This user is clearly a vandal. The user's entries make as much sense as the "typing" of a cat walking across a keyboard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.203.147 ( talk) 23:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
A {{
prod}} template has been added to the article
Svalisth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{
db-author}}.
Fabrictramp
14:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Theory. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Sander Säde
13:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Theory. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Corvus cornix (
talk)
00:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Theory, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Theory was changed by Bobvq (c) (t) deleting 18821 characters on 2008-01-02T19:18:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 19:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Stone wall. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stone wall was changed by Bobvq (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-02T19:21:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 19:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
This user is clearly a vandal. The user's entries make as much sense as the "typing" of a cat walking across a keyboard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.203.147 ( talk) 23:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
A {{
prod}} template has been added to the article
Svalisth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{
db-author}}.
Fabrictramp
14:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Theory. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Sander Säde
13:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Theory. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Corvus cornix (
talk)
00:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Theory, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Theory was changed by Bobvq (c) (t) deleting 18821 characters on 2008-01-02T19:18:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 19:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Stone wall. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stone wall was changed by Bobvq (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-02T19:21:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 19:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)