unblock | reason=no idea why it has been blocked. I am a new user. Initially I made multiple edits so I was temporarily blocked. That was ok but now permanently blocked for absolutely no reason, I dont know why panic action. All content was properly put
I am unable to edit .
All content entered was with reference.
If it is being interpreted as not legit then there is some mis understanding
unblock | reason=no idea why it has been blocked. I am a new user. Initially I made multiple edits so I was temporarily blocked. That was ok but now permanently blocked for absolutely no reason, I dont know why panic action. All content was properly put
Hello, Correction With Evidence, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kavi Kalash did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. regentspark ( comment) 13:24, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add
defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to
Kavi Kalash, especially if it involves
living persons. Thank you.
Gotitbro (
talk)
09:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Declaration
1) this content is not related to living person. 2) it is not defamatory 3) information is authentic based on proofs and evidences . references are added Correction With Evidence ( talk) 16:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Kavi Kalash; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- regentspark ( comment) 01:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Maratha clan system; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.--
HinduKshatrana (
talk)
09:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Correction_With_Evidence reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
17:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 00:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Correction With Evidence ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #27490 was submitted on Nov 06, 2019 10:44:25. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 10:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Correction With Evidence". The reason given for Correction With Evidence's block is: "Edit warring: at Maratha clan system per a complaint at WP:AN3".
Decline reason: You are blocked directly; if you are seeing an autoblock message it means that you are trying to evade your block. I've also blocked your sock account. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Correction With Evidence
Welcome to Wikipedia!
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Gujrat/Maharashtra/Tamil Nadu/Karnataka/Madhya Pradesh, for deletion because it seems to be incoherent gibberish. If you want to practice editing-skills, please use the sandbox.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Lefcentreright Talk (plz ping) 12:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on RajeShirke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 💵Money💵emoji💵 Talk💸 Help out at CCI! 12:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Someone is discouraging me from edit Assure you that all content was put on web with relevance Correction With Evidence ( talk) 13:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
unblock | reason=new user. I am unable to edit as edits or any contests are permanently blocked. I am a new user Correction With Evidence ( talk) 14:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Correction With Evidence ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
What to do if I suspect some admin blocks the account purposefully
Decline reason:
Stop abusing the {{
unblock template}}
. Your block has already expired.
Yunshui
雲
水
15:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am still unable to edit, my account still blocked. How to proceed and where to go.
I am discouraged to use unblock feature as it will be treated as another type of abuse Correction With Evidence ( talk) 16:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
unblock | reason=no idea why it has been blocked. I am a new user. Initially I made multiple edits so I was temporarily blocked. That was ok but now permanently blocked for absolutely no reason, I dont know why panic action. All content was properly put
I am unable to edit .
All content entered was with reference.
If it is being interpreted as not legit then there is some mis understanding
unblock | reason=no idea why it has been blocked. I am a new user. Initially I made multiple edits so I was temporarily blocked. That was ok but now permanently blocked for absolutely no reason, I dont know why panic action. All content was properly put
Hello, Correction With Evidence, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kavi Kalash did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. regentspark ( comment) 13:24, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add
defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to
Kavi Kalash, especially if it involves
living persons. Thank you.
Gotitbro (
talk)
09:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Declaration
1) this content is not related to living person. 2) it is not defamatory 3) information is authentic based on proofs and evidences . references are added Correction With Evidence ( talk) 16:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Kavi Kalash; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- regentspark ( comment) 01:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Maratha clan system; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.--
HinduKshatrana (
talk)
09:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Correction_With_Evidence reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
17:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 00:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Correction With Evidence ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #27490 was submitted on Nov 06, 2019 10:44:25. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 10:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Correction With Evidence". The reason given for Correction With Evidence's block is: "Edit warring: at Maratha clan system per a complaint at WP:AN3".
Decline reason: You are blocked directly; if you are seeing an autoblock message it means that you are trying to evade your block. I've also blocked your sock account. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Correction With Evidence
Welcome to Wikipedia!
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Gujrat/Maharashtra/Tamil Nadu/Karnataka/Madhya Pradesh, for deletion because it seems to be incoherent gibberish. If you want to practice editing-skills, please use the sandbox.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Lefcentreright Talk (plz ping) 12:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on RajeShirke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 💵Money💵emoji💵 Talk💸 Help out at CCI! 12:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Someone is discouraging me from edit Assure you that all content was put on web with relevance Correction With Evidence ( talk) 13:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
unblock | reason=new user. I am unable to edit as edits or any contests are permanently blocked. I am a new user Correction With Evidence ( talk) 14:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Correction With Evidence ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
What to do if I suspect some admin blocks the account purposefully
Decline reason:
Stop abusing the {{
unblock template}}
. Your block has already expired.
Yunshui
雲
水
15:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am still unable to edit, my account still blocked. How to proceed and where to go.
I am discouraged to use unblock feature as it will be treated as another type of abuse Correction With Evidence ( talk) 16:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)