Here are the copies of some of articles that were (or can be) removed. Hope nobody will remove them from here
Hey there Belamp, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Belamp/dwm. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 04:57, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Andrew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to discuss your move of the page blueberry to Vaccinium Cyanococcus. I dispute this move because "blueberry", although it might not be used all around the world, is the common name used by reliable sources. If you take a look at the reference section, all of the sources use the word blueberry. Also, as an example, the article apple is titled apple because most, if not all, sources use "apple". Can you explain, in detail, why you moved it? Thanks. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 19:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC) P.S. Give me a {{tb}} once you respond.
I noticed the controversial move and just saw this conversation so I thought I'd drop a note. I reverted the move for a few reasons. First, it was completely undiscussed. See WP:RM. It was also not in line with WP:FLORA, the flora naming convention. Normally I'd be happy about an article title being shifted toward the scientific name, but blueberry seems to be the most commonly used name to refer to this collection of species (a key point) in reliable sources. This is not about what it's known in your part of the world or in mine. It's about what this group of species is collectively called in reliable sources. The article blueberry isn't just about the North American species; it's circumscription is about the section so it would encompass the proposal above, it just needs to be improved. I would say it should remain at it's title, however, probably per WP:ENGVAR. Similar situations at other fruit and vegetable articles have ended up in keeping the article at the original title, e.g. the article is the American term rutabaga not swede and all together separate from the other vegetable turnip. Complicated stuff, no doubt! Cheers, Rkitko ( talk) 15:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Done: The entire discussion has been moved, per request, to the relevant section on the Instruction on transliteration of Belarusian geographical names with letters of Latin script 'Talk page'. -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 00:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Mantis Bug Tracker, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. I'm not sure why you would replace a link to RhodeCode with a link to Kallithea (software) when the reference is clearly about RhodeCode. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 13:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
The article Kallithea (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
intgr
[talk]
10:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
on this revert ? -- Jakubt ( talk) 03:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Belamp. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Speed limits in Slovakia, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little Interpreted Language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Interpreted Language until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ― Padenton| ✉ 15:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, instead of removing references with broken links as here, please check if the reference can be found at another URL, or instead replace them with links to archived versions e.g. on web.archive.org. In this case I could trivially find the reference's new URL by searching the web for the article title. Wikipedia articles with insufficient references may be deleted. -- Vladimir ( talk) 07:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Love your articles on trams. Please remember not to link years, dates, and common terms ("tram", for example, is ok linked in this context, though). Flags—we try to minimise them unless there's a particular reasons for inclusion. Year ranges, no gaps (2013–2014).
Thanks. Tony (talk) 06:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marian Kotleba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SME. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
What is the reason for your repeated edit warring without even giving a reason?
Please have a look at the article and learn that even the article mentions that the code started in 1998.
Here is a quote from a mailing list from 1998 that verifies that there is no fact based reason for your behavior:
From lm Mon Jun 15 08:12:51 1998 Return-Path: <lm@dnai.com> Received: from dnai.com (lm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bitmover.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA03585; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:12:48 -0700 Message-Id: <199806151512.IAA03585@bitmover.com> To: charath <charath@siptech.co.in> From: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy) cc: bitkeeper-users@bitmover.com Subject: Re: Problem with BitSCCS on NT4? Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:12:47 -0700 Sender: lm@dnai.com : I tried to compile BitSCCS on a Windows NT 4.0 machine using the Cygwin32 : Beta 19 pack (gcc). The package compiled without a hitch. However, : when I try to use it I encounter a problem. : The system is able to run sccssh and to edit & get existing sccs files : (created by a Solaris system). When I create a new file & try to check it : in (using the delta -i command), it creates a new SCCS directory and a : new s. file. However, when I try to edit this file (using edit or get), : I get a message saying the the checksum on the s file is incorrect and : that the s-file is missing! Yeah, I ran into this with my original NT port which has since become out of date. If I remember correctly, the problem was an fseek() interfaction. I think that I talked to a file both through the file descriptor and through the FILE * at one point. This confused Cygwin32. If this is the same problem, you'll see
Now check the name of the mailing list....it is: bitkeeper-users.
Given the fact that you did not act as a collaborative person and did not write down a reason for your actions, you appear as a person that mainly intends to do vandalism. Schily ( talk) 14:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fleabag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Scott ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BiglyBT. Since you had some involvement with the BiglyBT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. The Banner talk 21:15, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
"Bill Withers, the acclaimed 1970s soul singer behind hits Ain't No Sunshine and Lean On Me has died from heart complications aged 81, his family said. The singer died on Monday in Los Angeles, the family told the Associated Press." Monday = March 30. Thanks. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 14:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure if this is the usual way how to discuss changes / reverts in an article, if not, please let me know how to do it properly. Your edit changed the reference to the country Jozef Puska is coming from to his alleged nationality. I would like to know why you assume his nationality is Slovak? Did you talk to him? In Slovakia are living also other nationalities, ca. 17% of the total population. I propose to revert the edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ombia ( talk • contribs) 00:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Well, nationality is country of citizenship, and he's known to have Slovak citizenship, but I agree we know nothing of his ethnicity. I have changed the link to point to the country and not the ethnic group. Andrej Shadura ( talk) 07:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Here are the copies of some of articles that were (or can be) removed. Hope nobody will remove them from here
Hey there Belamp, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Belamp/dwm. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 04:57, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Andrew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to discuss your move of the page blueberry to Vaccinium Cyanococcus. I dispute this move because "blueberry", although it might not be used all around the world, is the common name used by reliable sources. If you take a look at the reference section, all of the sources use the word blueberry. Also, as an example, the article apple is titled apple because most, if not all, sources use "apple". Can you explain, in detail, why you moved it? Thanks. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 19:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC) P.S. Give me a {{tb}} once you respond.
I noticed the controversial move and just saw this conversation so I thought I'd drop a note. I reverted the move for a few reasons. First, it was completely undiscussed. See WP:RM. It was also not in line with WP:FLORA, the flora naming convention. Normally I'd be happy about an article title being shifted toward the scientific name, but blueberry seems to be the most commonly used name to refer to this collection of species (a key point) in reliable sources. This is not about what it's known in your part of the world or in mine. It's about what this group of species is collectively called in reliable sources. The article blueberry isn't just about the North American species; it's circumscription is about the section so it would encompass the proposal above, it just needs to be improved. I would say it should remain at it's title, however, probably per WP:ENGVAR. Similar situations at other fruit and vegetable articles have ended up in keeping the article at the original title, e.g. the article is the American term rutabaga not swede and all together separate from the other vegetable turnip. Complicated stuff, no doubt! Cheers, Rkitko ( talk) 15:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Done: The entire discussion has been moved, per request, to the relevant section on the Instruction on transliteration of Belarusian geographical names with letters of Latin script 'Talk page'. -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 00:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Mantis Bug Tracker, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. I'm not sure why you would replace a link to RhodeCode with a link to Kallithea (software) when the reference is clearly about RhodeCode. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 13:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
The article Kallithea (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
intgr
[talk]
10:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
on this revert ? -- Jakubt ( talk) 03:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Belamp. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Speed limits in Slovakia, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little Interpreted Language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Interpreted Language until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ― Padenton| ✉ 15:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, instead of removing references with broken links as here, please check if the reference can be found at another URL, or instead replace them with links to archived versions e.g. on web.archive.org. In this case I could trivially find the reference's new URL by searching the web for the article title. Wikipedia articles with insufficient references may be deleted. -- Vladimir ( talk) 07:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Love your articles on trams. Please remember not to link years, dates, and common terms ("tram", for example, is ok linked in this context, though). Flags—we try to minimise them unless there's a particular reasons for inclusion. Year ranges, no gaps (2013–2014).
Thanks. Tony (talk) 06:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marian Kotleba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SME. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
What is the reason for your repeated edit warring without even giving a reason?
Please have a look at the article and learn that even the article mentions that the code started in 1998.
Here is a quote from a mailing list from 1998 that verifies that there is no fact based reason for your behavior:
From lm Mon Jun 15 08:12:51 1998 Return-Path: <lm@dnai.com> Received: from dnai.com (lm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bitmover.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA03585; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:12:48 -0700 Message-Id: <199806151512.IAA03585@bitmover.com> To: charath <charath@siptech.co.in> From: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy) cc: bitkeeper-users@bitmover.com Subject: Re: Problem with BitSCCS on NT4? Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:12:47 -0700 Sender: lm@dnai.com : I tried to compile BitSCCS on a Windows NT 4.0 machine using the Cygwin32 : Beta 19 pack (gcc). The package compiled without a hitch. However, : when I try to use it I encounter a problem. : The system is able to run sccssh and to edit & get existing sccs files : (created by a Solaris system). When I create a new file & try to check it : in (using the delta -i command), it creates a new SCCS directory and a : new s. file. However, when I try to edit this file (using edit or get), : I get a message saying the the checksum on the s file is incorrect and : that the s-file is missing! Yeah, I ran into this with my original NT port which has since become out of date. If I remember correctly, the problem was an fseek() interfaction. I think that I talked to a file both through the file descriptor and through the FILE * at one point. This confused Cygwin32. If this is the same problem, you'll see
Now check the name of the mailing list....it is: bitkeeper-users.
Given the fact that you did not act as a collaborative person and did not write down a reason for your actions, you appear as a person that mainly intends to do vandalism. Schily ( talk) 14:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fleabag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Scott ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BiglyBT. Since you had some involvement with the BiglyBT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. The Banner talk 21:15, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
"Bill Withers, the acclaimed 1970s soul singer behind hits Ain't No Sunshine and Lean On Me has died from heart complications aged 81, his family said. The singer died on Monday in Los Angeles, the family told the Associated Press." Monday = March 30. Thanks. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 14:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure if this is the usual way how to discuss changes / reverts in an article, if not, please let me know how to do it properly. Your edit changed the reference to the country Jozef Puska is coming from to his alleged nationality. I would like to know why you assume his nationality is Slovak? Did you talk to him? In Slovakia are living also other nationalities, ca. 17% of the total population. I propose to revert the edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ombia ( talk • contribs) 00:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Well, nationality is country of citizenship, and he's known to have Slovak citizenship, but I agree we know nothing of his ethnicity. I have changed the link to point to the country and not the ethnic group. Andrej Shadura ( talk) 07:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)