![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, CaliforniaAliBaba. I've noticed that you've got many DYK titles, and I want to nominate kimchi bokkeumbap to the page for the first time. The article lacks inline citation, but putting aside the matter, do you think the article at the status is qualified for the nomination? You know the procedure well, so I need your help. Thanks.-- Appletrees ( talk) 17:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
One more question, I also notice that you use a kind of "secure" tool when you insert a link on talk pages. How do you use? I'm just curious..-- Appletrees ( talk) 17:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi CAB!
I don't know how to report a user violated WP:SOCK. Please help me, Thanks!
Thank you! Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 03:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry. I reverted my edit. See my discussion at that talk page. -- Neo-Jay ( talk) 10:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I didn't write the Nick Savoy page but I worked on it extensively. I noticed that you voted to delete. I'm not sure if this sways your decision (which was made based on 'notability' but he is on the Dr Phil show tomorrow, April 11. I just saw him on TV as the Dr Phil show is promoting him extensively (www.drphil.com/shows). So now I have found:
Does the Dr Phil showchange your opinion? If not, what would? I would like to get the page back up; I worked really hard on it. Thanks so much for your time! Camera123456 ( talk) 23:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, see this. The article is poorly written; I guess that could be rectified. The problem is that this term is virtually unknown outside South-Asian American circles. I guess my reaction was more knee-jerk, since I did a merge discussion (as you can see in the link) and every now-and-then, someone comes along and reverts the article to the state before the merge. You've provided a bunch of useful references and what I'll do is rewrite the article, incorporating them. -- vi5in [talk] 15:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
For example, the word 'salty' 鹹 is pronounced [ham21] in Cantonese and [kiem55] in Teochew. Shingrila ( talk) 07:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I responded on my talk page. -- Boracay Bill ( talk) 22:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, this is just a courtesy notice regarding the article. Since you either edited the article, or participated in talk page of the article, I thought you might be interested. -- vi5in [talk] 16:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome and tip, friend! Elbonia ( talk) 07:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you add
defamatory content once again, as you did to
Han Chinese, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
87.14.53.149 (
talk •
contribs) 10:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
You may be interested in this proposal to revise the text for articles using non-English sources. -- ROGER DAVIES talk 04:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Here (and also, if possible, here?) Justmeherenow ( ) 05:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
It looks like Korea4one ( talk · contribs) is back with more socks:
So far, no POV-pushing, though, just changing sourced info to unsourced at Korean language and associated screaming at Talk:Korean language. — An gr 18:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I've started a report at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Korea4one (3rd). — An gr 18:40, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I am not trying to be rude in any way, but you have no right to talk with me that way! You can continue to treat me like a servant, but then I will be fed up. As I repeat, I am not trying to be rude, but I have no choice! Forgive me Russian Luxembourger ( talk) 05:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Stop your haunting comments on my pages. I can see that you want me banned! Well you know what! I am reporting you. That is final! Russian Luxembourger ( talk) 19:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
I would like to nominate the following fact from the article Vietnamese people in Germany that you recently created, what do you think?
... Vietnamese people are the largest group of resident foreigners from Asia in Germany, totalling 83,526 people as of 2004?
DHN ( talk) 05:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
I reported you due to your horrible commentsm, and your act. I am reporting you, I've had it! Russian Luxembourger ( talk) 15:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
If you ever decide to write this article, these studies by the same author are valuable resources. DHN ( talk) 00:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 09:34, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the DYK nomination --- I modified the hook a bit and rewrote the paragraph in question because after I reread the source, I think it meant the present day and not 1896 --- that also agrees with the numbers I got from other sources. See Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on October 27. Cheers, cab ( talk) 13:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I am reporting you once again. You are a ridiculous person, all you want to do is ban me. I am reporting you. Russian Luxembourger ( talk) 21:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Gatoclass ( talk) 15:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Cirt ( talk) 20:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
A good resource I found that might be helpful for your article creation is the Encyclopedia of Diasporas. It contains detailed articles on the Hakka, Hmong, Hui, Jewish in China, Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, Filipinos, etc, and has specific articles on each of these diaspora groups in specific countries such as Hungary, Japan, Canada, the US, Denmark, Russia, Australia, etc. Cheers. DHN ( talk) 18:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Australian Barnstar of National Merit | |
For your excellent work on expanding the Ethiopian Australian article! Matilda talk 22:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
this WikiAward was given to CaliforniaAliBaba by Matilda talk on 22:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) |
Hi, I am really impressed and thankful for you contributions to the article Bolivians in the United Kingdom, I am looking to improve other articles in this way, have you got any particulat websites or sources that would help me to be able to exapnd the UK ethnic group articles. Thanks. Stevvvv4444 talk on 20:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
我是台灣人,不明白英語和越南語,希望你可以創建「 Vietnamese Migrant Workers and Brides Office」(越南外勞配偶辦公室)的條目,感恩!
-- 越南萬歲! ( talk) 20:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
-- 力道山 ( talk) 12:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
You're right. Thanks for the correction. I was too quick. Victuallers ( talk) 11:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
I did what you ask, and in my opinion, I think Skanter is not a sockpuppet of Troy86.
My reasons: If you see the contributions of Skanter [5] or any of Skanter suspected sockpuppets [6], his edits only deal with Brazilian articles and he creates useless articles of Brazilian ethnic groups. When I saw Troy86's contibutions [7] or any of his sockpuppets that you presented, his edits dealt with African/Black articles and creates useless articles about African/Black groups in any country. The pages they edit together are the ones that deal with both Africans and Brazilians, and in my opinion, it just a coincidence. Skanter has also created many pages of small European, White, or Asian ethnic groups that have been deleted Belarussian Brazilian, Canadian Brazilian, and Filipino Brazilians (note: these are the AfD pages). The other incidents that you showed me that involved CARLMART, I think the same can be applied, that it is just a coincidence. CARLMART was making articles in random, and he didn't stay in a specific topic like Skanter (Brazilians) and Troy86 (Africans).
Another reason is the IP addresses. In the suspected sockpuppets of Troy86, he has only one IP address which is 70.156.138.197. If you look at all the IP address that are suspected to be Skanter's, the numbers begin with 189 while Troy86 only IP address begins with 70. I know that some of Skanter's IPs trace to a Brazilian website, but I don't know about Troy86's IP.
This is why my conclusion is Skanter is not Troy 86. I hope my information is helpful. If you need a second opinion, you should ask Opinoso, he has dealt more with Skanter than me. Anyways, Thank you for asking my help.
Thank you for reading. Lehoiberri ( talk) 19:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
What I say is at least questionable, from a source you speak "reliable", we all know that not even the same sources are 100% safe gubernametales on the other Russians in Chile 250 citations is that? you think that source reliable? And if these are the descendants recidentes but arrived more than a century ago as it added 70,000 source said that it is also very reliable so we let the two references. Saludos-- Kusamanic ( talk) 11:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)-- Kusamanic ( talk) 11:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Upravo sam moj prvi korak u wikiju na hrvatskom jeziku, I'm learning za izmjenu cijene puno žao. pozdravi.
I just my first step in the wiki in English, I'm learning to edit cost much sorry. greetings-- Kusamanic ( talk) 10:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)-- Kusamanic ( talk) 10:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
perhaps then ethnic chinese's inherent "disambig-ness" could be rethought. apparently this term "overseas chinese" is pretty established and accepted tho it does smack of something a government somewhere came up with. come to think of it, it has a distinct POV flavor of "I'm inside china, I am what is called chinese, everyone else is someone who left or descended from someone who left." vibe, no? I didn't create the term. hey, it seems accepted and established. and I understand that the PRC has a complex relationship with ethnic chinese in other countries, as reflected in the overseas Chinese article.
Might sound weird-- and I guess this is in the article itself but-- some "ethnic" chinese persons in other counries are not in any reasonable sense "over seas". they are in various asian countries. why does this umbrella term seem to be the only one to refer to all the persons that make up these various unique populations. if you could direct me to anywhere I could learn more about this (that is, how these peoples are referred to) on or off 'pedia, that'd be awesome. thanks.
lastly for what it's worth, spoken language matters. the term "ethnic chinese" is a term that people use. (I'm not too good with the citation thing. I try to get someone in on my cause who's got those skills to find a cite.) I think it's usu in a geopolitics context. it would be silly, unclear or forcedly polite, in some conversations, especially if none of said persons are in the room to refer to them as "overseas". holler. Cogido 'll aka Huh? 18:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, could you come to the Sinitic languages article talk page and discuss, as the article's merge is gone and an article has been written. User:Kwamikagami, who wrote the article, has been re-classifying Chinese language in pretty much all articles about Chinese (i.e. Mandarin Chinese, Cantonese, Min-Nan, Old Chinese...) as well as Sino-Tibetan language-related articles. The thing I found problematic is that Kwamikagami has been classifying Sino-Tibetan languages (Chinese and Tibeto-Burman) in a way that is contrary to mainstream encyclopedia sources, like Encyclopedia Britannica [10] and Ethnologue's [11] classifications (the user also classified Bai language under his/her newly created "Sinitic" language family instead of Tibeto-Burman language family), that is why I hope you can come and discuss with us.-- TheLeopard ( talk) 21:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello! I am working on an objective alternate to notability in my userspace. Please read User:A Nobody/Inclusion guidelines and offer any suggestions on its talk page, which I will consider for revision purposes. If you do not do so, no worries, but if you wish to help, it is appreciated. Best, -- A Nobody My talk 01:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
-- 林元曌 ( talk) 20:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
-- 林元曌 ( talk) 07:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
-- 林元曌 ( talk) 07:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
hey, just to let you know i spent alot of time and effort on this article and used all my information from an issue of the economist magazine i had. id apreciate it if yu could revert the edits again. thankyou user:megastrike14 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.136.37 ( talk • contribs) 00:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC
Hello
I got the information from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of the Republic of Korea. Funnily, it was stated in the following paragraph where the information came from, but yet you stated that I did not cite a reference?
Anyhow, I've added reference numbers including a good hyperlink. See if that's fine with you? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhoos ( talk • contribs) 21:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
用戶 User:阮明珠是在維護和修正 Peter Nguyen和 Vietnamese people in Taiwan的條目,可是你卻惡意回退 User:阮明珠的貢獻,我看你才是破壞者!-- 阮明惠 ( talk) 14:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm curious why I always see you making the text of {{
cent}} more compact, and sometimes a bit confusing for me. Can't users just set a width=
or similar, that way those who want a narrow banner can have one, but those with larger resolutions can have it set to regular. Which is still pretty narrow to begin with. Thanks for your time,
§hep
Talk 00:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Further down, it states:
As of 2006, the Hoa became the largest ethnic minority in Vietnam, with figures of 2.3 million.[3]
I think this article contradicts itself. I noticed that, but added just in case. Umm, yeah, I do NOT know. My ba is an Hoa but left the country way back in 1977 for bustling Los Angeles. ★ Dasani★ 02:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Given the probable sockpuppetry from the users who have vandalized your user page, I'd recommend you to file a report at WP:SSP (and especially while they're still on their blocks!). Cheers, — sephiroth bcr ( converse) 08:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
I've been bold :) -- lucasbfr talk 12:56, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution to the April Fool's Day fun! Royal broil 00:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for this article! I've nominated it for DYK. Vmenkov ( talk) 06:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Great work on this article! An old advisor of mine, Loretta Kim (currently at SUNY Albany) is active in Xibe language revitalization projects and has told me about this newspaper before; great to see it on WP. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 15:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
[12] I agree your edit. I 100% support your edit. thanks. Cherry Blossom OK ( talk) 11:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you add
defamatory content once again, as you did to
Chinese people, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Meitoufu (
talk) 11:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC) —
Meitoufu (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, CaliforniaAliBaba. I've noticed that you've got many DYK titles, and I want to nominate kimchi bokkeumbap to the page for the first time. The article lacks inline citation, but putting aside the matter, do you think the article at the status is qualified for the nomination? You know the procedure well, so I need your help. Thanks.-- Appletrees ( talk) 17:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
One more question, I also notice that you use a kind of "secure" tool when you insert a link on talk pages. How do you use? I'm just curious..-- Appletrees ( talk) 17:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi CAB!
I don't know how to report a user violated WP:SOCK. Please help me, Thanks!
Thank you! Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 03:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry. I reverted my edit. See my discussion at that talk page. -- Neo-Jay ( talk) 10:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I didn't write the Nick Savoy page but I worked on it extensively. I noticed that you voted to delete. I'm not sure if this sways your decision (which was made based on 'notability' but he is on the Dr Phil show tomorrow, April 11. I just saw him on TV as the Dr Phil show is promoting him extensively (www.drphil.com/shows). So now I have found:
Does the Dr Phil showchange your opinion? If not, what would? I would like to get the page back up; I worked really hard on it. Thanks so much for your time! Camera123456 ( talk) 23:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, see this. The article is poorly written; I guess that could be rectified. The problem is that this term is virtually unknown outside South-Asian American circles. I guess my reaction was more knee-jerk, since I did a merge discussion (as you can see in the link) and every now-and-then, someone comes along and reverts the article to the state before the merge. You've provided a bunch of useful references and what I'll do is rewrite the article, incorporating them. -- vi5in [talk] 15:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
For example, the word 'salty' 鹹 is pronounced [ham21] in Cantonese and [kiem55] in Teochew. Shingrila ( talk) 07:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I responded on my talk page. -- Boracay Bill ( talk) 22:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, this is just a courtesy notice regarding the article. Since you either edited the article, or participated in talk page of the article, I thought you might be interested. -- vi5in [talk] 16:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome and tip, friend! Elbonia ( talk) 07:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you add
defamatory content once again, as you did to
Han Chinese, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
87.14.53.149 (
talk •
contribs) 10:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
You may be interested in this proposal to revise the text for articles using non-English sources. -- ROGER DAVIES talk 04:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Here (and also, if possible, here?) Justmeherenow ( ) 05:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
It looks like Korea4one ( talk · contribs) is back with more socks:
So far, no POV-pushing, though, just changing sourced info to unsourced at Korean language and associated screaming at Talk:Korean language. — An gr 18:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I've started a report at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Korea4one (3rd). — An gr 18:40, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I am not trying to be rude in any way, but you have no right to talk with me that way! You can continue to treat me like a servant, but then I will be fed up. As I repeat, I am not trying to be rude, but I have no choice! Forgive me Russian Luxembourger ( talk) 05:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Stop your haunting comments on my pages. I can see that you want me banned! Well you know what! I am reporting you. That is final! Russian Luxembourger ( talk) 19:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
I would like to nominate the following fact from the article Vietnamese people in Germany that you recently created, what do you think?
... Vietnamese people are the largest group of resident foreigners from Asia in Germany, totalling 83,526 people as of 2004?
DHN ( talk) 05:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
I reported you due to your horrible commentsm, and your act. I am reporting you, I've had it! Russian Luxembourger ( talk) 15:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
If you ever decide to write this article, these studies by the same author are valuable resources. DHN ( talk) 00:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 09:34, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the DYK nomination --- I modified the hook a bit and rewrote the paragraph in question because after I reread the source, I think it meant the present day and not 1896 --- that also agrees with the numbers I got from other sources. See Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on October 27. Cheers, cab ( talk) 13:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I am reporting you once again. You are a ridiculous person, all you want to do is ban me. I am reporting you. Russian Luxembourger ( talk) 21:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Gatoclass ( talk) 15:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Cirt ( talk) 20:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
A good resource I found that might be helpful for your article creation is the Encyclopedia of Diasporas. It contains detailed articles on the Hakka, Hmong, Hui, Jewish in China, Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, Filipinos, etc, and has specific articles on each of these diaspora groups in specific countries such as Hungary, Japan, Canada, the US, Denmark, Russia, Australia, etc. Cheers. DHN ( talk) 18:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Australian Barnstar of National Merit | |
For your excellent work on expanding the Ethiopian Australian article! Matilda talk 22:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
this WikiAward was given to CaliforniaAliBaba by Matilda talk on 22:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) |
Hi, I am really impressed and thankful for you contributions to the article Bolivians in the United Kingdom, I am looking to improve other articles in this way, have you got any particulat websites or sources that would help me to be able to exapnd the UK ethnic group articles. Thanks. Stevvvv4444 talk on 20:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
我是台灣人,不明白英語和越南語,希望你可以創建「 Vietnamese Migrant Workers and Brides Office」(越南外勞配偶辦公室)的條目,感恩!
-- 越南萬歲! ( talk) 20:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
-- 力道山 ( talk) 12:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
You're right. Thanks for the correction. I was too quick. Victuallers ( talk) 11:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
I did what you ask, and in my opinion, I think Skanter is not a sockpuppet of Troy86.
My reasons: If you see the contributions of Skanter [5] or any of Skanter suspected sockpuppets [6], his edits only deal with Brazilian articles and he creates useless articles of Brazilian ethnic groups. When I saw Troy86's contibutions [7] or any of his sockpuppets that you presented, his edits dealt with African/Black articles and creates useless articles about African/Black groups in any country. The pages they edit together are the ones that deal with both Africans and Brazilians, and in my opinion, it just a coincidence. Skanter has also created many pages of small European, White, or Asian ethnic groups that have been deleted Belarussian Brazilian, Canadian Brazilian, and Filipino Brazilians (note: these are the AfD pages). The other incidents that you showed me that involved CARLMART, I think the same can be applied, that it is just a coincidence. CARLMART was making articles in random, and he didn't stay in a specific topic like Skanter (Brazilians) and Troy86 (Africans).
Another reason is the IP addresses. In the suspected sockpuppets of Troy86, he has only one IP address which is 70.156.138.197. If you look at all the IP address that are suspected to be Skanter's, the numbers begin with 189 while Troy86 only IP address begins with 70. I know that some of Skanter's IPs trace to a Brazilian website, but I don't know about Troy86's IP.
This is why my conclusion is Skanter is not Troy 86. I hope my information is helpful. If you need a second opinion, you should ask Opinoso, he has dealt more with Skanter than me. Anyways, Thank you for asking my help.
Thank you for reading. Lehoiberri ( talk) 19:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
What I say is at least questionable, from a source you speak "reliable", we all know that not even the same sources are 100% safe gubernametales on the other Russians in Chile 250 citations is that? you think that source reliable? And if these are the descendants recidentes but arrived more than a century ago as it added 70,000 source said that it is also very reliable so we let the two references. Saludos-- Kusamanic ( talk) 11:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)-- Kusamanic ( talk) 11:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Upravo sam moj prvi korak u wikiju na hrvatskom jeziku, I'm learning za izmjenu cijene puno žao. pozdravi.
I just my first step in the wiki in English, I'm learning to edit cost much sorry. greetings-- Kusamanic ( talk) 10:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)-- Kusamanic ( talk) 10:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
perhaps then ethnic chinese's inherent "disambig-ness" could be rethought. apparently this term "overseas chinese" is pretty established and accepted tho it does smack of something a government somewhere came up with. come to think of it, it has a distinct POV flavor of "I'm inside china, I am what is called chinese, everyone else is someone who left or descended from someone who left." vibe, no? I didn't create the term. hey, it seems accepted and established. and I understand that the PRC has a complex relationship with ethnic chinese in other countries, as reflected in the overseas Chinese article.
Might sound weird-- and I guess this is in the article itself but-- some "ethnic" chinese persons in other counries are not in any reasonable sense "over seas". they are in various asian countries. why does this umbrella term seem to be the only one to refer to all the persons that make up these various unique populations. if you could direct me to anywhere I could learn more about this (that is, how these peoples are referred to) on or off 'pedia, that'd be awesome. thanks.
lastly for what it's worth, spoken language matters. the term "ethnic chinese" is a term that people use. (I'm not too good with the citation thing. I try to get someone in on my cause who's got those skills to find a cite.) I think it's usu in a geopolitics context. it would be silly, unclear or forcedly polite, in some conversations, especially if none of said persons are in the room to refer to them as "overseas". holler. Cogido 'll aka Huh? 18:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, could you come to the Sinitic languages article talk page and discuss, as the article's merge is gone and an article has been written. User:Kwamikagami, who wrote the article, has been re-classifying Chinese language in pretty much all articles about Chinese (i.e. Mandarin Chinese, Cantonese, Min-Nan, Old Chinese...) as well as Sino-Tibetan language-related articles. The thing I found problematic is that Kwamikagami has been classifying Sino-Tibetan languages (Chinese and Tibeto-Burman) in a way that is contrary to mainstream encyclopedia sources, like Encyclopedia Britannica [10] and Ethnologue's [11] classifications (the user also classified Bai language under his/her newly created "Sinitic" language family instead of Tibeto-Burman language family), that is why I hope you can come and discuss with us.-- TheLeopard ( talk) 21:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello! I am working on an objective alternate to notability in my userspace. Please read User:A Nobody/Inclusion guidelines and offer any suggestions on its talk page, which I will consider for revision purposes. If you do not do so, no worries, but if you wish to help, it is appreciated. Best, -- A Nobody My talk 01:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
-- 林元曌 ( talk) 20:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
-- 林元曌 ( talk) 07:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
-- 林元曌 ( talk) 07:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
hey, just to let you know i spent alot of time and effort on this article and used all my information from an issue of the economist magazine i had. id apreciate it if yu could revert the edits again. thankyou user:megastrike14 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.136.37 ( talk • contribs) 00:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC
Hello
I got the information from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of the Republic of Korea. Funnily, it was stated in the following paragraph where the information came from, but yet you stated that I did not cite a reference?
Anyhow, I've added reference numbers including a good hyperlink. See if that's fine with you? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhoos ( talk • contribs) 21:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
用戶 User:阮明珠是在維護和修正 Peter Nguyen和 Vietnamese people in Taiwan的條目,可是你卻惡意回退 User:阮明珠的貢獻,我看你才是破壞者!-- 阮明惠 ( talk) 14:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm curious why I always see you making the text of {{
cent}} more compact, and sometimes a bit confusing for me. Can't users just set a width=
or similar, that way those who want a narrow banner can have one, but those with larger resolutions can have it set to regular. Which is still pretty narrow to begin with. Thanks for your time,
§hep
Talk 00:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Further down, it states:
As of 2006, the Hoa became the largest ethnic minority in Vietnam, with figures of 2.3 million.[3]
I think this article contradicts itself. I noticed that, but added just in case. Umm, yeah, I do NOT know. My ba is an Hoa but left the country way back in 1977 for bustling Los Angeles. ★ Dasani★ 02:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Given the probable sockpuppetry from the users who have vandalized your user page, I'd recommend you to file a report at WP:SSP (and especially while they're still on their blocks!). Cheers, — sephiroth bcr ( converse) 08:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
I've been bold :) -- lucasbfr talk 12:56, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution to the April Fool's Day fun! Royal broil 00:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for this article! I've nominated it for DYK. Vmenkov ( talk) 06:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Great work on this article! An old advisor of mine, Loretta Kim (currently at SUNY Albany) is active in Xibe language revitalization projects and has told me about this newspaper before; great to see it on WP. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 15:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
[12] I agree your edit. I 100% support your edit. thanks. Cherry Blossom OK ( talk) 11:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you add
defamatory content once again, as you did to
Chinese people, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Meitoufu (
talk) 11:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC) —
Meitoufu (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.