This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I just saw that you reverted my revert with the summary "this shouldn't have been reverted", and would appreciate your reasoning for this. I reverted it because it appeared to me that somebody had part censored an offensive word in a direct quote. Crimsone 23:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Humourous is a mistake, see User:Spellmaster. -- Guinnog 01:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
It is Charles, foo'. Stop reverting my changes as well please, it's getting tedious. HelterSkelter88 00:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
That doesn't mean anything. I've read numerous times he has been known as actor Charles Hawkins, which made me "lol". Also I enjoy keeping that page up to date & informative.
HelterSkelter88
21:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I can't remember, it was about 9 months ago now, when I did the page in the first place. And it's a bit unfair to say that I've not provided a lot for the page because without my input it'll still be a stub, there was absolutely nothing about him on the net really, I had to scour the corners of the net to find anything, really. Also found that picture which is the only one that isn't a promo or TV screenshot. Very unfair remarks. HelterSkelter88 03:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
I actually can't remember now, it was one of the 4 corners of the internet thats all I remember, about 9 months ago... I don't like that picture though to be honest! Interesting that he's sporting Enter Shikari there though, which the BBC now have tipped to be huge this year - unknowns about a year ago. HelterSkelter88 23:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
I see you created the Winehouse songs category. I didn't check, but I assume you created the Winehouse albums category. Instead of the separation, why not a Winehouse Discography category, or a broader Winehouse-related category? Vegasrebel29 04:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
If you need any assistance, let me know. -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 12:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you knew how to ask Wikipedia of an image that could be used as I want to start an article or contribute to one. So, I wondering how you get an image which already isn't on Wikipedia but to get it on. Sounds bizzare but please if you can help it'd be great. Oriana is cool 12:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I must just be quicker and more on the ball than you! (And I knew you'd say something about "crap" as soon as I clicked "Save page"!) - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 23:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
As you are aware, I nominated {{ Greene}} for deletion a couple weeks ago. I have no problem with the outcome, other than I think the "userbox" solution (moving the box from template space to user space) would have been an appropriate result. While a number of comments suggested "userfy", no one offered to have it in their userspace. Today, in reviewing your AfD nom, I came across your " userbox". I'd like to propose userfying the template by replacing it with your box. (I'll also post this comment on the talk page for the template. Agent 86 02:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I just wondered how you know this pornographic film is a spoof of EastEnders (other than the title of the film). If you've seen it (and I hope you haven't) I'd be interested to know in what ways it spoofs EastEnders. If you haven't seen it then we should just say the title of the film spoofs the name of the show, unless you've read about it. I know Nichola Holt's in it. And presumably there's a RearEnders film that came before RearEnders 2. — AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 23:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I just wondered why you removed a BJAODN from the BJAODN. Isn't that what it's for? — AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 23:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Do you WATCH me or something? Because it's getting very tedious you editing all of my edits. Nobody else does. Or do you just happen to have the same sort of interests as me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HelterSkelter88 ( talk • contribs) 00:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
I have noted your concerns over my changes to Michelle McManus' wiki page. I would like to point out that I was very drunk at the time.
By the way, I think someone is pissed off with you, or do you really enjoy nude cycle rides? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.101.131.31 ( talk • contribs) 11:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
Hey,
Sorry about adding the link. I just assumed you were allowed as the Maria Lawson page has 2 external links to fansites. Is it different rules for different pages?
Adi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adi39 ( talk • contribs) 22:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
I apologise for my "vandalism" of the Wikipedia entry on The Rose (song). I did so as I disagree with the overabundant reference to the band Westlife and their version of the song. I feel the page should be more referent to the original Bette Midler version as it is the more popular version and thus is more likely to be sought information about. If you would be willing to add a picture of the Bette Midler record cover and some basic release facts in addition to the Westlife references I will consider the matter resolved and apologize for any problems I may have caused. If you do not see this as a amicable solution to the disagreement then I will seek to edit the page properly myself following the Wikipedia contributions guidelines and forums, thank you. Further correspondance may be sent to the e-mail provided below.
colby989@yahoo.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.112.50.41 ( talk) 23:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC).
Just to piss Majorly off, I'm going to congratulate you first on your RfA! Congrats dude! If you ever need help with the admin tools, feel free to contact me. =) Nishkid 64 01:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Yup, you are now an admin. Congratulations!!! Danny 01:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on your RfA!! Now you have the tools.-- Wikipedier ( talk • contribs) 02:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
I am pleased to let you know that, consensus reached, you are now an Administrator. You should find the following forums useful:
Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge! thanks/ Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 01:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
How come you removed the cast card link on Paul Priestly? arent we allowed to link to these anymore? Gungadin 19:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
cos i donnt no what u want cos i told u where it is, i didnt upload it i just no where it is on teh internet. Lilyfan87 19:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Just received your message about someone editing wikipedia. If you ban this range, a large network will be affected, and I will be forced to have your administrative powers removed since you are now ON NOTICE. Do not ban this IP range, multiple users will be affected.
I just verified this information, and it appears that you are overstepping your bounds as an administrator, something I do NOT take lightly. I know many people who use wiki, and you are not the be all end all. You may want to review policies before you ban someone, especially in this case, where you will affect people who have done nothing wrong.
I quote from the message you sent: Repeated changing of English when you have been asked to cease doing it may be seen as vandalism.
However, there is NOTHING in the rules that states you are empowered to ban someone for this. Further, it specifically states, under "What vandalism is NOT":
Stubbornness
Some users cannot come to agreement with others who are willing to talk to them about an editing issue, and repeatedly make changes opposed by everyone else. This is regrettable - you may wish to see our dispute resolution pages to get help. However, this is not "vandalism" and should not be dealt with as such.
That said, DO NOT BAN THE IP. I WILL DISPUTE IT AND HAVE YOUR POWERS AS AN ADMIN REVOKED POST HASTE DUE TO ABUSE AND INABILITY TO PROPERLY FOLLOW THE TENETS TO WHICH YOU AGREED TO.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.176.167.204 ( talk) 06:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC).
Sonia Fowler has been "vprotected" - could you change it to "sprotected", like Phil and Ben, please? I don't know the difference but I think the "sprotected" banner makes it clearer... - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 20:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Type "Este usuário é um [[project:administrator|administrador]] na [[:en:|Wikipédia em inglês]] e está aqui para fazer pequenas correções. Ele não fala português" here. Greets, Slade ( The Joker) 15:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Recently me and my boyfriend were discussing what turns each other on. We had a discussion of all the usual fantasies, but his latest one made me feel sick - he said he wanted us to have sex in our unwashed underwear - and I said no. I said it would pose health risks, but he laughed it off as "patent nonsense".
Every time we have sex now he keeps demanding we do it, and I've told him no countless times, but he still insists its good. He even said to me "Life is better when your undies stink!" I said "What???" and told him no way, we're not doing it.
How do I convince him that his suggestion is very risky (in health terms) - as it is, isn't it??
What should I do?? He's still insisting we should do it, claiming "it's sexy and good for you".
Help me!
Marie x
-- Mariemullaghan1982 12:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
... why you're changing all the categories on the EastEnders articles to "DEFAULTSORT"? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 15:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
OK, as you may have seen on my sandbox, I am creating a table of when characters appeared in the show. Is there any way [that you know of] for anyone browsing the table to hide rows [there are so many], so only two or three characters are shown, thus letting them compare which years said characters appeared in? I thought about the hide buttons on navigation templates, but then users would have to click [for example] 148 hide buttons out of 150 rows to compare two rows... Can you help? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 18:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed your participation in AFD nominations of X Factor contestants, and would value your opinions of this. It seems that there is some confusion on whether these individuals are notable or not, and I was wondering whether you could provide some useful input. Thanks. --GW_Simulations User Page | Talk 19:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 22:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey can you help me with something as I'm not too sure how to go about this. A photographer from Flickr has allowed me to use some of his pics on Wiki under a free license. He just said let me know when it's done. So can I just uplaod them now and link to the original @ Flickr on the image page?
Gungadin 16:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Television Barnstar | ||
I would like to award you this television barnstar for your hard work on EastEnders-related articles. - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 19:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC) |
Hi! I'm trying to rewrite the USCA article so that it incorporates the information from all the individual house articles, at which time I'll AfD most of the individual house articles (and TfD the nav template). However, someone AfD'd the Sherman Hall article before I got to it. Can you restore the last content in my user space? Thanks, Αργυριου (talk) 04:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
===> Instead of being a brat and removing the American Idol Season 6 pictures - why don't you try to get them validated and leave them up until they are either validated or denied... The page looks bland with just text in it. Are you going to get sued if the pictures remain? No... so leave them up there. emceepotential 16:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you seem to be very good at formatting userboxes, so I need to request your assistance. I have been trying to reorganize my userboxes, add a few new ones, and get rid of some old ones, but I somehow made a mistake in formatting, and my user page now has userboxes all over the place. If you can spot the problem, please repair it. Thank you very much in advance! aido2002 03:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Why did you choose delete? It is a very helpful template, and I could've written it from scratch as far as anyone knows. I changed it to suit Wikipedia, and it is not broken at all. Please change your vote and ask others to do so as well. Thanks. -- Silva Storm
Thank you for your message
The links on the article Rise Underground shall never be removed again, from now on. I don't have a good reason as why to remove the links.
Thanks
86.3.175.191 —The preceding comment was added by 86.3.175.191 ( talk • contribs) 7 March 2007 19:35 (UTC).
Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:
If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, can you warn this user User talk:9knoxroad or give him a temporary ban, because he seems to be using his account to add nonsense dates to EE articles. Gungadin 22:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
You know what to do. - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 16:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Why did you move Comic Relief does Fame Academy BACK to Comic Relief Does Fame Academy, when it clearly states on the official BBC Fame Academy page that it is "Comic Relief does Fame Academy"? ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/fameacademy). It has already been moved once before. Timclare (talk) (sign here) 16:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Telly addict 21:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for givin me a barnstar-- HW-Barnstar PLS 13:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
I don't know where the title Doing It My Way came from, and I don't know why it's listed on the BBC's charts, but please can you note that Ray Quinn's official website refers to it as a self-titled album, for example on this page. — AnemoneProjectors ( zomg!) 20:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
...find out which articles I have created without going through my 12000+ contributions? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 16:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Having looked over your edits i think you are more than deserving... keep up the good work.-- Jamesmh2006 14:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC) ---- feel free to repay the favour anytime ;P
I was hoping you might take another look at the deletion of Image:A7d65e0e.jpg. You deleted it for not having a copyright tag; however, it looks like it was originally PD-released by the uploader, Rainshine and an anon, 76.173.233.180 simply removed the tag for whatever reason. I wasn't sure if you forgot to check the history or if there was another reason for deleting the image. ShadowHalo 07:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Ben bu topraklarda Şebinkarahisar da yaşıyorum bu topraklada doğdum bu topraklarda büyüdüm ve neler yaşandığını sizlerden daha iyi biliyorum ama benim şehrimin benim yaşadığım yerin tarihinin yanlış taraflı ve lobicilik faaliyetleri içerisinde insalara olmayan bir şeyi sahte, asılsız ve düzmece kaynakları sunarak olmuş gibi göstererek anlatılmasını önleyemiyorum banlanıyorum yada Şebinkarahisar maddesi kilitleriniyor. Sizler bu topraklarda yaşadınızmı da biliyorsunuz ? Ermeni Diasporası tarihi istedikleri gibi yazabilir mi ? Ellerinde yetkileri var diye bu yetkilerini kendi çıkarları için kullanabilirler mi ? Neden tüm Türk sayfalarına sadece asılsız ermeni soykırımı hakkında bilgiler ekliyorlar Vikipedia tarafsız ve özgür ansiklopedi değilmi ? Madem bu admin arkadaşalar çok bilgili neden coğrafi, ekonomik, nüfus bilgilerini insanlar için faydalı olacak bilgileri girmiyorlarda sadece asılsız ermeni soykırımı hakkında bilgiler veriyorlar. BU HAKKI NEREDEN BULUYORLAR ? -- 88.231.200.89 10:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey AnemoneProjectors, thanks for your kind support in my RfB. Sadly, it didn't pass, but I appreciate the support, and I do intend to run again eventually. Happy editing! Majorly (o rly?) 03:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Penis1234-1-.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Is there anything that can be done about this? It's clearly Danh90... - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 14:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back! :) - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 22:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Could you please point me in the right direction to where I can request a policy to be changed? I really don't think that articles about past characters and TV shows that have ended should be written in present tense, and I want to get the policy on that changed. Could you help me out? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 20:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:KitKatFineDarkUK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Bkell ( talk) 17:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
As recommended in the peer review, could you change the refrences on Pauline Fowler to cite news and cite web ones? I would, but I don't really know how it works... can't see what's wrng with them as they are, but apparently it makes a difference. Also, do you know how to do page references for info from books? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 22:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Are these still semi-protected? If not, could you re-protect them? Danh90 is back. - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 11:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I have to go now, but could you take over reverting edits made by (and warning) User:Majormk42, please? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 21:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Can you please move Bree Van de Kamp Hodge to Bree Hodge? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 18:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Could you please protect User talk:Oldman50, please? He's falsifying user warnings etc. again. - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 10:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
It might prokove him to make more accounts, though... - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 10:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at User talk:How3, lol - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 20:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
I notice you added him to the list of minors. is one of these Tony Andrews? [1] [2] Gungadin 19:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm glad you like it. I changed it up a bit since the Green color seemed a bit random (It was only green because it was the color the person I originally supported's clothing was in the official group photo). I changed it to a neutral gray, but if you'd like to add color these eyes are free for use in the box: Image:GrayscaleEyePink.JPG, Image:GrayscaleEyeGreen.JPG, Image:GrayscaleEyeBlue.JPG, and Image:GrayscaleEyeYellow.JPG. FireSpike 00:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm curious to know the source of your information that states this album has been marketed as "self titled" only, as every retailer I have encountered lists it as "Ray Quinn (Doing It My Way)". This includes All Music Guide, Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble, Yahoo Music, and a host of others. It seems to me the correct title for the album would be Ray Quinn (Doing It My Way). ( Mind meal 00:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC))
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Yougivemesomething.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:51, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
I noticed your query on WP:AN/I about a possible copyright infringment about http://www.fonejacker.tv taking information from the Wikipedia article Kayvan Novak (and the IMBD entry) and placing a copyright tag on it claiming it is their own. Just letting you know I contacted the owners of the fonejacker.tv website and hopefully this can be resolved. I'll let you know if anything else develops. Cheers! — Moe ε 23:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
I see you keep reverting my very valid edits and have now seen to that the abi branning page is protected. I cannot see why you deleted what I added to the article, since it was all factually accurate. Now I know in the past I've made some less than sensible edits to certain pages but this time i wasn't taking the piss. What's more, that clown freak (User : can't sleep clown will eat me) bloody blocked me. I think my edits should be restored, either fully or at least partially, SINCE THEY ARE TRUE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.69.102.68 ( talk • contribs) 23:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi AnemoneProjectors,
Just messaging you about the 'speculation/guesswork' I put on the article. I'm happy to have anything I've written edited or removed with good reason. I accept that the thing about the managment of the winning act was a bit too speculative and am okay with seeing that go. However the bit about the judges' vote for which act would go home each week was half fact. It is true that there will need to be a change to the format in this respect because with four voters there can be a tie. Speculation aside, it is perfectly permissible to say that the format will change with regard to the judges' vote without saying that bit about the mentor of the act with the lowest vote losing their right etc. May I re-add that bit about the judges' vote...? without the speculation! hehe
Let me know what you think,
Jonny —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Wiki edit jonny (
talk •
contribs) 14:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC
Hey, do you think it would be worth making a character specific EE template for Pauline? As well as spouses we could have siblings, parents, children etc. That way we could get rid of the family section, but keep the same amount of info in the article. I thought it might be a good solution as the section is getting criticised quite a bit on the FA. Gungadin 19:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Why do you keep on reverting peoples edits? Wikipedia is a website that can edited by all. Fair enough some edits do need reverting, but not all of them. The EastEnders character page is the page you seem to be focusing on more recently. The situation where the dates are being included, and then you revert them, you say is due to a "project consensus." - by who? Its the first i've heard of it and also alot of people judging by the number of times its being edited. Your excuse of it not being needed due to "individual dates is available in the articles for individual characters" can also be said for the ALL the other soaps but yet they have the date information both on the main page, and on the individual pages. Why should the EastEnders page have to be different. It looks stupid as it is now. It SHOULD be changed to include the dates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.207.214.132 ( talk • contribs) 22:37, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Looking for something to do?
WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to
have you on board.
Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing! You recieved this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 22:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC) |
I would urge you to reinstate Category:Men with unusually large penis and submit it to a regular CfD. The category had more than 50 entries. I do not accept your deletion criteria, and I would like the community (of those who would care) to be able to have its say on this. __ meco 06:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
The errors you have just reverted were made unwittingly, so it's good that you caught them! __ meco 14:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Editor meco has posted a statement at 19:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC), on the talk page for the Human penis size article, that you, the nominator for deletion of, Category:Men with unusually large penis, are now his supporter in his effort to include his silly list, "Men famous for their large penis," in the Human penis size article. He is confusing you with AnonEMouse, who mentioned three names of non-porn stars in the category deletion discussion, which, in his confusion, and despertion for support, he takes as an endorsement for inclusion of his list in that article. 72.76.10.245 22:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I wish to add a photo to Will Young's page but cannot understand the instructions! It is a jpeg photo of Will in concert. Can you help? Oyster24 14:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Activites of this user Freedomeagle centered around deleting images, I think we have a griefer since he seems to go around indiscriminately tagging each image he finds. Klichka 19:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I do not understand why you insist on reverting perfectly accurate edits on this page. It is unnecessary and reduces the accuracy of the article. I don't know what point you are trying to make, but if I decided to constantly revert/delete perfectly true information, you wouldn't be best impressed, would you ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.76.37.249 ( talk • contribs) 22:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey, what are your thoughts about the comments on the Pauline talk page? Are you still interested in getting it to FA? and do you think we should try and work all the storylines into the development so we can erase the duplicated information? I asked Trampikey, but he doesnt seem to be active here at the moment and I wanted to get your opinons before going ahead with it. I'm not bothered either way, but i'd be willing to do it if everyone thinks it's a good idea. Gungadin 20:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I changed the picture on the Andy Hunter page, but it was taken of. Why? The picture I put on is so much better then the one there is now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rune Thandy ( talk • contribs) 20:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
In actual fact, a forum is a perfectly reliable source and is of course the consesus of Eastenders viewers since a wide variety of people comment on these forums. Hence it is a representitive sample of the population of Eastenders viewers and is therefore a reliable source. Seeing as I have 9A*s at GCSE, including subjects where you need to use sources, I think I know what I'm talking about, matey.
And WHY THE HELL isn't it important. It is clearly very important and relevant info to be included in the article. You have not justified why it isn't important, you have merely stated it, thinking that just because you are an "administrator" (ie: you spend more time on the internet than most other people) that gives you a right to do whatever you want. How exciting for you !! You don't seem to be able to come up with a logical reason as to why it cannot be inluded, or a logical response to any of my arguments, you just vaguely state, 'it is not important'.
I also noticed you protected the article. How very immature of you. Doing this means you get your own way just because you're a poxy administrator. I noticed on another wikipedia page (about protected pages) it says administrators should NEVER protect pages in an edit war witha non established user, but instead should resolve the issue on a user talk page. You are unable to do this, since you are unable to reasonably justify why my edits can't be included so you resort to the petty action of protecting the page. Well, seeing as you have gone against wikipedia policy by protecting the page in an edit war, I may have to report this to someone higher up, unless you include my edits in some shape or form. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.19.169 ( talk • contribs) 20:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I've just reverted an edit to Cambridge made in your name, stating that "Many cyclists in Cambridge prefer to do so naked". I must say I've never witnessed this phenomenon! I notice you are an administrator, so I assume good faith - I just hope someone doesn't have unauthorised access to your account. All the best, -- Malfidus ~ (talk) 16:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Regarding a few of your edits such as [5], [6], and [7], please take the time to read when a redirect should be properly categorized. Categories of trivial matters are unnecessary, the redirects become italised in the category page and further clutters it. I'm no expert on this guideline (just following protocal) but if you have any questions, please leave a message at WT:CAT-RD instead of my talk page if you still feel that they should be categorized the way you desire them to. Thank you, Lord Sesshomaru 22:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of List of minor EastEnders characters 1990, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mind42.com/wiki/Joan_Garwood. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 17:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
The Sister, Sister twins in EastEnders... strange casting! - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 12:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Meh, the rumour's been trashed, they'll be played by twins from Essex... on a brighter not, Shouty Man Kevin and his kids are leaving, but Diane Parish is going on maternity leave :( - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 14:10, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Probably not CSD material, but do you think Paulo da costa should be taken to AfD? - WarthogDemon 21:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
What are your thoughts on merging past babies/young children into the minor lists, such as Jack Evans and Joe dimarco? I know they appeared over many years, but most of them had no real storylines of their own, so expansion wont ever be possible. There isnt much OOU info that can be included in their articles either. The only exception I can think of is Hassan Osman and maybe Tomas Covelenco (but he's been merged anyway). Gung adin ♦
I thought that screenshots were pictures taken through a didital camera of a television screen of the subject of an article. Could you please tell me how to make a proper screenshot? Kkbhe 07:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Would you have any objections to me including a bullet point list of supporting characters within the list of minor characters? I'd like to make our lists as comprehensive as possible, but some of the minor characters dont merit their own sections with infoboxes in my opinion, because there's very little to say about them, but I would still like to list them somewhere.
Each bullet would have a small sentence about the character and possibly their appearance dates. I think this would be a good way to include them without clogging up the page with tons of infoboxes and barely any writing. Another reason for this is to keep fairuse images on the pages down - I'm not sure if it matters for character lists, but I noticed that the pages were listed at a 'fairuse overuse' page before we split them. Some minor characters have bigger roles than others and this way we could keep the infoboxes with images for the more important ones. What do you think? Gung adin ♦ 19:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Do you think it is necessary have the section about the X Factor promotional trailer? To me, it seems a little pointless because it doesn't include anything anyone needs to know. It is also a bit out of date because we're now in the middle of the series, with the promotional trailer long gone. Let me know what you think. Jonny - Wiki edit jonny 20:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Just a happy Birthday message to you, AnemoneProjectors, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
I know you already have one birthday greeting, but I'm feeling full of Wikilove today, and I thought I'd give you another! Happy Birthday!
→
jacĸrм (
talk |
sign )
04:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Socks 01 04:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday! I know how old you are! - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 15:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Wheres your proof that Darren is still an EastEnders character? Tonights episode said he's gone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeipedia ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
The quote I changed it to was in fact accurate of what Simon Cowell said - I'll get a reference to prove it. Jonny - Wiki edit jonny 15:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Have you taken a look at this recently Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). They have completely changed the guideline on minor character lists. This is a quote from the talk page
It used to say non-notable characters should be merged into a list, as we did, but now they are saying that these lists should not exist if notability cant be proven. This confuses me, because if notability can be proven then surely they would be entitled to their own page anyway! The lists also have to be written OOU perspective now. I've noticed that some character lists have already been nominated for deletion. I cant believe they can just change the rules like this! Sources for the 80s and 90s characters will be impossible to find. Do you think there's any point in continuing to extend our lists now? Gung adin ♦ 20:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
ah well, it's always there as an option if we need it. It's only worth doing it if everyone is on board anyway. I like the idea of dumping Pauline's storylines there and linking to it. That way we could keep the content instead of rewriting it all for the FA. Gung adin ♦ 19:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop deleting my valid edits. This may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohcahtoa...baby ( talk • contribs) 17:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi i'd appreciate your opinions on this OOU Pauline rewrite that i've started. I was unsure whether or not to make the information chronological, but I decided to go with themes instead, otherwise i'd have to break up the Arthur section and that works as a stand alone segment. This is not complete yet, but I wasnt planning to add anymore titled sections, I will just work the rest of the storylines into the ones there. Feel free to let me know if you have any ideas for changes or inclusions. I'm not keen on the title 'early storylines', but I dont know where else to put this information, the stuff about fibroids and her being axed in 1989 isnt relevant to the other segments is it? Gung adin ♦ 17:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
This is near enough complete now. I've tried to include all the plot details. I hope it's ok, let me know what you think, and feel free to edit the sandbox if you want to change anything. Gung adin ♦ 17:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
This is mostly an FYI to you as an admin who still uses the old, templated method for salting pages. That method of salting pages is depricated, and the template is now up for deletion. While things can still change, the current discussion definitely looks headed towards deletion. Assuming that this happens, you will no longer be able to salt pages with the old method, and will need to begin using the newer salting method that involves cascading protection on the title, and allows recreation to be blocked while still having no article at the name, leaving it as a red link. This new method of salting is centered at WP:PT, and the instructions for how to make it work are there as well. - TexasAndroid 13:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm almost 100% sure User:Abi is very cuddly is a sockpuppet similar to one you recently banned. → jacĸrм ( talk | sign ) 23:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Another one, User:Abi is very very cuddly. → jacĸrм ( talk | sign ) 23:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm thinking of doing something to counter the numerous edits we've had which state the judges' categories on the main X Factor page. Do you know the template that directs readers to the talk page? It appears on the page in superscript and reads 'see discussion', or something like that. Thanks. Jonny - Wiki edit jonny 17:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
By the way, on the show they seem to be referring to the lower age groups as "Boys" and "Girls". What do you think about changing it to just that? — AnemoneProjectors ( 会話) 17:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I was warning User:Mrs trueman Jr when I noticed that it appeared they had a vendetta against reverting you. When I checked further I discovered that they were actually a sock puppet of User:Mrs Trueman31 (which was apparently a sock of User:Trueman31). The latter two were blocked, with Mrs Trueman31 getting an indefinite block from you. I just thought I'd let you know what was going on in case you didn't notice the reverting. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 12:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
I've posted a new discussion topic. So far, no-ones replied to it but it's still early days. Jonny - Wiki edit Jonny 18:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Could you tell me why you think the pic of Lewis at the showcase is unnecessary please? Thanks. Wiki edit Jonny 18:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
I suspect Treueman 31 VS AnemoneProjectors ( talk · contribs) is a sockpuppet of Trueman31 ( talk · contribs). Just informing you incase you didn't see :p — jacĸrм ( talk | sign ) 15:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:New ee web.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, can you semi-protect this page please? Some anon keeps removing the disambig to Michael French (actor) for no apparent reason. Gung adin ♦ 17:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the "Bleeding Love" review from the album but there are some comments about the album that you might like to add, such as "Good things are worth waiting for and this is no exception. The debut album is likely to surprise critics." I was going to do it myself but am too tired at the moment to put it into the right words! — AnemoneProjectors ( 会話) 23:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I was just wondering whether to include that vocal coach, Mark Hudson (the one with the colourful beard), will not be returning for the fourth series. He's a pretty minor character, but a character nonetheless. The story can be seen here [9] Merci beaucoup. Wiki edit Jonny 13:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Why have you added the "Critical reception" bit to Leona's album page? The article you are linking it to is a review of the single "Bleeding Love" and not the album, hence the title of the article "Leona Lewis is back with Bleeding Love". There have been no reviews of the album yet.
Oh and can I also ask why you changed the single cover of "Bleeding Love" back to a lower quality version where the text is smaller? The new one I got from her official site and that's why I uploaded it. As it stands, the cover on the article now is wrong and not the proper one. Adi39 20:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking the recent Trueman31 sockpuppets, but please note that User:Ln of x is a different sockpuppet to User:Trueman31. Ln of x always mentions Abi Branning, Lorna Fitzgerald or me, whereas Trueman31 is into more random vandalism or adding false information to articles. — AnemoneProjectors ( 会話) 18:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! :-) - Philippe | Talk 19:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
This matter was debated earlier, and was moved to Spears's. I am surprised that you felt it correct to move it and change all the Spears's references. Wiki style guides indicate that Spears's is the correct form and the move was originally done by an admin. I suggest you revert the move. Thanks 15:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits to Quinn's debut album? I don't think it is an album of covers, as all the songs on the album are known in many versions by many artists, not just one off renderings. Gareth E Kegg 18:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry about this! :) I mistakenly did a similar thing on someone else's user page. Sometimes the mouse button gets stuck or something, and I end up clicking on "rollback" by mistake! :) Acalamari 20:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
its a redirect, relax its hardly a big deal. -- Cloveious 12:30, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
How did you get the finalists all correct only half-way through the airing of the show? Jordan hatch 18:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
I wasn't sure if you were watching the discussion, so I just thought I should let you know I had a new idea, if you want to take a look at the talk page. Taric25 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 12:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, as you are an admin and have more power than I, would you be able do something about the crap mini-biographies some people have done for the Girls and the Over 25s in the X Factor 4 article? They've just copied and pasted it straight from the X Factor website with little editing at all. Not only this, they don't provide the information we need, like their age, their occupation etc. And, they haven't referenced it. All the best Wiki edit Jonny 18:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey AP, can you give your opinion/advice on this User talk:Gungadin#Advice on proof (Letitia Dean official fan site) Does Wiki have a way for checking whether so-called official sites are genuine? It seems genuine to me, but it keeps getting removed with no explanation. Gung adin ♦ 21:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Have you seen this? It's disgusting! I always knew that Icaro was plain crazy. [10] Wiki edit Jonny 19:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, how can I stop that persistent user who keeps making this [11] edit? I've reverted it something like three times now and I'm getting tired of it. Cheers - Wiki edit Jonny 11:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at this [12]. Do you think it's reliable? Seeing as Leona's perfoming at the first show the theme, Number 1s, would seem apt. Wiki edit Jonny 11:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
ANEMONE! THEY'VE REALEASED THE SONG CHOICES FOR THE FIRST LIVE SHOW [13]. Argh, I don't know what to do with all the information! Can you do one of your funky tables with all the live show details? Muchas thanks :-) — Wiki edit Jonny 18:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Same Difference were surprisingly okay. I think Kimberley was definitely the right choice as there's no way she could have won the competition (and she just looked plain odd with the Christina thing going on). WHAT HAPPENED WITH LEON?! Poor thing, he's got an amazing voice but his performance tonight was just a mess! Niki, Beverley, Rhydian and Hope stood out for me though (although ITV's gonna get a tonne of complaints for Raquelle's slapper top). What about you? Wiki edit Jonny 22:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Just think, all the people fuelling American pop culture will soon be looking at the Leona Lewis article to investigate who she is—can't wait! They're gonna prick up their ears when they hear Leona debuting on American media and we (in Britain) will be sitting looking pretty smug lol Wiki edit Jonny 19:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Big Brother UK contestants ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Number1spygirl 12:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Fame Academy participants ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Number1spygirl 12:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Pop Idol contestants ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Number1spygirl 12:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:The X Factor contestants ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Number1spygirl 12:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
What do you think of the songs for this week? [14] Personally I think Daniel's is a disaster and I don't know why Sharon's got Alisha singing a song that's 40 years old. All the others I'm happy with though. Wiki edit Jonny 09:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. Please see my comment at Talk:2007 in British music re: sortable tables. violet/riga (t) 14:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Come on MSN and I'll explain to you. Majorly ( talk) 19:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
As you're an admin, I thought I'd ask you... I'm looking to put one of those things to say that it doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards and/or it's under review at the top of the Spice Girls article. Have you seen the article?! It's terrible! It's been written by a load of non-registered users who don't know how to spell, write objectively or just write anything coherent at all! lol Wiki edit Jonny 23:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Why have you edited my page when you don't know me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.212.46.184 ( talk) 17:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you think it's necessary to have the results summary showing the bottom two? As the same information is given in the live show details. Wiki edit Jonny 20:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you have an opinion on this? You know what annoys me the most? The same people were commenting on the article both before and during the peer review, and none of this tense crap was brought up then. It seems like they wait til it gets to FAC to do it, just to be contrary. Gung adin ♦ 22:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Not too keen on Futureproof's song, but there are quite a few I've never even heard of - what's "Hanky Panky"?! Emily and Alisha finally have appropriate songs though. Never thought 'Reach' by S-Club 7 was a big band number! I like the fact that I haven't heard of a few of them, it's more original. [16] Wiki edit Jonny 12:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Tsk! The Futureproof one! It was originally created for Big Brother but it works for anything. Have you thought about putting something on your userpage?
anemone|
projectors
18:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I doubt it'll be a double elimination night on Saturday seeing as they've already lost Emily. Who'd have thought it eh? Scandalous! I wouldn't be surprised if Sharon asks for one of the girls from her visit to judge's home round to be allowed into the live shows to replace Nakanda Wiki edit Jonny 15:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I wrote some of this tonight. It's not complete yet. I want to add sections for some other prisoners and then do some brief descriptions about the firm characters and police/prison officers. Do you think that would be ok? and also can you reinstate the deleted images please ? :) Gung adin ♦ 22:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Hiya, I noticed you closed this AFD as "nomination withdrawn" which is definitely accurate - I'm not an expert on closing AFDs, but I get the feeling some sort of record ought to be left of this decision at the talk page Talk:Wank Week? I think it involves applying {{ Oldafdfull}} but I may be wrong! Ta, TheGrappler 02:51, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Not good news then? It should have been Andy in my opinion Wiki edit Jonny 22:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Why did you feel the need to undo my changes? Do you want me to GIVE you the acapella of it so you can see for yourself my friend?
"this original research is worse than the other original research, it also contains a personal interpretation of the meaning - this needs a source if it to be readded"
I will personally pitch down the acapella and add just the sample of the chorus for you just to make you happy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremador ( talk • contribs) 02:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Dude you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Why don't you fucking check the a capella for yourself and see that it says I'M BLUE IF I WOULD BLEED I WOULD DIE? Jesus some people in this world just shouldn't exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremador ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
And what does it say? I'M BLUE IF I WOULD BLEED I WOULD DIE. Stop editing the page and let people see for themselves jackass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremador ( talk • contribs) 20:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
The information *CAN* be verified. LISTEN TO THE A CAPELLA OF IT AND YOU WILL SEE WHAT IT SAYS. Extremador 21:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
There has been some problems with adding unsourced, and/or unreliable information to the List of Smallville episodes page. Robinepowell continually adds episode titles and airdates to the page without providing any source, or providing sources that completely fail Wikipedia's reliable sourcing guideline. As you can see on on her talk page, I have continued to try and explain to her the problems with each of the sources she's claiming to get the information from. First she pulled from Kryptonsite, which is a fansite. Then she pulled from spoilerfix, episode world, episode list, and scifistream.com. All appear to get their information from Kryptonsite, some explicitly saying so. The key to the majority of those sources she cites is that any registered person can edit and add more episodes on their pages. When I reviewed each sources "About us" page, it was clear that they were all fansites. You can see the sources on my talk page. She has since been claiming that a TV Guide source that says Smallville has enough scripts for 16 episodes is a translation that all the titles and airdates on those fansites is fair game to use--even though TV Guide does not mention any title or airdate for any episode in their article. This is become such a stupid edit war, and I'm only trying to preserve the integrity of the featured list. Am I wrong in this? I'm sorry to bug you with it, but you're one of the few Admins I know that appears around television related articles. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you please explain your revert of my edit, if not please self revert. Thank you and regards.-- Vintagekits 23:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Pretty happy with all of them, although they could have found a better song for Rhydian. [18] Wiki edit Jonny 11:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, AnemoneProjectors! Thanks for signing my signature book! I love your signature, its exquisite. Anyway, its a little late for this, but:
Dearest AnemoneProjectors,
Zachary
crimsonwolf wishes you a Happy
Halloween! Send this card to other spookers, even if it's a little late. Have a spooky Halloween and cheers!
Thanks to JetLover for his pumpkin image! Thanks to Dreadstar for his card format!
If this card comes to you, tell Zachary how you like his card!
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The X Factor (UK series 4). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Elanthiel 20:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Probably another sockpuppet of
User:Ln of x (my personal stalker).
anemone|
projectors
14:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you could clarify something for me. When editing wiki articles, am I correct in thinking that it is inappropriate to include external links to fansites? I was under the impression that if people are contributing to an article about a singer or actor for example, then only their official website should be included as well as any relevant published sources (such as newspaper articles, interviews, IMDb page, etc). I have come across a few pages recently that have links to fan websites and always thought that this was considered to be inappropriate linkage to Wiki articles as they are not technically official sources - regardless of how well made they are. Thank you. 79.69.45.4 23:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
What on earth have they done for Rydian? That song is horrific! [19] Wiki edit Jonny 11:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
It seems TWINKLE isn't very helpful when reporting sockpuppets! Sorry for the confusion in tags added to various user pages - it was the first time I'd used TWINKLE for reporting sockpuppets and I don't think I will again! Stephenb (Talk) 19:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for taking some photos of Stevenage. I wanted to (and it would be easy as I live there), but I don't own a camera. Did you come on a Sunday? It's a shame, because the place looks empty and it's not typical. A busy Saturday afternoon would have been better! You'll have to come back!
anemone|
projectors
23:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Apologies, guess that's what having to play commercial disco music on a Friday night does to me - definitely a good fact for pub quiz trivia though :) Cheers, Richsage ( talk) 20:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
May I ask why you got rid of the table that I created for next weeks show?-- Hiltonhampton ( talk) 20:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! Jack ?! 00:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
To AnemoneProjectors for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Thanks! Jack ?! 00:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC) |
I've started on my user page but I don't know how to liven it up into a better format. Any pointers? :) Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 01:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you undelete these for me when youy get the chance please? :)
Image:Devcorrie.jpg Image:Doreenfenwick.jpg Image:Yana corrie.jpg Gung adin ♦ 18:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure who the original artists are of Leon and Hope's songs. But I think it's good to see Rhydian doing a straight-up vocal performance rather than prancing around on stage. There's no way Beverley can pull off that number, her voice is no way near good enough. Niki's is likely to sound dated. Same Difference will probably pull that one off because they did it at their judges' homes audition. [20] Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 11:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
WHAT THE HELL ARE HOPE STILL DOING IN THE COMPETITION?!?! It's so obvious that the public don't like them because they've been in the bottom two three times now. It doesn't matter how bloody good you are, if no-one likes you then no-one's gonna buy your singles! Beverly sounded a lot worse over the TV than what the judges were hearing — they loved her performance when it sounded terrible from where I was sitting. On a firmly positive note, Same Difference were seriously good tonight! I have finally been won-over by those two because they actually delivered a decent vocal performace rather than larked around with props on stage. Rhydian was so-so tonight in my opinion; he can do a lot better than that because his performance wasn't original. Niki as well lost it halfway through her song and it sounded rough. I'm starting to like Leon a lot now. He's a better jazz-singer than a pop singer, hopefully we won't have another Ray Quinn on our hands! I've got to say though, I loved the whole deadlock thing, it was so dramatic and the suspense was way better than the normal voting. Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 21:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
List of births, marriages and deaths in EastEnders, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of births, marriages and deaths in EastEnders satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of births, marriages and deaths in EastEnders and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of births, marriages and deaths in EastEnders during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. AnmaFinotera ( talk) 22:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Heylo, do you think we could get away with unprotecting the article now? Hopefully that idiot who kept making the Jacksons edit will have made a much-needed exit lol. Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 15:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I suggest removing the "Michael Vincent" altogether until a source better than The Sun reports it, unless it was mentioned live on the programme. Brad ( talk) 00:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi AnemoneProjectors. Please consider adding your admin username to the growing list at Classification of admins. Best! -- Jreferee t/ c 23:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I quite like most of the songs they've chosen; not because I like the songs individually, but because they're different. That is all apart from Louis who yet again, has chosen safe and somewhat dated songs for Niki. GRRGH [21] Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 12:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Look, it's happened Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor EastEnders characters. This person must be trying to get adminship or something, upping their involvement in AFDs to up their stats. I'm getting really pissed off with this whole project. Gung adin ♦ 21:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
That's what i have been dreading. They may regret it when they have to do hundreds of AFDs for all the minor characters who will probably get their own page if there's no list to put them in. The fact that we had to merge so many should be an indication to them. But that's a good idea about the spin offs. Gung adin ♦ 22:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
this dude is just nasty. Gung adin ♦ 23:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Like I said to Gungadin, I'm laying off EastEnders for now. But the two of you should be able to find sources, or not, for the three characters I already nominated. I hope you noticed I left Wellard and Willy alone, since they seem to be notable. Fee Fi Foe Fum 00:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Can you come to that talk page to discuss please? Rhanyeia ♥ ♫ 17:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
A bit predictable but should be a good show [24]. Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 12:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Glad Niki went. Ironically, she gave her best performance on her last one... at least she went out with a bang! Personally I thought the performances this week was seriously dreary! The first half was all slow funeral songs that barely had a melody. It got better in the second half but it wasn't great. What on earth was going on with those dancers during Rhydian's "Bridge Over Troubled Water"?! Leon had a pretty bad week but the public love him, as they do Same Difference. I really don't care about what Louis says at all now, he's sunk so far in my estimation that just don't care if he exists (harsh, I know). At least he won't be back for series 5. What a pathetic man, he better give SD their due in the final next week. Although, it won't make any difference because the public obviously haven't been listening to what he says about them anyway. Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 22:44, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Can you just expain to me what fair use images are and why they are not allowed on my page. Thanks In23065 ( talk) 19:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
This is the last time we'll do this! [25] Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 12:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
I'd simply like to mention that your signature is unique and asthetically pleasing. нмŵוτн τ 17:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
WHAT DID I TELL YOU?! WHAT DID I F**KING TELL YOU?!?!?! MAYBE I SHOULD TURN OFF CAPS LOCK haha Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 22:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. In23065 ( talk) 15:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Look at this, I made this fabulous card all for you. It took me ages. Okay, I stole it off someones talk page :) Merry Christmas, and I just wanted to say that Leon sucks and Rydian shoulda won X-Factor. I think this looks like him [26] Gung adin ♦ 22:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks! Yeah that does look like Rhydian. But actually Futureproof should have won. Leon's better than Rhydian anyway.
anemone│
projectors
22:35, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
if he's going to go riding a sleigh with a naked cupid on his lap then what does he expect! Gung adin ♦ 23:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Ok then. Weirdy Talk 04:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I'd be inclined to reinstate the page and punt it off to AFD, because I see an edit war looming. (FWIW I'd vote weak keep but I think your reasons are sound and stand a good chance of being accepted. In fact, if you nominate it I won't vote - howsat? :-) ) Ros0709 ( talk) 21:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Why was the X Factor Series 5 article deleted? it will easily be created again by someone else, as there will be a series 5. But why did you delete the article? ( Shadowmoon13 ( talk) 21:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC))
No it wasn't. There will be an X Factor series 5, and someone will easily create it again. Its best to create it now. ( Shadowmoon13 ( talk) 08:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC))
Are you sure about that? I haven't seen any reference to it on-screen. Maybe I don't pay attention though.
anemone│
projectors
00:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Template:Rescue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Benjiboi 21:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
You and I have reverted many attempts to promote some X Factor fansites. It seemed pretty clear to me they were being promoted by the creator and thus fell foul of WP:COI but that concern aside, are they actually bad links? I've decided to let it be - but if the links should be purged then perhaps Shadowbot should be employed? Ros0709 ( talk) 23:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
hi, i was wondering why everytime i try to add the fonejacker fansite to the fonejacker wiki page you remove it. do you not consider it to be a fonejacker resource? i see that almost every wiki pages has a link to a fansite in some way. do you have a personal vendetta againt me adding this resource? please dont take this message to be insulting in anyway. i just wish to know why. kind regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.95.165 ( talk) 12:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey there.
Could you tell me who you believe that user to be a sock of? — Coren (talk) 17:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the portal spacing at Portal:Television. Cirt ( talk) 21:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC).
Hi! I was wondering if I could ask you a question about the above, which you protected from creation in September. I came across Big Brother 2008 UK while looking through New Pages, and after editing a little, tried to move it to Big Brother 2008 (UK) to be consistent with the titles of other years of the series. I don't know a lot about Big Brother, and I'm not an admin, so I'm not sure if:
Hi Anemone - I've been looking for the Maltese Singles Chart to help update the Bleeding Love page but can't find it - the link given on the wiki page doesn;t lead to the chart. Can you help? Leipzigger98 20:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I just saw that you reverted my revert with the summary "this shouldn't have been reverted", and would appreciate your reasoning for this. I reverted it because it appeared to me that somebody had part censored an offensive word in a direct quote. Crimsone 23:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Humourous is a mistake, see User:Spellmaster. -- Guinnog 01:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
It is Charles, foo'. Stop reverting my changes as well please, it's getting tedious. HelterSkelter88 00:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
That doesn't mean anything. I've read numerous times he has been known as actor Charles Hawkins, which made me "lol". Also I enjoy keeping that page up to date & informative.
HelterSkelter88
21:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I can't remember, it was about 9 months ago now, when I did the page in the first place. And it's a bit unfair to say that I've not provided a lot for the page because without my input it'll still be a stub, there was absolutely nothing about him on the net really, I had to scour the corners of the net to find anything, really. Also found that picture which is the only one that isn't a promo or TV screenshot. Very unfair remarks. HelterSkelter88 03:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
I actually can't remember now, it was one of the 4 corners of the internet thats all I remember, about 9 months ago... I don't like that picture though to be honest! Interesting that he's sporting Enter Shikari there though, which the BBC now have tipped to be huge this year - unknowns about a year ago. HelterSkelter88 23:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
I see you created the Winehouse songs category. I didn't check, but I assume you created the Winehouse albums category. Instead of the separation, why not a Winehouse Discography category, or a broader Winehouse-related category? Vegasrebel29 04:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
If you need any assistance, let me know. -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 12:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you knew how to ask Wikipedia of an image that could be used as I want to start an article or contribute to one. So, I wondering how you get an image which already isn't on Wikipedia but to get it on. Sounds bizzare but please if you can help it'd be great. Oriana is cool 12:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I must just be quicker and more on the ball than you! (And I knew you'd say something about "crap" as soon as I clicked "Save page"!) - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 23:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
As you are aware, I nominated {{ Greene}} for deletion a couple weeks ago. I have no problem with the outcome, other than I think the "userbox" solution (moving the box from template space to user space) would have been an appropriate result. While a number of comments suggested "userfy", no one offered to have it in their userspace. Today, in reviewing your AfD nom, I came across your " userbox". I'd like to propose userfying the template by replacing it with your box. (I'll also post this comment on the talk page for the template. Agent 86 02:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I just wondered how you know this pornographic film is a spoof of EastEnders (other than the title of the film). If you've seen it (and I hope you haven't) I'd be interested to know in what ways it spoofs EastEnders. If you haven't seen it then we should just say the title of the film spoofs the name of the show, unless you've read about it. I know Nichola Holt's in it. And presumably there's a RearEnders film that came before RearEnders 2. — AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 23:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I just wondered why you removed a BJAODN from the BJAODN. Isn't that what it's for? — AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 23:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Do you WATCH me or something? Because it's getting very tedious you editing all of my edits. Nobody else does. Or do you just happen to have the same sort of interests as me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HelterSkelter88 ( talk • contribs) 00:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
I have noted your concerns over my changes to Michelle McManus' wiki page. I would like to point out that I was very drunk at the time.
By the way, I think someone is pissed off with you, or do you really enjoy nude cycle rides? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.101.131.31 ( talk • contribs) 11:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
Hey,
Sorry about adding the link. I just assumed you were allowed as the Maria Lawson page has 2 external links to fansites. Is it different rules for different pages?
Adi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adi39 ( talk • contribs) 22:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
I apologise for my "vandalism" of the Wikipedia entry on The Rose (song). I did so as I disagree with the overabundant reference to the band Westlife and their version of the song. I feel the page should be more referent to the original Bette Midler version as it is the more popular version and thus is more likely to be sought information about. If you would be willing to add a picture of the Bette Midler record cover and some basic release facts in addition to the Westlife references I will consider the matter resolved and apologize for any problems I may have caused. If you do not see this as a amicable solution to the disagreement then I will seek to edit the page properly myself following the Wikipedia contributions guidelines and forums, thank you. Further correspondance may be sent to the e-mail provided below.
colby989@yahoo.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.112.50.41 ( talk) 23:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC).
Just to piss Majorly off, I'm going to congratulate you first on your RfA! Congrats dude! If you ever need help with the admin tools, feel free to contact me. =) Nishkid 64 01:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Yup, you are now an admin. Congratulations!!! Danny 01:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on your RfA!! Now you have the tools.-- Wikipedier ( talk • contribs) 02:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
I am pleased to let you know that, consensus reached, you are now an Administrator. You should find the following forums useful:
Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge! thanks/ Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 01:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
How come you removed the cast card link on Paul Priestly? arent we allowed to link to these anymore? Gungadin 19:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
cos i donnt no what u want cos i told u where it is, i didnt upload it i just no where it is on teh internet. Lilyfan87 19:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Just received your message about someone editing wikipedia. If you ban this range, a large network will be affected, and I will be forced to have your administrative powers removed since you are now ON NOTICE. Do not ban this IP range, multiple users will be affected.
I just verified this information, and it appears that you are overstepping your bounds as an administrator, something I do NOT take lightly. I know many people who use wiki, and you are not the be all end all. You may want to review policies before you ban someone, especially in this case, where you will affect people who have done nothing wrong.
I quote from the message you sent: Repeated changing of English when you have been asked to cease doing it may be seen as vandalism.
However, there is NOTHING in the rules that states you are empowered to ban someone for this. Further, it specifically states, under "What vandalism is NOT":
Stubbornness
Some users cannot come to agreement with others who are willing to talk to them about an editing issue, and repeatedly make changes opposed by everyone else. This is regrettable - you may wish to see our dispute resolution pages to get help. However, this is not "vandalism" and should not be dealt with as such.
That said, DO NOT BAN THE IP. I WILL DISPUTE IT AND HAVE YOUR POWERS AS AN ADMIN REVOKED POST HASTE DUE TO ABUSE AND INABILITY TO PROPERLY FOLLOW THE TENETS TO WHICH YOU AGREED TO.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.176.167.204 ( talk) 06:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC).
Sonia Fowler has been "vprotected" - could you change it to "sprotected", like Phil and Ben, please? I don't know the difference but I think the "sprotected" banner makes it clearer... - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 20:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Type "Este usuário é um [[project:administrator|administrador]] na [[:en:|Wikipédia em inglês]] e está aqui para fazer pequenas correções. Ele não fala português" here. Greets, Slade ( The Joker) 15:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Recently me and my boyfriend were discussing what turns each other on. We had a discussion of all the usual fantasies, but his latest one made me feel sick - he said he wanted us to have sex in our unwashed underwear - and I said no. I said it would pose health risks, but he laughed it off as "patent nonsense".
Every time we have sex now he keeps demanding we do it, and I've told him no countless times, but he still insists its good. He even said to me "Life is better when your undies stink!" I said "What???" and told him no way, we're not doing it.
How do I convince him that his suggestion is very risky (in health terms) - as it is, isn't it??
What should I do?? He's still insisting we should do it, claiming "it's sexy and good for you".
Help me!
Marie x
-- Mariemullaghan1982 12:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
... why you're changing all the categories on the EastEnders articles to "DEFAULTSORT"? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 15:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
OK, as you may have seen on my sandbox, I am creating a table of when characters appeared in the show. Is there any way [that you know of] for anyone browsing the table to hide rows [there are so many], so only two or three characters are shown, thus letting them compare which years said characters appeared in? I thought about the hide buttons on navigation templates, but then users would have to click [for example] 148 hide buttons out of 150 rows to compare two rows... Can you help? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 18:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed your participation in AFD nominations of X Factor contestants, and would value your opinions of this. It seems that there is some confusion on whether these individuals are notable or not, and I was wondering whether you could provide some useful input. Thanks. --GW_Simulations User Page | Talk 19:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 22:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey can you help me with something as I'm not too sure how to go about this. A photographer from Flickr has allowed me to use some of his pics on Wiki under a free license. He just said let me know when it's done. So can I just uplaod them now and link to the original @ Flickr on the image page?
Gungadin 16:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Television Barnstar | ||
I would like to award you this television barnstar for your hard work on EastEnders-related articles. - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 19:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC) |
Hi! I'm trying to rewrite the USCA article so that it incorporates the information from all the individual house articles, at which time I'll AfD most of the individual house articles (and TfD the nav template). However, someone AfD'd the Sherman Hall article before I got to it. Can you restore the last content in my user space? Thanks, Αργυριου (talk) 04:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
===> Instead of being a brat and removing the American Idol Season 6 pictures - why don't you try to get them validated and leave them up until they are either validated or denied... The page looks bland with just text in it. Are you going to get sued if the pictures remain? No... so leave them up there. emceepotential 16:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you seem to be very good at formatting userboxes, so I need to request your assistance. I have been trying to reorganize my userboxes, add a few new ones, and get rid of some old ones, but I somehow made a mistake in formatting, and my user page now has userboxes all over the place. If you can spot the problem, please repair it. Thank you very much in advance! aido2002 03:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Why did you choose delete? It is a very helpful template, and I could've written it from scratch as far as anyone knows. I changed it to suit Wikipedia, and it is not broken at all. Please change your vote and ask others to do so as well. Thanks. -- Silva Storm
Thank you for your message
The links on the article Rise Underground shall never be removed again, from now on. I don't have a good reason as why to remove the links.
Thanks
86.3.175.191 —The preceding comment was added by 86.3.175.191 ( talk • contribs) 7 March 2007 19:35 (UTC).
Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:
If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, can you warn this user User talk:9knoxroad or give him a temporary ban, because he seems to be using his account to add nonsense dates to EE articles. Gungadin 22:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
You know what to do. - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 16:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Why did you move Comic Relief does Fame Academy BACK to Comic Relief Does Fame Academy, when it clearly states on the official BBC Fame Academy page that it is "Comic Relief does Fame Academy"? ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/fameacademy). It has already been moved once before. Timclare (talk) (sign here) 16:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Telly addict 21:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for givin me a barnstar-- HW-Barnstar PLS 13:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
I don't know where the title Doing It My Way came from, and I don't know why it's listed on the BBC's charts, but please can you note that Ray Quinn's official website refers to it as a self-titled album, for example on this page. — AnemoneProjectors ( zomg!) 20:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
...find out which articles I have created without going through my 12000+ contributions? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 16:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Having looked over your edits i think you are more than deserving... keep up the good work.-- Jamesmh2006 14:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC) ---- feel free to repay the favour anytime ;P
I was hoping you might take another look at the deletion of Image:A7d65e0e.jpg. You deleted it for not having a copyright tag; however, it looks like it was originally PD-released by the uploader, Rainshine and an anon, 76.173.233.180 simply removed the tag for whatever reason. I wasn't sure if you forgot to check the history or if there was another reason for deleting the image. ShadowHalo 07:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Ben bu topraklarda Şebinkarahisar da yaşıyorum bu topraklada doğdum bu topraklarda büyüdüm ve neler yaşandığını sizlerden daha iyi biliyorum ama benim şehrimin benim yaşadığım yerin tarihinin yanlış taraflı ve lobicilik faaliyetleri içerisinde insalara olmayan bir şeyi sahte, asılsız ve düzmece kaynakları sunarak olmuş gibi göstererek anlatılmasını önleyemiyorum banlanıyorum yada Şebinkarahisar maddesi kilitleriniyor. Sizler bu topraklarda yaşadınızmı da biliyorsunuz ? Ermeni Diasporası tarihi istedikleri gibi yazabilir mi ? Ellerinde yetkileri var diye bu yetkilerini kendi çıkarları için kullanabilirler mi ? Neden tüm Türk sayfalarına sadece asılsız ermeni soykırımı hakkında bilgiler ekliyorlar Vikipedia tarafsız ve özgür ansiklopedi değilmi ? Madem bu admin arkadaşalar çok bilgili neden coğrafi, ekonomik, nüfus bilgilerini insanlar için faydalı olacak bilgileri girmiyorlarda sadece asılsız ermeni soykırımı hakkında bilgiler veriyorlar. BU HAKKI NEREDEN BULUYORLAR ? -- 88.231.200.89 10:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey AnemoneProjectors, thanks for your kind support in my RfB. Sadly, it didn't pass, but I appreciate the support, and I do intend to run again eventually. Happy editing! Majorly (o rly?) 03:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Penis1234-1-.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Is there anything that can be done about this? It's clearly Danh90... - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 14:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back! :) - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 22:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Could you please point me in the right direction to where I can request a policy to be changed? I really don't think that articles about past characters and TV shows that have ended should be written in present tense, and I want to get the policy on that changed. Could you help me out? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 20:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:KitKatFineDarkUK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Bkell ( talk) 17:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
As recommended in the peer review, could you change the refrences on Pauline Fowler to cite news and cite web ones? I would, but I don't really know how it works... can't see what's wrng with them as they are, but apparently it makes a difference. Also, do you know how to do page references for info from books? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 22:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Are these still semi-protected? If not, could you re-protect them? Danh90 is back. - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 11:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I have to go now, but could you take over reverting edits made by (and warning) User:Majormk42, please? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 21:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Can you please move Bree Van de Kamp Hodge to Bree Hodge? - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 18:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Could you please protect User talk:Oldman50, please? He's falsifying user warnings etc. again. - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 10:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
It might prokove him to make more accounts, though... - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 10:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at User talk:How3, lol - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 20:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
I notice you added him to the list of minors. is one of these Tony Andrews? [1] [2] Gungadin 19:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm glad you like it. I changed it up a bit since the Green color seemed a bit random (It was only green because it was the color the person I originally supported's clothing was in the official group photo). I changed it to a neutral gray, but if you'd like to add color these eyes are free for use in the box: Image:GrayscaleEyePink.JPG, Image:GrayscaleEyeGreen.JPG, Image:GrayscaleEyeBlue.JPG, and Image:GrayscaleEyeYellow.JPG. FireSpike 00:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm curious to know the source of your information that states this album has been marketed as "self titled" only, as every retailer I have encountered lists it as "Ray Quinn (Doing It My Way)". This includes All Music Guide, Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble, Yahoo Music, and a host of others. It seems to me the correct title for the album would be Ray Quinn (Doing It My Way). ( Mind meal 00:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC))
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Yougivemesomething.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:51, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
I noticed your query on WP:AN/I about a possible copyright infringment about http://www.fonejacker.tv taking information from the Wikipedia article Kayvan Novak (and the IMBD entry) and placing a copyright tag on it claiming it is their own. Just letting you know I contacted the owners of the fonejacker.tv website and hopefully this can be resolved. I'll let you know if anything else develops. Cheers! — Moe ε 23:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
I see you keep reverting my very valid edits and have now seen to that the abi branning page is protected. I cannot see why you deleted what I added to the article, since it was all factually accurate. Now I know in the past I've made some less than sensible edits to certain pages but this time i wasn't taking the piss. What's more, that clown freak (User : can't sleep clown will eat me) bloody blocked me. I think my edits should be restored, either fully or at least partially, SINCE THEY ARE TRUE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.69.102.68 ( talk • contribs) 23:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi AnemoneProjectors,
Just messaging you about the 'speculation/guesswork' I put on the article. I'm happy to have anything I've written edited or removed with good reason. I accept that the thing about the managment of the winning act was a bit too speculative and am okay with seeing that go. However the bit about the judges' vote for which act would go home each week was half fact. It is true that there will need to be a change to the format in this respect because with four voters there can be a tie. Speculation aside, it is perfectly permissible to say that the format will change with regard to the judges' vote without saying that bit about the mentor of the act with the lowest vote losing their right etc. May I re-add that bit about the judges' vote...? without the speculation! hehe
Let me know what you think,
Jonny —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Wiki edit jonny (
talk •
contribs) 14:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC
Hey, do you think it would be worth making a character specific EE template for Pauline? As well as spouses we could have siblings, parents, children etc. That way we could get rid of the family section, but keep the same amount of info in the article. I thought it might be a good solution as the section is getting criticised quite a bit on the FA. Gungadin 19:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Why do you keep on reverting peoples edits? Wikipedia is a website that can edited by all. Fair enough some edits do need reverting, but not all of them. The EastEnders character page is the page you seem to be focusing on more recently. The situation where the dates are being included, and then you revert them, you say is due to a "project consensus." - by who? Its the first i've heard of it and also alot of people judging by the number of times its being edited. Your excuse of it not being needed due to "individual dates is available in the articles for individual characters" can also be said for the ALL the other soaps but yet they have the date information both on the main page, and on the individual pages. Why should the EastEnders page have to be different. It looks stupid as it is now. It SHOULD be changed to include the dates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.207.214.132 ( talk • contribs) 22:37, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Looking for something to do?
WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to
have you on board.
Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing! You recieved this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 22:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC) |
I would urge you to reinstate Category:Men with unusually large penis and submit it to a regular CfD. The category had more than 50 entries. I do not accept your deletion criteria, and I would like the community (of those who would care) to be able to have its say on this. __ meco 06:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
The errors you have just reverted were made unwittingly, so it's good that you caught them! __ meco 14:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Editor meco has posted a statement at 19:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC), on the talk page for the Human penis size article, that you, the nominator for deletion of, Category:Men with unusually large penis, are now his supporter in his effort to include his silly list, "Men famous for their large penis," in the Human penis size article. He is confusing you with AnonEMouse, who mentioned three names of non-porn stars in the category deletion discussion, which, in his confusion, and despertion for support, he takes as an endorsement for inclusion of his list in that article. 72.76.10.245 22:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I wish to add a photo to Will Young's page but cannot understand the instructions! It is a jpeg photo of Will in concert. Can you help? Oyster24 14:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Activites of this user Freedomeagle centered around deleting images, I think we have a griefer since he seems to go around indiscriminately tagging each image he finds. Klichka 19:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I do not understand why you insist on reverting perfectly accurate edits on this page. It is unnecessary and reduces the accuracy of the article. I don't know what point you are trying to make, but if I decided to constantly revert/delete perfectly true information, you wouldn't be best impressed, would you ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.76.37.249 ( talk • contribs) 22:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey, what are your thoughts about the comments on the Pauline talk page? Are you still interested in getting it to FA? and do you think we should try and work all the storylines into the development so we can erase the duplicated information? I asked Trampikey, but he doesnt seem to be active here at the moment and I wanted to get your opinons before going ahead with it. I'm not bothered either way, but i'd be willing to do it if everyone thinks it's a good idea. Gungadin 20:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I changed the picture on the Andy Hunter page, but it was taken of. Why? The picture I put on is so much better then the one there is now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rune Thandy ( talk • contribs) 20:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
In actual fact, a forum is a perfectly reliable source and is of course the consesus of Eastenders viewers since a wide variety of people comment on these forums. Hence it is a representitive sample of the population of Eastenders viewers and is therefore a reliable source. Seeing as I have 9A*s at GCSE, including subjects where you need to use sources, I think I know what I'm talking about, matey.
And WHY THE HELL isn't it important. It is clearly very important and relevant info to be included in the article. You have not justified why it isn't important, you have merely stated it, thinking that just because you are an "administrator" (ie: you spend more time on the internet than most other people) that gives you a right to do whatever you want. How exciting for you !! You don't seem to be able to come up with a logical reason as to why it cannot be inluded, or a logical response to any of my arguments, you just vaguely state, 'it is not important'.
I also noticed you protected the article. How very immature of you. Doing this means you get your own way just because you're a poxy administrator. I noticed on another wikipedia page (about protected pages) it says administrators should NEVER protect pages in an edit war witha non established user, but instead should resolve the issue on a user talk page. You are unable to do this, since you are unable to reasonably justify why my edits can't be included so you resort to the petty action of protecting the page. Well, seeing as you have gone against wikipedia policy by protecting the page in an edit war, I may have to report this to someone higher up, unless you include my edits in some shape or form. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.19.169 ( talk • contribs) 20:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I've just reverted an edit to Cambridge made in your name, stating that "Many cyclists in Cambridge prefer to do so naked". I must say I've never witnessed this phenomenon! I notice you are an administrator, so I assume good faith - I just hope someone doesn't have unauthorised access to your account. All the best, -- Malfidus ~ (talk) 16:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Regarding a few of your edits such as [5], [6], and [7], please take the time to read when a redirect should be properly categorized. Categories of trivial matters are unnecessary, the redirects become italised in the category page and further clutters it. I'm no expert on this guideline (just following protocal) but if you have any questions, please leave a message at WT:CAT-RD instead of my talk page if you still feel that they should be categorized the way you desire them to. Thank you, Lord Sesshomaru 22:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of List of minor EastEnders characters 1990, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mind42.com/wiki/Joan_Garwood. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 17:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
The Sister, Sister twins in EastEnders... strange casting! - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 12:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Meh, the rumour's been trashed, they'll be played by twins from Essex... on a brighter not, Shouty Man Kevin and his kids are leaving, but Diane Parish is going on maternity leave :( - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 14:10, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Probably not CSD material, but do you think Paulo da costa should be taken to AfD? - WarthogDemon 21:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
What are your thoughts on merging past babies/young children into the minor lists, such as Jack Evans and Joe dimarco? I know they appeared over many years, but most of them had no real storylines of their own, so expansion wont ever be possible. There isnt much OOU info that can be included in their articles either. The only exception I can think of is Hassan Osman and maybe Tomas Covelenco (but he's been merged anyway). Gung adin ♦
I thought that screenshots were pictures taken through a didital camera of a television screen of the subject of an article. Could you please tell me how to make a proper screenshot? Kkbhe 07:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Would you have any objections to me including a bullet point list of supporting characters within the list of minor characters? I'd like to make our lists as comprehensive as possible, but some of the minor characters dont merit their own sections with infoboxes in my opinion, because there's very little to say about them, but I would still like to list them somewhere.
Each bullet would have a small sentence about the character and possibly their appearance dates. I think this would be a good way to include them without clogging up the page with tons of infoboxes and barely any writing. Another reason for this is to keep fairuse images on the pages down - I'm not sure if it matters for character lists, but I noticed that the pages were listed at a 'fairuse overuse' page before we split them. Some minor characters have bigger roles than others and this way we could keep the infoboxes with images for the more important ones. What do you think? Gung adin ♦ 19:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Do you think it is necessary have the section about the X Factor promotional trailer? To me, it seems a little pointless because it doesn't include anything anyone needs to know. It is also a bit out of date because we're now in the middle of the series, with the promotional trailer long gone. Let me know what you think. Jonny - Wiki edit jonny 20:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Just a happy Birthday message to you, AnemoneProjectors, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
I know you already have one birthday greeting, but I'm feeling full of Wikilove today, and I thought I'd give you another! Happy Birthday!
→
jacĸrм (
talk |
sign )
04:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Socks 01 04:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday! I know how old you are! - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 15:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Wheres your proof that Darren is still an EastEnders character? Tonights episode said he's gone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeipedia ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
The quote I changed it to was in fact accurate of what Simon Cowell said - I'll get a reference to prove it. Jonny - Wiki edit jonny 15:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Have you taken a look at this recently Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). They have completely changed the guideline on minor character lists. This is a quote from the talk page
It used to say non-notable characters should be merged into a list, as we did, but now they are saying that these lists should not exist if notability cant be proven. This confuses me, because if notability can be proven then surely they would be entitled to their own page anyway! The lists also have to be written OOU perspective now. I've noticed that some character lists have already been nominated for deletion. I cant believe they can just change the rules like this! Sources for the 80s and 90s characters will be impossible to find. Do you think there's any point in continuing to extend our lists now? Gung adin ♦ 20:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
ah well, it's always there as an option if we need it. It's only worth doing it if everyone is on board anyway. I like the idea of dumping Pauline's storylines there and linking to it. That way we could keep the content instead of rewriting it all for the FA. Gung adin ♦ 19:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop deleting my valid edits. This may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohcahtoa...baby ( talk • contribs) 17:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi i'd appreciate your opinions on this OOU Pauline rewrite that i've started. I was unsure whether or not to make the information chronological, but I decided to go with themes instead, otherwise i'd have to break up the Arthur section and that works as a stand alone segment. This is not complete yet, but I wasnt planning to add anymore titled sections, I will just work the rest of the storylines into the ones there. Feel free to let me know if you have any ideas for changes or inclusions. I'm not keen on the title 'early storylines', but I dont know where else to put this information, the stuff about fibroids and her being axed in 1989 isnt relevant to the other segments is it? Gung adin ♦ 17:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
This is near enough complete now. I've tried to include all the plot details. I hope it's ok, let me know what you think, and feel free to edit the sandbox if you want to change anything. Gung adin ♦ 17:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
This is mostly an FYI to you as an admin who still uses the old, templated method for salting pages. That method of salting pages is depricated, and the template is now up for deletion. While things can still change, the current discussion definitely looks headed towards deletion. Assuming that this happens, you will no longer be able to salt pages with the old method, and will need to begin using the newer salting method that involves cascading protection on the title, and allows recreation to be blocked while still having no article at the name, leaving it as a red link. This new method of salting is centered at WP:PT, and the instructions for how to make it work are there as well. - TexasAndroid 13:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm almost 100% sure User:Abi is very cuddly is a sockpuppet similar to one you recently banned. → jacĸrм ( talk | sign ) 23:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Another one, User:Abi is very very cuddly. → jacĸrм ( talk | sign ) 23:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm thinking of doing something to counter the numerous edits we've had which state the judges' categories on the main X Factor page. Do you know the template that directs readers to the talk page? It appears on the page in superscript and reads 'see discussion', or something like that. Thanks. Jonny - Wiki edit jonny 17:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
By the way, on the show they seem to be referring to the lower age groups as "Boys" and "Girls". What do you think about changing it to just that? — AnemoneProjectors ( 会話) 17:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I was warning User:Mrs trueman Jr when I noticed that it appeared they had a vendetta against reverting you. When I checked further I discovered that they were actually a sock puppet of User:Mrs Trueman31 (which was apparently a sock of User:Trueman31). The latter two were blocked, with Mrs Trueman31 getting an indefinite block from you. I just thought I'd let you know what was going on in case you didn't notice the reverting. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 12:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
I've posted a new discussion topic. So far, no-ones replied to it but it's still early days. Jonny - Wiki edit Jonny 18:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Could you tell me why you think the pic of Lewis at the showcase is unnecessary please? Thanks. Wiki edit Jonny 18:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
I suspect Treueman 31 VS AnemoneProjectors ( talk · contribs) is a sockpuppet of Trueman31 ( talk · contribs). Just informing you incase you didn't see :p — jacĸrм ( talk | sign ) 15:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:New ee web.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, can you semi-protect this page please? Some anon keeps removing the disambig to Michael French (actor) for no apparent reason. Gung adin ♦ 17:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the "Bleeding Love" review from the album but there are some comments about the album that you might like to add, such as "Good things are worth waiting for and this is no exception. The debut album is likely to surprise critics." I was going to do it myself but am too tired at the moment to put it into the right words! — AnemoneProjectors ( 会話) 23:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I was just wondering whether to include that vocal coach, Mark Hudson (the one with the colourful beard), will not be returning for the fourth series. He's a pretty minor character, but a character nonetheless. The story can be seen here [9] Merci beaucoup. Wiki edit Jonny 13:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Why have you added the "Critical reception" bit to Leona's album page? The article you are linking it to is a review of the single "Bleeding Love" and not the album, hence the title of the article "Leona Lewis is back with Bleeding Love". There have been no reviews of the album yet.
Oh and can I also ask why you changed the single cover of "Bleeding Love" back to a lower quality version where the text is smaller? The new one I got from her official site and that's why I uploaded it. As it stands, the cover on the article now is wrong and not the proper one. Adi39 20:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking the recent Trueman31 sockpuppets, but please note that User:Ln of x is a different sockpuppet to User:Trueman31. Ln of x always mentions Abi Branning, Lorna Fitzgerald or me, whereas Trueman31 is into more random vandalism or adding false information to articles. — AnemoneProjectors ( 会話) 18:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! :-) - Philippe | Talk 19:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
This matter was debated earlier, and was moved to Spears's. I am surprised that you felt it correct to move it and change all the Spears's references. Wiki style guides indicate that Spears's is the correct form and the move was originally done by an admin. I suggest you revert the move. Thanks 15:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits to Quinn's debut album? I don't think it is an album of covers, as all the songs on the album are known in many versions by many artists, not just one off renderings. Gareth E Kegg 18:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry about this! :) I mistakenly did a similar thing on someone else's user page. Sometimes the mouse button gets stuck or something, and I end up clicking on "rollback" by mistake! :) Acalamari 20:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
its a redirect, relax its hardly a big deal. -- Cloveious 12:30, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
How did you get the finalists all correct only half-way through the airing of the show? Jordan hatch 18:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
I wasn't sure if you were watching the discussion, so I just thought I should let you know I had a new idea, if you want to take a look at the talk page. Taric25 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 12:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, as you are an admin and have more power than I, would you be able do something about the crap mini-biographies some people have done for the Girls and the Over 25s in the X Factor 4 article? They've just copied and pasted it straight from the X Factor website with little editing at all. Not only this, they don't provide the information we need, like their age, their occupation etc. And, they haven't referenced it. All the best Wiki edit Jonny 18:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey AP, can you give your opinion/advice on this User talk:Gungadin#Advice on proof (Letitia Dean official fan site) Does Wiki have a way for checking whether so-called official sites are genuine? It seems genuine to me, but it keeps getting removed with no explanation. Gung adin ♦ 21:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Have you seen this? It's disgusting! I always knew that Icaro was plain crazy. [10] Wiki edit Jonny 19:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, how can I stop that persistent user who keeps making this [11] edit? I've reverted it something like three times now and I'm getting tired of it. Cheers - Wiki edit Jonny 11:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at this [12]. Do you think it's reliable? Seeing as Leona's perfoming at the first show the theme, Number 1s, would seem apt. Wiki edit Jonny 11:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
ANEMONE! THEY'VE REALEASED THE SONG CHOICES FOR THE FIRST LIVE SHOW [13]. Argh, I don't know what to do with all the information! Can you do one of your funky tables with all the live show details? Muchas thanks :-) — Wiki edit Jonny 18:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Same Difference were surprisingly okay. I think Kimberley was definitely the right choice as there's no way she could have won the competition (and she just looked plain odd with the Christina thing going on). WHAT HAPPENED WITH LEON?! Poor thing, he's got an amazing voice but his performance tonight was just a mess! Niki, Beverley, Rhydian and Hope stood out for me though (although ITV's gonna get a tonne of complaints for Raquelle's slapper top). What about you? Wiki edit Jonny 22:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Just think, all the people fuelling American pop culture will soon be looking at the Leona Lewis article to investigate who she is—can't wait! They're gonna prick up their ears when they hear Leona debuting on American media and we (in Britain) will be sitting looking pretty smug lol Wiki edit Jonny 19:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Big Brother UK contestants ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Number1spygirl 12:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Fame Academy participants ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Number1spygirl 12:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Pop Idol contestants ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Number1spygirl 12:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:The X Factor contestants ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Number1spygirl 12:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
What do you think of the songs for this week? [14] Personally I think Daniel's is a disaster and I don't know why Sharon's got Alisha singing a song that's 40 years old. All the others I'm happy with though. Wiki edit Jonny 09:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. Please see my comment at Talk:2007 in British music re: sortable tables. violet/riga (t) 14:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Come on MSN and I'll explain to you. Majorly ( talk) 19:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
As you're an admin, I thought I'd ask you... I'm looking to put one of those things to say that it doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards and/or it's under review at the top of the Spice Girls article. Have you seen the article?! It's terrible! It's been written by a load of non-registered users who don't know how to spell, write objectively or just write anything coherent at all! lol Wiki edit Jonny 23:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Why have you edited my page when you don't know me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.212.46.184 ( talk) 17:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you think it's necessary to have the results summary showing the bottom two? As the same information is given in the live show details. Wiki edit Jonny 20:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you have an opinion on this? You know what annoys me the most? The same people were commenting on the article both before and during the peer review, and none of this tense crap was brought up then. It seems like they wait til it gets to FAC to do it, just to be contrary. Gung adin ♦ 22:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Not too keen on Futureproof's song, but there are quite a few I've never even heard of - what's "Hanky Panky"?! Emily and Alisha finally have appropriate songs though. Never thought 'Reach' by S-Club 7 was a big band number! I like the fact that I haven't heard of a few of them, it's more original. [16] Wiki edit Jonny 12:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Tsk! The Futureproof one! It was originally created for Big Brother but it works for anything. Have you thought about putting something on your userpage?
anemone|
projectors
18:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I doubt it'll be a double elimination night on Saturday seeing as they've already lost Emily. Who'd have thought it eh? Scandalous! I wouldn't be surprised if Sharon asks for one of the girls from her visit to judge's home round to be allowed into the live shows to replace Nakanda Wiki edit Jonny 15:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I wrote some of this tonight. It's not complete yet. I want to add sections for some other prisoners and then do some brief descriptions about the firm characters and police/prison officers. Do you think that would be ok? and also can you reinstate the deleted images please ? :) Gung adin ♦ 22:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Hiya, I noticed you closed this AFD as "nomination withdrawn" which is definitely accurate - I'm not an expert on closing AFDs, but I get the feeling some sort of record ought to be left of this decision at the talk page Talk:Wank Week? I think it involves applying {{ Oldafdfull}} but I may be wrong! Ta, TheGrappler 02:51, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Not good news then? It should have been Andy in my opinion Wiki edit Jonny 22:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Why did you feel the need to undo my changes? Do you want me to GIVE you the acapella of it so you can see for yourself my friend?
"this original research is worse than the other original research, it also contains a personal interpretation of the meaning - this needs a source if it to be readded"
I will personally pitch down the acapella and add just the sample of the chorus for you just to make you happy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremador ( talk • contribs) 02:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Dude you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Why don't you fucking check the a capella for yourself and see that it says I'M BLUE IF I WOULD BLEED I WOULD DIE? Jesus some people in this world just shouldn't exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremador ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
And what does it say? I'M BLUE IF I WOULD BLEED I WOULD DIE. Stop editing the page and let people see for themselves jackass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremador ( talk • contribs) 20:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
The information *CAN* be verified. LISTEN TO THE A CAPELLA OF IT AND YOU WILL SEE WHAT IT SAYS. Extremador 21:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
There has been some problems with adding unsourced, and/or unreliable information to the List of Smallville episodes page. Robinepowell continually adds episode titles and airdates to the page without providing any source, or providing sources that completely fail Wikipedia's reliable sourcing guideline. As you can see on on her talk page, I have continued to try and explain to her the problems with each of the sources she's claiming to get the information from. First she pulled from Kryptonsite, which is a fansite. Then she pulled from spoilerfix, episode world, episode list, and scifistream.com. All appear to get their information from Kryptonsite, some explicitly saying so. The key to the majority of those sources she cites is that any registered person can edit and add more episodes on their pages. When I reviewed each sources "About us" page, it was clear that they were all fansites. You can see the sources on my talk page. She has since been claiming that a TV Guide source that says Smallville has enough scripts for 16 episodes is a translation that all the titles and airdates on those fansites is fair game to use--even though TV Guide does not mention any title or airdate for any episode in their article. This is become such a stupid edit war, and I'm only trying to preserve the integrity of the featured list. Am I wrong in this? I'm sorry to bug you with it, but you're one of the few Admins I know that appears around television related articles. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you please explain your revert of my edit, if not please self revert. Thank you and regards.-- Vintagekits 23:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Pretty happy with all of them, although they could have found a better song for Rhydian. [18] Wiki edit Jonny 11:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, AnemoneProjectors! Thanks for signing my signature book! I love your signature, its exquisite. Anyway, its a little late for this, but:
Dearest AnemoneProjectors,
Zachary
crimsonwolf wishes you a Happy
Halloween! Send this card to other spookers, even if it's a little late. Have a spooky Halloween and cheers!
Thanks to JetLover for his pumpkin image! Thanks to Dreadstar for his card format!
If this card comes to you, tell Zachary how you like his card!
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The X Factor (UK series 4). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Elanthiel 20:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Probably another sockpuppet of
User:Ln of x (my personal stalker).
anemone|
projectors
14:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you could clarify something for me. When editing wiki articles, am I correct in thinking that it is inappropriate to include external links to fansites? I was under the impression that if people are contributing to an article about a singer or actor for example, then only their official website should be included as well as any relevant published sources (such as newspaper articles, interviews, IMDb page, etc). I have come across a few pages recently that have links to fan websites and always thought that this was considered to be inappropriate linkage to Wiki articles as they are not technically official sources - regardless of how well made they are. Thank you. 79.69.45.4 23:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
What on earth have they done for Rydian? That song is horrific! [19] Wiki edit Jonny 11:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
It seems TWINKLE isn't very helpful when reporting sockpuppets! Sorry for the confusion in tags added to various user pages - it was the first time I'd used TWINKLE for reporting sockpuppets and I don't think I will again! Stephenb (Talk) 19:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for taking some photos of Stevenage. I wanted to (and it would be easy as I live there), but I don't own a camera. Did you come on a Sunday? It's a shame, because the place looks empty and it's not typical. A busy Saturday afternoon would have been better! You'll have to come back!
anemone|
projectors
23:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Apologies, guess that's what having to play commercial disco music on a Friday night does to me - definitely a good fact for pub quiz trivia though :) Cheers, Richsage ( talk) 20:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
May I ask why you got rid of the table that I created for next weeks show?-- Hiltonhampton ( talk) 20:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! Jack ?! 00:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
To AnemoneProjectors for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Thanks! Jack ?! 00:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC) |
I've started on my user page but I don't know how to liven it up into a better format. Any pointers? :) Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 01:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you undelete these for me when youy get the chance please? :)
Image:Devcorrie.jpg Image:Doreenfenwick.jpg Image:Yana corrie.jpg Gung adin ♦ 18:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure who the original artists are of Leon and Hope's songs. But I think it's good to see Rhydian doing a straight-up vocal performance rather than prancing around on stage. There's no way Beverley can pull off that number, her voice is no way near good enough. Niki's is likely to sound dated. Same Difference will probably pull that one off because they did it at their judges' homes audition. [20] Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 11:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
WHAT THE HELL ARE HOPE STILL DOING IN THE COMPETITION?!?! It's so obvious that the public don't like them because they've been in the bottom two three times now. It doesn't matter how bloody good you are, if no-one likes you then no-one's gonna buy your singles! Beverly sounded a lot worse over the TV than what the judges were hearing — they loved her performance when it sounded terrible from where I was sitting. On a firmly positive note, Same Difference were seriously good tonight! I have finally been won-over by those two because they actually delivered a decent vocal performace rather than larked around with props on stage. Rhydian was so-so tonight in my opinion; he can do a lot better than that because his performance wasn't original. Niki as well lost it halfway through her song and it sounded rough. I'm starting to like Leon a lot now. He's a better jazz-singer than a pop singer, hopefully we won't have another Ray Quinn on our hands! I've got to say though, I loved the whole deadlock thing, it was so dramatic and the suspense was way better than the normal voting. Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 21:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
List of births, marriages and deaths in EastEnders, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of births, marriages and deaths in EastEnders satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of births, marriages and deaths in EastEnders and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of births, marriages and deaths in EastEnders during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. AnmaFinotera ( talk) 22:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Heylo, do you think we could get away with unprotecting the article now? Hopefully that idiot who kept making the Jacksons edit will have made a much-needed exit lol. Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 15:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I suggest removing the "Michael Vincent" altogether until a source better than The Sun reports it, unless it was mentioned live on the programme. Brad ( talk) 00:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi AnemoneProjectors. Please consider adding your admin username to the growing list at Classification of admins. Best! -- Jreferee t/ c 23:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I quite like most of the songs they've chosen; not because I like the songs individually, but because they're different. That is all apart from Louis who yet again, has chosen safe and somewhat dated songs for Niki. GRRGH [21] Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 12:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Look, it's happened Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor EastEnders characters. This person must be trying to get adminship or something, upping their involvement in AFDs to up their stats. I'm getting really pissed off with this whole project. Gung adin ♦ 21:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
That's what i have been dreading. They may regret it when they have to do hundreds of AFDs for all the minor characters who will probably get their own page if there's no list to put them in. The fact that we had to merge so many should be an indication to them. But that's a good idea about the spin offs. Gung adin ♦ 22:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
this dude is just nasty. Gung adin ♦ 23:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Like I said to Gungadin, I'm laying off EastEnders for now. But the two of you should be able to find sources, or not, for the three characters I already nominated. I hope you noticed I left Wellard and Willy alone, since they seem to be notable. Fee Fi Foe Fum 00:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Can you come to that talk page to discuss please? Rhanyeia ♥ ♫ 17:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
A bit predictable but should be a good show [24]. Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 12:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Glad Niki went. Ironically, she gave her best performance on her last one... at least she went out with a bang! Personally I thought the performances this week was seriously dreary! The first half was all slow funeral songs that barely had a melody. It got better in the second half but it wasn't great. What on earth was going on with those dancers during Rhydian's "Bridge Over Troubled Water"?! Leon had a pretty bad week but the public love him, as they do Same Difference. I really don't care about what Louis says at all now, he's sunk so far in my estimation that just don't care if he exists (harsh, I know). At least he won't be back for series 5. What a pathetic man, he better give SD their due in the final next week. Although, it won't make any difference because the public obviously haven't been listening to what he says about them anyway. Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 22:44, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Can you just expain to me what fair use images are and why they are not allowed on my page. Thanks In23065 ( talk) 19:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
This is the last time we'll do this! [25] Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 12:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
I'd simply like to mention that your signature is unique and asthetically pleasing. нмŵוτн τ 17:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
WHAT DID I TELL YOU?! WHAT DID I F**KING TELL YOU?!?!?! MAYBE I SHOULD TURN OFF CAPS LOCK haha Wiki edit Jonny ( talk) 22:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. In23065 ( talk) 15:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Look at this, I made this fabulous card all for you. It took me ages. Okay, I stole it off someones talk page :) Merry Christmas, and I just wanted to say that Leon sucks and Rydian shoulda won X-Factor. I think this looks like him [26] Gung adin ♦ 22:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks! Yeah that does look like Rhydian. But actually Futureproof should have won. Leon's better than Rhydian anyway.
anemone│
projectors
22:35, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
if he's going to go riding a sleigh with a naked cupid on his lap then what does he expect! Gung adin ♦ 23:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Ok then. Weirdy Talk 04:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I'd be inclined to reinstate the page and punt it off to AFD, because I see an edit war looming. (FWIW I'd vote weak keep but I think your reasons are sound and stand a good chance of being accepted. In fact, if you nominate it I won't vote - howsat? :-) ) Ros0709 ( talk) 21:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Why was the X Factor Series 5 article deleted? it will easily be created again by someone else, as there will be a series 5. But why did you delete the article? ( Shadowmoon13 ( talk) 21:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC))
No it wasn't. There will be an X Factor series 5, and someone will easily create it again. Its best to create it now. ( Shadowmoon13 ( talk) 08:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC))
Are you sure about that? I haven't seen any reference to it on-screen. Maybe I don't pay attention though.
anemone│
projectors
00:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Template:Rescue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Benjiboi 21:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
You and I have reverted many attempts to promote some X Factor fansites. It seemed pretty clear to me they were being promoted by the creator and thus fell foul of WP:COI but that concern aside, are they actually bad links? I've decided to let it be - but if the links should be purged then perhaps Shadowbot should be employed? Ros0709 ( talk) 23:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
hi, i was wondering why everytime i try to add the fonejacker fansite to the fonejacker wiki page you remove it. do you not consider it to be a fonejacker resource? i see that almost every wiki pages has a link to a fansite in some way. do you have a personal vendetta againt me adding this resource? please dont take this message to be insulting in anyway. i just wish to know why. kind regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.95.165 ( talk) 12:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey there.
Could you tell me who you believe that user to be a sock of? — Coren (talk) 17:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the portal spacing at Portal:Television. Cirt ( talk) 21:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC).
Hi! I was wondering if I could ask you a question about the above, which you protected from creation in September. I came across Big Brother 2008 UK while looking through New Pages, and after editing a little, tried to move it to Big Brother 2008 (UK) to be consistent with the titles of other years of the series. I don't know a lot about Big Brother, and I'm not an admin, so I'm not sure if:
Hi Anemone - I've been looking for the Maltese Singles Chart to help update the Bleeding Love page but can't find it - the link given on the wiki page doesn;t lead to the chart. Can you help? Leipzigger98 20:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)