Hi, I'm Airplane Maniac. Awojdyla, thanks for creating Fourier ptychography!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Its a little to technical, and needs some reorganization, but its off to a great start!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. -- AM ( Talk to me!) 00:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Yves Petroff, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Xain36 {
talk}
18:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Awojdyla, Yves Petroff is clearly a notable scientist, as director of several national synchrotron radiation user facilities, and clearly passes the relevant wikipedia notability guidelines for scientists at WP:NPROF. As such I have moved your draft back to mainspace without further delay and done a little bit of cleanup. Best wishes Polyamorph ( talk) 19:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! Awojdyla ( talk) 20:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Awojdyla. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! Polyamorph ( talk) 20:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Awojdyla,
Thank you for creating Hope Ishii.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
References written by independent people are required to show notability. Reviews of the subject's work would count.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 22:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Daniel L. Menichella, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
DGG (
talk )
06:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank for your review. We can add source later, there are dozens published on the topic (because of covid-19.) This page is a translation from the German page and already has more references than the source. Why should we keep it as a draft? (I have limited bandwidth to edit pages.) Awojdyla ( talk) 08:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Daniel L. Menichella, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Sulfurboy (
talk)
07:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Awojdyla!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Sulfurboy (
talk)
07:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
|
An article you recently created,
James B Murphy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Celestina007 (
talk)
05:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elaine DiMasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine DiMasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eostrix ( talk) 08:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on LAAAMP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 ( talk) 17:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Centre for Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
13:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Awojdyla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Daniel L. Menichella".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 ( talk) 10:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Awojdyla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " James B Murphy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Awojdyla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " LAAAMP".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Stefanie Tompkins, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more information and citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) ). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. or let me know on my user talk page for an immmediater eview, because the position is very important and we should have an article
DGG (
talk )
00:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
@ HouseOfChange: Thanks for the upgrades -- I had collected lots of references, but I lost the content before I could save it. This is totally great Awojdyla ( talk) 21:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
On 19 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stefanie Tompkins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stefanie Tompkins. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Stefanie Tompkins), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Galileo Violini, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 20:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Awojdyla,
Thank you for creating Galileo Violini.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please ensure that everything has sources, particularly his awards.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Ldm1954 ( talk) 09:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Awojdyla! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "
Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.
Kj cheetham (
talk)
22:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Airplane Maniac. Awojdyla, thanks for creating Fourier ptychography!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Its a little to technical, and needs some reorganization, but its off to a great start!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. -- AM ( Talk to me!) 00:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Yves Petroff, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Xain36 {
talk}
18:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Awojdyla, Yves Petroff is clearly a notable scientist, as director of several national synchrotron radiation user facilities, and clearly passes the relevant wikipedia notability guidelines for scientists at WP:NPROF. As such I have moved your draft back to mainspace without further delay and done a little bit of cleanup. Best wishes Polyamorph ( talk) 19:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! Awojdyla ( talk) 20:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Awojdyla. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! Polyamorph ( talk) 20:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Awojdyla,
Thank you for creating Hope Ishii.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
References written by independent people are required to show notability. Reviews of the subject's work would count.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 22:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Daniel L. Menichella, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
DGG (
talk )
06:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank for your review. We can add source later, there are dozens published on the topic (because of covid-19.) This page is a translation from the German page and already has more references than the source. Why should we keep it as a draft? (I have limited bandwidth to edit pages.) Awojdyla ( talk) 08:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Daniel L. Menichella, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Sulfurboy (
talk)
07:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Awojdyla!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Sulfurboy (
talk)
07:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
|
An article you recently created,
James B Murphy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Celestina007 (
talk)
05:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elaine DiMasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine DiMasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eostrix ( talk) 08:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on LAAAMP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 ( talk) 17:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Centre for Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
13:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Awojdyla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Daniel L. Menichella".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 ( talk) 10:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Awojdyla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " James B Murphy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Awojdyla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " LAAAMP".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Stefanie Tompkins, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more information and citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) ). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. or let me know on my user talk page for an immmediater eview, because the position is very important and we should have an article
DGG (
talk )
00:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
@ HouseOfChange: Thanks for the upgrades -- I had collected lots of references, but I lost the content before I could save it. This is totally great Awojdyla ( talk) 21:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
On 19 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stefanie Tompkins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stefanie Tompkins. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Stefanie Tompkins), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Galileo Violini, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 20:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Awojdyla,
Thank you for creating Galileo Violini.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please ensure that everything has sources, particularly his awards.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Ldm1954 ( talk) 09:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Awojdyla! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "
Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.
Kj cheetham (
talk)
22:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)