Per this comment. This is an encyclopedia. If you want to type lots of swear words over and over again, there are plenty of websites where you can do so; this isn't one of them. Thanks. Black Kite (t) (c) 01:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Ok thank you very much. Carolyn Baker III ( talk) 01:19, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Please do not create sock puppets again, as you did with User:Bunkerdiver, whom I just blocked. Consider this your only warning; if you continue to abuse multiple accounts, then you will be blocked for sock puppetry. Regards, – MuZemike 01:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sarujo ( talk) 02:17, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Carolyn Baker III. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sarujo ( talk) 07:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Your userpage, including the comment that your "int" (which most people will assume means "IQ") is 89, will show up in Google searches for your name. I strongly recommend that you delete this immediately. In fact, given that we have no way of knowing that you are in fact Carolyn Baker III and you could potentially be someone who dislikes her, I may very well feel constrained to delete this comment myself if you do not. Please respond here promptly. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 02:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Clear heels, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found
here. Thank you.
—
Gfoley
4
Wanna chat?
01:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Clear heels. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. The reverted edit can be found
here. Thank you.
—
Gfoley
4
Wanna chat?
01:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)I have raised the issue of this redirect here Log/2010 November 8 . Thanks. Fainites barley scribs 16:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Please work in the page in sandbox space (e.g. at User:Carolyn Baker III/Sexual imperialism. Articles can't be in articlespace until they're complete. Thanks. Bearcat ( talk) 02:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Your comment is requested back at the WQA. I would suggest that you answer the question and not try to avoid them. Thank you. Sarujo ( talk) 20:46, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Excuse you but I haven't been hounding you, this is the first time I've actually come to regarding your delay. And no, this is a serious issue that can only be resolved by your full cooperation with the admins. You're walking a thin line right now, so it's best that follow along. As there's no telling what may become of you. You were asked a question, so it's in your best interest to respond back at WQA. Sarujo ( talk) 23:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. If you have a serious concern that an editor is sockpuppeting with an IP, including double voting, I would suggest filing a report at WP:SPI (rather than edit warring on his talkpage!) Fainites barley scribs 22:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Per this comment. This is an encyclopedia. If you want to type lots of swear words over and over again, there are plenty of websites where you can do so; this isn't one of them. Thanks. Black Kite (t) (c) 01:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Ok thank you very much. Carolyn Baker III ( talk) 01:19, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Please do not create sock puppets again, as you did with User:Bunkerdiver, whom I just blocked. Consider this your only warning; if you continue to abuse multiple accounts, then you will be blocked for sock puppetry. Regards, – MuZemike 01:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sarujo ( talk) 02:17, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Carolyn Baker III. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sarujo ( talk) 07:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Your userpage, including the comment that your "int" (which most people will assume means "IQ") is 89, will show up in Google searches for your name. I strongly recommend that you delete this immediately. In fact, given that we have no way of knowing that you are in fact Carolyn Baker III and you could potentially be someone who dislikes her, I may very well feel constrained to delete this comment myself if you do not. Please respond here promptly. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 02:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Clear heels, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found
here. Thank you.
—
Gfoley
4
Wanna chat?
01:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Clear heels. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. The reverted edit can be found
here. Thank you.
—
Gfoley
4
Wanna chat?
01:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)I have raised the issue of this redirect here Log/2010 November 8 . Thanks. Fainites barley scribs 16:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Please work in the page in sandbox space (e.g. at User:Carolyn Baker III/Sexual imperialism. Articles can't be in articlespace until they're complete. Thanks. Bearcat ( talk) 02:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Your comment is requested back at the WQA. I would suggest that you answer the question and not try to avoid them. Thank you. Sarujo ( talk) 20:46, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Excuse you but I haven't been hounding you, this is the first time I've actually come to regarding your delay. And no, this is a serious issue that can only be resolved by your full cooperation with the admins. You're walking a thin line right now, so it's best that follow along. As there's no telling what may become of you. You were asked a question, so it's in your best interest to respond back at WQA. Sarujo ( talk) 23:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. If you have a serious concern that an editor is sockpuppeting with an IP, including double voting, I would suggest filing a report at WP:SPI (rather than edit warring on his talkpage!) Fainites barley scribs 22:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)