![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Hi Atsme, long time no talk. I hope you are well. I was working on the horse articles contained in the article American Quarter Horse Hall of Fame making edits like fixing broken links or correcting where bots had put in archive links and changing them to live links that had just been reorganized, and some other edits. For a complete list, see my talk page under the heading QHs. I also took the time to add each article that was missing to your category Category:AQHA Hall of Fame (horses). The category only had about 12 members in it when I started. It now includes all of the articles from the aforementioned hall of fame article and numbers 87 members. It should be a much more useful category now.
I also just completed an expansion of a horse article Make It Do, who is both an AQUA Hall of Fame member and a ProRodeo Hall of Fame member, where he was known as Peanuts. In looking for a particular source for one of his rodeo hall of fame induction pages (which I never found), I came across this really interesting article in "Racing - The American Quarter Horse Racing Journal" entitled "All Around Hand" which is about the horse's owner who trained him for racing. Stan Immenschuh is a very interesting person although there is not a lot about him on the Internet. Apparently, he was a cowboy who also trained race horses and cutting horses, could rodeo himself and was a friend and associate of Bubba Cascio. I just thought you might like to read the article or even might have uses for it as a source. Unfortunately, I could not find anything that makes him notable himself, but still very interesting. If you haven't already seen it, that is. There is an article about him on AQHA's web site too. But it is mostly just a repeat about what he said regarding Peanuts. Article: [1] Also, this short obit adds a bit more about his abilities: [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawnleelynn ( talk • contribs) 19:50 8 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dina Powell. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Volunteer Marek
13:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Only thing anyone is sick of is your PAs, Specifico. My history with you has not been a pleasant one, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. As you well know, I have no affinity for advocacies, POV pushers, or liars. All you have done is dangle bait in front of me, hoping I'd take it. Sorry to disappoint, but I'm not a newbie anymore, so move along...your rudeness is not welcome here. Atsme 📞 📧 19:53, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, wondering why you changed the content of Mechanical Battery to redirect to the Battery disambig. I don't think this is appropriate, since most of the content of that page has nothing to do with mechanical batteries. If anything, I'd think that the sublinks under "A mechanical battery, storing energy by mechanical means" on that disambig page should be removed in favor of linking to the Mechanical Battery page. Fresheneesz ( talk) 20:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Greetings. I have reverted your addition of the {{
POV}} template to the article
Linda Sarsour. if you have identified a serious breach of neutrality in the article, then feel free to re-add the template, but please leave a note on the talk page clearly explaining the problem. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
15:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your input at
Talk:Linda Sarsour. Good-faith contributions are welcome; however, you may have better luck persuading others if you don't label their remarks "nonsense"
[3] or accuse them of "disruptive" behavior when they challenge you.
[4] Labeling the work of other contributors "whitewashing"
[5] is also unlikely to win you many converts. You are a new contributor to this page; I would respectfully suggest that you study the previous discussions before demanding that things be done your way. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
11:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/?/2017 Advisory RFC. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Accuracy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Accuracy and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Wikipedia:WikiProject Accuracy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)
06:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dismissal of James Comey. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The autoconfirmed trial is in effect!! Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed_article_creation_trial Atsme 📞 📧 02:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
I'm new at this WikiLove thing. So excuse any mistakes.
Anyway, I would like to show my appreciation for your wonderful photos and the lovely captions under each on your profile. They brightened up my morning. Raghuvarv ( talk) 03:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Atsme, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh 666 20:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi you left a message "discuss on TP of Homeopathy before reverting redirect again" May I know what is 'TP'? Dr Kurian John Poruthukaren— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drpjkurian ( talk • contribs) 17:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The answer to this riddle is scent, cent, & sent. Atsme 📞 📧 00:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Atsme: |
The article Chris Sherwin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG, and WP:PROF. After stripping away every article and citation associated with the subject, essentially nothing is left.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
19:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Sherwin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Sherwin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Atsme, regarding your "amusing" misspelling of a living person's name here, I've removed it. Please have a read of WP:BLP and consider that everybody's entitled to a little human dignity here. Bishonen | talk 20:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC).
Hi Atsme, that was a really nice tribute you wrote for DrChrissy. Thank you for doing it. SarahSV (talk) 04:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
This volunteer roll call is sent to you because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at
dispute resolution noticeboard. If you are still interested in assisting at DRN and are willing to do so by either handling at least one case per month, or by helping at administrative and coordination tasks on monthly (at least) basis, please add your username
here. Volunteers who do not add their username on the
roll call list will be removed from the volunteers list after November 15, 2017 unless it is chosen to have them retained for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. In case you are removed from the volunteers list, you may re-add your username at any time. However please do so only if you can and are willing to participate as described above.
Either ways, I would like to thank you for your participation and assistance at DRN so far, and wish that you will continue contributing to the encyclopedia and assisting when available.
The DRN coordinator,
Kostas20142
(talk)
15:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
I have posted a proposal on the BLP talk page and would appreciate you looking at the proposal I have made. I would value your input as although I usually don't agree with quite a lot of what you say and you probably think I'm a bit of a moron, I think you are quite well versed on policy and are also appropriately sensitive to the meanings of words, and in particular accusatory terminology. I should make it clear that I have no idea whether or not you would support the proposal and lean toward thinking that you would reject it on the grounds that you find me about as amusing as a pantomime clown dancing at a funeral dirge. I hope to raise support for it though, as it upholds a level of clarity which I think is necessary in order to fully adhere to BLPCRIME references. Edaham ( talk) 11:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Is here. It's also right at the top of the hat you keep removing, all you had to do was click the link. Fyddlestix ( talk) 03:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
I finished if youre interested. -- 94.246.150.68 ( talk) 01:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct of Mister Wiki editors. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct of Mister Wiki editors/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 15, 2017, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct of Mister Wiki editors/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kostas20142 ( talk) 21:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates from Dispute resolution noticeboard
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from
the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. All Wikipedia editors are welcome to opt in to the list, or to
join DRN as a volunteer
Sent on behalf of
Kostas20142 by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
11:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Atsme ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Requesting an IP address block exemption, because I am at an event out of state and my iPad IP address has fallen into an area that is blocked for another week. I will be in this location for 2 weeks and need to use my iPad to edit because it has a real keyboard while my cell phone is a horrible little device for such use. Atsme 📞 📧 17:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I didn't actually unblock the hardblock, I just gave you WP:IPBE for a week. Per my rationale on Ritchie's talk page. Floquenbeam ( talk) 18:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The block is this one. I believe Drmies and Opabinia regalis have checkuser access so they may be able to review it? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Well I just wrote Draft:Daughter of Tintagel and it seems the backlog is huge, so maybe review it or whatever is needed to make it a real article. -- 94.246.150.68 ( talk) 03:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
As for an illustration I think https://i.imgur.com/FTGPn9S.png would be nice. -- 94.246.150.68 ( talk) 04:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Atsme, I saw your AE statement and can see two problems with it. First of all, such edit can not be reasonably viewed as a topic ban violation by another contributor. You can't reasonably argue that editing anything related to any politician who has been endorsed by D.Trump was a topic ban violation with respect to D.Trump. Second, and more important, the request was about you. Do you think that if someone else violated his restriction, that excuses you? Saying that, I think the editing restriction you apparently violated is unhelpful and should not be used... My very best wishes ( talk) 22:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Atsme, I wasn't comfortable posting this anywhere else, but I'd like you to know what I see when I evaluate your edits... Particularly since you requested diffs showing problematic behavior, and I believe honest criticism can be a starting place for self-awareness and improvement. You have accused VM (and others) of hounding you, discussed him rudely after failing to notify him on an admin's talk page, and accused him and others of OWN (again without notifying him or anyone else). I went back farther in your editing history, and it just goes on and on. You repeat the behavior with others, alternating between playing the victim and what reads like outright tedentious editing. Your edits seem to gaslight your colleagues, accusing them (whether incorrectly or correctly) of behavior that your edits also commit and essentially shutting down discussion as a result. You appear to harass editors who have told you to stay away from their talk pages, and then run to an admin's talk page to apparently block shop after you were rightly accused of canvassing (and again fail to notify anyone). You exhibit general NOTHERE behavior when you argue that our job is to "not piss off readers" who are fans of certain media celebrities rather than report what RS say about those celebrities. You further demonstrate NOTHERE behavior when you beg the question "Has WMF experienced any decrease in monetary contributions based on en.WP's political slant or is everything still on track?" on Jimbo's page and then ask "How can we make these stats work for us?" when the data paints a different picture than the one you wanted to see. You miscite policy constantly Wikilawyering to a degree that shuts down discussion, discourages participation heavily, or the other party simply asks you to leave.
I also saw plenty of constructive edits where you put your experience and expertise to good use, but most of them were outside of AP2. I hope you take this as intended, and at least take a look at the tone of your editing to reflect on how your fellow volunteers might interpret it. It's entirely possible something is just getting lost in translation, and fixing it starts with honest reflection. 207.222.59.50 ( talk) 20:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Atop your talk page:
"Oh my! I just realized that I am biased...in favor of WP:NPOV, WP:V and WP:NOR"
Sound like you're being sarcastic, eh? Ha ha!
H A P P Y H A L L O W E E N ! ! ! North America 1000 16:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Atsme:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
Halloween!
– –
Davey2010
Talk
13:38, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
::Hahahaha here you are
, Hahahaha sorry to be a party pooper but I don't really celebrate it - I just stay at home
,
Ah well Happy Halloween :)
–
Davey2010
Talk
15:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
I think the pink-tinted saying at the top of your talk page is the best advice about paid editing ever! -- Tryptofish ( talk) 15:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Are you an expert photoshopper? I am looking to alter this file to make it appropriate for this year's WikiCup winner, ie. with a different username, year and flag. Any chance you could help? Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Ok, Cwmhiraeth, will this work? The user name is longer, so had to make some width adjustments. Atsme 📞 📧 20:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
The instructions are at WP:SPI and cover most of the points I made on my Talk page. Remember, just include the master and that one IP and don't request a CU. Here is your previous (now deleted) statement, which you'll have to tailor a bit:
-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Atsme! We finally have some progress on the GA review. Could you help me out a tiny bit with one of the reviewer's questions? See Talk:Charmayne James. They have said the following about the Career earnings section.
"This section looks like an indiscriminate list to me, unless you could explain how this is relevant."
I'd like to add content to describe the list as accurately as possible in the correct ProRodeo terminology. Who better to do that? I am not sure how to explain it between the NFR and the WPRA involvement, or if that matters.
This is exciting it's here as it's my first one...Thanks again for getting me here! :) dawnleelynn (talk) 22:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
About your RfC: You were prevented by WP:Neutrality from putting your argument ("if the president says something, that means it isn't classified") into the questions themselves. That's as it should be. But that doesn't stop you from putting your argument into the discussion section. Without that explanation, it isn't even really clear what you are asking or why. Explain it in the the discussion section, as briefly and pointedly as you can. Note: This suggestion is made in pure good will and because I actually do want people to understand, and evaluate, the point you are trying to make. See you there. -- MelanieN ( talk) 03:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
So I really do not know why you did it ...? Tour Was it just published, and there are no more dates than these. I'll soon add a picture. I very closely follow the work of Lepa Brena, I am her fan. So I think it's really not right to register a page for deletion. Brena will soon release a new album, so this whole story will expand as well as the tour of course. I'm asking you to delete this request to delete the page, because there is no reason to do so. thank you. Maja Polovina ( talk) 16:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
There was a problem with the formatting of the nomination for deletion. I have fixed the problem; you can find the new version of the nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSA Tour (2nd nomination). -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Hi Atsme, long time no talk. I hope you are well. I was working on the horse articles contained in the article American Quarter Horse Hall of Fame making edits like fixing broken links or correcting where bots had put in archive links and changing them to live links that had just been reorganized, and some other edits. For a complete list, see my talk page under the heading QHs. I also took the time to add each article that was missing to your category Category:AQHA Hall of Fame (horses). The category only had about 12 members in it when I started. It now includes all of the articles from the aforementioned hall of fame article and numbers 87 members. It should be a much more useful category now.
I also just completed an expansion of a horse article Make It Do, who is both an AQUA Hall of Fame member and a ProRodeo Hall of Fame member, where he was known as Peanuts. In looking for a particular source for one of his rodeo hall of fame induction pages (which I never found), I came across this really interesting article in "Racing - The American Quarter Horse Racing Journal" entitled "All Around Hand" which is about the horse's owner who trained him for racing. Stan Immenschuh is a very interesting person although there is not a lot about him on the Internet. Apparently, he was a cowboy who also trained race horses and cutting horses, could rodeo himself and was a friend and associate of Bubba Cascio. I just thought you might like to read the article or even might have uses for it as a source. Unfortunately, I could not find anything that makes him notable himself, but still very interesting. If you haven't already seen it, that is. There is an article about him on AQHA's web site too. But it is mostly just a repeat about what he said regarding Peanuts. Article: [1] Also, this short obit adds a bit more about his abilities: [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawnleelynn ( talk • contribs) 19:50 8 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dina Powell. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Volunteer Marek
13:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Only thing anyone is sick of is your PAs, Specifico. My history with you has not been a pleasant one, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. As you well know, I have no affinity for advocacies, POV pushers, or liars. All you have done is dangle bait in front of me, hoping I'd take it. Sorry to disappoint, but I'm not a newbie anymore, so move along...your rudeness is not welcome here. Atsme 📞 📧 19:53, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, wondering why you changed the content of Mechanical Battery to redirect to the Battery disambig. I don't think this is appropriate, since most of the content of that page has nothing to do with mechanical batteries. If anything, I'd think that the sublinks under "A mechanical battery, storing energy by mechanical means" on that disambig page should be removed in favor of linking to the Mechanical Battery page. Fresheneesz ( talk) 20:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Greetings. I have reverted your addition of the {{
POV}} template to the article
Linda Sarsour. if you have identified a serious breach of neutrality in the article, then feel free to re-add the template, but please leave a note on the talk page clearly explaining the problem. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
15:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your input at
Talk:Linda Sarsour. Good-faith contributions are welcome; however, you may have better luck persuading others if you don't label their remarks "nonsense"
[3] or accuse them of "disruptive" behavior when they challenge you.
[4] Labeling the work of other contributors "whitewashing"
[5] is also unlikely to win you many converts. You are a new contributor to this page; I would respectfully suggest that you study the previous discussions before demanding that things be done your way. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
11:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/?/2017 Advisory RFC. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Accuracy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Accuracy and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Wikipedia:WikiProject Accuracy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)
06:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dismissal of James Comey. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The autoconfirmed trial is in effect!! Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed_article_creation_trial Atsme 📞 📧 02:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
I'm new at this WikiLove thing. So excuse any mistakes.
Anyway, I would like to show my appreciation for your wonderful photos and the lovely captions under each on your profile. They brightened up my morning. Raghuvarv ( talk) 03:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Atsme, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh 666 20:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi you left a message "discuss on TP of Homeopathy before reverting redirect again" May I know what is 'TP'? Dr Kurian John Poruthukaren— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drpjkurian ( talk • contribs) 17:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The answer to this riddle is scent, cent, & sent. Atsme 📞 📧 00:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Atsme: |
The article Chris Sherwin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG, and WP:PROF. After stripping away every article and citation associated with the subject, essentially nothing is left.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
19:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Sherwin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Sherwin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Atsme, regarding your "amusing" misspelling of a living person's name here, I've removed it. Please have a read of WP:BLP and consider that everybody's entitled to a little human dignity here. Bishonen | talk 20:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC).
Hi Atsme, that was a really nice tribute you wrote for DrChrissy. Thank you for doing it. SarahSV (talk) 04:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
This volunteer roll call is sent to you because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at
dispute resolution noticeboard. If you are still interested in assisting at DRN and are willing to do so by either handling at least one case per month, or by helping at administrative and coordination tasks on monthly (at least) basis, please add your username
here. Volunteers who do not add their username on the
roll call list will be removed from the volunteers list after November 15, 2017 unless it is chosen to have them retained for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. In case you are removed from the volunteers list, you may re-add your username at any time. However please do so only if you can and are willing to participate as described above.
Either ways, I would like to thank you for your participation and assistance at DRN so far, and wish that you will continue contributing to the encyclopedia and assisting when available.
The DRN coordinator,
Kostas20142
(talk)
15:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
I have posted a proposal on the BLP talk page and would appreciate you looking at the proposal I have made. I would value your input as although I usually don't agree with quite a lot of what you say and you probably think I'm a bit of a moron, I think you are quite well versed on policy and are also appropriately sensitive to the meanings of words, and in particular accusatory terminology. I should make it clear that I have no idea whether or not you would support the proposal and lean toward thinking that you would reject it on the grounds that you find me about as amusing as a pantomime clown dancing at a funeral dirge. I hope to raise support for it though, as it upholds a level of clarity which I think is necessary in order to fully adhere to BLPCRIME references. Edaham ( talk) 11:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Is here. It's also right at the top of the hat you keep removing, all you had to do was click the link. Fyddlestix ( talk) 03:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
I finished if youre interested. -- 94.246.150.68 ( talk) 01:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct of Mister Wiki editors. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct of Mister Wiki editors/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 15, 2017, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct of Mister Wiki editors/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kostas20142 ( talk) 21:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates from Dispute resolution noticeboard
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from
the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. All Wikipedia editors are welcome to opt in to the list, or to
join DRN as a volunteer
Sent on behalf of
Kostas20142 by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
11:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Atsme ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Requesting an IP address block exemption, because I am at an event out of state and my iPad IP address has fallen into an area that is blocked for another week. I will be in this location for 2 weeks and need to use my iPad to edit because it has a real keyboard while my cell phone is a horrible little device for such use. Atsme 📞 📧 17:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I didn't actually unblock the hardblock, I just gave you WP:IPBE for a week. Per my rationale on Ritchie's talk page. Floquenbeam ( talk) 18:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The block is this one. I believe Drmies and Opabinia regalis have checkuser access so they may be able to review it? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Well I just wrote Draft:Daughter of Tintagel and it seems the backlog is huge, so maybe review it or whatever is needed to make it a real article. -- 94.246.150.68 ( talk) 03:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
As for an illustration I think https://i.imgur.com/FTGPn9S.png would be nice. -- 94.246.150.68 ( talk) 04:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Atsme, I saw your AE statement and can see two problems with it. First of all, such edit can not be reasonably viewed as a topic ban violation by another contributor. You can't reasonably argue that editing anything related to any politician who has been endorsed by D.Trump was a topic ban violation with respect to D.Trump. Second, and more important, the request was about you. Do you think that if someone else violated his restriction, that excuses you? Saying that, I think the editing restriction you apparently violated is unhelpful and should not be used... My very best wishes ( talk) 22:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Atsme, I wasn't comfortable posting this anywhere else, but I'd like you to know what I see when I evaluate your edits... Particularly since you requested diffs showing problematic behavior, and I believe honest criticism can be a starting place for self-awareness and improvement. You have accused VM (and others) of hounding you, discussed him rudely after failing to notify him on an admin's talk page, and accused him and others of OWN (again without notifying him or anyone else). I went back farther in your editing history, and it just goes on and on. You repeat the behavior with others, alternating between playing the victim and what reads like outright tedentious editing. Your edits seem to gaslight your colleagues, accusing them (whether incorrectly or correctly) of behavior that your edits also commit and essentially shutting down discussion as a result. You appear to harass editors who have told you to stay away from their talk pages, and then run to an admin's talk page to apparently block shop after you were rightly accused of canvassing (and again fail to notify anyone). You exhibit general NOTHERE behavior when you argue that our job is to "not piss off readers" who are fans of certain media celebrities rather than report what RS say about those celebrities. You further demonstrate NOTHERE behavior when you beg the question "Has WMF experienced any decrease in monetary contributions based on en.WP's political slant or is everything still on track?" on Jimbo's page and then ask "How can we make these stats work for us?" when the data paints a different picture than the one you wanted to see. You miscite policy constantly Wikilawyering to a degree that shuts down discussion, discourages participation heavily, or the other party simply asks you to leave.
I also saw plenty of constructive edits where you put your experience and expertise to good use, but most of them were outside of AP2. I hope you take this as intended, and at least take a look at the tone of your editing to reflect on how your fellow volunteers might interpret it. It's entirely possible something is just getting lost in translation, and fixing it starts with honest reflection. 207.222.59.50 ( talk) 20:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Atop your talk page:
"Oh my! I just realized that I am biased...in favor of WP:NPOV, WP:V and WP:NOR"
Sound like you're being sarcastic, eh? Ha ha!
H A P P Y H A L L O W E E N ! ! ! North America 1000 16:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Atsme:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
Halloween!
– –
Davey2010
Talk
13:38, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
::Hahahaha here you are
, Hahahaha sorry to be a party pooper but I don't really celebrate it - I just stay at home
,
Ah well Happy Halloween :)
–
Davey2010
Talk
15:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
I think the pink-tinted saying at the top of your talk page is the best advice about paid editing ever! -- Tryptofish ( talk) 15:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Are you an expert photoshopper? I am looking to alter this file to make it appropriate for this year's WikiCup winner, ie. with a different username, year and flag. Any chance you could help? Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Ok, Cwmhiraeth, will this work? The user name is longer, so had to make some width adjustments. Atsme 📞 📧 20:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
The instructions are at WP:SPI and cover most of the points I made on my Talk page. Remember, just include the master and that one IP and don't request a CU. Here is your previous (now deleted) statement, which you'll have to tailor a bit:
-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Atsme! We finally have some progress on the GA review. Could you help me out a tiny bit with one of the reviewer's questions? See Talk:Charmayne James. They have said the following about the Career earnings section.
"This section looks like an indiscriminate list to me, unless you could explain how this is relevant."
I'd like to add content to describe the list as accurately as possible in the correct ProRodeo terminology. Who better to do that? I am not sure how to explain it between the NFR and the WPRA involvement, or if that matters.
This is exciting it's here as it's my first one...Thanks again for getting me here! :) dawnleelynn (talk) 22:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
About your RfC: You were prevented by WP:Neutrality from putting your argument ("if the president says something, that means it isn't classified") into the questions themselves. That's as it should be. But that doesn't stop you from putting your argument into the discussion section. Without that explanation, it isn't even really clear what you are asking or why. Explain it in the the discussion section, as briefly and pointedly as you can. Note: This suggestion is made in pure good will and because I actually do want people to understand, and evaluate, the point you are trying to make. See you there. -- MelanieN ( talk) 03:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
So I really do not know why you did it ...? Tour Was it just published, and there are no more dates than these. I'll soon add a picture. I very closely follow the work of Lepa Brena, I am her fan. So I think it's really not right to register a page for deletion. Brena will soon release a new album, so this whole story will expand as well as the tour of course. I'm asking you to delete this request to delete the page, because there is no reason to do so. thank you. Maja Polovina ( talk) 16:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
There was a problem with the formatting of the nomination for deletion. I have fixed the problem; you can find the new version of the nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSA Tour (2nd nomination). -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC)