From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Colayer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair\ talk 06:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply


Conversations

==Copyright issue with 
 Conversations==

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Conversations, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://metalayer.com/1/concept/C_Markets.htm. As a copyright violation, Conversations appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Conversations has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk: Conversations and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk: Conversations with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk: Conversations.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Bongwarrior 07:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I have restored the text to your userspace as User:Colayer/Colayer. The article was deleted because of the G11 criterion of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion:

Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote a company, product, group, service, or person and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic

I also doubt that the company match WP:CORP notability guideline.

Please rewrite the article in a neutral, encyclopedic style and address the notability concerns. Happy editing Alex Bakharev 11:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Note the comment above. The article is written like an advertisement, not in a encyclopaedic style. You also need to provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. I'll hold off for now, to give you a chance to rewrite, but other editors may well still speedy delete this on any of the above criteria. Jimfbleak. talk. 14:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply
How can I avoid other editors to delete the content in the mean time? As you see, you are aware of the situation wereas others not! Is there any tag with which they ALL know about our discussion? Colayer 16:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply
For a new technology, notability may be impossible to prove, but your best bet might be to look for independent reviews of the software, mentions in the trade/professional press etc, and add those as a reference section. In terms of presentation, it must be worded less like an advert - fair comparison with similar products would also be a good point to show neutrality. Jimfbleak. talk. 15:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the note. Will see how best I can neutralise the whole content as references at this stage is impossible to get. Colayer 16:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Conflict of interest

Given your username and recent edits, you should probably review WP:COI and WP:U. If you are not officially representing Colayer corp, then then you username should be changed. Whether you are or are not, you should also be careful in how you contribute directly to articles related to Colayer corp. -- Ronz 16:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Shadab Lari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ronz 16:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

List of collaborative software

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of collaborative software. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Ronz 19:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks but how did other product links get in there? Not able to understand that. Colayer 07:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC) reply
I don't see any external links in the article, only internal links to other wiki articles. -- Ronz 15:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Does that mean internal links are allowed? Colayer 08:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Colayer

The article Colayer has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 14:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC) reply

dont understand why the modified text was deleted at all ... As compared to the past (first writeup) the text was totally changed to suit the criteria(s), still u guys continue to delete the content! Dont really understand yr intensions. There seems to be a gap between the administrators!!

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Colayer logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Colayer logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Colayer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair\ talk 06:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply


Conversations

==Copyright issue with 
 Conversations==

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Conversations, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://metalayer.com/1/concept/C_Markets.htm. As a copyright violation, Conversations appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Conversations has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk: Conversations and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk: Conversations with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk: Conversations.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Bongwarrior 07:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I have restored the text to your userspace as User:Colayer/Colayer. The article was deleted because of the G11 criterion of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion:

Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote a company, product, group, service, or person and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic

I also doubt that the company match WP:CORP notability guideline.

Please rewrite the article in a neutral, encyclopedic style and address the notability concerns. Happy editing Alex Bakharev 11:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Note the comment above. The article is written like an advertisement, not in a encyclopaedic style. You also need to provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. I'll hold off for now, to give you a chance to rewrite, but other editors may well still speedy delete this on any of the above criteria. Jimfbleak. talk. 14:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply
How can I avoid other editors to delete the content in the mean time? As you see, you are aware of the situation wereas others not! Is there any tag with which they ALL know about our discussion? Colayer 16:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply
For a new technology, notability may be impossible to prove, but your best bet might be to look for independent reviews of the software, mentions in the trade/professional press etc, and add those as a reference section. In terms of presentation, it must be worded less like an advert - fair comparison with similar products would also be a good point to show neutrality. Jimfbleak. talk. 15:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the note. Will see how best I can neutralise the whole content as references at this stage is impossible to get. Colayer 16:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Conflict of interest

Given your username and recent edits, you should probably review WP:COI and WP:U. If you are not officially representing Colayer corp, then then you username should be changed. Whether you are or are not, you should also be careful in how you contribute directly to articles related to Colayer corp. -- Ronz 16:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Shadab Lari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ronz 16:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

List of collaborative software

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of collaborative software. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Ronz 19:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks but how did other product links get in there? Not able to understand that. Colayer 07:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC) reply
I don't see any external links in the article, only internal links to other wiki articles. -- Ronz 15:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Does that mean internal links are allowed? Colayer 08:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Colayer

The article Colayer has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 14:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC) reply

dont understand why the modified text was deleted at all ... As compared to the past (first writeup) the text was totally changed to suit the criteria(s), still u guys continue to delete the content! Dont really understand yr intensions. There seems to be a gap between the administrators!!

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Colayer logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Colayer logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook