Hello, I'm StefenTower. I noticed that you recently removed content from Whitefield Academy (Kentucky) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 23:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm StefenTower. I noticed that you recently removed content from Whitefield Academy (Kentucky) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You replaced sourced content with a triviality. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 20:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly attempting to perform disruptive actions may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Toadette ^{( Let's talk together!)} 23:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to attempt to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Toadette ^{( Let's talk together!)} 23:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you attempt to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia. Toadette ^{( Let's talk together!)} 23:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Whitefield Academy (Kentucky). Me Da Wikipedian ( talk) 23:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

To be clear, WP:IDONTLIKEIT is an invalid reason to blank out sourced content, a form of vandalism. If particular well-sourced facts are attributable to a school, them's just the breaks, and your appreciation of them is not pertinent to an encyclopedia.

Also, your personal attack on my user talk page was, let's say, as intellectually lazy as you think I physically am. Good to see particular folks are still acting like competence is a crime, tho. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 00:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

  ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply