This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 |
We're quite efficiently purging the move request backlog, aren't we? FBDB — JFG talk 15:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
unfortunately, currently i dont have much time to spend on wikipedia. But I still trying my best to process the easy ones when I have limited time, and when I have more time I can process more controversial. @
JFG: Actually, that discussion wasnt much fun. The trouble was
here after the discussion was closed. And now I forgot why was I here on Amakuru's talkpage lol. I will ask when I remember again. See you guys around. :)
—usernamekiran
(talk)
23:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
The backlog is currently at two JFG, and Amakuru. The two discussions are sort of out of my depth so I left them for an experienced editor. —usernamekiran (talk) 18:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Didn't see that was closed - thanks!! SEMMENDINGER ( talk) 13:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
The discussion has been on for seven days now and I think it's clear that the result is to change the title to "pro-democracy camp (Hong Kong)". Lmmnhn ( talk) 02:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC) |
@ Cullen328: you're welcome, and a massive congratulations to you - here's a beer (or nonalcoholic beverage if you prefer) to celebrate. I imagine RfA is always a stressful experience even if you do get over 300 supports and 2 opposes... If you need any assistance from me, just let me know, but I think you already know what you're doing better than many existing admins already so you'll be fine. Welcome to the corps! — Amakuru ( talk) 10:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. Following change the name of the article about Dnipro could you change categories about the city? I have no permission to do it because target names are busy (i.e.: Category:Buildings and structures in Dnipro). List of Ykvach's contributions could helpful in finding categories to move: https://en.wikipedia.org/?limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Ykvach&namespace=&tagfilter=&start=2016-05-01&end=2016-05-31 . Greetings, Ales sandro ( talk) 19:57, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Where... exactly is the claim of significance in this is a website that was founded this year that does stuff and also exists
?
TimothyJosephWood
10:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bernard Lafferty (butler). Since you had some involvement with the Bernard Lafferty (butler) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Home Lander ( talk) 23:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
it is my understanding that on spring 2016, you closed the discussion about whether to move the page Evergreen 747 Supertanker to "Boeing 747 Supertanker", because there was no consensus about it. I think time has come to reopen the case.
The main arguments for the "oppose" side were that the new aircraft would be a different one and would have its own page (or section in the general 747-400 page), and that the new company may keep the Evergreen name. Since then, it has become clear that this page was used for the Global Supertanker Services' aircraft as well, and that GSS does not plan to use the Evergreen name in any way (they don't even mention the Evergreen legacy on their website).
Therefore, I think that makes no sense to keep using the "Evergreen" title and a more generic name like "Boeing 747 Supertanker" not only could, but should be chosen. Have a nice day, Herisson26 ( talk) 14:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi.
I just asked a question to Dr. Strauss on his
talkpage here. Would you please take a look at it, and comment there? Not about that particular case, but about a generalised situation. Thanks. —usernamekiran
(talk)
12:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Rwandan Civil War at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:04, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).
Since you participated in the discussion at Talk:J.J. Watt#Requested move 2 December 2016, the current exchange, at Talk:T. J. Miller#Requested move 6 September 2017, may be of interest. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 02:01, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
On 14 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rwandan Civil War, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that following the Rwandan Civil War, two million Hutu refugees fled to neighboring countries (Rwandan refugee camp pictured), fearing reprisals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rwandan Civil War. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Rwandan Civil War), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 00:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi - did you mean "not a proper name" or "a proper name"? Your down-casing suggests the latter. Doug Weller talk 10:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Amakuru. Would you mind leaving a message at said discussion? Thanks. -- Nevé – selbert 08:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Amakuru, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh 666 22:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
What are your further thoughts on this? (Respond at linked page). I've posted some dictionary entry links you might want to take a look at. The Transhumanist 17:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I had requested the page move to X-ray specs, but you moved it to X-Ray specs. Isn't that a mistake? If there's no problem, please move the page to X-ray specs as requested and supported by some people in the talk page. For what it's worth, we also have the page X-ray, not X-Ray. -- Daniel Carrero ( talk) 20:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).
Hi, thanks for taking care of the requested move backlog. As I wrote in the move request, I would also like to have my sandbox moved under the title "Presidential Directive", effectively occupying the place left vacant. I would like the history starting from here to be preserved (although, you may copy the entire history if that's easier—I virtually didn't touch my sandbox before writing the article). I realize now that this may be a difficult request, given that the current redirect contains some history from before a merge. Cheers, Uglemat ( talk) 20:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Grand Duchy of Kraków. Because you participated in the requested move, you might want to participate in the move review. Academicoffee71 ( talk) 05:07, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
I am using bold text at WikiProject Trucks to play to the audience, not to address you personally. It is very confused there. Could you please ignore any bold? Thank you. EDIT: It is almost impossible to edit there. Any chance you could break it up a little? You would not look biased, I certainly would. I don't know how, anyway. Thank you. Sammy D III ( talk) 13:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Oppose? The team was founded in 1966 as Olimpia Râmnicu Sărat, then in the 00's changed its name in CSM Râmnicu Sărat, was dissolved and refounded in 2010 as Olimpia 2010 Râmnicu Sărat and in this summer the club made a request at the Romanian Football Federation to change its name again in CSM Râmnicu Sărat, request that was approved, thing demonstrated through the links that are from the official Romanian Football Federation websites, not gambling sites...it's not a translation problem, the club changed its name pure and simple, now is CSM Râmnicu Sărat, C=Clubul (The Club), S=Sportiv (Sports), M=Municipal (of the Municiplaity) and Râmnicu Sărat is the city name. Olimpia come from Olympics and means something different. But the problem is that CSM Râmnicu Sărat page exist, because the club was named in this way in the past and I can not make a classic move page procedure. Rhinen
Hi, you deleted the redirect Infobox Brewery to Template:Infobox Brewery with listed reason "R2". "This applies to Redirects, apart from shortcuts, from the main namespace to any other namespace except the Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal: namespaces." This was a redirect from the main namespace to Template, one of the exceptions specifically listed to R2. I'm not terribly torn up about this, mind you, I just find myself frequently forgetting the Template: part (same with " cite news") and I figured it wouldn't be an issue. I'm not trying to contest or appeal this, just curious about the listed exceptions, or if this was an oversight.- Ich ( talk) 19:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Confirmation edit. — Amakuru ( talk) 20:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi again Amakuru. Not sure if you're aware, but the move request at Talk:List of First World War Victoria Cross recipients was closed recently as no consensus. I asked DrStrauss on his talkpage whether he would consider reopening the discussion, but I don't expect a reply soon as he is currently suffering from medical issues. However, another user by the name of A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver wrote an extraordinarily impassioned comment against relisting the move on the basis that "British Great War Veterans would literally turn in their graves over this abysmal idea", going on to say "I seriously reject trying to reduce the mass killing of millions of people to a roman numeral". Not really sure how to respond to this.-- Nevé – selbert 21:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for moving List of populated places in New Mexico. It looks like Talk:List of populated places in New Mexico by population didn't get moved to the new title, though— Talk:List of populated places in New Mexico is still showing as a redirect to Talk:List of census-designated places in New Mexico, which is no longer correct. Do you mind taking a look at this? Thanks! Camerafiend ( talk) 20:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi - thanks for taking the time on the close here. One question, though, re: common name. Both my and SMC's stats showed a mixed bag: UNCF is more common in news, but less common in books and journals, even as of today. That would suggest there either isn't a common name, or both names are common names - depending on how you view WP:COMMONNAME. Either way, I don't see how that supports a consensus to move, especially if you are discounting the "it's not 1957"-type !votes. I'd appreciate your thoughts there. Dohn joe ( talk) 14:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
I'd like you to review your close of this RM. While you said in the last line "larger number of votes in favour", discounting the "strength" of the votes, the total is even at 6-6. 4 of the the Support votes lack any given merit - exactly the type you said "carry less weight". In particular, Randy Kryn's vote simply addresses the SMcCandlish in a way that suggests that vote was solicited elsewhere and just dropped in as a favor to the nominator. None of the Oppose votes are "less weight" as they each give their views by citing WP policies and external sources. At the very least this should have been closed as no consensus, whereas I consider this a clear Not Moved based on the votes being weighted. -- Netoholic @ 12:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
As it's been several months since we talked about this, I wanted to make sure you're aware of this RfC on British railway station names here. Cheers,-- Cúchullain t/ c 18:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Re: 'You say "we've been moving away from unnecessarily parenthetical disambiguation inexorably in many topics" - please could you provide some examples of that?' See years of moves catalogued at WP:BREEDDAB for starters. WT:RM also has a semi-useful search function; you can find a lot more by searching for "natural" and "comma" and "parenthetic" or "parenthetical" and more specific keywords like WP:NATURAL, WP:NATURALDIS, and WP:NATURALDAB. Due to the decentralized way in which RM works, we really don't have a proper archive of RM, and that search seems to be the best we can do. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 21:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Amakuru:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
Halloween!
– —usernamekiran
(talk)
12:43, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).
Hi! I would like to kindly request that you please stop reverting my edits made to railway stations in Turkey. They have been completely uncontroversial until you started reverting them. I will start a discussion for the multi-moves on the requested moves page. Until a consensus is reached, please stop reverting the edits. I spent around three hours changing all those names and I dont want to have to do it again. Thank you for your understanding. ( Central Data Bank ( talk) 17:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC))
Hi! After reading the feedback on my suggested move, it looks as though it will not be changed to my suggested format. Therefore I will redirect the pages I have reverted, however I would like to ask if there is a bot or a quicker way to revert them all because doing it manually takes a lot of time. Also, for some stations such as Basmane station and Koşu station, I am unable to revert them. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! ( Central Data Bank ( talk) 13:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC))
I don't know if this edit and this one are something you've done on other dabs, but I don't believe it is incorrect. The title of a show, by itself, is not generally used to refer to individual seasons of a show, so these articles are not considered to be ambiguous with the title, and are not generally listed on a dab. — swpb T go beyond 14:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 |
We're quite efficiently purging the move request backlog, aren't we? FBDB — JFG talk 15:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
unfortunately, currently i dont have much time to spend on wikipedia. But I still trying my best to process the easy ones when I have limited time, and when I have more time I can process more controversial. @
JFG: Actually, that discussion wasnt much fun. The trouble was
here after the discussion was closed. And now I forgot why was I here on Amakuru's talkpage lol. I will ask when I remember again. See you guys around. :)
—usernamekiran
(talk)
23:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
The backlog is currently at two JFG, and Amakuru. The two discussions are sort of out of my depth so I left them for an experienced editor. —usernamekiran (talk) 18:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Didn't see that was closed - thanks!! SEMMENDINGER ( talk) 13:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
The discussion has been on for seven days now and I think it's clear that the result is to change the title to "pro-democracy camp (Hong Kong)". Lmmnhn ( talk) 02:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC) |
@ Cullen328: you're welcome, and a massive congratulations to you - here's a beer (or nonalcoholic beverage if you prefer) to celebrate. I imagine RfA is always a stressful experience even if you do get over 300 supports and 2 opposes... If you need any assistance from me, just let me know, but I think you already know what you're doing better than many existing admins already so you'll be fine. Welcome to the corps! — Amakuru ( talk) 10:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. Following change the name of the article about Dnipro could you change categories about the city? I have no permission to do it because target names are busy (i.e.: Category:Buildings and structures in Dnipro). List of Ykvach's contributions could helpful in finding categories to move: https://en.wikipedia.org/?limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Ykvach&namespace=&tagfilter=&start=2016-05-01&end=2016-05-31 . Greetings, Ales sandro ( talk) 19:57, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Where... exactly is the claim of significance in this is a website that was founded this year that does stuff and also exists
?
TimothyJosephWood
10:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bernard Lafferty (butler). Since you had some involvement with the Bernard Lafferty (butler) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Home Lander ( talk) 23:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
it is my understanding that on spring 2016, you closed the discussion about whether to move the page Evergreen 747 Supertanker to "Boeing 747 Supertanker", because there was no consensus about it. I think time has come to reopen the case.
The main arguments for the "oppose" side were that the new aircraft would be a different one and would have its own page (or section in the general 747-400 page), and that the new company may keep the Evergreen name. Since then, it has become clear that this page was used for the Global Supertanker Services' aircraft as well, and that GSS does not plan to use the Evergreen name in any way (they don't even mention the Evergreen legacy on their website).
Therefore, I think that makes no sense to keep using the "Evergreen" title and a more generic name like "Boeing 747 Supertanker" not only could, but should be chosen. Have a nice day, Herisson26 ( talk) 14:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi.
I just asked a question to Dr. Strauss on his
talkpage here. Would you please take a look at it, and comment there? Not about that particular case, but about a generalised situation. Thanks. —usernamekiran
(talk)
12:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Rwandan Civil War at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:04, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).
Since you participated in the discussion at Talk:J.J. Watt#Requested move 2 December 2016, the current exchange, at Talk:T. J. Miller#Requested move 6 September 2017, may be of interest. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 02:01, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
On 14 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rwandan Civil War, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that following the Rwandan Civil War, two million Hutu refugees fled to neighboring countries (Rwandan refugee camp pictured), fearing reprisals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rwandan Civil War. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Rwandan Civil War), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 00:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi - did you mean "not a proper name" or "a proper name"? Your down-casing suggests the latter. Doug Weller talk 10:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Amakuru. Would you mind leaving a message at said discussion? Thanks. -- Nevé – selbert 08:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Amakuru, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh 666 22:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
What are your further thoughts on this? (Respond at linked page). I've posted some dictionary entry links you might want to take a look at. The Transhumanist 17:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I had requested the page move to X-ray specs, but you moved it to X-Ray specs. Isn't that a mistake? If there's no problem, please move the page to X-ray specs as requested and supported by some people in the talk page. For what it's worth, we also have the page X-ray, not X-Ray. -- Daniel Carrero ( talk) 20:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).
Hi, thanks for taking care of the requested move backlog. As I wrote in the move request, I would also like to have my sandbox moved under the title "Presidential Directive", effectively occupying the place left vacant. I would like the history starting from here to be preserved (although, you may copy the entire history if that's easier—I virtually didn't touch my sandbox before writing the article). I realize now that this may be a difficult request, given that the current redirect contains some history from before a merge. Cheers, Uglemat ( talk) 20:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Grand Duchy of Kraków. Because you participated in the requested move, you might want to participate in the move review. Academicoffee71 ( talk) 05:07, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
I am using bold text at WikiProject Trucks to play to the audience, not to address you personally. It is very confused there. Could you please ignore any bold? Thank you. EDIT: It is almost impossible to edit there. Any chance you could break it up a little? You would not look biased, I certainly would. I don't know how, anyway. Thank you. Sammy D III ( talk) 13:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Oppose? The team was founded in 1966 as Olimpia Râmnicu Sărat, then in the 00's changed its name in CSM Râmnicu Sărat, was dissolved and refounded in 2010 as Olimpia 2010 Râmnicu Sărat and in this summer the club made a request at the Romanian Football Federation to change its name again in CSM Râmnicu Sărat, request that was approved, thing demonstrated through the links that are from the official Romanian Football Federation websites, not gambling sites...it's not a translation problem, the club changed its name pure and simple, now is CSM Râmnicu Sărat, C=Clubul (The Club), S=Sportiv (Sports), M=Municipal (of the Municiplaity) and Râmnicu Sărat is the city name. Olimpia come from Olympics and means something different. But the problem is that CSM Râmnicu Sărat page exist, because the club was named in this way in the past and I can not make a classic move page procedure. Rhinen
Hi, you deleted the redirect Infobox Brewery to Template:Infobox Brewery with listed reason "R2". "This applies to Redirects, apart from shortcuts, from the main namespace to any other namespace except the Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal: namespaces." This was a redirect from the main namespace to Template, one of the exceptions specifically listed to R2. I'm not terribly torn up about this, mind you, I just find myself frequently forgetting the Template: part (same with " cite news") and I figured it wouldn't be an issue. I'm not trying to contest or appeal this, just curious about the listed exceptions, or if this was an oversight.- Ich ( talk) 19:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Confirmation edit. — Amakuru ( talk) 20:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi again Amakuru. Not sure if you're aware, but the move request at Talk:List of First World War Victoria Cross recipients was closed recently as no consensus. I asked DrStrauss on his talkpage whether he would consider reopening the discussion, but I don't expect a reply soon as he is currently suffering from medical issues. However, another user by the name of A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver wrote an extraordinarily impassioned comment against relisting the move on the basis that "British Great War Veterans would literally turn in their graves over this abysmal idea", going on to say "I seriously reject trying to reduce the mass killing of millions of people to a roman numeral". Not really sure how to respond to this.-- Nevé – selbert 21:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for moving List of populated places in New Mexico. It looks like Talk:List of populated places in New Mexico by population didn't get moved to the new title, though— Talk:List of populated places in New Mexico is still showing as a redirect to Talk:List of census-designated places in New Mexico, which is no longer correct. Do you mind taking a look at this? Thanks! Camerafiend ( talk) 20:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi - thanks for taking the time on the close here. One question, though, re: common name. Both my and SMC's stats showed a mixed bag: UNCF is more common in news, but less common in books and journals, even as of today. That would suggest there either isn't a common name, or both names are common names - depending on how you view WP:COMMONNAME. Either way, I don't see how that supports a consensus to move, especially if you are discounting the "it's not 1957"-type !votes. I'd appreciate your thoughts there. Dohn joe ( talk) 14:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
I'd like you to review your close of this RM. While you said in the last line "larger number of votes in favour", discounting the "strength" of the votes, the total is even at 6-6. 4 of the the Support votes lack any given merit - exactly the type you said "carry less weight". In particular, Randy Kryn's vote simply addresses the SMcCandlish in a way that suggests that vote was solicited elsewhere and just dropped in as a favor to the nominator. None of the Oppose votes are "less weight" as they each give their views by citing WP policies and external sources. At the very least this should have been closed as no consensus, whereas I consider this a clear Not Moved based on the votes being weighted. -- Netoholic @ 12:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
As it's been several months since we talked about this, I wanted to make sure you're aware of this RfC on British railway station names here. Cheers,-- Cúchullain t/ c 18:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Re: 'You say "we've been moving away from unnecessarily parenthetical disambiguation inexorably in many topics" - please could you provide some examples of that?' See years of moves catalogued at WP:BREEDDAB for starters. WT:RM also has a semi-useful search function; you can find a lot more by searching for "natural" and "comma" and "parenthetic" or "parenthetical" and more specific keywords like WP:NATURAL, WP:NATURALDIS, and WP:NATURALDAB. Due to the decentralized way in which RM works, we really don't have a proper archive of RM, and that search seems to be the best we can do. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 21:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Amakuru:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
Halloween!
– —usernamekiran
(talk)
12:43, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).
Hi! I would like to kindly request that you please stop reverting my edits made to railway stations in Turkey. They have been completely uncontroversial until you started reverting them. I will start a discussion for the multi-moves on the requested moves page. Until a consensus is reached, please stop reverting the edits. I spent around three hours changing all those names and I dont want to have to do it again. Thank you for your understanding. ( Central Data Bank ( talk) 17:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC))
Hi! After reading the feedback on my suggested move, it looks as though it will not be changed to my suggested format. Therefore I will redirect the pages I have reverted, however I would like to ask if there is a bot or a quicker way to revert them all because doing it manually takes a lot of time. Also, for some stations such as Basmane station and Koşu station, I am unable to revert them. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! ( Central Data Bank ( talk) 13:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC))
I don't know if this edit and this one are something you've done on other dabs, but I don't believe it is incorrect. The title of a show, by itself, is not generally used to refer to individual seasons of a show, so these articles are not considered to be ambiguous with the title, and are not generally listed on a dab. — swpb T go beyond 14:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)