![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
Hey Alex, I would really appreciate if when you change anything in the live version of an infobox, you update the sandbox with the same changes. When I try and copy over sandbox changes I come into conflict with code that I then need to figure out where it came from. Thank you! -- Gonnym ( talk) 06:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
This discussion at User talk:BeebleBrox may be of interest to you, since you are mentioned in it. It's a discussion about if it's appropiate for Matt to retain their pending changes reviewer right. Thank you Ted Edwards 19:22, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Ok it seems that there was a misunderstanding on my part. I saw Cole the wonder removing content from the page without explanation so I checked their talk page and saw they had done similar things in the past and (incorrectly) assumed that they were continuing to do so with the edit to the Supergirl page. However when I saw your revert of my revert it was somewhat cleared up that it was in fact not them doing a bad edit, so I just struck out my warning to the user with a message below it. Sakura Cartelet Talk 02:39, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Man in the High Castle (TV series). Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. I don't mind a change if it sourced or a decent explanation is given but Faver1fan93 has ignored this once already, and ignored it again on the Daredevil (TV series). I cannot be sure from his edit summary but I think maybe he was claiming WP:EGG but I honestly don't think that applies here, there are so many names on the cast list already that do not exactly match the name of the page they link to.
As an Anon IP it is endlessly frustrating trying to follow the rules when others blatantly ignore them, revert everything, and rarely bother to explain. I half expect to be accused of edit warring for my efforts. I fully expect my edit to be reverted again so I'd appreciate it if you could do the next restore when he changes the name again on the article Daredevil (TV series). -- 37.110.218.43 ( talk) 10:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
A sensible edit, but I considered converting to a redirect myself & decided to CSD since I did not think that the redirect was a useful one; I've nominated it for deletion. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Alex, I Just want to have The Cat in the Hat article just please revision to me! I just want Dr. Seuss happy because he is the mascot of Dr. Seuss' franchise! Please put things back! Please PickleAndPeanutFan ( talk) 01:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey Alex,
I was actually thinking of Category:Pages using infobox television episode with incorrectly formatted episode list yesterday as I fixed some Goodies infoboxes. Do you think this is something a bot request could do or would it cause more problems?
I was thinking of maybe something like this:
|series=
param.|series=
param does not have a value, skip article.|series=
param had a value, check if an article exists at "List of <series> episodes".What do you think? (unrelated to this, but related to tracking categories, is it ok to categories userspace? I've worked on finding all the television tracking categories this past month and put them all in Category:Television articles needing attention, but did not know about your userspace one. -- Gonnym ( talk) 08:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
The observation about spoons is accurate and, I think important. I did a Google search and found several sources. Didn't feel i Should include them all. What do you believe is needed? HiLo48 ( talk) 23:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I've been having some issues regarding the definition of "recurring" on List of How to Get Away with Murder characters as you can see here: [1], [2], [3]. As I stated, a character should only be introduced to the recurring table after 3+ appearances within a season, otherwise they're guest stars; I've been following other shows' characters list, where this is assumed. Is there any rule on Wikipedia I can use to prove my point? Cheers. - Chairhandlers ( Talk to Me!) 13:12, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I was just wondering if it's okay to edit the above draft? I have some production info about the episode from the latest Doctor Who Magazine that would be beneficial, but I don't want to tread on anyone's toes. - JuneGloom07 Talk 17:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the mix up on The Ghost Monument. I've been chewed out by other users for not spotting copyright violations in 3 new articles and 1 draft (in all 4 cases OTHER users, more experienced and some with NPR rights ALSO missed said copyright violations- yet they don't get in trouble for it and I did). I thought that unreviewed articles don't show up in off wiki searches but I forgot websites might come to Wikipedia and copy the stuff from articles, even unreviewed ones (I guess Doctor Who is high traffic article). so I'm sorry. JC7V -talk 08:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Could I ask you why you thought it was acceptable for you to say my edit
here to be in extremely bad faith
(as said
here) when you called
this edit an actual personal attack
(as you said in
this edit summary)?
Ted
Edwards
14:43, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
JOIN THE DISCUSSION ON THE TALK PAGE BEFORE REVERTING, WE HAVE TO TRY TO REACH A CONSENSUS!
Sebastian James ( talk) 12:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
I hope You saw this Episode so Acording To Director or Writer, wat Posible Comon Sense Reason Y didn’t Dumb Delko ask Hayden if He can describe the Thief’s Dam Face to Sketch Artist?( 2601:204:D97F:E584:2D96:1655:41D4:B8F0 ( talk) 21:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC)).
Ur name was on Revision History season 4 of Csi Miami?( 107.77.214.185 ( talk) 23:42, 11 November 2018 (UTC)).
Hey Alex, I'm trying to do a correct date format check for Template:Infobox television episode like you did Module:Episode list, but I'm having problem making a correct validation check. I'm not sure if the {{ Start date}} template itself is causing the data to be formatted before I can check it, or if it's something else. Do you have any idea how to make this work? -- Gonnym ( talk) 23:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
It doesn't look like you were notified. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 11:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
I accurately added the correct final viewing figures for Demons of the Punjab. You removed the accurate final viewing figures and replaced them with an incorrect figure. Please don't edit articles to introduce incorrect, unsourced figures. The source I gave is 100% accurate. It is here: https://www.barb.co.uk/viewing-data/four-screen-dashboard/. Please don't reverse my accurate edits to replace them with incorrect, unsourced data again. 27.131.36.174 ( talk) 15:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for initiating a title swap in order to make Richard Bott (clergy) the main Richard Bott. Although "Richard Bott" now directs to the article about Richard Bott the clergy man (yay), the article is incorrectly titled Richard Bott (skeleton racer). Likewise, the article about the skeleton racer is now titled Richard Bott (clergy). I do not have the skill set to swap titles, so could I ask you to? Thanks you. Guinness323 ( talk) 06:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I saw you edited the page for ADOW and since I wanted to add something and create a page for some of the actors of the series someone sudgested me to contact one of the editors and here I am. I tried to do it by myself but I am new and it seems very complicated, plus my native language isn't english so I was wondering if you could do it. Daniel Ezra as Nathaniel Wilson and Freddie Thorpe as Matthieu Beny are listed but do not have a Wikipedia article plus Julian Kostov as Timur, Rorie Stokton as Timothy and Leo Ashizawa as Osamu aren't listed and do not have a page. i hope you can help, sorry if I bothered you. -- Valeriaorl77 ( talk) 23:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey AlexTheWhovian,
I was hoping you might do me a favor and take a look at the most recent edit over at the article Returning the Favor. Another editor has consistently attempted to remove an entire section of the article regarding accolades/awards that the series has received. The awarding organization "Got Your 6" has partnered with various entertainment companies such as 21st Century Fox, NBCUniversal, CBS, HBO, Viacom and Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Lionsgate, A+E Networks, Live Nation Entertainment, UTA, 44 Blue, The Ebersol Lanigan Company, DreamWorks Animation, Endemol Shine North America, and Valhalla Entertainment. The awarding event was reported on by Variety as seen here: https://variety.com/2017/tv/news/got-your-6-veterans-the-gifted-disjointed-1202607620/. The other editor has argued that the paragraph/section of the article should be removed and cited General Notability Guidelines and Undue Weight as an issue. I may be in the wrong here but I am of the belief that the information warrants mentioning in the article given the stature of the organization within the entertainment industry and the fact that the awards event was covered by a major publication (being Variety). I don't know...maybe give the article and its edit history a look and let me know what you think. Worth noting that I've created an article for the organization here: Got Your 6. – BoogerD ( talk) 05:41, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
In the episode articles for
American Horror Story: Apocalypse, editors have assumed that because part of the season takes place in October 2021 (evidenced by a character saying that an email sent on October 20, 2021 was sent a week ago
and the next episode was set on Halloween no more than a few days later), an earlier event (a nuclear missile hit LA starting the titled Apocalypse) must have taken place in early 2020 as the the show says the 2021 events took place 18 months after the bomb hit. They also assume that flashbacks must have taken place in 2017 as these events are described by the show as being three years before the bomb
. What I'm asking is if these assumptions are OR or not? As I believe you don't watch the show, I hope I've explained the situation clearly enough.
Ted
Edwards
14:20, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
There was an edit by an anon reverted by another anon on Kerblam! very recently which basically said something horrid about you by name. That anon needs serious blocking and investigating to see if it's someone we know hiding behind the address. Unlikely they'd be that stupid but you never know. Good hunting. ZarhanFastfire ( talk) 20:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry I missed that I was reverting the edit summary and thanks for catching that. I thought I was reverting only the reference to Ken Kirby, which I could not find a reference for as an actor or character in the series. A stunt person is listed as portraying the character(?) in the IMDB which is rather curious so I am may have missed something there too. Donner60 ( talk) 02:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Locations based on Doctor Who, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou ( talk) 14:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
I added the source for other IP's sentence. Is it still not enough to stay on the page? Sebastian James ( talk) 23:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Alex,
I was wondering if you might take a look at a discussion (see here Wikipedia:Teahouse#Secondary sources on episode lists) that I've been pulled into in the last two days. An editor recently removed an episode table from an article I was working on citing a lack of sourcing. However, in the last year-and-a-half of serious editing I've been doing on here, I've been led to believe that such sourcing of titled, directors, writers, and airdates were unnecessary if the episodes of said series have already aired or been released. The two editors engaged in the discussion have stated that this is not the case so I am hoping if you, and potentially other in the WP:TV community might be able to help here. Thanks, BoogerD ( talk) 04:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
If it’s worth anything, I’d like to apologize for my conduct during our Dracula discussion. Regardless of whatever was bugging me at that moment it wasn’t something you deserved to have get put on you. You were absolutely right to move it back to draftspace. And it’ll remain there until filming can be sourced. Sorry again, and hopefully I can be civiler in any future discussions. Rusted AutoParts 04:43, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
You got more trouble being done against ya. I kinda been to your talk page when I saw what was done on Kerblam! a while back, and now it seems that the same user, whom you suspected worked on an IP user, is doing it again. This time with The Witchfinders. I gonna get an admin to put that article under page protection, but you need to put up an alert about this. I know you want to ignore them, but I don't think it will work. GUtt01 ( talk) 16:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
As a mere IP user who has viewed many users edits, I’ve noticed a large number of your edits especially ones replying to other users regardless if they are an IP editor or registered editor to be somewhat insulting with a hint of cheek around them, especially if an editor gets something wrong or inserts information without a source. You can’t fully expect other people to respect your contributions if a fair number of your edits towards other people’s edits come across as quite cheeky. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.219.214 ( talk) 18:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
This source differs from this one when it comes to episode durations. Which one is more appropriate? I guess the latter one also includes trailers for the upcoming episodes. Sebastian James ( talk) 21:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
Hey Alex, I would really appreciate if when you change anything in the live version of an infobox, you update the sandbox with the same changes. When I try and copy over sandbox changes I come into conflict with code that I then need to figure out where it came from. Thank you! -- Gonnym ( talk) 06:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
This discussion at User talk:BeebleBrox may be of interest to you, since you are mentioned in it. It's a discussion about if it's appropiate for Matt to retain their pending changes reviewer right. Thank you Ted Edwards 19:22, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Ok it seems that there was a misunderstanding on my part. I saw Cole the wonder removing content from the page without explanation so I checked their talk page and saw they had done similar things in the past and (incorrectly) assumed that they were continuing to do so with the edit to the Supergirl page. However when I saw your revert of my revert it was somewhat cleared up that it was in fact not them doing a bad edit, so I just struck out my warning to the user with a message below it. Sakura Cartelet Talk 02:39, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Man in the High Castle (TV series). Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. I don't mind a change if it sourced or a decent explanation is given but Faver1fan93 has ignored this once already, and ignored it again on the Daredevil (TV series). I cannot be sure from his edit summary but I think maybe he was claiming WP:EGG but I honestly don't think that applies here, there are so many names on the cast list already that do not exactly match the name of the page they link to.
As an Anon IP it is endlessly frustrating trying to follow the rules when others blatantly ignore them, revert everything, and rarely bother to explain. I half expect to be accused of edit warring for my efforts. I fully expect my edit to be reverted again so I'd appreciate it if you could do the next restore when he changes the name again on the article Daredevil (TV series). -- 37.110.218.43 ( talk) 10:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
A sensible edit, but I considered converting to a redirect myself & decided to CSD since I did not think that the redirect was a useful one; I've nominated it for deletion. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Alex, I Just want to have The Cat in the Hat article just please revision to me! I just want Dr. Seuss happy because he is the mascot of Dr. Seuss' franchise! Please put things back! Please PickleAndPeanutFan ( talk) 01:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey Alex,
I was actually thinking of Category:Pages using infobox television episode with incorrectly formatted episode list yesterday as I fixed some Goodies infoboxes. Do you think this is something a bot request could do or would it cause more problems?
I was thinking of maybe something like this:
|series=
param.|series=
param does not have a value, skip article.|series=
param had a value, check if an article exists at "List of <series> episodes".What do you think? (unrelated to this, but related to tracking categories, is it ok to categories userspace? I've worked on finding all the television tracking categories this past month and put them all in Category:Television articles needing attention, but did not know about your userspace one. -- Gonnym ( talk) 08:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
The observation about spoons is accurate and, I think important. I did a Google search and found several sources. Didn't feel i Should include them all. What do you believe is needed? HiLo48 ( talk) 23:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I've been having some issues regarding the definition of "recurring" on List of How to Get Away with Murder characters as you can see here: [1], [2], [3]. As I stated, a character should only be introduced to the recurring table after 3+ appearances within a season, otherwise they're guest stars; I've been following other shows' characters list, where this is assumed. Is there any rule on Wikipedia I can use to prove my point? Cheers. - Chairhandlers ( Talk to Me!) 13:12, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I was just wondering if it's okay to edit the above draft? I have some production info about the episode from the latest Doctor Who Magazine that would be beneficial, but I don't want to tread on anyone's toes. - JuneGloom07 Talk 17:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the mix up on The Ghost Monument. I've been chewed out by other users for not spotting copyright violations in 3 new articles and 1 draft (in all 4 cases OTHER users, more experienced and some with NPR rights ALSO missed said copyright violations- yet they don't get in trouble for it and I did). I thought that unreviewed articles don't show up in off wiki searches but I forgot websites might come to Wikipedia and copy the stuff from articles, even unreviewed ones (I guess Doctor Who is high traffic article). so I'm sorry. JC7V -talk 08:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Could I ask you why you thought it was acceptable for you to say my edit
here to be in extremely bad faith
(as said
here) when you called
this edit an actual personal attack
(as you said in
this edit summary)?
Ted
Edwards
14:43, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
JOIN THE DISCUSSION ON THE TALK PAGE BEFORE REVERTING, WE HAVE TO TRY TO REACH A CONSENSUS!
Sebastian James ( talk) 12:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
I hope You saw this Episode so Acording To Director or Writer, wat Posible Comon Sense Reason Y didn’t Dumb Delko ask Hayden if He can describe the Thief’s Dam Face to Sketch Artist?( 2601:204:D97F:E584:2D96:1655:41D4:B8F0 ( talk) 21:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC)).
Ur name was on Revision History season 4 of Csi Miami?( 107.77.214.185 ( talk) 23:42, 11 November 2018 (UTC)).
Hey Alex, I'm trying to do a correct date format check for Template:Infobox television episode like you did Module:Episode list, but I'm having problem making a correct validation check. I'm not sure if the {{ Start date}} template itself is causing the data to be formatted before I can check it, or if it's something else. Do you have any idea how to make this work? -- Gonnym ( talk) 23:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
It doesn't look like you were notified. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 11:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
I accurately added the correct final viewing figures for Demons of the Punjab. You removed the accurate final viewing figures and replaced them with an incorrect figure. Please don't edit articles to introduce incorrect, unsourced figures. The source I gave is 100% accurate. It is here: https://www.barb.co.uk/viewing-data/four-screen-dashboard/. Please don't reverse my accurate edits to replace them with incorrect, unsourced data again. 27.131.36.174 ( talk) 15:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for initiating a title swap in order to make Richard Bott (clergy) the main Richard Bott. Although "Richard Bott" now directs to the article about Richard Bott the clergy man (yay), the article is incorrectly titled Richard Bott (skeleton racer). Likewise, the article about the skeleton racer is now titled Richard Bott (clergy). I do not have the skill set to swap titles, so could I ask you to? Thanks you. Guinness323 ( talk) 06:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I saw you edited the page for ADOW and since I wanted to add something and create a page for some of the actors of the series someone sudgested me to contact one of the editors and here I am. I tried to do it by myself but I am new and it seems very complicated, plus my native language isn't english so I was wondering if you could do it. Daniel Ezra as Nathaniel Wilson and Freddie Thorpe as Matthieu Beny are listed but do not have a Wikipedia article plus Julian Kostov as Timur, Rorie Stokton as Timothy and Leo Ashizawa as Osamu aren't listed and do not have a page. i hope you can help, sorry if I bothered you. -- Valeriaorl77 ( talk) 23:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey AlexTheWhovian,
I was hoping you might do me a favor and take a look at the most recent edit over at the article Returning the Favor. Another editor has consistently attempted to remove an entire section of the article regarding accolades/awards that the series has received. The awarding organization "Got Your 6" has partnered with various entertainment companies such as 21st Century Fox, NBCUniversal, CBS, HBO, Viacom and Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Lionsgate, A+E Networks, Live Nation Entertainment, UTA, 44 Blue, The Ebersol Lanigan Company, DreamWorks Animation, Endemol Shine North America, and Valhalla Entertainment. The awarding event was reported on by Variety as seen here: https://variety.com/2017/tv/news/got-your-6-veterans-the-gifted-disjointed-1202607620/. The other editor has argued that the paragraph/section of the article should be removed and cited General Notability Guidelines and Undue Weight as an issue. I may be in the wrong here but I am of the belief that the information warrants mentioning in the article given the stature of the organization within the entertainment industry and the fact that the awards event was covered by a major publication (being Variety). I don't know...maybe give the article and its edit history a look and let me know what you think. Worth noting that I've created an article for the organization here: Got Your 6. – BoogerD ( talk) 05:41, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
In the episode articles for
American Horror Story: Apocalypse, editors have assumed that because part of the season takes place in October 2021 (evidenced by a character saying that an email sent on October 20, 2021 was sent a week ago
and the next episode was set on Halloween no more than a few days later), an earlier event (a nuclear missile hit LA starting the titled Apocalypse) must have taken place in early 2020 as the the show says the 2021 events took place 18 months after the bomb hit. They also assume that flashbacks must have taken place in 2017 as these events are described by the show as being three years before the bomb
. What I'm asking is if these assumptions are OR or not? As I believe you don't watch the show, I hope I've explained the situation clearly enough.
Ted
Edwards
14:20, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
There was an edit by an anon reverted by another anon on Kerblam! very recently which basically said something horrid about you by name. That anon needs serious blocking and investigating to see if it's someone we know hiding behind the address. Unlikely they'd be that stupid but you never know. Good hunting. ZarhanFastfire ( talk) 20:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry I missed that I was reverting the edit summary and thanks for catching that. I thought I was reverting only the reference to Ken Kirby, which I could not find a reference for as an actor or character in the series. A stunt person is listed as portraying the character(?) in the IMDB which is rather curious so I am may have missed something there too. Donner60 ( talk) 02:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Locations based on Doctor Who, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou ( talk) 14:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
I added the source for other IP's sentence. Is it still not enough to stay on the page? Sebastian James ( talk) 23:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Alex,
I was wondering if you might take a look at a discussion (see here Wikipedia:Teahouse#Secondary sources on episode lists) that I've been pulled into in the last two days. An editor recently removed an episode table from an article I was working on citing a lack of sourcing. However, in the last year-and-a-half of serious editing I've been doing on here, I've been led to believe that such sourcing of titled, directors, writers, and airdates were unnecessary if the episodes of said series have already aired or been released. The two editors engaged in the discussion have stated that this is not the case so I am hoping if you, and potentially other in the WP:TV community might be able to help here. Thanks, BoogerD ( talk) 04:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
If it’s worth anything, I’d like to apologize for my conduct during our Dracula discussion. Regardless of whatever was bugging me at that moment it wasn’t something you deserved to have get put on you. You were absolutely right to move it back to draftspace. And it’ll remain there until filming can be sourced. Sorry again, and hopefully I can be civiler in any future discussions. Rusted AutoParts 04:43, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
You got more trouble being done against ya. I kinda been to your talk page when I saw what was done on Kerblam! a while back, and now it seems that the same user, whom you suspected worked on an IP user, is doing it again. This time with The Witchfinders. I gonna get an admin to put that article under page protection, but you need to put up an alert about this. I know you want to ignore them, but I don't think it will work. GUtt01 ( talk) 16:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
As a mere IP user who has viewed many users edits, I’ve noticed a large number of your edits especially ones replying to other users regardless if they are an IP editor or registered editor to be somewhat insulting with a hint of cheek around them, especially if an editor gets something wrong or inserts information without a source. You can’t fully expect other people to respect your contributions if a fair number of your edits towards other people’s edits come across as quite cheeky. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.219.214 ( talk) 18:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
This source differs from this one when it comes to episode durations. Which one is more appropriate? I guess the latter one also includes trailers for the upcoming episodes. Sebastian James ( talk) 21:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |