Hello! Your submission of
Swash (typography) at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Mackensen
(talk)
15:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 6 September 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Swash (typography), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Phil Martin was accused of "typographic incest" for redesigning the font Helvetica with swashes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Swash (typography). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
That's some good stuff on Finder (software)! You inspired me and you wrote some insightful and well cited (with good citation format) stuff. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 12:24, 7 September 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hello! Blythwood,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Fiddle
Faddle
21:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
|
Thanks for the dilegence improving typographical subjects. Gill Sans in particular is much more coherent. Being a fan of open source/public domain typefaces, I appreciate your related content. Cpoakes ( talk) 12:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Swash (typography) at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Mackensen
(talk)
15:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 6 September 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Swash (typography), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Phil Martin was accused of "typographic incest" for redesigning the font Helvetica with swashes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Swash (typography). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
That's some good stuff on Finder (software)! You inspired me and you wrote some insightful and well cited (with good citation format) stuff. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 12:24, 7 September 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hello! Blythwood,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Fiddle
Faddle
21:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
|
Thanks for the dilegence improving typographical subjects. Gill Sans in particular is much more coherent. Being a fan of open source/public domain typefaces, I appreciate your related content. Cpoakes ( talk) 12:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)