This is Chronus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
Hi, Chronus! What's up? In light of your interest and penchant for the illustration of architecture, you may also pay attention too to sub-articles such as Architecture of Madrid. There is life beyond the main articles. Best regards. Asqueladd ( talk) 19:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
@ Chronus Please stop adding outdated images in the infobox and throughout the article at Mumbai. Joy goel ( talk) 13:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parisii.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
I would encourage you not to engage with personal attacks, there is nothing to be gained from any further arguing with Becausewhynothuh?. See WP:BOOMERANG for advise on the subject. Cerebral726 ( talk) 19:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
MarchOfTheGreyhounds (
talk)
16:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
There might have been mistakes from my side. I am leaving this place as the admins have insulted my character. You know they have taken something very subjective and so I might move to court if they continue this. You have no faults, I'm sorry 25Aric ( talk) 16:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Regarding changes to the structure of the article, please see whether it can conform to WP:INCITIES guidelines, a specific one for Indian articles. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 14:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
"Cuisine" and "architecture" should really be within the "Culture" section" - That's true, which is why I only mentioned "Sports" and "Media". Anyway, the arrangement (before you started editing) wasn't per INCITIES either, so it needs correction and but possibly would require consensus before that since GA. I'll do it after sometime. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 16:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
I honor you for working to resolve the dispute pending on the New York City article talk page. This type of dispute resolution is not too common anymore on Wikipedia. Kudos! TheLionHasSeen ( talk) 20:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC) |
Template:Pie chart of the religion in Mexico has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
03:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[1] https://www.capital21.cdmx.gob.mx/noticias/?p=33415#:~:text=de%20septiembre%2C%202022-,Con%20445%20votos%20a%20favor%2C%208%20en%20contra%20y%2033,presidente%20Andr%C3%A9s%20Manuel%20L%C3%B3pez%20Obrador. 龙2000 ( talk) 01:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into
New York City. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I'd like to ask you to stop reverting edits concerning the Cisplatine Flag, for the time being there's no official historical source for this flag and I suspect it is entirely false. The only sources circle back to Wikipedia and it would not be the first time an apocryphal flag is attributed to historical entity in Wikipedia (see Austria-Hungary), be aware. Thanks. Coquimbo58 ( talk) 01:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Just as a heads up, I have reverted your changes on the article which reinstated the execution videos. There was an earlier discussion which opposed their inclusion. Ecrusized ( talk) 10:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Sdkb
talk
06:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
You quoted WP:STATUSQUO, I was respecting the status quo, you changed the image not me. The one you used is not very good, the previous one actually shows the BA skyline not just Puerto Madero. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 13:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited São Paulo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Expressway.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 21:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This is Chronus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
Hi, Chronus! What's up? In light of your interest and penchant for the illustration of architecture, you may also pay attention too to sub-articles such as Architecture of Madrid. There is life beyond the main articles. Best regards. Asqueladd ( talk) 19:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
@ Chronus Please stop adding outdated images in the infobox and throughout the article at Mumbai. Joy goel ( talk) 13:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parisii.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
I would encourage you not to engage with personal attacks, there is nothing to be gained from any further arguing with Becausewhynothuh?. See WP:BOOMERANG for advise on the subject. Cerebral726 ( talk) 19:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
MarchOfTheGreyhounds (
talk)
16:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
There might have been mistakes from my side. I am leaving this place as the admins have insulted my character. You know they have taken something very subjective and so I might move to court if they continue this. You have no faults, I'm sorry 25Aric ( talk) 16:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Regarding changes to the structure of the article, please see whether it can conform to WP:INCITIES guidelines, a specific one for Indian articles. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 14:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
"Cuisine" and "architecture" should really be within the "Culture" section" - That's true, which is why I only mentioned "Sports" and "Media". Anyway, the arrangement (before you started editing) wasn't per INCITIES either, so it needs correction and but possibly would require consensus before that since GA. I'll do it after sometime. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 16:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
I honor you for working to resolve the dispute pending on the New York City article talk page. This type of dispute resolution is not too common anymore on Wikipedia. Kudos! TheLionHasSeen ( talk) 20:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC) |
Template:Pie chart of the religion in Mexico has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
03:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[1] https://www.capital21.cdmx.gob.mx/noticias/?p=33415#:~:text=de%20septiembre%2C%202022-,Con%20445%20votos%20a%20favor%2C%208%20en%20contra%20y%2033,presidente%20Andr%C3%A9s%20Manuel%20L%C3%B3pez%20Obrador. 龙2000 ( talk) 01:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into
New York City. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I'd like to ask you to stop reverting edits concerning the Cisplatine Flag, for the time being there's no official historical source for this flag and I suspect it is entirely false. The only sources circle back to Wikipedia and it would not be the first time an apocryphal flag is attributed to historical entity in Wikipedia (see Austria-Hungary), be aware. Thanks. Coquimbo58 ( talk) 01:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Just as a heads up, I have reverted your changes on the article which reinstated the execution videos. There was an earlier discussion which opposed their inclusion. Ecrusized ( talk) 10:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Sdkb
talk
06:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
You quoted WP:STATUSQUO, I was respecting the status quo, you changed the image not me. The one you used is not very good, the previous one actually shows the BA skyline not just Puerto Madero. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 13:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited São Paulo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Expressway.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 21:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)