Hi. We request that paid editors and others with a conflict of interest don't create articles directly in mainspace. Instead they should disclose who is paying them, and submit their articles through the articles for creation process. I've moved your article to Draft:Ibrahim S. Quraishi (visual artist). – Thjarkur (talk) 01:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, AshleyBell208. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Thjarkur (talk) 01:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Hi, thank you so much for declaring. There are multiple instances in the article on Quarashi where the text is being very liberal with sources, not directly reflecting what the cited sources say. Please add URLs to the articles that are missing and take care to only include information directly verified in the cited sources. The current sources don't demonstrate that well that he has gotten significant coverage from multiple independant sources, most mentions seem very short. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for notifying me. I will review the article once more and make the necessary changes. Ashley.Bell ( talk) 22:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
WP:COIEDIT: you should put new articles through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process instead of creating them directly. Much of Wikipedia's rules are not literally mandatory, but we have limited patience with editors who go against these guidelines. Your articles are sub-par and require review. The majority of the sources on Draft:Nicolas Porter are press relesases or spam blogs and should be removed. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
How are these recommendations? This seems like bullying and harassment. Ashley.Bell ( talk) 22:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AshleyBell208. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
My personal favorites:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Fresh Pawz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 02:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, AshleyBell208!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DGG (
talk )
06:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Nicolas Porter (dentist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 22:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi AshleyBell208! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Hi AshleyBell208! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is MNB9911 sockfarm and Pro Creative Writers. Thank you. ☆ Bri ( talk) 17:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolas Porter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Porter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep Talk 15:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. We request that paid editors and others with a conflict of interest don't create articles directly in mainspace. Instead they should disclose who is paying them, and submit their articles through the articles for creation process. I've moved your article to Draft:Ibrahim S. Quraishi (visual artist). – Thjarkur (talk) 01:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, AshleyBell208. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Thjarkur (talk) 01:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Hi, thank you so much for declaring. There are multiple instances in the article on Quarashi where the text is being very liberal with sources, not directly reflecting what the cited sources say. Please add URLs to the articles that are missing and take care to only include information directly verified in the cited sources. The current sources don't demonstrate that well that he has gotten significant coverage from multiple independant sources, most mentions seem very short. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for notifying me. I will review the article once more and make the necessary changes. Ashley.Bell ( talk) 22:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
WP:COIEDIT: you should put new articles through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process instead of creating them directly. Much of Wikipedia's rules are not literally mandatory, but we have limited patience with editors who go against these guidelines. Your articles are sub-par and require review. The majority of the sources on Draft:Nicolas Porter are press relesases or spam blogs and should be removed. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
How are these recommendations? This seems like bullying and harassment. Ashley.Bell ( talk) 22:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AshleyBell208. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
My personal favorites:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Fresh Pawz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 02:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, AshleyBell208!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DGG (
talk )
06:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Nicolas Porter (dentist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 22:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi AshleyBell208! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Hi AshleyBell208! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is MNB9911 sockfarm and Pro Creative Writers. Thank you. ☆ Bri ( talk) 17:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolas Porter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Porter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep Talk 15:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)