Main page |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so by clicking the "contact me" link above and starting a new topic there. |
-- 12.191.57.81 ( talk) 17:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Helo LilMarshmallowFace111 ( talk) 20:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Coolperson177. Thanks for attempting to do non-admin closures. But you should be careful not to do closures that you do not have the tools to implement. At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religion of peace, the consensus was to delete the article, then redirect it. But you closed it as a simple redirect. That was not the consensus. I have reopened the discussion, deleted the article, and then created the redirect. It's best to do NAC closures only on non-controversial or non-complicated results such as Keep, especially at first. If you have any questions or need any advice, just ask. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Why are you deleting the QuickSun Technologies article? I would like to tell you that QuickSun Technologies is an Indian Financial Company based in Gurgaon, India and the company served 30 state in India. And I work in the company and it is a big corporate company. I have attached the reference on article. Kindly remove the speedy deletion tag on the page. Thankyou Raebareli Area ( talk) 14:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kindly consider it. Raebareli Area ( talk) 14:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
As me posted. Now, if you're Scotish, you're exempt. Yours, sincerely Fossa ?! 01:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Ok to start love the username and you were right to delete my content I was just seeing how long it took for someone to take my edit down, 😇😈 LilMarshmallowFace111 ( talk) 20:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed that you added refs to Super Mario 64 however you ddin't use the {{cite web}} (or similar) template which (as far as I know) is required (or at least recommended) to be used in a ref. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Just figured I'd elaborate a bit more on why I uncapitalized hub. Hub isn't an acronym for something which is usually why something would be written in all caps. It might be shot for something but I can't really think of what it would be short for at the moment. Hub is simply the word used to describe a main area of a game that lets you access all other levels of the game, similar to a world map in Super Mario World. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
For your edits to Super Mario 64 which have improved the article even in minor ways. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
…for significant expansion of Super Mario 64. Elominius ( talk) 16:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC) |
Was what that user did deserving of a 4im warning? SoyokoAnis - talk 20:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Thankyou for closing Talk:Dino (disambiguation)#Requested move 24 November 2021 but you cut and pasted the talk page meaning that the edit history was left at "Talk:Dino (disambiguation)" while the content of the talk page was at "Talk:Dino". If you can't complete a move please list it at WP:RMT, thanks. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 17:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
I appreciate your closure as "no consensus" on File:Love Train - O'Jays.jpg, but do you think that's the right decision? I just saw one keep vote with inadequate justification and one comment. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Super Mario 64 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jibreel23 --
Jibreel23 (
talk) 17:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
The article
Super Mario 64 you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Super Mario 64 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jaguar --
Jaguar (
talk) 19:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thank you for your anti-vandalism work at Stuart Attwell & Happy New Years! Jerm ( talk) 15:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC) |
The article
Super Mario 64 you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:Super Mario 64 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jaguar --
Jaguar (
talk) 00:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Coolperson177. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 03:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
On 12 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Super Mario 64, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Super Mario 64 has been the subject of medical literature showing a correlation between habitual playing of 3D platformers and increased grey matter in the brain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Super Mario 64. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Super Mario 64), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Thank you for your significant expansion of Super Mario 64 which lead to it becoming a good article. Jibreel23 ( talk) 15:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC) |
@ Coolperson177: It is no problem. My review was not as thorough as Jaguar's. Thanks for the reference, I will be sure to use it in the future. - Jibreel23
Hey, coolperson177! I noticed your contribution to Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics :) I appreciate it! Unfortunately, there's a snag there—when articles get lots of views on dates that aren't the DYK date, they are subtracted out from the number of views the hook gets. So, for example, here, while the article gets 5,707 on its DYK date, it also got an average of around 1,150 views per day in the couple of days proceeding it. If you subtract those out, the number of views is equal to 5,707–1,141.5=4,565.5, which is a little below the 5,000 mark needed for inclusion. I'm really sorry about that! theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) ( they/she) 01:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey! I have a feeling you're busy with improving Super Mario 64 right now, however when you get the chance, would you mind helping me out with Euro Truck Simulator 2? I'm not quite wanting to go for a GA quite yet, however I do want to get to that point eventually. Right now I'm just improving the article based on what's in the peer review. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Featured Article Medal | |
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild ( talk) 00:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Quarter Million Award |
For your contributions to bring Super Mario 64 (estimated annual readership: 355,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg ( talk) 15:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC) |
Main page |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so by clicking the "contact me" link above and starting a new topic there. |
-- 12.191.57.81 ( talk) 17:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Helo LilMarshmallowFace111 ( talk) 20:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Coolperson177. Thanks for attempting to do non-admin closures. But you should be careful not to do closures that you do not have the tools to implement. At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religion of peace, the consensus was to delete the article, then redirect it. But you closed it as a simple redirect. That was not the consensus. I have reopened the discussion, deleted the article, and then created the redirect. It's best to do NAC closures only on non-controversial or non-complicated results such as Keep, especially at first. If you have any questions or need any advice, just ask. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Why are you deleting the QuickSun Technologies article? I would like to tell you that QuickSun Technologies is an Indian Financial Company based in Gurgaon, India and the company served 30 state in India. And I work in the company and it is a big corporate company. I have attached the reference on article. Kindly remove the speedy deletion tag on the page. Thankyou Raebareli Area ( talk) 14:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kindly consider it. Raebareli Area ( talk) 14:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
As me posted. Now, if you're Scotish, you're exempt. Yours, sincerely Fossa ?! 01:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Ok to start love the username and you were right to delete my content I was just seeing how long it took for someone to take my edit down, 😇😈 LilMarshmallowFace111 ( talk) 20:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed that you added refs to Super Mario 64 however you ddin't use the {{cite web}} (or similar) template which (as far as I know) is required (or at least recommended) to be used in a ref. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Just figured I'd elaborate a bit more on why I uncapitalized hub. Hub isn't an acronym for something which is usually why something would be written in all caps. It might be shot for something but I can't really think of what it would be short for at the moment. Hub is simply the word used to describe a main area of a game that lets you access all other levels of the game, similar to a world map in Super Mario World. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
For your edits to Super Mario 64 which have improved the article even in minor ways. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
…for significant expansion of Super Mario 64. Elominius ( talk) 16:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC) |
Was what that user did deserving of a 4im warning? SoyokoAnis - talk 20:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Thankyou for closing Talk:Dino (disambiguation)#Requested move 24 November 2021 but you cut and pasted the talk page meaning that the edit history was left at "Talk:Dino (disambiguation)" while the content of the talk page was at "Talk:Dino". If you can't complete a move please list it at WP:RMT, thanks. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 17:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
I appreciate your closure as "no consensus" on File:Love Train - O'Jays.jpg, but do you think that's the right decision? I just saw one keep vote with inadequate justification and one comment. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Super Mario 64 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jibreel23 --
Jibreel23 (
talk) 17:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
The article
Super Mario 64 you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Super Mario 64 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jaguar --
Jaguar (
talk) 19:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thank you for your anti-vandalism work at Stuart Attwell & Happy New Years! Jerm ( talk) 15:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC) |
The article
Super Mario 64 you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:Super Mario 64 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jaguar --
Jaguar (
talk) 00:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Coolperson177. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 03:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
On 12 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Super Mario 64, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Super Mario 64 has been the subject of medical literature showing a correlation between habitual playing of 3D platformers and increased grey matter in the brain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Super Mario 64. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Super Mario 64), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Thank you for your significant expansion of Super Mario 64 which lead to it becoming a good article. Jibreel23 ( talk) 15:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC) |
@ Coolperson177: It is no problem. My review was not as thorough as Jaguar's. Thanks for the reference, I will be sure to use it in the future. - Jibreel23
Hey, coolperson177! I noticed your contribution to Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics :) I appreciate it! Unfortunately, there's a snag there—when articles get lots of views on dates that aren't the DYK date, they are subtracted out from the number of views the hook gets. So, for example, here, while the article gets 5,707 on its DYK date, it also got an average of around 1,150 views per day in the couple of days proceeding it. If you subtract those out, the number of views is equal to 5,707–1,141.5=4,565.5, which is a little below the 5,000 mark needed for inclusion. I'm really sorry about that! theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) ( they/she) 01:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey! I have a feeling you're busy with improving Super Mario 64 right now, however when you get the chance, would you mind helping me out with Euro Truck Simulator 2? I'm not quite wanting to go for a GA quite yet, however I do want to get to that point eventually. Right now I'm just improving the article based on what's in the peer review. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Featured Article Medal | |
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild ( talk) 00:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Quarter Million Award |
For your contributions to bring Super Mario 64 (estimated annual readership: 355,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg ( talk) 15:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC) |