![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for your effort. Please note, there is a spelling error in the picture: Airfield is correct, (not Airfeild)
-- Schrauber5 ( talk) 15:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Ask NASA. They have not enabled the flight path for 7th flight. if anyone can wait then ok or i can publish a image without the flight path line with only waypoints or in another case not even without that. please raise this in this pic's page so that someone can assist us in this matter. from my side, i did all that i can and all that nasa provided everyone. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 10:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
see what god tells jpl.maybe this spot will becone tiny as a dot over a course of time as seen in the similar curiosity map post my by me in timeline of msl page just around the time of this percy and ginny map
Chinakpradhan ( talk) 06:23, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
where's the file Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Chinakpradhan! This is a link to to the map of the 9th flight. Recently I registered with the forum.nasaspaceflight.com to express regrets upon the map of Ingenuity's waypoints at the official nasa site. Hope it helps... Cherurbino ( talk) 23:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
done but please send next time in jpg format i had to convert from png to jpg Chinakpradhan ( talk) 03:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
{{Rename|NEW NAME + EXT|6|reason=bla bla bla}}
Thank you for uploading File:EDL Sequence of Tianwen-1 lander having Zhurong Rover upon it.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
i think the recent edits ensure the points needed to keep the file on wikipedia and not move for deletion and about criteria 10c i have kept the article names in bold that use this image. so i think i must remove the notice from the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=File:EDL_Sequence_of_Tianwen-1_lander_having_Zhurong_Rover_upon_it.gif&type=revision&diff=1031925232&oldid=1031922388&diffmode=source
Chinakpradhan ( talk) 06:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of space travelers by name, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Bennett.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you entered the folloing coordinates as airfield G 18.42810|N|77.44422|E If I shift the airfield F by 95m west I get 18.428083° 77.443767° which is 25 meters more to the west. What is the source of your coordinates? Schrauber5 ( talk) 19:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Forgot to add the commander and exp back, sorry. I noticed someone messed with the template, but i didnt know which revision, so tried correcting manually. Now ive checked, and @ 2409:4065:E92:F54D:4552:1D69:A1F:B5FE had removed that bit. Galopujacyjez ( talk) 13:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
There is no fixed shift between UTC and Mars time but it changes all the time. The Mars time is extendend by 3% so the there are 24 Mars h each 60 minutes an 60 s for one sol. Flight 11 has happened at August 05, 2021 at 4:51 (UTC) Schrauber5 ( talk) 08:19, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Ok thanks Chinakpradhan ( talk) 09:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
You can just edit the template values here to get a conversion: August 26, 2021 at 18:41 (UTC) Schrauber5 ( talk) 07:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Which template are you referring please tell again clearly Chinakpradhan ( talk) 09:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
And where to edit the template you told. I didn't understood it Chinakpradhan ( talk) 09:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assembly of the International Space Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nauka.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Nauka Module Launch Mission Patch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nauka Module Launch Mission Patch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Molly Brown ( talk) 00:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.space.com/osiris-rex-asteroid-probe-could-visit-apophis-2029, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Inspiration4 mission crew.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
DonIago (
talk)
05:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soyuz MS-19 Crew Qualification Exams.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq ( talk) 18:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soyuz MS-19 Official Crew Potrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq ( talk) 18:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Adding knowingly wrong statements to Wikipedia is vandalism. Stop this immediately please. The source says we don't know who flies, so don't pretend you would know. -- mfb ( talk) 08:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:9TeamBracket-AFC has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk)
16:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Please delete Chinakpradhan ( talk) 17:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Edit summary reminder | |
Hello. I noticed that your edit to International Space Station did not include an edit summary. Please remember to use one for every edit, even minor ones. You can enable the wiki software to prompt you for one before making an edit by setting your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thanks, - ~mitch~ ( talk) 19:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Ok thanks Chinakpradhan ( talk) 19:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Shenzhou 13.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Zhurong rover and Tianwen-1 lander taken from Tianwen-1 remote camera.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason given by recent edits on the page Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Shenzhou 13.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
No launch before NET May 2022 CRS-20 ( talk) 00:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Don't disturb that's crew 4 Chinakpradhan ( talk) 02:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
I thought you mean by crew 3 launch. Bro i say you forgot axiom 1 mission they will never dock to zenith port Chinakpradhan ( talk) 02:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm noticing that you seem to insert comments into every single change you make. Please don't insert comments without a good reason to do so. Put comments on your edit into the edit summary. Ergzay ( talk) 08:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that in List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches you are using in-line comments to create drafts of upcoming completed launches. Rather than doing that, please create the pages you want in userspace drafts and then you can copy them to the article as you feel free to do so. See WP:UD for info on how to create drafts. The reason I say this is it causes needless churn in the article history and it's hard to tell what edits are happening by looking at the edit log. Ergzay ( talk) 09:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
I understood my mistake so talked nothing more Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASI.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of human spaceflights in Tiangong Program. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of human spaceflights to the Tiangong space station. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of human spaceflights to the Tiangong space station. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Htanaungg ( talk) 15:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Only three lines are separate, so Htanaungg ca0n you add a merge tag so that my information will be added after that I am willing that my article is deleted Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Chinakpradhan Numerous edits you have made in the last several months have added information to articles without any kind of citation. When adding new information, please add a citation if there is not already a citation in the article. Ergzay ( talk) 16:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Ok Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
In important ones I apply the citations and I don't reuse much those citations that are already in the article Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Ok Chinakpradhan ( talk) 17:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Chinakpradhan You continue to do this. You just copy paste information from other sources or other pages without properly understanding what you are copy pasting. You cause more work for other people reverting your edits. Ergzay ( talk) 20:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Please add a source for this change: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches&curid=37574004&diff=1054541030&oldid=1054540570 Ergzay ( talk) 20:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
No source but other mission tell so i added Chinakpradhan ( talk) 23:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Infobox space film, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 23:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
You've continued to put unnecessary comments as in this edit. Please put them in edit summary field instead. Hemanthah ( talk) 07:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Is the matter solved now?? Hemanthah Chinakpradhan ( talk) 10:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Hemanthah, I thought my work would be removed by thinking it not a reliable source so I mentioned Elon who tweeted on this Chinakpradhan ( talk) 11:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SpaceX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dnepr.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Apollo command and service module, you may be
blocked from editing.
BilCat (
talk)
07:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
BilCat, I was highlighting their engines in the infobox Chinakpradhan ( talk) 07:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
BilCat was it wrong to add importance to the engine on that page Chinakpradhan ( talk) 07:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
I was going to cite the sources after completing the whole editing then I was to add on that page Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
And BilCat upon the question you asked about the consensus Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
I want to say that for n1 rocket the breaking engine is blok d like SPS engine. This caused me to also put information about the SPS, lmae, lmde engines on the infoboxes of the spacecrafts that use them BilCat Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
N1 rocket has the fifth stage as Blok D Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
It's usage is similar to the engine used on Apollo lunar service module Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
I tried to create recognition of that SPS engine Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
So sir can i write that in infobox again if you agree Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Ok sir i am making a draft at a separate location outside wikipedia and paste it so that sources and edits appear at the same time Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Wretchskull (alt), can you tell what do you mean by unreferenced addition in edit summary given for revert of my edits when I have provided those edits with more than 2 references Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Ah sorry I meant to ask Wretchskull not Wretchskull (alt). Regarding Ergzay, I will implement your suggestion from next edits Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi! What does this comment means? You seem to imply that File:The Soyuz MS-20 crew (cropped).jpg is non-free, while it is by a NASA astronaut - so it is okay to be in Commons and used in the Wiki. Erick Soares3 ( talk) 15:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Erick Soares3, I find no problem with that Soyuz MS-20 crew portrait. I like that very much like the mission patch Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
But, please i want first that flickr tag to be removed from the main image from which it was attracted. Because some administrators will remove it if they find the tag still there. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
As it tells This file may be deleted after the uploader is notified using {{subst:unfreeflickrnote|File:The Soyuz MS-20 and Expedition 66 crews.jpg}} Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
I remember the SpaceX crew-3 issue we discussed. Ya you got it. I want to discuss about the flickr tag posted on your images before posting them on wikipedia. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
But as you told me i will keep them in their respective places as it is. But this is a problem earlier they were nominating such files for deletion now Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
They are using that bot tags Chinakpradhan ( talk) 19:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
I think Huntster, one of the administators must help us out with this. Hope he joins this topic as I have seen some nasa imagery with flickr tags stating those images to be reviewed by him as commons compatible ones. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 19:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
this is also a image i am in waiting for uploading till the result of your one Chinakpradhan ( talk) 19:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Huntster, Thank you very much! If NASA acknowledged their own free copyright on Flickr, everything would be far easier... Chinakpradhan, understood what I said about the patch difference? Sadly that the earlier version still have this deletion request that may affect a couple hundred of these patchs. 10:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Ya Erick Soares3, I understood the difference Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
By the way jf you are willing can I place the new image on all pages that use the older ones so that other wikis are kept updated of this topic Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
In case the earlier one is deleted the others pages don't face problem with that changes Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Starlink next launch: Do you have any ref for the Altitude of 540 km and the Inclination of 53.22°? Such an Inclination from Vandenberg will pass the hole North American continent. Normaly Vandenberg will be used for higth Inclination such as 70° or 97.6°, so the launch will go to the sea (security in case of an accident). Barny22 ( talk) 17:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-next-starlink-launch-different-orbit/ Ah i made a digital typing error by writing 540km in place of 550km Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I previously wrote in a previous comment "Use the "Show Preview" button on the edit page of the article rather than clicking "Publish Changes". You should only click "Publish Changes" when you are reasonably confident that there will be no further edits needed. Don't use additional edits instead of using a preview." However you don't seem to be doing this and every one of your edits seem to consist of 5 or more edits instead of a single edit. Please try to condense your editing down a bit. It's okay to make mistakes but I question why mistakes must happen every time you edit and why it takes so many additional edits to fix your mistakes. Ergzay ( talk) 04:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
You have several times used random twitter posts as sources on SpaceX articles or added unsourced information. Please do not do that. If it's not someone who authoritatively can know something (for example Elon Musk or a reporter), then they are not a valid source to use. If you cannot find a source, then do not add the information.
Examples:
Ergzay ( talk) 05:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to
Timeline of Mars 2020 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. nasaspaceflight.com is a copyright website! —
Diannaa (
talk)
19:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Happy 2022! I build this crew portrait from the Soyuz MS-19 with the images that were already available with free access on Wikimedia Commons. Shipenko's upscaling and correcting is far from the ideal, but it is something (the original crop was just an icon). What do you think? If you have any idea on how to improve it, go for it! Thanks, Erick Soares3 ( talk) 22:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Oh wow🥳 Erick Soares3 great eyes you have how you got klim shipenko from salyut 7 imagery I spent a week on Wikimedia but can't find it I give a salyut to you. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 01:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
You gave a real new year gift for me Chinakpradhan ( talk) 01:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
The image is nice but can you lessen the contrast of this image Erick Soares3 there is too much glow on his face can it be lessened Chinakpradhan ( talk) 01:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Anna Menon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─
The Aafī
(talk)
03:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Please check and review your article's meta data before submitting it to AfC processing. I found that you sorted this as "Gillis, Sarah", whereas this person is named "Anne Menon". I don't see how this problem occurred, since I previously already corrected that issue when your draft was in mainspace. Why would you add the wrong sortkey to the article? Blind copypasting is not a good idea. -- 65.92.246.142 ( talk) 14:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Anna Menon, this was my first translation and I don't know how to "properly attributed where you got your text from." 65.92.246.142 please help out Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
@ 65.92.246.142: this Gillis, Sarah problem developed later while making another page Chinakpradhan ( talk) 17:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
And to say, WP:CWW tells "At minimum, this means providing an edit summary at the destination page – that is, the page into which the material is copied – stating that content was copied, together with a link to the source (copied-from) page, e.g. Copied content from [[<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution."I didn't a cut actually said that correctly but see I told "Making a page no for him from French wikipedia resources" (And to say I I missed w in now). On French wiki only anna menon oage is there where you see the info so I said that. That much was also an attribution. Actually I didn't knew attribution is needed then also I did part attribution. But my page was moved to draftspace 65.92.246.142 Chinakpradhan ( talk) 17:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Soyuz MS-23, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
11:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
And 65.92.246.142 this page utilizes the source code framework of Soyuz MS-20 within this wikipedia but what extra attribution does it need it was a well established page and do know why this page was moved to draftspsce. Any reason?? Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Chinakpradhan!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Artem.G (
talk)
17:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
|
FYI, Wikipedia uses the convention of indenting a reply to a message. It is detailed in WP:TALKREPLY. You may wish to use that as it keeps comments in order, so that a discussion thread can be followed more easily -- 65.92.246.142 ( talk) 22:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi... It looks like you might have "merged" Sarah Gilis with Sarah Gillis by copypasting rather than by moving things around and merging histories. Is that correct? If so I think you've run afoul of WP:CWW again. This can be fixed but it will take a bit of work. All the edit history at Sarah Gilis has been lost. The better way to do this would have been with a series of moves and merges. I think you might want to slow down just a bit, ask for help instead of moving things around by copy paste. I hadn't really intended to get involved in fixing this but I do have admin, however rusty. I hope another admin with more current skills might be able to do it.
Also, looking over the content in the article now, it's pretty close to the Polaris Dawn crew member synopsis. ( https://polarisprogram.com/team/ ) A light rewording that doesn't change the sentence structure much is still plagiarism. That's another thing that suggests slowing down is better. I hope these suggestions are helpful. ++ Lar: t/ c 02:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Please do Lar if anything is left in this article marger as I am a little bit busy on my ddraftspace of anna menon. I am editing there so not getting time to think of merger. So if I increased your workloads by any means Chinakpradhan ( talk) 17:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Draft:Anna Menon, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
-Toast (
talk)
17:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
At end of January you added in the section Nauka (ISS module)#Installation of outfitting equipment: " Another MLM outfitting called means of attachment of large payloads is scheduled to be delivered to Nauka by a Progress MS spacecraft." (You also added it as Future Components in Template:ISS modules)
Do you have a ref therefore? If yes, can you add the ref please.
Barny22 ( talk) 14:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
@ Barny22: it is on Anatoly's page as Insider content Chinakpradhan ( talk) 14:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
please never aim to remove this statement the most you will get of this equipment is name mention in web.@ Barny22:, and for that insider's content here's the ref http://www.russianspaceweb.com/iss-fgb2-mlm-integration.html this one is free It's probably in the insider's content of spacewalks 57 and 58. And so see so later spacewalks!! That's why limited refs Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
OK I will do quickly Chinakpradhan ( talk) 19:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
@ Barny22: last time pinging you just to tell I have added the refs on Nauka (ISS module)#Installation of outfitting equipmentI don't think I need to add these anywhere else. Please tell if needed. Thank you. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 20:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you sir for the praise. will try to add more as I found on web.Have a nice day. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 21:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Matter is resolved @ Barny22: https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=23444.msg2356412#msg2356412 but please help me out once as to what color scheme should I use for non installed modules. I use black colour for the former modules but I dont see a distinguishable color scheme for non installed modules. Please suggest a colour scheme. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 01:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
@ Scottd521 can you please suggest a suitable colour for this please?? Chinakpradhan ( talk) 09:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the ref. I edited your cite to add the access date, because that web page gets updated a lot. An interested reader can use the access date to retrieve an archived copy of the web page as of the access date. - Arch dude ( talk) 13:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey, so I am going to rewrite the whole article with good sources, and I think that you maybe are interested about the topic as well. This is a part of the Wikipedia:Constellation program where we will do and get actual, concrete progress on spaceflight articles. Thoughts? CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 11:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't have time for starship already ginny and falcon 9 eats my head with ton of updates each time. However if I get time I will try my best but seriously I do almost negligible contribution to starship. @ CactiStaccingCrane Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Ask zimzalabim @ CactiStaccingCrane Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Ingenuity is way too perfect bro for any changes @ CactiStaccingCrane regarding any thing to be corrected is the problem with that bulky table for it the table is already in discussion to moved to a separate page on Ingenuity's talk page see there once. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I think it must be removed till a page List of Ingenuity flights is made you can do creativity there ( I mean improvement) BTW instead of thinking of adding Ingenuity to that constellation program first think of changing the timeline of Mars 2020 page it had already got a unencyclopediac notice in a section due to more images and nobody tells what happened to Mars 2020 mission after one year on that page Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I tried but I got this notice Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
OK please then help out CactiStaccingCrane maybe it's has become bad article due to regular updates but I have tried my best. update for constructive works if you get time in future after starship and timeline of Mars 2020 Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of space travelers by name, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Hines.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SpaceX Crew-4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Chinakpradhan! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Could you provide references if you're going to repeatedly share this information? Have not found anything apart from a Twitter thread claiming it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.97.232.200 ( talk) 00:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shenzhou 14, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chen Dong.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
SpaceX Crew-7, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (
t ·
c)
buidhe
13:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Artem.G ( talk) 18:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Thank you @ Artem.G Chinakpradhan ( talk) 01:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for your effort. Please note, there is a spelling error in the picture: Airfield is correct, (not Airfeild)
-- Schrauber5 ( talk) 15:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Ask NASA. They have not enabled the flight path for 7th flight. if anyone can wait then ok or i can publish a image without the flight path line with only waypoints or in another case not even without that. please raise this in this pic's page so that someone can assist us in this matter. from my side, i did all that i can and all that nasa provided everyone. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 10:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
see what god tells jpl.maybe this spot will becone tiny as a dot over a course of time as seen in the similar curiosity map post my by me in timeline of msl page just around the time of this percy and ginny map
Chinakpradhan ( talk) 06:23, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
where's the file Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Chinakpradhan! This is a link to to the map of the 9th flight. Recently I registered with the forum.nasaspaceflight.com to express regrets upon the map of Ingenuity's waypoints at the official nasa site. Hope it helps... Cherurbino ( talk) 23:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
done but please send next time in jpg format i had to convert from png to jpg Chinakpradhan ( talk) 03:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
{{Rename|NEW NAME + EXT|6|reason=bla bla bla}}
Thank you for uploading File:EDL Sequence of Tianwen-1 lander having Zhurong Rover upon it.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
i think the recent edits ensure the points needed to keep the file on wikipedia and not move for deletion and about criteria 10c i have kept the article names in bold that use this image. so i think i must remove the notice from the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=File:EDL_Sequence_of_Tianwen-1_lander_having_Zhurong_Rover_upon_it.gif&type=revision&diff=1031925232&oldid=1031922388&diffmode=source
Chinakpradhan ( talk) 06:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of space travelers by name, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Bennett.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you entered the folloing coordinates as airfield G 18.42810|N|77.44422|E If I shift the airfield F by 95m west I get 18.428083° 77.443767° which is 25 meters more to the west. What is the source of your coordinates? Schrauber5 ( talk) 19:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Forgot to add the commander and exp back, sorry. I noticed someone messed with the template, but i didnt know which revision, so tried correcting manually. Now ive checked, and @ 2409:4065:E92:F54D:4552:1D69:A1F:B5FE had removed that bit. Galopujacyjez ( talk) 13:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
There is no fixed shift between UTC and Mars time but it changes all the time. The Mars time is extendend by 3% so the there are 24 Mars h each 60 minutes an 60 s for one sol. Flight 11 has happened at August 05, 2021 at 4:51 (UTC) Schrauber5 ( talk) 08:19, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Ok thanks Chinakpradhan ( talk) 09:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
You can just edit the template values here to get a conversion: August 26, 2021 at 18:41 (UTC) Schrauber5 ( talk) 07:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Which template are you referring please tell again clearly Chinakpradhan ( talk) 09:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
And where to edit the template you told. I didn't understood it Chinakpradhan ( talk) 09:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assembly of the International Space Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nauka.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Nauka Module Launch Mission Patch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nauka Module Launch Mission Patch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Molly Brown ( talk) 00:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.space.com/osiris-rex-asteroid-probe-could-visit-apophis-2029, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Inspiration4 mission crew.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
DonIago (
talk)
05:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soyuz MS-19 Crew Qualification Exams.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq ( talk) 18:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soyuz MS-19 Official Crew Potrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq ( talk) 18:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Adding knowingly wrong statements to Wikipedia is vandalism. Stop this immediately please. The source says we don't know who flies, so don't pretend you would know. -- mfb ( talk) 08:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:9TeamBracket-AFC has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk)
16:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Please delete Chinakpradhan ( talk) 17:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Edit summary reminder | |
Hello. I noticed that your edit to International Space Station did not include an edit summary. Please remember to use one for every edit, even minor ones. You can enable the wiki software to prompt you for one before making an edit by setting your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thanks, - ~mitch~ ( talk) 19:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Ok thanks Chinakpradhan ( talk) 19:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Shenzhou 13.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Zhurong rover and Tianwen-1 lander taken from Tianwen-1 remote camera.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason given by recent edits on the page Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Shenzhou 13.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
No launch before NET May 2022 CRS-20 ( talk) 00:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Don't disturb that's crew 4 Chinakpradhan ( talk) 02:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
I thought you mean by crew 3 launch. Bro i say you forgot axiom 1 mission they will never dock to zenith port Chinakpradhan ( talk) 02:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm noticing that you seem to insert comments into every single change you make. Please don't insert comments without a good reason to do so. Put comments on your edit into the edit summary. Ergzay ( talk) 08:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that in List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches you are using in-line comments to create drafts of upcoming completed launches. Rather than doing that, please create the pages you want in userspace drafts and then you can copy them to the article as you feel free to do so. See WP:UD for info on how to create drafts. The reason I say this is it causes needless churn in the article history and it's hard to tell what edits are happening by looking at the edit log. Ergzay ( talk) 09:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
I understood my mistake so talked nothing more Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASI.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of human spaceflights in Tiangong Program. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of human spaceflights to the Tiangong space station. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of human spaceflights to the Tiangong space station. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Htanaungg ( talk) 15:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Only three lines are separate, so Htanaungg ca0n you add a merge tag so that my information will be added after that I am willing that my article is deleted Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Chinakpradhan Numerous edits you have made in the last several months have added information to articles without any kind of citation. When adding new information, please add a citation if there is not already a citation in the article. Ergzay ( talk) 16:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Ok Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
In important ones I apply the citations and I don't reuse much those citations that are already in the article Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Ok Chinakpradhan ( talk) 17:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Chinakpradhan You continue to do this. You just copy paste information from other sources or other pages without properly understanding what you are copy pasting. You cause more work for other people reverting your edits. Ergzay ( talk) 20:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Please add a source for this change: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches&curid=37574004&diff=1054541030&oldid=1054540570 Ergzay ( talk) 20:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
No source but other mission tell so i added Chinakpradhan ( talk) 23:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Infobox space film, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 23:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
You've continued to put unnecessary comments as in this edit. Please put them in edit summary field instead. Hemanthah ( talk) 07:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Is the matter solved now?? Hemanthah Chinakpradhan ( talk) 10:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Hemanthah, I thought my work would be removed by thinking it not a reliable source so I mentioned Elon who tweeted on this Chinakpradhan ( talk) 11:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SpaceX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dnepr.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Apollo command and service module, you may be
blocked from editing.
BilCat (
talk)
07:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
BilCat, I was highlighting their engines in the infobox Chinakpradhan ( talk) 07:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
BilCat was it wrong to add importance to the engine on that page Chinakpradhan ( talk) 07:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
I was going to cite the sources after completing the whole editing then I was to add on that page Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
And BilCat upon the question you asked about the consensus Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
I want to say that for n1 rocket the breaking engine is blok d like SPS engine. This caused me to also put information about the SPS, lmae, lmde engines on the infoboxes of the spacecrafts that use them BilCat Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
N1 rocket has the fifth stage as Blok D Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
It's usage is similar to the engine used on Apollo lunar service module Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
I tried to create recognition of that SPS engine Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
So sir can i write that in infobox again if you agree Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Ok sir i am making a draft at a separate location outside wikipedia and paste it so that sources and edits appear at the same time Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Wretchskull (alt), can you tell what do you mean by unreferenced addition in edit summary given for revert of my edits when I have provided those edits with more than 2 references Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Ah sorry I meant to ask Wretchskull not Wretchskull (alt). Regarding Ergzay, I will implement your suggestion from next edits Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi! What does this comment means? You seem to imply that File:The Soyuz MS-20 crew (cropped).jpg is non-free, while it is by a NASA astronaut - so it is okay to be in Commons and used in the Wiki. Erick Soares3 ( talk) 15:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Erick Soares3, I find no problem with that Soyuz MS-20 crew portrait. I like that very much like the mission patch Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
But, please i want first that flickr tag to be removed from the main image from which it was attracted. Because some administrators will remove it if they find the tag still there. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
As it tells This file may be deleted after the uploader is notified using {{subst:unfreeflickrnote|File:The Soyuz MS-20 and Expedition 66 crews.jpg}} Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
I remember the SpaceX crew-3 issue we discussed. Ya you got it. I want to discuss about the flickr tag posted on your images before posting them on wikipedia. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
But as you told me i will keep them in their respective places as it is. But this is a problem earlier they were nominating such files for deletion now Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
They are using that bot tags Chinakpradhan ( talk) 19:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
I think Huntster, one of the administators must help us out with this. Hope he joins this topic as I have seen some nasa imagery with flickr tags stating those images to be reviewed by him as commons compatible ones. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 19:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
this is also a image i am in waiting for uploading till the result of your one Chinakpradhan ( talk) 19:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Huntster, Thank you very much! If NASA acknowledged their own free copyright on Flickr, everything would be far easier... Chinakpradhan, understood what I said about the patch difference? Sadly that the earlier version still have this deletion request that may affect a couple hundred of these patchs. 10:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Ya Erick Soares3, I understood the difference Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
By the way jf you are willing can I place the new image on all pages that use the older ones so that other wikis are kept updated of this topic Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
In case the earlier one is deleted the others pages don't face problem with that changes Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Starlink next launch: Do you have any ref for the Altitude of 540 km and the Inclination of 53.22°? Such an Inclination from Vandenberg will pass the hole North American continent. Normaly Vandenberg will be used for higth Inclination such as 70° or 97.6°, so the launch will go to the sea (security in case of an accident). Barny22 ( talk) 17:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-next-starlink-launch-different-orbit/ Ah i made a digital typing error by writing 540km in place of 550km Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I previously wrote in a previous comment "Use the "Show Preview" button on the edit page of the article rather than clicking "Publish Changes". You should only click "Publish Changes" when you are reasonably confident that there will be no further edits needed. Don't use additional edits instead of using a preview." However you don't seem to be doing this and every one of your edits seem to consist of 5 or more edits instead of a single edit. Please try to condense your editing down a bit. It's okay to make mistakes but I question why mistakes must happen every time you edit and why it takes so many additional edits to fix your mistakes. Ergzay ( talk) 04:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
You have several times used random twitter posts as sources on SpaceX articles or added unsourced information. Please do not do that. If it's not someone who authoritatively can know something (for example Elon Musk or a reporter), then they are not a valid source to use. If you cannot find a source, then do not add the information.
Examples:
Ergzay ( talk) 05:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to
Timeline of Mars 2020 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. nasaspaceflight.com is a copyright website! —
Diannaa (
talk)
19:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Happy 2022! I build this crew portrait from the Soyuz MS-19 with the images that were already available with free access on Wikimedia Commons. Shipenko's upscaling and correcting is far from the ideal, but it is something (the original crop was just an icon). What do you think? If you have any idea on how to improve it, go for it! Thanks, Erick Soares3 ( talk) 22:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Oh wow🥳 Erick Soares3 great eyes you have how you got klim shipenko from salyut 7 imagery I spent a week on Wikimedia but can't find it I give a salyut to you. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 01:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
You gave a real new year gift for me Chinakpradhan ( talk) 01:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
The image is nice but can you lessen the contrast of this image Erick Soares3 there is too much glow on his face can it be lessened Chinakpradhan ( talk) 01:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Anna Menon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─
The Aafī
(talk)
03:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Please check and review your article's meta data before submitting it to AfC processing. I found that you sorted this as "Gillis, Sarah", whereas this person is named "Anne Menon". I don't see how this problem occurred, since I previously already corrected that issue when your draft was in mainspace. Why would you add the wrong sortkey to the article? Blind copypasting is not a good idea. -- 65.92.246.142 ( talk) 14:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Anna Menon, this was my first translation and I don't know how to "properly attributed where you got your text from." 65.92.246.142 please help out Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
@ 65.92.246.142: this Gillis, Sarah problem developed later while making another page Chinakpradhan ( talk) 17:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
And to say, WP:CWW tells "At minimum, this means providing an edit summary at the destination page – that is, the page into which the material is copied – stating that content was copied, together with a link to the source (copied-from) page, e.g. Copied content from [[<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution."I didn't a cut actually said that correctly but see I told "Making a page no for him from French wikipedia resources" (And to say I I missed w in now). On French wiki only anna menon oage is there where you see the info so I said that. That much was also an attribution. Actually I didn't knew attribution is needed then also I did part attribution. But my page was moved to draftspace 65.92.246.142 Chinakpradhan ( talk) 17:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Soyuz MS-23, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
11:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
And 65.92.246.142 this page utilizes the source code framework of Soyuz MS-20 within this wikipedia but what extra attribution does it need it was a well established page and do know why this page was moved to draftspsce. Any reason?? Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Chinakpradhan!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Artem.G (
talk)
17:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
|
FYI, Wikipedia uses the convention of indenting a reply to a message. It is detailed in WP:TALKREPLY. You may wish to use that as it keeps comments in order, so that a discussion thread can be followed more easily -- 65.92.246.142 ( talk) 22:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi... It looks like you might have "merged" Sarah Gilis with Sarah Gillis by copypasting rather than by moving things around and merging histories. Is that correct? If so I think you've run afoul of WP:CWW again. This can be fixed but it will take a bit of work. All the edit history at Sarah Gilis has been lost. The better way to do this would have been with a series of moves and merges. I think you might want to slow down just a bit, ask for help instead of moving things around by copy paste. I hadn't really intended to get involved in fixing this but I do have admin, however rusty. I hope another admin with more current skills might be able to do it.
Also, looking over the content in the article now, it's pretty close to the Polaris Dawn crew member synopsis. ( https://polarisprogram.com/team/ ) A light rewording that doesn't change the sentence structure much is still plagiarism. That's another thing that suggests slowing down is better. I hope these suggestions are helpful. ++ Lar: t/ c 02:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Please do Lar if anything is left in this article marger as I am a little bit busy on my ddraftspace of anna menon. I am editing there so not getting time to think of merger. So if I increased your workloads by any means Chinakpradhan ( talk) 17:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Draft:Anna Menon, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
-Toast (
talk)
17:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
At end of January you added in the section Nauka (ISS module)#Installation of outfitting equipment: " Another MLM outfitting called means of attachment of large payloads is scheduled to be delivered to Nauka by a Progress MS spacecraft." (You also added it as Future Components in Template:ISS modules)
Do you have a ref therefore? If yes, can you add the ref please.
Barny22 ( talk) 14:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
@ Barny22: it is on Anatoly's page as Insider content Chinakpradhan ( talk) 14:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
please never aim to remove this statement the most you will get of this equipment is name mention in web.@ Barny22:, and for that insider's content here's the ref http://www.russianspaceweb.com/iss-fgb2-mlm-integration.html this one is free It's probably in the insider's content of spacewalks 57 and 58. And so see so later spacewalks!! That's why limited refs Chinakpradhan ( talk) 18:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
OK I will do quickly Chinakpradhan ( talk) 19:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
@ Barny22: last time pinging you just to tell I have added the refs on Nauka (ISS module)#Installation of outfitting equipmentI don't think I need to add these anywhere else. Please tell if needed. Thank you. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 20:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you sir for the praise. will try to add more as I found on web.Have a nice day. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 21:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Matter is resolved @ Barny22: https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=23444.msg2356412#msg2356412 but please help me out once as to what color scheme should I use for non installed modules. I use black colour for the former modules but I dont see a distinguishable color scheme for non installed modules. Please suggest a colour scheme. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 01:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
@ Scottd521 can you please suggest a suitable colour for this please?? Chinakpradhan ( talk) 09:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the ref. I edited your cite to add the access date, because that web page gets updated a lot. An interested reader can use the access date to retrieve an archived copy of the web page as of the access date. - Arch dude ( talk) 13:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey, so I am going to rewrite the whole article with good sources, and I think that you maybe are interested about the topic as well. This is a part of the Wikipedia:Constellation program where we will do and get actual, concrete progress on spaceflight articles. Thoughts? CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 11:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't have time for starship already ginny and falcon 9 eats my head with ton of updates each time. However if I get time I will try my best but seriously I do almost negligible contribution to starship. @ CactiStaccingCrane Chinakpradhan ( talk) 15:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Ask zimzalabim @ CactiStaccingCrane Chinakpradhan ( talk) 16:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Ingenuity is way too perfect bro for any changes @ CactiStaccingCrane regarding any thing to be corrected is the problem with that bulky table for it the table is already in discussion to moved to a separate page on Ingenuity's talk page see there once. Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I think it must be removed till a page List of Ingenuity flights is made you can do creativity there ( I mean improvement) BTW instead of thinking of adding Ingenuity to that constellation program first think of changing the timeline of Mars 2020 page it had already got a unencyclopediac notice in a section due to more images and nobody tells what happened to Mars 2020 mission after one year on that page Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I tried but I got this notice Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
OK please then help out CactiStaccingCrane maybe it's has become bad article due to regular updates but I have tried my best. update for constructive works if you get time in future after starship and timeline of Mars 2020 Chinakpradhan ( talk) 08:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of space travelers by name, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Hines.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SpaceX Crew-4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Chinakpradhan! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Could you provide references if you're going to repeatedly share this information? Have not found anything apart from a Twitter thread claiming it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.97.232.200 ( talk) 00:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shenzhou 14, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chen Dong.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
SpaceX Crew-7, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (
t ·
c)
buidhe
13:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Artem.G ( talk) 18:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Thank you @ Artem.G Chinakpradhan ( talk) 01:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)