Hi DarmaniLink! I noticed your contributions to Waukesha Christmas parade attack and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Throast {{ping}} me! ( talk | contribs) 21:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey, DarmaniLink! You should add user warning templates on the user's talk page, not their user page. Also, they should be substituted: {{subst:uw-vandalism4im}} instead of {{uw-vandalism4im}}. Make sure to indicate the page vandalized as well: {{subst:uw-vandalism4im|1=[[page name here]]}}. Thanks, Leonidlednev ( talk) 16:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey DarmaniLink! Thank you for your report at AIV. Make sure you sign your comment with ~~~~. Thanks! Tails Wx 01:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Just letting you know that you're always welcome to Wikipedia. I understand if you're new here (so am I), so enjoy your day! ☭MasterWolf-Æthelwulf☭ ( =^._.^= ∫) 18:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC) |
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Saisho Atsushi to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Saisho Atsushi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of aftershocks of the 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mikenorton ( talk) 16:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
On 29 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dianne Feinstein, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — xaosflux Talk 15:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iban people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Betong. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi DarmaniLink. I saw your edit at User talk:138.219.250.5 encouraging him to log in. He won't be logging in because he is globally banned by the WMF and all his known sockpuppets have been blocked too. If you want to know the sordid details, it's all documented here: Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Belteshazzar. Anyway, he has form for trying to canvas unsuspecting people into helping him. So far nobody has fallen for it but I wanted to let you know that he might try to canvas you, either using that IP or whatever IP he alights on next. If he does then please be aware of who he is and that he is up to no good. Thanks. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 01:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi DarmaniLink,
I saw your
WP:WAIT request for the MeidasTouch Page. There has now been multiple sources stating the need for this change and the article in question has now been inaccurate since July. Can you please help facilitate the updating of the page to reflect the accuracy? .
In the past week there are lots of organizations reporting on MeidasTouch's role as a news organization, yet Wikipedia has been slow to catch up with reality. The page as is, is referring to a political action organization that simply does not exist.
https://themessenger.com/politics/trump-gag-order-blatant-violation-judge-engoron
Even the MeidasTouch website about us page linked to on the wikipedia page links to a dead link -- because it links to an organization that no longer exists.
This is the up-to-date accurate page showcasing the up-to-date info:
https://www.meidastouch.com/about-us
Bam21 (
talk) 15:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi DarmaniLink (great username!). I noticed this addition to Talk:MeidasTouch: [1]. I'm assuming your comment is in the wrong location, but just wanted to check with you about it. -- Pinchme123 ( talk) 22:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Mahato is surname which is used by several caste peoples like Kudmi,Koiri, Dhanuk, kumhar, bedia, tharu, dusadh etc. That picture is not true. Mahato of Bangladedh doesnot mean it is kudmi mahato, I am sure it is different mahato. Someone provide fake pictures of Kudmi Mahato for defame Kudmi Mahato caste. Please kindly remove that image from Kudmi Mahato page. शिवराज महतो ( talk) 22:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, DarmaniLink. I've hidden your edit here, including your edit summary. Of course that wasn't for any fault of yours (and I've said so in the log), but purely to hide the nasty "username" you were (very properly) reporting. Bishonen | tålk 12:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC).
Hi DarmaniLink. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 19:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Please help us to revise the important section of the subject article, instead of reverting it.
The Section reverted by you has a pletora of solid references. If you disagree with the neutrality of this Section or the use of certain references, please argue in the talk page of this article.
The removal of well-researched and well-referenced parts of a Wikipedia article constitute vandalism. 2601:646:9A00:6BB0:3DD1:B109:8531:2BC1 ( talk) 00:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
My bad; I did not notice that the edit I reverted was itself reverting previous edits. I was wary of introducing new emphasis on membership of an ethnoreligious group (along the lines of MoS on biographies § Context) without consensus, but this does appear to be supported by consensus for this article. Again, my apologies, and thanks for letting me know. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 02:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Chetsford ( talk) 02:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
Thank you for creating the article Moyai statue: it features a wealth of information about an obscure, but otherwise notable topic.
I would like to help improve the style and prose of the article. However, since I neither have your main source nor know the Japanese language, I'd like to see if you can help me with this. Ideally, I would send you a rewrite I have created, and then you would proofread for factual errors and such.
If you're okay with this, let's move this discussion to the article's talk page. I feel that if we work together, we could potentially create something worthy of a DYK hook or GA nomination. Marisauna ( talk) 18:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the edit, some OK. Don't get this ??? & n b s p ; Please explain Martin Ojsyork ( talk) 17:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
TylerBurden ( talk) 20:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
He also has another sock puppet named " [2]". Sorry that I have to stay anonymous, the person concerned is a bully and loves sending his army to attack people or institutions he does not like. He even sent his army to annoy the US embassy when they rejected his visa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.229.26.175 ( talk) 10:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
I don't know what you are referring to however here is something to understand. People are often busy and you know the sayings "the squeaky wheel gets the grease" as well as "people see what they want to see". That doesn't excuse the behavior going on here. Large amounts of information are being deleted by ElKevbo and Guardian H. Not very many people notice or care. GH wasn't always like this but they have been for more than a year now. Summerdays1 ( talk) 12:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey, could you please add my replies as proposed in this edit request: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia%20talk:Articles%20for%20deletion/Josh%20Cahill&diff=1211318523&oldid=0 ConcurrentState ( talk) 23:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution at that Talk page Billsmith60 ( talk) 09:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
⇒ SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 16:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:
To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron ( talk • she/her), via:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:
See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron ( talk), via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi DarmaniLink! I noticed your contributions to Waukesha Christmas parade attack and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Throast {{ping}} me! ( talk | contribs) 21:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey, DarmaniLink! You should add user warning templates on the user's talk page, not their user page. Also, they should be substituted: {{subst:uw-vandalism4im}} instead of {{uw-vandalism4im}}. Make sure to indicate the page vandalized as well: {{subst:uw-vandalism4im|1=[[page name here]]}}. Thanks, Leonidlednev ( talk) 16:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey DarmaniLink! Thank you for your report at AIV. Make sure you sign your comment with ~~~~. Thanks! Tails Wx 01:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Just letting you know that you're always welcome to Wikipedia. I understand if you're new here (so am I), so enjoy your day! ☭MasterWolf-Æthelwulf☭ ( =^._.^= ∫) 18:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC) |
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Saisho Atsushi to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Saisho Atsushi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of aftershocks of the 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mikenorton ( talk) 16:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
On 29 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dianne Feinstein, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — xaosflux Talk 15:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iban people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Betong. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi DarmaniLink. I saw your edit at User talk:138.219.250.5 encouraging him to log in. He won't be logging in because he is globally banned by the WMF and all his known sockpuppets have been blocked too. If you want to know the sordid details, it's all documented here: Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Belteshazzar. Anyway, he has form for trying to canvas unsuspecting people into helping him. So far nobody has fallen for it but I wanted to let you know that he might try to canvas you, either using that IP or whatever IP he alights on next. If he does then please be aware of who he is and that he is up to no good. Thanks. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 01:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi DarmaniLink,
I saw your
WP:WAIT request for the MeidasTouch Page. There has now been multiple sources stating the need for this change and the article in question has now been inaccurate since July. Can you please help facilitate the updating of the page to reflect the accuracy? .
In the past week there are lots of organizations reporting on MeidasTouch's role as a news organization, yet Wikipedia has been slow to catch up with reality. The page as is, is referring to a political action organization that simply does not exist.
https://themessenger.com/politics/trump-gag-order-blatant-violation-judge-engoron
Even the MeidasTouch website about us page linked to on the wikipedia page links to a dead link -- because it links to an organization that no longer exists.
This is the up-to-date accurate page showcasing the up-to-date info:
https://www.meidastouch.com/about-us
Bam21 (
talk) 15:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi DarmaniLink (great username!). I noticed this addition to Talk:MeidasTouch: [1]. I'm assuming your comment is in the wrong location, but just wanted to check with you about it. -- Pinchme123 ( talk) 22:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Mahato is surname which is used by several caste peoples like Kudmi,Koiri, Dhanuk, kumhar, bedia, tharu, dusadh etc. That picture is not true. Mahato of Bangladedh doesnot mean it is kudmi mahato, I am sure it is different mahato. Someone provide fake pictures of Kudmi Mahato for defame Kudmi Mahato caste. Please kindly remove that image from Kudmi Mahato page. शिवराज महतो ( talk) 22:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, DarmaniLink. I've hidden your edit here, including your edit summary. Of course that wasn't for any fault of yours (and I've said so in the log), but purely to hide the nasty "username" you were (very properly) reporting. Bishonen | tålk 12:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC).
Hi DarmaniLink. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 19:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Please help us to revise the important section of the subject article, instead of reverting it.
The Section reverted by you has a pletora of solid references. If you disagree with the neutrality of this Section or the use of certain references, please argue in the talk page of this article.
The removal of well-researched and well-referenced parts of a Wikipedia article constitute vandalism. 2601:646:9A00:6BB0:3DD1:B109:8531:2BC1 ( talk) 00:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
My bad; I did not notice that the edit I reverted was itself reverting previous edits. I was wary of introducing new emphasis on membership of an ethnoreligious group (along the lines of MoS on biographies § Context) without consensus, but this does appear to be supported by consensus for this article. Again, my apologies, and thanks for letting me know. Tol ( talk | contribs) @ 02:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Chetsford ( talk) 02:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
Thank you for creating the article Moyai statue: it features a wealth of information about an obscure, but otherwise notable topic.
I would like to help improve the style and prose of the article. However, since I neither have your main source nor know the Japanese language, I'd like to see if you can help me with this. Ideally, I would send you a rewrite I have created, and then you would proofread for factual errors and such.
If you're okay with this, let's move this discussion to the article's talk page. I feel that if we work together, we could potentially create something worthy of a DYK hook or GA nomination. Marisauna ( talk) 18:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the edit, some OK. Don't get this ??? & n b s p ; Please explain Martin Ojsyork ( talk) 17:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
TylerBurden ( talk) 20:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
He also has another sock puppet named " [2]". Sorry that I have to stay anonymous, the person concerned is a bully and loves sending his army to attack people or institutions he does not like. He even sent his army to annoy the US embassy when they rejected his visa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.229.26.175 ( talk) 10:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
I don't know what you are referring to however here is something to understand. People are often busy and you know the sayings "the squeaky wheel gets the grease" as well as "people see what they want to see". That doesn't excuse the behavior going on here. Large amounts of information are being deleted by ElKevbo and Guardian H. Not very many people notice or care. GH wasn't always like this but they have been for more than a year now. Summerdays1 ( talk) 12:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey, could you please add my replies as proposed in this edit request: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia%20talk:Articles%20for%20deletion/Josh%20Cahill&diff=1211318523&oldid=0 ConcurrentState ( talk) 23:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution at that Talk page Billsmith60 ( talk) 09:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
⇒ SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 16:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:
To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron ( talk • she/her), via:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:
See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron ( talk), via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)