (longevity claims researcher) (2nd nomination) EEng ( talk) 01:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
David, I cannot thank you too much for the changes you have made to the lists of listed buildings using AWB. I am not particularly good with technology and have never tried to "learn" AWB; I thought that I was going to have to change all the EH references to HE manually! Thanks for saving me many hours of boredom. Best wishes, -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 08:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
{{sfnp|English Heritage|...}}
. There were some other links to English Heritage using {{sfn|English Heritage|...}}
which I haven't changed yet, but they are links to things other than the National Heritage List for England, so they were not broken by the template change (e.g. the first reference in
Listed buildings in Saint Anne's on the Sea). I will change ones that that to the format of the first reference of
Listed buildings in Great Harwood.--
DavidCane (
talk) 09:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC).
A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. Was there anything I left out of the summary that you'd like to see put back in? I'd appreciate it if you could you check the article one more time before its day on the Main Page. - Dank ( push to talk) 21:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Good to see it, precious again, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
David, I've reverted a couple of changes you've recently made with AWB, as it changes the citation style in the article. When an article is using the cite web template with mode=cs2, the change you're making alters the appearance of the resulting citation, and, if the article is already consistently formatted, it also makes the citation different in style from all the others in the article. The whole "mode" thing is relatively new, as far as I can tell, as the old parameter model was a bit different (NB: I'm no wikignome though!) so you might not have come across it before. Cheers! Hchc2009 ( talk) 07:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't know whether you received the ping, but I'm letting you know that User:Vincent60030 asked for your assistance at Talk:Acton Town tube station/GA1, regarding article and citation improvement. Regards, Rcsprinter123 (converse) @ 19:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
We are preparing to take a closer look at Featured articles promoted in 2004–2010 that may need a review. We started with a script-compiled list of older FAs that have not had a recent formal review. The next step is to prune the list by removing articles that are still actively maintained, up-to-date, and believed to meet current standards. We know that many of you personally maintain articles that you nominated, so we'd appreciate your help in winnowing the list where appropriate.
Please take a look at the sandbox list, check over the FAs listed by your name, and indicate on the sandbox talk page your assessment of their current status. Likewise, if you have taken on the maintenance of any listed FAs that were originally nominated by a departed editor, please indicate their status. BLPs should be given especially careful consideration.
Thanks for your help! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Please respond at Wikipedia talk:Unreviewed featured articles/sandbox#Pinging next round; thanks! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. The TFA page currently contains the article lead, but that's about 520 characters too long for TFA; could you edit out the parts you can do without? - Dank ( push to talk) 02:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, David. I'm just posting to let you know that List of works by Charles Holden – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 22. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 22:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
David,
Sorry to be a pain, but you couldn't double-check the edits you're making with the use of AWB on Historic England before saving, could you? There've been several recent edits that have changed the citation style accidentally, and another in which you've auto-changed the owner from English Heritage to Historic England...! :) Hchc2009 ( talk) 13:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi David,
I just wonder if you can help me find the reference for the recent content addition by some other user for the station building part since I am not able to find any reliable source. Thanks! Hope to get Oxford Circus to get good article status! Vincent60030 ( talk) 15:41, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
-- DavidCane ( talk) 18:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Greetings!
I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Hampshire! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 2,690 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in Hampshire.
Hope to see you join! Harej ( talk) 20:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Euston tube station you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ritchie333 --
Ritchie333 (
talk) 12:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
The article
Euston tube station you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Euston tube station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ritchie333 --
Ritchie333 (
talk) 16:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
The article
Euston tube station you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Euston tube station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ritchie333 --
Ritchie333 (
talk) 10:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
I am not sure how you think this edit fixed anything. If it did not, how many other edits that you made at that time may have broken links? -- PBS ( talk) 16:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
You left a comment on Automation of the London Underground saying that the article felt too much like an opinion piece - what in particular made you think this/do you have any suggestions for improvement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Absolutelypuremilk ( talk • contribs) 13:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
If you wish to make use of/develop London Wiki [2] feel free (original research welcome). Jackiespeel ( talk) 09:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I'm pleased to tell you that I've begun reviewing the article
Highgate tube station you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk) 11:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The article
Highgate tube station you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Highgate tube station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk) 23:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
I just wanted to let you know that I have nominated Highgate for DYK! :) Also, can you please reply my earlier message about Oxford Circus tube station? Thanks. Best regards, Vincent60030 ( talk) 06:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Highbury tube station layout.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:46, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Highgate tube station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Highgate tube station had platforms built to accommodate nine-car trains on the Northern line that never used them? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Highgate tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 13:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)