Do you need to have your page User:Bullenwächter/Test1 on the category "Ancient Germanic Peoples"? It doesn't look serious...
Hi Andreas. I've just done some work on this article, but there are a couple of passages that I couldn't understand. I've taken them out and put them on the Talk:Lentienses page. I'd be very grateful if you could let me know what you meant by them, so that I can rewrite them and put them back in the article. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:25, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. I've looked at the material that you left on the talk page. I was still a little unsure about the second sentence; could you check the main Lentienses article to make sure that I've understood you correctly? Many thanks. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:26, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Please feel free to send me the text to look at. And if I ever have the courage to try translating any of my work into German, perhaps I could send it to you? (Don't worry — it won't happen soon, if at all.) . Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:11, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I've now worked on all four articles mentioned on your User page; it would be good if you could look at them to make sure that I haven't made any factual errors. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:05, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Ah, yes, I wondered about castle. Perhaps I'll just add more detail; see what you think. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:20, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I've just edited the Francisca and Iller articles; there's just one sentence in the former that I don't understand, which I've copied to Talk:Francisca. Could you check the main articles too, in case I've made any errors? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:06, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
The articles seem to be OK -- Bullenwächter ( talk) 07:56, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Bullenwächter! Glad you liked it. Won't be able to dig up the notes for a few days yet; will also see if I can find any purely academic references to it. Will be in touch sometime in January. Merry Christmas! Fergananim ( talk) 03:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC) Hi! Thank you! -- Bullenwächter ( talk) 20:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter
I looked over your article, and I corrected what I was able to. I do have a question though; It said The collected his information from archives...Was the 'the' supposed to be meaning that someone collected his information? Or was it supposed to be 'the'. I hope you succeed with your article, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Bullenwächter, I saw your picture of the Husbäke man, I noticed it was a little dark, would it be okay with you if I edited it to make it brighter? Thank you, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
What do you think about it? -- Bullenwächter ( talk) 20:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
-- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you, Bullenwächter, I am working on a userspace for the List of bog bodies, and I was wondering if since you seen to know a lot about bog bodies, if you could maybe tell me if the the bog body in the link that I have attached is that of the "Mädchen von Röst". [1] Thank you, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 23:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Bullenwachter, the userspace that we were working on I had publicly moved under List of bog bodies on the English wiki. Thanks agian for your help! -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that the Rost Girl was discovered in 1926, and the picture of her might have had its copyright expired, and could be used as a {{pd|old}}. Because I'm still learning about images, do you think you could help me by uploading the image? Thank you, GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 18:28, 3 July 2011
I noticed that the entries for the Peiting Woman and the Skrydstrup Woman on the Bog body list... were they different people or the smame person?? Anyway, I'd really like to thank you for your help on the list...
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your help on the List of bog bodies when I really needed it! GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 22:34, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |
I came across this image of some bog remains at the Landesmuseum Natur und Mensch. Could it be that of Damendorf 1884, Damendorf 1934, Husbäke 1931, Dätgen 1906 or Brammer man 1906?-- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 22:09, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Okay Andi!
I'll look over it as soon as possible!
Auf Wiederzerhen!
--
GouramiWatcher
(Gulp)
17:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Andi,
I've uploaded some fair use images of some bog bodies for the English Wikipedia, but I would like to have them on the German Wikipedia as well. Do you thing you could help me?
Hi. Some of the images I already uploaded to commons such as Yde Face Reco, Emmer-Erfscheindenveen Man but they have been deleted as I was not able to get a proper permission from the Drents Museum in Assen Netherlands where I get the photos. That was a pitty. As far as I know fair use taged images can be used in the English WP, but not in the German WP for local copyright regulations, which are much more strict. Images can be enterd into the German Wikipedia when they are uploaded at commons. In the German WP we can use images only with a written permission from the author/photographer/painter or when he died more than 70 year ago.-- Bullenwächter ( talk) 15:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Unfortunately not. Also small and low resolution copies of copyrighted materials are protected by the copyright, except when the image has been substantially edited so that it turns into an own creative work, but that is hard to reach with images of bog bodies as. Copyright is such a difficoult issue. For example the image File:Moora Digital Face Reconstruction.jpg has been made with a modern facial composite software usted by Kriminalpolizei. The software contains thousands of different images of face components which have been made/edited by many different people, this components can be rendered to a complete image. I guess there was not only one single person working on Mooras face reconstruction image, additionally the background or purpose of the image is not to be an artwork but it is an scientific illustration and still is is copyright protected. Even a X-ray image of the Kayhausen Boy has been deleted on commons as it was classifed as an copyright protected artwork ;-( Sometimes it is hard for me to understand the borderline between a copyright protected (art)wortk and a free work. I think one has to be a lawyer for that.... Have a nice sunday -- Bullenwächter ( talk) 07:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article Tschüs-- Amy Z ( talk) 05:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Andi, I looked at your article and all it really needed was a few commas or apostrophes. I'd advise you to add more to the blank section Publications. Tag!
Hallo Men Freund! A few weeks ago I had found a very good image of the Skrystrup Woman in the Commons or Wikipedia, but when I added an entry about her on the mummy article, I could not find that image. Could you help me please? Bis dann, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 00:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
-- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 18:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
I do have just one other question about Windeby I. The picture File:Windeby I bones.jpg shows the bones of the mummy, so did the actual corpse decompose? Or were they just replicas? I'm a little confused about this. Danke schön, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 23:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Although I agree entirely about the use of the word Tschüs, the article is still completely unsourced and as it stands is WP:OR. If it is not referenced soon, my fear is that it may be in line for deletion. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 06:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
On second thoughts, I realised that there is an entry for this on Wiktionary, so I've made a soft redirect. Feel free to improve or expand the Wiktionary entry. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 06:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
See Talk:Mike Parker Pearson, I reverted your rename as WP:COMMONNAME is clear that the most common usage should be used when choosing the name of an article. Having done that I also reverted the changes you made to articles linking to Pearson. I hope you are OK with that, but if you aren't please discuss on the article's talk page as any rename back to Michael would clearly need discussing as a controversial move. Thanks. -- Bob Re-born ( talk) 10:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Andi! Because I am not as knowledgeable about bog bodies as you, I fear I may have miss titled the image File:Nederfrederikmose Tunic.jpg which may come from a completely different bog body. Would you know the answer? Tschuss, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 03:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Hallo mein Freund,
I've been working on a new organization for the English article for the bog body list at
User:Gourami Watcher/list of bog bodies. I'm looking for the city/town state that the bog body was found although my resources are limited. Would you help me on this please? Danke schön. --
GouramiWatcher
(Gulp)
01:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to have for the location section of each bog body the state that it was found in, for example, Windeby I would have, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Bis Dann! -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis [3] [4], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.
I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.
Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)
To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=82379912 ( HTTPS).
Best Regards, Michael Tsikerdekis ( talk) 08:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.
UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. -- Michael Tsikerdekis ( talk) 08:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Research Participation Barnstar | ||
For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis ( talk) 12:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hello, here You've requested translation for image description. I managed to translate the first sentence, but I don't know what the ghost lines are. Can You please explain this to me, so I can continue with translation? -- Murúg ( talk) 13:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, unfortunately I can't read or write German. I saw the images in Wikimedia Commons, and noticed that they didn't have an article in English or French. I ran the German site through Google translate, and I put up what came out, with grammar corrections. That's all I know about the burial site, even a Google search didn't turn up much... Oaktree b ( talk) 02:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. Thank you for your nice work on various archaeology-related articles. The pictures are great, too! We could use more of your good work at the DYK section on Wikipedia's MainPage. I have nominated two of your recent articles. You can see the nominations at T:TDYK#Tangendorf disk brooch and at T:TDYK#Duvensee paddle. DYK reviewers may have questions or ask for more footnotes, etc., so please be encouraged to join the discussion there. Please also be encouraged to nominate your upcoming wikiarticles for DYK. Thank you. -- PFHLai ( talk) 16:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
You may find {{ Translated page}} useful. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Duvensee paddle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PumpkinSky talk 18:19, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
On 14 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Duvensee paddle, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Duvensee paddle (pictured) on display at the Archaeological Museum Hamburg is the world's second oldest known paddle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Duvensee paddle. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 16:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
archeological treasures | |
Thank you for sharing your knowledge in quality articles such as Duvensee paddle and Tangendorf disk brooch, you are an awesome Wikipedian! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you soo much! -- Bullenwächter ( talk) 14:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. Thank you your additions to this article. Can we have more footnotes, please? Thanks in advance. -- PFHLai ( talk) 02:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
On 26 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tangendorf disk brooch, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the round symbol on the coat of arms (pictured) of Toppenstedt represents the Tangendorf disk brooch, an Iron Age fibula discovered at a Bronze Age tumulus in the German municipality in 1930? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tangendorf disk brooch. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wijnand van der Sanden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wijnand van der Sanden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Slashme ( talk) 15:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I just wrote Forsbrook Pendant and thought it might interest you. Hope you are well; good wishes for 2013. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
This is work in progress, see User:Richiez/Drafts. Not sure where I would fit the image in the new structure. Richiez ( talk) 11:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
You might enjoy Archaeology of Kosovo, which someone I'm mentoring started today. May be you or one of your friends could kindly translate it into German? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roeland Paardekooper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roeland Paardekooper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 00:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hallo Andi,
I came across this very recent moorleiche documentary that premiered yesterday in the U.S. As I send you this, I am just starting it. It's in English, but I hope you enjoy it. [5]
Tschüss! -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 02:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I recently saw the Aymestrey burial in a small museum, so of course I wrote an article, and thought you might like it. I trust you are well, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
archeological treasures
Thank you for sharing your knowledge in quality articles such as
Duvensee paddle and
Tangendorf disk brooch, you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
Two years ago, you were the 246th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Four years ago, you were recipient no. 246 of Precious, a prize of QAI! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
-- GouramiWatcher (?) 01:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
On the Puttee article, I see you added a photo of a bog body with leg coverings. Are these really puttees? They don't appear to match the description in the article. Could you add some text to connect the photo subject? -- Theodore Kloba ( talk) 16:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Kartëhl, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Uricdivine
TalkToMe
19:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to Mëkanïk Dëstruktïẁ Kömmandöh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 16:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kartëhl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 07:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Kartëhl".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Do you need to have your page User:Bullenwächter/Test1 on the category "Ancient Germanic Peoples"? It doesn't look serious...
Hi Andreas. I've just done some work on this article, but there are a couple of passages that I couldn't understand. I've taken them out and put them on the Talk:Lentienses page. I'd be very grateful if you could let me know what you meant by them, so that I can rewrite them and put them back in the article. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:25, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. I've looked at the material that you left on the talk page. I was still a little unsure about the second sentence; could you check the main Lentienses article to make sure that I've understood you correctly? Many thanks. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:26, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Please feel free to send me the text to look at. And if I ever have the courage to try translating any of my work into German, perhaps I could send it to you? (Don't worry — it won't happen soon, if at all.) . Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:11, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I've now worked on all four articles mentioned on your User page; it would be good if you could look at them to make sure that I haven't made any factual errors. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:05, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Ah, yes, I wondered about castle. Perhaps I'll just add more detail; see what you think. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:20, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I've just edited the Francisca and Iller articles; there's just one sentence in the former that I don't understand, which I've copied to Talk:Francisca. Could you check the main articles too, in case I've made any errors? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:06, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
The articles seem to be OK -- Bullenwächter ( talk) 07:56, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Bullenwächter! Glad you liked it. Won't be able to dig up the notes for a few days yet; will also see if I can find any purely academic references to it. Will be in touch sometime in January. Merry Christmas! Fergananim ( talk) 03:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC) Hi! Thank you! -- Bullenwächter ( talk) 20:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter
I looked over your article, and I corrected what I was able to. I do have a question though; It said The collected his information from archives...Was the 'the' supposed to be meaning that someone collected his information? Or was it supposed to be 'the'. I hope you succeed with your article, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Bullenwächter, I saw your picture of the Husbäke man, I noticed it was a little dark, would it be okay with you if I edited it to make it brighter? Thank you, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
What do you think about it? -- Bullenwächter ( talk) 20:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
-- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you, Bullenwächter, I am working on a userspace for the List of bog bodies, and I was wondering if since you seen to know a lot about bog bodies, if you could maybe tell me if the the bog body in the link that I have attached is that of the "Mädchen von Röst". [1] Thank you, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 23:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Bullenwachter, the userspace that we were working on I had publicly moved under List of bog bodies on the English wiki. Thanks agian for your help! -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that the Rost Girl was discovered in 1926, and the picture of her might have had its copyright expired, and could be used as a {{pd|old}}. Because I'm still learning about images, do you think you could help me by uploading the image? Thank you, GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 18:28, 3 July 2011
I noticed that the entries for the Peiting Woman and the Skrydstrup Woman on the Bog body list... were they different people or the smame person?? Anyway, I'd really like to thank you for your help on the list...
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your help on the List of bog bodies when I really needed it! GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 22:34, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |
I came across this image of some bog remains at the Landesmuseum Natur und Mensch. Could it be that of Damendorf 1884, Damendorf 1934, Husbäke 1931, Dätgen 1906 or Brammer man 1906?-- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 22:09, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Okay Andi!
I'll look over it as soon as possible!
Auf Wiederzerhen!
--
GouramiWatcher
(Gulp)
17:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Andi,
I've uploaded some fair use images of some bog bodies for the English Wikipedia, but I would like to have them on the German Wikipedia as well. Do you thing you could help me?
Hi. Some of the images I already uploaded to commons such as Yde Face Reco, Emmer-Erfscheindenveen Man but they have been deleted as I was not able to get a proper permission from the Drents Museum in Assen Netherlands where I get the photos. That was a pitty. As far as I know fair use taged images can be used in the English WP, but not in the German WP for local copyright regulations, which are much more strict. Images can be enterd into the German Wikipedia when they are uploaded at commons. In the German WP we can use images only with a written permission from the author/photographer/painter or when he died more than 70 year ago.-- Bullenwächter ( talk) 15:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Unfortunately not. Also small and low resolution copies of copyrighted materials are protected by the copyright, except when the image has been substantially edited so that it turns into an own creative work, but that is hard to reach with images of bog bodies as. Copyright is such a difficoult issue. For example the image File:Moora Digital Face Reconstruction.jpg has been made with a modern facial composite software usted by Kriminalpolizei. The software contains thousands of different images of face components which have been made/edited by many different people, this components can be rendered to a complete image. I guess there was not only one single person working on Mooras face reconstruction image, additionally the background or purpose of the image is not to be an artwork but it is an scientific illustration and still is is copyright protected. Even a X-ray image of the Kayhausen Boy has been deleted on commons as it was classifed as an copyright protected artwork ;-( Sometimes it is hard for me to understand the borderline between a copyright protected (art)wortk and a free work. I think one has to be a lawyer for that.... Have a nice sunday -- Bullenwächter ( talk) 07:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article Tschüs-- Amy Z ( talk) 05:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Andi, I looked at your article and all it really needed was a few commas or apostrophes. I'd advise you to add more to the blank section Publications. Tag!
Hallo Men Freund! A few weeks ago I had found a very good image of the Skrystrup Woman in the Commons or Wikipedia, but when I added an entry about her on the mummy article, I could not find that image. Could you help me please? Bis dann, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 00:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
-- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 18:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
I do have just one other question about Windeby I. The picture File:Windeby I bones.jpg shows the bones of the mummy, so did the actual corpse decompose? Or were they just replicas? I'm a little confused about this. Danke schön, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 23:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Although I agree entirely about the use of the word Tschüs, the article is still completely unsourced and as it stands is WP:OR. If it is not referenced soon, my fear is that it may be in line for deletion. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 06:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
On second thoughts, I realised that there is an entry for this on Wiktionary, so I've made a soft redirect. Feel free to improve or expand the Wiktionary entry. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 06:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
See Talk:Mike Parker Pearson, I reverted your rename as WP:COMMONNAME is clear that the most common usage should be used when choosing the name of an article. Having done that I also reverted the changes you made to articles linking to Pearson. I hope you are OK with that, but if you aren't please discuss on the article's talk page as any rename back to Michael would clearly need discussing as a controversial move. Thanks. -- Bob Re-born ( talk) 10:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Andi! Because I am not as knowledgeable about bog bodies as you, I fear I may have miss titled the image File:Nederfrederikmose Tunic.jpg which may come from a completely different bog body. Would you know the answer? Tschuss, -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 03:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Hallo mein Freund,
I've been working on a new organization for the English article for the bog body list at
User:Gourami Watcher/list of bog bodies. I'm looking for the city/town state that the bog body was found although my resources are limited. Would you help me on this please? Danke schön. --
GouramiWatcher
(Gulp)
01:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to have for the location section of each bog body the state that it was found in, for example, Windeby I would have, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Bis Dann! -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis [3] [4], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.
I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.
Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)
To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=82379912 ( HTTPS).
Best Regards, Michael Tsikerdekis ( talk) 08:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.
UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. -- Michael Tsikerdekis ( talk) 08:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Research Participation Barnstar | ||
For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis ( talk) 12:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hello, here You've requested translation for image description. I managed to translate the first sentence, but I don't know what the ghost lines are. Can You please explain this to me, so I can continue with translation? -- Murúg ( talk) 13:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, unfortunately I can't read or write German. I saw the images in Wikimedia Commons, and noticed that they didn't have an article in English or French. I ran the German site through Google translate, and I put up what came out, with grammar corrections. That's all I know about the burial site, even a Google search didn't turn up much... Oaktree b ( talk) 02:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. Thank you for your nice work on various archaeology-related articles. The pictures are great, too! We could use more of your good work at the DYK section on Wikipedia's MainPage. I have nominated two of your recent articles. You can see the nominations at T:TDYK#Tangendorf disk brooch and at T:TDYK#Duvensee paddle. DYK reviewers may have questions or ask for more footnotes, etc., so please be encouraged to join the discussion there. Please also be encouraged to nominate your upcoming wikiarticles for DYK. Thank you. -- PFHLai ( talk) 16:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
You may find {{ Translated page}} useful. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Duvensee paddle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PumpkinSky talk 18:19, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
On 14 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Duvensee paddle, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Duvensee paddle (pictured) on display at the Archaeological Museum Hamburg is the world's second oldest known paddle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Duvensee paddle. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 16:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
archeological treasures | |
Thank you for sharing your knowledge in quality articles such as Duvensee paddle and Tangendorf disk brooch, you are an awesome Wikipedian! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you soo much! -- Bullenwächter ( talk) 14:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. Thank you your additions to this article. Can we have more footnotes, please? Thanks in advance. -- PFHLai ( talk) 02:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
On 26 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tangendorf disk brooch, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the round symbol on the coat of arms (pictured) of Toppenstedt represents the Tangendorf disk brooch, an Iron Age fibula discovered at a Bronze Age tumulus in the German municipality in 1930? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tangendorf disk brooch. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wijnand van der Sanden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wijnand van der Sanden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Slashme ( talk) 15:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I just wrote Forsbrook Pendant and thought it might interest you. Hope you are well; good wishes for 2013. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
This is work in progress, see User:Richiez/Drafts. Not sure where I would fit the image in the new structure. Richiez ( talk) 11:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
You might enjoy Archaeology of Kosovo, which someone I'm mentoring started today. May be you or one of your friends could kindly translate it into German? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roeland Paardekooper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roeland Paardekooper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 00:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hallo Andi,
I came across this very recent moorleiche documentary that premiered yesterday in the U.S. As I send you this, I am just starting it. It's in English, but I hope you enjoy it. [5]
Tschüss! -- GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 02:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I recently saw the Aymestrey burial in a small museum, so of course I wrote an article, and thought you might like it. I trust you are well, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
archeological treasures
Thank you for sharing your knowledge in quality articles such as
Duvensee paddle and
Tangendorf disk brooch, you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
Two years ago, you were the 246th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Four years ago, you were recipient no. 246 of Precious, a prize of QAI! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
-- GouramiWatcher (?) 01:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
On the Puttee article, I see you added a photo of a bog body with leg coverings. Are these really puttees? They don't appear to match the description in the article. Could you add some text to connect the photo subject? -- Theodore Kloba ( talk) 16:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Kartëhl, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Uricdivine
TalkToMe
19:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to Mëkanïk Dëstruktïẁ Kömmandöh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 16:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kartëhl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 07:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Bullenwächter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Kartëhl".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)