![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with Anupmehra. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive9 |
All Pages: | ... (up to 100) |
209.188.118.107 ( talk) 19:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Anupmehra,
Thank you for the time you took to review my submission. I think you are correct that there are not very many third party sources written about Indian House. I have never been very much about seeking publicity. We do have a number of scholarly reviews about our recordings which are listed, and a few more which are not listed. I haven't bothered to attempt to re-write my submission according to Wikipedia guidelines, because if there are not enough notable sources, no amount of re-writing will add to those sources. (At the request of the late Dr. William Sturtevant I did write an introductory section about Indian music recordings for the Smithsonian's Handbook of North American Indians, but this is slated for the Index volume of the series, which will be the last volume published, whenever published; it is not about Indian House, but about all music recordings.)
Again, thank you for the time you took to review my submission. For your stated reason of not enough published third party sources about Indian House, please withdraw my submission.
With best regards,
209.188.118.107 ( talk) 19:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Tony Isaacs 209.188.118.107 ( talk)
Hi!
I appreciate the concern regarding my username. Gabriel Polsky Productions is a sole proprietorship run by myself, Gabe Polsky. As such, I am the only person using this account. For the sake of ease, can I please keep my username as is?
Thank you for your time!
Best,
Gabe Polsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabriel Polsky Productions ( talk • contribs) 20:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
The link i left for Jennifer Hudson was marked as spam. Can i know why?
The page i linked to: http://weightlosscelebrities.com/jennifer-hudson/ is certainly not what you describe it to be - no ads nor anything suspicious, but an article that covers Jennifer's weight loss, diet and exercise routine. Perhaps you should review the other references on that page, because there are many that are *less appropriate* than what i referenced.
Can you please review it once again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.53.44.2 ( talk) 20:43, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
I am thankful for you for correcting and showing the correct way of editing done by me. I am sorry, I was really very aggressive and it is but natural that I was so inclined toward DB article that it looked like doing partisan activity. I being declared DB, I have disadvantage and I should have taken extra care of that factor before doing any editing that I should avoid making comments which depict doing favours without any Wikipedian proof, and now after succession controversy, I should have learnt that I don't have now any rights to do good faith editing on DB articles at least.
Aggressive actions by a specific editor has given me opportunity to learn the fact, but I also thanks him also for teaching me a lesson, but let me warned him that Wiki have system and fellow editors like you, Quwertis, occultzone , any many more including admin involved, will not allow him the activity which he started doing aggressively after 29th Nov, deleting well sourced material of his dislike and adding material of own controlled partisan websites ofhis favour.-- Md iet ( talk) 04:36, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Sorry dear, I can't 'let always' you 'know' on the activities I am most bothered, and which a specific fellow doing purposely. I made a general request in good faith as per above and got advices, which I respect as a true Wiki fan and will see that if wiki don't recommend it, it is not to be done, if it is violating Wiki rules than it is not to be further disobeyed.
My request to my fellow Wikipedia editors is just watch this fellow X, he is doing aggressive editing now as he got chance to do as per his will. He has specific motives which were discussed at length during various complains and discussions. Deletion of material of his disliking, phrasing the material with his importance, putting them in lead Para, adding material of his choice even from sources which are purely from the websites of his Kingman are a normal practice for him. He has made target of Shia Islam to achieve his individual egoistic agenda, and made comments which are derogatory and not at all acceptable to Shia as a whole, and used a platform like Wikipedia. He has used all the means he can to achieve his agenda.
All the system, societies, religions has some short comings, some are specific and some are common. Efforts to be done for positive improvement but not to dishonour or make issue out of it in neutral platform like Wiki. They have finally come to that tactics and got an issue in hand which is a real issue and definitely need attention but in a democratic manner. This fellow got sympathy and found a way to get trapped others editors who have deep knowledge of subject. There is no real opposition, hence no democracy, no objections. Now some third party editors like you have all responsibility to make him abide the Wiki rules and not to allow use Wiki for his personnel ambitions.-- Md iet ( talk) 10:45, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Not sure Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epistructural tension should have been closed. Speedy keep #1 (for when the nom withdraws) is only valid when there are no other deletion arguments. czar ⨹ 02:09, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear Anup,Subject to your review- Could you please consider moving this draft /info/en/?search=Draft:Vappala_Balachandran into the Article space.Reaching out.Thanks.( Suntug11 ( talk) 02:56, 5 December 2014 (UTC)).
Thank You so much for this.( Suntug11 ( talk) 10:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC))
Why to go by neutral point if the info is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angeldeviltanya ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear Anupmehra, Thank you for your answer about my request to update the edit-protected area of the reflist of the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurtosis . Actually I do not know how to edit the protected area reflist and I do not want to do attempts without permission. If I understand well, my rights does not permit such an edition (or I do not remember). If my right permits the update, please just recall me how to change reflist. Anyway, here are the details for the talk. About the actual ref 4: Pearson, K. (1929). "Editorial note to ‘Inequalities for moments of frequency functions and for various statistical constants’". Biometrika 21 (1–4): 370–375. doi:10.1093/biomet/21.1-4.361 (1) The toc of Biometrika 1929, 21(1-4) is at: http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/1-4.toc I failed to find this paper of Pearson on this toc, and I failed to find it with ZMATH. The doi redirects to the paper of Joanes and Gill, "The Statistician" 1998, vol 47, part 1, pp. 183-189. Indeed it deals with skeweness and kurtosis, but it does not cite Pearson and it does not give a general proof of the inequality valid for any random variable distribution. Anyway there is disagreement between the doi and the ref to Pearson. (2) The 2013 paper is publicly available on http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.skewness.html (see ref. 2: "download pdf paper"): see the result top of p.3 and eq. 6. The proof of the more general inequality for random vectors is in my paper: "From Shape Similarity to Shape Complementarity: Toward a Docking Theory." J. Math. Chem. 2004,35[3],147-158. (DOI 10.1023/B:JOMC.0000033252.59423.6b), see eq. A10 in the appendix. I cannot load it on the web due to the copyright. Only one assumption: the moments of order 4 must exist (so, it is not restricted to samples). I do not claim to have discovered the sharp lower bound of the kurtosis, even in its more general form, and I do not care if my 2013 paper is not cited. However I was the first to mention it on the Wikipedia page, and at first glance my own proof seems to be original. I just say that the reader should be directed to a proof valid in all cases, e.g. via a valid source. If the ref works only for samples, the text should be updated accordingly. To conclude, I give you the hint for the full proof for random variables (for vectors, see the 2004 paper), available to anybody aware of math expectations: X1 and X2 are random variables, translate X2, calculate the translation minimizing the variance of the squared difference of the random variables, and look at the expression of the minimized variance: it should be a non negative quantity, hence the desired inequality. Please feel free to email me if you like. Best regards. Michel Petitjean http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html E-mail: petitjean.chiral@gmail.com (preferred) or michel.petitjean@univ-paris-diderot.fr — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.194.29.18 ( talk) 16:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
I pasted the wrong doi of ref.4 (mouse catched the doi of the line above). In fact the Editorial is appended to the paper of Shohat. I cancel my request. Please accept my apologies for the inconvenience caused. Thanks for your patience. Michel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.194.29.18 ( talk) 14:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for making me a account on Wikipedia i do appreciate it also how do you get userboxs i want to put some on my user page its kinda empty.Thanks! Tru3 Republic ( talk) 22:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Tru3 Republic
Hey,
If you recall, we spoke a few nights ago regarding The Cinema's band page on wiki. You provided some suggestions on how I could get the page approved, and mentioned that you could review it for me once I was finished. I've made some changes, and would like for you to take a look at it when you get a chance. Here's the link: /info/en/?search=Draft:The_Cinema
In addition, if the band page is appropriate, would you mind reviewing a second page for the band's first album? Here's a link for that page: /info/en/?search=Draft:My_Blood_Is_Full_of_Airplanes
Please let me know once you've reviewed them. I appreciate your feedback and help!
-Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.134.41 ( talk) 04:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey Anup,
Have you had a chance to review The Cinema's pages? If not, it's alright. I just wanted to touch base. Hope to hear from you soon!
-Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.134.41 ( talk) 22:54, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Metacompiler. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: RfC: How should we color Kansas? Prcc27 ( talk) 05:48, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Helped
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Narkatiaganj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Anup Mehra,
I think I was writing about my self to let other know who I am. I was not being biased as it said in the policies. I was writing the actual facts. I had not completed the article yet. I was going to continue editing it tomorrow. Please let me know how can I do the same.
Rohitrehan ( talk) 15:49, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Rohit Rehan
Hello. I'm not having the greatest experience as a Wikipedia editor, and I'm hoping to learn. I just tried to pursue more information using using the help IRC Channel, but it didn't seem to be working on my end (or I just couldn't figure it out), so I thought I'd try writing you personally. I've just had an article deleted on which I've participated as editor ( Tyler Turkle), and I'm trying to understand the process a little better. Thanks for passing along the "Other Stuff Exists" article. I was helpful and makes sense. That said, there really does seem to be a LOT of "other" stuff existing out there. Can you help me understand the process of identification for articles flagged for deletion? Is the fact that special attention was drawn to this article just a case being very unlucky? Did the editor who used the word "hoax" ultimately succeed in removing the article for other more personal reasons? Lastly, assuming I'm able to find new or more citations, is it worth the time to try and repost the article? Thanks. Mycotn ( talk) 12:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I am not as experienced as you are on Wikipedia but i myself have some knowledge about the articles here, Thanks to my journey with this encyclopedia for just more than 1 year. Well, i saw you nominating the article Untitled Sukumar project for deletion because of which i could actually come to know about WP:NFF. I used to think always that when a film is launched, regular shooting would commence as on the day of launch, Production begins. That assumption turned wrong today because of your edit. Thus i would not mind the article being deleted as per you or redirected to Sukumar as per Kailash29792. But i would prefer the latter, as i neither used any non reliable sources nor it was of promotional or advertising nature. Proceed with the move you feel the best in this case after reading this message. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 10:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Succession box. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!! |
Hello Anupmehra, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message. |
Dear Sir , Kindly let me know if my article is now good enough to be approved , i have updated many published link in newspaper and also updated the old self references ! Awaiting you reply. ````
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
Thanks a lot Sir and also Merry Christmas and a Prosperous Year 2015 !!! aks 10:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC) |
Hi... I understand the page Kalyug (2014) is marked AfD. Do let me know how what it needs to meet wiki standards. Cheers, SR.
How do i add photo's of "SUREKHA YADAV" india's first woman railway driver, into wikipedia ? http://images.idiva.com/media/photogallery/2013/Mar/surekha_yadav.jpg She drove the first "Ladies Special" local train on 16th April 2000, for Central Railways (set record) and then, She drove Deccan Queen on 6th march 2011 (set record) from Pune to CST and was greeted by the then mayor Shraddha Jadhav, at CST, the headquarter of Central Railway zone.
Born on 2nd September 1965, to sonabai and Ramchandra Bhosale in Satara city of Maharashtra. Her younger siblings being Sanjay, Sujata, Ujwala and Deepak Bhosale. She completed schooling from Saint Paul convent High School, Satara. Got married to Shankar Yadav, who is an officer in the Maharashtra State Government. They have 2 sons, Ajinkya (1991) and Ajitesh (1994), both students of Engineering in Mumbai University.
reference = ishare.rediff.com/video/cricket/first-motorwoman-surekha-yadav-pilots-deccan-queen/2880735
permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
.
Anupmehra -
Let's talk!
11:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I had put up the links on MahaKumbh TV serial, which was related to MahaKumbh TV Series and providing original information with About Us, Privacy Policy and Contact Us. I am not doing any type of spamming here. I am not a spammer at all. I am providing related information at the original page of that. If you don't allow it, then what is the use of Wikipedia? It's not a useful site then for sure. You are avoiding the main site of the Serial. I will not use Wikipedia again, after this disgusting removals of my links. Also, I will tell many Internet Marketers for not to use Wikipedia for providing reference links here. Seriously, don't know who made you editor here! :( Thanks! Have a Great Day ahead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivek.jain77711 ( talk • contribs) 15:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rotimi Amaechi. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Your recent review at Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany and the Holocaust wasn't the right choice. A quick google search shows that the statement removed is true and not 'trolling'. If you don't know, don't review it (there's a reason it was in the pile for 5 hours). -- Everyone Dies In the End ( talk) 15:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Anup, perhaps I am mistaking you for someone else... did we meet in the Bengali WP conference? -- AmritasyaPutra T 03:45, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaalin Zoya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mollywood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello Anupmehra: My username is "Snoddoggy" and last year you helped me with my Wikipedia article "CrownPeak".
It has been almost exactly a year and I haven't made any changes since (although few other editors have made minor changes) and I want to update the article. I plan to significantly edit and expand the article. I want to make these major changes in good faith, however, so I want to know how best to do that without running afoul of editors. A few questions:
- How much content do I need to add to the article to escape the "stub" category?
- Initially I plan to make all of my edits in my personal "Sandbox". When I am ready may I ask you to review the updates in my Sandbox? I figure that will be the best way to make sure all of my edits are formatted correctly for objectivity, grammar, etc.
- Once you have approved the changes in Sandbox, do I ask you to promote the updated article or should I simply copy/paste the Sandbox edits over the article in Prod?
Please give me any other tips on how to make significant article changes in good faith. Thank you -- Snoddoggy ( talk) 18:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
you are writing civilian death in soldier casualties without any reference. any reason ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajkumararslan ( talk • contribs) 16:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, regarding my suggestion of including the information from tattoos, I must make clear that there are many reliable sources about his tattoos (see below). The fact that I have referred this primary source ( http://neymarjr.org/private/tattoos-2/) is because it is really the only page I found that gathered all information from his tattoos in one page, since the reliable sources just have part of the information, so it is spread around a lot. Check some links below with information regarding his tattoos or the importance his fans give to them. English: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/fashion-and-style/10891748/World-Cup-The-10-best-tattooed-footballers.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2529923/Neymar-wowed-crowd-celebrated-like-Gareth-Bale-charity-game.html http://www.bbc.com/news/world-28019011 Brazilian: http://globoesporte.globo.com/boleirama/noticia/2014/01/gerente-de-loja-em-santos-inspirou-primeira-tatuagem-de-neymar.html http://www.mundodeportivo.com/20141209/fc-barcelona/nuevo-tatuaje-para-neymar-jr_54421237800.html http://globoesporte.globo.com/boleirama/noticia/2013/01/atacante-neymar-faz-nova-tatuagem-mas-desenho-ainda-e-misterio.html http://globoesporte.globo.com/sp/santos-e-regiao/vanessa-faro/platb/2012/05/16/nova-tatuagem-de-neymar/ http://globoesporte.globo.com/radicais/surfe/noticia/2014/01/neymar-imita-tatuagem-e-pedro-scooby-aprova-achei-muito-maneiro.html also in many other languages, like for example Hungarian: http://www.samsungsport.hu/kulfoldi-labdarugas/20131226/neymar-uj-tetkokat-csinaltatott-mar-a-nyaka-is-ki-van-varrva-kep http://www.nemzetisport.hu/sportszelep/neymar-a-hatara-tetovalta-boldogsagat-2250823 http://www.origo.hu/foci-vb-2014/light/20140702-vb-tetkok.html Cheers, Luisa 86.56.169.70 ( talk) 19:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, several things: please don't report usernames to UAA unless the account needs to be blocked immediately. In the same vein, UAA and {{ username concern}} are usually either/or—if its' serious enough for UAA, there's no need for the template; if it's open to discussion, UAA is usually unnecessary. Please don't report long-established editors, especially when that editor has made thousands of constructive edits and is clearly not promoting a company. Please make sure the username actually represents a company before reporting—the issue with corporate usernames is not the name itself but that we do not allow promotion or role accounts. Finally, please don't report accounts that have yet to edit unless the username is grossly offensive. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you are fine :) I just went through this page bit ago and found that you tagged it for afd. I think it is not quite Notable enough to write as alone article. Marcus Luttrell has its own coverage that doesn't relate to Gulab khan, because Gulab khan in particular did not receive any good coverage to pass WP:BLP in particular. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 12:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chris Kyle. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
You had voted on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering in India, 7 days gone. Had you seen the new changes and two other delete votes were withdrawn? Bladesmulti ( talk) 06:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Anup,
Thank you for adding your comments and thoughts on my article on Soumya Jain.
I have known Soumya Jain in a professional capacity for the past 5 years, and contrary to what you wrote:
- She has been quoted by many renowned publications and writers on the web. I have copied urls to some of these articles below for your perusal.
- There are many articles which are published in print magazines such as Fast Company, Business India, Blackbook India, Pitch and Retailer, but do not have an e-version of those articles. I can work on collecting those articles and scan them and send to you via email if required.
- She has been asked to contribute to Government affiliated journals, such as The Diplomatist
- She has spoken at conferences and taught at many educational institutions as guest lecturer, institutes such as University of Delhi and Mudra Institute of Communications
In a nutshell, I have known luxury industry professionals to have quoted her or ask for her advise when it comes to investing in the luxury industry or laying down new strategies for their products/services, which is a notable achievement. Publications such as Business Today, Mint Indulge and many more reliable sources have significant coverage on Soumya's work and expertise.
Apart from that, it would be great to know how else I could validate this post in a stronger way, since I am also a fairly new contributor on Wikipedia and working my way around it. Thanks!
http://yourstory.com//2013/04/luxuryfacts-com-an-online-repository-on-all-things-about-luxury/
http://www.livemint.com/Leisure/5lPrO3AGNgnqwzkD1mDfLJ/The-Luxe-Factors.html
http://www.fashionunited.in/news/fashion/interview-the-luxury-market-in-india-030920124161
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/263797/chunky-abstract-bold-in.html
http://www.youthincmag.com/2011/12/01/in-the-lap-of-luxury/
-- Ag.gautam ( talk) 20:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Manasa is my friend, but neither she or me are interested in creating wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SnazzyStar Joel ( talk • contribs) 07:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Devopam ( talk) 09:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gun show loophole. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Anupmehra,
Thank you for reviewing our submission (Engineering Institute of Technology). I have since edited the sources section as request and would like to ask that you complete a second review of the page.
/info/en/?search=Draft:Engineering_Institute_of_Technology.
Many thanks
OJCASK ( talk) 06:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there Anapmehra, I had a new page up for deletion. I have added links to references and news items and wondered if there is anything else I need to place in there? Thanks, Gazza. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gazza4444 ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
There was no need for that edit summary. You had been "reviewing" the article for 17 hours. By that point its quite obvious you wandered off (probably went to WP:TODO) and forgot about it, so I was placing it back in the review queue so someone would actually come by and review it. No need to get in a huff. EoRdE6( Come Talk to Me!) 22:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Thanks you. Ramyakr ( talk) 15:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC) |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with Anupmehra. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive9 |
All Pages: | ... (up to 100) |
209.188.118.107 ( talk) 19:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Anupmehra,
Thank you for the time you took to review my submission. I think you are correct that there are not very many third party sources written about Indian House. I have never been very much about seeking publicity. We do have a number of scholarly reviews about our recordings which are listed, and a few more which are not listed. I haven't bothered to attempt to re-write my submission according to Wikipedia guidelines, because if there are not enough notable sources, no amount of re-writing will add to those sources. (At the request of the late Dr. William Sturtevant I did write an introductory section about Indian music recordings for the Smithsonian's Handbook of North American Indians, but this is slated for the Index volume of the series, which will be the last volume published, whenever published; it is not about Indian House, but about all music recordings.)
Again, thank you for the time you took to review my submission. For your stated reason of not enough published third party sources about Indian House, please withdraw my submission.
With best regards,
209.188.118.107 ( talk) 19:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Tony Isaacs 209.188.118.107 ( talk)
Hi!
I appreciate the concern regarding my username. Gabriel Polsky Productions is a sole proprietorship run by myself, Gabe Polsky. As such, I am the only person using this account. For the sake of ease, can I please keep my username as is?
Thank you for your time!
Best,
Gabe Polsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabriel Polsky Productions ( talk • contribs) 20:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
The link i left for Jennifer Hudson was marked as spam. Can i know why?
The page i linked to: http://weightlosscelebrities.com/jennifer-hudson/ is certainly not what you describe it to be - no ads nor anything suspicious, but an article that covers Jennifer's weight loss, diet and exercise routine. Perhaps you should review the other references on that page, because there are many that are *less appropriate* than what i referenced.
Can you please review it once again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.53.44.2 ( talk) 20:43, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
I am thankful for you for correcting and showing the correct way of editing done by me. I am sorry, I was really very aggressive and it is but natural that I was so inclined toward DB article that it looked like doing partisan activity. I being declared DB, I have disadvantage and I should have taken extra care of that factor before doing any editing that I should avoid making comments which depict doing favours without any Wikipedian proof, and now after succession controversy, I should have learnt that I don't have now any rights to do good faith editing on DB articles at least.
Aggressive actions by a specific editor has given me opportunity to learn the fact, but I also thanks him also for teaching me a lesson, but let me warned him that Wiki have system and fellow editors like you, Quwertis, occultzone , any many more including admin involved, will not allow him the activity which he started doing aggressively after 29th Nov, deleting well sourced material of his dislike and adding material of own controlled partisan websites ofhis favour.-- Md iet ( talk) 04:36, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Sorry dear, I can't 'let always' you 'know' on the activities I am most bothered, and which a specific fellow doing purposely. I made a general request in good faith as per above and got advices, which I respect as a true Wiki fan and will see that if wiki don't recommend it, it is not to be done, if it is violating Wiki rules than it is not to be further disobeyed.
My request to my fellow Wikipedia editors is just watch this fellow X, he is doing aggressive editing now as he got chance to do as per his will. He has specific motives which were discussed at length during various complains and discussions. Deletion of material of his disliking, phrasing the material with his importance, putting them in lead Para, adding material of his choice even from sources which are purely from the websites of his Kingman are a normal practice for him. He has made target of Shia Islam to achieve his individual egoistic agenda, and made comments which are derogatory and not at all acceptable to Shia as a whole, and used a platform like Wikipedia. He has used all the means he can to achieve his agenda.
All the system, societies, religions has some short comings, some are specific and some are common. Efforts to be done for positive improvement but not to dishonour or make issue out of it in neutral platform like Wiki. They have finally come to that tactics and got an issue in hand which is a real issue and definitely need attention but in a democratic manner. This fellow got sympathy and found a way to get trapped others editors who have deep knowledge of subject. There is no real opposition, hence no democracy, no objections. Now some third party editors like you have all responsibility to make him abide the Wiki rules and not to allow use Wiki for his personnel ambitions.-- Md iet ( talk) 10:45, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Not sure Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epistructural tension should have been closed. Speedy keep #1 (for when the nom withdraws) is only valid when there are no other deletion arguments. czar ⨹ 02:09, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear Anup,Subject to your review- Could you please consider moving this draft /info/en/?search=Draft:Vappala_Balachandran into the Article space.Reaching out.Thanks.( Suntug11 ( talk) 02:56, 5 December 2014 (UTC)).
Thank You so much for this.( Suntug11 ( talk) 10:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC))
Why to go by neutral point if the info is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angeldeviltanya ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear Anupmehra, Thank you for your answer about my request to update the edit-protected area of the reflist of the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurtosis . Actually I do not know how to edit the protected area reflist and I do not want to do attempts without permission. If I understand well, my rights does not permit such an edition (or I do not remember). If my right permits the update, please just recall me how to change reflist. Anyway, here are the details for the talk. About the actual ref 4: Pearson, K. (1929). "Editorial note to ‘Inequalities for moments of frequency functions and for various statistical constants’". Biometrika 21 (1–4): 370–375. doi:10.1093/biomet/21.1-4.361 (1) The toc of Biometrika 1929, 21(1-4) is at: http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/1-4.toc I failed to find this paper of Pearson on this toc, and I failed to find it with ZMATH. The doi redirects to the paper of Joanes and Gill, "The Statistician" 1998, vol 47, part 1, pp. 183-189. Indeed it deals with skeweness and kurtosis, but it does not cite Pearson and it does not give a general proof of the inequality valid for any random variable distribution. Anyway there is disagreement between the doi and the ref to Pearson. (2) The 2013 paper is publicly available on http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.skewness.html (see ref. 2: "download pdf paper"): see the result top of p.3 and eq. 6. The proof of the more general inequality for random vectors is in my paper: "From Shape Similarity to Shape Complementarity: Toward a Docking Theory." J. Math. Chem. 2004,35[3],147-158. (DOI 10.1023/B:JOMC.0000033252.59423.6b), see eq. A10 in the appendix. I cannot load it on the web due to the copyright. Only one assumption: the moments of order 4 must exist (so, it is not restricted to samples). I do not claim to have discovered the sharp lower bound of the kurtosis, even in its more general form, and I do not care if my 2013 paper is not cited. However I was the first to mention it on the Wikipedia page, and at first glance my own proof seems to be original. I just say that the reader should be directed to a proof valid in all cases, e.g. via a valid source. If the ref works only for samples, the text should be updated accordingly. To conclude, I give you the hint for the full proof for random variables (for vectors, see the 2004 paper), available to anybody aware of math expectations: X1 and X2 are random variables, translate X2, calculate the translation minimizing the variance of the squared difference of the random variables, and look at the expression of the minimized variance: it should be a non negative quantity, hence the desired inequality. Please feel free to email me if you like. Best regards. Michel Petitjean http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html E-mail: petitjean.chiral@gmail.com (preferred) or michel.petitjean@univ-paris-diderot.fr — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.194.29.18 ( talk) 16:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
I pasted the wrong doi of ref.4 (mouse catched the doi of the line above). In fact the Editorial is appended to the paper of Shohat. I cancel my request. Please accept my apologies for the inconvenience caused. Thanks for your patience. Michel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.194.29.18 ( talk) 14:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for making me a account on Wikipedia i do appreciate it also how do you get userboxs i want to put some on my user page its kinda empty.Thanks! Tru3 Republic ( talk) 22:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Tru3 Republic
Hey,
If you recall, we spoke a few nights ago regarding The Cinema's band page on wiki. You provided some suggestions on how I could get the page approved, and mentioned that you could review it for me once I was finished. I've made some changes, and would like for you to take a look at it when you get a chance. Here's the link: /info/en/?search=Draft:The_Cinema
In addition, if the band page is appropriate, would you mind reviewing a second page for the band's first album? Here's a link for that page: /info/en/?search=Draft:My_Blood_Is_Full_of_Airplanes
Please let me know once you've reviewed them. I appreciate your feedback and help!
-Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.134.41 ( talk) 04:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey Anup,
Have you had a chance to review The Cinema's pages? If not, it's alright. I just wanted to touch base. Hope to hear from you soon!
-Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.134.41 ( talk) 22:54, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Metacompiler. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: RfC: How should we color Kansas? Prcc27 ( talk) 05:48, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Helped
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Narkatiaganj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Anup Mehra,
I think I was writing about my self to let other know who I am. I was not being biased as it said in the policies. I was writing the actual facts. I had not completed the article yet. I was going to continue editing it tomorrow. Please let me know how can I do the same.
Rohitrehan ( talk) 15:49, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Rohit Rehan
Hello. I'm not having the greatest experience as a Wikipedia editor, and I'm hoping to learn. I just tried to pursue more information using using the help IRC Channel, but it didn't seem to be working on my end (or I just couldn't figure it out), so I thought I'd try writing you personally. I've just had an article deleted on which I've participated as editor ( Tyler Turkle), and I'm trying to understand the process a little better. Thanks for passing along the "Other Stuff Exists" article. I was helpful and makes sense. That said, there really does seem to be a LOT of "other" stuff existing out there. Can you help me understand the process of identification for articles flagged for deletion? Is the fact that special attention was drawn to this article just a case being very unlucky? Did the editor who used the word "hoax" ultimately succeed in removing the article for other more personal reasons? Lastly, assuming I'm able to find new or more citations, is it worth the time to try and repost the article? Thanks. Mycotn ( talk) 12:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I am not as experienced as you are on Wikipedia but i myself have some knowledge about the articles here, Thanks to my journey with this encyclopedia for just more than 1 year. Well, i saw you nominating the article Untitled Sukumar project for deletion because of which i could actually come to know about WP:NFF. I used to think always that when a film is launched, regular shooting would commence as on the day of launch, Production begins. That assumption turned wrong today because of your edit. Thus i would not mind the article being deleted as per you or redirected to Sukumar as per Kailash29792. But i would prefer the latter, as i neither used any non reliable sources nor it was of promotional or advertising nature. Proceed with the move you feel the best in this case after reading this message. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 10:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Succession box. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!! |
Hello Anupmehra, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message. |
Dear Sir , Kindly let me know if my article is now good enough to be approved , i have updated many published link in newspaper and also updated the old self references ! Awaiting you reply. ````
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
Thanks a lot Sir and also Merry Christmas and a Prosperous Year 2015 !!! aks 10:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC) |
Hi... I understand the page Kalyug (2014) is marked AfD. Do let me know how what it needs to meet wiki standards. Cheers, SR.
How do i add photo's of "SUREKHA YADAV" india's first woman railway driver, into wikipedia ? http://images.idiva.com/media/photogallery/2013/Mar/surekha_yadav.jpg She drove the first "Ladies Special" local train on 16th April 2000, for Central Railways (set record) and then, She drove Deccan Queen on 6th march 2011 (set record) from Pune to CST and was greeted by the then mayor Shraddha Jadhav, at CST, the headquarter of Central Railway zone.
Born on 2nd September 1965, to sonabai and Ramchandra Bhosale in Satara city of Maharashtra. Her younger siblings being Sanjay, Sujata, Ujwala and Deepak Bhosale. She completed schooling from Saint Paul convent High School, Satara. Got married to Shankar Yadav, who is an officer in the Maharashtra State Government. They have 2 sons, Ajinkya (1991) and Ajitesh (1994), both students of Engineering in Mumbai University.
reference = ishare.rediff.com/video/cricket/first-motorwoman-surekha-yadav-pilots-deccan-queen/2880735
permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
.
Anupmehra -
Let's talk!
11:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I had put up the links on MahaKumbh TV serial, which was related to MahaKumbh TV Series and providing original information with About Us, Privacy Policy and Contact Us. I am not doing any type of spamming here. I am not a spammer at all. I am providing related information at the original page of that. If you don't allow it, then what is the use of Wikipedia? It's not a useful site then for sure. You are avoiding the main site of the Serial. I will not use Wikipedia again, after this disgusting removals of my links. Also, I will tell many Internet Marketers for not to use Wikipedia for providing reference links here. Seriously, don't know who made you editor here! :( Thanks! Have a Great Day ahead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivek.jain77711 ( talk • contribs) 15:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rotimi Amaechi. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Your recent review at Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany and the Holocaust wasn't the right choice. A quick google search shows that the statement removed is true and not 'trolling'. If you don't know, don't review it (there's a reason it was in the pile for 5 hours). -- Everyone Dies In the End ( talk) 15:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Anup, perhaps I am mistaking you for someone else... did we meet in the Bengali WP conference? -- AmritasyaPutra T 03:45, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaalin Zoya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mollywood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello Anupmehra: My username is "Snoddoggy" and last year you helped me with my Wikipedia article "CrownPeak".
It has been almost exactly a year and I haven't made any changes since (although few other editors have made minor changes) and I want to update the article. I plan to significantly edit and expand the article. I want to make these major changes in good faith, however, so I want to know how best to do that without running afoul of editors. A few questions:
- How much content do I need to add to the article to escape the "stub" category?
- Initially I plan to make all of my edits in my personal "Sandbox". When I am ready may I ask you to review the updates in my Sandbox? I figure that will be the best way to make sure all of my edits are formatted correctly for objectivity, grammar, etc.
- Once you have approved the changes in Sandbox, do I ask you to promote the updated article or should I simply copy/paste the Sandbox edits over the article in Prod?
Please give me any other tips on how to make significant article changes in good faith. Thank you -- Snoddoggy ( talk) 18:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
you are writing civilian death in soldier casualties without any reference. any reason ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajkumararslan ( talk • contribs) 16:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, regarding my suggestion of including the information from tattoos, I must make clear that there are many reliable sources about his tattoos (see below). The fact that I have referred this primary source ( http://neymarjr.org/private/tattoos-2/) is because it is really the only page I found that gathered all information from his tattoos in one page, since the reliable sources just have part of the information, so it is spread around a lot. Check some links below with information regarding his tattoos or the importance his fans give to them. English: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/fashion-and-style/10891748/World-Cup-The-10-best-tattooed-footballers.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2529923/Neymar-wowed-crowd-celebrated-like-Gareth-Bale-charity-game.html http://www.bbc.com/news/world-28019011 Brazilian: http://globoesporte.globo.com/boleirama/noticia/2014/01/gerente-de-loja-em-santos-inspirou-primeira-tatuagem-de-neymar.html http://www.mundodeportivo.com/20141209/fc-barcelona/nuevo-tatuaje-para-neymar-jr_54421237800.html http://globoesporte.globo.com/boleirama/noticia/2013/01/atacante-neymar-faz-nova-tatuagem-mas-desenho-ainda-e-misterio.html http://globoesporte.globo.com/sp/santos-e-regiao/vanessa-faro/platb/2012/05/16/nova-tatuagem-de-neymar/ http://globoesporte.globo.com/radicais/surfe/noticia/2014/01/neymar-imita-tatuagem-e-pedro-scooby-aprova-achei-muito-maneiro.html also in many other languages, like for example Hungarian: http://www.samsungsport.hu/kulfoldi-labdarugas/20131226/neymar-uj-tetkokat-csinaltatott-mar-a-nyaka-is-ki-van-varrva-kep http://www.nemzetisport.hu/sportszelep/neymar-a-hatara-tetovalta-boldogsagat-2250823 http://www.origo.hu/foci-vb-2014/light/20140702-vb-tetkok.html Cheers, Luisa 86.56.169.70 ( talk) 19:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, several things: please don't report usernames to UAA unless the account needs to be blocked immediately. In the same vein, UAA and {{ username concern}} are usually either/or—if its' serious enough for UAA, there's no need for the template; if it's open to discussion, UAA is usually unnecessary. Please don't report long-established editors, especially when that editor has made thousands of constructive edits and is clearly not promoting a company. Please make sure the username actually represents a company before reporting—the issue with corporate usernames is not the name itself but that we do not allow promotion or role accounts. Finally, please don't report accounts that have yet to edit unless the username is grossly offensive. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you are fine :) I just went through this page bit ago and found that you tagged it for afd. I think it is not quite Notable enough to write as alone article. Marcus Luttrell has its own coverage that doesn't relate to Gulab khan, because Gulab khan in particular did not receive any good coverage to pass WP:BLP in particular. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 12:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chris Kyle. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
You had voted on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering in India, 7 days gone. Had you seen the new changes and two other delete votes were withdrawn? Bladesmulti ( talk) 06:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Anup,
Thank you for adding your comments and thoughts on my article on Soumya Jain.
I have known Soumya Jain in a professional capacity for the past 5 years, and contrary to what you wrote:
- She has been quoted by many renowned publications and writers on the web. I have copied urls to some of these articles below for your perusal.
- There are many articles which are published in print magazines such as Fast Company, Business India, Blackbook India, Pitch and Retailer, but do not have an e-version of those articles. I can work on collecting those articles and scan them and send to you via email if required.
- She has been asked to contribute to Government affiliated journals, such as The Diplomatist
- She has spoken at conferences and taught at many educational institutions as guest lecturer, institutes such as University of Delhi and Mudra Institute of Communications
In a nutshell, I have known luxury industry professionals to have quoted her or ask for her advise when it comes to investing in the luxury industry or laying down new strategies for their products/services, which is a notable achievement. Publications such as Business Today, Mint Indulge and many more reliable sources have significant coverage on Soumya's work and expertise.
Apart from that, it would be great to know how else I could validate this post in a stronger way, since I am also a fairly new contributor on Wikipedia and working my way around it. Thanks!
http://yourstory.com//2013/04/luxuryfacts-com-an-online-repository-on-all-things-about-luxury/
http://www.livemint.com/Leisure/5lPrO3AGNgnqwzkD1mDfLJ/The-Luxe-Factors.html
http://www.fashionunited.in/news/fashion/interview-the-luxury-market-in-india-030920124161
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/263797/chunky-abstract-bold-in.html
http://www.youthincmag.com/2011/12/01/in-the-lap-of-luxury/
-- Ag.gautam ( talk) 20:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Manasa is my friend, but neither she or me are interested in creating wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SnazzyStar Joel ( talk • contribs) 07:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Devopam ( talk) 09:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gun show loophole. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Anupmehra,
Thank you for reviewing our submission (Engineering Institute of Technology). I have since edited the sources section as request and would like to ask that you complete a second review of the page.
/info/en/?search=Draft:Engineering_Institute_of_Technology.
Many thanks
OJCASK ( talk) 06:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there Anapmehra, I had a new page up for deletion. I have added links to references and news items and wondered if there is anything else I need to place in there? Thanks, Gazza. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gazza4444 ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
There was no need for that edit summary. You had been "reviewing" the article for 17 hours. By that point its quite obvious you wandered off (probably went to WP:TODO) and forgot about it, so I was placing it back in the review queue so someone would actually come by and review it. No need to get in a huff. EoRdE6( Come Talk to Me!) 22:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Thanks you. Ramyakr ( talk) 15:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC) |