Why did you replace SESM by Renk? The powerpack is 100% a French development from SESM which is a subsidiary of Renk. But there is not any Renk Techonology in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.6.64.10 ( talk) 06:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Why is the resolution so low on this image? Geni 22:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for contributing the MiG-29 article. The MiG-29K its an interesting edit. However, can you give a reason why you tailored all the description for the model from A - SM? I have to revert it until you came up with something to replace the deleted information. Regards, ChowHui ( talk) 16:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the info. Where did you get it from? Are you sure about it??? The structure you present is completely different from the structure I found on the homepage of the various Polish military units. Also this is a massive reduction in units - are you sure? See, if you are sure about your changes it is fine for me, but I ask because I want to be sure, that we upload a more correct version afterwards. greetings, -- noclador ( talk) 16:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
I have begun to update the article about the Polish Land Forces. First I redesigned the graphic for the 11th Armoured Cavalry Division next up the 16th Mechanized Division. As you can see I took the information from the official homepage of the 11th Armoured Cavalry Division: http://www.11ldkpanc.mil.pl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=69&Itemid=76 Over the next 2 weeks I will update all the graphics about the Polish Land Forces and in the end put them together to create a full graphic. -- noclador ( talk) 00:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello and welcome Corran.pl! Thank you for your contributions related to
Poland. You may be interested in visiting
Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board,
joining our discussions and
sharing your creations with our community. |
-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Please consider entering them at T:TDYK and WP:MILCON.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Witam.
Przejdę od razu do rzeczy. Chciałbym się zapytać dlaczego notorycznie manipulujesz informacjami w artykule o czołgu podstawowym PT-91. Jak się już pewnie domyśliłeś z tytułu tej wiadomości chodzi mi o ilość czołgów podstawowych PT-91 i T-72M1Z. Sytuacja ta jest dosyć specyficzna ponieważ jak udało mi się dowiedzieć jesteś bardzo dobrze obeznany z tematem militariów. Nie rozumiem więc dlaczego manipulujesz w ten sposób informacjami i jedyny wniosek do jakiego można w tej chwili dojść jest następujący: Manipulujesz te informacje by "pokazać Wojsko Polskie z lepszej strony". Podejrzewam, że zaraz iż w Wojsku Polskim T-72M1Z są traktowane tak samo jak PT-91 oraz że są one praktycznie identyczne i w ten sposób stwierdzisz iż nic wielkiego się nie stało. Być może z wojskowego punktu widzenia takie wytłumaczenie by przeszło jednakże takie wytłumaczenie nie wystarcza w przypadku pisania encyklopedii opartej na prawdzie. Pozwól, że wyjaśnię na czym polega problem. Jeżeli powiemy "na wyposażeniu Wojsk Lądowych RP znajduje się 98 czołgów PT-91 i 135 czołgów T-72M1Z" to informacja wynikająca z tego stwierdzenia będzie następująca: "98 czołgów PT-91 zostało wyprodukowanych ,a 135 czołgów T-72M1 zostało przebudowanych do standardu PT-91". Jednakże jeżeli powiemy "na wyposażeniu Wojsk Lądowych RP znajduje się 233 czołgi PT-91" to informacja wynikająca z tego stwierdzenia będzie diametralnie inna w porównaniu do stanu faktycznego: "233 czołgi PT-91 zostało wyprodukowanych". Jak widzisz powstaje tu dość duże przekłamanie. I moim zdaniem lepiej normalnie napisać, że WP ma tyle i tyle czołgów PT-91 oraz tyle i tyle T-72M1Z niż później jeszcze dopisywać w nawiasie, że tyle i tyle zostało wyprodukowanych, a tyle i tyle zostało przebudowanych.
A na koniec mam jeszcze jedną sprawę do ciebie też dotyczącą wspomnianego wyżej artykułu. Co miałeś na myśli pisząc "when the rest of them was rebuild from T-72M1s to 0 hours/0 km PT-91"? Pomijając fakt iż zdanie powinno być następujące, żeby było poprawne: "while the rest are rebuild T-72M1s", to co ma znaczyć stwierdzenie "to 0 hours/0 km PT-91"?
Pozdrawiam. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 14:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Zauważyłem, że na twojej wikii Militarypedia używasz zdjęć z MONu. Z skąd wziąłeś pozwolenie na dobrowolne używanie tych zdjęć? Pytam bo przedwczoraj pewien administrator na Wikipedia Commons zakwestionował pozwolenie załatwione na podstawie emaila z centrum informacyjnego MONu z przed czterech lat i grozi to wielkim zubożeniem zasobów Wikipedii na temat polskich Sił Zbrojnych. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 15:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Rosomak M1 with RPGNet in Afghanistan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor ( talk) 18:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polish Air Force, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages W-3 and ASW. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polish Air Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lipowiec. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polish Land Forces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Rosomak M1 with RPGNet in Afghanistan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Corran.pl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:FBRadomWeapons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Corran.pl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Corran.pl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Corran.pl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Why did you replace SESM by Renk? The powerpack is 100% a French development from SESM which is a subsidiary of Renk. But there is not any Renk Techonology in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.6.64.10 ( talk) 06:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Why is the resolution so low on this image? Geni 22:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for contributing the MiG-29 article. The MiG-29K its an interesting edit. However, can you give a reason why you tailored all the description for the model from A - SM? I have to revert it until you came up with something to replace the deleted information. Regards, ChowHui ( talk) 16:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the info. Where did you get it from? Are you sure about it??? The structure you present is completely different from the structure I found on the homepage of the various Polish military units. Also this is a massive reduction in units - are you sure? See, if you are sure about your changes it is fine for me, but I ask because I want to be sure, that we upload a more correct version afterwards. greetings, -- noclador ( talk) 16:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
I have begun to update the article about the Polish Land Forces. First I redesigned the graphic for the 11th Armoured Cavalry Division next up the 16th Mechanized Division. As you can see I took the information from the official homepage of the 11th Armoured Cavalry Division: http://www.11ldkpanc.mil.pl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=69&Itemid=76 Over the next 2 weeks I will update all the graphics about the Polish Land Forces and in the end put them together to create a full graphic. -- noclador ( talk) 00:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello and welcome Corran.pl! Thank you for your contributions related to
Poland. You may be interested in visiting
Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board,
joining our discussions and
sharing your creations with our community. |
-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Please consider entering them at T:TDYK and WP:MILCON.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Witam.
Przejdę od razu do rzeczy. Chciałbym się zapytać dlaczego notorycznie manipulujesz informacjami w artykule o czołgu podstawowym PT-91. Jak się już pewnie domyśliłeś z tytułu tej wiadomości chodzi mi o ilość czołgów podstawowych PT-91 i T-72M1Z. Sytuacja ta jest dosyć specyficzna ponieważ jak udało mi się dowiedzieć jesteś bardzo dobrze obeznany z tematem militariów. Nie rozumiem więc dlaczego manipulujesz w ten sposób informacjami i jedyny wniosek do jakiego można w tej chwili dojść jest następujący: Manipulujesz te informacje by "pokazać Wojsko Polskie z lepszej strony". Podejrzewam, że zaraz iż w Wojsku Polskim T-72M1Z są traktowane tak samo jak PT-91 oraz że są one praktycznie identyczne i w ten sposób stwierdzisz iż nic wielkiego się nie stało. Być może z wojskowego punktu widzenia takie wytłumaczenie by przeszło jednakże takie wytłumaczenie nie wystarcza w przypadku pisania encyklopedii opartej na prawdzie. Pozwól, że wyjaśnię na czym polega problem. Jeżeli powiemy "na wyposażeniu Wojsk Lądowych RP znajduje się 98 czołgów PT-91 i 135 czołgów T-72M1Z" to informacja wynikająca z tego stwierdzenia będzie następująca: "98 czołgów PT-91 zostało wyprodukowanych ,a 135 czołgów T-72M1 zostało przebudowanych do standardu PT-91". Jednakże jeżeli powiemy "na wyposażeniu Wojsk Lądowych RP znajduje się 233 czołgi PT-91" to informacja wynikająca z tego stwierdzenia będzie diametralnie inna w porównaniu do stanu faktycznego: "233 czołgi PT-91 zostało wyprodukowanych". Jak widzisz powstaje tu dość duże przekłamanie. I moim zdaniem lepiej normalnie napisać, że WP ma tyle i tyle czołgów PT-91 oraz tyle i tyle T-72M1Z niż później jeszcze dopisywać w nawiasie, że tyle i tyle zostało wyprodukowanych, a tyle i tyle zostało przebudowanych.
A na koniec mam jeszcze jedną sprawę do ciebie też dotyczącą wspomnianego wyżej artykułu. Co miałeś na myśli pisząc "when the rest of them was rebuild from T-72M1s to 0 hours/0 km PT-91"? Pomijając fakt iż zdanie powinno być następujące, żeby było poprawne: "while the rest are rebuild T-72M1s", to co ma znaczyć stwierdzenie "to 0 hours/0 km PT-91"?
Pozdrawiam. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 14:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Zauważyłem, że na twojej wikii Militarypedia używasz zdjęć z MONu. Z skąd wziąłeś pozwolenie na dobrowolne używanie tych zdjęć? Pytam bo przedwczoraj pewien administrator na Wikipedia Commons zakwestionował pozwolenie załatwione na podstawie emaila z centrum informacyjnego MONu z przed czterech lat i grozi to wielkim zubożeniem zasobów Wikipedii na temat polskich Sił Zbrojnych. - SuperTank17 ( talk) 15:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Rosomak M1 with RPGNet in Afghanistan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor ( talk) 18:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polish Air Force, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages W-3 and ASW. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polish Air Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lipowiec. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polish Land Forces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Rosomak M1 with RPGNet in Afghanistan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Corran.pl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:FBRadomWeapons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Corran.pl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Corran.pl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Corran.pl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)