![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome! dear visitor..............
Hello, Ashleythomas80 , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Sorry, I am a bit late but welcome all the same. --
P.K.Niyogi
15:37, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Nedumpally#Irrelevant_information for my concerns about the article Nedumpally. I'm not vandalizing the article or trying to be critical of the community. It's simply that the article is not in a good shape according to the Wikipedia guidelines. Keeping the information relevant and sourcing it rigorously is important to make the page a good article. utcursch | talk 14:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Dear Ashleypt,
I have wikified some of the passages that were added in the light of the dispute resolution responses. This is not edit war. I just wanted to let you know that. Much of what you wrote is there and I have wikified passages as per neutrality of dispute resolution. thanks Robin klein ( talk) 13:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Dear Ashleypt,
I have changed Aryan-Brahmin, Dravidian, Jains etc as local people and Jews and Arabs as West Asian semitic. I have not mentioned any particular community. I have used broad terms that encompasses these peoples. I have not been partisan. The accusation is fallacious. thanks Robin klein ( talk) 15:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
You are vandalising the syrian malabar nasrani page by inserting texts into references and removing citations. Please stop this. Robin klein ( talk) 14:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ashleypt, this is just to say that I have been following the reverts at Syrian Malabar Nasrani over the last two days, and it looks like you are in a slow edit war with Robin klein. You really need to talk out the changes on the talk page before you revert, otherwise it might result in you being blocked. Although WP:3RR is a bright-line rule, it is not a lower limit - slow edit warring can also result in a block. I recommended that you take this to the Mediation Cabal in my thread on the dispute resolution noticeboard, and I still think that would be the best idea; if you don't want to do this, though, you can try another form of dispute resolution, such as an RfC. Whatever you choose, you can't simply keep reverting without discussing the article contents at all. Although my role at the DRN is usually a peaceful one, if the edit warring on this page continues for much longer, I am thinking of reporting you both to WP:AN3 in an effort to start some useful dialogue. Regards — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 13:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Dear Ashleypt,
I agree that the interpretation of the Nasrani symbol with the Jewish menorah is contentious. I shall modify it to remove the pov. However I should add that even the interpretation of the Nasrani symbol as christianity coming to land of Buddha is very contentious and a very recent one and equally questionable. After all these are interpretations not ascribed definitions. thanks Robin klein ( talk) 19:38, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Syrian Malabar Nasrani , has been proposed for a
merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going
here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Cúchullain
t/
c
14:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Support: The name Syrian Malabar Nasrani is vague, especially for a non-Malayalee. The word Syrian is misleading; the word Malabar is an anachronism and the word Nasrani is unfamiliar to many. Wikipedia articles are read by people all over the world. But the name Saint Thomas Christians (not St. Thomas Christians) is specific and more suitable for a worldwide publication. So, I support the merger. Neduvelilmathew ( talk) 18:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ashley Thomas,
You have added the name of Padma Bhushan K.J. Jesudas in the list of Syrian Malabar Nasrani. Are you sure he is a Syrian Christian? His wife Prabha is. Neduvelilmathew ( talk) 18:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Stthomas_cross.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sreejith K ( talk) 13:37, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Stthomas cross.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Ashley, please do remember to log in when making edits. It allows others to follow who's saying and doing what. Thanks,-- Cúchullain t/ c 17:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, are you able to help fix the recent IP addition to Bible translations into Malayalam? The style, formatting and English is problematic, but it looks as if it contains some valuable content. Can you help? In ictu oculi ( talk) 10:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Saint Thomas Christians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Joseph ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
I notice that you have added two responses at Talk:Caste system in Kerala. Those responses were to comments made as long ago as July 2010. Is there really any benefit in continuing something that has lain dormant for as long as this? I think that you would be better starting a new thread for such things as, among other issues, the chances are not particularly great that the people who originated those old discussions are still around. You could always refer to the earlier discussion in your new one. - Sitush ( talk) 09:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you really do seem to be on a mission to mention Syrian Christians in as many tangential articles as possible. Are you confident that you do not have a conflict of interest? Your latest edit, at Caste system in India, specifically says that they were not in the system ... so why are you mentioning them at all? It seems daft to me. Peru is not in Europe but we don't say that in the Europe article. - Sitush ( talk) 13:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
If you have not got it and would like to see it then be quick! - Sitush ( talk) 14:18, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Regarding your "myth" query, that is really one that you should ask on the relevant talk page. But my response would be "yes, it does", and it goes on to explain that there is more than one theory. Actually, I would like to expand on that in the article. - Sitush ( talk) 01:13, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
This edit is a borderline attack and a certain breach of WP:AGF. Just because sometimes you do not get your own way, does not mean that those who thought otherwise have an agenda - political or otherwise - or that they were acting in bad faith. The fact is that a lot of what you say in discussions has some merit but you are not getting to grips with issues such as weight and there really does seem at times to be a problem with comprehension. I have no idea whether or not English is your first language but you certainly seem to be very capable in both reading and writing it when it suits, so perhaps you are just losing things in the heat of the moment. If that is the case, and I could be wrong, then it might be worthwhile you remembering that Wikipedia is timeless - there is rarely any need to rush to add or delete content from articles, aside from in situations where there are copyright violations or violations of policies such as WP:BLP.
You have made several assumptions of bad faith etc recently, along the lines of the one that I have referred to above. Should it happen again any time soon then I will be issuing a more formal warning. You are dealing with some experienced editors for whom such comments are wateIr off a duck's back, but such comments set a bad example and they engender an atmosphere of non-cooperation, which is exactly what Wikipedia needs to avoid if it is to progress. - Sitush ( talk) 16:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stthomas cross.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor ( talk) 04:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Please log in to make comments, otherwise we don't know you had anything to do with uploading the image. ww2censor ( talk) 14:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Have you seen this comment? - Sitush ( talk) 07:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Shrike ( talk) 19:58, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Two notes, as the protecting admin. First, as Sitush describes above, copyright violations cannot appear in Wikipedia for any length of time--that is, you cannot add a copyright violation, then say that you're going to fix it in future edits. You need to do all of the "fixing" in the edit window before submitting, or work on it off Wiki first then bring it here. That being said, the truth is that you can't fix copyright violations that way anyway. That is, you can't take text someone already wrote and then edit it (by changing words or grammar here and there). Instead, you need to completely rewrite the info, summarizing the key points, from the ground up. The line between "summary", "close paraphrasing", "plagiarism", and "copyright violation" is very difficult to negotiate, but in my experience (as both a WP editor and an English teacher) is that the worst approach is to start with a copy of the text and then make incremental changes. Instead, read the entire text, figure out what the important information is, then write that in your own words. Of course, your final product still has to match the information in the original, but it needs to have entirely novel phrasing. Second, note that though I protected Nambudiri after you had edited it, that is in no way an endorsement of the most recent version. You now need to go to the article's talk page and discuss the issues between you and Sitush. He has clearly been trying to talk to you here, but I don't really see that you've been doing that, except to place some warnings on his talk page that don't even make sense. If you do not engage in discussions, and instead return to reverting on that article after the protection expires, instead of protection, next time an admin will just block you instead. Wikipedia works by collaboration, not by fighting. Qwyrxian ( talk) 23:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Shrike ( talk) 15:34, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
I realise that you must think that I am hounding you but, in fact, I am merely trying to sort out problems with your edits. I've no idea exactly what is going on with your sourcing but inserting a sourced statement at Saint Thomas Christians (relating to the forward caste/12 per cent issue) when it seems that the source did not support the statement was unfortunate. Worse, you then reinstated the statement an hour or so later, using a different source. I raised some points about that second source (Sivanandan) in this thread, including that I could not find where it supported the statement. You responded to that thread here but ignored my query regarding the source. Then I find that you have just requested it at WP:RX. The implication is that you used a source that you had not in fact consulted.
Now, we have had a similar implication discussed at Talk:Caste system in Kerala#Journal of Kerala Studies and there have also been other incidents relating to sourcing and to cherrypicking etc.
Mistakes will happen but I am becoming very concerned about your methods and this is one of the reasons why I am having to check pretty much every source that you cite. Sorry about this, but there is a need for care. Sloppy editing, such as I fixed in this series of edits, is usually quite easy to spot and resolve but citation errors are both more critical and often more difficult to spot. Someone has to do it. - Sitush ( talk) 16:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
I am afraid you appear to be going backwards at the moment, and I really would advise that you read in full some of our basic policies, such as WP:V and WP:RS. A read of WP:OSE and WP:Citing sources might also be of benefit to you, as might WP:NPA given that you are making grossly unfounded accusations against me. - Sitush ( talk) 07:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Argh! Abstracts are the same as snippet views, which you have already been told are not acceptable because they lack context. Furthermore, the abstract does not support the 12% figure that you had added at Saint Thomas Christians. As far as the Wikipedia article is concerned, I've already said that the table relates to 1968, which is what the E&PW journal article concerns. My question was, why do you think that it needs tagging? Are you saying that the 1968 landholdings table data is not shown in the E&PW article by Sivanandan? Or what?
You seem to be developing a tendency to fudge issues and dodge questions: it does not help your case. - Sitush ( talk) 09:31, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
I am not messing with this issue any further here: you know that you are lacking in incompetence regarding policies etc, I've fixed an article that you could have tried to fix yourself, and you are scattering red herrings all over the place. Just be aware that I will continue to keep a very close eye on your contributions until you come to understand what WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:RS. WP:CIRCULAR, WP:FAKE etc mean. - Sitush ( talk) 09:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Ezhava: Citations 8,9,10,14,21,22 and 32 are not full. Could be verified again.
Nambutiri: A section is there without any citation.
Caste system in India - Lot of sources need full citation
Arya Vaishya- Lots of un-sources info
Caste system in Kerala-In STC you were quick to add the qualifier "Myth" with the tradition of St.Thomas. But, you have still not undertook any action regarding the misrepresentation of Parasurama Myth as a fact which we have already discussed in Talk:Caste_system_in_Kerala#POV_issue:_Myth_of_Parasuraman_cited_as_fact
One more thing your behaviour: When I 1st added my contributions in Nambudiri, you swiftly removed it citing the reason as "Poorly phrased and improper citation". But when I protested you suddenly changed your stand to "copyvio". These types of manipulations will surely spoil your image. -- AshLey Msg 12:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Please be careful at Iyengar. It is a highly contentious article at the moment and you lack the experience if it heats up. Take a look at the talk page. - Sitush ( talk) 08:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ashley_thomas80,
While I am sure you think the image should be kept, all non-free images hosted on Wikipedia must meet all of the
non-free content criteria. In this case the nominator claimed it did not meet
WP:NFCC#8 which means that he is claiming that the lack of the image would not significantly harm reader's understanding of the topic. Another editor agreed and I didn't find your arguments addressed this issue sufficiently to keep the image. I can see also now that there are at least
two free images of the cross on Wikimedia's Commons site - either of which could be used in the article -
Peripitus
(Talk)
10:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
naveenpf ( talk) 14:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you naveen -- AshLey Msg 14:17, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Howdy, and welcome to WikiProject Red Link Recovery.
As you are also a member of WikiProject Kerala, I have added a set of suggested fixes for red links in the scope of this project to the Red Link Recovery Live tool.
I've also activated the Malayalam language within the tool. It's understanding of the language is rather poor right now, but a small set of suggested fixes for red links on the Malayalam language Wikipedia are there in case they are of interest to you.
- TB ( talk) 18:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kerala. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 12:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Creation of File:Hornbill kerala.jpg was totally unnecessary. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Please learn the colon trick to refer to an image rather than use it. If you cannot type the script (is it Malayam?), you can at least use copy and paste. I am not surprised that you cannot see a link: File:Great hornbill 614.jpg does not translate into File:വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക്.JPG. You need to learn your way about the Commons. If you do, you will see that I created File:Great hornbill 614.jpg as a redirect to provide a better solution to your non-problem. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I am very confused. Perhaps first you should address the question: why do you keep quoting
File:വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക്.JPG (1) when the correct title is
File:വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക്.JPG (2)? Now in my browsers name (2) appears with three of the characters replaced with little rectangles indicating that my screen fonts don't know about those codes - but despite that (2) works and (1) does not. I have restored
File:വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക്.JPG it does not work if you use it to add an image to an article - probably the mix of redirect and Commons is too much for the software. But it does contain the valid #REDIRECT [[File:വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക്.JPG]] which you created. So explain this to me - if you were able to copy and paste വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക് into that redirect, why were you not able to copy and paste it into an image declaration in the
Kerala article? (If you had created it on the Commons, it probably would have worked.) Is it simply a problem of copying from browser address bar instead of rendered text? Incidentally the two "this page" links above don't work (it's that pesky colon business again). When corrected they become identical and should be:
this page. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs)
16:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Almost certainly your browser. See this diff! I assume you did not intentionally change my message. I am reversing that diff by hand with this edit - using Opera. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
This edit is being done using my version of Google Chrome to see if it does any changes. The change of the link to To Read in Malayalam is done by me not the browser! It shows you the proper way to do interwiki links. If you need further help, I suggest you contact Praveenp or one of the other editors of the To Read in Malayam help page. And of course you could try a different browser. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
I have put a request in at user talk:Praveenp. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:43, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
I have indirectly mentioned you at WP:ANI. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Discussion_review.2C_please, where all should hopefully become clear. Although I am expecting to be given short shrift for posting the request there :( Nothing to panic about: any discussion should probably remain at WT:INB. - Sitush ( talk) 13:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bronyetransportyor. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 01:15, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
I gave reasons in my edit summaries where I removed your citation needed. For instance, see my edit summary here. Besides, few of cn tags added by you were unnecessary. Such as, the last line here has a citation for the part "The Hindu rites of cremation are seen since the Rigvedic period; while they are attested from early times in the Cemetery H culture" and gives a primary source ( Rig Vedic verse) for the second part "there is a late Rigvedic reference invoking forefathers "both cremated (agnidagdhá-) and uncremated (ánagnidagdha-)". You need to explain further in your edit summaries why cn tags are still required in such lines. I see you have also added other new tags this time which seem alright. But as and when your cn tag is deleted with a reason, please give your own reasons for keeping them to resolve the conflict. CorrectKnowledge ( talk) 13:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
In your revert on Kerala here, the reason you mentioned is WP:COI which is totally incorrect and mostly seemed to be a WP:POV. You seem to have a misundersatnding of Wikipedia's policies as Sitush rightly points out. Please take time and go through some of Wikipedia's policies like WP:NOT, WP:OR, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:POV, WP:COI, WP:CV and many other related policies so that you have a clear understanding and give the right reason in your revert. — Abhishek Talk 14:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
In case you might miss it, this is a summary of the montage discussion. - Sitush ( talk) 21:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Ashley, could you opine here? -- InarZan Verifiable 16:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 13:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the comment at WP:INB - you might find this interesting. The length to which what appears to me filibustering is happening to avoid “Nairs were historically enlisted in military” in the article lead-sentence is very disturbing. VS Vettakkorumakansnehi ( talk) 21:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saint Alphonsa of Kerala.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ...Captain...... Tälk tö me... 16:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Republic of Ireland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Macclesfield Bank. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 16:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pakistan Zindabad. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 05:15, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2012 Pacific hurricane season. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 18:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for inviting me to review the article. I have only managed to read two of many many articles that focus on this aspect of the state of Kerala. From the little I know, I feel I am neither adequately informed nor reasonably qualified to comment yet. ApostleVonColorado ( talk) 12:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Srebrenica massacre. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 07:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I have seen the talk, that page is in my watchlist. I'll keep watching the discussion. It is surprising that people are spending so much time on these issues rather than improving the article! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 17:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gulf War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 20:15, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
You may be interested in these four pages: one page related to Kerala and three pages related to India.
— Wavelength ( talk) 02:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
1. I know Jack, the tallest boy in the school team.
2. The tallest boy, Jack, is a member of the school team.
I think that 1 is OK while I'm really confused with 2. Could you please enlighten me in this matter?
They do really an appreciable service at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language. I found you replying some queries there, a selfless service to the open world. Thanks a lot for your kind guidance and help, sir. AshLey Msg 09:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bloody Christmas. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 09:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.
We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of African-American firsts. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 22:15, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome! dear visitor..............
Hello, Ashleythomas80 , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Sorry, I am a bit late but welcome all the same. --
P.K.Niyogi
15:37, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Nedumpally#Irrelevant_information for my concerns about the article Nedumpally. I'm not vandalizing the article or trying to be critical of the community. It's simply that the article is not in a good shape according to the Wikipedia guidelines. Keeping the information relevant and sourcing it rigorously is important to make the page a good article. utcursch | talk 14:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Dear Ashleypt,
I have wikified some of the passages that were added in the light of the dispute resolution responses. This is not edit war. I just wanted to let you know that. Much of what you wrote is there and I have wikified passages as per neutrality of dispute resolution. thanks Robin klein ( talk) 13:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Dear Ashleypt,
I have changed Aryan-Brahmin, Dravidian, Jains etc as local people and Jews and Arabs as West Asian semitic. I have not mentioned any particular community. I have used broad terms that encompasses these peoples. I have not been partisan. The accusation is fallacious. thanks Robin klein ( talk) 15:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
You are vandalising the syrian malabar nasrani page by inserting texts into references and removing citations. Please stop this. Robin klein ( talk) 14:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ashleypt, this is just to say that I have been following the reverts at Syrian Malabar Nasrani over the last two days, and it looks like you are in a slow edit war with Robin klein. You really need to talk out the changes on the talk page before you revert, otherwise it might result in you being blocked. Although WP:3RR is a bright-line rule, it is not a lower limit - slow edit warring can also result in a block. I recommended that you take this to the Mediation Cabal in my thread on the dispute resolution noticeboard, and I still think that would be the best idea; if you don't want to do this, though, you can try another form of dispute resolution, such as an RfC. Whatever you choose, you can't simply keep reverting without discussing the article contents at all. Although my role at the DRN is usually a peaceful one, if the edit warring on this page continues for much longer, I am thinking of reporting you both to WP:AN3 in an effort to start some useful dialogue. Regards — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 13:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Dear Ashleypt,
I agree that the interpretation of the Nasrani symbol with the Jewish menorah is contentious. I shall modify it to remove the pov. However I should add that even the interpretation of the Nasrani symbol as christianity coming to land of Buddha is very contentious and a very recent one and equally questionable. After all these are interpretations not ascribed definitions. thanks Robin klein ( talk) 19:38, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Syrian Malabar Nasrani , has been proposed for a
merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going
here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Cúchullain
t/
c
14:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Support: The name Syrian Malabar Nasrani is vague, especially for a non-Malayalee. The word Syrian is misleading; the word Malabar is an anachronism and the word Nasrani is unfamiliar to many. Wikipedia articles are read by people all over the world. But the name Saint Thomas Christians (not St. Thomas Christians) is specific and more suitable for a worldwide publication. So, I support the merger. Neduvelilmathew ( talk) 18:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ashley Thomas,
You have added the name of Padma Bhushan K.J. Jesudas in the list of Syrian Malabar Nasrani. Are you sure he is a Syrian Christian? His wife Prabha is. Neduvelilmathew ( talk) 18:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Stthomas_cross.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sreejith K ( talk) 13:37, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Stthomas cross.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Ashley, please do remember to log in when making edits. It allows others to follow who's saying and doing what. Thanks,-- Cúchullain t/ c 17:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, are you able to help fix the recent IP addition to Bible translations into Malayalam? The style, formatting and English is problematic, but it looks as if it contains some valuable content. Can you help? In ictu oculi ( talk) 10:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Saint Thomas Christians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Joseph ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
I notice that you have added two responses at Talk:Caste system in Kerala. Those responses were to comments made as long ago as July 2010. Is there really any benefit in continuing something that has lain dormant for as long as this? I think that you would be better starting a new thread for such things as, among other issues, the chances are not particularly great that the people who originated those old discussions are still around. You could always refer to the earlier discussion in your new one. - Sitush ( talk) 09:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you really do seem to be on a mission to mention Syrian Christians in as many tangential articles as possible. Are you confident that you do not have a conflict of interest? Your latest edit, at Caste system in India, specifically says that they were not in the system ... so why are you mentioning them at all? It seems daft to me. Peru is not in Europe but we don't say that in the Europe article. - Sitush ( talk) 13:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
If you have not got it and would like to see it then be quick! - Sitush ( talk) 14:18, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Regarding your "myth" query, that is really one that you should ask on the relevant talk page. But my response would be "yes, it does", and it goes on to explain that there is more than one theory. Actually, I would like to expand on that in the article. - Sitush ( talk) 01:13, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
This edit is a borderline attack and a certain breach of WP:AGF. Just because sometimes you do not get your own way, does not mean that those who thought otherwise have an agenda - political or otherwise - or that they were acting in bad faith. The fact is that a lot of what you say in discussions has some merit but you are not getting to grips with issues such as weight and there really does seem at times to be a problem with comprehension. I have no idea whether or not English is your first language but you certainly seem to be very capable in both reading and writing it when it suits, so perhaps you are just losing things in the heat of the moment. If that is the case, and I could be wrong, then it might be worthwhile you remembering that Wikipedia is timeless - there is rarely any need to rush to add or delete content from articles, aside from in situations where there are copyright violations or violations of policies such as WP:BLP.
You have made several assumptions of bad faith etc recently, along the lines of the one that I have referred to above. Should it happen again any time soon then I will be issuing a more formal warning. You are dealing with some experienced editors for whom such comments are wateIr off a duck's back, but such comments set a bad example and they engender an atmosphere of non-cooperation, which is exactly what Wikipedia needs to avoid if it is to progress. - Sitush ( talk) 16:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stthomas cross.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor ( talk) 04:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Please log in to make comments, otherwise we don't know you had anything to do with uploading the image. ww2censor ( talk) 14:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Have you seen this comment? - Sitush ( talk) 07:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Shrike ( talk) 19:58, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Two notes, as the protecting admin. First, as Sitush describes above, copyright violations cannot appear in Wikipedia for any length of time--that is, you cannot add a copyright violation, then say that you're going to fix it in future edits. You need to do all of the "fixing" in the edit window before submitting, or work on it off Wiki first then bring it here. That being said, the truth is that you can't fix copyright violations that way anyway. That is, you can't take text someone already wrote and then edit it (by changing words or grammar here and there). Instead, you need to completely rewrite the info, summarizing the key points, from the ground up. The line between "summary", "close paraphrasing", "plagiarism", and "copyright violation" is very difficult to negotiate, but in my experience (as both a WP editor and an English teacher) is that the worst approach is to start with a copy of the text and then make incremental changes. Instead, read the entire text, figure out what the important information is, then write that in your own words. Of course, your final product still has to match the information in the original, but it needs to have entirely novel phrasing. Second, note that though I protected Nambudiri after you had edited it, that is in no way an endorsement of the most recent version. You now need to go to the article's talk page and discuss the issues between you and Sitush. He has clearly been trying to talk to you here, but I don't really see that you've been doing that, except to place some warnings on his talk page that don't even make sense. If you do not engage in discussions, and instead return to reverting on that article after the protection expires, instead of protection, next time an admin will just block you instead. Wikipedia works by collaboration, not by fighting. Qwyrxian ( talk) 23:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Shrike ( talk) 15:34, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
I realise that you must think that I am hounding you but, in fact, I am merely trying to sort out problems with your edits. I've no idea exactly what is going on with your sourcing but inserting a sourced statement at Saint Thomas Christians (relating to the forward caste/12 per cent issue) when it seems that the source did not support the statement was unfortunate. Worse, you then reinstated the statement an hour or so later, using a different source. I raised some points about that second source (Sivanandan) in this thread, including that I could not find where it supported the statement. You responded to that thread here but ignored my query regarding the source. Then I find that you have just requested it at WP:RX. The implication is that you used a source that you had not in fact consulted.
Now, we have had a similar implication discussed at Talk:Caste system in Kerala#Journal of Kerala Studies and there have also been other incidents relating to sourcing and to cherrypicking etc.
Mistakes will happen but I am becoming very concerned about your methods and this is one of the reasons why I am having to check pretty much every source that you cite. Sorry about this, but there is a need for care. Sloppy editing, such as I fixed in this series of edits, is usually quite easy to spot and resolve but citation errors are both more critical and often more difficult to spot. Someone has to do it. - Sitush ( talk) 16:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
I am afraid you appear to be going backwards at the moment, and I really would advise that you read in full some of our basic policies, such as WP:V and WP:RS. A read of WP:OSE and WP:Citing sources might also be of benefit to you, as might WP:NPA given that you are making grossly unfounded accusations against me. - Sitush ( talk) 07:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Argh! Abstracts are the same as snippet views, which you have already been told are not acceptable because they lack context. Furthermore, the abstract does not support the 12% figure that you had added at Saint Thomas Christians. As far as the Wikipedia article is concerned, I've already said that the table relates to 1968, which is what the E&PW journal article concerns. My question was, why do you think that it needs tagging? Are you saying that the 1968 landholdings table data is not shown in the E&PW article by Sivanandan? Or what?
You seem to be developing a tendency to fudge issues and dodge questions: it does not help your case. - Sitush ( talk) 09:31, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
I am not messing with this issue any further here: you know that you are lacking in incompetence regarding policies etc, I've fixed an article that you could have tried to fix yourself, and you are scattering red herrings all over the place. Just be aware that I will continue to keep a very close eye on your contributions until you come to understand what WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:RS. WP:CIRCULAR, WP:FAKE etc mean. - Sitush ( talk) 09:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Ezhava: Citations 8,9,10,14,21,22 and 32 are not full. Could be verified again.
Nambutiri: A section is there without any citation.
Caste system in India - Lot of sources need full citation
Arya Vaishya- Lots of un-sources info
Caste system in Kerala-In STC you were quick to add the qualifier "Myth" with the tradition of St.Thomas. But, you have still not undertook any action regarding the misrepresentation of Parasurama Myth as a fact which we have already discussed in Talk:Caste_system_in_Kerala#POV_issue:_Myth_of_Parasuraman_cited_as_fact
One more thing your behaviour: When I 1st added my contributions in Nambudiri, you swiftly removed it citing the reason as "Poorly phrased and improper citation". But when I protested you suddenly changed your stand to "copyvio". These types of manipulations will surely spoil your image. -- AshLey Msg 12:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Please be careful at Iyengar. It is a highly contentious article at the moment and you lack the experience if it heats up. Take a look at the talk page. - Sitush ( talk) 08:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ashley_thomas80,
While I am sure you think the image should be kept, all non-free images hosted on Wikipedia must meet all of the
non-free content criteria. In this case the nominator claimed it did not meet
WP:NFCC#8 which means that he is claiming that the lack of the image would not significantly harm reader's understanding of the topic. Another editor agreed and I didn't find your arguments addressed this issue sufficiently to keep the image. I can see also now that there are at least
two free images of the cross on Wikimedia's Commons site - either of which could be used in the article -
Peripitus
(Talk)
10:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
naveenpf ( talk) 14:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you naveen -- AshLey Msg 14:17, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Howdy, and welcome to WikiProject Red Link Recovery.
As you are also a member of WikiProject Kerala, I have added a set of suggested fixes for red links in the scope of this project to the Red Link Recovery Live tool.
I've also activated the Malayalam language within the tool. It's understanding of the language is rather poor right now, but a small set of suggested fixes for red links on the Malayalam language Wikipedia are there in case they are of interest to you.
- TB ( talk) 18:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kerala. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 12:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Creation of File:Hornbill kerala.jpg was totally unnecessary. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Please learn the colon trick to refer to an image rather than use it. If you cannot type the script (is it Malayam?), you can at least use copy and paste. I am not surprised that you cannot see a link: File:Great hornbill 614.jpg does not translate into File:വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക്.JPG. You need to learn your way about the Commons. If you do, you will see that I created File:Great hornbill 614.jpg as a redirect to provide a better solution to your non-problem. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I am very confused. Perhaps first you should address the question: why do you keep quoting
File:വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക്.JPG (1) when the correct title is
File:വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക്.JPG (2)? Now in my browsers name (2) appears with three of the characters replaced with little rectangles indicating that my screen fonts don't know about those codes - but despite that (2) works and (1) does not. I have restored
File:വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക്.JPG it does not work if you use it to add an image to an article - probably the mix of redirect and Commons is too much for the software. But it does contain the valid #REDIRECT [[File:വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക്.JPG]] which you created. So explain this to me - if you were able to copy and paste വേഴാമ്പല്-ബന്നാര്ക്കട്ട-പാര്ക്ക് into that redirect, why were you not able to copy and paste it into an image declaration in the
Kerala article? (If you had created it on the Commons, it probably would have worked.) Is it simply a problem of copying from browser address bar instead of rendered text? Incidentally the two "this page" links above don't work (it's that pesky colon business again). When corrected they become identical and should be:
this page. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs)
16:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Almost certainly your browser. See this diff! I assume you did not intentionally change my message. I am reversing that diff by hand with this edit - using Opera. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
This edit is being done using my version of Google Chrome to see if it does any changes. The change of the link to To Read in Malayalam is done by me not the browser! It shows you the proper way to do interwiki links. If you need further help, I suggest you contact Praveenp or one of the other editors of the To Read in Malayam help page. And of course you could try a different browser. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
I have put a request in at user talk:Praveenp. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:43, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
I have indirectly mentioned you at WP:ANI. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Discussion_review.2C_please, where all should hopefully become clear. Although I am expecting to be given short shrift for posting the request there :( Nothing to panic about: any discussion should probably remain at WT:INB. - Sitush ( talk) 13:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bronyetransportyor. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 01:15, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
I gave reasons in my edit summaries where I removed your citation needed. For instance, see my edit summary here. Besides, few of cn tags added by you were unnecessary. Such as, the last line here has a citation for the part "The Hindu rites of cremation are seen since the Rigvedic period; while they are attested from early times in the Cemetery H culture" and gives a primary source ( Rig Vedic verse) for the second part "there is a late Rigvedic reference invoking forefathers "both cremated (agnidagdhá-) and uncremated (ánagnidagdha-)". You need to explain further in your edit summaries why cn tags are still required in such lines. I see you have also added other new tags this time which seem alright. But as and when your cn tag is deleted with a reason, please give your own reasons for keeping them to resolve the conflict. CorrectKnowledge ( talk) 13:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
In your revert on Kerala here, the reason you mentioned is WP:COI which is totally incorrect and mostly seemed to be a WP:POV. You seem to have a misundersatnding of Wikipedia's policies as Sitush rightly points out. Please take time and go through some of Wikipedia's policies like WP:NOT, WP:OR, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:POV, WP:COI, WP:CV and many other related policies so that you have a clear understanding and give the right reason in your revert. — Abhishek Talk 14:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
In case you might miss it, this is a summary of the montage discussion. - Sitush ( talk) 21:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Ashley, could you opine here? -- InarZan Verifiable 16:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 13:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the comment at WP:INB - you might find this interesting. The length to which what appears to me filibustering is happening to avoid “Nairs were historically enlisted in military” in the article lead-sentence is very disturbing. VS Vettakkorumakansnehi ( talk) 21:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saint Alphonsa of Kerala.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ...Captain...... Tälk tö me... 16:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Republic of Ireland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Macclesfield Bank. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 16:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pakistan Zindabad. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 05:15, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2012 Pacific hurricane season. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 18:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for inviting me to review the article. I have only managed to read two of many many articles that focus on this aspect of the state of Kerala. From the little I know, I feel I am neither adequately informed nor reasonably qualified to comment yet. ApostleVonColorado ( talk) 12:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Srebrenica massacre. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 07:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I have seen the talk, that page is in my watchlist. I'll keep watching the discussion. It is surprising that people are spending so much time on these issues rather than improving the article! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 17:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gulf War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 20:15, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
You may be interested in these four pages: one page related to Kerala and three pages related to India.
— Wavelength ( talk) 02:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
1. I know Jack, the tallest boy in the school team.
2. The tallest boy, Jack, is a member of the school team.
I think that 1 is OK while I'm really confused with 2. Could you please enlighten me in this matter?
They do really an appreciable service at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language. I found you replying some queries there, a selfless service to the open world. Thanks a lot for your kind guidance and help, sir. AshLey Msg 09:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bloody Christmas. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 09:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.
We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of African-American firsts. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 22:15, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |