![]() Archives |
---|
Thank you for watching my user page! It's remarkable what sorts of exchanges one gets with people who find their spam/vanity bios tagged for speedy deletion. In this instance of vandalism, I suspect it may be related to this exchange, which is probably amusing to read for the sheer indignation the poor guy exhibits... Best, Sandstein 21:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Love the idea. I've been thinking along similar lines regarding the wikiproject - but with a broader scope; I started the notice board a while ago, but it only me that seems to post anything to it. I was thinking about some kind of weekly newletter that we could transclude to project members - the trouble is I don't really have the time to devote to it - and yourself and dogears are in similar situations I presume. Maybe I'll post the suggestion to the notice board this week and see if anyone steps up. The idea would be to include everyone's work in progress, new articles, GA's, FA's current discussions, help wanted etc. etc. It might foster a sense of community and keep the left hand informed of the right hand's actions. Regards -- Mcginnly | Natter 23:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
PS. I sent you an email. -- Mcginnly | Natter 00:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorted -- Mcginnly | Natter 22:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
protecting my userpage. KOS | talk 20:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Nice work, and moral support! But off duty at the moment. Tyrenius 03:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I see that you are an administrator. I would like some feedback on the above article please. Although I have been reading up on policies, I would like to get the opinions of more experienced editors before I proceed. Thank you. Tidaress 03:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Wow, amazing, how on earth...? I love it! File:SoleteRayosÑajo.gif Bishonen | talk 17:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC).
Thanks for taming the runaway bot! -- Wetman 04:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! -- Srik e it ( Talk | Email) 20:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Caveat contributor: (Especially) among the upper echelons wikipedia works on the cult principles of control and domination: their control, your domination. To some (high positioned) Wikipedia is not a GAME but rather a RELIGION.-- 4.245.245.64 03:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for the encourgament! I have just completed a bio on Elia Zengelis and got a shock when it was immediately proposed by the 'delete police' that it should be removed, as he is not important enough, and that he could be simply included under OMA! I'm going to defend his inclusion in his own right! I agree that the Eisenman page is thin in comparision to his importance. I myself already added to it some references to interviews, but I'd be delighted to have a look at the theoretical issues - especailly as they have chnaged during his career - from structuralism to post-structuralism and psychoanalysis.-- TTKK 08:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok it's not in vegas but this would be an absolutely great example of a duck if ever we get to writing the article. -- Mcginnly | Natter 19:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Answered your post on User_talk:Dina#Stop_your_revert-vandalism -- 62.147.39.202 05:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism from breaking WP:REVERT, WP:MOSDAB, and acting disingenuously:
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
-- 62.147.86.249 08:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I've proposed a solution at User talk:Dina -- Dweller 10:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
GOOD NEWS - User:Dweller provided a brilliant solution (he created a stub with notability claim and will send it direct to AFD to test if article and dab link should stay), detailled at User_talk:Dina#Stop_your_revert-vandalism -- 62.147.86.249 11:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Dina 13:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, this image suffers from a lack of infos. It was migrated from en: to commons. You delete the old version. May you give me the original description text of this picutre to complete the current version on Commons ? Best regards Kelson 08:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
-- GeeJo (t)⁄ (c) • 08:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
User:24.147.162.153 continues to vandalize pages since his/her last block. Since you handled the last one, perhaps you can handle this one. Thank you. -- Jayron 32 17:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
He/She has repeatedly removed your vandalism warnings from the talk page connected to edits to the Dir en grey article. I've had to revert it twice and restore it once because it was undetected by a bot posting an image problem warning; and even that warning has been deleted at least once by this troll. Just a heads up... Ranma9617 21:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Another château. We haven't come near to presenting articles on just the best and most beautiful. French Wikipedia doesn't cover this jewel yet. I do hope you don't mind my tweaking your articles. -- Wetman 07:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Now that there's the three of us updating the Portal, you can use the "roster" link on that new Toolbar to see who's doing the rotation this week. — Dogears 01:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm confused; can you tell me what happened? Has the image been removed from the Commons? Tony 14:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I should have messaged you when I replaced the image. Thanks for your comments! Tony 04:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[1] A fairer member I cannot imagine. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you candidacy. -- Mcginnly | Natter 23:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
You're welcome, but it still seems kind of slim for such an important topic..maybe later this month I'll try and expand it...Novickas 15:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Yours flapped and moved. Did you not see that I shot the last animated bird someone put on my talk page? Thanks, I went with a more traditional bumpersticker but stole your text. KillerChihuahua ?!? 01:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Would you mind changing the style of your advertisement User:DVD R W/User Fo'Flo' so that it doesn't overwrite important information on the web pages it appears on? Also, that advertisement would be better placed on a user page rather than a user talk page. Talk pages are for discussion. — Psychonaut 10:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey! I remember you said on my 2nd RfA that I was one of the first users you encountered here...out of curiosity, where do you remember me from? :-) Cheers, Khoi khoi 04:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I am a student know goes to Krueger Middle School, and several students and I have been frustrated since we can't edit any artivles of Wikipedia, especially the article of our own school. I would like to ask if you can consider unblocking us.
I forgot the IP address of mys chool, ill post it here tommorow or Thursday.
Thanks, Gerbilfyed 4
of course I could, but the thing is completely unsourced? Is it OR? is it even true? Can we at least get the name? Is it notable? Let's answer these questions before putting in time. - crz crztalk 19:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Are you the one with the beard in a wind tunnel? -- Mcginnly | Natter 12:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Duh, no. DVD+ R/W 23:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
I left this for Giano the other day - I thought it might amuse you too.
Whilst trying to discover who Mereworth Castle had been sold to in 1930, I came across the obituary of a hapless Dominick Browne, 4th Baron Oranmore and Browne on the telegraphs website:-
"When his parents were involved in their accident at Southborough, Kent, in 1927 Dominick knew that peers were supposed to be buried in lead coffins. He therefore ordered one from a local undertaker, whose men managed to get it upstairs to receive the body. Unfortunately, they found it too heavy to carry downstairs and put it into a service lift; the ropes broke, sending the casket crashing through the basement. On the death of his mother two days later, the hearse with her coffin caught fire, and another vehicle had to be ordered."
Poor bastard.-- Mcginnly | Natter 12:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Though I'm usually more attracted to other styles, I've always had a weakness for that particular picture, for no particular reason. Good choice! Dina 15:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Would you mind having a read of Palais Strousberg it could do with a fresh pair of eyes. Many thanks. -- Mcginnly | Natter 23:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[3]: I'd presume a title page / frontispiece: in 1744, I don't think anyone did book covers this elaborate. - Jmabel | Talk 07:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm giving some thought to your suggestion regarding architectural history. It would certainly get around the 'writing the history of civilisation' problem that exists as it stands, we could then perhaps introduce the Timeline of European architecture, Timeline of North American architecture etc. although possibly just a Timeline of architecture (or similar titled article that just charts the 'key' developments) would be less fragmentory. I'm still concerned though that the encyclopedia really should have a brief overview of architecture through the ages...........We should moot the idea on the talk page, at the wikiproject and giano, ghirla, wetman etc. -- Mcginnly | Natter 13:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
PS: would you be interesting in commenting in the debate I'm having at Vault (architecture) - I'm trying to argue we'll get a better article by merging the forked stubs Lierne (vault), Cloister vault, Sexpartite vault etc.etc. Ultimately I see an overview article at Vault (architecture) and then probably 2 or 3 forks for Barrel vaults, Ribbed vaults and maybe "Other vaults". -- Mcginnly | Natter 13:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I never read Il sistema periodico; in fact, I believe the only Primo Levi I've read was a reprint or two in Granta or some such. Certainly a good start on a useful article.
Back for a moment on Vico: I'm guessing that the person who uploaded the image just didn't understand how books were manufactured in the mid-18th century. - Jmabel | Talk 19:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
p.s. I see you've been doing a lot of great work lately. - Jmabel | Talk 19:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
It's hiding here at the moment User:Dina/subpage. I'm going to go there on thursday, so I thought I'd wait until the muse hits to try to describe it. I'm not finding a lot of good online sources, though there's a book on buildings in boston that looks interesting enough to buy and read. Dina 02:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I hit 10,000 edits the other day and to commemorate this momentous (?) occasion, I wanted to leave a note to the various people I've run into on Wikipedia that have made an impact on my time here. Many times I've seen your name as the blocking admin for vandals I've reported. Just wanted to say thank you for all the work you do around here. =) --
Gogo Dodo 05:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you too Gogo Dodo!
DVD+
R/W
05:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() Archives |
---|
Thank you for watching my user page! It's remarkable what sorts of exchanges one gets with people who find their spam/vanity bios tagged for speedy deletion. In this instance of vandalism, I suspect it may be related to this exchange, which is probably amusing to read for the sheer indignation the poor guy exhibits... Best, Sandstein 21:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Love the idea. I've been thinking along similar lines regarding the wikiproject - but with a broader scope; I started the notice board a while ago, but it only me that seems to post anything to it. I was thinking about some kind of weekly newletter that we could transclude to project members - the trouble is I don't really have the time to devote to it - and yourself and dogears are in similar situations I presume. Maybe I'll post the suggestion to the notice board this week and see if anyone steps up. The idea would be to include everyone's work in progress, new articles, GA's, FA's current discussions, help wanted etc. etc. It might foster a sense of community and keep the left hand informed of the right hand's actions. Regards -- Mcginnly | Natter 23:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
PS. I sent you an email. -- Mcginnly | Natter 00:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorted -- Mcginnly | Natter 22:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
protecting my userpage. KOS | talk 20:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Nice work, and moral support! But off duty at the moment. Tyrenius 03:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I see that you are an administrator. I would like some feedback on the above article please. Although I have been reading up on policies, I would like to get the opinions of more experienced editors before I proceed. Thank you. Tidaress 03:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Wow, amazing, how on earth...? I love it! File:SoleteRayosÑajo.gif Bishonen | talk 17:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC).
Thanks for taming the runaway bot! -- Wetman 04:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! -- Srik e it ( Talk | Email) 20:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Caveat contributor: (Especially) among the upper echelons wikipedia works on the cult principles of control and domination: their control, your domination. To some (high positioned) Wikipedia is not a GAME but rather a RELIGION.-- 4.245.245.64 03:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for the encourgament! I have just completed a bio on Elia Zengelis and got a shock when it was immediately proposed by the 'delete police' that it should be removed, as he is not important enough, and that he could be simply included under OMA! I'm going to defend his inclusion in his own right! I agree that the Eisenman page is thin in comparision to his importance. I myself already added to it some references to interviews, but I'd be delighted to have a look at the theoretical issues - especailly as they have chnaged during his career - from structuralism to post-structuralism and psychoanalysis.-- TTKK 08:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok it's not in vegas but this would be an absolutely great example of a duck if ever we get to writing the article. -- Mcginnly | Natter 19:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Answered your post on User_talk:Dina#Stop_your_revert-vandalism -- 62.147.39.202 05:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism from breaking WP:REVERT, WP:MOSDAB, and acting disingenuously:
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
-- 62.147.86.249 08:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I've proposed a solution at User talk:Dina -- Dweller 10:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
GOOD NEWS - User:Dweller provided a brilliant solution (he created a stub with notability claim and will send it direct to AFD to test if article and dab link should stay), detailled at User_talk:Dina#Stop_your_revert-vandalism -- 62.147.86.249 11:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Dina 13:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, this image suffers from a lack of infos. It was migrated from en: to commons. You delete the old version. May you give me the original description text of this picutre to complete the current version on Commons ? Best regards Kelson 08:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
-- GeeJo (t)⁄ (c) • 08:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
User:24.147.162.153 continues to vandalize pages since his/her last block. Since you handled the last one, perhaps you can handle this one. Thank you. -- Jayron 32 17:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
He/She has repeatedly removed your vandalism warnings from the talk page connected to edits to the Dir en grey article. I've had to revert it twice and restore it once because it was undetected by a bot posting an image problem warning; and even that warning has been deleted at least once by this troll. Just a heads up... Ranma9617 21:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Another château. We haven't come near to presenting articles on just the best and most beautiful. French Wikipedia doesn't cover this jewel yet. I do hope you don't mind my tweaking your articles. -- Wetman 07:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Now that there's the three of us updating the Portal, you can use the "roster" link on that new Toolbar to see who's doing the rotation this week. — Dogears 01:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm confused; can you tell me what happened? Has the image been removed from the Commons? Tony 14:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I should have messaged you when I replaced the image. Thanks for your comments! Tony 04:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[1] A fairer member I cannot imagine. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you candidacy. -- Mcginnly | Natter 23:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
You're welcome, but it still seems kind of slim for such an important topic..maybe later this month I'll try and expand it...Novickas 15:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Yours flapped and moved. Did you not see that I shot the last animated bird someone put on my talk page? Thanks, I went with a more traditional bumpersticker but stole your text. KillerChihuahua ?!? 01:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Would you mind changing the style of your advertisement User:DVD R W/User Fo'Flo' so that it doesn't overwrite important information on the web pages it appears on? Also, that advertisement would be better placed on a user page rather than a user talk page. Talk pages are for discussion. — Psychonaut 10:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey! I remember you said on my 2nd RfA that I was one of the first users you encountered here...out of curiosity, where do you remember me from? :-) Cheers, Khoi khoi 04:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I am a student know goes to Krueger Middle School, and several students and I have been frustrated since we can't edit any artivles of Wikipedia, especially the article of our own school. I would like to ask if you can consider unblocking us.
I forgot the IP address of mys chool, ill post it here tommorow or Thursday.
Thanks, Gerbilfyed 4
of course I could, but the thing is completely unsourced? Is it OR? is it even true? Can we at least get the name? Is it notable? Let's answer these questions before putting in time. - crz crztalk 19:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Are you the one with the beard in a wind tunnel? -- Mcginnly | Natter 12:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Duh, no. DVD+ R/W 23:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
I left this for Giano the other day - I thought it might amuse you too.
Whilst trying to discover who Mereworth Castle had been sold to in 1930, I came across the obituary of a hapless Dominick Browne, 4th Baron Oranmore and Browne on the telegraphs website:-
"When his parents were involved in their accident at Southborough, Kent, in 1927 Dominick knew that peers were supposed to be buried in lead coffins. He therefore ordered one from a local undertaker, whose men managed to get it upstairs to receive the body. Unfortunately, they found it too heavy to carry downstairs and put it into a service lift; the ropes broke, sending the casket crashing through the basement. On the death of his mother two days later, the hearse with her coffin caught fire, and another vehicle had to be ordered."
Poor bastard.-- Mcginnly | Natter 12:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Though I'm usually more attracted to other styles, I've always had a weakness for that particular picture, for no particular reason. Good choice! Dina 15:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Would you mind having a read of Palais Strousberg it could do with a fresh pair of eyes. Many thanks. -- Mcginnly | Natter 23:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[3]: I'd presume a title page / frontispiece: in 1744, I don't think anyone did book covers this elaborate. - Jmabel | Talk 07:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm giving some thought to your suggestion regarding architectural history. It would certainly get around the 'writing the history of civilisation' problem that exists as it stands, we could then perhaps introduce the Timeline of European architecture, Timeline of North American architecture etc. although possibly just a Timeline of architecture (or similar titled article that just charts the 'key' developments) would be less fragmentory. I'm still concerned though that the encyclopedia really should have a brief overview of architecture through the ages...........We should moot the idea on the talk page, at the wikiproject and giano, ghirla, wetman etc. -- Mcginnly | Natter 13:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
PS: would you be interesting in commenting in the debate I'm having at Vault (architecture) - I'm trying to argue we'll get a better article by merging the forked stubs Lierne (vault), Cloister vault, Sexpartite vault etc.etc. Ultimately I see an overview article at Vault (architecture) and then probably 2 or 3 forks for Barrel vaults, Ribbed vaults and maybe "Other vaults". -- Mcginnly | Natter 13:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I never read Il sistema periodico; in fact, I believe the only Primo Levi I've read was a reprint or two in Granta or some such. Certainly a good start on a useful article.
Back for a moment on Vico: I'm guessing that the person who uploaded the image just didn't understand how books were manufactured in the mid-18th century. - Jmabel | Talk 19:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
p.s. I see you've been doing a lot of great work lately. - Jmabel | Talk 19:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
It's hiding here at the moment User:Dina/subpage. I'm going to go there on thursday, so I thought I'd wait until the muse hits to try to describe it. I'm not finding a lot of good online sources, though there's a book on buildings in boston that looks interesting enough to buy and read. Dina 02:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I hit 10,000 edits the other day and to commemorate this momentous (?) occasion, I wanted to leave a note to the various people I've run into on Wikipedia that have made an impact on my time here. Many times I've seen your name as the blocking admin for vandals I've reported. Just wanted to say thank you for all the work you do around here. =) --
Gogo Dodo 05:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you too Gogo Dodo!
DVD+
R/W
05:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)