![]() |
Hi Bloomdoom2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC) |
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
Free 6LACK. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you still want to remove it, please discuss and obtain consensus on the talk page.
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
08:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Bloomdoom2,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as
JayPe (
talk ·
contribs). Our
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be
blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. If you have been blocked for something, socking is usually not a good way to get around it. Sometimes, it helps to admit that you are wrong and try to fix your mistakes.
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
08:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
You made this in the Under Pressure (album) article and other hip hop articles, it unnecessary to link common phrase as "rapper" and "recording artist" because it doesn't really need to be linked because a majority of readers would already understand this basic concept, and we try to avoid those sorts of links to avoid "overload" for the reader. Don't follow edits made by some disruptive IPs. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 21:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Bloomdoom2. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Exemplo347 ( talk) 21:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
You made this to the article, you linked the rapper Nav but the problem is, it's just a redirect to a article with very little information of him, it's just his name on it that's pretty much it, that's kinda misleading to readers who want get more info of this rapper. If you're planning to create a article about him, I suggest to created the article first then linking his name back to the article, because for now it's just a pointless redirect. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 18:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
You made this edit to Big Sean discography here, Can you explain to me why did you remove his guest appearances? JustDoItFettyg ( talk) 22:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Bounce Back (Big Sean song), without citing a
reliable source using an
inline citation that clearly supports the material. The
burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
01:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Smash David. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your addition
here of
Lee on the Beats as a producer was not supported by the source cited.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
23:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
You should learn to trust other editors, or at least do some your own research other than to fully rely on the sourceThis isn't how stuff works here though. While we trust editors, an inline citation is always necessary to comply with WP:V - and in fact, that is how we build up trust. Any information added, needs to have a source and this is not optional. Remember that our goal here is verifiability, not truth. If you are adding any credits/chat info and you do not have the citation with you, wait until you can find a citation. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 00:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xboxmanwar. Thank you.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
04:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Free 6LACK.
This edit added a bunch of unsourced information.
WP:V is a policy and we require reliable secondary sources. Please do not restore it.
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
10:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Cozy Tapes Vol. 1: Friends. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
You clearly have a problem understanding what WP:CONSENSUS is. You need consensus to remove the template and you need to demonstrate consensus. And the correct way is to start a talk page discussion. I do not see any consensus at this moment, so I am going to ask you to self revert this edit. If you want to debate, use the talk page, not edit summaries to do it. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:42, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
No problem. I have been busy as well. But now I understand your reasoning behind your edits. I will reply later today and explain more. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 04:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
You made this in the article, but the problem is that this section is already in the "Bounce Back" article, so you clearly copied it and paste it in the I Decided article. We don't copied text from other articles in Wikipedia ( WP:COPYWITHIN). And besides, that section had more to do with the track itself instead the album. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 21:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TheGoodPerry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Night. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
I was wondering if its correct to put his name with a "S" instead of a "$", its a bit confusing. From what ive seen in other articles for example : " The Buffet" or " Khalifa" his name is used in the stylized form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32zel ( talk • contribs) 05:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Kodak Black.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
00:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want this article to be moved to All-Amerikkkan Badass, requested at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests to have the article moved. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 19:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
For being collaborative and providing quality info in hip hop articles .
32zel ( talk) 03:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC) |
Do not upload higher resolution versions of non-free files. Our non-free content criteria require the use of low resolution images. Uploading a higher resolution constitutes a copyright violation. ~ Rob13 Talk 03:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't mean to discredit your claims and what not, but here it shows only Atlantic as the distributor for the project, not Dollaz N Dealz/Sniper Gang. Therefore I believe that Atlantic should only be credited as distributor for the album. Thanks. LilNumerator ( talk) 10:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Painting Pictures, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
10:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
At Painting Pictures, you added names for the writers of each song. What was your source? Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 10:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
21:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Kodak Black. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
21:11, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's
policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in
loss of editing privileges. Instagram is not a RS, why re arrange the names?
L3X1
(distant write)
21:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Kodak Black.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
22:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
Thanks for all your work on Kodak Black article and hip hop related. Kakashi123456789 ( talk) 16:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC) |
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Russ (rapper).
Magnolia677 (
talk)
11:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Russ (rapper). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing.
This edit summary was unacceptable and a personal attack.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
15:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
With this edit you reverted my previous edit to Drowning (A Boogie wit da Hoodie song), a new article you created. You left the edit summary "This edit is unacceptable, removing big amounts of info, and you didn't even look at the damn sources."
The unsourced information I removed included:
To support these edits, you cited the following:
I was not able to support the edits listed above from the sources you cited. Could you please identify where in these sources they are supported? Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 18:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Please don't link EarDrummers Entertainment in the track listings because it doesn't have its own article or do these artists. It's just lead to a section of music producers with very little information. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 20:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Grateful (DJ Khaled album), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Neither "Kodak Black" nor "Dieuson Octave" is listed as a writer. The source you cited
here (which is a duplicate of the track listing linked to at the top of the section), states only "Ft. Kodak Black" on tracks 13 and 17. Please stop adding unsourced content. To avoid an edit war with you, I will also start a discussion on the article's talk page.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
09:53, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Ctrl (SZA album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
10:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Travis Scott discography.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
19:44, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Grateful (DJ Khaled album).
Magnolia677 (
talk)
18:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ronhjones
(Talk)
21:01, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Bloomdoom2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
@ Ronhjones:, Magnolia677 reported me yesterday, which was declined. Reporting me for the same thing when it was already declined is unfair, please unblock me. Thank you. Bloomdoom2 ( talk) 21:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As below, you were reported for something else. Regardless, this doesn't address your block. You need to talk about your behaviour, when requesting an unblock. In this case, you would need to show that all of your additions are properly cited. Yamla ( talk) 21:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bloomdoom2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
@ Yamla:, Magnolia677 removed the so-called "unsourced content" ( which was sourced) from Grateful, then proceeded to give me a warning and then immediately report me after, which during that time, I made no edits to that same article and any article, so it is inappropriate to give me a block since I did not add any content back to the article, and I had no time to react to what Magnolia677 did. The warning says that I may be blocked the next time I add "unsourced content", which I did not add anything, yet Magnolia677 still reported me. Given the times before to which Magnolia677 reported me countless times, this editor CLEARLY wants me blocked. Also, to note, whenever this editor is questioned about their actions regarding "unsourced content" which isn't unsourced, they don't respond, see above where the warnings in this section are shown. Thank you. Bloomdoom2 ( talk) 21:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you examine the source in the edit you are referecing, you will see that the information you added was indeed not cited there (the comment by Manny Dio was a repost of an original comment by Belly). It's clear from the fact that you are still making this argument that you do not understand how to use sources on Wikipedia, and this gives me sufficient cause for concern that I have upped the block to an indefinite one. To have the block lifted, you will need to demonstrate (not claim) that you comprehend the process for using sources on Wikipedia, in particular the process for determining whether a source is reliable or not. Yunshui 雲 水 07:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thanks for uploading File:Look at Me! Original Cover - XXXTENTACION.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Bloomdoom2, Can you help? A lot of Snoop Dogg single covers are too small or wide (one example is for From tha Chuuuch to da Palace, but one of many). Also: can you get covers for Life of da Party, Murder Was the Case (song) (remix), New York, New York (Tha Dogg Pound song), 2 of Amerikaz Most Wanted, Wrong Idea, Mission Cleopatra (song), Wiggle (song) and To the Max (song) please? Appreciate if you can.-- Theo Mandela ( talk) 15:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:PRBLMS Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MyMomentTeeGrizzley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LookAtMeRereleaseCover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 05:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Look at Me! Original Cover - XXXTENTACION.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 05:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Look at Me! - XXXTENTACION.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 05:55, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Bloomdoom2, thanks for creating The Never Story!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This album may not be Wikipedia notable. It needs to meet WP:NMUSIC and I don't see any record charting on Billboard.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 00:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ugly God is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugly God (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo ( talk) 18:37, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
here's a goat cuz you helped out with making the page for the goat XXXTENTACION
Verysadeyes (
talk)
20:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:It Takes Two by Mike Will Made It.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Bloomdoom2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC) |
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
Free 6LACK. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you still want to remove it, please discuss and obtain consensus on the talk page.
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
08:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Bloomdoom2,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as
JayPe (
talk ·
contribs). Our
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be
blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. If you have been blocked for something, socking is usually not a good way to get around it. Sometimes, it helps to admit that you are wrong and try to fix your mistakes.
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
08:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
You made this in the Under Pressure (album) article and other hip hop articles, it unnecessary to link common phrase as "rapper" and "recording artist" because it doesn't really need to be linked because a majority of readers would already understand this basic concept, and we try to avoid those sorts of links to avoid "overload" for the reader. Don't follow edits made by some disruptive IPs. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 21:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Bloomdoom2. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Exemplo347 ( talk) 21:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
You made this to the article, you linked the rapper Nav but the problem is, it's just a redirect to a article with very little information of him, it's just his name on it that's pretty much it, that's kinda misleading to readers who want get more info of this rapper. If you're planning to create a article about him, I suggest to created the article first then linking his name back to the article, because for now it's just a pointless redirect. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 18:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
You made this edit to Big Sean discography here, Can you explain to me why did you remove his guest appearances? JustDoItFettyg ( talk) 22:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Bounce Back (Big Sean song), without citing a
reliable source using an
inline citation that clearly supports the material. The
burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
01:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Smash David. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your addition
here of
Lee on the Beats as a producer was not supported by the source cited.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
23:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
You should learn to trust other editors, or at least do some your own research other than to fully rely on the sourceThis isn't how stuff works here though. While we trust editors, an inline citation is always necessary to comply with WP:V - and in fact, that is how we build up trust. Any information added, needs to have a source and this is not optional. Remember that our goal here is verifiability, not truth. If you are adding any credits/chat info and you do not have the citation with you, wait until you can find a citation. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 00:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xboxmanwar. Thank you.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
04:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Free 6LACK.
This edit added a bunch of unsourced information.
WP:V is a policy and we require reliable secondary sources. Please do not restore it.
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
10:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Cozy Tapes Vol. 1: Friends. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
You clearly have a problem understanding what WP:CONSENSUS is. You need consensus to remove the template and you need to demonstrate consensus. And the correct way is to start a talk page discussion. I do not see any consensus at this moment, so I am going to ask you to self revert this edit. If you want to debate, use the talk page, not edit summaries to do it. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:42, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
No problem. I have been busy as well. But now I understand your reasoning behind your edits. I will reply later today and explain more. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 04:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
You made this in the article, but the problem is that this section is already in the "Bounce Back" article, so you clearly copied it and paste it in the I Decided article. We don't copied text from other articles in Wikipedia ( WP:COPYWITHIN). And besides, that section had more to do with the track itself instead the album. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 21:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TheGoodPerry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Night. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
I was wondering if its correct to put his name with a "S" instead of a "$", its a bit confusing. From what ive seen in other articles for example : " The Buffet" or " Khalifa" his name is used in the stylized form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32zel ( talk • contribs) 05:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Kodak Black.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
00:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want this article to be moved to All-Amerikkkan Badass, requested at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests to have the article moved. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 19:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
For being collaborative and providing quality info in hip hop articles .
32zel ( talk) 03:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC) |
Do not upload higher resolution versions of non-free files. Our non-free content criteria require the use of low resolution images. Uploading a higher resolution constitutes a copyright violation. ~ Rob13 Talk 03:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't mean to discredit your claims and what not, but here it shows only Atlantic as the distributor for the project, not Dollaz N Dealz/Sniper Gang. Therefore I believe that Atlantic should only be credited as distributor for the album. Thanks. LilNumerator ( talk) 10:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Painting Pictures, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
10:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
At Painting Pictures, you added names for the writers of each song. What was your source? Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 10:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
21:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Kodak Black. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
21:11, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's
policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in
loss of editing privileges. Instagram is not a RS, why re arrange the names?
L3X1
(distant write)
21:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Kodak Black.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
22:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
Thanks for all your work on Kodak Black article and hip hop related. Kakashi123456789 ( talk) 16:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC) |
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Russ (rapper).
Magnolia677 (
talk)
11:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Russ (rapper). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing.
This edit summary was unacceptable and a personal attack.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
15:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
With this edit you reverted my previous edit to Drowning (A Boogie wit da Hoodie song), a new article you created. You left the edit summary "This edit is unacceptable, removing big amounts of info, and you didn't even look at the damn sources."
The unsourced information I removed included:
To support these edits, you cited the following:
I was not able to support the edits listed above from the sources you cited. Could you please identify where in these sources they are supported? Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 18:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Please don't link EarDrummers Entertainment in the track listings because it doesn't have its own article or do these artists. It's just lead to a section of music producers with very little information. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 20:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Grateful (DJ Khaled album), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Neither "Kodak Black" nor "Dieuson Octave" is listed as a writer. The source you cited
here (which is a duplicate of the track listing linked to at the top of the section), states only "Ft. Kodak Black" on tracks 13 and 17. Please stop adding unsourced content. To avoid an edit war with you, I will also start a discussion on the article's talk page.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
09:53, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Ctrl (SZA album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
10:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Travis Scott discography.
Magnolia677 (
talk)
19:44, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Grateful (DJ Khaled album).
Magnolia677 (
talk)
18:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ronhjones
(Talk)
21:01, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Bloomdoom2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
@ Ronhjones:, Magnolia677 reported me yesterday, which was declined. Reporting me for the same thing when it was already declined is unfair, please unblock me. Thank you. Bloomdoom2 ( talk) 21:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As below, you were reported for something else. Regardless, this doesn't address your block. You need to talk about your behaviour, when requesting an unblock. In this case, you would need to show that all of your additions are properly cited. Yamla ( talk) 21:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bloomdoom2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
@ Yamla:, Magnolia677 removed the so-called "unsourced content" ( which was sourced) from Grateful, then proceeded to give me a warning and then immediately report me after, which during that time, I made no edits to that same article and any article, so it is inappropriate to give me a block since I did not add any content back to the article, and I had no time to react to what Magnolia677 did. The warning says that I may be blocked the next time I add "unsourced content", which I did not add anything, yet Magnolia677 still reported me. Given the times before to which Magnolia677 reported me countless times, this editor CLEARLY wants me blocked. Also, to note, whenever this editor is questioned about their actions regarding "unsourced content" which isn't unsourced, they don't respond, see above where the warnings in this section are shown. Thank you. Bloomdoom2 ( talk) 21:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you examine the source in the edit you are referecing, you will see that the information you added was indeed not cited there (the comment by Manny Dio was a repost of an original comment by Belly). It's clear from the fact that you are still making this argument that you do not understand how to use sources on Wikipedia, and this gives me sufficient cause for concern that I have upped the block to an indefinite one. To have the block lifted, you will need to demonstrate (not claim) that you comprehend the process for using sources on Wikipedia, in particular the process for determining whether a source is reliable or not. Yunshui 雲 水 07:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thanks for uploading File:Look at Me! Original Cover - XXXTENTACION.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Bloomdoom2, Can you help? A lot of Snoop Dogg single covers are too small or wide (one example is for From tha Chuuuch to da Palace, but one of many). Also: can you get covers for Life of da Party, Murder Was the Case (song) (remix), New York, New York (Tha Dogg Pound song), 2 of Amerikaz Most Wanted, Wrong Idea, Mission Cleopatra (song), Wiggle (song) and To the Max (song) please? Appreciate if you can.-- Theo Mandela ( talk) 15:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:PRBLMS Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MyMomentTeeGrizzley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LookAtMeRereleaseCover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 05:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Look at Me! Original Cover - XXXTENTACION.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 05:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Look at Me! - XXXTENTACION.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 05:55, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Bloomdoom2, thanks for creating The Never Story!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This album may not be Wikipedia notable. It needs to meet WP:NMUSIC and I don't see any record charting on Billboard.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 00:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ugly God is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugly God (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo ( talk) 18:37, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
here's a goat cuz you helped out with making the page for the goat XXXTENTACION
Verysadeyes (
talk)
20:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:It Takes Two by Mike Will Made It.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)