This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 2015 | ← | Archive 2018 | Archive 2019 | Archive 2020 |
I may have overdone it a bit and was wondering if anything could or should be trimmed. :) Thanks Serendi pod ous 03:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
It's here. In it, it says: "Decades, however, are commonly categorized based on the year numbers. For example, we say “the eighties” instead of “the 199th decade.” Similarly, the upcoming decade is technically the 203rd decade, but we call it “the twenties.” According to this common definition, decades generally encompass the time span from years ending with 0 to years ending with 9, such as 2020 – 2029.". What do you think? Should we add this? WildEric19 ( talk) 17:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
I think it would be good to leave the mention of the ordinal decade that you removed from the 2020s article. The Decade article explains the ordinal usage and could be the reference. -- Lance E Sloan ( talk) 20:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Hey Mate,
I wondered why you are adamant that the New decade issue should be removed. Is it that you don't find it relevant to the 2020 page, or that the sources need to be better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.120.28.200 ( talk) 18:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpretedrather than
reasonably construed.
Yes there are a few that are specifically dated, but they are few and far between. Serendi pod ous 01:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
What are the requirements of notability to be on the 1991 year page. I believe that these are pretty notable people. just because their pages aren't to the best of conditions doesn't mean it's not a notable person. I could personally improve their pages. these importance tags are just labeling them to be removed. what about Hailu Yimenu's page? the page has barely any citation and no biography on the person but you still include them on the death list. you are sending mixed signals. From SomeBodyAnyBody05 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeBodyAnyBody05 ( talk • contribs) 08:23, January 8, 2020 (UTC)
Also how was my first edit inappropriate? I responded with my opinion on the other user's comments? in a discussion page i express personal views and opinion and my "opinion" wasn't that big of a opinion as I state that celebrities should have pages no matter what they did in their personal life. you should have given a warning to the discussion starter. I mean no harm or vandalism . From SomeBodyAnyBody05 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeBodyAnyBody05 ( talk • contribs) 21:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Hey Arthur
Thanks for the message that you left on my talk page. As I'm new here, I'm not fully aware of the exact guidelines of Wikipedia. However, you mentioned that I had added personal and opinionated material. May I ask which sections of my edit that this was? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JMonkey2006 ( talk • contribs) 01:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Actually it's true since wikipedia is a enclyopedia and should include almost all celebrities no matter what they are notable of. And I didn't attack anybody If you actually read what I said I was backing up your precious guidelines as wikipedia should be of fact. The original discussion attacks the wikipedia page as a whole. And also you Immediately removing The Lynn Hauldren entry is also insufficient as lynn hauldren was actually very notable as the running mascot for the empire company. SomeBodyAnyBody05 ( talk) 21:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Well he is technically a celebrity as his likeness is still being used after his death. You can't say he is not notable of having a page when you have one even though if I go into the generalpublic of the city I inhabit and ask them who Arthur Rubin is and no shocker they wouldn't know. PS I posted my reply on the wrong discussion page. SomeBodyAnyBody05 ( talk) 03:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
It's not completely clear why, but after some 9 months all of the material I added regarding the expansion of the Universe was removed from the above article.
There is a relevant section on the talk page. Perhaps some additional comment as to the rationale could be made there? (It seems the discussion of the Universe being vacuum at 10^106 years was not arbitrary as that was the point at which all Black Holes will have evaporated. The specifics provided were mathematically computed from conservative published future values of the Hubble parameter. I can see how some might debate the earlier entries, but I don't really understand why the last one doesn't pass muster). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsbaker0 ( talk • contribs) 12:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Your appeal request at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard has been closed. The result of the appeal is that your topic ban from the subject of gun control is converted to a 1RR restriction for any edits in the gun control area. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the constructive feedback regarding my recent edits to the 2020 page. I have taken appropriate actions in accordance with your advice. User:216.230.42.71 Talk to me 04:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
I have no idea why you'd do this because the scheduled events I listed, were in fact, True. There is factual proof that the government has said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WilliamBeanFanatic2 ( talk • contribs) 18:10, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
Hey,
I'm new to contributing to Wikipedia so still trying to understand why my edit on the 2020s page about ongoing major protests in India was changed in your revision, as seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=2020s&type=revision&diff=938879663&oldid=938757655
Was there a reason for that, or something that I don't know? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardeepasrani ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
This edit [2] was reverted with given reason, a new account seems to have been created just to add this information back [3]. The new account [4]. Well am not sure if this is sufficient for an SPI but since you are a senior editor in time line articles I am bring the matter to you. Dilbaggg ( talk) 15:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Saw the edit backwards when I reverted it, thought I was replacing "rising" with "increasing" lol. Anyway thanks! MaxwellMolecule ( talk) 22:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop reverting every single edit that I make. Analog Horror, ( Communicate) 00:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
I changed the tense here for consistency with every other sport in that section which all use the past tense. - Blurryman ( talk) 00:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
must notundo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than
should not.
Regarding my addition to the 17 page, I thought the info very relevant. Since there are only 2 entries under Video Games, I wanted to add that there is a website where, currently, 179 instances of the number 17 in video games is catalogued. If you'd show me how, I could add the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Politishin ( talk • contribs) 23:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
You have been asked to explain some things at your ANI thread. Please answer there before you make any more edits in the main space. Thanks. Step hen 10:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
I have blocked you from editing the mainspace until you answer all questions raised at your ANI thread. Step hen 22:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
@ Arthur Rubin: You sure did some good work on Wenatchee child abuse prosecutions (and related pages) back in the day, and I hope you can help with that page again. So I hope you can get these issues resolved. DougHill ( talk) 18:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
Could you please explain your rationale behind reverting the inclusion of a far better image with the edit summary "bad image" here, and in other places please? The Rambling Man ( Staying alive since 2005!) 22:48, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list
The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.
The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.
To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.
– PPelberg (WMF) ( talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
The Special Barnstar | |
Sorry to hear that you retired from here. Thanks for all you have done. LoreMaster22 ( talk) 04:58, 29 May 2020 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list
This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.
@
. You can
test the new features on the
Beta Cluster. Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months.– Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community.
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles.
Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:
Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 02:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Dear Arthur Rubin/Archive 2020,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 16:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.
The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).
The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.
Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.
Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 18:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
mustor
shoulduse the articles for creation process.
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 22nd century in fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/22nd century in fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beland ( talk) 08:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.( American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Interface administrator changes
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 2015 | ← | Archive 2018 | Archive 2019 | Archive 2020 |
I may have overdone it a bit and was wondering if anything could or should be trimmed. :) Thanks Serendi pod ous 03:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
It's here. In it, it says: "Decades, however, are commonly categorized based on the year numbers. For example, we say “the eighties” instead of “the 199th decade.” Similarly, the upcoming decade is technically the 203rd decade, but we call it “the twenties.” According to this common definition, decades generally encompass the time span from years ending with 0 to years ending with 9, such as 2020 – 2029.". What do you think? Should we add this? WildEric19 ( talk) 17:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
I think it would be good to leave the mention of the ordinal decade that you removed from the 2020s article. The Decade article explains the ordinal usage and could be the reference. -- Lance E Sloan ( talk) 20:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Hey Mate,
I wondered why you are adamant that the New decade issue should be removed. Is it that you don't find it relevant to the 2020 page, or that the sources need to be better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.120.28.200 ( talk) 18:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpretedrather than
reasonably construed.
Yes there are a few that are specifically dated, but they are few and far between. Serendi pod ous 01:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
What are the requirements of notability to be on the 1991 year page. I believe that these are pretty notable people. just because their pages aren't to the best of conditions doesn't mean it's not a notable person. I could personally improve their pages. these importance tags are just labeling them to be removed. what about Hailu Yimenu's page? the page has barely any citation and no biography on the person but you still include them on the death list. you are sending mixed signals. From SomeBodyAnyBody05 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeBodyAnyBody05 ( talk • contribs) 08:23, January 8, 2020 (UTC)
Also how was my first edit inappropriate? I responded with my opinion on the other user's comments? in a discussion page i express personal views and opinion and my "opinion" wasn't that big of a opinion as I state that celebrities should have pages no matter what they did in their personal life. you should have given a warning to the discussion starter. I mean no harm or vandalism . From SomeBodyAnyBody05 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeBodyAnyBody05 ( talk • contribs) 21:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Hey Arthur
Thanks for the message that you left on my talk page. As I'm new here, I'm not fully aware of the exact guidelines of Wikipedia. However, you mentioned that I had added personal and opinionated material. May I ask which sections of my edit that this was? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JMonkey2006 ( talk • contribs) 01:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Actually it's true since wikipedia is a enclyopedia and should include almost all celebrities no matter what they are notable of. And I didn't attack anybody If you actually read what I said I was backing up your precious guidelines as wikipedia should be of fact. The original discussion attacks the wikipedia page as a whole. And also you Immediately removing The Lynn Hauldren entry is also insufficient as lynn hauldren was actually very notable as the running mascot for the empire company. SomeBodyAnyBody05 ( talk) 21:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Well he is technically a celebrity as his likeness is still being used after his death. You can't say he is not notable of having a page when you have one even though if I go into the generalpublic of the city I inhabit and ask them who Arthur Rubin is and no shocker they wouldn't know. PS I posted my reply on the wrong discussion page. SomeBodyAnyBody05 ( talk) 03:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
It's not completely clear why, but after some 9 months all of the material I added regarding the expansion of the Universe was removed from the above article.
There is a relevant section on the talk page. Perhaps some additional comment as to the rationale could be made there? (It seems the discussion of the Universe being vacuum at 10^106 years was not arbitrary as that was the point at which all Black Holes will have evaporated. The specifics provided were mathematically computed from conservative published future values of the Hubble parameter. I can see how some might debate the earlier entries, but I don't really understand why the last one doesn't pass muster). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsbaker0 ( talk • contribs) 12:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Your appeal request at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard has been closed. The result of the appeal is that your topic ban from the subject of gun control is converted to a 1RR restriction for any edits in the gun control area. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the constructive feedback regarding my recent edits to the 2020 page. I have taken appropriate actions in accordance with your advice. User:216.230.42.71 Talk to me 04:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
I have no idea why you'd do this because the scheduled events I listed, were in fact, True. There is factual proof that the government has said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WilliamBeanFanatic2 ( talk • contribs) 18:10, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
Hey,
I'm new to contributing to Wikipedia so still trying to understand why my edit on the 2020s page about ongoing major protests in India was changed in your revision, as seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=2020s&type=revision&diff=938879663&oldid=938757655
Was there a reason for that, or something that I don't know? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardeepasrani ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
This edit [2] was reverted with given reason, a new account seems to have been created just to add this information back [3]. The new account [4]. Well am not sure if this is sufficient for an SPI but since you are a senior editor in time line articles I am bring the matter to you. Dilbaggg ( talk) 15:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Saw the edit backwards when I reverted it, thought I was replacing "rising" with "increasing" lol. Anyway thanks! MaxwellMolecule ( talk) 22:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop reverting every single edit that I make. Analog Horror, ( Communicate) 00:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
I changed the tense here for consistency with every other sport in that section which all use the past tense. - Blurryman ( talk) 00:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
must notundo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than
should not.
Regarding my addition to the 17 page, I thought the info very relevant. Since there are only 2 entries under Video Games, I wanted to add that there is a website where, currently, 179 instances of the number 17 in video games is catalogued. If you'd show me how, I could add the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Politishin ( talk • contribs) 23:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
You have been asked to explain some things at your ANI thread. Please answer there before you make any more edits in the main space. Thanks. Step hen 10:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
I have blocked you from editing the mainspace until you answer all questions raised at your ANI thread. Step hen 22:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
@ Arthur Rubin: You sure did some good work on Wenatchee child abuse prosecutions (and related pages) back in the day, and I hope you can help with that page again. So I hope you can get these issues resolved. DougHill ( talk) 18:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
Could you please explain your rationale behind reverting the inclusion of a far better image with the edit summary "bad image" here, and in other places please? The Rambling Man ( Staying alive since 2005!) 22:48, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list
The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.
The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.
To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.
– PPelberg (WMF) ( talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
The Special Barnstar | |
Sorry to hear that you retired from here. Thanks for all you have done. LoreMaster22 ( talk) 04:58, 29 May 2020 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list
This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.
@
. You can
test the new features on the
Beta Cluster. Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months.– Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community.
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles.
Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:
Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 02:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Dear Arthur Rubin/Archive 2020,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 16:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.
The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).
The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.
Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.
Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 18:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
mustor
shoulduse the articles for creation process.
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 22nd century in fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/22nd century in fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beland ( talk) 08:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.( American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Interface administrator changes