Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did with
this edit to
Barry Larkin, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. —
Jeff
G. ツ
02:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Indrian ( talk) 21:48, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Barry Larkin. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) ( talk) 21:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
To be clear - the edit warring isn't the only issue here; the information you continue to add is a violation of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If the information is restored you will be blocked from editing, and if you switch to an IP address to make the edits it will be blocked as well. Wikipedia is not the venue to play out your personal vendetta against Mr. Larkin. -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 22:12, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
The info I have provided is very true and accurate. Ill update it with more details if needed but you all act like what I'm posting im lying about.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Barry Larkin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Barry Larkin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Falcon8765
(TALK)
03:33, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
What I have posted i have told the truth and posted my proof yet this cant be added. Why are you all working for Mr larkin or something. Arom1221 ( talk) 03:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
I have posted Facts and this is not my opinion on Mr Larkin. If it was my opinion I would go into more details. This made the major paper in Cincinnati. Arom1221 ( talk) 03:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
I think this is Mr Larkin or someone who works for him. Arom1221 ( talk) 03:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
So is there anyway it can be worded to sound more neutral. This is the 1st edit I have ever made on wikipedia Arom1221 ( talk) 03:58, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Ok i found a way to rewrite this so its under the guidelines
Arom1221 (
talk) 04:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a
reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of
verifiability. See
Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —
Jeff
G. ツ
04:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello Arom1221. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 04:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did with
this edit to
Barry Larkin, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. —
Jeff
G. ツ
02:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Indrian ( talk) 21:48, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Barry Larkin. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) ( talk) 21:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
To be clear - the edit warring isn't the only issue here; the information you continue to add is a violation of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If the information is restored you will be blocked from editing, and if you switch to an IP address to make the edits it will be blocked as well. Wikipedia is not the venue to play out your personal vendetta against Mr. Larkin. -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 22:12, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
The info I have provided is very true and accurate. Ill update it with more details if needed but you all act like what I'm posting im lying about.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Barry Larkin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Barry Larkin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Falcon8765
(TALK)
03:33, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
What I have posted i have told the truth and posted my proof yet this cant be added. Why are you all working for Mr larkin or something. Arom1221 ( talk) 03:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
I have posted Facts and this is not my opinion on Mr Larkin. If it was my opinion I would go into more details. This made the major paper in Cincinnati. Arom1221 ( talk) 03:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
I think this is Mr Larkin or someone who works for him. Arom1221 ( talk) 03:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
So is there anyway it can be worded to sound more neutral. This is the 1st edit I have ever made on wikipedia Arom1221 ( talk) 03:58, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Ok i found a way to rewrite this so its under the guidelines
Arom1221 (
talk) 04:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a
reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of
verifiability. See
Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —
Jeff
G. ツ
04:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello Arom1221. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 04:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)