This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | → | Archive 25 |
The reason I made that edit is because boxoffice grosses are usually in US dollars on the English Wikipedia. People are going to think those billion dollar grosses are in US dollars. By clarifying that its in rupees and adding US dollar conversions will give non-Indian readers a better understanding of the monetary values. Someone at my work was looking at the numbers and said "What. This movie grossed over $6.5 Billion at the boxoffice? That means its bigger than Avatar (2009 film) and Titanic (1997 film)". Umm no. So this makes it clearer for the non-Indian English reader. Giantdevilfish ( talk) 16:16, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Quite few times i had edited some few things (despite so called admin protection) on the page Bajrangi Bhaijaan. Heres the edits [4] and [5]. Adding wrong information of boxoffice and producers seems to be right? and if NO so the page should require pending change protection UNLESS AND UNTIL THE DATA USER SENDS SHOULD BE REVIEWED WITH A "VALID" SOURCE. Still it has been targeted by user (suspected as socks likely). SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 13:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Sir, as per policy We Are Not A Directory. Here there is a category Category:Unreleased Indian films where shelved films are categorized. We can make an exception for the films which are released in film festivals. But the films which are not releasing (in future too) does not need to have its own article else it must be created as draft. So may i keep the category for deletion or what exact action to be taken against this obsolete category? SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 13:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Cyphoidbomb whatever you have undone my update on saaho page is not correct. Please check the reference 1 which is mentioned in the page. The cast mentioned over there is for the film baahubali, not for saaho. That is what I removed in the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sridhar84 ( talk • contribs) 23:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
stop reverting constructive, and cited references of intellectual editors, and stop tagging them as block evasion which is not the case. They are contributing to wikipedia without disrupting its policies. Provide feedback to wikipedia on this unique behavior of padmalkshmisx which is actually helping wikipedia India related articles. Tell the arbitration committee about the failed Sockpuppet policy, which is neither helping wikipedia nor is a threat to editors. The sockpuppet system has failed. Paidiiijayraj ( talk) 10:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, The basic rule of only country name may not apply completely for Countries like India where it had more than four big movie Industries. I am not saying about just languages. Although these movie industries are based on Language they are still different from each other from where they are produced. All other movies which are made in single language are said by their industry name in South India except this movie. This would be biased and against Wikipedia policy I beileve. It would be better to add Industry base(Tollywood/Bollywood) independent of Language for India alone. The fact being here is the movie being telugu (even if its made in other language in parallel) is being supressed even if i am adding cited sources and again i beleivve its against neutral point of view as otehr movie pages in South india clearly mentions their industry name. agasthyathepirate (talk) 13:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Sir, please turn your kind attention to the above page. A user Rashqeqamar is repeatedly vandalizing the page and other related pages with his own POV. I have reverted this user for now but he is likely to vandalize the page again. Also this user threatens those users who happen to undo his edits. I don't know how to handle such users. Please help in maintaining the page as it is and protecting it from vandalism. You can warn this user far more efficiently. Vibhss ( talk) 13:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Note to Admins: The user referenced above (Rashkeqamar) has been engaged in good-hand/bad-hand editing including unambiguous vandalism. They've also made bizarre POV edits like unilaterally deciding to exclude dubbed films from worldwide gross figures. Given the shape of the user's edits, and the ubiquity of paid/unpaid sockpuppets who exist solely to fuck with Indian film financials, my instinct is to indef, since this sort of editing style tends to be persist even after blocks, wasting editor time. Of course, whatever you decide is fine by me.Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
What happen with the Great Father boxoffice collection? It was in the wikipedia website last week. Now, I dont see it. Someone changed it. please fix that. It got 50 cr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuliMurugan ( talk • contribs) 00:15, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the pieces of information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IMQFT ( talk • contribs) 05:07, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
I don't know why you are biased about Dangal collections. Dangal collected 72.68 crores in 3 days in China according to trade analyst Taran Adarsh. Dangal which was released in Taiwan in April 2017 collected 35 crores gross. Why is this biasness I don't understand. Why are you not adding the collections and showing less than actual. Saisiddharth4u ( talk) 15:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
I don't know why you are biased about Dangal collections. Dangal collected 72.68 crores in 3 days in China according to trade analyst Taran Adarsh. Dangal which was released in Taiwan in April 2017 collected 35 crores gross. Why is this biasness I don't understand. Why are you not adding the collections and showing less than actual. Saisiddharth4u ( talk) 15:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
As you can see List of most expensive Indian films movie has also a column which converts the budget to approx current budget. It's easy for any Wiki User to see and compare things between years. That's why that functionality has added to current conversion by year, it's not easy for a person to calculate by his own. I don't know how to use talk page and reply to the user so I modified here. Sanjan Kumar Patel 05:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjanind ( talk • contribs)
Hey, I just wanted to thank you for your post yesterday, and also invite you to continue contributing to the discussion if you'd like. There have been several editors now whom have continued readding the "new" title, despite that they have no source to back it up. I think what may be happening here is that people are simply presuming that because the article citing the release date change refers to the movie as "Scooby" (which is logical, as it's the name of the franchise), that the title has suddenly changed despite the article not mentioning any change in the title. I'm attempting to invite any editor who continues adding this unsourced content to discuss on the talk page, but it would be nice to have you as a second voice :) Cheers, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 16:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
You have said that the great father collection Source is fake.But in the Section of Mohanlal movies that Sources are used alSo all know that actor,producer and director has confirmed the news regarding SOcr. I will provide the Sources that are reliable
1.Onlookers Media - http://onlookersmedia.in/latestnews/great-father-enters-50-crore-club/
2.Manorama News - http://www.manoramanews.com/news/entertainment/2017/04/23/mammootty-move-to-50-crore-club.html
3.Mollywood Times - http://mollywoodtimes.com/2017/04/22/the-great-father-touches-the-50-crore-mark/
4.1ndian Movie Planet - http://indianmovieplanet.com/great father 50 crore club/
5.South Live - http://ml.southlive.in/movie/film-debate/baahubali-2-kerala-boxoffice
6.FilmFaktory - http://filmfaktoryoin/official great father touches 50 crore mark/
7.Muyals - http://muyalS.com/ml/201'7/04/22/9reat father 50 core club 2/
8.Review Rating - http://www.reviewrating.org/tag/the-great-father-movie/
10.Kerala BO Updates - http://www.kboupdates.com/2017/04/its-official-now-the-great-father-touches-50-crore-mark-from-world-wide-boxoffice/
11.Pycker - https://pycker.com/movies/my-dad-david/news
Sir these are the sources i provided more sources are available fron Asianet news , Kairali tv etc
muhammed.suhail ( talk) 14:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Due to your editorial involvement in {{
Disney's_Beauty_and_the_Beast}}
I thought you might want to participate in the RFC at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#RFC: Overhauling the Disney franchise templates for consistency.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
04:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Due to your editorial involvement in {{
Tarzan}}
I thought you might want to participate in the RFC at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#RFC: Overhauling the Disney franchise templates for consistency.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
04:43, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb ..Please clarify how sources like catch news is credible?? Who is actually running that page?? and nobody in Kerala knows about such a page like catch news. What is the criteria for including it in the reference?? One more question in Kerala normally producers reveal the collection and then only media reports the collection of a film as official collection. It is same in the case of recent big hits like Pulimurugan, Munthirivalli thalirkkumbol etc. Then why The Great Father is not included in the list even the most popular media in Kerala manoramanews reported it collected more than 50 crore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vathanlal ( talk • contribs) 11:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Below one is report from times of india,which is definitely a reliable source where it is mentioned that pazhassi has collected 49 crore and nothing mentioned like confirmed by producer in the article.If you are not able to update this,Please confirm the reason for this as well
http://m.timesofindia.com/others/news-interviews/Hariharan-MT-Vasudevan-prepare-for-Randamoozham/articleshow/9807050.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagar.kottappuram777 ( talk • contribs) 07:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Cyphoidbomb - I'm wondering if Bank Chor isn't a candidate for G11 - it's obviously promotion of a film that hasn't been produced. I saw where you added a redirect but we're getting heat over the NPR backlog. Your thoughts? Atsme 📞 📧 00:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb ..Please clarify the reason you removed great father from the list?The reasons you mentioned above for muhammed suhail's questions seems to be very funny.... 1. What source you want other than the one suhail listed above to include Great father in the list?
2.Why Mohanlal movies like Oppam,Munthirivallikal and pulimurugan has included in the list with the same source as he provided for Great father?If you remove Great father from the list,then the same is applicable for above Mohanlals movies as well.
3.Who is the user Jupitus Smart to decide the credibility?If he is a malayali,then definitely he will be the fan of mammootty or Mohanlal.SO how can you consider his confirmation as the source for editing wiki?Dude...many people are refering this and you should not loose your credibility by saying these kind of lame excuses.
So the case is simple.Either you include Great father also in the list with the sources provided by muhammed or you remove other movies from the lists those are referred by the same sources as used by Great father. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagar.kottappuram777 ( talk • contribs) 06:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb...I didnt tell that you removed the movie from list and i respect you.What I mentioned was,how can wiki take the opinion of a malayali admin for updating malayalam films as definitely that person will have special interest for a particular actor.Also the reason for removal is not convincing.Tell me one thing,if not producer,who will confirm the final collection?You mentioned that independent should confirm...which independent ?From where they get the details of collection?If I am not wrong they will get the collection from distributor/producer.Then what is the problem with statement "Producer confirm the collection".
Leave all this...if that is wikis rule,then fine enough.But why other movies like ezra,oppam,munthirivallikal doesnt have this rule applicable?How can u consider catchnews as relable source?I didnt see that in the reliable source list.Also for Oppam/munthirivallikal the news came is manorama after producer declared the figures.Even manorama also gets the details from producer/dostributor..I dont think they will go to each theaters and count money and confirm...
Another point i want to bring to your notice is Pazhassiraja's collection.Times of India mentioned that it collected 49 crore.But wiki is not updating that.I checked the talk page there and what I got the reason for the exclusion is,they are saying producer confirmed it has not collected that much.Here you are saying you wont take the words of producer and there it is exactly opposite..really feel pity on people trying hard to play against mammootty movie..
What we are expecting from a non malayali admin like you is before come to a conclusion check all the above points and take action accordingly without again asking the opinion of a malayali admin.If you really want to ask the opinion of that person,do it for other languages movies..not for malayalam...its a request
@Jupitus Smart...Are'nt you smart enough to understand that I am a mammootty fan?That doesnt mean that I am a lal hater.That is the reason why i opt the name of a lals character which i like...and its my choice ....now coming to our point...tell us clearly...which source you are expecting to put great father in the list?How can you confirm Oppam,MVT and Ezra with the sources like catch news.Also manorama took the collection after the producer confirmed the same.SO why you are not removing those movies from list?Not able to understand why this intolerance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagar.kottappuram777 ( talk • contribs) 05:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Can you please see if it passes WP:RS? The fact that it was founded by one of India's greatest journalists should help it I think. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 06:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I think I have found a reputable source that says this series premiered on YTV on January 9, 2010, not 2008 as it says in the infobox. Should we at least change that? https://twitter.com/ytv/status/7565766356 DeathTrain ( talk) 15:51, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
hey, u had better add this or change the protection level to semi protected so i could add. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Govindkrishna29 ( talk • contribs) 12:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the nonconstructive world-salad of a correction.
Had I realized the editing environment here was so toxic I wouldn't have attempted to contribute in the first place. Good luck with the dying charity, your time hasn't been wasted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.54.27 ( talk) 22:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
User called Kellymoat is reigniting the debate that the 2.0 film is the most expensive film in the whole of Asia and not just India, don't know if he's just patriotic, but he keeps denying the facts I place in front of him, and keeps undoing my changes. Might I suggest you talk to him and see if the film's page is OK generally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NutellaCambridge ( talk • contribs) 17:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
The page is draining me, can please check the films I brought up and make the necessary changes, I seem to putting water in an oil fire NutellaCambridge ( talk) 19:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Could you take another look at the Talk page for the film there is now a massive list of solid evidence against the claim, so if you deem it OK, could you make the neccesary changes (i.e. the most expensive film in India not Asia) NutellaCambridge ( talk) 09:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cb - regarding your notes on appeal #182183 ( this one), you haven't actually corresponded with the blocked user. First you have to click the "reserve" button then click the "Custom response - Awaiting user" template from the drop down menu and type your message in to the pop-up box. Their username as well as yours will autofill when you click "send email". -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:52, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Cyphoid, this user is continuously going on adding non-free album cover art of Baahubali 2 to all the franchise articles here. I would like a thorough last warning to be left. Can you take a look? — IB [ Poke ] 06:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi @ Cyphoidbomb:, this user Thapa 75 ( talk · contribs) has made some fundamental changes to the article (moved the article) from Mirabehn to Mira Behn based on a simple Google search (allegedly). But Britannica Encyclopedia claims her to be Mirabehn not Mira Behn. And the user has also included images that are in possible violation of copyrights to List of Baahubali characters. Sreeking ( talk) 14:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Please take a look at this IP, 116.72.74.105. The user is not here to contribute to the Wikipedia. A single purpose IP for deliberate malicious edits. -- 112.133.248.25 ( talk) 11:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I've temporarily reverted your redirect on notability grounds of MD Asif, as the article creator has just responded by creating a cut and paste fork at Md Asif, which I've tagged for speedy A10. If this goes to AFD, I'll support redirection on the grounds you gave in your edit summary. Thanks, Uncle Roy ( talk) 10:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Do you have the fortitude to take on the over-the-top promotion at Barun Sobti? I'm trying to catch up on my watchlist after being away for a few days and I don't have it in me to do what needs to be done there (which will require a sharp cutting implement to gut the worst of it).-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Could you take a look at RockabyeBaby444? Thanks. Sro23 ( talk) 16:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
You probably know what I'm talking about already. Over the last few days, an IP user has been reverted several times over on List of Bear in the Big Blue House episodes. The IPv6's there are now blocked by a rangeblock on 2604:6000:e589:a200::/64. An IPv4 also made the same edit as those IPv6's to the page after the IPv6's were blocked and before the page could be put under pending changes protection, so that's obvious block evasion there. (The IPv4 is 97.33.65.184 and has yet to be blocked at this time.) My question is if they are related to Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Muppets LTA. If so, do you want to add Bear in the Big Blue House to their interests? — Gestrid ( talk) 22:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Really is the film Tubelight (film) not fictional? How could you declare it as "real film"? Is it a biopic? or docudrama? or experimental film? Let me remind you sir Cyphoid that Inglorious Basterds was also set in Nazi era during WW2 so was it a biopic? The characters in the film were trying to avenge Hitler but according to his "biopic" he committed suicide. Strange that a backdrop of the film counted as historical film. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 14:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hii administrator I noticed a duplicate article of tv series chinnari pellikuthuru is telugu dubbed series Hindi serial balika vadhu so redirect it balika vadhu article.
Sri Harsha Malempati (
talk)
08:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Letting you know that a proposal has been made in a lower discussion on the talk page. 72.213.205.141 ( talk) 16:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Gone too soon... The consensus was that the site lacked notability (although I don't think that undermines its reliability). On the basis of this discussion, it is still a reliable sources in select cases. So do you think it should still be listed under "Sources generally considered reliable" at WP:ICTFFAQ? -- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb,I am respectable to you.. I kindly request you this that Ason27 is discouraging me in editing. He/she mostly like Revathi, Shriya and Simran.Some times he/she crossing the limits. You are not a motivator. he/she knowingly attacking of my edits (Not only Jyothika) Please do help me. Don't let him/her to follow my edits. GOOD morning ( talk) 21:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
They were the latest estimates. As for USD currency conversion I was not aware about it however it is very common among movies and would be a more convenient thing as more people are aware of USD value. I am absolutely guilty for not providing new citations I guess I should leave this to the more dedicated users. I don't quite understand talk pages so tell me if I did something wrong thanks. - dc ( talk) 15:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC) dc ( talk) 15:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Cyphoid Bomb! I request you to let me edit the article Naagin(TV series). I am willing to write the article in a perfect way. I edited it three times but after some time, it appears as it is before editing. Could you give me access to edit the article. You have been changing my edit every time on Naagin. I plead you to give me permussion to edit Naagin(TV series) article. If you could give me suggestions, please suggest me. Respond and reply soon. Pranay Star ( talk) 07:10, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Can you please take a look at Talk:Max Steel (film)#Edit war and voice your thoughts on the matter presented here? There was a disagreement between Deathawk and Koala15 about which version was being preferred months ago and no consensus was taking place despite adding my two cents on the issue. Now, the issue has been raised up again in the section break and we need to get a WP:CONSENSUS with the others at WT:FILM. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 23:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Recently I had edit plot story of tv series Naagin but you had removed it please help me to know my mistake Sri Harsha Malempati ( talk) 08:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hey...I would really appreciate if you can check this user (Reddyvi) as a suspect of Padmalakshmisx? It is currently active on C. Narayana Reddy page which is an ITN candidate here. - Vivvt ( Talk) 12:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Sir I wanted your help Sir in the article Qubool Hai's cast section there is this tag:
This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Cast sections are not typically broken down by seasons. See WP:TVCAST for guidance. Doing it this way results in needless repetition. Cast lists are typically organized into Main and Recurring sections. The Main cast section is ordered by series credits, and new characters in both sections are added to the bottoms of each section. Lists should include brief descriptions of the characters, as well as real-world content about casting, circumstances surrounding departures, etc. If there are changes in a cast member's prominence across multiple seasons, cast tables can be used in conjunction with the prose information, but they should not replace encyclopedic prose. See List of Millennium characters as an example of the goal. Please help improve this section if you can. |
So sir in this case to remove this tag can I add cast table in the cast section of the article or I should compulsorily create a new article as List Of Qubool Hai Characters plz clear my doubt. Regards, YAP123456 ( talk) 06:15, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Give me permission to edit naagin(tv series) page. How many maximum characters should we write in the plot section. I don't edit cast only I will edit plot and info section by following wikipedia rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pranay Star ( talk • contribs) 06:12, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
How do I deal with someone just reverting my changes. Esp with Marykom the film, someone called Krish has been reverting the factual errors sections. Iprathik ( talk) 03:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
The section I had added had no rumour in it. The actor did hint at joining politics and that was what was added. I have added no personal speculation or opinion, just mere facts. Please reply here on my talk page.
Adwaith s ( talk) 16:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
This IP is back at it again. Similar edits, clearly the same individual. Please block (if another admin doesn't get to it before you, as they were also reported to WP:AIV). Thanks. 2A00:1838:37:C1:0:0:0:6A9D ( talk) 04:00, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure what this user is up to, but they can't be up to any good here, making recent edits such as this (among others, too). Seeing that you've blocked them three times already, you may be more familiar with their behavior then other admins, so would you mind looking into this? Thank you. 124.199.193.86 ( talk) 04:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
If we can create article on dubbed tv shows of different names in different language if it even original tv series article is existing Eg:- in India many Hindi tv series had dubbed into other Indian languages Sri Harsha Malempati ( talk) 02:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
I smell something fishy. So, I was looking for some advice/insight on how to proceed. I would like to get to the bottom of a situation, what I believe to be 25 possible sockpuppets (ballot stuffing, strawmen, and meatpuppets), both from named accounts and ip addresses. Fifteen of them have already been blocked, some for vandalism, and some for being socks. While others have been investigated and not blocked. And a few names that have not been accused (to my knowledge) of anything but still put off that uncomfortable vibe of suspicion.
I mean, the last thing I want to do is go around accusing people a second time, nor would I want to ask admin to investigate people already blocked. But, my theory is, that with every new confirmation/block, it could lead back to one of the ones that were not blocked.
Any ideas? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kellymoat ( talk • contribs) 18:21, June 18, 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | → | Archive 25 |
The reason I made that edit is because boxoffice grosses are usually in US dollars on the English Wikipedia. People are going to think those billion dollar grosses are in US dollars. By clarifying that its in rupees and adding US dollar conversions will give non-Indian readers a better understanding of the monetary values. Someone at my work was looking at the numbers and said "What. This movie grossed over $6.5 Billion at the boxoffice? That means its bigger than Avatar (2009 film) and Titanic (1997 film)". Umm no. So this makes it clearer for the non-Indian English reader. Giantdevilfish ( talk) 16:16, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Quite few times i had edited some few things (despite so called admin protection) on the page Bajrangi Bhaijaan. Heres the edits [4] and [5]. Adding wrong information of boxoffice and producers seems to be right? and if NO so the page should require pending change protection UNLESS AND UNTIL THE DATA USER SENDS SHOULD BE REVIEWED WITH A "VALID" SOURCE. Still it has been targeted by user (suspected as socks likely). SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 13:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Sir, as per policy We Are Not A Directory. Here there is a category Category:Unreleased Indian films where shelved films are categorized. We can make an exception for the films which are released in film festivals. But the films which are not releasing (in future too) does not need to have its own article else it must be created as draft. So may i keep the category for deletion or what exact action to be taken against this obsolete category? SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 13:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Cyphoidbomb whatever you have undone my update on saaho page is not correct. Please check the reference 1 which is mentioned in the page. The cast mentioned over there is for the film baahubali, not for saaho. That is what I removed in the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sridhar84 ( talk • contribs) 23:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
stop reverting constructive, and cited references of intellectual editors, and stop tagging them as block evasion which is not the case. They are contributing to wikipedia without disrupting its policies. Provide feedback to wikipedia on this unique behavior of padmalkshmisx which is actually helping wikipedia India related articles. Tell the arbitration committee about the failed Sockpuppet policy, which is neither helping wikipedia nor is a threat to editors. The sockpuppet system has failed. Paidiiijayraj ( talk) 10:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, The basic rule of only country name may not apply completely for Countries like India where it had more than four big movie Industries. I am not saying about just languages. Although these movie industries are based on Language they are still different from each other from where they are produced. All other movies which are made in single language are said by their industry name in South India except this movie. This would be biased and against Wikipedia policy I beileve. It would be better to add Industry base(Tollywood/Bollywood) independent of Language for India alone. The fact being here is the movie being telugu (even if its made in other language in parallel) is being supressed even if i am adding cited sources and again i beleivve its against neutral point of view as otehr movie pages in South india clearly mentions their industry name. agasthyathepirate (talk) 13:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Sir, please turn your kind attention to the above page. A user Rashqeqamar is repeatedly vandalizing the page and other related pages with his own POV. I have reverted this user for now but he is likely to vandalize the page again. Also this user threatens those users who happen to undo his edits. I don't know how to handle such users. Please help in maintaining the page as it is and protecting it from vandalism. You can warn this user far more efficiently. Vibhss ( talk) 13:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Note to Admins: The user referenced above (Rashkeqamar) has been engaged in good-hand/bad-hand editing including unambiguous vandalism. They've also made bizarre POV edits like unilaterally deciding to exclude dubbed films from worldwide gross figures. Given the shape of the user's edits, and the ubiquity of paid/unpaid sockpuppets who exist solely to fuck with Indian film financials, my instinct is to indef, since this sort of editing style tends to be persist even after blocks, wasting editor time. Of course, whatever you decide is fine by me.Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
What happen with the Great Father boxoffice collection? It was in the wikipedia website last week. Now, I dont see it. Someone changed it. please fix that. It got 50 cr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuliMurugan ( talk • contribs) 00:15, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the pieces of information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IMQFT ( talk • contribs) 05:07, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
I don't know why you are biased about Dangal collections. Dangal collected 72.68 crores in 3 days in China according to trade analyst Taran Adarsh. Dangal which was released in Taiwan in April 2017 collected 35 crores gross. Why is this biasness I don't understand. Why are you not adding the collections and showing less than actual. Saisiddharth4u ( talk) 15:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
I don't know why you are biased about Dangal collections. Dangal collected 72.68 crores in 3 days in China according to trade analyst Taran Adarsh. Dangal which was released in Taiwan in April 2017 collected 35 crores gross. Why is this biasness I don't understand. Why are you not adding the collections and showing less than actual. Saisiddharth4u ( talk) 15:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
As you can see List of most expensive Indian films movie has also a column which converts the budget to approx current budget. It's easy for any Wiki User to see and compare things between years. That's why that functionality has added to current conversion by year, it's not easy for a person to calculate by his own. I don't know how to use talk page and reply to the user so I modified here. Sanjan Kumar Patel 05:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjanind ( talk • contribs)
Hey, I just wanted to thank you for your post yesterday, and also invite you to continue contributing to the discussion if you'd like. There have been several editors now whom have continued readding the "new" title, despite that they have no source to back it up. I think what may be happening here is that people are simply presuming that because the article citing the release date change refers to the movie as "Scooby" (which is logical, as it's the name of the franchise), that the title has suddenly changed despite the article not mentioning any change in the title. I'm attempting to invite any editor who continues adding this unsourced content to discuss on the talk page, but it would be nice to have you as a second voice :) Cheers, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 16:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
You have said that the great father collection Source is fake.But in the Section of Mohanlal movies that Sources are used alSo all know that actor,producer and director has confirmed the news regarding SOcr. I will provide the Sources that are reliable
1.Onlookers Media - http://onlookersmedia.in/latestnews/great-father-enters-50-crore-club/
2.Manorama News - http://www.manoramanews.com/news/entertainment/2017/04/23/mammootty-move-to-50-crore-club.html
3.Mollywood Times - http://mollywoodtimes.com/2017/04/22/the-great-father-touches-the-50-crore-mark/
4.1ndian Movie Planet - http://indianmovieplanet.com/great father 50 crore club/
5.South Live - http://ml.southlive.in/movie/film-debate/baahubali-2-kerala-boxoffice
6.FilmFaktory - http://filmfaktoryoin/official great father touches 50 crore mark/
7.Muyals - http://muyalS.com/ml/201'7/04/22/9reat father 50 core club 2/
8.Review Rating - http://www.reviewrating.org/tag/the-great-father-movie/
10.Kerala BO Updates - http://www.kboupdates.com/2017/04/its-official-now-the-great-father-touches-50-crore-mark-from-world-wide-boxoffice/
11.Pycker - https://pycker.com/movies/my-dad-david/news
Sir these are the sources i provided more sources are available fron Asianet news , Kairali tv etc
muhammed.suhail ( talk) 14:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Due to your editorial involvement in {{
Disney's_Beauty_and_the_Beast}}
I thought you might want to participate in the RFC at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#RFC: Overhauling the Disney franchise templates for consistency.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
04:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Due to your editorial involvement in {{
Tarzan}}
I thought you might want to participate in the RFC at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#RFC: Overhauling the Disney franchise templates for consistency.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
04:43, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb ..Please clarify how sources like catch news is credible?? Who is actually running that page?? and nobody in Kerala knows about such a page like catch news. What is the criteria for including it in the reference?? One more question in Kerala normally producers reveal the collection and then only media reports the collection of a film as official collection. It is same in the case of recent big hits like Pulimurugan, Munthirivalli thalirkkumbol etc. Then why The Great Father is not included in the list even the most popular media in Kerala manoramanews reported it collected more than 50 crore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vathanlal ( talk • contribs) 11:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Below one is report from times of india,which is definitely a reliable source where it is mentioned that pazhassi has collected 49 crore and nothing mentioned like confirmed by producer in the article.If you are not able to update this,Please confirm the reason for this as well
http://m.timesofindia.com/others/news-interviews/Hariharan-MT-Vasudevan-prepare-for-Randamoozham/articleshow/9807050.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagar.kottappuram777 ( talk • contribs) 07:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Cyphoidbomb - I'm wondering if Bank Chor isn't a candidate for G11 - it's obviously promotion of a film that hasn't been produced. I saw where you added a redirect but we're getting heat over the NPR backlog. Your thoughts? Atsme 📞 📧 00:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb ..Please clarify the reason you removed great father from the list?The reasons you mentioned above for muhammed suhail's questions seems to be very funny.... 1. What source you want other than the one suhail listed above to include Great father in the list?
2.Why Mohanlal movies like Oppam,Munthirivallikal and pulimurugan has included in the list with the same source as he provided for Great father?If you remove Great father from the list,then the same is applicable for above Mohanlals movies as well.
3.Who is the user Jupitus Smart to decide the credibility?If he is a malayali,then definitely he will be the fan of mammootty or Mohanlal.SO how can you consider his confirmation as the source for editing wiki?Dude...many people are refering this and you should not loose your credibility by saying these kind of lame excuses.
So the case is simple.Either you include Great father also in the list with the sources provided by muhammed or you remove other movies from the lists those are referred by the same sources as used by Great father. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagar.kottappuram777 ( talk • contribs) 06:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb...I didnt tell that you removed the movie from list and i respect you.What I mentioned was,how can wiki take the opinion of a malayali admin for updating malayalam films as definitely that person will have special interest for a particular actor.Also the reason for removal is not convincing.Tell me one thing,if not producer,who will confirm the final collection?You mentioned that independent should confirm...which independent ?From where they get the details of collection?If I am not wrong they will get the collection from distributor/producer.Then what is the problem with statement "Producer confirm the collection".
Leave all this...if that is wikis rule,then fine enough.But why other movies like ezra,oppam,munthirivallikal doesnt have this rule applicable?How can u consider catchnews as relable source?I didnt see that in the reliable source list.Also for Oppam/munthirivallikal the news came is manorama after producer declared the figures.Even manorama also gets the details from producer/dostributor..I dont think they will go to each theaters and count money and confirm...
Another point i want to bring to your notice is Pazhassiraja's collection.Times of India mentioned that it collected 49 crore.But wiki is not updating that.I checked the talk page there and what I got the reason for the exclusion is,they are saying producer confirmed it has not collected that much.Here you are saying you wont take the words of producer and there it is exactly opposite..really feel pity on people trying hard to play against mammootty movie..
What we are expecting from a non malayali admin like you is before come to a conclusion check all the above points and take action accordingly without again asking the opinion of a malayali admin.If you really want to ask the opinion of that person,do it for other languages movies..not for malayalam...its a request
@Jupitus Smart...Are'nt you smart enough to understand that I am a mammootty fan?That doesnt mean that I am a lal hater.That is the reason why i opt the name of a lals character which i like...and its my choice ....now coming to our point...tell us clearly...which source you are expecting to put great father in the list?How can you confirm Oppam,MVT and Ezra with the sources like catch news.Also manorama took the collection after the producer confirmed the same.SO why you are not removing those movies from list?Not able to understand why this intolerance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagar.kottappuram777 ( talk • contribs) 05:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Can you please see if it passes WP:RS? The fact that it was founded by one of India's greatest journalists should help it I think. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 06:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I think I have found a reputable source that says this series premiered on YTV on January 9, 2010, not 2008 as it says in the infobox. Should we at least change that? https://twitter.com/ytv/status/7565766356 DeathTrain ( talk) 15:51, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
hey, u had better add this or change the protection level to semi protected so i could add. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Govindkrishna29 ( talk • contribs) 12:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the nonconstructive world-salad of a correction.
Had I realized the editing environment here was so toxic I wouldn't have attempted to contribute in the first place. Good luck with the dying charity, your time hasn't been wasted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.54.27 ( talk) 22:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
User called Kellymoat is reigniting the debate that the 2.0 film is the most expensive film in the whole of Asia and not just India, don't know if he's just patriotic, but he keeps denying the facts I place in front of him, and keeps undoing my changes. Might I suggest you talk to him and see if the film's page is OK generally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NutellaCambridge ( talk • contribs) 17:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
The page is draining me, can please check the films I brought up and make the necessary changes, I seem to putting water in an oil fire NutellaCambridge ( talk) 19:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Could you take another look at the Talk page for the film there is now a massive list of solid evidence against the claim, so if you deem it OK, could you make the neccesary changes (i.e. the most expensive film in India not Asia) NutellaCambridge ( talk) 09:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cb - regarding your notes on appeal #182183 ( this one), you haven't actually corresponded with the blocked user. First you have to click the "reserve" button then click the "Custom response - Awaiting user" template from the drop down menu and type your message in to the pop-up box. Their username as well as yours will autofill when you click "send email". -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:52, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Cyphoid, this user is continuously going on adding non-free album cover art of Baahubali 2 to all the franchise articles here. I would like a thorough last warning to be left. Can you take a look? — IB [ Poke ] 06:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi @ Cyphoidbomb:, this user Thapa 75 ( talk · contribs) has made some fundamental changes to the article (moved the article) from Mirabehn to Mira Behn based on a simple Google search (allegedly). But Britannica Encyclopedia claims her to be Mirabehn not Mira Behn. And the user has also included images that are in possible violation of copyrights to List of Baahubali characters. Sreeking ( talk) 14:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Please take a look at this IP, 116.72.74.105. The user is not here to contribute to the Wikipedia. A single purpose IP for deliberate malicious edits. -- 112.133.248.25 ( talk) 11:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I've temporarily reverted your redirect on notability grounds of MD Asif, as the article creator has just responded by creating a cut and paste fork at Md Asif, which I've tagged for speedy A10. If this goes to AFD, I'll support redirection on the grounds you gave in your edit summary. Thanks, Uncle Roy ( talk) 10:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Do you have the fortitude to take on the over-the-top promotion at Barun Sobti? I'm trying to catch up on my watchlist after being away for a few days and I don't have it in me to do what needs to be done there (which will require a sharp cutting implement to gut the worst of it).-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Could you take a look at RockabyeBaby444? Thanks. Sro23 ( talk) 16:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
You probably know what I'm talking about already. Over the last few days, an IP user has been reverted several times over on List of Bear in the Big Blue House episodes. The IPv6's there are now blocked by a rangeblock on 2604:6000:e589:a200::/64. An IPv4 also made the same edit as those IPv6's to the page after the IPv6's were blocked and before the page could be put under pending changes protection, so that's obvious block evasion there. (The IPv4 is 97.33.65.184 and has yet to be blocked at this time.) My question is if they are related to Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Muppets LTA. If so, do you want to add Bear in the Big Blue House to their interests? — Gestrid ( talk) 22:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Really is the film Tubelight (film) not fictional? How could you declare it as "real film"? Is it a biopic? or docudrama? or experimental film? Let me remind you sir Cyphoid that Inglorious Basterds was also set in Nazi era during WW2 so was it a biopic? The characters in the film were trying to avenge Hitler but according to his "biopic" he committed suicide. Strange that a backdrop of the film counted as historical film. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 14:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hii administrator I noticed a duplicate article of tv series chinnari pellikuthuru is telugu dubbed series Hindi serial balika vadhu so redirect it balika vadhu article.
Sri Harsha Malempati (
talk)
08:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Letting you know that a proposal has been made in a lower discussion on the talk page. 72.213.205.141 ( talk) 16:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Gone too soon... The consensus was that the site lacked notability (although I don't think that undermines its reliability). On the basis of this discussion, it is still a reliable sources in select cases. So do you think it should still be listed under "Sources generally considered reliable" at WP:ICTFFAQ? -- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb,I am respectable to you.. I kindly request you this that Ason27 is discouraging me in editing. He/she mostly like Revathi, Shriya and Simran.Some times he/she crossing the limits. You are not a motivator. he/she knowingly attacking of my edits (Not only Jyothika) Please do help me. Don't let him/her to follow my edits. GOOD morning ( talk) 21:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
They were the latest estimates. As for USD currency conversion I was not aware about it however it is very common among movies and would be a more convenient thing as more people are aware of USD value. I am absolutely guilty for not providing new citations I guess I should leave this to the more dedicated users. I don't quite understand talk pages so tell me if I did something wrong thanks. - dc ( talk) 15:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC) dc ( talk) 15:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Cyphoid Bomb! I request you to let me edit the article Naagin(TV series). I am willing to write the article in a perfect way. I edited it three times but after some time, it appears as it is before editing. Could you give me access to edit the article. You have been changing my edit every time on Naagin. I plead you to give me permussion to edit Naagin(TV series) article. If you could give me suggestions, please suggest me. Respond and reply soon. Pranay Star ( talk) 07:10, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Can you please take a look at Talk:Max Steel (film)#Edit war and voice your thoughts on the matter presented here? There was a disagreement between Deathawk and Koala15 about which version was being preferred months ago and no consensus was taking place despite adding my two cents on the issue. Now, the issue has been raised up again in the section break and we need to get a WP:CONSENSUS with the others at WT:FILM. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 23:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Recently I had edit plot story of tv series Naagin but you had removed it please help me to know my mistake Sri Harsha Malempati ( talk) 08:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hey...I would really appreciate if you can check this user (Reddyvi) as a suspect of Padmalakshmisx? It is currently active on C. Narayana Reddy page which is an ITN candidate here. - Vivvt ( Talk) 12:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Sir I wanted your help Sir in the article Qubool Hai's cast section there is this tag:
This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Cast sections are not typically broken down by seasons. See WP:TVCAST for guidance. Doing it this way results in needless repetition. Cast lists are typically organized into Main and Recurring sections. The Main cast section is ordered by series credits, and new characters in both sections are added to the bottoms of each section. Lists should include brief descriptions of the characters, as well as real-world content about casting, circumstances surrounding departures, etc. If there are changes in a cast member's prominence across multiple seasons, cast tables can be used in conjunction with the prose information, but they should not replace encyclopedic prose. See List of Millennium characters as an example of the goal. Please help improve this section if you can. |
So sir in this case to remove this tag can I add cast table in the cast section of the article or I should compulsorily create a new article as List Of Qubool Hai Characters plz clear my doubt. Regards, YAP123456 ( talk) 06:15, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Give me permission to edit naagin(tv series) page. How many maximum characters should we write in the plot section. I don't edit cast only I will edit plot and info section by following wikipedia rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pranay Star ( talk • contribs) 06:12, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
How do I deal with someone just reverting my changes. Esp with Marykom the film, someone called Krish has been reverting the factual errors sections. Iprathik ( talk) 03:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
The section I had added had no rumour in it. The actor did hint at joining politics and that was what was added. I have added no personal speculation or opinion, just mere facts. Please reply here on my talk page.
Adwaith s ( talk) 16:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
This IP is back at it again. Similar edits, clearly the same individual. Please block (if another admin doesn't get to it before you, as they were also reported to WP:AIV). Thanks. 2A00:1838:37:C1:0:0:0:6A9D ( talk) 04:00, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure what this user is up to, but they can't be up to any good here, making recent edits such as this (among others, too). Seeing that you've blocked them three times already, you may be more familiar with their behavior then other admins, so would you mind looking into this? Thank you. 124.199.193.86 ( talk) 04:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
If we can create article on dubbed tv shows of different names in different language if it even original tv series article is existing Eg:- in India many Hindi tv series had dubbed into other Indian languages Sri Harsha Malempati ( talk) 02:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
I smell something fishy. So, I was looking for some advice/insight on how to proceed. I would like to get to the bottom of a situation, what I believe to be 25 possible sockpuppets (ballot stuffing, strawmen, and meatpuppets), both from named accounts and ip addresses. Fifteen of them have already been blocked, some for vandalism, and some for being socks. While others have been investigated and not blocked. And a few names that have not been accused (to my knowledge) of anything but still put off that uncomfortable vibe of suspicion.
I mean, the last thing I want to do is go around accusing people a second time, nor would I want to ask admin to investigate people already blocked. But, my theory is, that with every new confirmation/block, it could lead back to one of the ones that were not blocked.
Any ideas? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kellymoat ( talk • contribs) 18:21, June 18, 2017 (UTC)