![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
General info
Lead
Content
Tone and Balance
Sources and References
Organization
Images and Media
Info Box
Overall Impressions
Emma.mae16 ( talk) 12:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Emma.mae16
The Lead sentence concisely and accurately defines the topic. The lead does include descriptions of the major sections, although they seem to be very succinct and offer a very general overview. I would recommend looking at ways to describe the information in the article while avoiding being overly general. The content of the article seems to suit well to the article as a whole. However, I would recommend using your cited sources differently, as some sources are used in the summaries, and some are not. There doesn’t seem to be anything missing from the article. I would try to expand upon the reception of the novel/book by the public as it is important to the overall idea of the success the author has with this particular work. There are no problems with tone within the article. Very good use of neutral tone in the themes section. There are many references and some sources that are well-used. The article does have some spelling errors. There were no obvious grammar errors. The article has four relevant sections, but the "see also" section seems to be just tacked onto the end to fulfill the requirement. There is no image in the article. I would recommend finding an image of the book's cover that is acceptable to Wikipedia and the copyright restrictions. There is an infobox present that has all of the necessary information. Timothy Wales 22:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tb3m555 ( talk • contribs)
Garrett's Peer review:
/info/en/?search=User:Scucchiara01/Flowers_of_Mold/GarrettTonos_Peer_Review
Brady956 (
talk)
22:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey guys, my apologies if you couldn't access my peer review. I did not know it was so hard to find. Here is a link to it, in case you want to check it over. /info/en/?search=User:Scucchiara01/Flowers_of_Mold/GarrettTonos_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
General info
Lead
Content
Tone and Balance
Sources and References
Organization
Images and Media
Info Box
Overall Impressions
Emma.mae16 ( talk) 12:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Emma.mae16
The Lead sentence concisely and accurately defines the topic. The lead does include descriptions of the major sections, although they seem to be very succinct and offer a very general overview. I would recommend looking at ways to describe the information in the article while avoiding being overly general. The content of the article seems to suit well to the article as a whole. However, I would recommend using your cited sources differently, as some sources are used in the summaries, and some are not. There doesn’t seem to be anything missing from the article. I would try to expand upon the reception of the novel/book by the public as it is important to the overall idea of the success the author has with this particular work. There are no problems with tone within the article. Very good use of neutral tone in the themes section. There are many references and some sources that are well-used. The article does have some spelling errors. There were no obvious grammar errors. The article has four relevant sections, but the "see also" section seems to be just tacked onto the end to fulfill the requirement. There is no image in the article. I would recommend finding an image of the book's cover that is acceptable to Wikipedia and the copyright restrictions. There is an infobox present that has all of the necessary information. Timothy Wales 22:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tb3m555 ( talk • contribs)
Garrett's Peer review:
/info/en/?search=User:Scucchiara01/Flowers_of_Mold/GarrettTonos_Peer_Review
Brady956 (
talk)
22:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey guys, my apologies if you couldn't access my peer review. I did not know it was so hard to find. Here is a link to it, in case you want to check it over. /info/en/?search=User:Scucchiara01/Flowers_of_Mold/GarrettTonos_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review