![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
About your deleting of the nomination: can you please quote a rule that supports what you've just said, namely "it's been standard practice for years...". If unable to produce such a rule, please undo deletion without delay. Thanks. Sevvyan ( talk) 15:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the heads up. It has been obvious the article has needed work for some time, I just haven't had the time or inclination recently. I'll try to get round to it at a later point, but it won't be before the FAR ends. Best. SteveO ( talk) 12:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
At Iridescent's request I have deferred this article's scheduled TFA appearance on 19 March until September, and replaced it with Brill railway station. Could I ask you, please, to remove the protection from the former? Thanks. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
PoD has directly called me a liar, a fool and stupid on that particular page. These are not merely unhelpful remarks, but are personal attacks. I suggest that you take PoD to task for his rampant incivility before even considering intervening on his behalf. Urselius ( talk) 20:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Please address my initial point. WIki-legalism is neither here nor there, when I write on a user's talkpage I expect to be addressing that user. Urselius ( talk) 21:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited C.M. Pitman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rochester. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Bencherlite, you blocked the above editor as a vandal a little over a year ago. They've written to UTRS ( UTRS appeal #13263) claiming they've seen the error of their ways. Do you have any objection to an unblock per WP:ROPE? Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your revert, having a little ms-understanding with an editor, if you could check Earth my same kind of edit has been reverted and I don't want to get anywhere near wp:3rr :P. Thanx, Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, can you please tell me how will I change the article which appears in the portal in the Selected Article section? RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি ( talk) 12:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Can't help feeling it's a bit lame, but never mind. Just think of all the outrage we could have had if someone had nominated Fanny Bullock Workman to be that date instead of a few days later. -- Dweller ( talk) 17:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
I've been looking at the discussions on the FAC talkpage concerning main page date notification on the chosen article's talkpage. I'm not quite clear whether the system has changed in this respect from the instructions you provided at the start of the year, and I'd like to know, if possible, before I resume scheduling in a week or so's time. Brianboulton ( talk) 09:11, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Why don't more editors strive for FA? I may be reaching, but I also strongly believe at least 2 accredited FA collaborations should be among the standard criteria for RfA. Thank you for all you do!! Atsme☯ Consult 00:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know that I am still following up your request about this source, amongst the many other things that I'm working on here, and I hope I can dig out the article next week. I doubt I can make the article public, but I can share it with you. Are you happy to share an email address with me, or a similar way to get a copy to you? My email is martin.poulterbodleian.ox.ac.uk .
MartinPoulter (
talk)
15:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
How did you do this? I'm trying to get the current 2008 list to add to my page. Thanks. -- Dweller ( talk) 13:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
"HTH"? -- Dweller ( talk) 08:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Would you mind looking at the "currently accepting" dates on this page which appear to be a day out, as I have scheduled up to and including May 14. I must have made an error on one of the recent schedulings – can you put it right? Brianboulton ( talk) 23:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Running Man Barnstar | |
Hey old Dark Blue fiend, just a quick barnstar to say thanks for the review of one of Boat Race articles you conducted over the past year. As of this morning, I completed my (initial) goal of ensuing that every Boat Race had, not only its own article, but one that was either of GA or FA status: we now have 158 GAs and 3 FAs that we can all be proud of! It doesn't stop here, for me at least, I'm going to keep up with improving the quality of the GAs and look for more FA opportunities. Plus, there's the small matter of 70 Women's Boat Race articles to get up and running! But thanks again, I couldn't have done it without your help. The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC) |
The Rambling Man, you deserve the barnstar not me, mate. Congratulations on a towering body of work. Bencherlite Talk 08:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Both Osias Tager and Romie Tager (barrister) came to my attention when they were linked by their creator ( Philafrenzy) to the bio I created for an autism researcher at Helen Tager-Flusberg. I was hoping you could glance at them to see if there is undue emphasis on the business of the father's will. Best, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:55, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
I have swopped the articles scheduled for 1 and 13 May, so that 1 May is now The Tower House and 13 May is Blackrock (film). The protection arrangements may need sorting out – could you do this? Thanks. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
If you are around to answer this (it's not urgent), I have been putting together a list of the Professors of Experimental Philosophy at Oxford University (see draft here). There is the already existing Category:Dr Lee's Professors of Experimental Philosophy, and I noticed that John Alexander Smith had been placed in it by this edit you made. I just removed it, as I don't think he ever held that chair. Carcharoth ( talk) 23:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Heh. I just clicked on 'what links here' for various professorships, and you might be interested to know that it picked up the 'ifexist' conditionals that you put here and here and here. Though now I have to try and work out whether the redlink for Dr Lee's Professor of Physical Chemistry should have 'Physical' in there or not... (it looks like the sources use the terms interchangeably, though the distinction might have emerged at some point as physical chemistry became a distinct discipline?). Dr Lee's Professor of Chemistry is the alternative (and maybe formal) title, I think. Carcharoth ( talk) 07:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I'd be pleased if you'd handle this. Brianboulton ( talk) 23:27, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Wikilove from the Bodleian |
Just wanted to say thanks from us here at the Bodleian Libraries for all the work you've done to improve (and create!) pages related to our history. We really appreciate it! Liz McCarthy ( talk) 15:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC) |
... on TFA prose, any time. Haven't heard from you in a while; just making sure you know. I hear there's life outside Wikipedia, and hope you're enjoying it. - Dank ( push to talk) 18:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
L Faraone 21:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion on the deprecation of Template:English variant notice. Since you've had some involvement with the English variant notice template, you might want to participate in the discussion if you have not already done so.— Godsy( TALK CONT) 07:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
I was there today, on the right side of the dock, of course! I was aghast to find no article on such a magnificent building, [ so I started one and is very much a work in progress. I used your picture too, so I thank you for that :) Cassianto Talk 17:15, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
@ Cassianto: Was Chillum the Judge presiding the case ;-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Cassianto - it is indeed a building with an interesting history! I can't claim any credit for the photograph, since I was merely the uploader of a Geograph photo. Nice article.
Bencherlite
Talk
13:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Just a word of thanks for nominating that article for In The News...Dr Scott was a dear friend. JackTheVicar ( talk) 20:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
I recently ran across the wiki for Sir Edward Stafford, /info/en/?search=Edward_Stafford_%28diplomat%29. Do you know of any images of Sir Edward?
We have a portrait in our museum collection that may be of Sir Edward. The evidence is slim so far (happy to share if you are interested). Another image of Sir Edward would certainly inform our research.
Thanks
Perry Hurt Associate Conservator North Carolina Museum of Art — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perry Hurt ( talk • contribs) 17:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
"I notice you've created one further subcategory since this nomination started", I assume it's a mistake of eyesight. Can you recheck? Solomon 7968 17:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The links to listed buildings in the Cadw website seem to have become dead. This has certainly happened to "my" articles on Welsh listed buildings, and it seems to have happened at least to "your" Anglesey churches. I have tried to use the Cadw website, but find it difficult to search (= impossible for me). Have you any idea where and how we can find the live links? Cheers, -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 18:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Bencherlite. I'm just posting to let you know that List of mathematicians, physicians, and scientists educated at Jesus College, Oxford – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 17:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
You asked me a question whether "being an invited speaker at the ICM conference is the second-highest honour a mathematician can be given" in the ICM category deletion "debate". I failed to answer it but Suslin just added some text to the list which answers it in a round about way. And, oh, it is published in a somewhat reliable source... Solomon 7968 12:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Misspelled as "Hume". --
George Ho (
talk)
10:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
You are from the United Kingdom, and you decided to post his name in the RD. I requested pulling his name out in ITN, and I would like to do it again here. If you pull the UK guy out, can you reinsert the Hungarian president? --
George Ho (
talk)
05:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the assumption that I made the decision because of my nationality - that's a really magnificent assumption of good faith there. And thanks for the lesson that assessing consensus is simply head-counting rather than weighing arguments. And to think I've spent all these years as an admin doing it wrong! I see that the referencing has been improved (and I also note that nobody raised any concerns about the quality of the article before posting - actually one person did, then struck it and moved to support) so I think we're done here. Perhaps the time has come to do away with the RD line because it provokes so much unnecessary argument about one link on the main page that is there for just a few days. Bencherlite Talk 09:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks! Hopefully not too many egregious errors or horrible faux pas in my more trenchant work. I was at least able to properly reference an article by our mutual friend in the main CH article — Preceding unsigned comment added by YnadCoch ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | |
Shout for joy |
---|
Giving music you may remember, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:34, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:High school dropouts. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. p b p 23:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I was interrupted while creating Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ThunderJaemin, and did not have the sandbox listed as a link in nomination at the time of your !vote. I have since added the sandbox. I don't believe that should affect your reasoning and position, but I think it best to let you know so you can review. Thanks. -- Whpq ( talk) 12:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
About your deleting of the nomination: can you please quote a rule that supports what you've just said, namely "it's been standard practice for years...". If unable to produce such a rule, please undo deletion without delay. Thanks. Sevvyan ( talk) 15:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the heads up. It has been obvious the article has needed work for some time, I just haven't had the time or inclination recently. I'll try to get round to it at a later point, but it won't be before the FAR ends. Best. SteveO ( talk) 12:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
At Iridescent's request I have deferred this article's scheduled TFA appearance on 19 March until September, and replaced it with Brill railway station. Could I ask you, please, to remove the protection from the former? Thanks. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
PoD has directly called me a liar, a fool and stupid on that particular page. These are not merely unhelpful remarks, but are personal attacks. I suggest that you take PoD to task for his rampant incivility before even considering intervening on his behalf. Urselius ( talk) 20:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Please address my initial point. WIki-legalism is neither here nor there, when I write on a user's talkpage I expect to be addressing that user. Urselius ( talk) 21:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited C.M. Pitman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rochester. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Bencherlite, you blocked the above editor as a vandal a little over a year ago. They've written to UTRS ( UTRS appeal #13263) claiming they've seen the error of their ways. Do you have any objection to an unblock per WP:ROPE? Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your revert, having a little ms-understanding with an editor, if you could check Earth my same kind of edit has been reverted and I don't want to get anywhere near wp:3rr :P. Thanx, Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, can you please tell me how will I change the article which appears in the portal in the Selected Article section? RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি ( talk) 12:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Can't help feeling it's a bit lame, but never mind. Just think of all the outrage we could have had if someone had nominated Fanny Bullock Workman to be that date instead of a few days later. -- Dweller ( talk) 17:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
I've been looking at the discussions on the FAC talkpage concerning main page date notification on the chosen article's talkpage. I'm not quite clear whether the system has changed in this respect from the instructions you provided at the start of the year, and I'd like to know, if possible, before I resume scheduling in a week or so's time. Brianboulton ( talk) 09:11, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Why don't more editors strive for FA? I may be reaching, but I also strongly believe at least 2 accredited FA collaborations should be among the standard criteria for RfA. Thank you for all you do!! Atsme☯ Consult 00:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know that I am still following up your request about this source, amongst the many other things that I'm working on here, and I hope I can dig out the article next week. I doubt I can make the article public, but I can share it with you. Are you happy to share an email address with me, or a similar way to get a copy to you? My email is martin.poulterbodleian.ox.ac.uk .
MartinPoulter (
talk)
15:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
How did you do this? I'm trying to get the current 2008 list to add to my page. Thanks. -- Dweller ( talk) 13:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
"HTH"? -- Dweller ( talk) 08:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Would you mind looking at the "currently accepting" dates on this page which appear to be a day out, as I have scheduled up to and including May 14. I must have made an error on one of the recent schedulings – can you put it right? Brianboulton ( talk) 23:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Running Man Barnstar | |
Hey old Dark Blue fiend, just a quick barnstar to say thanks for the review of one of Boat Race articles you conducted over the past year. As of this morning, I completed my (initial) goal of ensuing that every Boat Race had, not only its own article, but one that was either of GA or FA status: we now have 158 GAs and 3 FAs that we can all be proud of! It doesn't stop here, for me at least, I'm going to keep up with improving the quality of the GAs and look for more FA opportunities. Plus, there's the small matter of 70 Women's Boat Race articles to get up and running! But thanks again, I couldn't have done it without your help. The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC) |
The Rambling Man, you deserve the barnstar not me, mate. Congratulations on a towering body of work. Bencherlite Talk 08:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Both Osias Tager and Romie Tager (barrister) came to my attention when they were linked by their creator ( Philafrenzy) to the bio I created for an autism researcher at Helen Tager-Flusberg. I was hoping you could glance at them to see if there is undue emphasis on the business of the father's will. Best, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:55, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
I have swopped the articles scheduled for 1 and 13 May, so that 1 May is now The Tower House and 13 May is Blackrock (film). The protection arrangements may need sorting out – could you do this? Thanks. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
If you are around to answer this (it's not urgent), I have been putting together a list of the Professors of Experimental Philosophy at Oxford University (see draft here). There is the already existing Category:Dr Lee's Professors of Experimental Philosophy, and I noticed that John Alexander Smith had been placed in it by this edit you made. I just removed it, as I don't think he ever held that chair. Carcharoth ( talk) 23:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Heh. I just clicked on 'what links here' for various professorships, and you might be interested to know that it picked up the 'ifexist' conditionals that you put here and here and here. Though now I have to try and work out whether the redlink for Dr Lee's Professor of Physical Chemistry should have 'Physical' in there or not... (it looks like the sources use the terms interchangeably, though the distinction might have emerged at some point as physical chemistry became a distinct discipline?). Dr Lee's Professor of Chemistry is the alternative (and maybe formal) title, I think. Carcharoth ( talk) 07:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I'd be pleased if you'd handle this. Brianboulton ( talk) 23:27, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Wikilove from the Bodleian |
Just wanted to say thanks from us here at the Bodleian Libraries for all the work you've done to improve (and create!) pages related to our history. We really appreciate it! Liz McCarthy ( talk) 15:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC) |
... on TFA prose, any time. Haven't heard from you in a while; just making sure you know. I hear there's life outside Wikipedia, and hope you're enjoying it. - Dank ( push to talk) 18:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
L Faraone 21:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion on the deprecation of Template:English variant notice. Since you've had some involvement with the English variant notice template, you might want to participate in the discussion if you have not already done so.— Godsy( TALK CONT) 07:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
I was there today, on the right side of the dock, of course! I was aghast to find no article on such a magnificent building, [ so I started one and is very much a work in progress. I used your picture too, so I thank you for that :) Cassianto Talk 17:15, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
@ Cassianto: Was Chillum the Judge presiding the case ;-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Cassianto - it is indeed a building with an interesting history! I can't claim any credit for the photograph, since I was merely the uploader of a Geograph photo. Nice article.
Bencherlite
Talk
13:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Just a word of thanks for nominating that article for In The News...Dr Scott was a dear friend. JackTheVicar ( talk) 20:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
I recently ran across the wiki for Sir Edward Stafford, /info/en/?search=Edward_Stafford_%28diplomat%29. Do you know of any images of Sir Edward?
We have a portrait in our museum collection that may be of Sir Edward. The evidence is slim so far (happy to share if you are interested). Another image of Sir Edward would certainly inform our research.
Thanks
Perry Hurt Associate Conservator North Carolina Museum of Art — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perry Hurt ( talk • contribs) 17:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
"I notice you've created one further subcategory since this nomination started", I assume it's a mistake of eyesight. Can you recheck? Solomon 7968 17:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The links to listed buildings in the Cadw website seem to have become dead. This has certainly happened to "my" articles on Welsh listed buildings, and it seems to have happened at least to "your" Anglesey churches. I have tried to use the Cadw website, but find it difficult to search (= impossible for me). Have you any idea where and how we can find the live links? Cheers, -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 18:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Bencherlite. I'm just posting to let you know that List of mathematicians, physicians, and scientists educated at Jesus College, Oxford – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 17:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
You asked me a question whether "being an invited speaker at the ICM conference is the second-highest honour a mathematician can be given" in the ICM category deletion "debate". I failed to answer it but Suslin just added some text to the list which answers it in a round about way. And, oh, it is published in a somewhat reliable source... Solomon 7968 12:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Misspelled as "Hume". --
George Ho (
talk)
10:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
You are from the United Kingdom, and you decided to post his name in the RD. I requested pulling his name out in ITN, and I would like to do it again here. If you pull the UK guy out, can you reinsert the Hungarian president? --
George Ho (
talk)
05:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the assumption that I made the decision because of my nationality - that's a really magnificent assumption of good faith there. And thanks for the lesson that assessing consensus is simply head-counting rather than weighing arguments. And to think I've spent all these years as an admin doing it wrong! I see that the referencing has been improved (and I also note that nobody raised any concerns about the quality of the article before posting - actually one person did, then struck it and moved to support) so I think we're done here. Perhaps the time has come to do away with the RD line because it provokes so much unnecessary argument about one link on the main page that is there for just a few days. Bencherlite Talk 09:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks! Hopefully not too many egregious errors or horrible faux pas in my more trenchant work. I was at least able to properly reference an article by our mutual friend in the main CH article — Preceding unsigned comment added by YnadCoch ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | |
Shout for joy |
---|
Giving music you may remember, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:34, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:High school dropouts. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. p b p 23:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I was interrupted while creating Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ThunderJaemin, and did not have the sandbox listed as a link in nomination at the time of your !vote. I have since added the sandbox. I don't believe that should affect your reasoning and position, but I think it best to let you know so you can review. Thanks. -- Whpq ( talk) 12:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)