A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Fuel Injection, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
Hi Cuddlyable3, I'm Ryan - I see you have agreed to me mediating the above dispute in part. It's probably best if the same person mediates the full dispute, it keeps the process much simpler I am sure you will agree. Anyway, I'm interested to hear your thoughts on how you'd like to proceed, if your not happy with me mediating the copyright implications part of the dispute, then we can find other users to mediate the dispute - the most important thing is that all parties are happy with the mediator of the dispute. Regards, Ryan Postlethwaite 17:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Below are my thoughts about the first issue:
Hi cuddlyable3, I've removed some text from the mediation page that you added as we haven't started the mediation yet. So you've got a copy of it, I've put the text in the above link in your sandbox. Before we get stuck in to the mediation, we need to decide the issues to be mediated by me. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
In general, talk page comments of other people should not be removed which is why I reverted it. JoshuaZ 19:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
However the latest comments by Greglocock that I removed are IMO vandalism because they comprise:
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Talk:Fuel_injection, you will be
blocked from editing.
WikipedianProlific
(Talk)
11:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
[1]
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:Illegal prime. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.--
Hu12
19:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
If you continue to refactor talk pages other than your own user talk page, I will block you. The comments you have removed are personal attacks only in the most torturously extended sense. For example, you brought up the subject of "competitive urination," Scheinwerfermann merely responded in kind. This looks like light-hearted bantering to me, and if you have a problem here I suggest that it is your difficulty rather than others. I will of course be willing to evaluate additional examples should you have any, but so far nothing justifies removal and edit warring over these comments. Thatcher131 19:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Blocked: 8 hours for edit warring on Talk:Fuel injection after multiple warnings. Thatcher131 21:16, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Fuel Injection, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
Hi Cuddlyable3, I'm Ryan - I see you have agreed to me mediating the above dispute in part. It's probably best if the same person mediates the full dispute, it keeps the process much simpler I am sure you will agree. Anyway, I'm interested to hear your thoughts on how you'd like to proceed, if your not happy with me mediating the copyright implications part of the dispute, then we can find other users to mediate the dispute - the most important thing is that all parties are happy with the mediator of the dispute. Regards, Ryan Postlethwaite 17:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Below are my thoughts about the first issue:
Hi cuddlyable3, I've removed some text from the mediation page that you added as we haven't started the mediation yet. So you've got a copy of it, I've put the text in the above link in your sandbox. Before we get stuck in to the mediation, we need to decide the issues to be mediated by me. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
In general, talk page comments of other people should not be removed which is why I reverted it. JoshuaZ 19:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
However the latest comments by Greglocock that I removed are IMO vandalism because they comprise:
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Talk:Fuel_injection, you will be
blocked from editing.
WikipedianProlific
(Talk)
11:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
[1]
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:Illegal prime. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.--
Hu12
19:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
If you continue to refactor talk pages other than your own user talk page, I will block you. The comments you have removed are personal attacks only in the most torturously extended sense. For example, you brought up the subject of "competitive urination," Scheinwerfermann merely responded in kind. This looks like light-hearted bantering to me, and if you have a problem here I suggest that it is your difficulty rather than others. I will of course be willing to evaluate additional examples should you have any, but so far nothing justifies removal and edit warring over these comments. Thatcher131 19:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Blocked: 8 hours for edit warring on Talk:Fuel injection after multiple warnings. Thatcher131 21:16, 21 August 2007 (UTC)