![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
Archive 15
I'll reply this afternoon my time (Australian time). I really, really must discipline myself to do the non-Wiki world stuff first :) PiCo ( talk) 00:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.
We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.
If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.
Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)
You previously voiced an opinion on an AfD discussion on an article. It was subsequently moved to user space and made it to main space. It has been nominated for deletion again: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantata++ (3rd nomination). If you are interested in weighing-in, it would be helpful to know if you see any improvement in the article and it currently meets WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
I was already in the volunteer list. Thank you for telling me the obscure way to accept the case. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:28, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Could you please check the content in the article Pashtun tribes which I am trying to wikify and make encyclopedic. Thank you. 182.185.78.0 ( talk) 07:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
I had left a couple of questions, one for you, and one for the person who first looked in on this dispute, could you please answer them so I can go forward here? I'm a little unclear what sort of interplay is allowed here. Anmccaff ( talk) 01:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Dear Bejnar,
The User Acidsnow left a note on our talk page. He did not present his summary on the noticeboard. May I ask why the thread have not opened yet despite the request being filed over 2 days ago? 92.96.160.44 ( talk) 14:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Bejnar,
A few days ago, you volunteered to moderate the General Motors streetcar conspiracy DRN case. However, I see that you haven't been online for a couple of days, which means that the discussion cannot continue without a moderator. Could you please clarify if you're too busy to handle this case, so that someone else can take it? Thanks, -- Biblio worm 21:57, 3 February 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)
I just removed a sentence where someone was called conspiracy theorist which was in whole not covered by a source. Discrediting people that way should not receive space here. You recently said "Do not use "conspiracy theory" or variants in the article unless parties agree to each specific use." I noticed on several places the term is used when ideologies hit one another (policy cannot get ideology out of head) and the editor does not agree with with person and his work. The use of the term should be restricted anywhere it pops up. Spearmind ( talk) 11:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
As you will see I have objected strongly on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard to continued comments about other contributors (including myself) by one participant, both in the body text and now also in the comment field. I have left a separate note on his talk page relating to a habit of snipping up another participant's contribution, leaving them unintelligible requesting that he repairs it. Personally I am stepping back from the main discussion because I think this it is best for others to lead now, but I do object to my name being continually mentioned in this way. Can you do what you can to discourage this? Many thanks, and many thanks also for volunteering for this difficult task. PeterEastern ( talk) 21:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Bejnar, capitalismojo wants to revert my deletes of massive use of the negative term. We discussed the term should not be used until covered by source. The massive use or term conspiracy theorist and lack of sources is no justified. Spearmind ( talk) 23:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Van Tuyl. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. TL22 ( talk) 21:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Umreth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anand. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
There is a discussion at the administrators' noticeboard for intervention regarding Strivingsoul. - Kudzu1 ( talk) 16:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
No, I don't object to the MoS guidance. But you unlinked only some (not all) section headings at List of heads of state of Poland, and if we start to unlink it should be a complete work, not a partial one. Also, section headings should be unlinked at List of Prime Ministers of Poland too, for the sake of consistency. -- Sundostund ( talk) 21:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm writing to you in regards to the case you helped close, /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_106#Talk:Mounir_Majidi. Tachfin is back to his old ways of repeatedly undoing my edits to the Mounir Majidi page, /info/en/?search=Mounir_Majidi, with no real explanation why. The discussion was ended due to his lack of cooperation and utter silence on the matter, even though he was the one who opened the board in the first place. I was professional and courteous and supplied a lot of information to back up my points, though Tachfin doesn't seem to be interested in discussion and is absolutely edit-warring with no warrants. His latest "reason" for his latest undo was, "dispute not resolved yet." ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mounir_Majidi&action=history) But even when there's clearly a dispute, he ignores it.
Thanks for your time and thoughts, Chewbakadog ( talk) 05:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Nikkimaria ( talk) 02:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I tried.... and considering its notable cast, I do not doubt it was covered in media, but the darn thing is flummoxed by its era and that fact that Google does not archive Philippine media from that year. I went ahead and redirected to its director. Schmidt, Michael Q. 06:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Bejnar, are you still interested in access to Keesing's? Nikkimaria ( talk) 13:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palena River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Please discuss your concerns at Talk:Jenny (donkey), not my talk page. That way, any other editors concerned about the article can weigh in. Montanabw (talk) 17:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
I ask you to assist in a dispute. You are listed as a helper. Others that I checked are not active anymore but you are.
Versus was edit warring and was blocked twice for that. He is blocked for a few more hours. As soon as he was blocked, new people appeared to argue his way, people that weren't around before.
Let's get the to fact, though.
2015 Thalys train attack There is a passenger list. It has changed many times. Sometimes it is about the people who subdued the gunman. Other times it was the injured passengers. Still other times, the involved passengers. The list, no matter how it is phrased is quite short.
There is an effort to hide the name of one passenger, Anglade, who is very well cited in many reports. All news reports mention Stone. Many mention Skarlatos. The third most cited is Anglade. Granted, he did not shoot the attacker but is mentioned many times in many sources and was injured. Incidentally, sources also mention that Anglade starred in the French film (was the lead actor) "The Wounded Man". Some editors do not want this even though this was one of the actors most cited work (probably his 3rd most famous film).
Wikipedia should not hide stuff.
I am mindful of consensus but there is no consensus here. Some editors are busy and have chimed in only once or twice (in my favor), such as Green Cardamom and Tough Sailor. However, correctness has a value, not only consensus. There is a consensus in eastern Syria to behead Americans and Europeans but that doesn't make it right. There is also a consensus for the election which elected Hitler and Kim Jong Un. Sandra opposed to terrorism ( talk) 19:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your perspective! Even though you are no longer a DR volunteer, your insight is useful. If I had to summarize (and do a bad job at it), your suggestion was "consider no list". I know that wasn't the exact suggestion but it made me think of that new idea. Sandra opposed to terrorism ( talk) 20:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— Artificial cloud —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb ( talk) 18:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dowreh County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shurab Rural District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Another example, I guess, but what else could the closing admin have done... -- Randykitty ( talk) 07:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
no is not the text that you said. Check about. -- Alec Smithson ( talk) 15:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
|
|
Thank you for your helpful comments in Afd concerning Bruce Eder and the article the Stumblin' Blox. I have taken your advice and enquired about Eder at the notable sources noticeboard. Thanks. Garagepunk66 ( talk) 03:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Wikiclaus greetings | |
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baladiyat of Libya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basic People's Congress. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Science fiction comics may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:24, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello Bejnar! It is nice to see someone is now taking care of sucos of East Timor in English Wikipedia. I was wondering a little, why ou are moving Fatubessi, Hatulia to Fatubessi, Ermera. It does not cause problems in this case, but there are several examples for sucos with the same name inside one municipality (former district), but in different administrative posts (former subdistricts). For example Fatumaquerec in Soibada and Fatumaquerec in Laclubar, both in Manatuto. That is why the difference in the lemma is chosen always by the next administrative position in German, Malaysian and Tetun Wikipedia. Just to think about. I will not change here anything. If you have questions, you can always contact me, on my German Wikipedia discussion page. Greetings, -- J. Patrick Fischer ( talk) 22:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fadi Chehadé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IANA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
Archive 15
I'll reply this afternoon my time (Australian time). I really, really must discipline myself to do the non-Wiki world stuff first :) PiCo ( talk) 00:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.
We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.
If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.
Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)
You previously voiced an opinion on an AfD discussion on an article. It was subsequently moved to user space and made it to main space. It has been nominated for deletion again: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantata++ (3rd nomination). If you are interested in weighing-in, it would be helpful to know if you see any improvement in the article and it currently meets WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
I was already in the volunteer list. Thank you for telling me the obscure way to accept the case. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:28, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Could you please check the content in the article Pashtun tribes which I am trying to wikify and make encyclopedic. Thank you. 182.185.78.0 ( talk) 07:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
I had left a couple of questions, one for you, and one for the person who first looked in on this dispute, could you please answer them so I can go forward here? I'm a little unclear what sort of interplay is allowed here. Anmccaff ( talk) 01:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Dear Bejnar,
The User Acidsnow left a note on our talk page. He did not present his summary on the noticeboard. May I ask why the thread have not opened yet despite the request being filed over 2 days ago? 92.96.160.44 ( talk) 14:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Bejnar,
A few days ago, you volunteered to moderate the General Motors streetcar conspiracy DRN case. However, I see that you haven't been online for a couple of days, which means that the discussion cannot continue without a moderator. Could you please clarify if you're too busy to handle this case, so that someone else can take it? Thanks, -- Biblio worm 21:57, 3 February 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)
I just removed a sentence where someone was called conspiracy theorist which was in whole not covered by a source. Discrediting people that way should not receive space here. You recently said "Do not use "conspiracy theory" or variants in the article unless parties agree to each specific use." I noticed on several places the term is used when ideologies hit one another (policy cannot get ideology out of head) and the editor does not agree with with person and his work. The use of the term should be restricted anywhere it pops up. Spearmind ( talk) 11:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
As you will see I have objected strongly on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard to continued comments about other contributors (including myself) by one participant, both in the body text and now also in the comment field. I have left a separate note on his talk page relating to a habit of snipping up another participant's contribution, leaving them unintelligible requesting that he repairs it. Personally I am stepping back from the main discussion because I think this it is best for others to lead now, but I do object to my name being continually mentioned in this way. Can you do what you can to discourage this? Many thanks, and many thanks also for volunteering for this difficult task. PeterEastern ( talk) 21:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Bejnar, capitalismojo wants to revert my deletes of massive use of the negative term. We discussed the term should not be used until covered by source. The massive use or term conspiracy theorist and lack of sources is no justified. Spearmind ( talk) 23:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Van Tuyl. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. TL22 ( talk) 21:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Umreth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anand. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
There is a discussion at the administrators' noticeboard for intervention regarding Strivingsoul. - Kudzu1 ( talk) 16:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
No, I don't object to the MoS guidance. But you unlinked only some (not all) section headings at List of heads of state of Poland, and if we start to unlink it should be a complete work, not a partial one. Also, section headings should be unlinked at List of Prime Ministers of Poland too, for the sake of consistency. -- Sundostund ( talk) 21:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm writing to you in regards to the case you helped close, /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_106#Talk:Mounir_Majidi. Tachfin is back to his old ways of repeatedly undoing my edits to the Mounir Majidi page, /info/en/?search=Mounir_Majidi, with no real explanation why. The discussion was ended due to his lack of cooperation and utter silence on the matter, even though he was the one who opened the board in the first place. I was professional and courteous and supplied a lot of information to back up my points, though Tachfin doesn't seem to be interested in discussion and is absolutely edit-warring with no warrants. His latest "reason" for his latest undo was, "dispute not resolved yet." ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mounir_Majidi&action=history) But even when there's clearly a dispute, he ignores it.
Thanks for your time and thoughts, Chewbakadog ( talk) 05:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Nikkimaria ( talk) 02:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I tried.... and considering its notable cast, I do not doubt it was covered in media, but the darn thing is flummoxed by its era and that fact that Google does not archive Philippine media from that year. I went ahead and redirected to its director. Schmidt, Michael Q. 06:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Bejnar, are you still interested in access to Keesing's? Nikkimaria ( talk) 13:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palena River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Please discuss your concerns at Talk:Jenny (donkey), not my talk page. That way, any other editors concerned about the article can weigh in. Montanabw (talk) 17:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
I ask you to assist in a dispute. You are listed as a helper. Others that I checked are not active anymore but you are.
Versus was edit warring and was blocked twice for that. He is blocked for a few more hours. As soon as he was blocked, new people appeared to argue his way, people that weren't around before.
Let's get the to fact, though.
2015 Thalys train attack There is a passenger list. It has changed many times. Sometimes it is about the people who subdued the gunman. Other times it was the injured passengers. Still other times, the involved passengers. The list, no matter how it is phrased is quite short.
There is an effort to hide the name of one passenger, Anglade, who is very well cited in many reports. All news reports mention Stone. Many mention Skarlatos. The third most cited is Anglade. Granted, he did not shoot the attacker but is mentioned many times in many sources and was injured. Incidentally, sources also mention that Anglade starred in the French film (was the lead actor) "The Wounded Man". Some editors do not want this even though this was one of the actors most cited work (probably his 3rd most famous film).
Wikipedia should not hide stuff.
I am mindful of consensus but there is no consensus here. Some editors are busy and have chimed in only once or twice (in my favor), such as Green Cardamom and Tough Sailor. However, correctness has a value, not only consensus. There is a consensus in eastern Syria to behead Americans and Europeans but that doesn't make it right. There is also a consensus for the election which elected Hitler and Kim Jong Un. Sandra opposed to terrorism ( talk) 19:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your perspective! Even though you are no longer a DR volunteer, your insight is useful. If I had to summarize (and do a bad job at it), your suggestion was "consider no list". I know that wasn't the exact suggestion but it made me think of that new idea. Sandra opposed to terrorism ( talk) 20:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— Artificial cloud —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb ( talk) 18:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dowreh County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shurab Rural District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Another example, I guess, but what else could the closing admin have done... -- Randykitty ( talk) 07:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
no is not the text that you said. Check about. -- Alec Smithson ( talk) 15:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
|
|
Thank you for your helpful comments in Afd concerning Bruce Eder and the article the Stumblin' Blox. I have taken your advice and enquired about Eder at the notable sources noticeboard. Thanks. Garagepunk66 ( talk) 03:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Wikiclaus greetings | |
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baladiyat of Libya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basic People's Congress. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Science fiction comics may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:24, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello Bejnar! It is nice to see someone is now taking care of sucos of East Timor in English Wikipedia. I was wondering a little, why ou are moving Fatubessi, Hatulia to Fatubessi, Ermera. It does not cause problems in this case, but there are several examples for sucos with the same name inside one municipality (former district), but in different administrative posts (former subdistricts). For example Fatumaquerec in Soibada and Fatumaquerec in Laclubar, both in Manatuto. That is why the difference in the lemma is chosen always by the next administrative position in German, Malaysian and Tetun Wikipedia. Just to think about. I will not change here anything. If you have questions, you can always contact me, on my German Wikipedia discussion page. Greetings, -- J. Patrick Fischer ( talk) 22:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fadi Chehadé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IANA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)