![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Hey can you upload a 27 second sample for " Dance in the Dark" at File:Danceinthedark.ogg? --Legolas (talk2me) 10:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
(Outdent)Oink is none other than Pink. Lol. I think more so than Interscope, Gaga is intelligent to understand the public's reactions towards her. Esp since the Alejandro video, though sparking rumours, did nothing to help the song on iTunes. Hence they realised that a backlash must have been forming from the oversaturation. The rest would actually do Gaga good. She doesnot look too healthy nowadays. I am scared about the Lupus thing. But then again, can't wait for this year's VMAs. "Bad Romance" has a huge chance of sweeping the ceremony. It has to, the best video of the last year. --Legolas (talk2me) 06:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Hey, regarding Tik Tok leaving them as separate articles would be best (i believe). Ive been digging through rules and guidelines and i have yet to find anything stating parodies must be included in the main article of the original song. The song itself passes notable song and merging would be such a pain. There is no coverage on the song itself, you said i could add a music video section to the article, but all of that would fall under WP:OR because i could not find any coverage on the video that are reliable sources. Rather then merging i would rather a banner at the top of the page to link to each other like tik tok has on Tick Tock (song) by Lemar or maybe even a section called parody and then link to the page. (if i can find enough coverage). (CK)Lakeshade✽ talk2me 22:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi -- do you think the pic here can be used to discuss the song as it is used elsewhwere? Specifically, in IDF Tick Tock, if we have further mention of the song there?-- Epeefleche ( talk) 22:21, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
I have re-inserted the peak-positions for larger markets like Japan's and Germany's back into the tables. But I would like to know the reason of your removal here. In case you don't know this, and I am guessing you don't, Ireland's music market is a very small market, Ireland and New Zealand they both have the same exact size of markets; in fact, they both have smaller markets than Austria. Whereas Japan has the second largest music market after US, and Germany the fourth largest market after US, Japan, UK. Please do not remove neither Japan's nor Germany's peaks and replace them with either Ireland's peak or US dance charts, the latter of which is not significant at all. Regards.-- Harout72 ( talk) 18:50, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
I personally think we don't have enough slots for anything like US dance charts. Replacing it with even New Zealand's peaks, wouldn't be a good idea. We should stick to official main charts of each market. I am more than certain that Eminem's discography page as well as others which have become FAs, have not achieved that due to having as many US peaks as we can list. I believe what matters for becoming a FA is how the general structure is and covering as many markets as possible with only 10 or maximum 11 slots.-- Harout72 ( talk) 21:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
No not at all, I know they are only easy to locate if you have specific instructions posted. The singles could be found here, it's the one on the left, but you would have to search for the peaks. I personally locate the Japanese peaks by translating each week's charts with this google translator. If you give me some time, I could locate the peaks for each single, unfortunately, it takes me some time since I don't read Japanese, and the names of all foreign artists are for some inexplicable reason posted with Japanese letters.-- Harout72 ( talk) 22:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Why do you keep insisting on using Ireland, is it because this is the English wiki and Ireland is an English speaking country? There are much bigger markets to cover before that. Wikipedia is all about covering as much information as possible. I am not saying to leave the Japan's peaks unverified. What's could be the harm in sourcing each peak individually, without the footnotes? However, if you really want to use something that can be verifiable more easily then in that case use Italy, here.-- Harout72 ( talk) 23:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chasewc91,
First, I want you know i'm really not good in english, i speak french. So, check this, it is a exemples for other discography who separate singles and featured singles. For Video Phone, it's a single, see the music video of the song and read the informations bellow.
Exemples of discography :
For Video Phone, read this :
More than one year after the album's release, "Video Phone" was released as the eighth and final single from the album with a music video and digital download release taking form of an extended remix featuring American electropop artist, Lady Gaga.
"Video Phone" (Remix featuring Lady Gaga)
The release was later recalled and in October 2009, Life & Style reported that Knowles and pop singer Lady Gaga were collaborating for a remixed version of the song.
Weel, I hope now you know Video Phone (extented remix) is a single and that in the discography, single and collaboration is in different sections.
Once again sorry for my bad english
Raphael99 (
talk)
21:14, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Congrats on the magnificent version of the Lady Gaga discography article. Superb job. — Legolas (talk2me) 03:48, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
(Outdent) Poor Harout. Don;t know why he gets so defensive. We are not being racist like that user in Talk:Lady Gaga. Ugh, the nerves. Btwn, I was talking about listing a dash in the references to make them appear more encyclopedic. I will show you one. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
(Outdent) Also we will have to deal with the recreation of The Cherrytree Sessions which will happen inevitably as reviews have come forward now. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Please be aware of WP:NOTCENSORED. I may swear if i want as long as i dont call you a name, which i didnt. So do not incorrectly warn me again. Thank you - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 00:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Actually, the image that you keep readding has loads of artifacts (especially around the eyes) that wasn't in the original. Blow it up and you'll see. Not much of an improvement. I'll redo it myself when I have a couple of minutes over. Nymf hideliho! 01:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chase, I really need a bit of help in this department. I would like to include those "Sound or audio file snippets" that are around 20-30 seconds that you could listen to on the albums page. I don't know how to find them, place them or use them for the matter. I have asked Legolas for his help but he isn't familiar with this kinda thing, so he referred me to you, so please help me. Thanks!-- PeterGriffin • Talk 04:01, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
i don't like the page i'm changing it back the way it was. if we have to keep playing this game fine with me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallstowalls90 ( talk • contribs) 02:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry for my bad english (i speak spanish). I wanna know where's the rule of the cronology because i really don't know and i need that to used on Wikipedia en Spanish.-- Trivia harrypotter ( talk) 04:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
A fine work my lad! I am so so much impressed. Sorry I did not log sooner and missed all the Lady Gaga discogrpahy 3RR drama. Its so much fun always to tackle disruptive editors! — Legolas (talk2me) 03:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I know daily news source says 15 million but the other source says that it is 13 million. On one of her recent shows Gaga was presented with a plaque celebrating her incredible sales of over 13 million albums and 51 million singles. I think this is the source we should keep. Sorry for my english. Thanks. Albes29 ( talk) 18:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Gaga actually has 2 featured singles. Chillin' and Video Phone (3 if Lick It becomes a single from T.I.'s album). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Within a dream ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
I know its not her single, neither is Chillin'. But the only released version of Video Phone is the version featuring Gaga, it is considered a featured single, so change it please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Within a dream ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
The Cherrytree Sessions at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
20:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 26 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Cherrytree Sessions, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Chase, its time that we clear up this piece of muck and bring it up the standards of WP:GAGA. The recent articles do bother me much, especially Hitmixes which frankly is a redundant. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, could you extend the review for a few days. School has started back so I'm all over the place right now. Thanks!! Candy o32 20:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Ive drawn up a new table at Talk:List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Justin_Bieber#Table_2.0. Let me know what you think and correct or inform me if ive made any errors. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
This has been discussed multiple times on different articles.
WP:ORDINAL states "As a general rule, in the body of an article, single-digit whole numbers from zero to nine are spelled out in words; numbers greater than nine are commonly rendered in numerals, or in words if they are expressed in one or two words (16 or sixteen, 84 or eighty-four, 200 or two hundred, but 3.75, 544, 21 million). This applies to ordinal numbers as well as cardinal numbers. However there are frequent exceptions to these rules." ... "# Comparable quantities should be all spelled out or all figures: we may write either 5 cats and 32 dogs or five cats and thirty-two dogs, not five cats and 32 dogs.
This means you must right numbers lower then 9 as nine, but if you follow that rule you cannot have 86 and nine, it must be eighty-six and nine. -
(CK)Lakeshade -
talk2me -
20:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
The key in this is it can be either. I write them in words because of rule one about numbers 1-9. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
which dead links? please let me know, thfank you :) Ifiwere ( talk) 20:07, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your slow and steady edit war you're currently engaged in on the Lady Gaga article. You and SnapSnap ( talk · contribs) have been at it for several days, and you have both been causing disruption to the article. Please discuss the genre issue on the talk page and gain consensus. Any further reverts will result in the temporary block of the editor(s) who persists their behavior despite this warning. — ξ xplicit 20:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
"The Fame Monster reached number five in the US, where it has sold over one million copies, and peaked at number one in Australia and New Zealand" Why not include how it chopped the British charts as well, being the second biggest market out there, and even Switzerland's like you did with The Fame. Just a suggestion, becuase in my opinion it will easily increase the readers understanding of how successful this album really is.-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 13:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tbhotch, I decided to add the publishers to the refs. For the non-print refs, I had to add the publishers as an extension to that already-occupied field, so could you please check to see if they're done correctly? And could you also elaborate on the "obvious" prose issues? Thanks. – Chase ( talk) 17:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Seems like the market is squirming with Gaga releases, every week. This one is horrid. — Legolas (talk2me) 03:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
r u serious ????????? the record label gave it to her !!!!!!!!!!! they not reliable ?? they know exactly how many gaga sold ...... why you try to argue ???!! you know what ? im going to complaine on you , i brought a source, you didnt , so you stop change it !!!!!!!!!!!!!! look at the video , you cant see ??? the lable know exactly how many gaga sold , not a lame news paper -- Bar17 ( talk) 23:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Im so drunk. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 03:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I thought the commons has only for non-free images? How would I correctly tag/license the cover art there? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Source/MTV Japan said, そんなレディー・ガガのアルバム『The Monster』から6曲目となる「モンスター」の着うた(R)、着うたフル(R)が10月1日に発売決定した。. Okay?-- 211.16.220.8 ( talk) 03:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I see "Poker Face"/"Speechless"/"Your Song" peaking at 13 on Bubbling Under Hot 100, one week total, February 20, 2010. - eo ( talk) 11:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey, can you please delete Talk:Animal (Kesha album)/GA2? I dont know what that user was doing. I dont plan on GA-ing this article for several months as shes re-releasing it in December and releasing like 4 more singles so GA would be extremely premature. I dont know why he created the page just to comment on it? =S - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 07:04, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
I think an image of Gaga performing would be more suitable for the article. What do you say? — Legolas (talk2me) 05:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you didn't try and teach me what's appropriate and what is not. Your constant enforcement of leaving the Japanese market out based on your claims of poor chart-performance is ludicrous as Eminem does and has charted well with his materials there. You and other editors (I will not name them) clearly seem to have a problem with Japan's market which subconsciously drives you to make incorrect decisions. And I would very much appreciate if you could stop doing that. Lastly, as I mentioned earlier, had I replaced a market with better positions than Japan's, that would have seemed a reason enough to discuss first. US R&B positions do not represent another market, therefore, there is no need to include them although some other discographies do include them. Regards.-- Harout72 ( talk) 23:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Please don't threaten me that you're going to report me. Where is your consensus? You're the one trying to edit-war with me. You must establish a consensus with me first, and then, we shall both agree to use R&B over Japan. Perhaps you should refer to WP:Consensus.-- Harout72 ( talk) 00:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I've only just noticed you reverted my edit of removing small market certs. I think there are too much, and the bigger market certs (US, UK, GER, AUS) show how successful she reallly is. I really think some need to be removed as i find there are too many AtomicMarcusKitten ( talk) 21:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I wanted to apologise if I came across as forceful. The way I see it 90% font size is a good idea but 100% would be the best idea. However progress is more important than stalling and the size can be revisited at a later date if need be. Do you at least understand the reasoning behind the other other changes going on? I don't want to fall out over this with anyone and so I'm willing to accept 90% font sizes if you really cannot bare 100%. It is a step forwards after all... -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 21:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am currently working on a new template for Hilary Duff discography; I have been looking through pages, and seen the contributions you have made to Dignity. I admire the worked put in (Good Job!... by the way) but i have a few points and contributions i would like to discuss...
Sincerly, Ifiwere ( talk) 05:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Chase, the article is now littered with overlinking. You should remove this as the article is a FL, and they shouldnt be there. — Legolas (talk2me) 09:06, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Looks like
we arrived to the same conclusion.
—
ξ
xplicit
21:09, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Please show me any Wikipedia guideline or policy that indicates that we can change the titles of works. To my mind, they are the equivalent of quotations: whether we like the title or not, it was the author's choice, not ours.— Kww( talk) 21:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chase, I was reading the comments on the proposed merger of the Justin Bieber awards article into the main article. Particularly, I noted your application of original research in the comments. Just want to say that NOR might have been applied incorrectly here, as it deals with material already physically published. If you interpreted NOR in the way that a person should express his or her views with citations given, no that's not needed and extraneously demanding on any person. Its like McCain saying he will reinforce traditional conservative values by quoting sociologists in his speeches. Intuition that something is likely to occur in the future works fine so long it makes sense and is not fringe theory. Some thoughts, thats it. Best, ANGCHENRUI Talk ♨ 12:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
If you have time, could you comment on the source issue here? Thanks in advance. Candy o32 02:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
i'm kinda confused. i thought that The Fame Monster was Lady Gaga's second album but it's coming up as an extended play. I have a strange feeling that this is wrong. Please reply. -- 184.46.59.108 ( talk) 03:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The WikiJaguar Award for Excellence | |
For your recent assistance responding to the discussion around The Fame Monster on my talk page, I award you the WikiJaguar Award for Excellence in talk page stalking efforts Adabow ( talk · contribs) 21:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC) |
Chase, since you know I am leaving, can I entrust you with the well-being and proper maintenance of the Gaga articles? I hope you have all of them on watchlist? — Legolas (talk2me) 09:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
the fame monster is an album. it's the fame with eight new songs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitalpopstar3000 ( talk • contribs) 01:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
I really don't care if i get blocked, like i've said already! XDD You're the one being snotty, so ill be horrible back :D Kthnxbye. AtomicMarcusKitten ( talk) 19:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
I can understand why you don't like the HTML formatting that I used, but why remove the notes? — Kww( talk) 00:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Could you weigh in on the discussion at Talk:Nelly 5.0 about the album cover? cheerz -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 00:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
right here -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 19:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
http://www.ladygaga.com/news/default.aspx?nid=25001
Paragraph 6:
"Lady Gaga is touring in support of The Fame Monster, which was released on November 23rd, 2009, by Streamline/Konlive/Cherrytree/Interscope. The album is the follow-up to 2008’s Grammy Award-winning album The Fame" - Her website
Wouldn't this quote make it official that it is her second studio album? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmmonsterrr2010 ( talk • contribs) 02:22, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chase, thanks for going to my talk page to talk about the issue. First of all, I had contacted FLC coordinator Dabomb87 about the issue and he told me that, he said it would be proper to wait until the FLC closes, and then ample time would allowed to convert to the new style. Also, the user who made the edits only converted the albums tables, with singles, featured singles, ocs, & more still in the old format. Candy o32 23:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chase, since you has been attacked many times by the same editor, I want to ask you to report the IP immediatly. The user is in fact CharlieJS13 ( talk · contribs) so you can report him at AIV for personal attacks and block evasion. Regards Tbhotch Talk C. 02:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chase. I've seen you and Dan56 are warring over piping Dance Music to either Electronic Dance Music or Dance-pop. In my view the article for Dance music speaks of music which often accompanies a dance and NOT the actual genre which is why we have often chosen to pipe the link to either Electronic dance music or dance-pop which are essentially the two main strands of dance music. I'm not sure if its ever been properly discussed or acknowledged anywhere. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:18, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
This issue has already come up with User:LilUnique at this talk, and a comprimise was made. If u decide to change this, u should make it open to a consensus, since "dance music" is often used by music writers (whose articles are often used as citations/sources for album articles/genres) to refer to (electronic) dance music. Seeing the article "Dance music" and its content, its obvious that is not what is referred to. Which is also why that article has a disambiguation hatnote at the top. But if it is to be changed for the article Flesh Tone, it should be by consensus/discussion, since this issue has been settled in the past once already. Dan56 ( talk) 23:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, could you point to me where it says extra album covers violates NFCC, I would like to cite it when removing such covers from articles. Please and thank you! Fixer23 ( talk) 08:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
You need a source to claim that it will be the next single. Just because it was released with the pre-order, doesn't mean a thing. For example, the same thing happened with " Woohoo" But since it was released to radio, it's considered a single. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 03:51, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I am not adding this to your page to debate with you, I'm just adding this to educate you. If you took the time to read the Talk:Pink Friday page and responded on there, than you would feel absolutely NO need to write ANYTHING on my talks. The discussion already takes place on the albums talk page, so keep it their. Further harassment will result in reporting and possible freezing. Thank you Theuhohreo ( talk) 21:06, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
it going on? What are the low down on the Gaga articles? — Legolas (talk2me) 04:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey is it just me that we should discuss the deletion of Monster again. After reading the past comments that supported the keep of the article they commonly emphasized the fact that they could construct this in to a good article, yet still nothing has really been added to make it become worthy of having its own article. And i personally believe that people will realize this and support the deletion, since nothing has been added to increase the quality of the article. (The single hasn't even charted significantly high which many reviewers thought it would)-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 01:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Lady Gaga song articles. Thank you. — Gavia immer ( talk) 12:55, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey! Seeing your comments in the "Monster" AfD, I was wondering if you could support my nomination for " I've Just Begun (Having My Fun)". Thank you! Xwomanizerx ( talk) 01:42, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
PLEASE if you see either IP starting with 86.1xx.xxx.xx, or
recently, or either IP user from the United Kingdom, making personal attacks revert him and report him at
WP:AIV as Block evasion
CharlieJS13 (
talk ·
contribs), please block him many days, his IPs still active
. Charlie is blocked from editing and he won't stop.
Tbhotch
Talk
C.
00:30, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
[5] Do you really think that 'thru' counts as a preposition in this circumstance? It is not an actual word, so isn't it a special case? Adabow ( talk · contribs) 22:31, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey :), please help reach consensus and vote here.-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 05:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Please participate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Why_Don't_You_Love_Me_(Beyonc%C3%A9_Knowles_song)#Single.3F Jivesh boodhun ( talk) 07:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Does this rule then apply to "I Ain't Thru"? If so, why isn't it changed? ---- JillFocker777 —Preceding unsigned comment added by JillFocker777 ( talk • contribs) 02:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for not notifying you; I thought you were watching the page. :) Adabow ( talk · contribs) 07:55, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
WP:NOTCENSORED does not apply to parental advisory stickers on albums. Covers without the stickers are preferred because it is an RIAA practice and thus, generally, they're US-centric and also (and more importantly) because they hide part of the cover. –Chase (talk / contribs) 22:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
That's a brilliant solution you made on The Fame Monster article. Thank you. IHelpWhenICan ( talk) 02:42, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello Chase! I saw your contribution to Dignity album. I thought maybe you could help me. Can you peer review Duff's So Yesterday for its improvement? Here it is— Link. Thanks.. Novice7 Talk 10:44, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
How come now you think it should be in the chronology?
I suggested that months ago ( Talk:The Fame#The Fame Monster in Chronology) and knocked down the idea quickly, yet now you change your mind. What gives? Just want to know :)-- Cprice1000 talk2me 16:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Please leave your comments here. Novice7 Talk 12:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Just because it posts one thing you cinsider fake, does not make it all fake. Also, maybe it was't fake; maybe just a small release. Mislabeled, perhaps? Also, consider the Ape Club site. -- Cprice1000 talk2me 23:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
What? 1. I was not referring to "Unusual You" 2. It is not "unpublished" as three sources state it is a single 3. Promo single is impossible, as it is a CD single
You stop removing it from the singles section when sources and consensus has reached it is a single. -- Cprice1000 talk2me 01:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Take a look here. Jivesh boodhun ( talk) 18:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi! The Mariah Carey WikiProject is now initiated! If you'd like to join, please add your name here. Thank you. Novice7 | Talk 09:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Hey can you upload a 27 second sample for " Dance in the Dark" at File:Danceinthedark.ogg? --Legolas (talk2me) 10:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
(Outdent)Oink is none other than Pink. Lol. I think more so than Interscope, Gaga is intelligent to understand the public's reactions towards her. Esp since the Alejandro video, though sparking rumours, did nothing to help the song on iTunes. Hence they realised that a backlash must have been forming from the oversaturation. The rest would actually do Gaga good. She doesnot look too healthy nowadays. I am scared about the Lupus thing. But then again, can't wait for this year's VMAs. "Bad Romance" has a huge chance of sweeping the ceremony. It has to, the best video of the last year. --Legolas (talk2me) 06:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Hey, regarding Tik Tok leaving them as separate articles would be best (i believe). Ive been digging through rules and guidelines and i have yet to find anything stating parodies must be included in the main article of the original song. The song itself passes notable song and merging would be such a pain. There is no coverage on the song itself, you said i could add a music video section to the article, but all of that would fall under WP:OR because i could not find any coverage on the video that are reliable sources. Rather then merging i would rather a banner at the top of the page to link to each other like tik tok has on Tick Tock (song) by Lemar or maybe even a section called parody and then link to the page. (if i can find enough coverage). (CK)Lakeshade✽ talk2me 22:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi -- do you think the pic here can be used to discuss the song as it is used elsewhwere? Specifically, in IDF Tick Tock, if we have further mention of the song there?-- Epeefleche ( talk) 22:21, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
I have re-inserted the peak-positions for larger markets like Japan's and Germany's back into the tables. But I would like to know the reason of your removal here. In case you don't know this, and I am guessing you don't, Ireland's music market is a very small market, Ireland and New Zealand they both have the same exact size of markets; in fact, they both have smaller markets than Austria. Whereas Japan has the second largest music market after US, and Germany the fourth largest market after US, Japan, UK. Please do not remove neither Japan's nor Germany's peaks and replace them with either Ireland's peak or US dance charts, the latter of which is not significant at all. Regards.-- Harout72 ( talk) 18:50, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
I personally think we don't have enough slots for anything like US dance charts. Replacing it with even New Zealand's peaks, wouldn't be a good idea. We should stick to official main charts of each market. I am more than certain that Eminem's discography page as well as others which have become FAs, have not achieved that due to having as many US peaks as we can list. I believe what matters for becoming a FA is how the general structure is and covering as many markets as possible with only 10 or maximum 11 slots.-- Harout72 ( talk) 21:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
No not at all, I know they are only easy to locate if you have specific instructions posted. The singles could be found here, it's the one on the left, but you would have to search for the peaks. I personally locate the Japanese peaks by translating each week's charts with this google translator. If you give me some time, I could locate the peaks for each single, unfortunately, it takes me some time since I don't read Japanese, and the names of all foreign artists are for some inexplicable reason posted with Japanese letters.-- Harout72 ( talk) 22:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Why do you keep insisting on using Ireland, is it because this is the English wiki and Ireland is an English speaking country? There are much bigger markets to cover before that. Wikipedia is all about covering as much information as possible. I am not saying to leave the Japan's peaks unverified. What's could be the harm in sourcing each peak individually, without the footnotes? However, if you really want to use something that can be verifiable more easily then in that case use Italy, here.-- Harout72 ( talk) 23:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chasewc91,
First, I want you know i'm really not good in english, i speak french. So, check this, it is a exemples for other discography who separate singles and featured singles. For Video Phone, it's a single, see the music video of the song and read the informations bellow.
Exemples of discography :
For Video Phone, read this :
More than one year after the album's release, "Video Phone" was released as the eighth and final single from the album with a music video and digital download release taking form of an extended remix featuring American electropop artist, Lady Gaga.
"Video Phone" (Remix featuring Lady Gaga)
The release was later recalled and in October 2009, Life & Style reported that Knowles and pop singer Lady Gaga were collaborating for a remixed version of the song.
Weel, I hope now you know Video Phone (extented remix) is a single and that in the discography, single and collaboration is in different sections.
Once again sorry for my bad english
Raphael99 (
talk)
21:14, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Congrats on the magnificent version of the Lady Gaga discography article. Superb job. — Legolas (talk2me) 03:48, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
(Outdent) Poor Harout. Don;t know why he gets so defensive. We are not being racist like that user in Talk:Lady Gaga. Ugh, the nerves. Btwn, I was talking about listing a dash in the references to make them appear more encyclopedic. I will show you one. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
(Outdent) Also we will have to deal with the recreation of The Cherrytree Sessions which will happen inevitably as reviews have come forward now. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Please be aware of WP:NOTCENSORED. I may swear if i want as long as i dont call you a name, which i didnt. So do not incorrectly warn me again. Thank you - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 00:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Actually, the image that you keep readding has loads of artifacts (especially around the eyes) that wasn't in the original. Blow it up and you'll see. Not much of an improvement. I'll redo it myself when I have a couple of minutes over. Nymf hideliho! 01:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chase, I really need a bit of help in this department. I would like to include those "Sound or audio file snippets" that are around 20-30 seconds that you could listen to on the albums page. I don't know how to find them, place them or use them for the matter. I have asked Legolas for his help but he isn't familiar with this kinda thing, so he referred me to you, so please help me. Thanks!-- PeterGriffin • Talk 04:01, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
i don't like the page i'm changing it back the way it was. if we have to keep playing this game fine with me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallstowalls90 ( talk • contribs) 02:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry for my bad english (i speak spanish). I wanna know where's the rule of the cronology because i really don't know and i need that to used on Wikipedia en Spanish.-- Trivia harrypotter ( talk) 04:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
A fine work my lad! I am so so much impressed. Sorry I did not log sooner and missed all the Lady Gaga discogrpahy 3RR drama. Its so much fun always to tackle disruptive editors! — Legolas (talk2me) 03:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I know daily news source says 15 million but the other source says that it is 13 million. On one of her recent shows Gaga was presented with a plaque celebrating her incredible sales of over 13 million albums and 51 million singles. I think this is the source we should keep. Sorry for my english. Thanks. Albes29 ( talk) 18:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Gaga actually has 2 featured singles. Chillin' and Video Phone (3 if Lick It becomes a single from T.I.'s album). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Within a dream ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
I know its not her single, neither is Chillin'. But the only released version of Video Phone is the version featuring Gaga, it is considered a featured single, so change it please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Within a dream ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
The Cherrytree Sessions at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
20:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 26 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Cherrytree Sessions, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Chase, its time that we clear up this piece of muck and bring it up the standards of WP:GAGA. The recent articles do bother me much, especially Hitmixes which frankly is a redundant. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, could you extend the review for a few days. School has started back so I'm all over the place right now. Thanks!! Candy o32 20:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Ive drawn up a new table at Talk:List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Justin_Bieber#Table_2.0. Let me know what you think and correct or inform me if ive made any errors. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
This has been discussed multiple times on different articles.
WP:ORDINAL states "As a general rule, in the body of an article, single-digit whole numbers from zero to nine are spelled out in words; numbers greater than nine are commonly rendered in numerals, or in words if they are expressed in one or two words (16 or sixteen, 84 or eighty-four, 200 or two hundred, but 3.75, 544, 21 million). This applies to ordinal numbers as well as cardinal numbers. However there are frequent exceptions to these rules." ... "# Comparable quantities should be all spelled out or all figures: we may write either 5 cats and 32 dogs or five cats and thirty-two dogs, not five cats and 32 dogs.
This means you must right numbers lower then 9 as nine, but if you follow that rule you cannot have 86 and nine, it must be eighty-six and nine. -
(CK)Lakeshade -
talk2me -
20:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
The key in this is it can be either. I write them in words because of rule one about numbers 1-9. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
which dead links? please let me know, thfank you :) Ifiwere ( talk) 20:07, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your slow and steady edit war you're currently engaged in on the Lady Gaga article. You and SnapSnap ( talk · contribs) have been at it for several days, and you have both been causing disruption to the article. Please discuss the genre issue on the talk page and gain consensus. Any further reverts will result in the temporary block of the editor(s) who persists their behavior despite this warning. — ξ xplicit 20:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
"The Fame Monster reached number five in the US, where it has sold over one million copies, and peaked at number one in Australia and New Zealand" Why not include how it chopped the British charts as well, being the second biggest market out there, and even Switzerland's like you did with The Fame. Just a suggestion, becuase in my opinion it will easily increase the readers understanding of how successful this album really is.-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 13:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tbhotch, I decided to add the publishers to the refs. For the non-print refs, I had to add the publishers as an extension to that already-occupied field, so could you please check to see if they're done correctly? And could you also elaborate on the "obvious" prose issues? Thanks. – Chase ( talk) 17:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Seems like the market is squirming with Gaga releases, every week. This one is horrid. — Legolas (talk2me) 03:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
r u serious ????????? the record label gave it to her !!!!!!!!!!! they not reliable ?? they know exactly how many gaga sold ...... why you try to argue ???!! you know what ? im going to complaine on you , i brought a source, you didnt , so you stop change it !!!!!!!!!!!!!! look at the video , you cant see ??? the lable know exactly how many gaga sold , not a lame news paper -- Bar17 ( talk) 23:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Im so drunk. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 03:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I thought the commons has only for non-free images? How would I correctly tag/license the cover art there? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Source/MTV Japan said, そんなレディー・ガガのアルバム『The Monster』から6曲目となる「モンスター」の着うた(R)、着うたフル(R)が10月1日に発売決定した。. Okay?-- 211.16.220.8 ( talk) 03:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I see "Poker Face"/"Speechless"/"Your Song" peaking at 13 on Bubbling Under Hot 100, one week total, February 20, 2010. - eo ( talk) 11:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey, can you please delete Talk:Animal (Kesha album)/GA2? I dont know what that user was doing. I dont plan on GA-ing this article for several months as shes re-releasing it in December and releasing like 4 more singles so GA would be extremely premature. I dont know why he created the page just to comment on it? =S - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 07:04, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
I think an image of Gaga performing would be more suitable for the article. What do you say? — Legolas (talk2me) 05:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you didn't try and teach me what's appropriate and what is not. Your constant enforcement of leaving the Japanese market out based on your claims of poor chart-performance is ludicrous as Eminem does and has charted well with his materials there. You and other editors (I will not name them) clearly seem to have a problem with Japan's market which subconsciously drives you to make incorrect decisions. And I would very much appreciate if you could stop doing that. Lastly, as I mentioned earlier, had I replaced a market with better positions than Japan's, that would have seemed a reason enough to discuss first. US R&B positions do not represent another market, therefore, there is no need to include them although some other discographies do include them. Regards.-- Harout72 ( talk) 23:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Please don't threaten me that you're going to report me. Where is your consensus? You're the one trying to edit-war with me. You must establish a consensus with me first, and then, we shall both agree to use R&B over Japan. Perhaps you should refer to WP:Consensus.-- Harout72 ( talk) 00:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I've only just noticed you reverted my edit of removing small market certs. I think there are too much, and the bigger market certs (US, UK, GER, AUS) show how successful she reallly is. I really think some need to be removed as i find there are too many AtomicMarcusKitten ( talk) 21:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I wanted to apologise if I came across as forceful. The way I see it 90% font size is a good idea but 100% would be the best idea. However progress is more important than stalling and the size can be revisited at a later date if need be. Do you at least understand the reasoning behind the other other changes going on? I don't want to fall out over this with anyone and so I'm willing to accept 90% font sizes if you really cannot bare 100%. It is a step forwards after all... -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 21:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am currently working on a new template for Hilary Duff discography; I have been looking through pages, and seen the contributions you have made to Dignity. I admire the worked put in (Good Job!... by the way) but i have a few points and contributions i would like to discuss...
Sincerly, Ifiwere ( talk) 05:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Chase, the article is now littered with overlinking. You should remove this as the article is a FL, and they shouldnt be there. — Legolas (talk2me) 09:06, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Looks like
we arrived to the same conclusion.
—
ξ
xplicit
21:09, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Please show me any Wikipedia guideline or policy that indicates that we can change the titles of works. To my mind, they are the equivalent of quotations: whether we like the title or not, it was the author's choice, not ours.— Kww( talk) 21:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chase, I was reading the comments on the proposed merger of the Justin Bieber awards article into the main article. Particularly, I noted your application of original research in the comments. Just want to say that NOR might have been applied incorrectly here, as it deals with material already physically published. If you interpreted NOR in the way that a person should express his or her views with citations given, no that's not needed and extraneously demanding on any person. Its like McCain saying he will reinforce traditional conservative values by quoting sociologists in his speeches. Intuition that something is likely to occur in the future works fine so long it makes sense and is not fringe theory. Some thoughts, thats it. Best, ANGCHENRUI Talk ♨ 12:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
If you have time, could you comment on the source issue here? Thanks in advance. Candy o32 02:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
i'm kinda confused. i thought that The Fame Monster was Lady Gaga's second album but it's coming up as an extended play. I have a strange feeling that this is wrong. Please reply. -- 184.46.59.108 ( talk) 03:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The WikiJaguar Award for Excellence | |
For your recent assistance responding to the discussion around The Fame Monster on my talk page, I award you the WikiJaguar Award for Excellence in talk page stalking efforts Adabow ( talk · contribs) 21:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC) |
Chase, since you know I am leaving, can I entrust you with the well-being and proper maintenance of the Gaga articles? I hope you have all of them on watchlist? — Legolas (talk2me) 09:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
the fame monster is an album. it's the fame with eight new songs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitalpopstar3000 ( talk • contribs) 01:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
I really don't care if i get blocked, like i've said already! XDD You're the one being snotty, so ill be horrible back :D Kthnxbye. AtomicMarcusKitten ( talk) 19:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
I can understand why you don't like the HTML formatting that I used, but why remove the notes? — Kww( talk) 00:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Could you weigh in on the discussion at Talk:Nelly 5.0 about the album cover? cheerz -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 00:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
right here -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 19:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
http://www.ladygaga.com/news/default.aspx?nid=25001
Paragraph 6:
"Lady Gaga is touring in support of The Fame Monster, which was released on November 23rd, 2009, by Streamline/Konlive/Cherrytree/Interscope. The album is the follow-up to 2008’s Grammy Award-winning album The Fame" - Her website
Wouldn't this quote make it official that it is her second studio album? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmmonsterrr2010 ( talk • contribs) 02:22, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chase, thanks for going to my talk page to talk about the issue. First of all, I had contacted FLC coordinator Dabomb87 about the issue and he told me that, he said it would be proper to wait until the FLC closes, and then ample time would allowed to convert to the new style. Also, the user who made the edits only converted the albums tables, with singles, featured singles, ocs, & more still in the old format. Candy o32 23:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chase, since you has been attacked many times by the same editor, I want to ask you to report the IP immediatly. The user is in fact CharlieJS13 ( talk · contribs) so you can report him at AIV for personal attacks and block evasion. Regards Tbhotch Talk C. 02:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Chase. I've seen you and Dan56 are warring over piping Dance Music to either Electronic Dance Music or Dance-pop. In my view the article for Dance music speaks of music which often accompanies a dance and NOT the actual genre which is why we have often chosen to pipe the link to either Electronic dance music or dance-pop which are essentially the two main strands of dance music. I'm not sure if its ever been properly discussed or acknowledged anywhere. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:18, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
This issue has already come up with User:LilUnique at this talk, and a comprimise was made. If u decide to change this, u should make it open to a consensus, since "dance music" is often used by music writers (whose articles are often used as citations/sources for album articles/genres) to refer to (electronic) dance music. Seeing the article "Dance music" and its content, its obvious that is not what is referred to. Which is also why that article has a disambiguation hatnote at the top. But if it is to be changed for the article Flesh Tone, it should be by consensus/discussion, since this issue has been settled in the past once already. Dan56 ( talk) 23:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, could you point to me where it says extra album covers violates NFCC, I would like to cite it when removing such covers from articles. Please and thank you! Fixer23 ( talk) 08:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
You need a source to claim that it will be the next single. Just because it was released with the pre-order, doesn't mean a thing. For example, the same thing happened with " Woohoo" But since it was released to radio, it's considered a single. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 03:51, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I am not adding this to your page to debate with you, I'm just adding this to educate you. If you took the time to read the Talk:Pink Friday page and responded on there, than you would feel absolutely NO need to write ANYTHING on my talks. The discussion already takes place on the albums talk page, so keep it their. Further harassment will result in reporting and possible freezing. Thank you Theuhohreo ( talk) 21:06, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
it going on? What are the low down on the Gaga articles? — Legolas (talk2me) 04:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey is it just me that we should discuss the deletion of Monster again. After reading the past comments that supported the keep of the article they commonly emphasized the fact that they could construct this in to a good article, yet still nothing has really been added to make it become worthy of having its own article. And i personally believe that people will realize this and support the deletion, since nothing has been added to increase the quality of the article. (The single hasn't even charted significantly high which many reviewers thought it would)-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 01:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Lady Gaga song articles. Thank you. — Gavia immer ( talk) 12:55, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey! Seeing your comments in the "Monster" AfD, I was wondering if you could support my nomination for " I've Just Begun (Having My Fun)". Thank you! Xwomanizerx ( talk) 01:42, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
PLEASE if you see either IP starting with 86.1xx.xxx.xx, or
recently, or either IP user from the United Kingdom, making personal attacks revert him and report him at
WP:AIV as Block evasion
CharlieJS13 (
talk ·
contribs), please block him many days, his IPs still active
. Charlie is blocked from editing and he won't stop.
Tbhotch
Talk
C.
00:30, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
[5] Do you really think that 'thru' counts as a preposition in this circumstance? It is not an actual word, so isn't it a special case? Adabow ( talk · contribs) 22:31, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey :), please help reach consensus and vote here.-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 05:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Please participate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Why_Don't_You_Love_Me_(Beyonc%C3%A9_Knowles_song)#Single.3F Jivesh boodhun ( talk) 07:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Does this rule then apply to "I Ain't Thru"? If so, why isn't it changed? ---- JillFocker777 —Preceding unsigned comment added by JillFocker777 ( talk • contribs) 02:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for not notifying you; I thought you were watching the page. :) Adabow ( talk · contribs) 07:55, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
WP:NOTCENSORED does not apply to parental advisory stickers on albums. Covers without the stickers are preferred because it is an RIAA practice and thus, generally, they're US-centric and also (and more importantly) because they hide part of the cover. –Chase (talk / contribs) 22:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
That's a brilliant solution you made on The Fame Monster article. Thank you. IHelpWhenICan ( talk) 02:42, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello Chase! I saw your contribution to Dignity album. I thought maybe you could help me. Can you peer review Duff's So Yesterday for its improvement? Here it is— Link. Thanks.. Novice7 Talk 10:44, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
How come now you think it should be in the chronology?
I suggested that months ago ( Talk:The Fame#The Fame Monster in Chronology) and knocked down the idea quickly, yet now you change your mind. What gives? Just want to know :)-- Cprice1000 talk2me 16:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Please leave your comments here. Novice7 Talk 12:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Just because it posts one thing you cinsider fake, does not make it all fake. Also, maybe it was't fake; maybe just a small release. Mislabeled, perhaps? Also, consider the Ape Club site. -- Cprice1000 talk2me 23:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
What? 1. I was not referring to "Unusual You" 2. It is not "unpublished" as three sources state it is a single 3. Promo single is impossible, as it is a CD single
You stop removing it from the singles section when sources and consensus has reached it is a single. -- Cprice1000 talk2me 01:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Take a look here. Jivesh boodhun ( talk) 18:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi! The Mariah Carey WikiProject is now initiated! If you'd like to join, please add your name here. Thank you. Novice7 | Talk 09:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |