![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
hi can you review my articles/drafts? Danieleb82 ( talk) 18:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
@
Danieleb82: Done. I have added other source for you besides what are on the pages. Pls added content that not only from primary source (such as what the band members commented on their songs but review and other info from independent source about the songs, media reception, tour, other artist cover the songs, commercial success,in popular culture, live performance, charting and etc. - See
You've Got Another Thing Comin' and
Living After Midnight for reference. Thank you for the contribution.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
02:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Friend Award | |
You gave advice and help to me. Told me about citing articles and encourage me to participate TWA. Please give me advice in future also PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 13:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC) |
Hi there! You seem to have moved the page regarding smart displays to a draft version for valid reasons. Since I'm not an administrator, I can't stop you. I created the page as a side note, and was used in the Google Assistant page. The page did not exist, so I created it to fill its place. The article is in need of expansion, but I just wanted to let you know about the page's use. Since then, redirects have been made, and Smart displays now redirects to the draft. Thanks for understanding! Garretttehrobloxplayer ( talk) 22:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks a lot for your review on the article page BMW HP4 Race! I see that this page has been reviewed twice! I have started approx. half dozen articles and this is the first time that an article I wrote is reviewed twice. Anyway, thanks again for your kind review. Keep up the good work. - Navinsingh133 ( talk) 12:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Reviewer Barnstar | |
This is for reviewing new articles in Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 03:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Guidance Barnstar | |
This for your guidance given to me about sources and citing. Thank you. PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 03:11, 7 April 2018 (UTC) |
/info/en/?search=Mike_Jackson_(fighter) I dont get, i improved the notability and still gave me the tag, how do remove. I see them on pages many times or even year... 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs) 05:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Greetings, Sir, please review my articles which I have added sources. Kollam Orthodox Diocese, Adoor Kadampanad Orthodox Diocese, Kottayam Orthodox Diocese, Thumpamon Orthodox Diocese, Kottayam Central Orthodox Diocese, Kochi Orthodox Diocese. PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 06:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Cassiopeia, thank you for your message. Just to clarify: the content I deleted was clearly redundant. The page read: "...Brown pulled out of the fight... and was replaced by Alex Oliveira.[5][6] Brown is replaced by Alex Oliveira.[7]" The citings numbered [6] and [7] both referred to the same article. My explanatory note was: "delete redundant sentence and citing." With such a clear redundancy, this explanation must surely be adequate. So yes, I think it was a mistake to undo my edit. However I do see that someone else has also now fixed the redundancy, and I am hoping that the sentence remains for now as WWEFan1926 left it. I hope you will agree that there is no reason for it to say "Brown is replaced by Oliveira" twice in a row. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.243.208 ( talk) 17:26, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
So Brain Oretga will be facing the New Lightweight Champion Khabib (or Al.. or Feather Champion Max Holloway? 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lucie Pudilová, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
@ CASSIOPEIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Max_Holloway&oldid=833758706 Obvious Dispute that flagged the wrong user(s) for Vandalism/TW without reviewing. Max Halloway is indeed 155lbs according to UFC.com ( http://www.ufc.com/event/UFC-223 ) 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
I think someone removed my Max Holloway Picture on Max Holloway Wikapedia page...the picture still there (no rules broken), but i cant see any reason it was removed. 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your edit. But sir iam citing source but you edited it very fast. The fact is that there is two types of editing, source and visual editing. So i am writing in source but citing in source is very hard so i tried to switch to visual editing but it said that you have to save the source edit first so i saved it. Then i tried very fast to cite source in visual editing but you edited in seconds. So please don't block me because i am not doing it on any personal thing. I think that is the necessary information which should be on wikipedia page of fantastic beasts. Thank you Uchihaitachina ( talk) 10:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC) Uchihaitachina ( talk) 10:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello CASSIOPEIA. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of PM2FGI, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A radio-station is sufficient to pass WP:CCSI.The appropriate criterion is G11. Thank you. ~ Winged Blades Godric 06:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
CASSIOPEIA Added a reference to the proposals from the LGBCE for the new wards - I wasn't aware pages could be set as drafts, otherwise I would've done that in the first place! Trimfrim20 ( talk) 14:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Why did you say that I did not provide a reliable source? I said that 3 new shows are coming to this TV. -- 2601:205:C100:424D:71BE:3B8C:39A8:ADD4 ( talk) 03:39, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm not sure this is what you meant to do...-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award | |
For over 1000 new page reviews in the last year, thank you very much for your help at New Pages Patrol! — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 00:02, 14 April 2018 (UTC) |
Hi I couldn't find any sources. I just watched it happen live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NikkCartwright ( talk • contribs) 09:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for your kind reply. I think it should be done now, I have added inline citations that's related to the change of the stadium of the club this season.
The news about warren masilmony engagement is false. There are a lot of articles by Dalljiet which clearly states that this man has falsely given this article and has purposefully added this information on wikipedia to harm Dalljiet kaurs personal and professional life. He has set it on auto restore mode so that he gets publicity out of this false information. She has given articles and confirmed stating they never got engaged. [[User:Mumbai branch| Mumbai branch ( talk) 5:36 pm, Today (UTC+10)
Thanks for the many helpful adjustments and improvements on this new page.
I just added nearly 20 links so that passages in the story now connect to relevant Wikipedia pages. These new links cover everything from business terms (metrics, normalization, etc.) to countries (India, Brazil, etc.) to corporate-culture oddities (bouldering, fire pits, etc.)
I think this takes care of the (rightfully flagged) concern that the entry was underlinked. So I took the liberty of removing the underlinked tag. If you've got time to revisit the page and make sure that everything is as it should be, that's appreciated. At the very least, I wanted to let you know that your adirective has been quickly acted upon. GCA10 ( talk) 04:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I don't know how to provide the source of my changes to this article. Chicagorick38 ( talk) 08:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
I've sent a link for my changes to this article to wiki@wikimedia.org via my gmail acct. Chicagorick38 ( talk) 08:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
I've just seen the template added to this article. Two questions Regarding the additional references: I can certainly provide additionnal references. Those references would be the reference given by the only current reference (Pin's Mathematical Foundations of Automata Theory). Is it useful that I add to wikipedia other references, when those references can easily be found using the already given reference ? Regarding inline citation. Can someone give me an example of inline citation in a definition ? Because this article is mainly about two equivalent definitions of the same objects. And since those two definitions are given in the same book, it seems that any inline reference would be a repetition of the same book over and over. At best, I could indicate the page for each part of the definition. Does it present any interest ? Formally speaking, there are also examples in this article. However, even those examples come from the same book. Note that the «expert needed» box requires «Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article». I won't add the reason myself, I don't know it. CASSIOPEIA ( talk · contribs), since you did add this box, can you please add a reason to it ? Arthur MILCHIOR ( talk) 3:37 am, Today (UTC+10)
Thanks for your kind reply. I have rewritten the piece and added related inline citations. Can you review and restore the page.
No problem on that. I just created reference tags for them. It was clogging up references by having the same thing listed twice. So a double reference source would work fine. Udar55 ( talk) 23:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Please take care not to add {{ stub}} to an article like Pulaparthi Ramanjaneyulu which already has a specific stub tag. (On the other hand there was a lot else which needed fixing in that article: I moved it to a new title, made a redirect from his alternate name, fixed the incorrect sort key, mended the broken reference, sorted out the redlinked category). Pam D 08:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Amazing |
Thank you so much for your wonderful edits on the 27 club graffiti, Cassiopeia!!! Forever Art ( talk) 09:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC) |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Publish
. This button now also shows an
ellipsis. This is to show that pressing Publish
is not the last step.
[12]Changes later this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I apologize for not being very practical with wikipedia. Unfortunately I am not able to cite a source, because poetry is simply played in the movie. The source, or the proof, is the movie itself. So, maybe it's right to have it removed, if it's uncorrect by Wikipedia parameters. Thank you
@ 46.102.112.208: Good day. Thank your for the message above. Understand that you did not have source as the poetry was played in the movie. However, Wikipedia policy is that all content added/edited in the page/article need to support by independent reliable source. You are welcome to added it back if you could find the source to support it. Happy editing and let me know if anything else I could help you. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 01:42, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
The page, in it's current form, is terrible. I recognize that. But, you added 6 maintenance tags and 10 "citation needed" tags to it. I have a few issues with that which I'd like to bring up. Firstly, and the main one, it's overtagging ( WP:OVERTAG). At least use {{multiple issues}} when you add that many tags. Second, the article has absolutely no sources, so tagging every other line of text with {{cn}} is excessive and likely discouraging to the editor who created the page. Not only this, you also added an "unsourced section" tag into both sections. The article, after you had finished with it, looked like this. I noticed that you spread it out over 4 edits (a few minutes apart), the first 3 being additions of maintenance tags individually, which I found a bit strange but not especially concerning. Pinging Ringerfan23 for comment. Please be aware I do not intend this message to be uncivil, and have tried to ensure that no wording in it might be perceived as such. Vermont ( talk) 21:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
"When I start tagging citation needed, they usually respond with "thank message" and provide the inline citations as it need to be."means? Thanks, Vermont ( talk) 00:14, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Your participation in this conversation would be helpful. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 12:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
I do not understand the "expert needed" tag since there was nothing added to my talk page about this. If you mean an expert on the subject matter, then I will unabashedly tell you that I'm it having collected and proved most of the key identities in the first section in my own reasearch. I understand that the introduction needs to be more formally re-written. I will handle this. However, I disagree about the lack of inline references. Please respond on my talk page! Maxie ( talk) 01:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Maxieds: Greetings to you and thank you for the questions above. Please see the below
(A) inline citation needed - If you have done your research then the source need to be included on the body text with inline citations.
Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs needs "inline citation" from independent "third party" reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). (Note: Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR).
Instructions: Citing source from web - Do not copy and past the URL address and paste into the body text, but click "cite" on menu page and fill in the fields as per the Template: cite web and save when it is done). Examples below:
(note: remove nowiki tag when input the citation. Fill the info and change the date as needed. See on source edit view mode.)
(B) Expert Needed - As this is a mathematics/scientific article, the tag for "expert needed" is for other Wikipedians who are the subject matter to run through the article rightness of the equations/formulas/functions claimed in the article.
Thank you. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 01:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
equals_to_any
. You can use it to check if its first argument is equal (===
) to any of the following ones. For example you can use it to check if the page's namespace is amongst a given set of values in a more compact way than you could earlier. You can
read more on mediawiki.org.Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
hi can you review my articles/drafts? Danieleb82 ( talk) 18:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
@
Danieleb82: Done. I have added other source for you besides what are on the pages. Pls added content that not only from primary source (such as what the band members commented on their songs but review and other info from independent source about the songs, media reception, tour, other artist cover the songs, commercial success,in popular culture, live performance, charting and etc. - See
You've Got Another Thing Comin' and
Living After Midnight for reference. Thank you for the contribution.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
02:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Friend Award | |
You gave advice and help to me. Told me about citing articles and encourage me to participate TWA. Please give me advice in future also PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 13:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC) |
Hi there! You seem to have moved the page regarding smart displays to a draft version for valid reasons. Since I'm not an administrator, I can't stop you. I created the page as a side note, and was used in the Google Assistant page. The page did not exist, so I created it to fill its place. The article is in need of expansion, but I just wanted to let you know about the page's use. Since then, redirects have been made, and Smart displays now redirects to the draft. Thanks for understanding! Garretttehrobloxplayer ( talk) 22:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks a lot for your review on the article page BMW HP4 Race! I see that this page has been reviewed twice! I have started approx. half dozen articles and this is the first time that an article I wrote is reviewed twice. Anyway, thanks again for your kind review. Keep up the good work. - Navinsingh133 ( talk) 12:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Reviewer Barnstar | |
This is for reviewing new articles in Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 03:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Guidance Barnstar | |
This for your guidance given to me about sources and citing. Thank you. PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 03:11, 7 April 2018 (UTC) |
/info/en/?search=Mike_Jackson_(fighter) I dont get, i improved the notability and still gave me the tag, how do remove. I see them on pages many times or even year... 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs) 05:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Greetings, Sir, please review my articles which I have added sources. Kollam Orthodox Diocese, Adoor Kadampanad Orthodox Diocese, Kottayam Orthodox Diocese, Thumpamon Orthodox Diocese, Kottayam Central Orthodox Diocese, Kochi Orthodox Diocese. PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 06:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Cassiopeia, thank you for your message. Just to clarify: the content I deleted was clearly redundant. The page read: "...Brown pulled out of the fight... and was replaced by Alex Oliveira.[5][6] Brown is replaced by Alex Oliveira.[7]" The citings numbered [6] and [7] both referred to the same article. My explanatory note was: "delete redundant sentence and citing." With such a clear redundancy, this explanation must surely be adequate. So yes, I think it was a mistake to undo my edit. However I do see that someone else has also now fixed the redundancy, and I am hoping that the sentence remains for now as WWEFan1926 left it. I hope you will agree that there is no reason for it to say "Brown is replaced by Oliveira" twice in a row. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.243.208 ( talk) 17:26, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
So Brain Oretga will be facing the New Lightweight Champion Khabib (or Al.. or Feather Champion Max Holloway? 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lucie Pudilová, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
@ CASSIOPEIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Max_Holloway&oldid=833758706 Obvious Dispute that flagged the wrong user(s) for Vandalism/TW without reviewing. Max Halloway is indeed 155lbs according to UFC.com ( http://www.ufc.com/event/UFC-223 ) 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
I think someone removed my Max Holloway Picture on Max Holloway Wikapedia page...the picture still there (no rules broken), but i cant see any reason it was removed. 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your edit. But sir iam citing source but you edited it very fast. The fact is that there is two types of editing, source and visual editing. So i am writing in source but citing in source is very hard so i tried to switch to visual editing but it said that you have to save the source edit first so i saved it. Then i tried very fast to cite source in visual editing but you edited in seconds. So please don't block me because i am not doing it on any personal thing. I think that is the necessary information which should be on wikipedia page of fantastic beasts. Thank you Uchihaitachina ( talk) 10:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC) Uchihaitachina ( talk) 10:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello CASSIOPEIA. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of PM2FGI, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A radio-station is sufficient to pass WP:CCSI.The appropriate criterion is G11. Thank you. ~ Winged Blades Godric 06:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
CASSIOPEIA Added a reference to the proposals from the LGBCE for the new wards - I wasn't aware pages could be set as drafts, otherwise I would've done that in the first place! Trimfrim20 ( talk) 14:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Why did you say that I did not provide a reliable source? I said that 3 new shows are coming to this TV. -- 2601:205:C100:424D:71BE:3B8C:39A8:ADD4 ( talk) 03:39, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm not sure this is what you meant to do...-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award | |
For over 1000 new page reviews in the last year, thank you very much for your help at New Pages Patrol! — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 00:02, 14 April 2018 (UTC) |
Hi I couldn't find any sources. I just watched it happen live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NikkCartwright ( talk • contribs) 09:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for your kind reply. I think it should be done now, I have added inline citations that's related to the change of the stadium of the club this season.
The news about warren masilmony engagement is false. There are a lot of articles by Dalljiet which clearly states that this man has falsely given this article and has purposefully added this information on wikipedia to harm Dalljiet kaurs personal and professional life. He has set it on auto restore mode so that he gets publicity out of this false information. She has given articles and confirmed stating they never got engaged. [[User:Mumbai branch| Mumbai branch ( talk) 5:36 pm, Today (UTC+10)
Thanks for the many helpful adjustments and improvements on this new page.
I just added nearly 20 links so that passages in the story now connect to relevant Wikipedia pages. These new links cover everything from business terms (metrics, normalization, etc.) to countries (India, Brazil, etc.) to corporate-culture oddities (bouldering, fire pits, etc.)
I think this takes care of the (rightfully flagged) concern that the entry was underlinked. So I took the liberty of removing the underlinked tag. If you've got time to revisit the page and make sure that everything is as it should be, that's appreciated. At the very least, I wanted to let you know that your adirective has been quickly acted upon. GCA10 ( talk) 04:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I don't know how to provide the source of my changes to this article. Chicagorick38 ( talk) 08:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
I've sent a link for my changes to this article to wiki@wikimedia.org via my gmail acct. Chicagorick38 ( talk) 08:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
I've just seen the template added to this article. Two questions Regarding the additional references: I can certainly provide additionnal references. Those references would be the reference given by the only current reference (Pin's Mathematical Foundations of Automata Theory). Is it useful that I add to wikipedia other references, when those references can easily be found using the already given reference ? Regarding inline citation. Can someone give me an example of inline citation in a definition ? Because this article is mainly about two equivalent definitions of the same objects. And since those two definitions are given in the same book, it seems that any inline reference would be a repetition of the same book over and over. At best, I could indicate the page for each part of the definition. Does it present any interest ? Formally speaking, there are also examples in this article. However, even those examples come from the same book. Note that the «expert needed» box requires «Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article». I won't add the reason myself, I don't know it. CASSIOPEIA ( talk · contribs), since you did add this box, can you please add a reason to it ? Arthur MILCHIOR ( talk) 3:37 am, Today (UTC+10)
Thanks for your kind reply. I have rewritten the piece and added related inline citations. Can you review and restore the page.
No problem on that. I just created reference tags for them. It was clogging up references by having the same thing listed twice. So a double reference source would work fine. Udar55 ( talk) 23:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Please take care not to add {{ stub}} to an article like Pulaparthi Ramanjaneyulu which already has a specific stub tag. (On the other hand there was a lot else which needed fixing in that article: I moved it to a new title, made a redirect from his alternate name, fixed the incorrect sort key, mended the broken reference, sorted out the redlinked category). Pam D 08:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Amazing |
Thank you so much for your wonderful edits on the 27 club graffiti, Cassiopeia!!! Forever Art ( talk) 09:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC) |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Publish
. This button now also shows an
ellipsis. This is to show that pressing Publish
is not the last step.
[12]Changes later this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I apologize for not being very practical with wikipedia. Unfortunately I am not able to cite a source, because poetry is simply played in the movie. The source, or the proof, is the movie itself. So, maybe it's right to have it removed, if it's uncorrect by Wikipedia parameters. Thank you
@ 46.102.112.208: Good day. Thank your for the message above. Understand that you did not have source as the poetry was played in the movie. However, Wikipedia policy is that all content added/edited in the page/article need to support by independent reliable source. You are welcome to added it back if you could find the source to support it. Happy editing and let me know if anything else I could help you. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 01:42, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
The page, in it's current form, is terrible. I recognize that. But, you added 6 maintenance tags and 10 "citation needed" tags to it. I have a few issues with that which I'd like to bring up. Firstly, and the main one, it's overtagging ( WP:OVERTAG). At least use {{multiple issues}} when you add that many tags. Second, the article has absolutely no sources, so tagging every other line of text with {{cn}} is excessive and likely discouraging to the editor who created the page. Not only this, you also added an "unsourced section" tag into both sections. The article, after you had finished with it, looked like this. I noticed that you spread it out over 4 edits (a few minutes apart), the first 3 being additions of maintenance tags individually, which I found a bit strange but not especially concerning. Pinging Ringerfan23 for comment. Please be aware I do not intend this message to be uncivil, and have tried to ensure that no wording in it might be perceived as such. Vermont ( talk) 21:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
"When I start tagging citation needed, they usually respond with "thank message" and provide the inline citations as it need to be."means? Thanks, Vermont ( talk) 00:14, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Your participation in this conversation would be helpful. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 12:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
I do not understand the "expert needed" tag since there was nothing added to my talk page about this. If you mean an expert on the subject matter, then I will unabashedly tell you that I'm it having collected and proved most of the key identities in the first section in my own reasearch. I understand that the introduction needs to be more formally re-written. I will handle this. However, I disagree about the lack of inline references. Please respond on my talk page! Maxie ( talk) 01:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Maxieds: Greetings to you and thank you for the questions above. Please see the below
(A) inline citation needed - If you have done your research then the source need to be included on the body text with inline citations.
Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs needs "inline citation" from independent "third party" reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). (Note: Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR).
Instructions: Citing source from web - Do not copy and past the URL address and paste into the body text, but click "cite" on menu page and fill in the fields as per the Template: cite web and save when it is done). Examples below:
(note: remove nowiki tag when input the citation. Fill the info and change the date as needed. See on source edit view mode.)
(B) Expert Needed - As this is a mathematics/scientific article, the tag for "expert needed" is for other Wikipedians who are the subject matter to run through the article rightness of the equations/formulas/functions claimed in the article.
Thank you. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 01:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
equals_to_any
. You can use it to check if its first argument is equal (===
) to any of the following ones. For example you can use it to check if the page's namespace is amongst a given set of values in a more compact way than you could earlier. You can
read more on mediawiki.org.Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)