|
I have deleted this information as it was: unsolicited; in the wrong place; and falls foul of WP:BLP.
Thanks for editing the article "Hank Skinner". I had started this article several years ago and it has now grown up a lot. I live in Panama and I am also teaching English. With my students, we often publish articles, mostly in Spanish but sometimes we create some in English, and I would be glad to submit them to you for review: For instance this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peristeria_elata or this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopoldo_Fern%C3%A1ndez_%28Cuban_humorist%29 Have a nice week. We are all interested in making Wikipedia better. -- Adumoul ( talk) 12:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
When welcoming people on Wikipedia with a blank user talk page, be sure to check to see whether they are actually new or not--the easiest way is to see if their talk page has a "History" tab in the upper right corner. User:Neptunekh2, for instance, has about 8 times more edits than you do yourself; however, they have a tendency to blank their user pages after they've read messages. Just a tip for the future--thanks for your work on Wikipedia. Qwyrxian ( talk) 16:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1. I just wanted to say the this link says Eli Wallach has polish and Jewish ancestry: http://www.nndb.com/people/735/000022669/ Should that be noted in his article? Thanks! 2. Would it be ok to list Alyson_Hannigan under Category:American_people_of_Jewish_descent since it says she is Jewish on her mother's side? 3. Also is it ok to list Josh_Keaton under Category:American_people_of_Peruvian-Jewish_descent since his parents are both Peruvian and Jewish? Please give your opinions on these questions. Neptunekh2 ( talk) 12:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Captain Screebo, I just clipped some of your text from your entry on the mojo gurus as it violates quite a few guidelines. (just to name a couple). Even if the gentleman you responded to is not who he says he is, it doesn't matter. Please don't repost that. Thanks 16:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello Captain Screebo. You appear to have violated 3RR, per WP:AN3#User:Captain Screebo reported by Mtking (talk) (Result: ). If you would add a comment there and agree to take a break from the article from a period of time (e.g. one week), and from any other articles about Strauss-Kahn, an admin might close the report with no action. EdJohnston ( talk) 16:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See here. FatTrebla ( talk) 10:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
The age of Chibiusa of Sailor_Moon in the manga should be mentioned in her article. I found a source that talks about her different ages in manga: Chibiusa goes through several different designs in the manga as she grows up, but she's almost always wearing some school uniform or another. She's also unusually short for her age, a point that you notice when she hangs around with anyone from her class. When Chibiusa first shows up she's in fourth grade at Juuban Elementary. During the Death Buster's arc she's elected class president of the fifth grade, and at the beginning of the Galaxia arc she and Hotaru are both in sixth grade (classes 1 and 3, respectively). Here's the source: http://www.chibimoon.net/mangaforms.html Neptunekh2 ( talk) 20:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Re [1]: This was done semi-automatically by AWB, as the software must have considered the article to be sufficiently wikified. As I'm checking around 500 links each evening, I don't have the time to go into the background of every page to verify each change, but put my trust in the software. This does lead to occasional mistakes, so if I do mess it up, please let me know so that I can avoid making the same mistake the following day (each link generally gets checked a few times before it's actually on the main page). Many thanks. — Tivedshambo ( t/ c) 18:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
I will accept your help. But if you want me to leave Wikipedia, I'll leave. But If I stay on wikipedia I will use Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith. Neptunekh2 ( talk) 21:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I created 2 article about a city in Sierra_leone called Ballowharf and a mountain in Peru called Pitusiray. Both articles need work on them. Neptunekh2 ( talk) 00:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
I'm posting once and 3 questions day on Blade's page. I'm not posting all over the place anymore. Thanks! Neptunekh2 ( talk) 21:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, Captain Screebo, for your recent helpful copyediting to the article, Santorum (neologism). Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt ( talk) 14:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
I noticed you have been involved in a discussion about the example of Eskimo/Inuit on Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality. I have simply removed this example from that page, and so resolved the issue. Debresser ( talk) 11:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Just to clarify Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(linking) "There are exceptions ... where the links are in a table or in a list, as each table or list should stand on its own with its own independent set of links. But, of course, within each list only the first occurence should be linked" Imgaril ( talk) 22:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Chzz ► 23:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
CaptainScreebo: Saeed while appreciating that you have a lot of enthusiasm for the subject and, quite possibly, a lot of knowledge, I would suggest that you make major edits/improvements(?) to the article in your userspace and ask someone to verify them there before sending them live. I have just spent the afternoon copyediting the small section, Physics#History, that you copyedited. I initially was going to reply to you about CAPITALS, see my edits or this article; disciplines, theories or beliefs do not take capitals unless they are at the beginning of the sentence (first word) or they contain someone's name, e.g. Newton's constant. To copyedit correctly:
Please do not make further edits to this page without discussing here or on the talk page, and I would strongly advise you to make a draft in your userspace first. Thanks. CaptainScreebo Parley! 16:43, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed: Dear Captain Screebo. Hi.
"quite possibly, a lot of knowledge"
About the useful info and advice on copy editing. I can use them.
"I have just spent the afternoon..."
"I have just spent the afternoon copyediting the small section, Physics#History, that you copyedited."
"I would suggest that you make major edits/improvements(?) to the article in your userspace and ask someone to verify them there before sending them live."
Thanks, --Saeed 20:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
CaptainScreebo:
Please do not change the article again.
Let's ask Qwyrxian what he thinks of the changes.
Even if man used astrology, mythology and religion to understand the universe initially, this is a science article and you putting mythology back in is original research and POV.
Wikipedia has rules, I study mythology, spirituality and so on and am deeply interested in Oriental philosophy, mysticism = Siva, Taoism and so forth, but Wikipedia has rules, so I cannot say "the Universe spoke to me last night so incarnate intelligence exists", this is considered original research until it is backed up by verifiable sources.
Also, a sentence like: "For example, see atomism" is not correct English and not suitable for an encyclopaedia as a proper sentence, a sentence has a subject and a verb. You are obviously not a native English speaker, and this is nothing to hold against you, but for the moment, slow down, or you will find yourself being blocked for disruption. I am willing to help but you cannot equivocally make changes like you just did, [2], unlink perfectly good wikilinks and so on. It shows that you do not (fully) understand what you are doing. CaptainScreebo Parley! 20:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed:
"Slow down"
"Let's ask Qwyrxian what he thinks of the changes."
--Saeed 20:47, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
CaptainScreebo: Saeed, it is 11 o'clock at night here, I have been editing wP on and off for about 10 hours, there is no reference about mythology, I am trying to explain to you the workings of WP and verifiability and so on. This is a science article, you need to have a book which says "man's perception of the Universe, initially influenced by mythology and religion, progressivelly discovered philosophy which led to bla bla bal", which you don't.
I'm logging off, but I am willing to help if you slow down and ask for advice/help first. I have to sleep, feed my chickens, visit my daughter tomorrow and so on. Speak to you soon. CaptainScreebo Parley! 20:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed:
"I am trying to explain to you the workings of WP and verifiability and so on. This is a science article and you putting mythology back in is original research and POV."
"I am willing to help if you slow down and ask for advice/help first"
"Speak to you soon."
Thanks, --Saeed 23:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
CaptainScreebo: Saeed, it does not say "physics evolved from x which evolved from y which evolved from z which evolved from man's attempt to understand the universe through religion and mythology" so it is synthesis, it is OR, and please stop hassling people, you will be reported and get blocked if you are not willing to listen to what people are trying to tell you. CaptainScreebo Parley! 21:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed:
"It does not say "physics evolved from x which evolved from y which evolved from z which evolved from man's attempt to understand the universe through religion and mythology" so it is synthesis" Here is more direct references with no synthesis:
Examples of references for the claim. Please read carefully.
"you will be reported and get blocked if you are not willing to listen to what people are trying to tell you."
--Saeed 23:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Qwirxian: One small note (will try to look at article later): you can't hide behind the "retired" banner to keep from following policies. I mentioned before that you (Saeed) should probably be very wary of making such drastic changes; what may well happen is that someone may just revert your whole, hard work, since its too much at once. Qwyrxian ( talk) 04:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed: Policies are ok. Slow change is ok. Being reverted is ok. being blocked is ok. and I don't edit Physics until my discussion with captainScreebo comes to a conclusion.
You (Qwyrxian) added two citation-needed tags to the article. here (above) are five references for that. We are just discussing whether they are reliable and synthesis free before adding them to the article.
Qwyrxian:Is there a reason you're refactoring the posts to use a non-standard method (putting the person's name at the beginning and not using indentation? Qwyrxian ( talk) 08:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed: No. I would use the cite book template in the article. The fields would auto arrange. -- Saeed 11:32, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes all that is true. There were numerous Godzilla projects that never were. The only one thats wrong is Godzilla vs The Devil. That was misinformation that has been spread for years from an old article in Japanese Giants. You can read about it here http://www.tohokingdom.com/articles/art_toho_busters.htm Giantdevilfish ( talk) 15:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For lifting the corner of the rug, leading to the identification of a mass of now indefblocked PR accounts and deleted promotional articles that were abusing Wikipedia's charitably donated resources. NIce work :) EyeSerene talk 16:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC) |
Your at AN/I removed a new section I added. I have therefore undone your edit; you may wish to re-add your comment. RichardOSmith ( talk) 13:41, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Why did u delete the page,it's valuable and contains reliable sources — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
DS success (
talk •
contribs)
00:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
:Um is this the same person?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Okasha
24.0.133.234 (
talk)
17:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
what the errors did u notice to fix it? u should tell me don't delete it suddenly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DS success ( talk • contribs) 01:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Antisemitic remark going unpunished regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debresser ( talk • contribs) 8:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello there! I'm not sure if you remember, but you requested an article ( Archaic Greece) to be copyedited at the Guild of Copy Editors. Sorry for the delay, but I'll be copyediting the article, so you shouldn't have to wait much longer.-- Slon02 ( talk) 18:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Captain Screebo. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Archaic Greece at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! |
I see you've also reverted Dannymex. For info, I've found he is cut'n'pasting text from other websites. Wee Curry Monster talk 12:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey look, links to Twitter accounts and YouTube and MySpace pages here, here, here, here, more, still more. The world is coming to an end!! Call the WikiCops!!! Delete! Delete! Delete! Why do you have such a hard-on for this Watts guy? What did he do to you? I revised the entry and since then the AfD consensus has been positive except for you (repeatedly) and one other member. This kid is busting his ass to get his music heard and you sit behind a computer and sanctimoniously deem him unworthy of anything but a couple of lines? Where is YOUR neutrality? Choreboy ( talk) 19:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
You have still not deleted the links to external social media sites on these entries: here, here, here, here, more, still more. Better get cracking! Why are 50 and Bieber, et al, allowed Twitter, etc. and others aren't? I can't find in the relevant links WP:RS, WP:BLP, WP:MUSICBIO, WP:GNG it says some are allowed to fudge the policies but up and coming artists aren't. Choreboy ( talk) 18:49, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
The complete deletion of my Richard Santulli edits that you made was unwarranted. The sources are reliable, it is not an orphan article and accusing me of being a PR hack is very serious accusation. If you want to contend with certain facts that is what User talk is for but you can't just go in and delete a well written and well documented Wiki entry. I can show you numerous entries that pale in comparison into the facts I put in. This article is no more self serving then Eli Wallach Monstermike99 talk 11:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
New heading or indent of previous post? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.25.107.153 ( talk) 12:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
==
. The "New section" tab automatically does that but the poster didn't use it. See more at
Help:Section.
PrimeHunter (
talk)
21:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Test after correcting level of section headings - David Biddulph ( talk) 12:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi! You corrected me here. Now the text is more encyclopedic, for sure, but it's not what actually happened. :) Please watch the music video and change it to mean that the two groups were "digitally put together" to appear performing together on stage. Also, by "following the success" I wanted to say that the Berryz' single was a success, so they released a follow-up version, so you may reword it too. And there's one more thing - it always sounds strange to me when people call Japanese idol groups "all-male" or "all-female", cause idol groups can't be gender-mixed. The closest English term for an female idol group is girl group, that's why I prefer to use it. Moscowconnection ( talk) 09:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Exok objects to the closure of the discussion about whether to split Jeremy Bamber into two articles — one about the murders and one a biography. He has requested that I make a formal proposal to split the articles on the talk page. I'm very sorry to ask this, but it would be appreciated if everyone who commented at the BLPN here could offer their opinion again at Talk:Jeremy_Bamber#Proposal_to_split_this_article_into_a_murders_article_and_a_biography. (Also, for some reason, that link isn't going directly to the subsection, so please scroll up a little to find it.) Many thanks, SlimVirgin TALK| CONTRIBS 21:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
For you're amazing job at Video game controversies, it is my honor to award you this star. Wear it with pride! Achowat ( talk) 18:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
It was a copyvio anyway eg http://www.bouygues.com/upload/pdf/discoverhistorybouygues%20group.pdf - In my experience any large unreferenced addition of text usually is.. (sadly). Mddkpp ( talk) 21:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Only applies to something deleted after discussion - AfD, MfD, RfD. Not CSD or PROD. Deleted CSD usually means it's going to be deletable, but not always. It's a common mistake, that one. If you do find one that's been XfDed, it's a good idea to list it on the tag or on the talk page - especially if it's not the same title. Peridon ( talk) 17:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Darkness Shines ( talk) 22:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello CS. I saw your edit summary here [4] and it brought a smile to my face. If you were referencing this songs When the Boat Comes In (song) alternative lyrics then you are the first person that I have come across who knows it. I learned it by watching the TV series of many moons ago. Even if you know it from somewhere else this is a fun coincidence. Cheers and happy editing to you. MarnetteD | Talk 22:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
The Three Doctors is an anniversary tradition for me. I was lucky enough to meet Pertwee and Lis Sladen at a smaller convention here in Denver in the summer of 83. I hope the upcoming weekend is full of pleasant times for you. MarnetteD | Talk 00:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Captain Screebo, I understand that you felt that my edits for the page SMS Language were too long and cluttered up the pages. I assure you that it is not my intention to vandalise the page if that is what you thought. Sorry if I messed up the page as I am quite new to editing wikipedia pages. I also completely understand if you feel that the page is already good enough as it is as sometimes, too much information can make an article less easy on the eyes. However,we would be very grateful if you will allow us to retain those edits. Sorry for making this unreasonable request, but in the meantime, we will also try our best to make our edits less confusing. If you are still feel that the edits are bad, you can revert it as you feel is appropriate. We will be very grateful if you can consider our request. Thank you very much! Also, as I said, I am new to this, may I ask if I am supposed to discuss on the talk page first before making major edits as such to ask if others think that it is fine? -- Emtan1 ( talk) 03:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello! 1615 Top 10 hits. The band does have lots and lots of "reliable third party coverage in reliable sources". Come back in a few hours. :) I didn't really want to do it, cause the article 1. is bad, 2. will never be deleted anyway. And I just recently corrected the discography links, so it's just not right what you did. :)
Moscowconnection (
talk)
18:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
I've finished adding references. (Yes, I know the writing is not good and the article doesn't have a flow, it's mostly bits and pieces taken from the news, but it's much better than before.) You should understand that j-pop and k-pop articles are mostly written either by non-English natives or by schoolchildren, so you should assume good faith. If you compare before and after, you'll see that there were only minor factual errors. All the facts in the section you marked as "unreferenced" have proven to be true. Moscowconnection ( talk) 19:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
And I undid your edits (when you just completely removed the Bibliography and Concerts sections), sorry. The info is on their website and is easily verifiable. I'm going to move these sections to the Berryz discography article, though. Cause now I think they clutter the article unnecessary. Moscowconnection ( talk) 19:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
I've moved Performances and Bibliography. Moscowconnection ( talk) 20:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
I've also put the discography links back, sorry. :) I understand that the articles about singles are mostly unreferenced, and I appreciate the fact that you didn't put them for deletion, you just deleted the links. I plan to be slowly adding sources there too. If you look at the Berryz Kobo article history, people do care about the section, so it's not like noone needs the links. Also, they facilitate navigation a lot. I'm gonna create an article for the upcoming single, so I need it to be noticed, too. :) Moscowconnection ( talk) 20:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
for the cleanup on my talk page. I'm going to go with vandalism on that one. :) Either that or the editor just felt I would enjoy some random quotes. Having no history with that editor, I'll call it vandalism. Thanks! Wikipelli Talk 09:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
You dump all over me, dig in my trash to find a template from 2010, make preposterous presumptions about WP:IDHT, claim that an encyclopædia does not require formal writing, use red herrings to show me how you reckon things oughtta be done, and to top all that – threaten to go to a noticeboard because you don't like wasting time (which is precisely what going to noticeboards is for the most part). Charming to have met you, Captain. Hearfourmewesique ( talk) 19:21, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Captain, thanks for getting involved with the Robin Ficker article. I've restored the previous, long-term consensus, specifically including the term "heckler", and updated the talk page and Trainhead's talk page . We'll see how it goes from here. -- Pemilligan ( talk) 00:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Things aren't improving. Any ideas what to do next? Seek protection from anonymous edits maybe? -- Pemilligan ( talk) 02:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. -- Pemilligan ( talk) 05:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
I'll work on this sometime.
I'd just like to say, I've disambiguated everything in the lists. You're welcome Capitan! Ncboy2010 ( talk) 15:12, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
hello sorry if its been you that ive been semi battling with on the wiki page changing "heckler". i do not agree with that word there and believe that the descriptive areas involving sports should be the only places it says heckler.
the fact is he has been punished enough by this word so much that he has not been to a game in over 14 years. so why i ask is it a accurate description of himself as he is today.
i feel it is not accurate to make something a man was labeled for 14 years ago what is focused on as the main description of him.
what do you think sir? is there a compromise we may come to on this. you are doing what you believe and i am now showing you the logic from my end, will you deny or argue please and if you can make me see more your way then vice versa i will gladly give in. if not we can continue i feel is my duty. no offense and good day to you. i hope to hear from you soon.
ty,
````mathew — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msin147 ( talk • contribs) 20:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
The Modest Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.0.179 ( talk) 20:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC) |
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Captain Screebo. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 00:13, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Congratulations, Captain Screebo, for making over 1,000 edits to articles on English Wikipedia!
Thank you for all the amazing work you've done to improve the encyclopedia, and here's to hoping there's lots more great work to come :) Maryana (WMF) ( talk) 19:43, 10 April 2012 (UTC) |
Captain Screebo, Neymar page has 'future attributes' which cannot be placed under 'outside football'. I have only tried to make the page better. User talk:Cyber17 —Preceding undated comment added 23:17, 15 April 2012 (UTC).
If the Neymar page is "well referenced", explain why cite note 60, appears as a 'Template' and does not contain any information on the matter its referencing. All of the information I've added has improved the Neymar, because if you scroll back before October 2011, you will that the page was short. Since, what ever I've added has been referenced and written well. Also, AMI, the quote under Future Attributed is neither written well or referenced, not to mention the quote of Diego Maradona does not appear on anywhere else on the net. Shouldn't Captain Screebo be reported for being negligible, repeatedly 'undoing' the correction that I have made time and time again. I may have been not neutral with my edits, but that is no reason for being called "ridiculous", I made a mistake but I will continue learning the rules of Wikipedia and will continue editing page such as Neymar. User talk:Cyber17. —Preceding undated comment added 16:49, 16 April 2012 (UTC).
Cyber you are being deliberately obtuse, as Drmies points out the source for the Chelsea offer says £20m not £18m, that's what I mean when I say that you are changing things that are well-referenced. Ridiculous refers to (as noted on the article talk page) "your peacock-termed opinion of the guys footballing skills ("who possesses blistering pace, exceptional dribbling") and ... ungrammatical changes to the text, like removing verb auxiliaries, or ... the definition of what Peixe represents". As to whatever I've added has been written well, please explain how:
I have made no objections or remarks to your additions concerning "Media" or "Sponsorship" (yet), but apparently you don't understand Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, "a widely accepted standard that all editors should normally follow" or Wikipedia:PEACOCK, that I have tried to point you too, amongst others. CaptainScreebo Parley! 14:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Yes it is. There are others--HelloAnnyong, the MacDaddy/Mommy of SPIs, recently showed me a different tool which they said was superior. Drmies ( talk) 18:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
I would suggest you to go through category:Electro-hop songs, category:Electro-hop artists, category:Electro-hop musicians and reclassify the articles properly. Staszek Lem ( talk) 00:13, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
In one section of a current AfD discussion you wrote, "You're deliberately twisting the policy to suit your own ends." When I objected, and tried to continue the discussion with you on a substantive basis, you wrote, "You must be paranoid or something" and suggested that I don't understand English. I believe administrators would see the first as a personal attack, and the second as a substantial escalation.
Do I really need to explain why? You're entitled to your opinion that my view misrepresents policy, and you're entitled to express that opinion. But to accuse another editor of deliberate misrepresentation − just a hair's breadth away from lying, after all − is completely unacceptable. It's fine to assume you're right; it's mind reading to assert that your interlocutor secretly agrees, and is deliberately making an argument he knows to be false, for self-serving motives. And I doubt you're a genuine mind reader, superpowers being so thin on the ground these days.
As to your perception that my objection was supercilious, yes, it was. That wasn't really intentional, but most people react with some form of disdain when falsely accused of deliberate misrepresentation. Nor is calling the person you're speaking with "paranoid" because he objects to being characterised as intentionally deceptive likely to win you his undying respect, either.
I'm requesting that you strike your "deliberately twisting the policy" sentence, and the entirety of the subsequent post you made at 17:21, 27 April 2012 UTC. –
OhioStandard (
talk)
05:02, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Are you sure? -- SMS Talk 09:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Ahhh for pitty SAKE Mobile Forces Source is not a user mod of mobile forces its NOT IN any way related to Mobile Forces IT WAS JUST INSPIRED BY MOBILE FORCES nothing MORE
do i haf to Leave 1000 notes on the page JuST BECAUSE SOMEBODY WONT read the "engine" part and think this cant be a user mod ITS A DIFFRENT ENGINE -_- — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Filippro (
talk •
contribs)
14:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
okey what did i do now ... yeah i got mad cuz of everyone thinking that Mobile Forces Source is eather Mobile Forces or a user mod ^^
but what did i do now ? i have copyright on MobileForcesSource.png :# and what did that u said was vandalism is i undone a edit from me that undone a edit from someone that acutally improved the language of the article -.- so what the hell did i do now. i just want to have a simple article about my game without someone constantly removing text from it and then it getting deleted automaticly 0_0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filippro ( talk • contribs) 18:07, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
i tought wikipedia was a nice place i could write articles about stuff... not get Redirrected, not get flagged for inapropriate content, not get flagged for may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline, not get for speedy deletion.... ON EVERY THEING I MAKE WHAT DO I DO WRONG !? ?! Oh ya AND CONTINUE WHAT DISRUPTIVE EDITS !? If 1 Page(my page :D) iS A HUUUGE History of disruptive content .... You have no idea whats True Griefing -_- and Also mobile forces source beta's are available BUT YOU GUYS FLAGGED THE LINKS TO MY MOBILE FORCES SORUCE SITES -_- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filippro ( talk • contribs) 18:11, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
lol its so cute i cant resist ^^
i apreciate the work your doing but i dont get what im doing wrong ...
:D (
talk)
18:17, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Since you have not responded to my previous request on this talk page that you strike offensive comments you made in a current AfD discussion, I've opened a discussion thread about the matter at Wikiquette assistance. – OhioStandard ( talk) 00:29, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Why was I accused of failing to notify JTBX when I notified him on his talk page at 10:22 28 April 2012? Did I do it incorrectly? -- Ring Cinema ( talk) 05:42, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Screebo. Looks like one of your edits on the help desk overwrote one of mine (although to be fair, I was being a bit snarky, so there's no great loss). Just thought I'd give you a heads up in case something similar crops up with someone else's edits in future. Hope you're having a good weekend, Brammers ( talk/ c) 10:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
As per your request on WP:RFC/BOARD I added an RfC to the article talk page. You may want to watch that page for additional comments from other users. Coastside ( talk) 13:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 18:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Just a helpful bit about notability for music. When songs fail to meet the notability criteria, articles are generally redirected to the album. When albums fail to meet the criteria, they are redirected to the artist. If there is no existing article for the artist, the music article is speedy deleted. Hope this helps. There's generally little reason to send music to AFD, unless the article creator is not accepting the redirect and it needs discussion and salting. Hope this helps. Cindy( talk to me) 22:33, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
I would strongly suggest that you cool your jets. Ironholds ( talk) 00:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Response to this here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Personal_group — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativetechnologist ( talk • contribs) 09:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Vice chancellor of a university is unquestionably notable by WP:PROF. I accordingly declined your speedy on Mufti Abul Qasim Nomani. Please also be aware that any claim to significance is enough to pass A7, so even if he were not actually notable by that provision, saying someone is head of any non-0trivial enterprise is a claim to importance, and could only be removed by prod or AFD. Speedy a7 is deliberately made bery weak in contrast to the requirements of WP:N. DGG ( talk ) 09:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Was Jerry Rawlings really helped by Togolese mercenaries on 28 May 1979, or is this the last filth from Mark Mysoe? DrMennoWolters ( talk) 21:54, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=
Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. (
✉→
BWilkins
←✎)
21:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Captain Screebo ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am appealing this block as I do not see where I purportedly stated that the other user was a 'fucker' or a 'fool' in permanent edit summaries on ANI. I would suggest that the admin(s) in question looked through this rather quickly and decided the complainant, who was the complainee only a few posts higher, was wronged. If you could please check the ANI post about the user and the article Gérard Depardieu you will find that the complainant has indeed crossed the very very bright revert line of 12 in the spacve of 4 hours on aforesaid article, has accused users of vandalism when they were just reinstating correct info and has persisted in battleground and badgering mentality ever since. My edit summary (in question) was to the section User:Captain Screebo: a complete fucker which implies that I am the complete fucker and is a form of irony, as I acknowledge my sins and am not repentant, nowhere do I insult that other user as a "fucker", so this is pure misrepresentation/paranoia. As to "fool" I can find no trace and my last summary to the ANI board was "try some Wikilove" (ironic or not). So, I do believe that a decision has been hastily taken with no grounds, and I have tried to cooperate with other editors at ANI and BLPN about serious policy issues regarding a BLP and now I'm getting dragged across the coals for what i percieve to be resisting ownership, POV pushing and other disagreeable behaviour. So unblock me please. CaptainScreebo Parley! 22:21, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Edit summaries such as this and this, and edits such as this, are completely unwelcome; you're lucky it's such a short time. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 22:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello Captain Screebo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Starbucks (mixtape), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not promotional. list at WP:AFD if you don't think WP:NALBUM is met. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 21:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello
I notice that you have recently edited the information for Foulksrath Castle.
I recently added and edited this information but had all the edits etc removed.
One of the reasons I changed it was inaccurate information. You have not included some of this inaccurate information in your recent changes.
For example, you mention that the Purecels were evicted by Cromwell's men to live in the barn after living in the castle for three centuries. Cromwell's campaign in Ireland was 1649-1652. This would then put the Purcells at Foulksrath around 1350. However, the De Frenes were in Foulksrath then. It was actually Fulke or his son Fulco de la Frene that gave the area it name.
Extract from Foulksrath Castle and the Families associated with it by By JOHN S. GIBB In 1295, Fulke de la Frene was seventy-third on the list of nobles summoned to a Parliament by John Wigan. He was slain by one of the Butlers of Carrick or by followers of Butler in one of the many conflicts which arose between the invaders. He left two sons, Fulco and Geoffrey, and in 1325, Fulco was one of a number who went bond for £I,000 to Bishop Ledrede for Roger, outlaw son of Alice Kyteler.
Additionally, you mention the story of Dean Swift's daughter. However, Dean Swift is not known to have had a daughter. Additionally, the Swift family did not own the castle when Dean Swift was living in Kilkenny.
your 3rd link shows two photos. The second of which claims to be the entrance to the Castle..which it is not. It is in fact the main entrance to Swifts Heath which is a large house nearby.
Thanks
Paul
(----) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul hopkins777 ( talk • contribs) 18:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
(----)
Hello. I understand that it is a collaborative effort. However, consensus does not equal accuracy. I have tried to edit this page to correct inaccuracies but have had the details changed back. As I both own and live in Foulksrath Castle I feel I should have some say as to how it is portrayed on Wikipedia and anywhere else. If people insist of correcting edits then the very least they should do is ask why it was changed in the first place and do some research into the accuracy of there proposed edits. The information regarding the Purcells having lived in a 16th century castle for three hundred years before being kicked out by Oliver Cromwell is an impossible scenario. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul hopkins777 ( talk • contribs) 01:51, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Just, wanna say sorry since you think i try to threat you. It was not my intention, i was just trying to help the user so he could get an answer from the family quickly and easily and hopefully prevent it turned into a lawsuit. Please, dont ban me forever ): 109.232.72.49 ( talk) 14:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm a believer in the Bold, Revert, Discuss system here, but I'm not interested in edit warring with you if you don't follow this system. So let's leave your bold edit as you've again reverted to it while we discuss the issue in talk. I'm interested to hear how you justify this removal. - Thibbs ( talk) 14:59, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
I saw your post at the BLP noticeboard discussion about Manny Ramirez and have replied. Thanks for your great help! -- 76.189.111.2 ( talk) 14:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Captain, have a look at the rewrite I've proposed at the article talk page, and see if it's an improvement. Thanks, 99.137.210.226 ( talk) 00:34, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
I was not calling you a jerk, I was saying don't be one. There is a difference. Even if I was wrong about the content issue, did you expect that I would like being told that my opinion does not count for much or having you order me not to undo your changes (you are not an admin, after all)? If you had remained polite, I probably would have done the same. Automatic Strikeout ( T • C) 13:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
No problems, thanks for explaining! With BLPs you have to be bold, they're such a risky area, and I pretty much take a zero-tolerance policy to unsourced material. Stub first, ask questions later ;) Giant Snowman 16:22, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
You just marked my first page (Beowulf Worldwide) for speedy deletion. I made every attempt to write the article in an encyclopedic manner by only writing about the company's background, history and industry. I left out opinions and any language that would appeared to be marketing based. Can you please give me some guidance and tell me how to fix the problem? I would greatly appreciate the effort. LADeMonico LA DeMonico ( talk) 18:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
I have assumed that you wanted User talk:Captain Screebo/BLPNotice Template deleted as well. I have to ask because user talk pages are exempt from CSD#G8. Spinning Spark 18:07, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm User:Zachtron. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. I cited "possible" vandalism as my reason for doing so, although that is yet to be determined. Please be informed that the article in question fully meets all BLP standards and proper encyclopedic guidelines for its continued inclusion in Wikipedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, please feel free to leave me a message on User_talk:Zachtron
I will be more than happy to communicate with you in a fair, honest, and productive manner. Thank you! Please note; I have now added 4 new references to the article which even further emphasizes that the article continues to meet all BLP, notability, and encyclopedic standards for its continued inclusion in Wikipedia. Zachtron ( talk) 04:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Weigh in here: [10]... Modernist ( talk) 11:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Big Thank's to you for all you're effort ! :)
Maynox (
talk)
21:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
I just wanted to reach out and say thank you for all the work you've put in to Madeon's page! I know it was a little while ago now since the last update to his Talks page but I appreciate everything you've posted over the years! -Baesuke Baesuke ( talk) 00:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
|
I have deleted this information as it was: unsolicited; in the wrong place; and falls foul of WP:BLP.
Thanks for editing the article "Hank Skinner". I had started this article several years ago and it has now grown up a lot. I live in Panama and I am also teaching English. With my students, we often publish articles, mostly in Spanish but sometimes we create some in English, and I would be glad to submit them to you for review: For instance this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peristeria_elata or this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopoldo_Fern%C3%A1ndez_%28Cuban_humorist%29 Have a nice week. We are all interested in making Wikipedia better. -- Adumoul ( talk) 12:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
When welcoming people on Wikipedia with a blank user talk page, be sure to check to see whether they are actually new or not--the easiest way is to see if their talk page has a "History" tab in the upper right corner. User:Neptunekh2, for instance, has about 8 times more edits than you do yourself; however, they have a tendency to blank their user pages after they've read messages. Just a tip for the future--thanks for your work on Wikipedia. Qwyrxian ( talk) 16:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1. I just wanted to say the this link says Eli Wallach has polish and Jewish ancestry: http://www.nndb.com/people/735/000022669/ Should that be noted in his article? Thanks! 2. Would it be ok to list Alyson_Hannigan under Category:American_people_of_Jewish_descent since it says she is Jewish on her mother's side? 3. Also is it ok to list Josh_Keaton under Category:American_people_of_Peruvian-Jewish_descent since his parents are both Peruvian and Jewish? Please give your opinions on these questions. Neptunekh2 ( talk) 12:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Captain Screebo, I just clipped some of your text from your entry on the mojo gurus as it violates quite a few guidelines. (just to name a couple). Even if the gentleman you responded to is not who he says he is, it doesn't matter. Please don't repost that. Thanks 16:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello Captain Screebo. You appear to have violated 3RR, per WP:AN3#User:Captain Screebo reported by Mtking (talk) (Result: ). If you would add a comment there and agree to take a break from the article from a period of time (e.g. one week), and from any other articles about Strauss-Kahn, an admin might close the report with no action. EdJohnston ( talk) 16:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See here. FatTrebla ( talk) 10:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
The age of Chibiusa of Sailor_Moon in the manga should be mentioned in her article. I found a source that talks about her different ages in manga: Chibiusa goes through several different designs in the manga as she grows up, but she's almost always wearing some school uniform or another. She's also unusually short for her age, a point that you notice when she hangs around with anyone from her class. When Chibiusa first shows up she's in fourth grade at Juuban Elementary. During the Death Buster's arc she's elected class president of the fifth grade, and at the beginning of the Galaxia arc she and Hotaru are both in sixth grade (classes 1 and 3, respectively). Here's the source: http://www.chibimoon.net/mangaforms.html Neptunekh2 ( talk) 20:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Re [1]: This was done semi-automatically by AWB, as the software must have considered the article to be sufficiently wikified. As I'm checking around 500 links each evening, I don't have the time to go into the background of every page to verify each change, but put my trust in the software. This does lead to occasional mistakes, so if I do mess it up, please let me know so that I can avoid making the same mistake the following day (each link generally gets checked a few times before it's actually on the main page). Many thanks. — Tivedshambo ( t/ c) 18:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
I will accept your help. But if you want me to leave Wikipedia, I'll leave. But If I stay on wikipedia I will use Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith. Neptunekh2 ( talk) 21:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I created 2 article about a city in Sierra_leone called Ballowharf and a mountain in Peru called Pitusiray. Both articles need work on them. Neptunekh2 ( talk) 00:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
I'm posting once and 3 questions day on Blade's page. I'm not posting all over the place anymore. Thanks! Neptunekh2 ( talk) 21:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, Captain Screebo, for your recent helpful copyediting to the article, Santorum (neologism). Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt ( talk) 14:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
I noticed you have been involved in a discussion about the example of Eskimo/Inuit on Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality. I have simply removed this example from that page, and so resolved the issue. Debresser ( talk) 11:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Just to clarify Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(linking) "There are exceptions ... where the links are in a table or in a list, as each table or list should stand on its own with its own independent set of links. But, of course, within each list only the first occurence should be linked" Imgaril ( talk) 22:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Chzz ► 23:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
CaptainScreebo: Saeed while appreciating that you have a lot of enthusiasm for the subject and, quite possibly, a lot of knowledge, I would suggest that you make major edits/improvements(?) to the article in your userspace and ask someone to verify them there before sending them live. I have just spent the afternoon copyediting the small section, Physics#History, that you copyedited. I initially was going to reply to you about CAPITALS, see my edits or this article; disciplines, theories or beliefs do not take capitals unless they are at the beginning of the sentence (first word) or they contain someone's name, e.g. Newton's constant. To copyedit correctly:
Please do not make further edits to this page without discussing here or on the talk page, and I would strongly advise you to make a draft in your userspace first. Thanks. CaptainScreebo Parley! 16:43, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed: Dear Captain Screebo. Hi.
"quite possibly, a lot of knowledge"
About the useful info and advice on copy editing. I can use them.
"I have just spent the afternoon..."
"I have just spent the afternoon copyediting the small section, Physics#History, that you copyedited."
"I would suggest that you make major edits/improvements(?) to the article in your userspace and ask someone to verify them there before sending them live."
Thanks, --Saeed 20:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
CaptainScreebo:
Please do not change the article again.
Let's ask Qwyrxian what he thinks of the changes.
Even if man used astrology, mythology and religion to understand the universe initially, this is a science article and you putting mythology back in is original research and POV.
Wikipedia has rules, I study mythology, spirituality and so on and am deeply interested in Oriental philosophy, mysticism = Siva, Taoism and so forth, but Wikipedia has rules, so I cannot say "the Universe spoke to me last night so incarnate intelligence exists", this is considered original research until it is backed up by verifiable sources.
Also, a sentence like: "For example, see atomism" is not correct English and not suitable for an encyclopaedia as a proper sentence, a sentence has a subject and a verb. You are obviously not a native English speaker, and this is nothing to hold against you, but for the moment, slow down, or you will find yourself being blocked for disruption. I am willing to help but you cannot equivocally make changes like you just did, [2], unlink perfectly good wikilinks and so on. It shows that you do not (fully) understand what you are doing. CaptainScreebo Parley! 20:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed:
"Slow down"
"Let's ask Qwyrxian what he thinks of the changes."
--Saeed 20:47, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
CaptainScreebo: Saeed, it is 11 o'clock at night here, I have been editing wP on and off for about 10 hours, there is no reference about mythology, I am trying to explain to you the workings of WP and verifiability and so on. This is a science article, you need to have a book which says "man's perception of the Universe, initially influenced by mythology and religion, progressivelly discovered philosophy which led to bla bla bal", which you don't.
I'm logging off, but I am willing to help if you slow down and ask for advice/help first. I have to sleep, feed my chickens, visit my daughter tomorrow and so on. Speak to you soon. CaptainScreebo Parley! 20:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed:
"I am trying to explain to you the workings of WP and verifiability and so on. This is a science article and you putting mythology back in is original research and POV."
"I am willing to help if you slow down and ask for advice/help first"
"Speak to you soon."
Thanks, --Saeed 23:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
CaptainScreebo: Saeed, it does not say "physics evolved from x which evolved from y which evolved from z which evolved from man's attempt to understand the universe through religion and mythology" so it is synthesis, it is OR, and please stop hassling people, you will be reported and get blocked if you are not willing to listen to what people are trying to tell you. CaptainScreebo Parley! 21:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed:
"It does not say "physics evolved from x which evolved from y which evolved from z which evolved from man's attempt to understand the universe through religion and mythology" so it is synthesis" Here is more direct references with no synthesis:
Examples of references for the claim. Please read carefully.
"you will be reported and get blocked if you are not willing to listen to what people are trying to tell you."
--Saeed 23:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Qwirxian: One small note (will try to look at article later): you can't hide behind the "retired" banner to keep from following policies. I mentioned before that you (Saeed) should probably be very wary of making such drastic changes; what may well happen is that someone may just revert your whole, hard work, since its too much at once. Qwyrxian ( talk) 04:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed: Policies are ok. Slow change is ok. Being reverted is ok. being blocked is ok. and I don't edit Physics until my discussion with captainScreebo comes to a conclusion.
You (Qwyrxian) added two citation-needed tags to the article. here (above) are five references for that. We are just discussing whether they are reliable and synthesis free before adding them to the article.
Qwyrxian:Is there a reason you're refactoring the posts to use a non-standard method (putting the person's name at the beginning and not using indentation? Qwyrxian ( talk) 08:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Saeed: No. I would use the cite book template in the article. The fields would auto arrange. -- Saeed 11:32, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes all that is true. There were numerous Godzilla projects that never were. The only one thats wrong is Godzilla vs The Devil. That was misinformation that has been spread for years from an old article in Japanese Giants. You can read about it here http://www.tohokingdom.com/articles/art_toho_busters.htm Giantdevilfish ( talk) 15:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For lifting the corner of the rug, leading to the identification of a mass of now indefblocked PR accounts and deleted promotional articles that were abusing Wikipedia's charitably donated resources. NIce work :) EyeSerene talk 16:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC) |
Your at AN/I removed a new section I added. I have therefore undone your edit; you may wish to re-add your comment. RichardOSmith ( talk) 13:41, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Why did u delete the page,it's valuable and contains reliable sources — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
DS success (
talk •
contribs)
00:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
:Um is this the same person?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Okasha
24.0.133.234 (
talk)
17:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
what the errors did u notice to fix it? u should tell me don't delete it suddenly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DS success ( talk • contribs) 01:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Antisemitic remark going unpunished regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debresser ( talk • contribs) 8:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello there! I'm not sure if you remember, but you requested an article ( Archaic Greece) to be copyedited at the Guild of Copy Editors. Sorry for the delay, but I'll be copyediting the article, so you shouldn't have to wait much longer.-- Slon02 ( talk) 18:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Captain Screebo. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Archaic Greece at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! |
I see you've also reverted Dannymex. For info, I've found he is cut'n'pasting text from other websites. Wee Curry Monster talk 12:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey look, links to Twitter accounts and YouTube and MySpace pages here, here, here, here, more, still more. The world is coming to an end!! Call the WikiCops!!! Delete! Delete! Delete! Why do you have such a hard-on for this Watts guy? What did he do to you? I revised the entry and since then the AfD consensus has been positive except for you (repeatedly) and one other member. This kid is busting his ass to get his music heard and you sit behind a computer and sanctimoniously deem him unworthy of anything but a couple of lines? Where is YOUR neutrality? Choreboy ( talk) 19:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
You have still not deleted the links to external social media sites on these entries: here, here, here, here, more, still more. Better get cracking! Why are 50 and Bieber, et al, allowed Twitter, etc. and others aren't? I can't find in the relevant links WP:RS, WP:BLP, WP:MUSICBIO, WP:GNG it says some are allowed to fudge the policies but up and coming artists aren't. Choreboy ( talk) 18:49, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
The complete deletion of my Richard Santulli edits that you made was unwarranted. The sources are reliable, it is not an orphan article and accusing me of being a PR hack is very serious accusation. If you want to contend with certain facts that is what User talk is for but you can't just go in and delete a well written and well documented Wiki entry. I can show you numerous entries that pale in comparison into the facts I put in. This article is no more self serving then Eli Wallach Monstermike99 talk 11:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
New heading or indent of previous post? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.25.107.153 ( talk) 12:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
==
. The "New section" tab automatically does that but the poster didn't use it. See more at
Help:Section.
PrimeHunter (
talk)
21:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Test after correcting level of section headings - David Biddulph ( talk) 12:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi! You corrected me here. Now the text is more encyclopedic, for sure, but it's not what actually happened. :) Please watch the music video and change it to mean that the two groups were "digitally put together" to appear performing together on stage. Also, by "following the success" I wanted to say that the Berryz' single was a success, so they released a follow-up version, so you may reword it too. And there's one more thing - it always sounds strange to me when people call Japanese idol groups "all-male" or "all-female", cause idol groups can't be gender-mixed. The closest English term for an female idol group is girl group, that's why I prefer to use it. Moscowconnection ( talk) 09:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Exok objects to the closure of the discussion about whether to split Jeremy Bamber into two articles — one about the murders and one a biography. He has requested that I make a formal proposal to split the articles on the talk page. I'm very sorry to ask this, but it would be appreciated if everyone who commented at the BLPN here could offer their opinion again at Talk:Jeremy_Bamber#Proposal_to_split_this_article_into_a_murders_article_and_a_biography. (Also, for some reason, that link isn't going directly to the subsection, so please scroll up a little to find it.) Many thanks, SlimVirgin TALK| CONTRIBS 21:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
For you're amazing job at Video game controversies, it is my honor to award you this star. Wear it with pride! Achowat ( talk) 18:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
It was a copyvio anyway eg http://www.bouygues.com/upload/pdf/discoverhistorybouygues%20group.pdf - In my experience any large unreferenced addition of text usually is.. (sadly). Mddkpp ( talk) 21:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Only applies to something deleted after discussion - AfD, MfD, RfD. Not CSD or PROD. Deleted CSD usually means it's going to be deletable, but not always. It's a common mistake, that one. If you do find one that's been XfDed, it's a good idea to list it on the tag or on the talk page - especially if it's not the same title. Peridon ( talk) 17:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Darkness Shines ( talk) 22:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello CS. I saw your edit summary here [4] and it brought a smile to my face. If you were referencing this songs When the Boat Comes In (song) alternative lyrics then you are the first person that I have come across who knows it. I learned it by watching the TV series of many moons ago. Even if you know it from somewhere else this is a fun coincidence. Cheers and happy editing to you. MarnetteD | Talk 22:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
The Three Doctors is an anniversary tradition for me. I was lucky enough to meet Pertwee and Lis Sladen at a smaller convention here in Denver in the summer of 83. I hope the upcoming weekend is full of pleasant times for you. MarnetteD | Talk 00:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Captain Screebo, I understand that you felt that my edits for the page SMS Language were too long and cluttered up the pages. I assure you that it is not my intention to vandalise the page if that is what you thought. Sorry if I messed up the page as I am quite new to editing wikipedia pages. I also completely understand if you feel that the page is already good enough as it is as sometimes, too much information can make an article less easy on the eyes. However,we would be very grateful if you will allow us to retain those edits. Sorry for making this unreasonable request, but in the meantime, we will also try our best to make our edits less confusing. If you are still feel that the edits are bad, you can revert it as you feel is appropriate. We will be very grateful if you can consider our request. Thank you very much! Also, as I said, I am new to this, may I ask if I am supposed to discuss on the talk page first before making major edits as such to ask if others think that it is fine? -- Emtan1 ( talk) 03:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello! 1615 Top 10 hits. The band does have lots and lots of "reliable third party coverage in reliable sources". Come back in a few hours. :) I didn't really want to do it, cause the article 1. is bad, 2. will never be deleted anyway. And I just recently corrected the discography links, so it's just not right what you did. :)
Moscowconnection (
talk)
18:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
I've finished adding references. (Yes, I know the writing is not good and the article doesn't have a flow, it's mostly bits and pieces taken from the news, but it's much better than before.) You should understand that j-pop and k-pop articles are mostly written either by non-English natives or by schoolchildren, so you should assume good faith. If you compare before and after, you'll see that there were only minor factual errors. All the facts in the section you marked as "unreferenced" have proven to be true. Moscowconnection ( talk) 19:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
And I undid your edits (when you just completely removed the Bibliography and Concerts sections), sorry. The info is on their website and is easily verifiable. I'm going to move these sections to the Berryz discography article, though. Cause now I think they clutter the article unnecessary. Moscowconnection ( talk) 19:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
I've moved Performances and Bibliography. Moscowconnection ( talk) 20:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
I've also put the discography links back, sorry. :) I understand that the articles about singles are mostly unreferenced, and I appreciate the fact that you didn't put them for deletion, you just deleted the links. I plan to be slowly adding sources there too. If you look at the Berryz Kobo article history, people do care about the section, so it's not like noone needs the links. Also, they facilitate navigation a lot. I'm gonna create an article for the upcoming single, so I need it to be noticed, too. :) Moscowconnection ( talk) 20:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
for the cleanup on my talk page. I'm going to go with vandalism on that one. :) Either that or the editor just felt I would enjoy some random quotes. Having no history with that editor, I'll call it vandalism. Thanks! Wikipelli Talk 09:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
You dump all over me, dig in my trash to find a template from 2010, make preposterous presumptions about WP:IDHT, claim that an encyclopædia does not require formal writing, use red herrings to show me how you reckon things oughtta be done, and to top all that – threaten to go to a noticeboard because you don't like wasting time (which is precisely what going to noticeboards is for the most part). Charming to have met you, Captain. Hearfourmewesique ( talk) 19:21, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Captain, thanks for getting involved with the Robin Ficker article. I've restored the previous, long-term consensus, specifically including the term "heckler", and updated the talk page and Trainhead's talk page . We'll see how it goes from here. -- Pemilligan ( talk) 00:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Things aren't improving. Any ideas what to do next? Seek protection from anonymous edits maybe? -- Pemilligan ( talk) 02:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. -- Pemilligan ( talk) 05:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
I'll work on this sometime.
I'd just like to say, I've disambiguated everything in the lists. You're welcome Capitan! Ncboy2010 ( talk) 15:12, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
hello sorry if its been you that ive been semi battling with on the wiki page changing "heckler". i do not agree with that word there and believe that the descriptive areas involving sports should be the only places it says heckler.
the fact is he has been punished enough by this word so much that he has not been to a game in over 14 years. so why i ask is it a accurate description of himself as he is today.
i feel it is not accurate to make something a man was labeled for 14 years ago what is focused on as the main description of him.
what do you think sir? is there a compromise we may come to on this. you are doing what you believe and i am now showing you the logic from my end, will you deny or argue please and if you can make me see more your way then vice versa i will gladly give in. if not we can continue i feel is my duty. no offense and good day to you. i hope to hear from you soon.
ty,
````mathew — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msin147 ( talk • contribs) 20:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
The Modest Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.0.179 ( talk) 20:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC) |
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Captain Screebo. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 00:13, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Congratulations, Captain Screebo, for making over 1,000 edits to articles on English Wikipedia!
Thank you for all the amazing work you've done to improve the encyclopedia, and here's to hoping there's lots more great work to come :) Maryana (WMF) ( talk) 19:43, 10 April 2012 (UTC) |
Captain Screebo, Neymar page has 'future attributes' which cannot be placed under 'outside football'. I have only tried to make the page better. User talk:Cyber17 —Preceding undated comment added 23:17, 15 April 2012 (UTC).
If the Neymar page is "well referenced", explain why cite note 60, appears as a 'Template' and does not contain any information on the matter its referencing. All of the information I've added has improved the Neymar, because if you scroll back before October 2011, you will that the page was short. Since, what ever I've added has been referenced and written well. Also, AMI, the quote under Future Attributed is neither written well or referenced, not to mention the quote of Diego Maradona does not appear on anywhere else on the net. Shouldn't Captain Screebo be reported for being negligible, repeatedly 'undoing' the correction that I have made time and time again. I may have been not neutral with my edits, but that is no reason for being called "ridiculous", I made a mistake but I will continue learning the rules of Wikipedia and will continue editing page such as Neymar. User talk:Cyber17. —Preceding undated comment added 16:49, 16 April 2012 (UTC).
Cyber you are being deliberately obtuse, as Drmies points out the source for the Chelsea offer says £20m not £18m, that's what I mean when I say that you are changing things that are well-referenced. Ridiculous refers to (as noted on the article talk page) "your peacock-termed opinion of the guys footballing skills ("who possesses blistering pace, exceptional dribbling") and ... ungrammatical changes to the text, like removing verb auxiliaries, or ... the definition of what Peixe represents". As to whatever I've added has been written well, please explain how:
I have made no objections or remarks to your additions concerning "Media" or "Sponsorship" (yet), but apparently you don't understand Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, "a widely accepted standard that all editors should normally follow" or Wikipedia:PEACOCK, that I have tried to point you too, amongst others. CaptainScreebo Parley! 14:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Yes it is. There are others--HelloAnnyong, the MacDaddy/Mommy of SPIs, recently showed me a different tool which they said was superior. Drmies ( talk) 18:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
I would suggest you to go through category:Electro-hop songs, category:Electro-hop artists, category:Electro-hop musicians and reclassify the articles properly. Staszek Lem ( talk) 00:13, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
In one section of a current AfD discussion you wrote, "You're deliberately twisting the policy to suit your own ends." When I objected, and tried to continue the discussion with you on a substantive basis, you wrote, "You must be paranoid or something" and suggested that I don't understand English. I believe administrators would see the first as a personal attack, and the second as a substantial escalation.
Do I really need to explain why? You're entitled to your opinion that my view misrepresents policy, and you're entitled to express that opinion. But to accuse another editor of deliberate misrepresentation − just a hair's breadth away from lying, after all − is completely unacceptable. It's fine to assume you're right; it's mind reading to assert that your interlocutor secretly agrees, and is deliberately making an argument he knows to be false, for self-serving motives. And I doubt you're a genuine mind reader, superpowers being so thin on the ground these days.
As to your perception that my objection was supercilious, yes, it was. That wasn't really intentional, but most people react with some form of disdain when falsely accused of deliberate misrepresentation. Nor is calling the person you're speaking with "paranoid" because he objects to being characterised as intentionally deceptive likely to win you his undying respect, either.
I'm requesting that you strike your "deliberately twisting the policy" sentence, and the entirety of the subsequent post you made at 17:21, 27 April 2012 UTC. –
OhioStandard (
talk)
05:02, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Are you sure? -- SMS Talk 09:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Ahhh for pitty SAKE Mobile Forces Source is not a user mod of mobile forces its NOT IN any way related to Mobile Forces IT WAS JUST INSPIRED BY MOBILE FORCES nothing MORE
do i haf to Leave 1000 notes on the page JuST BECAUSE SOMEBODY WONT read the "engine" part and think this cant be a user mod ITS A DIFFRENT ENGINE -_- — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Filippro (
talk •
contribs)
14:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
okey what did i do now ... yeah i got mad cuz of everyone thinking that Mobile Forces Source is eather Mobile Forces or a user mod ^^
but what did i do now ? i have copyright on MobileForcesSource.png :# and what did that u said was vandalism is i undone a edit from me that undone a edit from someone that acutally improved the language of the article -.- so what the hell did i do now. i just want to have a simple article about my game without someone constantly removing text from it and then it getting deleted automaticly 0_0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filippro ( talk • contribs) 18:07, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
i tought wikipedia was a nice place i could write articles about stuff... not get Redirrected, not get flagged for inapropriate content, not get flagged for may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline, not get for speedy deletion.... ON EVERY THEING I MAKE WHAT DO I DO WRONG !? ?! Oh ya AND CONTINUE WHAT DISRUPTIVE EDITS !? If 1 Page(my page :D) iS A HUUUGE History of disruptive content .... You have no idea whats True Griefing -_- and Also mobile forces source beta's are available BUT YOU GUYS FLAGGED THE LINKS TO MY MOBILE FORCES SORUCE SITES -_- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filippro ( talk • contribs) 18:11, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
lol its so cute i cant resist ^^
i apreciate the work your doing but i dont get what im doing wrong ...
:D (
talk)
18:17, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Since you have not responded to my previous request on this talk page that you strike offensive comments you made in a current AfD discussion, I've opened a discussion thread about the matter at Wikiquette assistance. – OhioStandard ( talk) 00:29, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Why was I accused of failing to notify JTBX when I notified him on his talk page at 10:22 28 April 2012? Did I do it incorrectly? -- Ring Cinema ( talk) 05:42, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Screebo. Looks like one of your edits on the help desk overwrote one of mine (although to be fair, I was being a bit snarky, so there's no great loss). Just thought I'd give you a heads up in case something similar crops up with someone else's edits in future. Hope you're having a good weekend, Brammers ( talk/ c) 10:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
As per your request on WP:RFC/BOARD I added an RfC to the article talk page. You may want to watch that page for additional comments from other users. Coastside ( talk) 13:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 18:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Just a helpful bit about notability for music. When songs fail to meet the notability criteria, articles are generally redirected to the album. When albums fail to meet the criteria, they are redirected to the artist. If there is no existing article for the artist, the music article is speedy deleted. Hope this helps. There's generally little reason to send music to AFD, unless the article creator is not accepting the redirect and it needs discussion and salting. Hope this helps. Cindy( talk to me) 22:33, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
I would strongly suggest that you cool your jets. Ironholds ( talk) 00:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Response to this here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Personal_group — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativetechnologist ( talk • contribs) 09:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Vice chancellor of a university is unquestionably notable by WP:PROF. I accordingly declined your speedy on Mufti Abul Qasim Nomani. Please also be aware that any claim to significance is enough to pass A7, so even if he were not actually notable by that provision, saying someone is head of any non-0trivial enterprise is a claim to importance, and could only be removed by prod or AFD. Speedy a7 is deliberately made bery weak in contrast to the requirements of WP:N. DGG ( talk ) 09:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Was Jerry Rawlings really helped by Togolese mercenaries on 28 May 1979, or is this the last filth from Mark Mysoe? DrMennoWolters ( talk) 21:54, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=
Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. (
✉→
BWilkins
←✎)
21:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Captain Screebo ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am appealing this block as I do not see where I purportedly stated that the other user was a 'fucker' or a 'fool' in permanent edit summaries on ANI. I would suggest that the admin(s) in question looked through this rather quickly and decided the complainant, who was the complainee only a few posts higher, was wronged. If you could please check the ANI post about the user and the article Gérard Depardieu you will find that the complainant has indeed crossed the very very bright revert line of 12 in the spacve of 4 hours on aforesaid article, has accused users of vandalism when they were just reinstating correct info and has persisted in battleground and badgering mentality ever since. My edit summary (in question) was to the section User:Captain Screebo: a complete fucker which implies that I am the complete fucker and is a form of irony, as I acknowledge my sins and am not repentant, nowhere do I insult that other user as a "fucker", so this is pure misrepresentation/paranoia. As to "fool" I can find no trace and my last summary to the ANI board was "try some Wikilove" (ironic or not). So, I do believe that a decision has been hastily taken with no grounds, and I have tried to cooperate with other editors at ANI and BLPN about serious policy issues regarding a BLP and now I'm getting dragged across the coals for what i percieve to be resisting ownership, POV pushing and other disagreeable behaviour. So unblock me please. CaptainScreebo Parley! 22:21, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Edit summaries such as this and this, and edits such as this, are completely unwelcome; you're lucky it's such a short time. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 22:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello Captain Screebo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Starbucks (mixtape), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not promotional. list at WP:AFD if you don't think WP:NALBUM is met. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 21:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello
I notice that you have recently edited the information for Foulksrath Castle.
I recently added and edited this information but had all the edits etc removed.
One of the reasons I changed it was inaccurate information. You have not included some of this inaccurate information in your recent changes.
For example, you mention that the Purecels were evicted by Cromwell's men to live in the barn after living in the castle for three centuries. Cromwell's campaign in Ireland was 1649-1652. This would then put the Purcells at Foulksrath around 1350. However, the De Frenes were in Foulksrath then. It was actually Fulke or his son Fulco de la Frene that gave the area it name.
Extract from Foulksrath Castle and the Families associated with it by By JOHN S. GIBB In 1295, Fulke de la Frene was seventy-third on the list of nobles summoned to a Parliament by John Wigan. He was slain by one of the Butlers of Carrick or by followers of Butler in one of the many conflicts which arose between the invaders. He left two sons, Fulco and Geoffrey, and in 1325, Fulco was one of a number who went bond for £I,000 to Bishop Ledrede for Roger, outlaw son of Alice Kyteler.
Additionally, you mention the story of Dean Swift's daughter. However, Dean Swift is not known to have had a daughter. Additionally, the Swift family did not own the castle when Dean Swift was living in Kilkenny.
your 3rd link shows two photos. The second of which claims to be the entrance to the Castle..which it is not. It is in fact the main entrance to Swifts Heath which is a large house nearby.
Thanks
Paul
(----) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul hopkins777 ( talk • contribs) 18:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
(----)
Hello. I understand that it is a collaborative effort. However, consensus does not equal accuracy. I have tried to edit this page to correct inaccuracies but have had the details changed back. As I both own and live in Foulksrath Castle I feel I should have some say as to how it is portrayed on Wikipedia and anywhere else. If people insist of correcting edits then the very least they should do is ask why it was changed in the first place and do some research into the accuracy of there proposed edits. The information regarding the Purcells having lived in a 16th century castle for three hundred years before being kicked out by Oliver Cromwell is an impossible scenario. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul hopkins777 ( talk • contribs) 01:51, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Just, wanna say sorry since you think i try to threat you. It was not my intention, i was just trying to help the user so he could get an answer from the family quickly and easily and hopefully prevent it turned into a lawsuit. Please, dont ban me forever ): 109.232.72.49 ( talk) 14:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm a believer in the Bold, Revert, Discuss system here, but I'm not interested in edit warring with you if you don't follow this system. So let's leave your bold edit as you've again reverted to it while we discuss the issue in talk. I'm interested to hear how you justify this removal. - Thibbs ( talk) 14:59, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
I saw your post at the BLP noticeboard discussion about Manny Ramirez and have replied. Thanks for your great help! -- 76.189.111.2 ( talk) 14:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Captain, have a look at the rewrite I've proposed at the article talk page, and see if it's an improvement. Thanks, 99.137.210.226 ( talk) 00:34, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
I was not calling you a jerk, I was saying don't be one. There is a difference. Even if I was wrong about the content issue, did you expect that I would like being told that my opinion does not count for much or having you order me not to undo your changes (you are not an admin, after all)? If you had remained polite, I probably would have done the same. Automatic Strikeout ( T • C) 13:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
No problems, thanks for explaining! With BLPs you have to be bold, they're such a risky area, and I pretty much take a zero-tolerance policy to unsourced material. Stub first, ask questions later ;) Giant Snowman 16:22, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
You just marked my first page (Beowulf Worldwide) for speedy deletion. I made every attempt to write the article in an encyclopedic manner by only writing about the company's background, history and industry. I left out opinions and any language that would appeared to be marketing based. Can you please give me some guidance and tell me how to fix the problem? I would greatly appreciate the effort. LADeMonico LA DeMonico ( talk) 18:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
I have assumed that you wanted User talk:Captain Screebo/BLPNotice Template deleted as well. I have to ask because user talk pages are exempt from CSD#G8. Spinning Spark 18:07, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm User:Zachtron. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. I cited "possible" vandalism as my reason for doing so, although that is yet to be determined. Please be informed that the article in question fully meets all BLP standards and proper encyclopedic guidelines for its continued inclusion in Wikipedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, please feel free to leave me a message on User_talk:Zachtron
I will be more than happy to communicate with you in a fair, honest, and productive manner. Thank you! Please note; I have now added 4 new references to the article which even further emphasizes that the article continues to meet all BLP, notability, and encyclopedic standards for its continued inclusion in Wikipedia. Zachtron ( talk) 04:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Weigh in here: [10]... Modernist ( talk) 11:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Big Thank's to you for all you're effort ! :)
Maynox (
talk)
21:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
I just wanted to reach out and say thank you for all the work you've put in to Madeon's page! I know it was a little while ago now since the last update to his Talks page but I appreciate everything you've posted over the years! -Baesuke Baesuke ( talk) 00:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)