This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 |
These things happened on the show though, so they’ve been confirmed and the bit about Halloween VI involving Cindy should have detailed that without question. Futuremoviewriter ( talk) 18:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Will you accept clips of the specific scenes as citations? Futuremoviewriter ( talk) 19:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Based on their recent edits today and ignoring talk page messages, I'm sensing some WP:CIR issues here. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 23:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I don't understand the last reverse on Tanked. It's the subject of the episode, as indicated on the AnimalPlanet page, and as such, I don't see how it would be seen as a © infrigement... Anyhow, if that's the case, you must also delete all the other short summaries I added, because I all took them from their web page. Or just adding quotes around the summaries would be sufficient ? I'll admit I'm quite lost here, as it would seem that it enters the realm of the fair citation use, it's only a phrase... Dunno. Not a lawyer, not even an english first tonger, so I'll leave the decisions in your hands. -- Arnaud
Ok, good luck with the summaries then. -- Arnaud —Preceding undated comment added 21:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you look like a pretty active admin so I'm wondering if you can take a look at this.
My goal is to change "all edits by them should be reverted on sight..." to "this user has been banned so edits by them may be reverted on sight..." in order to clarify that this is not how we deal with non-banned connected users. An admin helped out two months ago (by changing "should" to "may") but even this change will have to be made in more places. Thanks! Connor Behan ( talk) 18:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
I have removed some broken links, to suburbs that do not have a dedicated Wikipedia page C A T ( talk) 09:47, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey there! You said I could leave a message on your talk page. Not wanting to step on anyones toes or be violating rules however changed the copy back to original as what you altered and edited it to doesn't align with the show's story and misconstrues a few characters and points. Our brief wasn't copy and paste and isn't on the show's website or anything like that, it has been worded accordingly for wikipedia so we'd like if you could please leave and keep as is. Understand and respect yourself, time and wikipedia however, incorrect synopsis isn't right either. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TVeditor7 ( talk • contribs) 06:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying. Understand and appreciate your response. How can I go about getting the permission to upload the pic to show you? And that's fine regarding copy. I have left as you reverted it back to except for one line about the girlfriend and the graduation. But I see what you mean. No copying and pasting ever. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TVeditor7 ( talk • contribs) 07:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
TO THE RESCUE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuackityHQReal ( talk • contribs) 00:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Is there any reason why there can't be at least some imagery in this section on the Flag of Australia article?
Aussieflagfan ( talk) 08:38, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
I tried to put in a change request and it was removed. I am still trying to be come familiar with the rules of where to edit stuff. The motorway has been extended to Ballina a couple of years ago and it is named Pacific Motorway in google maps. It is designated M1 on the road signage as well. Iainturville1 ( talk) 13:10, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Where can I find the official documentation that the Pacific Motorway is gazetted between Brisbane to the southern turn off at Brunswick Heads. If there is no document online who can I contact to get hold of the main roads gazette and possibly make a request to get the section between Brunswick Heads to Ballina renamed to Pacific Motorway. Probably be pointless as the motorway will be extended to Coffs Harbour in 2020 and to Newcastle in 2023. Iainturville1 ( talk) 08:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
? [2] JarrahTree 11:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Aussie Legend can we talk abut Glenworth Valley/Popran valley? Many thanks. Ad lsm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad lsm ( talk • contribs) 06:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC) Aussie Legend can we talk abut Glenworth Valley/Popran valley? Many thanks. Ad lsm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad lsm ( talk • contribs) 06:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi AussieLegend thanks so much for your help on the Popran Valley site. Not sure whether you have visited the Valley but noted your interest in the Hunter Region and hoping you can help on this. The Popran has a fascinating history - both indigenous and European including the convict connection through the Kelly family.
So: are you able to give me a hand on this site? Any advice much appreciated. Ad lsm. Ad lsm ( talk) 11:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for all of your editing. I was hoping you could add 2 categories to the Infoboxes on television and movies? Thought of doing it myself but I don't want to ruin everyone's hard work. I'm requesting that below or above Cinematography - we add ...
Production Design
Costume Design
Both are important elements to the overall look of the show or movie. A lot of production and costume designers have extensive wiki pages, so it would be great to include everyone on the Project page infobox.
If you're able to help with that, thank you so much on behalf of the entire creative teams in production! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smashinga ( talk • contribs) 18:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey, if you're going to refactor the heritage section I'm adding, like here, can you not remove the links? I'm not bothered if you want to reword or reorganise stuff, but the whole point of adding these is so the articles I'm imminently creating aren't orphans, so de-linking and adding possibly-unnecessary content to the town article is unhelpful. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 03:37, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm totally willing to defer to local knowledge- I'm finding that hard to believe given that you seem to be ignoring everything that I say.
Alternatively, you could passive-aggressively remove links- People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. I made quite valid chages and, instead of just restoring your link you completely reverted everything. Even here you've ignored the clarification that I made of the location of the site and the distances, even reverting the heading change without any explanation of why you think those are unhelpful. So please, criticise me when you have done nothing wrong. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 06:29, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
and partially and unnecessarily duplicate those articles in the town articlesI never did that. The articles didn't exist when I made the changes.
You did partially and unnecessarily duplicate the content you knew I was about to create- Again, look at the article edit histories. I created the content prior to 2AM today. You created Tomago House and Chapel at 2:21 PM, over 12 hours after me, and Dunmore Bridge over the Paterson River 22 minutes after that, so I don't see how I could possibly have duplicated content that didn't exist when I created it. I don't see anything in the articles that you created about Tomago Road being the main road between the Pacific Highway and Newcastle Airport or that the chapel is 250m from the house, [6] or that Clarence Town Road is the main road between various locations. [7] I didn't actually add much to either article and what I did add was the least amount of information that should have been included. What specific content do you claim I duplicated? Regardless, getting upset that somebody has created content before you have is something that should not happen. That happens all of the time.
there's no compelling need for a duplicate section in the town article just because you felt like removing the links I'd added.- That's not at all what happened and I resent the accusation. In fact I edited both articles because, with only one entry, "has a number of heritage-listed sites, including:" is a silly way to state things. While "1" is technically a number, that format is normally only used when there are multiple items. The edits I made were to expand the section, nothing more. At the Woodville article I also made a number of edits to fix errors in other sections of the article. It really is inappropriate to make baseless allegations. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 08:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
You create a big slab of content- at Tomago, New South Wales the content changed the article size by a mere 38 words. At Woodville, New South Wales it was 32 words. Neither of those could be considered a "big slab".
on the same subject in the town article that doesn't really fit there- Of course it fits there. There's absolutely no problem. It's all relevant and verifiable.
making it a pain to integrate with the material I'm adding- It doesn't do that at all as my "big slabs" of content don't affect you creating a new article and after you've created an article you haven't added anything to the article that links to it. All you have to do if the changed or removed links don't fit the new article name is to either restore the link (easily done! [8] [9]) or name the new article appropriately. If you had done the latter in both cases, you wouldn't have had any issues.
but if you're going to insist on being confrontational- I'm certainly not being confrontational. You are the one who has reverted valid changes and you are the one who has accused me more than once of doing something I haven't done or of knowing something I certainly didn't.
I can always revert until you stop- That's not being confrontational? Worse, threatening to try to start an edit-war or be deliberately obstructive is not something an experienced editor should do and would certainly not end well.
Thank you for your very detailed explanation on Robloxian56's talk page regarding when season articles are appropriate. Makes a lot of sense. With your permission, will utilize in future explanations to other editors. Onel5969 TT me 16:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I posted in what I believe was the correct section but I haven't seen any responses. Do you have any advice for me?
Thank you
/info/en/?search=Template_talk:Infobox_television — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smashinga ( talk • contribs) 21:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my edit on the Arrowverse template, I have spoke to the editor who deleted the page as it wasn't actually a copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt14451 ( talk • contribs) 08:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. Your bold move of
Church Hill, Sydney has been reverted because an editor has found it to be controversial. Per
Wikipedia:Requested moves, a move request must be placed on the article's talk page, and the request be open for discussion for seven days, "
if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested". Such consensus is particularly required before moving a title with incoming links in order to create a disambiguation page at that title. If you believe that this move is appropriate, please initiate such a discussion to form the appropriate consensus. Again, please note that moving a page with a longstanding title and/or a large number of incoming links is more likely to be considered controversial, and may be contested.
XP-93 (
talk)
05:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
You are very very politically...pfff. In the case of Nigeria and Sudan, put data recalculated daily ... and many other countries. In some states you put an exaggerated population, and in other states you cut 10 million. You are not impartial. Politically obvious. You are not interested in official census ... you are not interested in official data... of course you are promoting the UN, promoting data calculated 20 years ago. In some countries calculate manually 199, 245... peoples per day, ar random. I'm not a big legend like you, I'm not the chief of bosses ... and I'm not interested in living from the wiki like you. It does not make sense to waste time with you, put what you want ... the boss is the boss. The big disadvantage on the wiki is that ... the political chief put what he wants and the others contribute in vain :))). MIHAIL 07:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Please do not delete your wikipedia pages because we have stated that they are incomplete and that we will add further information along the way. Thank you. Alex Olaru ( talk) 09:11, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Can you be a good person and look at Murder of Kylie Maybury to see if it needs any tweaks at all? Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 10:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Discuss — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noramiao ( talk • contribs) 16:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
I said I did discuss it, because I sent him this message :
" Dude !!![edit source] 1. Stop wasting my time.
2. Stop interrupting anyone.
3. The oldest information should be updated.
4. Rank doesn't mean sovereignty is taken away.
5. Look the CIA standard for ranking.
6. Look the Spanish version, the French, the Russian, etc.
99% of the versions are using the ranks and all entities are
NUMBERRED.
7. You need to STOP.
You can not tell people in England that they should drive on
the roads the same way as Americans in USA drive. Everyone
works different.
Read 100 times again #2. ′ "
Also I'm trying to figure it out how to sign Noramiao ( talk) 16:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Everyone works different- Wikipedia is a collaborative effort by thousands of editors. We have a Manual of Style and numerous policies and guidelines that all editors are expected to follow. You can't expect to make edits to an article that do not comply with the MOS, policies and guidelines without etting negative feedback. You have to try to work like everyone else does. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 17:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
(Hey, I'm not sure how else to message you so I am doing it on here. ) Why are you deleting my edits? -- Lorisa214 ( talk) 07:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Just wondering, did you file an SPI on Allylyric (and Noramiao)...? If not, were you planning on it? Couple of DUCKs right there if I ever saw any... Anyway, I was just curious. Cheers - wolf 06:08, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
I left a note for User talk:Alex Shih that some bastard is whittling away at Dave Hughes but you might be more interested and more capable of fixing it. MBG02 ( talk) 08:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi AussieLegend,
I noticed there's a leftover bracket ("}") after the High Lord Togneme Vicarus userbox on your user page. As I'm not a fan of other people editing my user page (even if in good faith), I'm hesitant to do so at others'. I thought I just let you know instead. Kind regards, soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
User AussieLegend,
You have got the wrong person. I guess I share an IP address with someone who's vandalizing the Wizards of Waverly Place article. I haven't edited a Wiki articles in at least 10 years, and I've certainly never vandalized one. Please do not message me again.
Cheers,
Patrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.99.204 ( talk) 16:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T:ITV. Since you had some involvement with the T:ITV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Here [11]. This has gone on way too long. Thanks, JNW ( talk) 14:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
BintangWiki Asli | |
thank you has repair my article but you don't deleted or removed my article Dimas gilang ( talk) 04:35, 27 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hey,
In your recent change to the doc at
Template:Infobox television episode/doc with The number of the episode within the season or series.
, did you mean by "series" the alternate word for "season" or the TV series as a whole (so as an example - E. 4 of S. 2 in a 10 episode season, would be 14)? --
Gonnym (
talk)
08:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Typically, "series" is used for television series produced within the United Kingdom while "season" is used for American television series.i.e., where the US uses "season", the UK uses "series". We're clearly talking about individual "seasons" here, not the series as a whole. That's why they're combined in the documentation. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 08:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
did you meandoesn't make any sense since I didn't mean anything. The meaning in the text was already present and what I did didn't change anything. I simply fixed errors in the documentation. Now, if you can't be civil here, please don't visit my talkpage again. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 14:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
mainly capitalisation fixes and addition of underscores where appropriatewhich I didn't even mention, so stop acting as if you've answered what you thought I meant. Your addition, while fine, opened it up for misinterpretation by editors who can think that it is ok now to write the overall episode number instead of the season number, as you know, the rest of the world sees "series" as the actual "TV series" and not season. But whatever. -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Typically, "series" is used for television series produced within the United Kingdom while "season" is used for American television seriesexplains that the terminology is different in different countries. Note that before that the documentation says "The number of the season (or series) this episode is part of". The next row in the documentation said "The number of the episode within the season" so the change to "The number of the episode within the season or series" should be self explanatory. The previous two rows talk about "the season or series" so "or series" is clearly referring to the UK (and Australian and other countries) equivalent of the US season. It was therefore unnecessary to ask what I was referring to and the fact that you needed to ask gave the impression that you were, at best, confused. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 14:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
If you're going to add fake warnings to my talk page then this discussion is over. Please don't come back or we're going to end up an ANI. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 15:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
I don't understand how to edit a wikipedia article at least it's wrong Dimas gilang ( talk) 05:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC) |
The Special Barnstar | |
I don't understand how to edit a wikipedia article at least it's wrong Dimas gilang ( talk) 05:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC) |
Instead of leaving these silly banners on user talk pages, please read your own talk pge, follow the advice given there and learn how to edit articles in accordance with our policies and guidelines. Sending I love you messages after you have screwed up because you completely ignored advice does not help! -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 08:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
The No Spam Barnstar | |
please don't moving & editing my article on draft Dimas gilang ( talk) 00:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC) |
Quick question so hopefully this won't get derailed by both of us into an argument. Regarding your comment of To be honest, I'd love to see both templates deleted but Infobox television season/custom is used in 232 articles.
- what are your thoughts of using modules instead of that template and adding a module field to {{
Infobox television season}}? Pros: smaller and easier to maintain and tailored to different types of series (reality competitions, amazing race, survivor, etc) and will allow us to have the good season infobox on much more TV series compared to the current situation where some use a different one. --
Gonnym (
talk)
16:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey! I just thought I'd drop you a line about welcoming new users who are editing constructively. I went to welcome this IP, and saw the message you'd previously left for them. Don't get me wrong, using templates correctly important! But there's a better way to welcome new users to the project than two sentences about what they're doing wrong. It's really easy to scare off a new user who's figuring their way around the project. Just some food for thought. Happy editing! cymru.lass ( talk • contribs) 00:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
If you do take this user to WP:ANI (and there's no question this should go to ANI now), please either drop me a line or ping me, as that's one ANI discussion I will definitely contribute to and follow. But this user merits an WP:INDEF by this point. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 05:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
User:Dimas gilang has now been indef'ed at ANI. If you take any of this editor's articles to WP:AfD, please drop me a line – IMO, every article User:Dimas gilang has created will need to be deleted... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 05:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AussieLegend. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AussieLegend. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I pinged you on my talk page regarding the conversion of the Big Brother sidebar into a infobox module to the season infobox. I was wondering if it should be used for only Big Brother articles, or should the scope cover more articles? Currently it has 3 parameters which are more general - |host=
, |winner=
, |runner_up=
; and 3 parameters which are more specific to Big Brother - |number_days=
, |number_housemates=
, |companion_show=
and one custom parameter.
|winner=
and |runner_up=
and the |starring=
from the season infobox. Though it also has |teams=
from
Template:Infobox television season/custom (which can either be added or not included).|host=
, |winner=
and |runner_up=
and maybe |starring=
instead of a |Judges=
(though this can also be fixed as a switch case for the label).|Judges=
, |coaches=
, |celebrity_winner=
, |professional_winner=
, |winner_song=
, |winner_genre=
, |winner_mentor=
|winner_origin=
and |finals_venue=
. Though, if some of these are considered not needed, it might work.|num_tasks=
which is currently not in the Big Brother module.Any thoughts/input? -- Gonnym ( talk) 13:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
I actually took the original image to the white background. You owe me an apology for accusing me vandalism.-- NeoBatfreak ( talk) 09:33, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year 2019! | |
Hi AussieLegend! Thank you for all the hard work and effort you put into Wikipedia. God bless! Onel5969 TT me 14:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC) |
You are invited to a WP:TV discussion about Pigsonthewing and his actions on the infoboxes. BattleshipMan ( talk) 22:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy Christmas! | ||
Hello AussieLegend, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD| Talk 07:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hi AussieLegend ok thanks for the message and sorry it just didn't make sense to keep all on one just two i was just doing the right thing but ok. User talk:TMarrofficialuser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmarrofficialuser ( talk • contribs) 06:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
| |
Hi AussieLegend, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas |
Why do you keep reverting my addition to the MOS? Do you actually have a reason to oppose the proposed change? If so, could you state it in the MOS's talk page? BarbadosKen ( talk) 16:04, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
I see that you consider the discussion closed without answering my question as to how long you think a discussion should remain open without attracting opposition in order to assume a consensus. I will therefore arbitrarily set the time at 1 week, upon which I will revert your reversion if no opposition is provided in the MOS talk page. At that point, if you revert me again, I will file a complaint against you. BarbadosKen ( talk) 16:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
With special emphasis on "It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date." Cheers, ErikHaugen ( talk | contribs) 19:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey there, I was just wondering if you were able to assist me on the latest edits on the Total Divas page. There is a user who claims just because there is not a source to provide for recurring and guest characters, it should entirely be removed with all recurring cast members being reverted to guests. This to me is inaccurate, as they are trying to determine a cast members status based on their personal views. Whereas the difference between a recurring and guest are based on the amount of episodes they appeared in, and the amount of involvement they have with the storyline/main cast members. Also, this seems like a bold edit as every other television show on Wikipedia contains these types of tables, determining main, recurring, and guest characters, so I find it rather silly that this user is targeting this one show yet none of the other shows. Anywho, any assist would be beneficial, and I'm not looking for "back up" as I am open to change, but I want it to be for the right reasons and accurate representations. I do not want to engage in an edit war with them, nor cross any boundaries with Wikipedia. Thanks! MSMRHurricane ( talk) 20:17, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Just wanted to follow up this: "fails to meet category inclusion criteria - episodes have not yet aired in 2019"? The inclusion criteria is "television seasons that aired at least one episode in 2019". 5x16 just aired today, January 2, 2019 Canadian time. If I'm unaware of new criteria, please inform me. If it was a mistake, please be careful in the future and check the air dates of any episodes that have aired before reverting correct edits. -- / Alex/ 21 07:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm restoring your removal of the block element from TemplateData and I wanted to show to you what it does in case you might not have known.
When adding the Infobox television template using TemplateData without it, it placed the information like this: {{Infobox television|show_name=test|genre=horror|director=director}}
When adding Infobox television episode template, using TemplateData, which has it, it placed the information like this:
{{Infobox television episode | title = lost | series = 3 | episode = 2 }}
Since the documentation and general practice, is to always place the infobox as a block, it's important to have that element listed. -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:41, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
{{Infobox television|show_name=test|genre=horror|director=director}}
(i.e. what Dimas gilang) was doing is not correct. The results from other editors didn't cause this. That seems to have been a deliberate insertion by Dimas gilang as evidenced by his other edits where he obviously knew exactly how to format the infobox clorrectly,
for example. The formatting that you removed
here seemed to work perfectly for a year before you removed it. That formatting was added
here and worked perfectly without any issues until you tried to fix Dimas gilang's probem. I'm going to ping
JJMC89 since he added that code and might be able to provide some input on this issue. --
AussieLegend (
✉)
14:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
{{Infobox television | show_name = | image = | image_upright = | image_size = | image_alt = | caption =
is correct. Inclusion of "format": "block"
resulted in spaces between the fieldname and "=" being stripped by any edit using the visual editor, i.e. the following resulted:
{{Infobox television | show_name = | image = | image_upright = | image_size = | image_alt = | caption =
-- AussieLegend ( ✉) 15:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Oh ok, as I thought, miscommunication. Well that specific thing is really missing from the documentation over at TemplateData. I'll update the episode one also later to fit it as it indeed better. A shame block doesn't actually format that way. -- Gonnym ( talk) 15:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Another question, what does the "R" in "RTitle"/"RNext"/"RPrev" in Infobox television episode stand for? -- Gonnym ( talk) 11:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello! This is a generic message created and copied to all editors using scripts that I have created. As I have recently changed my username from " User:AlexTheWhovian" to " User:Alex 21", any scripts that I have created that are listed at your common.js page may, at the moment, no longer be working. To fix this, simply update all occurrences of "User:AlexTheWhovian" to "User:Alex 21"; see here for an example. All the best! -- / Alex/ 21 11:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
How do you earn a barnstar and all those kinda things?? I am bone123 ( talk) 20:08, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Give me strength. Some new user and Alex21 (FKA Alex the Whovian) created season articles for S1 and S2 of the Crown with no meaningful content. Meanwhile, the List of episodes page redirects back to the main article, so there's no episodes page, just these two season pages with no content aside from the episodes and cast list. I'm going to redirect them and create the episodes page later today. I'm never confident I'll do it correctly. Would you mind being a pal and checking my work once it's done? And Happy New Year, or is that in six months? ----Dr.Margi ✉ 20:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Infobox television season/cleanup, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gonnym ( talk) 08:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Just a little tip going forward: while G6 is okay to use, the redirects resulting from moves to draftspace can actually be deleted under R2, which covers redirects to both draftspace and userspace from mainspace. Evad37's MoveToDraft script can automate this process as well. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Sir I have corrected all the mistakes and I wanted you to please move it to mainpage right on 2 hrs. Otherwise I will create new page and paste it without any doubt because today is the broadcasting date of this show. Sir,You have only one option to choose Thank You Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk) 01:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Is there any use for Template:Infobox television/sandbox/doc or can it be deleted? -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:51, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey AussieLegend. I recently updated the The_Last_Man_on_Earth_(TV_series) page to say it "was an American post-apocalyptic comedy television series . . ." but you reverted the edit back to "is an American post-apocalyptic comedy television series . . .". In light of the series being canceled, shouldn't the description be in the past tense now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorenmaxwell ( talk • contribs) 12:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Just in case you were unaware, all the Plot Summaries on The Grand Tour have been reduced so that they have less than 200 words. The only one that hasn't been changed is Colombia Part 2. ( talk) 17:54, 31 January 2019 (GMT)
Hey Aussie Legend, Firstly I would like to apologise if there was any instances where I came across as rude or obnoxious, taking on board your criticism and making logical edits to pages such as Hell's Kitchen or The Grand Tour. Thank you very much for your assistance. Secondly I'd like to report the following user @ Alex 21: who appears to be bullying and harassing other users, threatening them with Blocking about edit wars, often being obstructive and rude when they make changes to articles. He is currently under investigation by the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. MichaelCorleone7 ( talk) 22:20, 13 February 2019 (GMT)
Replied on the talk page. ATC . Talk 01:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank You for Your Suggestions.I shall follow it. Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk) 08:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 |
These things happened on the show though, so they’ve been confirmed and the bit about Halloween VI involving Cindy should have detailed that without question. Futuremoviewriter ( talk) 18:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Will you accept clips of the specific scenes as citations? Futuremoviewriter ( talk) 19:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Based on their recent edits today and ignoring talk page messages, I'm sensing some WP:CIR issues here. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 23:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I don't understand the last reverse on Tanked. It's the subject of the episode, as indicated on the AnimalPlanet page, and as such, I don't see how it would be seen as a © infrigement... Anyhow, if that's the case, you must also delete all the other short summaries I added, because I all took them from their web page. Or just adding quotes around the summaries would be sufficient ? I'll admit I'm quite lost here, as it would seem that it enters the realm of the fair citation use, it's only a phrase... Dunno. Not a lawyer, not even an english first tonger, so I'll leave the decisions in your hands. -- Arnaud
Ok, good luck with the summaries then. -- Arnaud —Preceding undated comment added 21:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you look like a pretty active admin so I'm wondering if you can take a look at this.
My goal is to change "all edits by them should be reverted on sight..." to "this user has been banned so edits by them may be reverted on sight..." in order to clarify that this is not how we deal with non-banned connected users. An admin helped out two months ago (by changing "should" to "may") but even this change will have to be made in more places. Thanks! Connor Behan ( talk) 18:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
I have removed some broken links, to suburbs that do not have a dedicated Wikipedia page C A T ( talk) 09:47, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey there! You said I could leave a message on your talk page. Not wanting to step on anyones toes or be violating rules however changed the copy back to original as what you altered and edited it to doesn't align with the show's story and misconstrues a few characters and points. Our brief wasn't copy and paste and isn't on the show's website or anything like that, it has been worded accordingly for wikipedia so we'd like if you could please leave and keep as is. Understand and respect yourself, time and wikipedia however, incorrect synopsis isn't right either. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TVeditor7 ( talk • contribs) 06:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying. Understand and appreciate your response. How can I go about getting the permission to upload the pic to show you? And that's fine regarding copy. I have left as you reverted it back to except for one line about the girlfriend and the graduation. But I see what you mean. No copying and pasting ever. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TVeditor7 ( talk • contribs) 07:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
TO THE RESCUE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuackityHQReal ( talk • contribs) 00:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Is there any reason why there can't be at least some imagery in this section on the Flag of Australia article?
Aussieflagfan ( talk) 08:38, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
I tried to put in a change request and it was removed. I am still trying to be come familiar with the rules of where to edit stuff. The motorway has been extended to Ballina a couple of years ago and it is named Pacific Motorway in google maps. It is designated M1 on the road signage as well. Iainturville1 ( talk) 13:10, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Where can I find the official documentation that the Pacific Motorway is gazetted between Brisbane to the southern turn off at Brunswick Heads. If there is no document online who can I contact to get hold of the main roads gazette and possibly make a request to get the section between Brunswick Heads to Ballina renamed to Pacific Motorway. Probably be pointless as the motorway will be extended to Coffs Harbour in 2020 and to Newcastle in 2023. Iainturville1 ( talk) 08:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
? [2] JarrahTree 11:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Aussie Legend can we talk abut Glenworth Valley/Popran valley? Many thanks. Ad lsm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad lsm ( talk • contribs) 06:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC) Aussie Legend can we talk abut Glenworth Valley/Popran valley? Many thanks. Ad lsm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad lsm ( talk • contribs) 06:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi AussieLegend thanks so much for your help on the Popran Valley site. Not sure whether you have visited the Valley but noted your interest in the Hunter Region and hoping you can help on this. The Popran has a fascinating history - both indigenous and European including the convict connection through the Kelly family.
So: are you able to give me a hand on this site? Any advice much appreciated. Ad lsm. Ad lsm ( talk) 11:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for all of your editing. I was hoping you could add 2 categories to the Infoboxes on television and movies? Thought of doing it myself but I don't want to ruin everyone's hard work. I'm requesting that below or above Cinematography - we add ...
Production Design
Costume Design
Both are important elements to the overall look of the show or movie. A lot of production and costume designers have extensive wiki pages, so it would be great to include everyone on the Project page infobox.
If you're able to help with that, thank you so much on behalf of the entire creative teams in production! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smashinga ( talk • contribs) 18:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey, if you're going to refactor the heritage section I'm adding, like here, can you not remove the links? I'm not bothered if you want to reword or reorganise stuff, but the whole point of adding these is so the articles I'm imminently creating aren't orphans, so de-linking and adding possibly-unnecessary content to the town article is unhelpful. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 03:37, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm totally willing to defer to local knowledge- I'm finding that hard to believe given that you seem to be ignoring everything that I say.
Alternatively, you could passive-aggressively remove links- People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. I made quite valid chages and, instead of just restoring your link you completely reverted everything. Even here you've ignored the clarification that I made of the location of the site and the distances, even reverting the heading change without any explanation of why you think those are unhelpful. So please, criticise me when you have done nothing wrong. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 06:29, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
and partially and unnecessarily duplicate those articles in the town articlesI never did that. The articles didn't exist when I made the changes.
You did partially and unnecessarily duplicate the content you knew I was about to create- Again, look at the article edit histories. I created the content prior to 2AM today. You created Tomago House and Chapel at 2:21 PM, over 12 hours after me, and Dunmore Bridge over the Paterson River 22 minutes after that, so I don't see how I could possibly have duplicated content that didn't exist when I created it. I don't see anything in the articles that you created about Tomago Road being the main road between the Pacific Highway and Newcastle Airport or that the chapel is 250m from the house, [6] or that Clarence Town Road is the main road between various locations. [7] I didn't actually add much to either article and what I did add was the least amount of information that should have been included. What specific content do you claim I duplicated? Regardless, getting upset that somebody has created content before you have is something that should not happen. That happens all of the time.
there's no compelling need for a duplicate section in the town article just because you felt like removing the links I'd added.- That's not at all what happened and I resent the accusation. In fact I edited both articles because, with only one entry, "has a number of heritage-listed sites, including:" is a silly way to state things. While "1" is technically a number, that format is normally only used when there are multiple items. The edits I made were to expand the section, nothing more. At the Woodville article I also made a number of edits to fix errors in other sections of the article. It really is inappropriate to make baseless allegations. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 08:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
You create a big slab of content- at Tomago, New South Wales the content changed the article size by a mere 38 words. At Woodville, New South Wales it was 32 words. Neither of those could be considered a "big slab".
on the same subject in the town article that doesn't really fit there- Of course it fits there. There's absolutely no problem. It's all relevant and verifiable.
making it a pain to integrate with the material I'm adding- It doesn't do that at all as my "big slabs" of content don't affect you creating a new article and after you've created an article you haven't added anything to the article that links to it. All you have to do if the changed or removed links don't fit the new article name is to either restore the link (easily done! [8] [9]) or name the new article appropriately. If you had done the latter in both cases, you wouldn't have had any issues.
but if you're going to insist on being confrontational- I'm certainly not being confrontational. You are the one who has reverted valid changes and you are the one who has accused me more than once of doing something I haven't done or of knowing something I certainly didn't.
I can always revert until you stop- That's not being confrontational? Worse, threatening to try to start an edit-war or be deliberately obstructive is not something an experienced editor should do and would certainly not end well.
Thank you for your very detailed explanation on Robloxian56's talk page regarding when season articles are appropriate. Makes a lot of sense. With your permission, will utilize in future explanations to other editors. Onel5969 TT me 16:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I posted in what I believe was the correct section but I haven't seen any responses. Do you have any advice for me?
Thank you
/info/en/?search=Template_talk:Infobox_television — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smashinga ( talk • contribs) 21:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my edit on the Arrowverse template, I have spoke to the editor who deleted the page as it wasn't actually a copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt14451 ( talk • contribs) 08:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. Your bold move of
Church Hill, Sydney has been reverted because an editor has found it to be controversial. Per
Wikipedia:Requested moves, a move request must be placed on the article's talk page, and the request be open for discussion for seven days, "
if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested". Such consensus is particularly required before moving a title with incoming links in order to create a disambiguation page at that title. If you believe that this move is appropriate, please initiate such a discussion to form the appropriate consensus. Again, please note that moving a page with a longstanding title and/or a large number of incoming links is more likely to be considered controversial, and may be contested.
XP-93 (
talk)
05:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
You are very very politically...pfff. In the case of Nigeria and Sudan, put data recalculated daily ... and many other countries. In some states you put an exaggerated population, and in other states you cut 10 million. You are not impartial. Politically obvious. You are not interested in official census ... you are not interested in official data... of course you are promoting the UN, promoting data calculated 20 years ago. In some countries calculate manually 199, 245... peoples per day, ar random. I'm not a big legend like you, I'm not the chief of bosses ... and I'm not interested in living from the wiki like you. It does not make sense to waste time with you, put what you want ... the boss is the boss. The big disadvantage on the wiki is that ... the political chief put what he wants and the others contribute in vain :))). MIHAIL 07:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Please do not delete your wikipedia pages because we have stated that they are incomplete and that we will add further information along the way. Thank you. Alex Olaru ( talk) 09:11, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Can you be a good person and look at Murder of Kylie Maybury to see if it needs any tweaks at all? Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 10:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Discuss — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noramiao ( talk • contribs) 16:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
I said I did discuss it, because I sent him this message :
" Dude !!![edit source] 1. Stop wasting my time.
2. Stop interrupting anyone.
3. The oldest information should be updated.
4. Rank doesn't mean sovereignty is taken away.
5. Look the CIA standard for ranking.
6. Look the Spanish version, the French, the Russian, etc.
99% of the versions are using the ranks and all entities are
NUMBERRED.
7. You need to STOP.
You can not tell people in England that they should drive on
the roads the same way as Americans in USA drive. Everyone
works different.
Read 100 times again #2. ′ "
Also I'm trying to figure it out how to sign Noramiao ( talk) 16:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Everyone works different- Wikipedia is a collaborative effort by thousands of editors. We have a Manual of Style and numerous policies and guidelines that all editors are expected to follow. You can't expect to make edits to an article that do not comply with the MOS, policies and guidelines without etting negative feedback. You have to try to work like everyone else does. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 17:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
(Hey, I'm not sure how else to message you so I am doing it on here. ) Why are you deleting my edits? -- Lorisa214 ( talk) 07:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Just wondering, did you file an SPI on Allylyric (and Noramiao)...? If not, were you planning on it? Couple of DUCKs right there if I ever saw any... Anyway, I was just curious. Cheers - wolf 06:08, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
I left a note for User talk:Alex Shih that some bastard is whittling away at Dave Hughes but you might be more interested and more capable of fixing it. MBG02 ( talk) 08:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi AussieLegend,
I noticed there's a leftover bracket ("}") after the High Lord Togneme Vicarus userbox on your user page. As I'm not a fan of other people editing my user page (even if in good faith), I'm hesitant to do so at others'. I thought I just let you know instead. Kind regards, soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
User AussieLegend,
You have got the wrong person. I guess I share an IP address with someone who's vandalizing the Wizards of Waverly Place article. I haven't edited a Wiki articles in at least 10 years, and I've certainly never vandalized one. Please do not message me again.
Cheers,
Patrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.99.204 ( talk) 16:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T:ITV. Since you had some involvement with the T:ITV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Here [11]. This has gone on way too long. Thanks, JNW ( talk) 14:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
BintangWiki Asli | |
thank you has repair my article but you don't deleted or removed my article Dimas gilang ( talk) 04:35, 27 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hey,
In your recent change to the doc at
Template:Infobox television episode/doc with The number of the episode within the season or series.
, did you mean by "series" the alternate word for "season" or the TV series as a whole (so as an example - E. 4 of S. 2 in a 10 episode season, would be 14)? --
Gonnym (
talk)
08:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Typically, "series" is used for television series produced within the United Kingdom while "season" is used for American television series.i.e., where the US uses "season", the UK uses "series". We're clearly talking about individual "seasons" here, not the series as a whole. That's why they're combined in the documentation. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 08:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
did you meandoesn't make any sense since I didn't mean anything. The meaning in the text was already present and what I did didn't change anything. I simply fixed errors in the documentation. Now, if you can't be civil here, please don't visit my talkpage again. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 14:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
mainly capitalisation fixes and addition of underscores where appropriatewhich I didn't even mention, so stop acting as if you've answered what you thought I meant. Your addition, while fine, opened it up for misinterpretation by editors who can think that it is ok now to write the overall episode number instead of the season number, as you know, the rest of the world sees "series" as the actual "TV series" and not season. But whatever. -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Typically, "series" is used for television series produced within the United Kingdom while "season" is used for American television seriesexplains that the terminology is different in different countries. Note that before that the documentation says "The number of the season (or series) this episode is part of". The next row in the documentation said "The number of the episode within the season" so the change to "The number of the episode within the season or series" should be self explanatory. The previous two rows talk about "the season or series" so "or series" is clearly referring to the UK (and Australian and other countries) equivalent of the US season. It was therefore unnecessary to ask what I was referring to and the fact that you needed to ask gave the impression that you were, at best, confused. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 14:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
If you're going to add fake warnings to my talk page then this discussion is over. Please don't come back or we're going to end up an ANI. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 15:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
I don't understand how to edit a wikipedia article at least it's wrong Dimas gilang ( talk) 05:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC) |
The Special Barnstar | |
I don't understand how to edit a wikipedia article at least it's wrong Dimas gilang ( talk) 05:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC) |
Instead of leaving these silly banners on user talk pages, please read your own talk pge, follow the advice given there and learn how to edit articles in accordance with our policies and guidelines. Sending I love you messages after you have screwed up because you completely ignored advice does not help! -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 08:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
The No Spam Barnstar | |
please don't moving & editing my article on draft Dimas gilang ( talk) 00:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC) |
Quick question so hopefully this won't get derailed by both of us into an argument. Regarding your comment of To be honest, I'd love to see both templates deleted but Infobox television season/custom is used in 232 articles.
- what are your thoughts of using modules instead of that template and adding a module field to {{
Infobox television season}}? Pros: smaller and easier to maintain and tailored to different types of series (reality competitions, amazing race, survivor, etc) and will allow us to have the good season infobox on much more TV series compared to the current situation where some use a different one. --
Gonnym (
talk)
16:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey! I just thought I'd drop you a line about welcoming new users who are editing constructively. I went to welcome this IP, and saw the message you'd previously left for them. Don't get me wrong, using templates correctly important! But there's a better way to welcome new users to the project than two sentences about what they're doing wrong. It's really easy to scare off a new user who's figuring their way around the project. Just some food for thought. Happy editing! cymru.lass ( talk • contribs) 00:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
If you do take this user to WP:ANI (and there's no question this should go to ANI now), please either drop me a line or ping me, as that's one ANI discussion I will definitely contribute to and follow. But this user merits an WP:INDEF by this point. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 05:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
User:Dimas gilang has now been indef'ed at ANI. If you take any of this editor's articles to WP:AfD, please drop me a line – IMO, every article User:Dimas gilang has created will need to be deleted... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 05:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AussieLegend. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AussieLegend. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I pinged you on my talk page regarding the conversion of the Big Brother sidebar into a infobox module to the season infobox. I was wondering if it should be used for only Big Brother articles, or should the scope cover more articles? Currently it has 3 parameters which are more general - |host=
, |winner=
, |runner_up=
; and 3 parameters which are more specific to Big Brother - |number_days=
, |number_housemates=
, |companion_show=
and one custom parameter.
|winner=
and |runner_up=
and the |starring=
from the season infobox. Though it also has |teams=
from
Template:Infobox television season/custom (which can either be added or not included).|host=
, |winner=
and |runner_up=
and maybe |starring=
instead of a |Judges=
(though this can also be fixed as a switch case for the label).|Judges=
, |coaches=
, |celebrity_winner=
, |professional_winner=
, |winner_song=
, |winner_genre=
, |winner_mentor=
|winner_origin=
and |finals_venue=
. Though, if some of these are considered not needed, it might work.|num_tasks=
which is currently not in the Big Brother module.Any thoughts/input? -- Gonnym ( talk) 13:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
I actually took the original image to the white background. You owe me an apology for accusing me vandalism.-- NeoBatfreak ( talk) 09:33, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year 2019! | |
Hi AussieLegend! Thank you for all the hard work and effort you put into Wikipedia. God bless! Onel5969 TT me 14:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC) |
You are invited to a WP:TV discussion about Pigsonthewing and his actions on the infoboxes. BattleshipMan ( talk) 22:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy Christmas! | ||
Hello AussieLegend, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD| Talk 07:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hi AussieLegend ok thanks for the message and sorry it just didn't make sense to keep all on one just two i was just doing the right thing but ok. User talk:TMarrofficialuser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmarrofficialuser ( talk • contribs) 06:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
| |
Hi AussieLegend, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas |
Why do you keep reverting my addition to the MOS? Do you actually have a reason to oppose the proposed change? If so, could you state it in the MOS's talk page? BarbadosKen ( talk) 16:04, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
I see that you consider the discussion closed without answering my question as to how long you think a discussion should remain open without attracting opposition in order to assume a consensus. I will therefore arbitrarily set the time at 1 week, upon which I will revert your reversion if no opposition is provided in the MOS talk page. At that point, if you revert me again, I will file a complaint against you. BarbadosKen ( talk) 16:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
With special emphasis on "It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date." Cheers, ErikHaugen ( talk | contribs) 19:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey there, I was just wondering if you were able to assist me on the latest edits on the Total Divas page. There is a user who claims just because there is not a source to provide for recurring and guest characters, it should entirely be removed with all recurring cast members being reverted to guests. This to me is inaccurate, as they are trying to determine a cast members status based on their personal views. Whereas the difference between a recurring and guest are based on the amount of episodes they appeared in, and the amount of involvement they have with the storyline/main cast members. Also, this seems like a bold edit as every other television show on Wikipedia contains these types of tables, determining main, recurring, and guest characters, so I find it rather silly that this user is targeting this one show yet none of the other shows. Anywho, any assist would be beneficial, and I'm not looking for "back up" as I am open to change, but I want it to be for the right reasons and accurate representations. I do not want to engage in an edit war with them, nor cross any boundaries with Wikipedia. Thanks! MSMRHurricane ( talk) 20:17, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Just wanted to follow up this: "fails to meet category inclusion criteria - episodes have not yet aired in 2019"? The inclusion criteria is "television seasons that aired at least one episode in 2019". 5x16 just aired today, January 2, 2019 Canadian time. If I'm unaware of new criteria, please inform me. If it was a mistake, please be careful in the future and check the air dates of any episodes that have aired before reverting correct edits. -- / Alex/ 21 07:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm restoring your removal of the block element from TemplateData and I wanted to show to you what it does in case you might not have known.
When adding the Infobox television template using TemplateData without it, it placed the information like this: {{Infobox television|show_name=test|genre=horror|director=director}}
When adding Infobox television episode template, using TemplateData, which has it, it placed the information like this:
{{Infobox television episode | title = lost | series = 3 | episode = 2 }}
Since the documentation and general practice, is to always place the infobox as a block, it's important to have that element listed. -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:41, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
{{Infobox television|show_name=test|genre=horror|director=director}}
(i.e. what Dimas gilang) was doing is not correct. The results from other editors didn't cause this. That seems to have been a deliberate insertion by Dimas gilang as evidenced by his other edits where he obviously knew exactly how to format the infobox clorrectly,
for example. The formatting that you removed
here seemed to work perfectly for a year before you removed it. That formatting was added
here and worked perfectly without any issues until you tried to fix Dimas gilang's probem. I'm going to ping
JJMC89 since he added that code and might be able to provide some input on this issue. --
AussieLegend (
✉)
14:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
{{Infobox television | show_name = | image = | image_upright = | image_size = | image_alt = | caption =
is correct. Inclusion of "format": "block"
resulted in spaces between the fieldname and "=" being stripped by any edit using the visual editor, i.e. the following resulted:
{{Infobox television | show_name = | image = | image_upright = | image_size = | image_alt = | caption =
-- AussieLegend ( ✉) 15:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Oh ok, as I thought, miscommunication. Well that specific thing is really missing from the documentation over at TemplateData. I'll update the episode one also later to fit it as it indeed better. A shame block doesn't actually format that way. -- Gonnym ( talk) 15:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Another question, what does the "R" in "RTitle"/"RNext"/"RPrev" in Infobox television episode stand for? -- Gonnym ( talk) 11:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello! This is a generic message created and copied to all editors using scripts that I have created. As I have recently changed my username from " User:AlexTheWhovian" to " User:Alex 21", any scripts that I have created that are listed at your common.js page may, at the moment, no longer be working. To fix this, simply update all occurrences of "User:AlexTheWhovian" to "User:Alex 21"; see here for an example. All the best! -- / Alex/ 21 11:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
How do you earn a barnstar and all those kinda things?? I am bone123 ( talk) 20:08, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Give me strength. Some new user and Alex21 (FKA Alex the Whovian) created season articles for S1 and S2 of the Crown with no meaningful content. Meanwhile, the List of episodes page redirects back to the main article, so there's no episodes page, just these two season pages with no content aside from the episodes and cast list. I'm going to redirect them and create the episodes page later today. I'm never confident I'll do it correctly. Would you mind being a pal and checking my work once it's done? And Happy New Year, or is that in six months? ----Dr.Margi ✉ 20:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Infobox television season/cleanup, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gonnym ( talk) 08:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Just a little tip going forward: while G6 is okay to use, the redirects resulting from moves to draftspace can actually be deleted under R2, which covers redirects to both draftspace and userspace from mainspace. Evad37's MoveToDraft script can automate this process as well. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Sir I have corrected all the mistakes and I wanted you to please move it to mainpage right on 2 hrs. Otherwise I will create new page and paste it without any doubt because today is the broadcasting date of this show. Sir,You have only one option to choose Thank You Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk) 01:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Is there any use for Template:Infobox television/sandbox/doc or can it be deleted? -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:51, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey AussieLegend. I recently updated the The_Last_Man_on_Earth_(TV_series) page to say it "was an American post-apocalyptic comedy television series . . ." but you reverted the edit back to "is an American post-apocalyptic comedy television series . . .". In light of the series being canceled, shouldn't the description be in the past tense now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorenmaxwell ( talk • contribs) 12:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Just in case you were unaware, all the Plot Summaries on The Grand Tour have been reduced so that they have less than 200 words. The only one that hasn't been changed is Colombia Part 2. ( talk) 17:54, 31 January 2019 (GMT)
Hey Aussie Legend, Firstly I would like to apologise if there was any instances where I came across as rude or obnoxious, taking on board your criticism and making logical edits to pages such as Hell's Kitchen or The Grand Tour. Thank you very much for your assistance. Secondly I'd like to report the following user @ Alex 21: who appears to be bullying and harassing other users, threatening them with Blocking about edit wars, often being obstructive and rude when they make changes to articles. He is currently under investigation by the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. MichaelCorleone7 ( talk) 22:20, 13 February 2019 (GMT)
Replied on the talk page. ATC . Talk 01:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank You for Your Suggestions.I shall follow it. Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk) 08:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)