This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

The article Blair (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on two scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:15, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Bonniface (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on two scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:16, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article George Bushby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a name on three scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:19, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article J. Bushby (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on a single club scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:20, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Broughton (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on two scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:20, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Cooke (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on three minor match scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Copden (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on a single scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Curtis (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on two scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:25, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Dark (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname oa single cricket scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:28, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Daley (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:29, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Godfrey (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on a single cricket scorecard in a club match and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Jones (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on five scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information as well as a very common surname. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:39, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Jackson (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:39, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Laurent (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:51, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article W. Leggatte has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:54, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article J. Lewis (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:54, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article J. Macnamara (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on two scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 17:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Maddon (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 17:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Markham (MCC cricketer, 1791) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on two scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material. In this case it's worse - theres a second guy with the same surname who we also have no biographical information about and who only played in one minor match in 1826. So we don't even now which is which.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:00, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Need (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Newland (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article C. Onslow (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Short (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article L. Taylor (Kent cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on two scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Wareford (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:26, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article Warren (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on two scorecards and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

The article J. Cockerill (MCC cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play first-class cricket so fails WP:CRIN. Beyond that we have a surname on one scorecard and absolutely no other biographical information. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that we will ever have enough information about the chap to show notability or to men build a verifiable biography. Fails WP:GNG by absolutely miles and there is no chance that he will ever pass it. This is not even close to redirect with possibilities material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Template:Cricketyearcat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann ( ^{Talk to me}/ _{What I been doing}) 20:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hillingston (English cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillingston (English cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Schazjmd ( talk) 21:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Kenyan cricket team in Sri Lanka in 2001–02 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ericwg ( talk) 15:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:Dutch club cricket teams, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. gidonb ( talk) 02:45, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darby (Cambridgeshire cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darby (Cambridgeshire cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harrias ^talk 08:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article H. F. and A. P. Squire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. F. and A. P. Squire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harrias ^talk 09:40, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

The article H. T. Waghorn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable and completely unreferenced biography which fails WP:AUTHOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Harrias ^talk 09:43, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Hey it’s been a second. In my opinion this project misses you & your great input and dedication. Cheers Celestina007 ( talk) 12:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Mills (Kent cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Mills (Kent cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article T. Leycester (MCC cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Leycester (MCC cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harrias ^talk 10:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article King's Meadow, Nottingham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's Meadow, Nottingham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jellyman ( talk) 17:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

The article Matthew Todd (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

The article Rochester Punch Club cricket team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm really not convinced this is notable - seems like there are going to be very few sources and it's part of the campaign to redefine first-class cricket waged by one author.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 11:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

The article Robert Lascoe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Totally non-notable cricketer who fails WP:GNG and WP:NCRIC. He is known to have played cricket. The first reference (Ashley-Cooper) refers to him once on p.84 ( you can review this here - it requires flash and is odd - searching fo Lasco (no e) will help) as "Lasco, of Bromley in Kent". That, literally, is all it says. His name also appears on a single scorecard from a single match in 1745 on page 36. This match is not considered first-class cricket so he fails WP:NCRIC spectacularly. This seems to have been part of an attempt by an editor (the self-publisher of the second source) and his sock-puppets to list every possible cricketer they can find in any source from the mid 18th century. There is no notability at all that comes anywhere close to meeting the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 15:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Requests for cricket peer review requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Old requests for cricket peer review requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Kenyan cricket tours of England requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1978 in Bangladeshi cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1978 in Sri Lankan cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Postage stamps of the Republic of Ireland has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ww2censor ( talk) 15:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

The article John Colchin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Totally non-notable cricketer who fails WP:GNG and WP:NCRIC. He is known to have played cricket. The source (Ashley-Cooper) refers to him as John Calchin on p.83, but there is no indication whatsoever within it that he has a brother. The fact about being transported is verified, but thousands of men were transported and that doesn't make them notable of itself. His name then appears in two lists of players: one on p.53 and one on p.67 - neither add anything to what we know (you can review the source here - it requires flash and is odd - searching for Calchin will help) He is not mentioned at all as playing in a single-wicket match in 1748, despite the article telling us he did (p.52). None of the matches he played in are considered first-class cricket so he fails WP:NCRIC spectacularly. This seems to have been part of an attempt by an editor to list every possible cricketer they could find in any source from the mid 18th century. Given that only one source has ever been presented to support the article, I have no idea why his name is spelled differently. CricketArchive (which does have an entry on Robin Colchin) has no entry for a John Colchin or any for a Calchin. There is no notability at all that comes anywhere close to meeting the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:57, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

The article Jacob Mann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Totally non-notable cricketer who fails WP:GNG and WP:NCRIC. He is known to have played cricket. The source (Ashley-Cooper) refers to him once as Jacob Man on p.36 in a list of players from a team. That's it (you can review the source here - it requires flash and is odd). He's not mentioned at all in the short pen portraits Ashley-Cooper provides of other players (p.83 on) and the match he played in is not considered first-class cricket so he fails WP:NCRIC spectacularly. Him being active since the 1730s is obviously pure speculation. This seems to have been part of an attempt by an editor to list every possible cricketer they could find in any source from the mid 18th century. CricketArchive has no entry for either Jacob Mann or Jacob Man that could conceivably be this chap - there's a 2018 Derbyshire league division five cricketer, but that's clearly not the same chap). There is no notability at all that comes anywhere close to meeting the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 21:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacob Mann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Mann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Colchin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Colchin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

HawkAussie ( talk) 02:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Latvia in international cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Störm (talk) 14:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Störm (talk) 14:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Störm (talk) 14:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Störm (talk) 14:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Lithuania in international cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Slovakia in international cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Cricket in Latvia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Cricket in Lithuania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Cricket in Slovakia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect John Smith (1845 Yorkshire cricketer). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 4#John Smith (1845 Yorkshire cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ashurst (1802 cricketer). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 5#Ashurst (1802 cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Blue Square Thing ( talk) 21:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1726 in English cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1763 in English cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1726 in cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1726 in English sport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1763 in cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Störm (talk) 06:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Störm (talk) 10:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1771 in English cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1771 in cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1763 in sports requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:00, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1772 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1811 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1812 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1813 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1814 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1815 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1772 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1811 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1812 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1813 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1814 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1815 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1863 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1728 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1728 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1816 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:11, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1816 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1817 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1818 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1819 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)