I can go through the Scream's refs and correct the work and publisher names, if you don't mind. — Mike Allen 22:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
What would the code for that be? </ref/> Scream (film) - Commentary by Wes Craven and Kevin Williamson, time.1:14:25</ref/> ? Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 00:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
...on your very careful edit at The Dark Knight Rises. We may have had a minor difference of opinion, that I think worked out alright, but I want you to know how much I respect your work here. With regards, -- Tenebrae ( talk) 02:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Generally, when we already have an existing film series page any talk about a sequel goes there because it's a reflection of the success of the series (though, technically, the success of the preceding film directly relates to the green light of a new sequel). For example, we don't talk about Quantum of Solace being a sequel to Casino Royale on the CR page, because even though that's a reboot and it is a direct sequel to that film, it's part of a larger series of films based on the character. It's just more appropriate to cover it on a film series/franchise article because when you start covering early development it's going to bog down the preceding film's page with information about a completely new film, whereas it won't do that on the film series page because the page is meant to house info on multiple films. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EddieBrock-Bonding-and-First-Appearance.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 17:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
I wouldn't know how to source that information, there's pictures on the Framestore website of the Two-Face work. Dneg wise we didnt generally have alot of that kind of info on the site or anywhere else. There are sources but they're in magazines mainly. I know all this because I worked on it, my name's in the credits but thanks anyway for removing information
It's not my fault you haven't been keeping up with production from the start. And you cannot use the movie website as a source. Sorry. CloudKade11 ( talk) 22:52, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
I complement you for your hard work on for the article Transformers: Dark of the Moon. You've managed to keep watch for all vandalisms (especially for the Critical Reception area) and you've rewritten the plot with short but concise details. I've actually been reverted a few times by you, but I've come to realize that my edits that have been reverted by you are for the better, and it would be very un-encyclopedic if my edits were still saved. Thank you for your hard work for the other films you've monitored also. Fanaction2031 ( talk) 05:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
I've added your talk-page post to the main page. Thanks and come back helping us. Blackvisionit ( talk) 11:57, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Aside from the two or so instances in which he was present but unseen (as when he pushed Peter onto a subway platform), those were her first full appearances. He described in flashback in #300 how he turned to weightlifting after he was disgraced, so it would be appropriate to say that he had the strength of a weightlifter prior to joining with the Symbiote, since in his earliest appearances, he was already Venom. Nightscream ( talk) 18:47, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
I put back in the parts of your edit that do not conflict with the article content and the talk page consensus regarding what you edited. If you would like to do something other than the consensus, I do not have the authority to allow you to do so, so you'll have to use the Venom talk page, not mine. -- Darktower 12345 05:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I agree. All my good articles were reviewed by experienced editors, but it looks like this guy joined for the sole purpose of passing it. He didn't even make any comments in the review. Bullshit. I can skim through that article and find a dozen grammatical errors right off the bat. -- Boycool ( talk) 16:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Would you mind if you can re-write the film plot for Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King? The other two LOTR films also need rewriting but I don't want to put you under too much stress and work. Or you can choose any LOTR film. I'll try to re-write some of the plots too. Fanaction2031 ( talk) 04:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
So we probably got off on the wrong foot a little, but I had to put that aside when I saw you made a page for Planet of the Symbiotes! It's one of my all-time favorite miniseries! -- Darktower 12345 18:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
"Sllllurpppp, I'm gonna eat your brain Spider-Man!" (Paraphrasing, but wouldn't be surprised if it was word for word somewhere, hahaha.) -- Darktower 12345 18:30, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Cheesy as is was, it was a breath of fresh air back then to have a villain out to rip off his limbs and eat them when compared to those out to "foil" Spider-Man. I think the raw violent intent contributed a lot to all the spin-offs, even though they were mostly half-hearted. I guess it depends on the reader. -- Darktower 12345 21:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Heres to Darkwarriorblake and his tireless work for Transformers: Dark of the Moon! Thanks for keeping the article in great shape, and overpowering the vandalism! Also to your tireless work on the plots for The Lord of the Rings film trilogy! Great stuff. Cheers! Fanaction2031 ( talk) 06:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC) |
Blake, I saw an article about CinemaScore today and recalled the discussion that you started at WT:FILM. Check out the article here! Hope you're well. Erik ( talk | contribs) 12:09, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
I've been asking others, (Boycool, Igor, regular editors of the Dark of the Moon article etc) to help me reach the article to an FA status, and I'll also need your help, Darkwarriorblake. Since I've recently nominated it, and it was opposed to death, I'm going to really push the article to it's limits and make it an FA with others helping me, improving the prose, information, and the overall style of the article. If you do help me, I promise I will do something in return, such as helping your article, Scream, reach it's FA status, as I've seen the old nomination of the article. Cheers! Fanaction2031 ( talk) 03:58, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Why was this removed? The only thing in common with the source material is the name. The setting, characters, literally nothing from the original work is shared with the film. 86.42.202.217 ( talk) 00:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
How about the featured article Superman or the good article Spider-Man? They have the references how I had them, and so do all of the other comic book articles I have edited. I would actually ask you to show me an article (of good or featured quality) that does not have its references like I did.
That is true and that was my mistake. That problem has been corrected.
It is a little harder to read while editing, but you get used to after a while and then it is a non-issue. It actually makes it a lot easier to edit because then the reference is with the sentences it refers to.
A warning for what? Correcting your mistake? Spidey 104 18:11, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Darkwarriorblake. Please see WP:AN3#User:Darkwarriorblake reported by User:Spidey104 (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 03:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Little wrestling joke there....
I did not know about the change for the DVD. Thanks for the head's up — I'll see if I can find some press mention of it somewhere. And you are exactly right: For posterity and historical accuracy, the original theatrical version — which like those of any other film changed for TV, video, etc. — always exists in some vault somewhere. (Movies that aren't "lost," like many silent films, etc., of course.)
I did pick up Iron Man 2 on DVD, so I've got that for reference if anyone needs.
And as someone who appreciate good grammar and clear language, may I just compliment you on "going off the dvd." It makes me cringe whenever I hear someone saying "going off of [this or that]." Thanks for holding the line! -- Tenebrae ( talk)
Hi, Blake. I put together an advisory page based on my experience researching film. Check it out here and let me know what you think! Erik ( talk | contribs) 17:00, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
I know you enjoy trimming plots down, so i'd like to direct your attention to the film My Fellow Americans. I've done some trimming myself, so if you'd like to take a look. Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 2:09 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Isn't the following the correct way to write fiction here (underlined is what is changed from past-tense to present-tense):
<removed "Status">
Brent and Tara are the teenage son and widow of a man named Harold Abbott whose health insurance policy is revoked by William Easton on a technicality, contributing to his death. They are captured and placed in one of two cages at the abandoned Rowan Zoological Institute [1] at the end of William's series of tests, with Pamela Jenkins in the other. Once William reaches the end, Tara and Brent are given the choice of sparing his life or ending it. Despite expressing anger for her husband's death, Tara listens to the pleas for mercy from both William and Pamela, but cannot bring herself to kill William. However, Brent can not forgive him and triggers the device himself, causing a group of needles to swing down into William's back and inject him with hydrofluoric acid. Pamela, Tara, and Brent watches in horror as he dissolves from the inside out.
I notched that is what you did for the List of Scream characters and what I believe is the correct way per the in-universe manual of style guideline. But the Saw characters page does not follow that at all. I'm going to re-write it (or change the words).. but I can imagine fans will not be happy to see their precious "Status: Dead or Alive!" removed. :-D — Mike Allen 02:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
No clue but if Scream has taught me anything, people like to come up with fake names for characters. I don't have a copy of the film on hand to check fo you but I will look into it. Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 11:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I saw you created .../Archive 2 a couple of days ago (and many thanks for what you said there), but it isn't visible at WP:FLC yet. Am I overlooking anything? Cheers, -- Stfg ( talk) 11:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
You seem to spend a lot of time on wikipeida BreakingDexter ( talk) 22:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
But don't you have better things to do with your life BreakingDexter ( talk) 22:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
How the fuck am i wasting your time? BreakingDexter ( talk) 20:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
The posters for Part 2 and Part 5 do not actually match the way the film's titles actually appear. In the first sequel it actually says "Friday the 13th" and then "Part 2" bursts through that moniker. In "A New Beginning", "Part V" never pops up. The poster bills it as "Part V", but the actual film only shows "Friday the 13th" and then when a Jason masks bursts through that moniker "A New Beginning" appears beneath it. That is also why the articles are titled as such. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Erik ( talk | contribs) 16:38, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as
vandalism, such as the edit at
Captain America: The First Avenger, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can
discourage newer editors. Please read
Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.
Sudo
Ghost
19:02, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm curious as to why you've made about 100 edits to T2, but have written nearly zero edit summaries, nor discussed your changes on the Talk page. When doing such a major overhaul, it's hard for the rest of us to follow when we can't immediately understand what you've done and why. Please leave summaries. Thanks.-- TEHodson 00:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Regarding runtime for Real Steel, it is like the other infobox fields in being pieces of information that is not likely to be challenged. I understand that it happened with The Terminator 2, but for the most part, it does not get disputed. It's just an extraneous citation, and I don't want to give the impression that an inline citation is required for that particular detail. Erik ( talk | contribs) 15:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. It's good to be working with you again! Re this diff, the clarification I really wanted was the meaning of the phrase "market numbers", rather than the numbers themselves. I think it means number of countries, but am not 100% sure. Cheers, -- Stfg ( talk) 22:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
I thought Scream 4 was nominated for GA? Anyways, if no one gets to Horrible Bosses by this weekend, I'll try and review it. But just glancing at the references, there are some that are "variety.com ( Variety)" and then some are " Los Angeles Times ( Tribune Company)". Personally I prefer the second format but it appears most of the refs are in the first format, so they should all be consistent. — Mike Allen 03:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
work=variety.com|publisher=
Variety
; have the work as Variety and the publisher as Reed Business Information, who actually publishes the magazine. I guess it's correct to say that the magazine Variety publishes the online site, variety.com, but all the refs should be in the format of listing the url as the work, etc. I don't know about Scream 4, I put on my userpage that it was a GA nomination, I guess I was just planning for it to be soon. Like after the DVD is released and the commentary can be listened to. —
Mike
Allen
21:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Horrible bosses bluray.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
20:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
He's referred to as Lue on IMDB. I couldn't find any for Seoul-Oh, in fact. The official document doesn't mention a given name, and nor do some other refs I checked. Hope this helps. -- Stfg ( talk) 12:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Well, I am awaiting Arkham City, but for Arkham Asylum I'm just removing NFC that fails the criteria for inclusion. The same problem with album covers exists in film articles. I just happen to be waiting for Arkham City and ventured over to Arkham Asylum a few weeks ago and noticed the album covers. I did the same to Gears of War and Gears of War 2, which had the same issue after I was waiting to receive Gears 3. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
That sentence is speculative without a reference to support your comment of "the guy playing Selvig has confirmed what is happening in it." Spidey 104 14:09, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Darkwarriorblake! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 23:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik ( talk | contribs) 11:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
This article is riddled with unsourced content and half the sourced content comes from blogs and Youtube. We could use your help to straighten it out. # Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 14:20 15 October 2011
Hi. In Captain America: The First Avenger, I used the term 'anabolic' in its literal sense, "the synthesis of complex molecules in living organisms from simpler ones together with the storage of energy; constructive metabolism," not to imply steroids, although the source reference tongue-in-cheek (in my opinion) hinted it could be a precursor. The original adjective 'special' was extremely weak and the source prompted me to use a stronger modifier, i.e., anabolic. I don't object to your use of 'specialized' because almost any adjective would be stronger than the original.
The source reference did correctly call the VTOL and flying wing and I do think that reference should be restored.
best regards, -- UnicornTapestry ( talk) 19:31, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello there,
You reverted a recent edit (for the plot of FotR) saying I'd 'broken the page'; as a relative newbie to Wiki codes I'd be really grateful if you'd let me know how I did that so I don't accidentally do it again! It's worrying though, as I did check the preview page several times before hitting 'submit' and nothing was amiss then.
As for the changes themselves, which you referred to as unnecessary, I'd actually corrected a few mistakes in the plot (which are back again now) and shortened the section by 100 words - I thought that would be desireable as it was 'bloated' before?
Thanks.
Bohwe (
talk)
16:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
The trailer was released, watch here. — Mike Allen 11:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
I have not made a request. If you are familiar with the Guild, can you do it? Also any other tips, I have never nominated an article before?-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 15:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
I have created the article for the film adaption and i'd like your opinion and skills to help better it. Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 23:57 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Blake, sorry if I seem crass, but didn't BreakingDexter ask you if you " Had a social life" because you "spend a lot of time on Wikipedia"? Yet he's the one with 11 confirmed sock puppets. Who has the free time to string all those puppets together? lol — Mike Allen 16:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
For your significant contributions that helped promote Captain America: The First Avenger to good article status.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 21:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
For your significant contributions that helped promote Thor (film) to good article status.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 17:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
This is a neutral notice that you were involved in a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Archive 35#Overly detailed box office sections for Disney films, and may wish to participate in a discussion about changes to WP:FILM box-office guidelines, at WT:MOSFILM#Box office revision.-- Tenebrae ( talk) 22:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Just informing I posted my opinion for Fast Five on WIKI:MOS/FILM. Spinc5 ( talk) 14:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey be careful about WP:3RR on The Hangover Part II. I agree the currencies should be converted, since the film is an American film and the rest of the currencies used in the article is US dollars. Might want to take it to the talk page. Admins take 3RR pretty seriously and will issue a 24 hour block. — Mike Allen 23:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Erik ( talk | contribs) 15:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I invite you to view my post on the Wikiproject Film talkpage about improving a select list of films. RAP ( talk) 2:30 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Just to let you know the four characters I added to the On Stranger Tides page are fairly important characters and had important roles in the movie as Blackbeard's zombies so if you don't mind I'm going to add the info back to the page. - -- Steven Bjerke 21:15, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
For your work on Tower Heist starting in October 2011 — Mike Allen 04:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC) |
You think I'm making up the 37 top critics number? Here, a screenshot: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6118/6314618293_3a0953b807_b.jpg. But if you want, I can give you a list with the name of the critics, the name of the newspapers they work for and the quotes RT used from their reviews. And there are usually more than 15 reviews from "top critics". Aquila89 ( talk) 14:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
The issue of the cosmic cube has come up again, your opinion on is welcomed.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 18:30, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Look, I'm terribly sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but I'm going to need to undo your edits on the plot for Batman: Arkham City. The reason why it was that original length is because it kept getting marked for removal by other editors who claimed it was 'too long'. In addition, we don't really need some of the details you threw in there, such as the "pretty funny" quote and "Batman carries Joker's corpse out of Arkham, etc, etc, then walks away" instead of just "Batman carries the Joker's corpse out of Arkham into a breaking dawn".
The reason why so much emphasis was put on the beginning is to help readers understand the background a little better, and explain some things which haven't already been covered in the 'Settings' section. Yes, it was a pain for me to keep reducing the plot from its original length down by about three hundred words to its present state, but even then there were a few who wanted this summary to be as short as Batman: Arkham Asylum's, so it was a squeeze even as it stood. Again, I sincerely feel for the work which you may lose, as I had to endure the same thing about a week ago with the Wikipedia community. However, the plot section needs to stay the way it is, and I'm afraid that all the grammatical errors and repeat sentences your new summary is riddled with aren't helping things. -- Katangais ( talk) 05:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I have beat it. I wrote a new treatment on the talk page. It's based on your rewrite, but it's been trimmed some and slightly reworded. I don't think there was anything really wrong with yours. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:21, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I admit to being surprised by this. I know who Singh is; it took me a moment yesterday to realize that this fellow must be Singh.
If you check online, you will see some reviews for The Fall where apparently he was using his name in this style as well.
Cheers,
Varlaam (
talk)
15:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC) (Toronto)
I believe i've just completed my best contribution yet. It only has (film) in the title due to a redirect obstructing me calling it just Star Trek 2. Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 2:35 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick reply! -- Boycool ( talk) 00:51, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
So put "Citation needed." Don't just erase it altogether. Wikipedia's for sharing info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.190.11 ( talk) 12:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
True that. It would have been amazing if it were. Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 23:17 25 November 2011 (UTC)
You may want to be careful. User:Robsinden is taking WP:NFF to a whole new level and redirect every film that hasn't begun filming. Burt Wonderstone could fall onto his radar. RAP ( talk) 2:14 30 November 2011 (UTC)
The June 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Peppage ( talk | contribs) 22:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
For displaying the wisdom of Solomon and the patience of Job on
The Dark Knight Rises. Despite the influx of edits and cosntant changes to the page, you have somehow managed to keep it coherent and concise without losing taking it too seriously. Sterling effort, mate. You deserve this.
Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 02:04, 11 December 2011 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burt Wonderstone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burt Wonderstone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 ( talk) 18:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
http://www.latinoreview.com/news/poster-for-the-expendables-2-15641. RAP ( talk) 12:52 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about that. You guys over at The Dark Knight Rises do things very differently to what I'm used to. I wanted to get the information in there, but because I can never find the full references, I had no template to go by, so I didn't know what was necessary for a reference under WP:Film. Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 06:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
This is a neutral request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#The Hobbit.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 14:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Batman: Arkham City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Condé Nast ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:35, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
—
Mike
Allen is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Xmas,
Eid,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec11}} to your friends' talk pages.
Congrats on Tower Heist. I am currently buffing up Cowboys & Aliens for GA. It hasn't been reviewed yet, so there's still some time to make noticable changes. RAP ( talk) 0:53 27 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
For your significant contributions that helped promote Cowboys & Aliens to good article status.-- Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 15:41, 31 December 2011 (UTC) |
Hi D. Your reply to my joke is stupendous. I know that I was channeling Douglas Adams (poorly I'm sure) in my post but your reply makes the whole thing worthwhile. In fact I think that there might be universal acclaim for its good humor. Cheers and have a great 2012 on wiki and off. MarnetteD | Talk 20:11, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Could not really understand the reason you reverted the edits. Can you elaborate. Swapnils2106 T 22:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I am just trying to highlight the way the makers of that movie have combined the end of the movie with the actual end of Sherlock Holmes in 'The Final Problem'. I guess I am just trying to make the readers aware of how meticulously have the makers of that movie worked up to form a plot similar to the book. Is there a way I can do that? Swapnils2106 T 19:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Happy New Year! I see that Captain America: The First Avenger made GA before we got to copy editing it. Congratulations! Do you still want a C/E done, or may I remove the request from the page? Best, -- Stfg ( talk) 13:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Peppage ( talk | contribs) 22:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Saturday Night Live, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Care to explain? -- 87.78.52.247 ( talk) 18:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Calabe 1992 16:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
As I said to the other editor, threats are unbecoming, especially ones that are cut and paste by someone who is not an administrator. Your reverts are basically pointless since they are linking to an article about a mere shape and not the artifact that is clearly being portrayed in the film. The shape of the tesseract tells nothing about the source material on which the film is based, and is a redundant inclusion on the article's plot outline. Linking to the Cube is relevant given the film's source material, and allows a reader further insight into the material that brought about the creation of the film. Ganthet2814 ( talk) 20:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Darkwarriorblake!
It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Terminator.ogg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.
If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.
Thanks again! -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 16:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello there,
I have created a main page for the Paranormal Activity films as a whole that you can get to here; Paranormal Activity (film series)
I have seen your frequent work on the Paranormal Activity page and I wondered if you would like to help on this page. I would do it myself and I did try to but I'm not 100% certain on how to create certain things like the box that would show the characters and what films they appear in and also the difference in critical reception from different sites.
The reason I created a main page is that the series is big enough to have a main page of it's own now and with a fourth film coming out and possibly more depending on the next one.
But I would appreciate your help on the page, I will try to add things in but I thought that as you have helped on the Paranormal Activity pages already you would be interested in helping to edit this one.
Charlr6 ( talk) 22:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
When you said "we don't include Top Critics because people see different ratings and number of reviews based on where they are viewing RT from", I don't know what you mean. -- Superghost987 ( talk) 23:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
I can go through the Scream's refs and correct the work and publisher names, if you don't mind. — Mike Allen 22:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
What would the code for that be? </ref/> Scream (film) - Commentary by Wes Craven and Kevin Williamson, time.1:14:25</ref/> ? Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 00:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
...on your very careful edit at The Dark Knight Rises. We may have had a minor difference of opinion, that I think worked out alright, but I want you to know how much I respect your work here. With regards, -- Tenebrae ( talk) 02:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Generally, when we already have an existing film series page any talk about a sequel goes there because it's a reflection of the success of the series (though, technically, the success of the preceding film directly relates to the green light of a new sequel). For example, we don't talk about Quantum of Solace being a sequel to Casino Royale on the CR page, because even though that's a reboot and it is a direct sequel to that film, it's part of a larger series of films based on the character. It's just more appropriate to cover it on a film series/franchise article because when you start covering early development it's going to bog down the preceding film's page with information about a completely new film, whereas it won't do that on the film series page because the page is meant to house info on multiple films. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EddieBrock-Bonding-and-First-Appearance.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 17:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
I wouldn't know how to source that information, there's pictures on the Framestore website of the Two-Face work. Dneg wise we didnt generally have alot of that kind of info on the site or anywhere else. There are sources but they're in magazines mainly. I know all this because I worked on it, my name's in the credits but thanks anyway for removing information
It's not my fault you haven't been keeping up with production from the start. And you cannot use the movie website as a source. Sorry. CloudKade11 ( talk) 22:52, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
I complement you for your hard work on for the article Transformers: Dark of the Moon. You've managed to keep watch for all vandalisms (especially for the Critical Reception area) and you've rewritten the plot with short but concise details. I've actually been reverted a few times by you, but I've come to realize that my edits that have been reverted by you are for the better, and it would be very un-encyclopedic if my edits were still saved. Thank you for your hard work for the other films you've monitored also. Fanaction2031 ( talk) 05:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
I've added your talk-page post to the main page. Thanks and come back helping us. Blackvisionit ( talk) 11:57, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Aside from the two or so instances in which he was present but unseen (as when he pushed Peter onto a subway platform), those were her first full appearances. He described in flashback in #300 how he turned to weightlifting after he was disgraced, so it would be appropriate to say that he had the strength of a weightlifter prior to joining with the Symbiote, since in his earliest appearances, he was already Venom. Nightscream ( talk) 18:47, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
I put back in the parts of your edit that do not conflict with the article content and the talk page consensus regarding what you edited. If you would like to do something other than the consensus, I do not have the authority to allow you to do so, so you'll have to use the Venom talk page, not mine. -- Darktower 12345 05:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I agree. All my good articles were reviewed by experienced editors, but it looks like this guy joined for the sole purpose of passing it. He didn't even make any comments in the review. Bullshit. I can skim through that article and find a dozen grammatical errors right off the bat. -- Boycool ( talk) 16:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Would you mind if you can re-write the film plot for Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King? The other two LOTR films also need rewriting but I don't want to put you under too much stress and work. Or you can choose any LOTR film. I'll try to re-write some of the plots too. Fanaction2031 ( talk) 04:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
So we probably got off on the wrong foot a little, but I had to put that aside when I saw you made a page for Planet of the Symbiotes! It's one of my all-time favorite miniseries! -- Darktower 12345 18:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
"Sllllurpppp, I'm gonna eat your brain Spider-Man!" (Paraphrasing, but wouldn't be surprised if it was word for word somewhere, hahaha.) -- Darktower 12345 18:30, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Cheesy as is was, it was a breath of fresh air back then to have a villain out to rip off his limbs and eat them when compared to those out to "foil" Spider-Man. I think the raw violent intent contributed a lot to all the spin-offs, even though they were mostly half-hearted. I guess it depends on the reader. -- Darktower 12345 21:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Heres to Darkwarriorblake and his tireless work for Transformers: Dark of the Moon! Thanks for keeping the article in great shape, and overpowering the vandalism! Also to your tireless work on the plots for The Lord of the Rings film trilogy! Great stuff. Cheers! Fanaction2031 ( talk) 06:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC) |
Blake, I saw an article about CinemaScore today and recalled the discussion that you started at WT:FILM. Check out the article here! Hope you're well. Erik ( talk | contribs) 12:09, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
I've been asking others, (Boycool, Igor, regular editors of the Dark of the Moon article etc) to help me reach the article to an FA status, and I'll also need your help, Darkwarriorblake. Since I've recently nominated it, and it was opposed to death, I'm going to really push the article to it's limits and make it an FA with others helping me, improving the prose, information, and the overall style of the article. If you do help me, I promise I will do something in return, such as helping your article, Scream, reach it's FA status, as I've seen the old nomination of the article. Cheers! Fanaction2031 ( talk) 03:58, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Why was this removed? The only thing in common with the source material is the name. The setting, characters, literally nothing from the original work is shared with the film. 86.42.202.217 ( talk) 00:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
How about the featured article Superman or the good article Spider-Man? They have the references how I had them, and so do all of the other comic book articles I have edited. I would actually ask you to show me an article (of good or featured quality) that does not have its references like I did.
That is true and that was my mistake. That problem has been corrected.
It is a little harder to read while editing, but you get used to after a while and then it is a non-issue. It actually makes it a lot easier to edit because then the reference is with the sentences it refers to.
A warning for what? Correcting your mistake? Spidey 104 18:11, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Darkwarriorblake. Please see WP:AN3#User:Darkwarriorblake reported by User:Spidey104 (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 03:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Little wrestling joke there....
I did not know about the change for the DVD. Thanks for the head's up — I'll see if I can find some press mention of it somewhere. And you are exactly right: For posterity and historical accuracy, the original theatrical version — which like those of any other film changed for TV, video, etc. — always exists in some vault somewhere. (Movies that aren't "lost," like many silent films, etc., of course.)
I did pick up Iron Man 2 on DVD, so I've got that for reference if anyone needs.
And as someone who appreciate good grammar and clear language, may I just compliment you on "going off the dvd." It makes me cringe whenever I hear someone saying "going off of [this or that]." Thanks for holding the line! -- Tenebrae ( talk)
Hi, Blake. I put together an advisory page based on my experience researching film. Check it out here and let me know what you think! Erik ( talk | contribs) 17:00, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
I know you enjoy trimming plots down, so i'd like to direct your attention to the film My Fellow Americans. I've done some trimming myself, so if you'd like to take a look. Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 2:09 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Isn't the following the correct way to write fiction here (underlined is what is changed from past-tense to present-tense):
<removed "Status">
Brent and Tara are the teenage son and widow of a man named Harold Abbott whose health insurance policy is revoked by William Easton on a technicality, contributing to his death. They are captured and placed in one of two cages at the abandoned Rowan Zoological Institute [1] at the end of William's series of tests, with Pamela Jenkins in the other. Once William reaches the end, Tara and Brent are given the choice of sparing his life or ending it. Despite expressing anger for her husband's death, Tara listens to the pleas for mercy from both William and Pamela, but cannot bring herself to kill William. However, Brent can not forgive him and triggers the device himself, causing a group of needles to swing down into William's back and inject him with hydrofluoric acid. Pamela, Tara, and Brent watches in horror as he dissolves from the inside out.
I notched that is what you did for the List of Scream characters and what I believe is the correct way per the in-universe manual of style guideline. But the Saw characters page does not follow that at all. I'm going to re-write it (or change the words).. but I can imagine fans will not be happy to see their precious "Status: Dead or Alive!" removed. :-D — Mike Allen 02:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
No clue but if Scream has taught me anything, people like to come up with fake names for characters. I don't have a copy of the film on hand to check fo you but I will look into it. Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 11:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I saw you created .../Archive 2 a couple of days ago (and many thanks for what you said there), but it isn't visible at WP:FLC yet. Am I overlooking anything? Cheers, -- Stfg ( talk) 11:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
You seem to spend a lot of time on wikipeida BreakingDexter ( talk) 22:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
But don't you have better things to do with your life BreakingDexter ( talk) 22:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
How the fuck am i wasting your time? BreakingDexter ( talk) 20:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
The posters for Part 2 and Part 5 do not actually match the way the film's titles actually appear. In the first sequel it actually says "Friday the 13th" and then "Part 2" bursts through that moniker. In "A New Beginning", "Part V" never pops up. The poster bills it as "Part V", but the actual film only shows "Friday the 13th" and then when a Jason masks bursts through that moniker "A New Beginning" appears beneath it. That is also why the articles are titled as such. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Erik ( talk | contribs) 16:38, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as
vandalism, such as the edit at
Captain America: The First Avenger, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can
discourage newer editors. Please read
Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.
Sudo
Ghost
19:02, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm curious as to why you've made about 100 edits to T2, but have written nearly zero edit summaries, nor discussed your changes on the Talk page. When doing such a major overhaul, it's hard for the rest of us to follow when we can't immediately understand what you've done and why. Please leave summaries. Thanks.-- TEHodson 00:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Regarding runtime for Real Steel, it is like the other infobox fields in being pieces of information that is not likely to be challenged. I understand that it happened with The Terminator 2, but for the most part, it does not get disputed. It's just an extraneous citation, and I don't want to give the impression that an inline citation is required for that particular detail. Erik ( talk | contribs) 15:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. It's good to be working with you again! Re this diff, the clarification I really wanted was the meaning of the phrase "market numbers", rather than the numbers themselves. I think it means number of countries, but am not 100% sure. Cheers, -- Stfg ( talk) 22:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
I thought Scream 4 was nominated for GA? Anyways, if no one gets to Horrible Bosses by this weekend, I'll try and review it. But just glancing at the references, there are some that are "variety.com ( Variety)" and then some are " Los Angeles Times ( Tribune Company)". Personally I prefer the second format but it appears most of the refs are in the first format, so they should all be consistent. — Mike Allen 03:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
work=variety.com|publisher=
Variety
; have the work as Variety and the publisher as Reed Business Information, who actually publishes the magazine. I guess it's correct to say that the magazine Variety publishes the online site, variety.com, but all the refs should be in the format of listing the url as the work, etc. I don't know about Scream 4, I put on my userpage that it was a GA nomination, I guess I was just planning for it to be soon. Like after the DVD is released and the commentary can be listened to. —
Mike
Allen
21:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Horrible bosses bluray.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
20:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
He's referred to as Lue on IMDB. I couldn't find any for Seoul-Oh, in fact. The official document doesn't mention a given name, and nor do some other refs I checked. Hope this helps. -- Stfg ( talk) 12:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Well, I am awaiting Arkham City, but for Arkham Asylum I'm just removing NFC that fails the criteria for inclusion. The same problem with album covers exists in film articles. I just happen to be waiting for Arkham City and ventured over to Arkham Asylum a few weeks ago and noticed the album covers. I did the same to Gears of War and Gears of War 2, which had the same issue after I was waiting to receive Gears 3. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
That sentence is speculative without a reference to support your comment of "the guy playing Selvig has confirmed what is happening in it." Spidey 104 14:09, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Darkwarriorblake! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 23:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik ( talk | contribs) 11:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
This article is riddled with unsourced content and half the sourced content comes from blogs and Youtube. We could use your help to straighten it out. # Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 14:20 15 October 2011
Hi. In Captain America: The First Avenger, I used the term 'anabolic' in its literal sense, "the synthesis of complex molecules in living organisms from simpler ones together with the storage of energy; constructive metabolism," not to imply steroids, although the source reference tongue-in-cheek (in my opinion) hinted it could be a precursor. The original adjective 'special' was extremely weak and the source prompted me to use a stronger modifier, i.e., anabolic. I don't object to your use of 'specialized' because almost any adjective would be stronger than the original.
The source reference did correctly call the VTOL and flying wing and I do think that reference should be restored.
best regards, -- UnicornTapestry ( talk) 19:31, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello there,
You reverted a recent edit (for the plot of FotR) saying I'd 'broken the page'; as a relative newbie to Wiki codes I'd be really grateful if you'd let me know how I did that so I don't accidentally do it again! It's worrying though, as I did check the preview page several times before hitting 'submit' and nothing was amiss then.
As for the changes themselves, which you referred to as unnecessary, I'd actually corrected a few mistakes in the plot (which are back again now) and shortened the section by 100 words - I thought that would be desireable as it was 'bloated' before?
Thanks.
Bohwe (
talk)
16:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
The trailer was released, watch here. — Mike Allen 11:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
I have not made a request. If you are familiar with the Guild, can you do it? Also any other tips, I have never nominated an article before?-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 15:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
I have created the article for the film adaption and i'd like your opinion and skills to help better it. Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 23:57 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Blake, sorry if I seem crass, but didn't BreakingDexter ask you if you " Had a social life" because you "spend a lot of time on Wikipedia"? Yet he's the one with 11 confirmed sock puppets. Who has the free time to string all those puppets together? lol — Mike Allen 16:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
For your significant contributions that helped promote Captain America: The First Avenger to good article status.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 21:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
For your significant contributions that helped promote Thor (film) to good article status.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 17:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
This is a neutral notice that you were involved in a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Archive 35#Overly detailed box office sections for Disney films, and may wish to participate in a discussion about changes to WP:FILM box-office guidelines, at WT:MOSFILM#Box office revision.-- Tenebrae ( talk) 22:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Just informing I posted my opinion for Fast Five on WIKI:MOS/FILM. Spinc5 ( talk) 14:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey be careful about WP:3RR on The Hangover Part II. I agree the currencies should be converted, since the film is an American film and the rest of the currencies used in the article is US dollars. Might want to take it to the talk page. Admins take 3RR pretty seriously and will issue a 24 hour block. — Mike Allen 23:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Erik ( talk | contribs) 15:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I invite you to view my post on the Wikiproject Film talkpage about improving a select list of films. RAP ( talk) 2:30 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Just to let you know the four characters I added to the On Stranger Tides page are fairly important characters and had important roles in the movie as Blackbeard's zombies so if you don't mind I'm going to add the info back to the page. - -- Steven Bjerke 21:15, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
For your work on Tower Heist starting in October 2011 — Mike Allen 04:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC) |
You think I'm making up the 37 top critics number? Here, a screenshot: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6118/6314618293_3a0953b807_b.jpg. But if you want, I can give you a list with the name of the critics, the name of the newspapers they work for and the quotes RT used from their reviews. And there are usually more than 15 reviews from "top critics". Aquila89 ( talk) 14:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
The issue of the cosmic cube has come up again, your opinion on is welcomed.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 18:30, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Look, I'm terribly sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but I'm going to need to undo your edits on the plot for Batman: Arkham City. The reason why it was that original length is because it kept getting marked for removal by other editors who claimed it was 'too long'. In addition, we don't really need some of the details you threw in there, such as the "pretty funny" quote and "Batman carries Joker's corpse out of Arkham, etc, etc, then walks away" instead of just "Batman carries the Joker's corpse out of Arkham into a breaking dawn".
The reason why so much emphasis was put on the beginning is to help readers understand the background a little better, and explain some things which haven't already been covered in the 'Settings' section. Yes, it was a pain for me to keep reducing the plot from its original length down by about three hundred words to its present state, but even then there were a few who wanted this summary to be as short as Batman: Arkham Asylum's, so it was a squeeze even as it stood. Again, I sincerely feel for the work which you may lose, as I had to endure the same thing about a week ago with the Wikipedia community. However, the plot section needs to stay the way it is, and I'm afraid that all the grammatical errors and repeat sentences your new summary is riddled with aren't helping things. -- Katangais ( talk) 05:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I have beat it. I wrote a new treatment on the talk page. It's based on your rewrite, but it's been trimmed some and slightly reworded. I don't think there was anything really wrong with yours. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:21, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I admit to being surprised by this. I know who Singh is; it took me a moment yesterday to realize that this fellow must be Singh.
If you check online, you will see some reviews for The Fall where apparently he was using his name in this style as well.
Cheers,
Varlaam (
talk)
15:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC) (Toronto)
I believe i've just completed my best contribution yet. It only has (film) in the title due to a redirect obstructing me calling it just Star Trek 2. Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 2:35 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick reply! -- Boycool ( talk) 00:51, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
So put "Citation needed." Don't just erase it altogether. Wikipedia's for sharing info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.190.11 ( talk) 12:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
True that. It would have been amazing if it were. Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 23:17 25 November 2011 (UTC)
You may want to be careful. User:Robsinden is taking WP:NFF to a whole new level and redirect every film that hasn't begun filming. Burt Wonderstone could fall onto his radar. RAP ( talk) 2:14 30 November 2011 (UTC)
The June 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Peppage ( talk | contribs) 22:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
For displaying the wisdom of Solomon and the patience of Job on
The Dark Knight Rises. Despite the influx of edits and cosntant changes to the page, you have somehow managed to keep it coherent and concise without losing taking it too seriously. Sterling effort, mate. You deserve this.
Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 02:04, 11 December 2011 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burt Wonderstone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burt Wonderstone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 ( talk) 18:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
http://www.latinoreview.com/news/poster-for-the-expendables-2-15641. RAP ( talk) 12:52 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about that. You guys over at The Dark Knight Rises do things very differently to what I'm used to. I wanted to get the information in there, but because I can never find the full references, I had no template to go by, so I didn't know what was necessary for a reference under WP:Film. Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 06:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
This is a neutral request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#The Hobbit.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 14:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Batman: Arkham City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Condé Nast ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:35, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
—
Mike
Allen is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Xmas,
Eid,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec11}} to your friends' talk pages.
Congrats on Tower Heist. I am currently buffing up Cowboys & Aliens for GA. It hasn't been reviewed yet, so there's still some time to make noticable changes. RAP ( talk) 0:53 27 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
For your significant contributions that helped promote Cowboys & Aliens to good article status.-- Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 15:41, 31 December 2011 (UTC) |
Hi D. Your reply to my joke is stupendous. I know that I was channeling Douglas Adams (poorly I'm sure) in my post but your reply makes the whole thing worthwhile. In fact I think that there might be universal acclaim for its good humor. Cheers and have a great 2012 on wiki and off. MarnetteD | Talk 20:11, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Could not really understand the reason you reverted the edits. Can you elaborate. Swapnils2106 T 22:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I am just trying to highlight the way the makers of that movie have combined the end of the movie with the actual end of Sherlock Holmes in 'The Final Problem'. I guess I am just trying to make the readers aware of how meticulously have the makers of that movie worked up to form a plot similar to the book. Is there a way I can do that? Swapnils2106 T 19:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Happy New Year! I see that Captain America: The First Avenger made GA before we got to copy editing it. Congratulations! Do you still want a C/E done, or may I remove the request from the page? Best, -- Stfg ( talk) 13:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Peppage ( talk | contribs) 22:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Saturday Night Live, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Care to explain? -- 87.78.52.247 ( talk) 18:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Calabe 1992 16:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
As I said to the other editor, threats are unbecoming, especially ones that are cut and paste by someone who is not an administrator. Your reverts are basically pointless since they are linking to an article about a mere shape and not the artifact that is clearly being portrayed in the film. The shape of the tesseract tells nothing about the source material on which the film is based, and is a redundant inclusion on the article's plot outline. Linking to the Cube is relevant given the film's source material, and allows a reader further insight into the material that brought about the creation of the film. Ganthet2814 ( talk) 20:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Darkwarriorblake!
It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Terminator.ogg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.
If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.
Thanks again! -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 16:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello there,
I have created a main page for the Paranormal Activity films as a whole that you can get to here; Paranormal Activity (film series)
I have seen your frequent work on the Paranormal Activity page and I wondered if you would like to help on this page. I would do it myself and I did try to but I'm not 100% certain on how to create certain things like the box that would show the characters and what films they appear in and also the difference in critical reception from different sites.
The reason I created a main page is that the series is big enough to have a main page of it's own now and with a fourth film coming out and possibly more depending on the next one.
But I would appreciate your help on the page, I will try to add things in but I thought that as you have helped on the Paranormal Activity pages already you would be interested in helping to edit this one.
Charlr6 ( talk) 22:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
When you said "we don't include Top Critics because people see different ratings and number of reviews based on where they are viewing RT from", I don't know what you mean. -- Superghost987 ( talk) 23:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)