This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the WP:BLP/Noticeboard regarding WP:NPOV. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Carl Benjamin's rape joke".The discussion is about the topic Carl Benjamin. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- Amaroq64 ( talk) 09:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry mate, didn’t realise I overwrote you with a conflicting edit on Dennis Skinner. SpaceFox99 ( talk) 00:19, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Is she not The Hon? If not, why not? Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 03:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard (link to the general board) regarding
Rachel Reeves (link to discussion directly). Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Galendalia CVU Member \
Chat Me Up 16:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC) DRN Volunteer
Howdy hello! A heads up: your signature, or at least the version I saw at WP:RFPP, did not have any links in it. That's no bueno, you signature needs to link to both your user page and talk page in some manner, otherwise it won't be picked up by all sorts of bots or scripts, and isn't very useful to other editors. If you need help with that, leave a note on my talk page. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 16:01, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
This revert was a false positive on my part; that page gets his frequently with vandalism to do with the subject's name (silly variants on it, etc). I see now that you were simply trying to standardize caption formats, my apologies. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Thank you for your work on splitting out Blair ministry. It had been on my list for ages, but I could never get around to doing it. Bravo! RGloucester — ☎ 14:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC) |
Thanks for your message. Unless I am missing something, the article supports my edit. Could you please indicate how Woodcock qualifies for the title? SW1APolitico ( talk) 20:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
I saw you reverted my edits on Angela Rayner article. In fact, Rayner does hold the position of ‘Deputy Leader of the Opposition’ and I have an official source backing that up - Rayner’s page on the UK Parliament site: https://members.parliament.uk/member/4356/career Ciaran.london ( talk) 10:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
[[Leader of the Opposition (United Kingdom)|Deputy Leader of the Opposition]]<br />[[Shadow First Secretary of State]]? (Especially since Tom Watson didn't actually hold the office, I've checked lol) Let me know what you think. Alex ( talk) 14:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! Ciaran.london ( talk) 21:10, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Alex B4, please don't edit the article on John Reid. I like it. It is very clean and beautiful.
Kind Regards,
Alex B4, please stop deleting the term "Shadowing" from Chris Smith, if you look on Thatcher's site, she also has the term shadowing, so why do you keep deleting this, is it just because you don't like it? And don't you dare delete the term "Sec. of State" from Gisela Stuart's site, look at Dawn Primarolo's site, she has it. If you dare try to remove my outstanding work, I will do my best to block you. - Andrei-Williams-2005 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrei-Williams-2005 ( talk • contribs) 16:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
still think we should be have the shadowing parameter. It states to have key facts in infoboxes, well having the office holder’s opposite number in them is a key fact! Ciaran.london ( talk) 22:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Steven Anderson (pastor). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 ( talk) 22:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
My edits are constructive. The current page is badly written. I suggest you refrain from removing my edits. Thank you.-- 86.144.191.234 ( talk) 22:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. GiantCheeseBall ( talk) 12:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Re "Not that it matters whether it's COVID or coronavirus, but if COVID, the name should be in all-caps" [1] it most certainly does matter.
You are correct about it being all caps, though. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 02:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Noticed you deleted of my changes about John Swinney, (sorry if i got the name wrong). He is from Scotland which is part of the UK therefore he is a British politician right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:F586:5801:E025:9A3B:E112:38CF ( talk) 13:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
~~~~
.
Alex (
talk) 13:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Why did you remove the link to the article by David Collier? TonyRiley2021 ( talk) 08:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
I think you’re allowing your own bias to colour your judgement TonyRiley2021 ( talk) 12:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
He is a very minor politician who has never held any ministerial position, he is not a statesman. I don't know if you are him, or if you work for him, but I cannot imagine any other reason you would want to boost him in this way. DuncanHill ( talk) 10:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Protests by Westboro Baptist Church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from reallifevillains.miraheze.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 20:23, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Alex, I noticed you reverted the edit to Douglas Ross’ page regarding leader of the opposition.
If Scotland does not have a LOTO, then why is there a page called Leader of the Opposition (Scotland). Should the article be deleted?
Cheers JLo-Watson ( talk) 13:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Another idea, we could have Leader of the Opposition in the infoboxes of the officeholder with a status of 'de facto', just like Rachel Reeves and Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office. 2A00:23C5:2C01:9501:D09B:85EB:A0BA:1265 ( talk) 18:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Alex B4
Please can you explain what you were trying to do in this edit [2] to Christine Grahame?
The effect of your edit seems roughly similar to reverting the page to the state it was in before the election: see [3]
You edit [4] wrongly:
has served as Deputy Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament since 2016
This look to me like WP:Vandalism. I hope you have some other explanation.
-- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 18:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minister of State for Middle East and North Africa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minister of State for Middle East and North Africa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Ancient nation of Israel, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the
deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here.
Padgriffin
Griffin's Nest 03:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Forth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minister of State for Education.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm interested to know why some people's titles have been removed. Is it a Wiki rule ?
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiredcleangate6 ( talk • contribs) 02:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow Secretary of State for the Future of Work until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
He was appointed as Minister for Defence People on 7 July 2022. [5] Why did you make this edit? [6] Mike Rohsopht ( talk) 03:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
I've just looked at the adding of "Right Honourable" to Malcolm Offord's page. As there was some confusion, I emailed the House of Lords who replied:
Good morning
Thank you for your email,
We can confirm that Lord Offord of Garvel's full title does not included 'The Rt Hon'.
As indicated on his Parliamentary webpage:
https://members.parliament.uk/member/4931/career
The House of Lords is not responsible for and cannot update Wikipedia pages.
We hope you find this information useful.
You can find out more about the House of Lords
ordering or downloading free publications.
Kind regards,
Enquiry Service
Communications
House of Lords
London SW1A 0PW
020 7219 3107 Freephone 0800 2230 855
So really the title should be removed.
Happy to forward on the email if needs be.
Best,
David DavidFinFro ( talk) 16:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, why are you treating Minister of State for Oversees Territories, Commonwealth, Energy, Climate and Environment [8] as the successor of Minister of State for Asia, Energy, Climate and Environment [9]? Actually the responsibilities related to Asia were mostly transferred to Minister of State (Indo-Pacific) [10]. Please explain. Thank you. Mike Rohsopht ( talk) 14:11, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for acting as a non-involved editor, removing the templates from Lord Offord of Garvel's page and cleaning it. DavidFinFro ( talk) 12:34, 20 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the WP:BLP/Noticeboard regarding WP:NPOV. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Carl Benjamin's rape joke".The discussion is about the topic Carl Benjamin. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- Amaroq64 ( talk) 09:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry mate, didn’t realise I overwrote you with a conflicting edit on Dennis Skinner. SpaceFox99 ( talk) 00:19, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Is she not The Hon? If not, why not? Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 03:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard (link to the general board) regarding
Rachel Reeves (link to discussion directly). Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Galendalia CVU Member \
Chat Me Up 16:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC) DRN Volunteer
Howdy hello! A heads up: your signature, or at least the version I saw at WP:RFPP, did not have any links in it. That's no bueno, you signature needs to link to both your user page and talk page in some manner, otherwise it won't be picked up by all sorts of bots or scripts, and isn't very useful to other editors. If you need help with that, leave a note on my talk page. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 16:01, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
This revert was a false positive on my part; that page gets his frequently with vandalism to do with the subject's name (silly variants on it, etc). I see now that you were simply trying to standardize caption formats, my apologies. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Thank you for your work on splitting out Blair ministry. It had been on my list for ages, but I could never get around to doing it. Bravo! RGloucester — ☎ 14:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC) |
Thanks for your message. Unless I am missing something, the article supports my edit. Could you please indicate how Woodcock qualifies for the title? SW1APolitico ( talk) 20:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
I saw you reverted my edits on Angela Rayner article. In fact, Rayner does hold the position of ‘Deputy Leader of the Opposition’ and I have an official source backing that up - Rayner’s page on the UK Parliament site: https://members.parliament.uk/member/4356/career Ciaran.london ( talk) 10:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
[[Leader of the Opposition (United Kingdom)|Deputy Leader of the Opposition]]<br />[[Shadow First Secretary of State]]? (Especially since Tom Watson didn't actually hold the office, I've checked lol) Let me know what you think. Alex ( talk) 14:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! Ciaran.london ( talk) 21:10, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Alex B4, please don't edit the article on John Reid. I like it. It is very clean and beautiful.
Kind Regards,
Alex B4, please stop deleting the term "Shadowing" from Chris Smith, if you look on Thatcher's site, she also has the term shadowing, so why do you keep deleting this, is it just because you don't like it? And don't you dare delete the term "Sec. of State" from Gisela Stuart's site, look at Dawn Primarolo's site, she has it. If you dare try to remove my outstanding work, I will do my best to block you. - Andrei-Williams-2005 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrei-Williams-2005 ( talk • contribs) 16:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
still think we should be have the shadowing parameter. It states to have key facts in infoboxes, well having the office holder’s opposite number in them is a key fact! Ciaran.london ( talk) 22:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Steven Anderson (pastor). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 ( talk) 22:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
My edits are constructive. The current page is badly written. I suggest you refrain from removing my edits. Thank you.-- 86.144.191.234 ( talk) 22:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. GiantCheeseBall ( talk) 12:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Re "Not that it matters whether it's COVID or coronavirus, but if COVID, the name should be in all-caps" [1] it most certainly does matter.
You are correct about it being all caps, though. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 02:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Noticed you deleted of my changes about John Swinney, (sorry if i got the name wrong). He is from Scotland which is part of the UK therefore he is a British politician right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:F586:5801:E025:9A3B:E112:38CF ( talk) 13:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
~~~~
.
Alex (
talk) 13:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Why did you remove the link to the article by David Collier? TonyRiley2021 ( talk) 08:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
I think you’re allowing your own bias to colour your judgement TonyRiley2021 ( talk) 12:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
He is a very minor politician who has never held any ministerial position, he is not a statesman. I don't know if you are him, or if you work for him, but I cannot imagine any other reason you would want to boost him in this way. DuncanHill ( talk) 10:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Protests by Westboro Baptist Church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from reallifevillains.miraheze.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 20:23, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Alex, I noticed you reverted the edit to Douglas Ross’ page regarding leader of the opposition.
If Scotland does not have a LOTO, then why is there a page called Leader of the Opposition (Scotland). Should the article be deleted?
Cheers JLo-Watson ( talk) 13:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Another idea, we could have Leader of the Opposition in the infoboxes of the officeholder with a status of 'de facto', just like Rachel Reeves and Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office. 2A00:23C5:2C01:9501:D09B:85EB:A0BA:1265 ( talk) 18:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Alex B4
Please can you explain what you were trying to do in this edit [2] to Christine Grahame?
The effect of your edit seems roughly similar to reverting the page to the state it was in before the election: see [3]
You edit [4] wrongly:
has served as Deputy Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament since 2016
This look to me like WP:Vandalism. I hope you have some other explanation.
-- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 18:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minister of State for Middle East and North Africa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minister of State for Middle East and North Africa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Ancient nation of Israel, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the
deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here.
Padgriffin
Griffin's Nest 03:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Forth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minister of State for Education.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm interested to know why some people's titles have been removed. Is it a Wiki rule ?
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiredcleangate6 ( talk • contribs) 02:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow Secretary of State for the Future of Work until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
He was appointed as Minister for Defence People on 7 July 2022. [5] Why did you make this edit? [6] Mike Rohsopht ( talk) 03:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
I've just looked at the adding of "Right Honourable" to Malcolm Offord's page. As there was some confusion, I emailed the House of Lords who replied:
Good morning
Thank you for your email,
We can confirm that Lord Offord of Garvel's full title does not included 'The Rt Hon'.
As indicated on his Parliamentary webpage:
https://members.parliament.uk/member/4931/career
The House of Lords is not responsible for and cannot update Wikipedia pages.
We hope you find this information useful.
You can find out more about the House of Lords
ordering or downloading free publications.
Kind regards,
Enquiry Service
Communications
House of Lords
London SW1A 0PW
020 7219 3107 Freephone 0800 2230 855
So really the title should be removed.
Happy to forward on the email if needs be.
Best,
David DavidFinFro ( talk) 16:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, why are you treating Minister of State for Oversees Territories, Commonwealth, Energy, Climate and Environment [8] as the successor of Minister of State for Asia, Energy, Climate and Environment [9]? Actually the responsibilities related to Asia were mostly transferred to Minister of State (Indo-Pacific) [10]. Please explain. Thank you. Mike Rohsopht ( talk) 14:11, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for acting as a non-involved editor, removing the templates from Lord Offord of Garvel's page and cleaning it. DavidFinFro ( talk) 12:34, 20 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)