Sorry I was slow, but I just saw your question and I posted a reply. Let me know if you have some VersionIDs. Cheers, Walkerma ( talk) 15:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Aude, I'm guessing the version selections will be made some time in the next 48 hours. If any are in bad shape, we can manually change the odd versionID afterwards. Walkerma ( talk) 09:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
The
October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
23:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
If you look at User talk:69.132.178.111 and his reply at my own User talk:Shakescene, you can see that Ben Popken now better understands the reaction he got to what he thought was an innocent attempt at helpfulness and seems receptive to any gentle, useful guidance anyone would like to offer. —— Shakescene ( talk) 22:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Never seem to have enough of it anymore...I am very appreciative that you have taken the time to make a few comments about the pallid sturgeon article and will address them before the weekend. IF pallid gets to FA, I will then be able to devote energy to collapse of the WTC article...and I still have a few more details to iron out on the Redwood NP article yet as well to keep it at FA level.-- MONGO 05:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Eagle barnstar is terrific! Thanks! -- Aude ( talk) 04:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Aude. I should be able to look over the article in the next few days. Does that work for you? Best regards, mo talk 02:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the kudos. Go (game) is a well-written article. It helped me better understand the game as well. Unfortunately, I'm horrible at strategy games. :) mo talk 03:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
My apologies for the delay in getting started on the copy edit. I'm working on a previous copy edit request, which is taking longer than I anticipated. I won't be offended if you ask another editor to look over it. mo talk 03:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
You may want to request a copy edit on the Guild of Copy Editors talk page. I'm behind on my current copy edit due to an ANI issue with which I had to deal this weekend. I'll check back with you when I'm finished with this one to find out whether or not the article still needs a copy edit. Thanks for your understanding, mo talk 03:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
I recently started the article Douglass Summer House and would like to add a link from the /* Family life */ section of the Frederick Douglass article to it. I see this is a protected article. I suggest the following sentence be added to the end of the third para of this section: "The Douglass Summer House, built 1894-95, and located at Highland Beach, Maryland, was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1992." Thanks in advance for your consideration. Ted-- Pubdog ( talk) 12:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
The
November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
15:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your careful consideration at my successful RfA. "always impressed with his work and dedication to Wikipedia" was generous and appreciated. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me. - Dan Dank55 ( send/receive) 20:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Nice work. :-) AdjustShift ( talk) 16:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, the Marble Madness FAC has become a bit stale and I was hoping you could further comment on the article. I replied to your first set of comments and was wondering if you had any other comments (good or bad) and suggestions. ( Guyinblack25 talk 18:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC))
Hi. Could you please delete this image?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:VP_Shopping_Mall.jpg
It's a duplicated image and it is not being used in other pages.
Thanks,
-- 190.90.106.226 ( talk) 21:41, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is my first speedy deletion on wikipedia and I've asked a reconsideration of this. On the put back page was mentioned I should inform you as being the deletor of the article? This request for putting back is a bit new for me. Did I do the right steps or do I have to inform someone else? Hope you can help me out a bit. Kind regards, Outdepth ( talk) 22:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 18:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 00:11, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Why did you transclude GrahamColm to RFA? It's not ready, I haven't yet added my co-nom. See Casliber's talk. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
[1] Just wanted to let you know I've (temporarily) removed your vote because the RfA is not yet transcluded. I'm sure it won't be long - if we just keep it on our watchlists, I'm sure we'll catch it pretty quickly. ;-) Risker ( talk) 18:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I sent you an e-mail, asking you the reason why you deleted the article "luis carlos campos". Would you be so kind to let me know? thanks.
AdjustShift (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for all you help! :)-- MONGO 15:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Nice work. :-) AdjustShift ( talk) 18:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Best wishes, Tom Harrison Talk 14:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes, Hapy New Year!-- MONGO 15:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
I saw your message over here, and left you a response as well. Do you want to collaborate on this? Let me know what your plans are. Cheers, Jake Wartenberg Talk 18:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
The
December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
02:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Long time no see. Hope you've been doing fine. I'm not a copyright expert, so I need your knowledge. Please take a look at this. I may be wrong. It would be grateful if you post an expert's opinion. Thank you. Oda Mari ( talk) 05:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Aude. I'm not sure if you saw, but Washington, D.C. has been nominated for Today's Featured Article, and is likely going to be featured January 20, Inauguration Day. Since you're the only one who actually maintains the article besides myself, I would really appreciate it if you could keep an eye on the article. Just wanted to give you a head up. Thanks, epicAdam( talk) 18:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
This guy is smashing up many articles to do with terrorism - basically erasing any references to 'Al Qaeda'. He doesn't seem to like them being cited anywhere...
Anyway, what he's doing doesn't look right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vexorg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Centonup ( talk • contribs) 14:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Why the deletion?
You deleted my page about the sites eng-tips.com and tek-tips.com. I cited independent sources that referenecd the websites. They are some of the best known user forums in engineering and computing. But they have been deleted three times. I do not know how to start a page in Wikipedia without people deleting it. Can you advise on what I should have included to make it stick? Lgmagone ( talk) 19:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
“ | A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. The source's audience must also be considered; evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability, whereas attention solely by local media is not an indication of notability. | ” |
Could you please explain more fully your decision here? Perhaps I misunderstand the policy on disambiguation pages.
According to my understanding of the policy it is not necessary for an article to exist for it to be listed on a disambiguation page. It is merely necessary for an existing article, that is not a disambiguation page, to have a wikilink under that name. And this condition was satisfied in this case. According to my understanding the tagger lapsed from policy with their speedy deletion request.
If your decision was based on the earlier {{ prod}} may I suggest it was based on a fundamental cultural misunderstanding. It is routine to encounter Afghans who have only a single name. Hamid Karzai's cabinet contained Abdullah Abdullah -- whose real name is just unadorned "Abdullah". About a quarter of the Guantanamo captives from Afghanistan had only a single name -- something that caused great confusion among those with the responsibility to maintain the records there, who came up with several inconsistent, ill-thought-out schemes to shoehorn men with one name into databases that required both a first name and a last name.
I would prefer that the wikipedia learn from the mistakes of others, and not make the mistake of shoehorning individuals to follow the European convention that everyone inherits a surname, when their name does not actually follow that convention.
Cheers! Geo Swan ( talk) 21:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
It looks like you created Use:Aude/Speedydeletions in the article space instead of off of your user page (typo)...unless I'm mistaken. Just an FYI. Cquan ( after the beep...) 07:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Aude, sorry to bother you; I just noticed that you deleted Poker Legends, but it looks like you didn't close the AfD. I would just make the edit myself, but I don't know if it's rude or anything to do that in place of the admin who actually made the decision. Just letting you know, Politizer talk/ contribs 08:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Probably worth a temporary salt. Cheers DFS454 ( talk) 17:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi I have seen you are preparing for delition of this page. I wounder why?? this page is only a technical page about a upcomming movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.159.151.189 ( talk) 17:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
I sorry but I'm a little suprised because there is an offical web site and articles that talks about it in the french salon du cinema 2009 website and a the Paris mome website [ [2]]. plus I was part of the movie so I can tell it existe. we are still in the post production process that is the reason the project is considerised as not released yet. I don't understand was more would be requiered —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buriflex ( talk • contribs) 17:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Can you salt this one? It's been recreated 3 times today. Many thanks -- DFS454 ( talk) 17:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
I am sorry to see that the offical articles comming from a big show in paris like "Salon du cinema de paris" isn't official enough for you. If the articles isn't accurate enough it should be modified not deleted. If you had just googled it you would have seen it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buriflex ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there Aude. I am happy you have taken on speedy deletions, it always needs some more help. And I am quite aware that you are the senior admin to me, so please don't think this as a lecture. I just noticed a couple of pages you deleted and I think you need to be more careful when entering the deletion summary, otherwise people are going to be confused why you deleted their pages citing reasons/criteria that do not apply (for example: ...short strut to the brassy front was not a talk page, File talk:Papyrus.jpg mentions A1 but that's not patent nonsense (and it was not nonsense anyway), For(n)ever where I declined deletion before and which is not implausible, Game Universe contained only an external link and thus was A3 not G11...). We all make mistakes, so no hard feelings I hope, but I think some more care with the deletion summaries would be a good idea. Regards So Why 18:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello aude i would just like to say that by articleevil teacher was not perfect but i was working on it. This was my first wikiedia entry and contry to what you said it was not absolute rubbish please could it be re added i can understand your want to delete inferior articles but this was not rubbish please.
Aude,
Thanks for having the talk page to discuss article inclusion/removal. Recently I created my first Wikipedia entry about a company called ioSafe. You deleted the article after I added a ((hang on)) tag and also created a talk page to improve the quality and content of the article. Now the talk page has been deleted since the original page was deleted.
I want to create the best possible article and have revised the original article to include several independent references, nationally recognized research, data and statistics to better verify and establish the information as valid. I would like your feedback on what I should do next... Is it best to re-create the page with additional content and resources? Thanks for your assistance Harddrives ( talk) 19:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt response and feedback. Appreciate the restoration of the article. I have placed the Source tags into the article per your suggestion and edited the "Disaster Recovery Statistics" content to be more objective. I will gladly edit any additional content and continue to add additional resources. Harddrives ( talk) 19:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Aude,
I was contacted by a friend who was trying her first Wikipedia article for the company Vissumo. She was unsuccessful in getting it posted. I offered to help (though I've only edited a few points in articles in the past) and was blocked by you. If we are doing something wrong please let me know. I believe the four references she listed for the article are legit, but maybe there is some other level of verification she and I do not understand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by G3g3g3g3 ( talk • contribs) 21:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
I poked around online and found another good article that, in addition to the four links provided before (including three very reputable engineering magazines), should suffice the 'multiple' and 'reliable' challenge. Let me know what you think... http://electronicdesign.com/Articles/Index.cfm?AD=1&AD=1&ArticleID=17154 —Preceding unsigned comment added by G3g3g3g3 ( talk • contribs) 20:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your direction and input. We'll keep working to improve the page and the citations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by G3g3g3g3 ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Why did you delete the Scott R. Walterschied page? Wikipedia does not recognize the people that run Hollywood behind the scenes?-- Producer005 ( talk) 01:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Why would you delte the page of Scott Walterschied who is a substantive force in Hollywood when you have pages of Hollywood insiders that are irrelevant in the industry. It's like taking down a Barack Obama page and replacing it with a Rush Limbaugh page. Makes no sense. You should have knowledge of the industry before doing something like that-- Mgraser001 ( talk) 21:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Just to add we have written many article on Scott Walterschied in Variety and the Hollywood Reporter has done the same. I trust you find these news publications as credible.-- Mgraser001 ( talk) 21:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi again! Could you please take a look at Talk:Nori#Possible plagiarism. I think it's possible plagiarism too. Thank you. Oda Mari ( talk) 05:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
I challenge the deletion of my article originally titled 'Hotel Jardim Atlantico Madeira' because the Hotel is of scientific and other interest. It was the first in Iberia (Spain and Portugal) to be awarded the European Eco-label certification the highest environmental Certification available from the European Union. If the regulators of Wikipedia block articles about scientific/environmental awards to businesses this is discrimination against businesses and preventing dissemination of information about businesses that are world-leaders in environmental protection and practices.This is a significant case study for all those studying or who wish to learn about businesses in particular hotels that are world leaders in environmental protection and practices.
Paul Abbiati, wikipedia contributor resident in Madeira
Abbiati ( talk) 16:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to bring your attention to that there is a discussion going on regarding this article with myself and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DFS454 The article was tagged with a Hang On and was not subject to a speedy deletion. Please advice. -- Drewie123 ( talk) 10:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I keep tabs on the On thin ice article and saw that there has been a bit of fishy activity going on at it that I don't fully understand. I'm asking you about it because you were the last person to revert the vandalistic edits of User:Buriflex on the article. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, so I have some questions about what is happening. Did he put the article up for speedy deletion? If so, how can I tell next time (looking at the history doesn't make it too clear until you declined it)? Also, why hasn't this guy been warned for vandalism since his basically blanking the article had to be reverted 2 times on the 19th along with declining the speedy deletion? I just want a bit of advice if you can help! SMSpivey ( talk) 05:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Portal:Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. B ( talk) 03:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
about Jimbo's talk page. Interesting times.-- ragesoss ( talk) 19:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I made the change you suggested, but I'd very much like to see the {{ Imagequote}} template work properly. I'm curious to know if other pages using it also give you problems. Which browser are you using? (I looked at it with IE, Netscape, and Firefox on my Windows XP machine here at school, with no problems. And I use FireFox on my Mac at home, with no problems.) Do you have CSS or JavaScript turned off or some such? Scartol • Tok 18:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
You requested CheckUser on this case, but failed to specify the relevant code letter to justify running a CheckUser. Before a clerk can endorse the case for a CheckUser to process, you need to justify it. Many thanks Mayalld ( talk) 21:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
-- Dravecky ( talk) 08:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hostsfile-entry.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Aude, I think you might be able to help on the talk page of the WTC collapse article. I'm curious to know whether the error can/will be fixed.-- Thomas Basboll ( talk) 22:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
I doon't have any scripting tooools, so I will let you undoo everything. Thanks for the quick bloock and starting the mooves back. -- KP Botany ( talk) 19:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
My RFA passed today at 150/48/6. I wanted to thank you for weighing in on the RFA--I will do everything I can to uphold the policies of this site, and try to make it a better place. All the comments, questions, and in particular the opposes I plan to work on and learn from, so that I can hopefully always do the right thing with the huge trust given to me. rootology ( C)( T) 08:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC) |
Template:911tm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. - Noticed you in one of the template's previous afd's. Sloane ( talk) 16:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
The
January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
03:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I've been reading the criteria for "quality images" and wanted to ask you if this would be eligible? Gracias. APK has a crush on Brandon Stoughton 19:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Sorry I was slow, but I just saw your question and I posted a reply. Let me know if you have some VersionIDs. Cheers, Walkerma ( talk) 15:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Aude, I'm guessing the version selections will be made some time in the next 48 hours. If any are in bad shape, we can manually change the odd versionID afterwards. Walkerma ( talk) 09:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
The
October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
23:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
If you look at User talk:69.132.178.111 and his reply at my own User talk:Shakescene, you can see that Ben Popken now better understands the reaction he got to what he thought was an innocent attempt at helpfulness and seems receptive to any gentle, useful guidance anyone would like to offer. —— Shakescene ( talk) 22:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Never seem to have enough of it anymore...I am very appreciative that you have taken the time to make a few comments about the pallid sturgeon article and will address them before the weekend. IF pallid gets to FA, I will then be able to devote energy to collapse of the WTC article...and I still have a few more details to iron out on the Redwood NP article yet as well to keep it at FA level.-- MONGO 05:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Eagle barnstar is terrific! Thanks! -- Aude ( talk) 04:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Aude. I should be able to look over the article in the next few days. Does that work for you? Best regards, mo talk 02:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the kudos. Go (game) is a well-written article. It helped me better understand the game as well. Unfortunately, I'm horrible at strategy games. :) mo talk 03:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
My apologies for the delay in getting started on the copy edit. I'm working on a previous copy edit request, which is taking longer than I anticipated. I won't be offended if you ask another editor to look over it. mo talk 03:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
You may want to request a copy edit on the Guild of Copy Editors talk page. I'm behind on my current copy edit due to an ANI issue with which I had to deal this weekend. I'll check back with you when I'm finished with this one to find out whether or not the article still needs a copy edit. Thanks for your understanding, mo talk 03:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
I recently started the article Douglass Summer House and would like to add a link from the /* Family life */ section of the Frederick Douglass article to it. I see this is a protected article. I suggest the following sentence be added to the end of the third para of this section: "The Douglass Summer House, built 1894-95, and located at Highland Beach, Maryland, was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1992." Thanks in advance for your consideration. Ted-- Pubdog ( talk) 12:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
The
November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
15:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your careful consideration at my successful RfA. "always impressed with his work and dedication to Wikipedia" was generous and appreciated. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me. - Dan Dank55 ( send/receive) 20:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Nice work. :-) AdjustShift ( talk) 16:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, the Marble Madness FAC has become a bit stale and I was hoping you could further comment on the article. I replied to your first set of comments and was wondering if you had any other comments (good or bad) and suggestions. ( Guyinblack25 talk 18:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC))
Hi. Could you please delete this image?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:VP_Shopping_Mall.jpg
It's a duplicated image and it is not being used in other pages.
Thanks,
-- 190.90.106.226 ( talk) 21:41, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is my first speedy deletion on wikipedia and I've asked a reconsideration of this. On the put back page was mentioned I should inform you as being the deletor of the article? This request for putting back is a bit new for me. Did I do the right steps or do I have to inform someone else? Hope you can help me out a bit. Kind regards, Outdepth ( talk) 22:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 18:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 00:11, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Why did you transclude GrahamColm to RFA? It's not ready, I haven't yet added my co-nom. See Casliber's talk. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
[1] Just wanted to let you know I've (temporarily) removed your vote because the RfA is not yet transcluded. I'm sure it won't be long - if we just keep it on our watchlists, I'm sure we'll catch it pretty quickly. ;-) Risker ( talk) 18:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I sent you an e-mail, asking you the reason why you deleted the article "luis carlos campos". Would you be so kind to let me know? thanks.
AdjustShift (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for all you help! :)-- MONGO 15:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Nice work. :-) AdjustShift ( talk) 18:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Best wishes, Tom Harrison Talk 14:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes, Hapy New Year!-- MONGO 15:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
I saw your message over here, and left you a response as well. Do you want to collaborate on this? Let me know what your plans are. Cheers, Jake Wartenberg Talk 18:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
The
December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
02:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Long time no see. Hope you've been doing fine. I'm not a copyright expert, so I need your knowledge. Please take a look at this. I may be wrong. It would be grateful if you post an expert's opinion. Thank you. Oda Mari ( talk) 05:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Aude. I'm not sure if you saw, but Washington, D.C. has been nominated for Today's Featured Article, and is likely going to be featured January 20, Inauguration Day. Since you're the only one who actually maintains the article besides myself, I would really appreciate it if you could keep an eye on the article. Just wanted to give you a head up. Thanks, epicAdam( talk) 18:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
This guy is smashing up many articles to do with terrorism - basically erasing any references to 'Al Qaeda'. He doesn't seem to like them being cited anywhere...
Anyway, what he's doing doesn't look right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vexorg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Centonup ( talk • contribs) 14:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Why the deletion?
You deleted my page about the sites eng-tips.com and tek-tips.com. I cited independent sources that referenecd the websites. They are some of the best known user forums in engineering and computing. But they have been deleted three times. I do not know how to start a page in Wikipedia without people deleting it. Can you advise on what I should have included to make it stick? Lgmagone ( talk) 19:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
“ | A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. The source's audience must also be considered; evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability, whereas attention solely by local media is not an indication of notability. | ” |
Could you please explain more fully your decision here? Perhaps I misunderstand the policy on disambiguation pages.
According to my understanding of the policy it is not necessary for an article to exist for it to be listed on a disambiguation page. It is merely necessary for an existing article, that is not a disambiguation page, to have a wikilink under that name. And this condition was satisfied in this case. According to my understanding the tagger lapsed from policy with their speedy deletion request.
If your decision was based on the earlier {{ prod}} may I suggest it was based on a fundamental cultural misunderstanding. It is routine to encounter Afghans who have only a single name. Hamid Karzai's cabinet contained Abdullah Abdullah -- whose real name is just unadorned "Abdullah". About a quarter of the Guantanamo captives from Afghanistan had only a single name -- something that caused great confusion among those with the responsibility to maintain the records there, who came up with several inconsistent, ill-thought-out schemes to shoehorn men with one name into databases that required both a first name and a last name.
I would prefer that the wikipedia learn from the mistakes of others, and not make the mistake of shoehorning individuals to follow the European convention that everyone inherits a surname, when their name does not actually follow that convention.
Cheers! Geo Swan ( talk) 21:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
It looks like you created Use:Aude/Speedydeletions in the article space instead of off of your user page (typo)...unless I'm mistaken. Just an FYI. Cquan ( after the beep...) 07:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Aude, sorry to bother you; I just noticed that you deleted Poker Legends, but it looks like you didn't close the AfD. I would just make the edit myself, but I don't know if it's rude or anything to do that in place of the admin who actually made the decision. Just letting you know, Politizer talk/ contribs 08:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Probably worth a temporary salt. Cheers DFS454 ( talk) 17:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi I have seen you are preparing for delition of this page. I wounder why?? this page is only a technical page about a upcomming movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.159.151.189 ( talk) 17:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
I sorry but I'm a little suprised because there is an offical web site and articles that talks about it in the french salon du cinema 2009 website and a the Paris mome website [ [2]]. plus I was part of the movie so I can tell it existe. we are still in the post production process that is the reason the project is considerised as not released yet. I don't understand was more would be requiered —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buriflex ( talk • contribs) 17:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Can you salt this one? It's been recreated 3 times today. Many thanks -- DFS454 ( talk) 17:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
I am sorry to see that the offical articles comming from a big show in paris like "Salon du cinema de paris" isn't official enough for you. If the articles isn't accurate enough it should be modified not deleted. If you had just googled it you would have seen it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buriflex ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there Aude. I am happy you have taken on speedy deletions, it always needs some more help. And I am quite aware that you are the senior admin to me, so please don't think this as a lecture. I just noticed a couple of pages you deleted and I think you need to be more careful when entering the deletion summary, otherwise people are going to be confused why you deleted their pages citing reasons/criteria that do not apply (for example: ...short strut to the brassy front was not a talk page, File talk:Papyrus.jpg mentions A1 but that's not patent nonsense (and it was not nonsense anyway), For(n)ever where I declined deletion before and which is not implausible, Game Universe contained only an external link and thus was A3 not G11...). We all make mistakes, so no hard feelings I hope, but I think some more care with the deletion summaries would be a good idea. Regards So Why 18:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello aude i would just like to say that by articleevil teacher was not perfect but i was working on it. This was my first wikiedia entry and contry to what you said it was not absolute rubbish please could it be re added i can understand your want to delete inferior articles but this was not rubbish please.
Aude,
Thanks for having the talk page to discuss article inclusion/removal. Recently I created my first Wikipedia entry about a company called ioSafe. You deleted the article after I added a ((hang on)) tag and also created a talk page to improve the quality and content of the article. Now the talk page has been deleted since the original page was deleted.
I want to create the best possible article and have revised the original article to include several independent references, nationally recognized research, data and statistics to better verify and establish the information as valid. I would like your feedback on what I should do next... Is it best to re-create the page with additional content and resources? Thanks for your assistance Harddrives ( talk) 19:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt response and feedback. Appreciate the restoration of the article. I have placed the Source tags into the article per your suggestion and edited the "Disaster Recovery Statistics" content to be more objective. I will gladly edit any additional content and continue to add additional resources. Harddrives ( talk) 19:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Aude,
I was contacted by a friend who was trying her first Wikipedia article for the company Vissumo. She was unsuccessful in getting it posted. I offered to help (though I've only edited a few points in articles in the past) and was blocked by you. If we are doing something wrong please let me know. I believe the four references she listed for the article are legit, but maybe there is some other level of verification she and I do not understand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by G3g3g3g3 ( talk • contribs) 21:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
I poked around online and found another good article that, in addition to the four links provided before (including three very reputable engineering magazines), should suffice the 'multiple' and 'reliable' challenge. Let me know what you think... http://electronicdesign.com/Articles/Index.cfm?AD=1&AD=1&ArticleID=17154 —Preceding unsigned comment added by G3g3g3g3 ( talk • contribs) 20:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your direction and input. We'll keep working to improve the page and the citations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by G3g3g3g3 ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Why did you delete the Scott R. Walterschied page? Wikipedia does not recognize the people that run Hollywood behind the scenes?-- Producer005 ( talk) 01:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Why would you delte the page of Scott Walterschied who is a substantive force in Hollywood when you have pages of Hollywood insiders that are irrelevant in the industry. It's like taking down a Barack Obama page and replacing it with a Rush Limbaugh page. Makes no sense. You should have knowledge of the industry before doing something like that-- Mgraser001 ( talk) 21:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Just to add we have written many article on Scott Walterschied in Variety and the Hollywood Reporter has done the same. I trust you find these news publications as credible.-- Mgraser001 ( talk) 21:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi again! Could you please take a look at Talk:Nori#Possible plagiarism. I think it's possible plagiarism too. Thank you. Oda Mari ( talk) 05:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
I challenge the deletion of my article originally titled 'Hotel Jardim Atlantico Madeira' because the Hotel is of scientific and other interest. It was the first in Iberia (Spain and Portugal) to be awarded the European Eco-label certification the highest environmental Certification available from the European Union. If the regulators of Wikipedia block articles about scientific/environmental awards to businesses this is discrimination against businesses and preventing dissemination of information about businesses that are world-leaders in environmental protection and practices.This is a significant case study for all those studying or who wish to learn about businesses in particular hotels that are world leaders in environmental protection and practices.
Paul Abbiati, wikipedia contributor resident in Madeira
Abbiati ( talk) 16:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to bring your attention to that there is a discussion going on regarding this article with myself and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DFS454 The article was tagged with a Hang On and was not subject to a speedy deletion. Please advice. -- Drewie123 ( talk) 10:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I keep tabs on the On thin ice article and saw that there has been a bit of fishy activity going on at it that I don't fully understand. I'm asking you about it because you were the last person to revert the vandalistic edits of User:Buriflex on the article. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, so I have some questions about what is happening. Did he put the article up for speedy deletion? If so, how can I tell next time (looking at the history doesn't make it too clear until you declined it)? Also, why hasn't this guy been warned for vandalism since his basically blanking the article had to be reverted 2 times on the 19th along with declining the speedy deletion? I just want a bit of advice if you can help! SMSpivey ( talk) 05:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Portal:Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. B ( talk) 03:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
about Jimbo's talk page. Interesting times.-- ragesoss ( talk) 19:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I made the change you suggested, but I'd very much like to see the {{ Imagequote}} template work properly. I'm curious to know if other pages using it also give you problems. Which browser are you using? (I looked at it with IE, Netscape, and Firefox on my Windows XP machine here at school, with no problems. And I use FireFox on my Mac at home, with no problems.) Do you have CSS or JavaScript turned off or some such? Scartol • Tok 18:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
You requested CheckUser on this case, but failed to specify the relevant code letter to justify running a CheckUser. Before a clerk can endorse the case for a CheckUser to process, you need to justify it. Many thanks Mayalld ( talk) 21:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
-- Dravecky ( talk) 08:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hostsfile-entry.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Aude, I think you might be able to help on the talk page of the WTC collapse article. I'm curious to know whether the error can/will be fixed.-- Thomas Basboll ( talk) 22:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
I doon't have any scripting tooools, so I will let you undoo everything. Thanks for the quick bloock and starting the mooves back. -- KP Botany ( talk) 19:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
My RFA passed today at 150/48/6. I wanted to thank you for weighing in on the RFA--I will do everything I can to uphold the policies of this site, and try to make it a better place. All the comments, questions, and in particular the opposes I plan to work on and learn from, so that I can hopefully always do the right thing with the huge trust given to me. rootology ( C)( T) 08:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC) |
Template:911tm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. - Noticed you in one of the template's previous afd's. Sloane ( talk) 16:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
The
January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
03:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I've been reading the criteria for "quality images" and wanted to ask you if this would be eligible? Gracias. APK has a crush on Brandon Stoughton 19:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)