Hello, Chesivoirzr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot ( talk) 20:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Domain-specific learning may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Fowler's stages of faith development may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Distancing (psychology) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Co-sleeping. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Parenting styles with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — Frosty ☃ 01:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Addictive personality has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Agreeableness. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Psychology of religion, you may be
blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as
vandalism and have been automatically
reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:
Psychology of religion was
changed by
Chesivoirzr
(u)
(t) ANN scored at 0.946179 on 2014-10-08T03:00:51+00:00 . Thank you.
ClueBot NG (
talk)
03:00, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eccentricity (behavior) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loevinger's stages of ego development. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Erikson's stages of psychosocial development, you may be
blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as
vandalism and have been automatically
reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:
Erikson's stages of psychosocial development was
changed by
Chesivoirzr
(u)
(t) ANN scored at 0.905909 on 2014-10-13T03:47:22+00:00 . Thank you.
ClueBot NG (
talk)
03:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Chesivoirzr. I've started a thread concerning you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; a WP:Permalink for that thread is here. Flyer22 ( talk) 04:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Chesivoirzr. I saw the discussion of your editing at the administrators notice board and reviewed your edits and this page. You are not off to a good start here! First and most important thing -- the thing that makes Wikipedia work is that editors talk to each other. You don't seem to be aware that this is possible, or perhaps you are not aware it is necessary. It is! Every article has a Talk page, and this is your Talk page, where people can talk with you and you can talk back. If you need help with this process of talking, and with understanding why your edits are being rejected, please ask.
I also have to tell you that because discussion is so fundamental to everything we do here, editors who just refuse to discuss things and keep making edits that are rejected, get blocked or banned. So you do need to engage in discussion, if you want to retain your editing privileges (they are a privilege - one that is freely offered to all - and they can be revoked). Good luck! Jytdog ( talk) 10:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, this is Chesivoirzr, and I apologize for my unintentionally disruptive edits. Thank you very much for bringing the issue to my attention! I am fairly new to Wikipedia and I want to improve as an editor and I don't want to get banned from editing Wikipedia. I'm very sorry for what I have done and I want to improve at editing Wikipedia articles. I want to regain my editing privileges and make excellent contributions to Wikipedia. Thank you very much and have a great day! How could I regain my Wikipedia editing privileges? Last night, I re-examined the Student training seminar to improve my editing. I don't want my editing to be banned! I also apologize for my lack of communication on the Talk Page. Thank you very much! How could I improve at becoming a better editor? How could I avoid the mistakes I made? How could I get help from other editors on Wikipedia? I hope that we could reach a consensus on how I could improve my editing. I want us to resolve the problem in a civil and respectful manner.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chesivoirzr ( talk • contribs) 12:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge | |
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the
Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to
learn how to edit Wikipedia. |
from: ChamithN
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
ReferenceBot, thank you very much for bringing the mistake of my error in referencing to my attention. How could I fix the error I made on the article Nuclear family/ Chesivoirzr ( talk) 02:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Chesivoirzr
Hello, Chesivoirzr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot ( talk) 20:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Domain-specific learning may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Fowler's stages of faith development may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Distancing (psychology) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Co-sleeping. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Parenting styles with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — Frosty ☃ 01:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Addictive personality has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Agreeableness. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Psychology of religion, you may be
blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as
vandalism and have been automatically
reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:
Psychology of religion was
changed by
Chesivoirzr
(u)
(t) ANN scored at 0.946179 on 2014-10-08T03:00:51+00:00 . Thank you.
ClueBot NG (
talk)
03:00, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eccentricity (behavior) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loevinger's stages of ego development. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Erikson's stages of psychosocial development, you may be
blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as
vandalism and have been automatically
reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:
Erikson's stages of psychosocial development was
changed by
Chesivoirzr
(u)
(t) ANN scored at 0.905909 on 2014-10-13T03:47:22+00:00 . Thank you.
ClueBot NG (
talk)
03:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Chesivoirzr. I've started a thread concerning you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; a WP:Permalink for that thread is here. Flyer22 ( talk) 04:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Chesivoirzr. I saw the discussion of your editing at the administrators notice board and reviewed your edits and this page. You are not off to a good start here! First and most important thing -- the thing that makes Wikipedia work is that editors talk to each other. You don't seem to be aware that this is possible, or perhaps you are not aware it is necessary. It is! Every article has a Talk page, and this is your Talk page, where people can talk with you and you can talk back. If you need help with this process of talking, and with understanding why your edits are being rejected, please ask.
I also have to tell you that because discussion is so fundamental to everything we do here, editors who just refuse to discuss things and keep making edits that are rejected, get blocked or banned. So you do need to engage in discussion, if you want to retain your editing privileges (they are a privilege - one that is freely offered to all - and they can be revoked). Good luck! Jytdog ( talk) 10:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, this is Chesivoirzr, and I apologize for my unintentionally disruptive edits. Thank you very much for bringing the issue to my attention! I am fairly new to Wikipedia and I want to improve as an editor and I don't want to get banned from editing Wikipedia. I'm very sorry for what I have done and I want to improve at editing Wikipedia articles. I want to regain my editing privileges and make excellent contributions to Wikipedia. Thank you very much and have a great day! How could I regain my Wikipedia editing privileges? Last night, I re-examined the Student training seminar to improve my editing. I don't want my editing to be banned! I also apologize for my lack of communication on the Talk Page. Thank you very much! How could I improve at becoming a better editor? How could I avoid the mistakes I made? How could I get help from other editors on Wikipedia? I hope that we could reach a consensus on how I could improve my editing. I want us to resolve the problem in a civil and respectful manner.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chesivoirzr ( talk • contribs) 12:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge | |
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the
Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to
learn how to edit Wikipedia. |
from: ChamithN
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
ReferenceBot, thank you very much for bringing the mistake of my error in referencing to my attention. How could I fix the error I made on the article Nuclear family/ Chesivoirzr ( talk) 02:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Chesivoirzr