From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, BritishTiger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

July 2021

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger versus Lion, you may be blocked from editing. KejuFuru ( talk) 04:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tiger versus Lion, you may be blocked from editing. Do not leave unexplained edits KejuFuru ( talk) 04:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Zudo ( talkcontribs) 08:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger versus Lion. You are constantly using deprecated (unreliable) sources. There is a good reason your edit's tag says that. Due to this, your edits have become necessary to revert, research more about 'use of deprecated (unreliable) source' to know what sources not to add to a Wikipedia page. If you want your edits to stay on the 'Tiger versus Lion' page, you need to remove those unreliable sources, and for that, you need to research about it. This is your last warning! This will probably help - /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Deprecated_sources KejuFuru ( talk) 04:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply

KejuFuru You are in no way to tell him that. You also obviously have no idea how to use wikipedia. Just because a single source out of many sources he put in is "unreliable" doesn't mean you have to revert so many changes to the article for one thing. Pretty ridiculous. Tijkil ( talk) 08:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply

So he has to remove the unreliable source, you didn’t get what I was trying to say Tijkil KejuFuru ( talk) 10:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply

@ KejuFuru and Tijkil: Guys, let's be careful here. This is Wikipedia, where we have to be as WP:Neutral as possible, not like those forums, where we can technically fight our spirits out! Just now, BritishTiger got temporarily blocked from treating Wiki like a forum, so let's take this as warning, and try to be as nice as possible to each other, OK? Leo1pard ( talk) 18:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Leo1pard: Actually, they were blocked for disruptive editing... and to be honest, the rest of you are behaving in a similar way at times. -- Longhair\ talk 18:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply
I explained why I removed the accounts by Talk section of Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by BritishTiger ( talkcontribs)
Read what an edit summary is here. And please begin signing your posts. You've been advised how below previously. The advice above is correct, Wikipedia is not a forum and you're expected to behave a little more appropriately here. -- Longhair\ talk 19:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Take a look at this edit here of yours and click the link where it says Tag: use of deprecated (unreliable) source. You will be blocked again if you insist on ignoring the information that is being provided to you. -- Longhair\ talk 10:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Signing your edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Longhair\ talk 20:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

July 2021

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Longhair\ talk 10:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BritishTiger ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Not the only person to disruptive editting, gave reasons why I removed unreliable sources in the talk page/edit section, not explained why the sources I used were unreliable BritishTiger ( talk) 10:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You're not blocked as your previous block has expired. -- Longhair\ talk 10:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2021

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages ( Tiger versus lion) for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Longhair\ talk 11:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BritishTiger ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I just fixed the vandalism caused by KejuFuru, once unblocked I assumed I could go back to editing Wikipedia BritishTiger ( talk) 15:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You contributed to the disruption of that article. You may still edit elsewhere, and contribute to the article talk page, where you should discuss any issues. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 18:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BritishTiger ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I am confused why KejuFuru didn't get any punishment for doing equal or even more severe offenses, he thus equally contributed to the disruption too, as it clearly takes at least two people to cause an edit war. BritishTiger ( talk) 18:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request; see WP:NOTTHEM. Further frivolous unblock requests will result in the loss of your ability to edit this page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, BritishTiger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

July 2021

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger versus Lion, you may be blocked from editing. KejuFuru ( talk) 04:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tiger versus Lion, you may be blocked from editing. Do not leave unexplained edits KejuFuru ( talk) 04:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Zudo ( talkcontribs) 08:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger versus Lion. You are constantly using deprecated (unreliable) sources. There is a good reason your edit's tag says that. Due to this, your edits have become necessary to revert, research more about 'use of deprecated (unreliable) source' to know what sources not to add to a Wikipedia page. If you want your edits to stay on the 'Tiger versus Lion' page, you need to remove those unreliable sources, and for that, you need to research about it. This is your last warning! This will probably help - /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Deprecated_sources KejuFuru ( talk) 04:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply

KejuFuru You are in no way to tell him that. You also obviously have no idea how to use wikipedia. Just because a single source out of many sources he put in is "unreliable" doesn't mean you have to revert so many changes to the article for one thing. Pretty ridiculous. Tijkil ( talk) 08:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply

So he has to remove the unreliable source, you didn’t get what I was trying to say Tijkil KejuFuru ( talk) 10:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply

@ KejuFuru and Tijkil: Guys, let's be careful here. This is Wikipedia, where we have to be as WP:Neutral as possible, not like those forums, where we can technically fight our spirits out! Just now, BritishTiger got temporarily blocked from treating Wiki like a forum, so let's take this as warning, and try to be as nice as possible to each other, OK? Leo1pard ( talk) 18:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Leo1pard: Actually, they were blocked for disruptive editing... and to be honest, the rest of you are behaving in a similar way at times. -- Longhair\ talk 18:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply
I explained why I removed the accounts by Talk section of Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by BritishTiger ( talkcontribs)
Read what an edit summary is here. And please begin signing your posts. You've been advised how below previously. The advice above is correct, Wikipedia is not a forum and you're expected to behave a little more appropriately here. -- Longhair\ talk 19:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Take a look at this edit here of yours and click the link where it says Tag: use of deprecated (unreliable) source. You will be blocked again if you insist on ignoring the information that is being provided to you. -- Longhair\ talk 10:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Signing your edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Longhair\ talk 20:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

July 2021

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Longhair\ talk 10:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BritishTiger ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Not the only person to disruptive editting, gave reasons why I removed unreliable sources in the talk page/edit section, not explained why the sources I used were unreliable BritishTiger ( talk) 10:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You're not blocked as your previous block has expired. -- Longhair\ talk 10:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2021

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages ( Tiger versus lion) for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Longhair\ talk 11:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BritishTiger ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I just fixed the vandalism caused by KejuFuru, once unblocked I assumed I could go back to editing Wikipedia BritishTiger ( talk) 15:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You contributed to the disruption of that article. You may still edit elsewhere, and contribute to the article talk page, where you should discuss any issues. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 18:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BritishTiger ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I am confused why KejuFuru didn't get any punishment for doing equal or even more severe offenses, he thus equally contributed to the disruption too, as it clearly takes at least two people to cause an edit war. BritishTiger ( talk) 18:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request; see WP:NOTTHEM. Further frivolous unblock requests will result in the loss of your ability to edit this page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook