Hello, I'm
Mako001. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Telegony—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Mako001
(C)
(T) 🇺🇦
02:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
DatGuy
Talk
Contribs
18:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Call-me-Ishmae1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello Admin, I'm sorry to hear that Wikipedia classified my account as multi-account. First of all, I am not the same person as Trusci. I'd like to request a deeper multi-account inspection of Trusci and myself in this regard. I don't know who Trusci is. However, it cannot be denied that Trusci and I are related in some way. Because I emailed Trusci using a different account [1] on the Korean Wikipedia. [2] -- To let they know of theirs mistakes that I have identified. It's because the act of pointing out mistakes in public is hard to tolerate in Korean culture. Plus, I didn't want to reveal my primary email. As you can tell if you can see my email, my primary email is connected with my own domain. If someone can get my email, they can easily figure out my personal information. But that's all. Trusci didn't answer emails. and The topic I contributed to recently became an issue on the Korean web for a while(Telegony( Korean: 감응유전 [3]), Please refer to the search trend of Naver, the search engine mainly used in Korea. [4]), and I think that's why Trusci and I have a common interest. Here's my contribution to the Korean Wikipedia. [5] I am a migrant to Wikipedia from another Korean wiki, and this account was never created for a single purpose. PS: I'm not fluent in English. I would like to apologize in advance for this. Please understand this.
Decline reason:
I find your explanations regarding the sockpuppetry plausible, but am concerned by your engagement around Telegony (inheritance). Given that the sockpuppetry concern is that this account coordinated with Trusci to edit this topic, I think the best solution would be to offer you a conditional unblock, where you would be unblocked, but topic-banned from making edits to content or discussions related to telegony, with the t-ban appealable following evidence of constructive editing in other areas. If you agree to these conditions, please post a new unblock request saying so and ping me. Otherwise, you are free to make a new unblock request at your discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 00:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Call-me-Ishmae1 ( talk) 19:06, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Call-me-Ishmae1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
@ Rosguill: Procedural unblock request according to Admin review [21]. I have confirmed the conditions offered by Admin, and I accept their offered "t-ban appealable for topic telegony". Here again, I promise to continue constructive editing of Wikipedia.
Accept reason:
Accepting and imposing an indefinite t-ban on Telegony per the rationale I laid out in the prior unblock request. signed, Rosguill talk 01:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Call-me-Ishmae1 ( talk) 01:30, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
It's been over a week since I was blocked for sockpuppetry. My block appeal has not yet been reviewed. But thankfully, in the meantime, several experienced editors and admins have taken an interest in my block and left comments.
I clearly understand that Wikipedia administrators are volunteers. And I understand clearly that they will handle this request when the time is right, and I have decided to be patient. But my block was triggered by fairly fragmented information. My SPI case was concluded in just over an hour, and I only found out about this when I got a block notification email. Since then, I have been waiting for a week without a promise. Please consider this together. Thank you. -- Call-me-Ishmae1 ( talk) 22:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
The following is a standard notice of discretionary sanctions measures regarding editing contentious topics. It is typically given to editors who have expressed interest in a given topic affected by these measures. Telegony, as a fringe science topic, falls under these measures. While the above topic-ban was imposed as an unblock condition and thus is not subject to discretionary sanctions procedure, you should nevertheless be aware of sanctions related to the topic at-large. While you are only topic-banned from telegony, and not fringe science generally, you are advised that edits to other fringe science topics will be subject to significant scrutiny and, if subpar, may be taken as evidence that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
signed, Rosguill talk 01:51, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mako001. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Telegony—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Mako001
(C)
(T) 🇺🇦
02:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
DatGuy
Talk
Contribs
18:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Call-me-Ishmae1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello Admin, I'm sorry to hear that Wikipedia classified my account as multi-account. First of all, I am not the same person as Trusci. I'd like to request a deeper multi-account inspection of Trusci and myself in this regard. I don't know who Trusci is. However, it cannot be denied that Trusci and I are related in some way. Because I emailed Trusci using a different account [1] on the Korean Wikipedia. [2] -- To let they know of theirs mistakes that I have identified. It's because the act of pointing out mistakes in public is hard to tolerate in Korean culture. Plus, I didn't want to reveal my primary email. As you can tell if you can see my email, my primary email is connected with my own domain. If someone can get my email, they can easily figure out my personal information. But that's all. Trusci didn't answer emails. and The topic I contributed to recently became an issue on the Korean web for a while(Telegony( Korean: 감응유전 [3]), Please refer to the search trend of Naver, the search engine mainly used in Korea. [4]), and I think that's why Trusci and I have a common interest. Here's my contribution to the Korean Wikipedia. [5] I am a migrant to Wikipedia from another Korean wiki, and this account was never created for a single purpose. PS: I'm not fluent in English. I would like to apologize in advance for this. Please understand this.
Decline reason:
I find your explanations regarding the sockpuppetry plausible, but am concerned by your engagement around Telegony (inheritance). Given that the sockpuppetry concern is that this account coordinated with Trusci to edit this topic, I think the best solution would be to offer you a conditional unblock, where you would be unblocked, but topic-banned from making edits to content or discussions related to telegony, with the t-ban appealable following evidence of constructive editing in other areas. If you agree to these conditions, please post a new unblock request saying so and ping me. Otherwise, you are free to make a new unblock request at your discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 00:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Call-me-Ishmae1 ( talk) 19:06, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Call-me-Ishmae1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
@ Rosguill: Procedural unblock request according to Admin review [21]. I have confirmed the conditions offered by Admin, and I accept their offered "t-ban appealable for topic telegony". Here again, I promise to continue constructive editing of Wikipedia.
Accept reason:
Accepting and imposing an indefinite t-ban on Telegony per the rationale I laid out in the prior unblock request. signed, Rosguill talk 01:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Call-me-Ishmae1 ( talk) 01:30, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
It's been over a week since I was blocked for sockpuppetry. My block appeal has not yet been reviewed. But thankfully, in the meantime, several experienced editors and admins have taken an interest in my block and left comments.
I clearly understand that Wikipedia administrators are volunteers. And I understand clearly that they will handle this request when the time is right, and I have decided to be patient. But my block was triggered by fairly fragmented information. My SPI case was concluded in just over an hour, and I only found out about this when I got a block notification email. Since then, I have been waiting for a week without a promise. Please consider this together. Thank you. -- Call-me-Ishmae1 ( talk) 22:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
The following is a standard notice of discretionary sanctions measures regarding editing contentious topics. It is typically given to editors who have expressed interest in a given topic affected by these measures. Telegony, as a fringe science topic, falls under these measures. While the above topic-ban was imposed as an unblock condition and thus is not subject to discretionary sanctions procedure, you should nevertheless be aware of sanctions related to the topic at-large. While you are only topic-banned from telegony, and not fringe science generally, you are advised that edits to other fringe science topics will be subject to significant scrutiny and, if subpar, may be taken as evidence that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
signed, Rosguill talk 01:51, 30 December 2022 (UTC)