![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soft mouth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soft mouth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 00:12, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
US Banknote Contest |
![]() |
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canis lupus dingo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canis lupus dingo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 ( talk) 20:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Canis aquaticus. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#Canis aquaticus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesome Hwyh 18:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Sup? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.148.202 ( talk) 18:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Malagasy Mongoose; actual mongoose or mistake? Malagasy Carnivore
Image courtesy of themandus.org Copyright: themandus.org Neanderthal reconstruction courtesy of themandus.org
Answer: when it's a dog. When is a dog not a dog? A: When it's a dingo. When is a dingo not a dingo? A:When it's an Asian dingo. When does a dingo become just a dog? A:No exact place.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7290/full/nature08837.html
Hi Chris,
I have edited the Indian pariah dog article, tried to clean it up. But the clean up message in the heading still seems to be there... any suggestions?
Accepted by MSW3:
(Linnaeus, 1758)
(Gmelin, 1792)
(C. E. H. Smith, 1839)
(Krumbiegel, 1950)
taxon = Homo sapiens authority = Linnaeus, 1758 subdivision_ranks = Subspecies subdivision = † Homo sapiens idaltu Homo sapiens sapiens |synonyms = Species synonymy
| aethiopicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | americanus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | arabicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | australasicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | cafer
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | columbicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | hottentotus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | hyperboreus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | indicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | japeticus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | melaninus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | neptunianus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | patagonus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | scythicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | sinicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825
| aurignacensis
Klaatsch & Hauser, 1910
| capensis
Broom, 1917
| cro-magnonensis
Gregory, 1921 | grimaldiensis
Gregory, 1921
| drennani
Kleinschmidt, 1931
| eurafricanus
(Sergi, 1911)
| grimaldii
Lapouge, 1906 | priscus
Lapouge, 1899
| monstrosus
Linnaeus, 1758
| palestinus
McCown & Keith, 1932
| proto-aethiopicus
Giuffrida-Ruggeri, 1915
| spelaeus
Lapouge, 1899 | troglodytes
Linnaeus, 1758 | wadjakensis
Dubois, 1921
All pages with titles containing the word example
Section One | Section two |
---|---|
Item One | example |
New Guinea Singing Dog | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Scientific classification (unresolved [2]) | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: | |
Order: | |
Family: | |
Genus: | |
Species: | |
Subspecies: | C. l. dingo
|
Trinomial name | |
Canis lupus dingo (
Meyer, 1793)
|
New Guinea Singing Dog | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Other names | New Guinea Dingo Singing Dog Singer New Guinea Highland Dog New Guinea Wild Dog Hallstrom Dog New Guinea Singing Dingo NGSD NGD |
Origin | Papua New Guinea |
Dog ( domestic dog) |
References
status
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Superlatives attributed to the NGSD are unfounded. The closest dog to the wolf is the Basenji, according to this tree:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7290/fig_tab/nature08837_F1.html
Envision the dog family tree:
herding dogs, and the sighthounds; There are very few breeds which do not share this common ancestor, other than very ancient dogs.
According to this, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7290/fig_tab/nature08837_F1.html, the dog that shares the most ancient common ancestor with any other dog in the world is not the Dingo, not the NGSD, not the Inus, ancient Chinese dogs such as the Chow Chow, Nureongi, nothing.
Any further back in time, there is no living dog which is not a wolf.
Superlatives attributed to the NGSD are unfounded. The closest dog to the wolf is the Basenji, or rather the Basenji shares no common ancestor with any other dog alive on the planet.
The common ancestor of the Basenji and all other living dogs, may not have been a dog, it could have been a wolf. Or at least, there is no known living dog which proves this is was not the case.
Edible dog breeds have resulted from the practice of breeding dogs for their meat. They are rarely formally recognized as dog breeds by interentional kennel clubs, but have been as products of some American Indian, east Asian and Pacific peoples during periods of their history when dogs were farmed for food.
Edible dogs breeds include:
However, since then, the name was later changed to the "Chinese black-mouthed dog" when it was learned that the breed had many other uses in Chinese culture as well, including watch dog, livestock guardian dog, hunting dog and pulling carts and sleds. As the breed gained breeders and fanciers, the English name was changed to "Chow-chow" and finally "chow".
Also known as the Nureongi, this edible dog breed exists in possibly large numbers generally only in Korea. Because this medium-sized yellowish Spitz-type dog is preferred by people who eat dogmeat in Korean culture, it continues to exist in probably large numbers despite other types of dogs may be found among the Nureongi in Korean dog farms and dining tables.
The dog farmers of Igorot tribe of northern Luzon produced a dog that bred to type which looked somewhat like a very short-coated terrier which produced the best dogmeat according to the local culture. Although dog farming and eating was banned in the 1998, it remains unclear that neither the practice of dog-farming and -eating nor the edible dog breed no longer exist. It is also known a "the Korean native dog".
Dogmeat is not a feature of most cultures in Sumatra, or Indonesia but Batak tribe are an exception. Batek dogs, also known as the Batak spitze, have a uniform and distinct short and stocky spitz-type shape and curly tails, but come in many colors. While the Batek people have given up many of the beliefs and cultural practices of the hunter-gatherer ancestors, they have been slow to surrender their practice of eating Batak dogs.
Also known as the guri, Mauri dog, or New Zealand native dog, dogmeat was one of the primary uses for which the dogs were bred. They
Along with the practice of dog meat consumption in Hawaiian cultures, this formerly common dog now seems to be extinct. While children played with the dogs and they were used in ceremonies, breeding motivated by meat production left a short, fat, docile dog that could subsist on starches and breadfruit.
Reports of this dog being bred for dogmeat by Native Caribbean and North American culture date back to the first historical records.
In an area of what is now north-west modern day Mexico, ceramic figures associated with the colima people were found of a dog similar to the Mexican Hairless but much fatter with much shorter legs. Experts believe that the dog was breed primarily for its meat.
Itzcuintlipotzotli
Hi,i was thinking about the missing link in human evolution and why it has not been found,when i went to the time of the apes living happily in African jungles to the time when they could make tools and make rafts to leave Africa,would have to use "necessity is mother of invention" cliche, let us start with what could have been the beginning i think,firstly they must had to! it can not be from mainland Africa,so it must be from an island near Africa,so this is what i think happened,on some island in the jungle with many species,there was a fire through lightening,burnt their habitat,there were survivors but no food,so eventually they had to start foraging in burnt jungle and started eating burnt-half burnt or in some cases perfectly cooked (as we know now) food which enhanced their intellect enough to invent fire and then rafts and start moving away from the island, my logic is i can not imagine the apes,even over a period,decided to start eating cooked food,unfortunately we still nurture,i say unfortunately will be explained in my next article if anybody is interested in as this is the first stage as there are two more,we are in stage four now and it is a disaster,only good news is we can still can go back to stage three and hopefully have something to show for. P.S I only had to start learning IT to do shopping,emails,booking etc.,so no good at research or much else really.|||| — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobindghar8 ( talk • contribs) 14:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:Catch dog breeds has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BenKuykendall ( talk) 07:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Chrisrus! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
{{
Frs user|Chrisrus|limit}}
underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WEATHERMAN, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WEATHERMAN and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Wikipedia:WEATHERMAN during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Gusfriend (
talk)
10:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Chris, kittens are prolly another word, I would guess without looking Germanic? which spread across the kiddies of many felids, though large felids borrow from their cousins like Bears and Dogs in some English words for their kids. . .
Chris, you were the last message to me before my 7 year hiatus from W. You thanked me for adding the Rabbit clan to the bottom of your list of Animal Articles about animals whose English names were not clade-tight nor derived from donor languages. So now I am of course making my thank you for your thank you my first message on a brief revisit to W, though I may not be very active this phase. Thank you, Chris!
Here's hoping you're well, have had a satisfying 7 years and will have many to come.
Pandelver (
talk)
04:54, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Minor planet articles that might pass NASTRO, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Minor planet articles that might pass NASTRO and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Wikipedia:Minor planet articles that might pass NASTRO during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
InTheAstronomy32 (
talk)
16:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soft mouth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soft mouth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 00:12, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
US Banknote Contest |
![]() |
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canis lupus dingo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canis lupus dingo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 ( talk) 20:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Canis aquaticus. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#Canis aquaticus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesome Hwyh 18:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Sup? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.148.202 ( talk) 18:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Malagasy Mongoose; actual mongoose or mistake? Malagasy Carnivore
Image courtesy of themandus.org Copyright: themandus.org Neanderthal reconstruction courtesy of themandus.org
Answer: when it's a dog. When is a dog not a dog? A: When it's a dingo. When is a dingo not a dingo? A:When it's an Asian dingo. When does a dingo become just a dog? A:No exact place.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7290/full/nature08837.html
Hi Chris,
I have edited the Indian pariah dog article, tried to clean it up. But the clean up message in the heading still seems to be there... any suggestions?
Accepted by MSW3:
(Linnaeus, 1758)
(Gmelin, 1792)
(C. E. H. Smith, 1839)
(Krumbiegel, 1950)
taxon = Homo sapiens authority = Linnaeus, 1758 subdivision_ranks = Subspecies subdivision = † Homo sapiens idaltu Homo sapiens sapiens |synonyms = Species synonymy
| aethiopicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | americanus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | arabicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | australasicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | cafer
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | columbicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | hottentotus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | hyperboreus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | indicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | japeticus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | melaninus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | neptunianus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | patagonus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | scythicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825 | sinicus
Bory de St. Vincent, 1825
| aurignacensis
Klaatsch & Hauser, 1910
| capensis
Broom, 1917
| cro-magnonensis
Gregory, 1921 | grimaldiensis
Gregory, 1921
| drennani
Kleinschmidt, 1931
| eurafricanus
(Sergi, 1911)
| grimaldii
Lapouge, 1906 | priscus
Lapouge, 1899
| monstrosus
Linnaeus, 1758
| palestinus
McCown & Keith, 1932
| proto-aethiopicus
Giuffrida-Ruggeri, 1915
| spelaeus
Lapouge, 1899 | troglodytes
Linnaeus, 1758 | wadjakensis
Dubois, 1921
All pages with titles containing the word example
Section One | Section two |
---|---|
Item One | example |
New Guinea Singing Dog | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Scientific classification (unresolved [2]) | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: | |
Order: | |
Family: | |
Genus: | |
Species: | |
Subspecies: | C. l. dingo
|
Trinomial name | |
Canis lupus dingo (
Meyer, 1793)
|
New Guinea Singing Dog | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Other names | New Guinea Dingo Singing Dog Singer New Guinea Highland Dog New Guinea Wild Dog Hallstrom Dog New Guinea Singing Dingo NGSD NGD |
Origin | Papua New Guinea |
Dog ( domestic dog) |
References
status
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Superlatives attributed to the NGSD are unfounded. The closest dog to the wolf is the Basenji, according to this tree:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7290/fig_tab/nature08837_F1.html
Envision the dog family tree:
herding dogs, and the sighthounds; There are very few breeds which do not share this common ancestor, other than very ancient dogs.
According to this, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7290/fig_tab/nature08837_F1.html, the dog that shares the most ancient common ancestor with any other dog in the world is not the Dingo, not the NGSD, not the Inus, ancient Chinese dogs such as the Chow Chow, Nureongi, nothing.
Any further back in time, there is no living dog which is not a wolf.
Superlatives attributed to the NGSD are unfounded. The closest dog to the wolf is the Basenji, or rather the Basenji shares no common ancestor with any other dog alive on the planet.
The common ancestor of the Basenji and all other living dogs, may not have been a dog, it could have been a wolf. Or at least, there is no known living dog which proves this is was not the case.
Edible dog breeds have resulted from the practice of breeding dogs for their meat. They are rarely formally recognized as dog breeds by interentional kennel clubs, but have been as products of some American Indian, east Asian and Pacific peoples during periods of their history when dogs were farmed for food.
Edible dogs breeds include:
However, since then, the name was later changed to the "Chinese black-mouthed dog" when it was learned that the breed had many other uses in Chinese culture as well, including watch dog, livestock guardian dog, hunting dog and pulling carts and sleds. As the breed gained breeders and fanciers, the English name was changed to "Chow-chow" and finally "chow".
Also known as the Nureongi, this edible dog breed exists in possibly large numbers generally only in Korea. Because this medium-sized yellowish Spitz-type dog is preferred by people who eat dogmeat in Korean culture, it continues to exist in probably large numbers despite other types of dogs may be found among the Nureongi in Korean dog farms and dining tables.
The dog farmers of Igorot tribe of northern Luzon produced a dog that bred to type which looked somewhat like a very short-coated terrier which produced the best dogmeat according to the local culture. Although dog farming and eating was banned in the 1998, it remains unclear that neither the practice of dog-farming and -eating nor the edible dog breed no longer exist. It is also known a "the Korean native dog".
Dogmeat is not a feature of most cultures in Sumatra, or Indonesia but Batak tribe are an exception. Batek dogs, also known as the Batak spitze, have a uniform and distinct short and stocky spitz-type shape and curly tails, but come in many colors. While the Batek people have given up many of the beliefs and cultural practices of the hunter-gatherer ancestors, they have been slow to surrender their practice of eating Batak dogs.
Also known as the guri, Mauri dog, or New Zealand native dog, dogmeat was one of the primary uses for which the dogs were bred. They
Along with the practice of dog meat consumption in Hawaiian cultures, this formerly common dog now seems to be extinct. While children played with the dogs and they were used in ceremonies, breeding motivated by meat production left a short, fat, docile dog that could subsist on starches and breadfruit.
Reports of this dog being bred for dogmeat by Native Caribbean and North American culture date back to the first historical records.
In an area of what is now north-west modern day Mexico, ceramic figures associated with the colima people were found of a dog similar to the Mexican Hairless but much fatter with much shorter legs. Experts believe that the dog was breed primarily for its meat.
Itzcuintlipotzotli
Hi,i was thinking about the missing link in human evolution and why it has not been found,when i went to the time of the apes living happily in African jungles to the time when they could make tools and make rafts to leave Africa,would have to use "necessity is mother of invention" cliche, let us start with what could have been the beginning i think,firstly they must had to! it can not be from mainland Africa,so it must be from an island near Africa,so this is what i think happened,on some island in the jungle with many species,there was a fire through lightening,burnt their habitat,there were survivors but no food,so eventually they had to start foraging in burnt jungle and started eating burnt-half burnt or in some cases perfectly cooked (as we know now) food which enhanced their intellect enough to invent fire and then rafts and start moving away from the island, my logic is i can not imagine the apes,even over a period,decided to start eating cooked food,unfortunately we still nurture,i say unfortunately will be explained in my next article if anybody is interested in as this is the first stage as there are two more,we are in stage four now and it is a disaster,only good news is we can still can go back to stage three and hopefully have something to show for. P.S I only had to start learning IT to do shopping,emails,booking etc.,so no good at research or much else really.|||| — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobindghar8 ( talk • contribs) 14:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:Catch dog breeds has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BenKuykendall ( talk) 07:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Chrisrus! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
{{
Frs user|Chrisrus|limit}}
underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WEATHERMAN, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WEATHERMAN and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Wikipedia:WEATHERMAN during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Gusfriend (
talk)
10:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Chris, kittens are prolly another word, I would guess without looking Germanic? which spread across the kiddies of many felids, though large felids borrow from their cousins like Bears and Dogs in some English words for their kids. . .
Chris, you were the last message to me before my 7 year hiatus from W. You thanked me for adding the Rabbit clan to the bottom of your list of Animal Articles about animals whose English names were not clade-tight nor derived from donor languages. So now I am of course making my thank you for your thank you my first message on a brief revisit to W, though I may not be very active this phase. Thank you, Chris!
Here's hoping you're well, have had a satisfying 7 years and will have many to come.
Pandelver (
talk)
04:54, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Minor planet articles that might pass NASTRO, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Minor planet articles that might pass NASTRO and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Wikipedia:Minor planet articles that might pass NASTRO during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
InTheAstronomy32 (
talk)
16:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)