![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | → | Archive 55 |
Thanks for your suggestion. I've made my case on the talk page. ( Wikipedia_talk:Hatnote#Trivial_hatnote_links) Please join if you feel inclined. Regards, - Stevertigo ( t | c) 07:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Bkonrad I can understand some changes to the pomeroy disambiguation page but, put back the historic pages, those are not so called, "unambiguous partial title matches" because they are important Pomeroy related pages especially the Berry Pomeroy Castle owned and built by the Pomeroy family. also your whole being wise thing really stuck up, don't you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamespomeroy767 ( talk • contribs) 21:46, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Every time I contribute to the Big Three page, you keep deleting it, I just want to know why? ~~Dansham~~
...as is Dallas (Alien), but when I saw Film, and a character, I added, although I'd looked for a Book/Novel section, I overlooked see Dallas (name) further down. Would you agree that Film should be changed to Films, and the other named character removed as well? Dru of Id ( talk) 03:46, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
I messed up and thought you had blanked the page. Sorry Ankh. Morpork 21:20, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
I restored the
template:Geographical locators in
Southern as I think it's a new and visual way of showing the coordinates, and of course relevant to the topic. The template is also added to all the other pages. I acknoledge it's too visible, but I couldn't manage to make the table collapsible. If you can get that, I would appreciate. Thanks,
Sobreira
(parlez)
15:43, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Your reverts of my good-faith edits are discussed. -- George Ho ( talk) 01:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello Bkonrad, I am writing this to address the edit of the Breckenridge, MI page. I do agree with the edit to the census and population, but the nickname is more of a local thing. I live there myself and almost everyone just calls it Breckentucky. There really isn't a source to the name, it was just started by some kids years ago and spread. Thank you for taking the time to fix the page, though. Legion158 ( talk) 22:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legion158 ( talk • contribs) 22:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
Awarded for the very long but ultimately fruitful discussion culminating at Wikipedia talk:Hatnote#New proposal. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 13:18, 17 May 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for sorting out the Talk and History for Sparrowhawk. You may also want to look at Siskin and Goshawk, as I recently did the same thing to them. Nick Number ( talk) 19:36, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Only just noticed your removal of "big black cock". Congratulations and thanks for doing that, i didn't want to be the one explaining the removal of that. You just made my day! Thanks Jenova 20 16:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Bkonrad, I don't get your changes to
Cher (disambiguation). Quoting from
WP:PTM: "Add a link only if the article's subject [...] could plausibly be referred to by essentially the same name as the disambiguated term in a sufficiently generic context". I'm not sure how many readers might refer to
Cher Wang simply as 'Cher': I doubt they will be enough to grant inclusion of that link in the dab page. Also, if you think that
Cher Wang should be included, why did you delete
Cher Lloyd? Finally, a "disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title": if a subject has no own article, like the character Cher in
Clueless (film), then it has no place on a dab page.
If you are applying guidelines that might override PTM, then please clarify, otherwise those extra entries will have to go. --
Giuliopp (
talk)
11:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
older ≠ wiser, would you be so kind as to contribute your thoughts here? — Ben Kovitz ( talk) 00:57, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for the understanding :-) BigSteve ( talk) 08:59, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.
``` Buster Seven Talk 06:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
I think you misused Rollback on your last edit to Gooch. The edit made by the IP was not vandalism as they explained why they were removing the entry and probably felt they were improving the encyclopedia. Please consider discussing the entry. Thanks. GB fan 15:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Would you please comment on the talk page? Maybe it would help if I understood why you like the version without the reference better than the version with. — Ben Kovitz ( talk) 08:29, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia_talk:Hatnote#Finalizing_the_new_proposal. Since you participated in the earlier discussion about trivial hatnotes and what to do about them, your input is requested on a finalizing a proposal.
KarlB (
talk)
06:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Since you recently amended an edit I made in the article, you might be interested in the discussion I initiate in its Talk Page. Cheers. - The Gnome ( talk) 00:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Bkonrad.
Back in May 9th I added many meanings to the QAP page. You then removed them because most were not associated to a Wikipedia page (red links).
I understand it would be great to have pages explaining every one of those meanings, but even if they do not exist yet, QAP is still used all over to represent the terms I added.
Is there a Wikipedia guideline to support your changes? Do you really think those meanings do not contribute to the understanding of QAP?
Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afrachel ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | → | Archive 55 |
Thanks for your suggestion. I've made my case on the talk page. ( Wikipedia_talk:Hatnote#Trivial_hatnote_links) Please join if you feel inclined. Regards, - Stevertigo ( t | c) 07:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Bkonrad I can understand some changes to the pomeroy disambiguation page but, put back the historic pages, those are not so called, "unambiguous partial title matches" because they are important Pomeroy related pages especially the Berry Pomeroy Castle owned and built by the Pomeroy family. also your whole being wise thing really stuck up, don't you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamespomeroy767 ( talk • contribs) 21:46, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Every time I contribute to the Big Three page, you keep deleting it, I just want to know why? ~~Dansham~~
...as is Dallas (Alien), but when I saw Film, and a character, I added, although I'd looked for a Book/Novel section, I overlooked see Dallas (name) further down. Would you agree that Film should be changed to Films, and the other named character removed as well? Dru of Id ( talk) 03:46, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
I messed up and thought you had blanked the page. Sorry Ankh. Morpork 21:20, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
I restored the
template:Geographical locators in
Southern as I think it's a new and visual way of showing the coordinates, and of course relevant to the topic. The template is also added to all the other pages. I acknoledge it's too visible, but I couldn't manage to make the table collapsible. If you can get that, I would appreciate. Thanks,
Sobreira
(parlez)
15:43, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Your reverts of my good-faith edits are discussed. -- George Ho ( talk) 01:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello Bkonrad, I am writing this to address the edit of the Breckenridge, MI page. I do agree with the edit to the census and population, but the nickname is more of a local thing. I live there myself and almost everyone just calls it Breckentucky. There really isn't a source to the name, it was just started by some kids years ago and spread. Thank you for taking the time to fix the page, though. Legion158 ( talk) 22:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legion158 ( talk • contribs) 22:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
Awarded for the very long but ultimately fruitful discussion culminating at Wikipedia talk:Hatnote#New proposal. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 13:18, 17 May 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for sorting out the Talk and History for Sparrowhawk. You may also want to look at Siskin and Goshawk, as I recently did the same thing to them. Nick Number ( talk) 19:36, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Only just noticed your removal of "big black cock". Congratulations and thanks for doing that, i didn't want to be the one explaining the removal of that. You just made my day! Thanks Jenova 20 16:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Bkonrad, I don't get your changes to
Cher (disambiguation). Quoting from
WP:PTM: "Add a link only if the article's subject [...] could plausibly be referred to by essentially the same name as the disambiguated term in a sufficiently generic context". I'm not sure how many readers might refer to
Cher Wang simply as 'Cher': I doubt they will be enough to grant inclusion of that link in the dab page. Also, if you think that
Cher Wang should be included, why did you delete
Cher Lloyd? Finally, a "disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title": if a subject has no own article, like the character Cher in
Clueless (film), then it has no place on a dab page.
If you are applying guidelines that might override PTM, then please clarify, otherwise those extra entries will have to go. --
Giuliopp (
talk)
11:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
older ≠ wiser, would you be so kind as to contribute your thoughts here? — Ben Kovitz ( talk) 00:57, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for the understanding :-) BigSteve ( talk) 08:59, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.
``` Buster Seven Talk 06:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
I think you misused Rollback on your last edit to Gooch. The edit made by the IP was not vandalism as they explained why they were removing the entry and probably felt they were improving the encyclopedia. Please consider discussing the entry. Thanks. GB fan 15:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Would you please comment on the talk page? Maybe it would help if I understood why you like the version without the reference better than the version with. — Ben Kovitz ( talk) 08:29, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia_talk:Hatnote#Finalizing_the_new_proposal. Since you participated in the earlier discussion about trivial hatnotes and what to do about them, your input is requested on a finalizing a proposal.
KarlB (
talk)
06:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Since you recently amended an edit I made in the article, you might be interested in the discussion I initiate in its Talk Page. Cheers. - The Gnome ( talk) 00:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Bkonrad.
Back in May 9th I added many meanings to the QAP page. You then removed them because most were not associated to a Wikipedia page (red links).
I understand it would be great to have pages explaining every one of those meanings, but even if they do not exist yet, QAP is still used all over to represent the terms I added.
Is there a Wikipedia guideline to support your changes? Do you really think those meanings do not contribute to the understanding of QAP?
Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afrachel ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)